Could Jeremy Bonderman Be Available?
Lynn Henning of the Detroit News raises an interesting possibility: perhaps, with all of their starting pitching depth, the Tigers would consider trading Jeremy Bonderman this winter. Said Henning:
"He may yet be considered untouchable by the Tigers. But he will become a free agent at the end of 2008. He has also shown some fourth-year inconsistency that might be troubling to the Tigers, typified by last week's loss at New York in less-than-inspiring fashion. Bonderman would, theoretically, be the kind of pitcher who could draw a heavy return. Conceivably, the Tigers could land a power first baseman, as well as an infield position prospect or two -- the kind of players they need in a minor league system where pitchers outnumber by a good margin the hitters being developed."
Bonderman, if he stays on course, is due for a massive payday after the above-mentioned 2008 season. At that point, he'll have just turned 26. It's a rarity to enter free agency at such a young age, but the Tigers brought this upon themselves. Dave Dombrowski chose to promote Bonderman in 2003 with no experience above A ball. I guess they really needed him to take part in the 119 loss season. Bonderman came over the previous year with Carlos Pena as part of the Ted Lilly deal.
Despite concerns about his "inconsistency," it's hard to view 2006 as anything but progress for Bonderman. He's on pace to set career bests in innings, strikeout rate, walk rate, and home runs allowed. He's thrown quality starts 57% of the time, on par with teammates Kenny Rogers and Nate Robertson.
On the surface, though, Bonderman's more mainstream stats haven't been good enough to win over the media. His 4.01 ERA is nothing special. Then again, his component ERA comes out to 3.43. Component ERA is a Bill James invention that estimates what an ERA should be based on peripheral stats like hits, walks, and home runs allowed. It predicts next year's ERA better than the actual. Other unappreciated unlucky hurlers based on this stat include Jake Peavy, Matt Cain, and Dave Bush.
I imagine Bonderman's eleven wins are the other reason he's flown under the radar. Based on Expected Wins, he should have twelve. Teammates Kenny Rogers, currently with 15 wins, also should have twelve based on the way he's pitched. If Bonderman had a 3.43 ERA and 15 wins, he'd be looked at a bit differently right now.
It'll be interesting to see if the perception of Bonderman results in a deal this winter. He'll be 24 entering next season, and keeps getting better. He'd be a coveted commodity on the level of Josh Beckett, and perhaps even more highly regarded. The bounty could be huge...Miguel Cabrera huge if the Marlins want to go that way.

Bonderman for Wells Maybe? The tigers Need more offense and Could have Good outfield D With wells and Granderson and the BlueJays get their Big 3 in Roy, Bonderman and the 55 million $ man. What do you think Tim?
Posted by: Paul AKA twinsfan | September 04, 2006 at 11:37 PM
If the price is right.. then yes, he might be traded... just like D-train might be too.. but these kind of mihgt be's are hard to force into realty more often than not
Posted by: Yu Hsing Chen | September 05, 2006 at 08:58 AM
twinsfan, could the jays afford bonderman's rising price? If Riccardi convinces management he needs more money the point is moot, but I think they also would have to take into consideration they'll own Chacin a wad of money soon.
Though Halladay, Bonderman, Burnett, and Chacin would be a scary 1-4 especially if Ryan is there for the 9th.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 05, 2006 at 09:39 AM
Cabrera? Don't you think that's going a little overboard? He's got a year less experience and is much more valuable.
If they're looking for a first baseman, perhaps Nick Johnson and a prospect?
Wells is only signed for one more year so even though he's a huge bargain I'm not sure the Tigers would do that.
Posted by: bobo | September 05, 2006 at 10:42 AM
I think you've exaggerated the bounty Bonderman will bring back. No one, but no one, would trade Miguel Cabrera for Bonderman. He's good, but not good enough. He's only had one month this year with an ERA under 3.60 and he tends to collapse in the second half.
Posted by: DentalPlan | September 07, 2006 at 05:41 AM