![]() |
|
|
| |
« Needs and Luxuries: Texas Rangers | Main | Keith Foulke To Return »
We learned yesterday that the Phillies have already had internal discussions about bringing in Curt Schilling. Schilling was asked about the possibility yesterday, and confirmed that Philly is on his "short list" assuming they'd want him back.
Schilling might be one of the few free agent buys this winter that actually works out. He turns 41 soon, so health is obviously a concern. With a 4.4 K/BB in 151 innings, his command is as amazing as ever. The commitment would be low-risk, probably one year at $15-16MM. And switching from the AL East to the NL - what pitcher wouldn't love that? Just ask Ted Lilly. If Schilling and Cole Hamels could combine for 360 innings next year, the Phils would be in great shape.
Here's the problem: the Phillies supposedly have $20MM to burn. Give a minimum $13MM of it to Schilling, and you fall short on Mike Lowell by at least $4MM. If the budget is truly that strict, perhaps this can be solved with backloading for Lowell. Keep in mind that both players' first choice is still Boston.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554e4297e8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Schilling Open To Phillies:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Schilling to the Phillies would be a great move.
For baseball fans it would be really neat to see Schilling in a Phillies uniform and Glavine rejoining with the Braves. Great ways to end amazing careers.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 13, 2007 at 12:22 PM
It's a possibility I think that maybe for the first time in years they go over budget. They'll have more money coming off the books after next year.
I personally don't think they'll go after Lowell, but will go after a 3B maybe through trade. I'd love to see Schill back here though.
Posted by: no funny hats | October 13, 2007 at 12:26 PM
That would be awesome to see Schilling and Glavine back in the NL East battling each other.
I'd just be fired up to watch that possible Atlanta staff. It really could be something like:
Hudson/Smoltz/Hampton/Glavine/Jo Jo Reyes, with another good starter or reliever very possibly acquired for Renteria.
That would have the possibility of being a pretty damn solid staff actually.
Posted by: djskilbr | October 13, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Just throwing it out there but for any Red Sox fan, aren't you glad that the Sox did not trade Mike Lowell for Scott Linebrink in the offseason like so many of us were speculating would happen?
Posted by: dudewheresmygrl | October 13, 2007 at 01:29 PM
Are the Cubs on his short list? I can see him wanting to be the pc that brought a championship to a long suffering franchise ( much like he was in Boston). Maybe the cubs move one of their young starters ( marshall,gallagher or veal) as part of a trade for a leadoff guy ( figgins?) or ss ( tejada?). Can't complain about a rotation of Zambrano/schilling/lily/hill/marquis - might produce 4 15 game winners
Posted by: touchmymonkey | October 13, 2007 at 01:30 PM
I have a feeling it will be Boston or Philly or retire for Schilling
Posted by: Larsen101 | October 13, 2007 at 02:20 PM
"Hudson/Smoltz/Hampton/Glavine/Jo Jo Reyes, with another good starter or reliever very possibly acquired for Renteria. "
Where is Chuck James?
I dont know, Glavine is solid, but dont expect him to post anything under a 4.25 and a 1.40 whip next year if he goes back to atlanta (or NY for that matter). It has gotten to a point where the NL East just knows him, flat out. He is solid, but there are days when he just flat out doesnt have anything, and will get rocked. Everybody talks about how adding Glavine to the Braves rotation would somehow make them invincible or something. I would have no problem with Tom going to Atlanta. I would have no problem facing him 5 times a year. You know what he is going to do and with the right approach you can hit him. He will come inside sometimes, but not much. I just dont think it would be smart for the Braves to pay him 12 mil or something. It could be a nice story, but it could also leave a very sour taste in the mouths of Atlanta Braves fans if he isnt good. This would obviously not be the optimum way for Glavine to depart MLB. Glavine is solid I guess, but he usually either gets hit very hard or not at all. He throws a million pitches because he nibbles around the strikezone and never gives in (which is sometimes infuriating.). Glavine can be the most frustrating pitcher to watch, or he can go out and throw a gem. I personally dont care what Glavine does, I am just warning people not to expect the old Glavine if and when he goes back to Atlanta.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 13, 2007 at 02:48 PM
have the cubs thought about throwing their name in the schilling conversations? i don't know if he just is locked in between boston and philly but the cubs could REALLY use schilling probably more than any other of the potential free agents. A-Rod would be nice but at 30mm it seems a bit excessive. the cubs have most of their positional players locked in for next year and schilling would look great in cubbie blue....
Posted by: junbun | October 13, 2007 at 03:17 PM
Nothing that Schilling has said would indicate that his options are Boston/Philadelphia or retire. This guy still wants to pitch.
Posted by: themfightnwords | October 13, 2007 at 04:23 PM
I understand where your coming from its just a feeling that I have but I'm probably wrong tho ha ha.
Posted by: Larsen101 | October 13, 2007 at 04:36 PM
"Hudson/Smoltz/Hampton/Glavine/Jo Jo Reyes"
Id be more excited to see Hamels/Schilling/Myers/Kendrick/Moyer but Im guessing signing Shilling would keep Myers in the pen and the list is not nearly as good with Eaton´s name on it.
Larson101: Im with you on Glavine not going back to the Braves. I hope he retires because Id rather die than watch another Moyer vs. Glavine match up.
Posted by: Utley4prez | October 13, 2007 at 05:01 PM
"Nothing that Schilling has said would indicate that his options are Boston/Philadelphia or retire. This guy still wants to pitch."
If he wins another ring this year I can see him retiring and going video games full time. He knows his place in baseball history and his chances of getting into the hall. A big post season and another title pretty much has him as a lock. He's not doing it for the money, he's taken to the area I could definitely see him retiring if they win and Boston doesn't offer him another contract. That's the bitch for Theo though to get compensation for Curt is he goes elsewhere he needs to offer arbitration, if he does Curt's definitely taking it.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 08:08 PM
Curt Schilling is not going to the Hall Of Fame.
Posted by: 92-93 | October 13, 2007 at 09:40 PM
"Id be more excited to see Hamels/Schilling/Myers/Kendrick/Moyer but Im guessing signing Shilling would keep Myers in the pen and the list is not nearly as good with Eaton´s name on it."
They could put Myers back into the rotation when they sign Francisco Cordero ;)
Posted by: no funny hats | October 13, 2007 at 09:51 PM
"Curt Schilling is not going to the Hall Of Fame."
You're definitely wrong about that one. He's a hall of famer right now. Even without 1 more ring, and another years worth of stats.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 10:10 PM
You think Smoltz is a hall of famer? Schilling's numbers/accomplishments are better than his.
You think Tom Glavine is a hall of famer? Schilling's numbers/accomplishments are better than his.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 10:14 PM
Um, Schilling's numbers/accomplishments are nowhere near Glavine's. Start at the 300 wins as a LHP and the 2 CY Youngs and work down from there.
Smoltz is a different story, and is no lock for the HoF either. But he at least has a CY and the 3 years as a dominant closer with 150 saves on his record.
Posted by: 92-93 | October 13, 2007 at 10:23 PM
Wins are a retarded judge of talent.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 11:01 PM
Saves are a worthless statistic.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 11:01 PM
I agree with both sentiments. Unfortunately, the voters look at that stuff.
Posted by: 92-93 | October 13, 2007 at 11:08 PM
Seriously check the numbers he's better than both of them. It's not his fault he pitched at the same time as Clemens, Randy Johnson, and Pedro. He's a hall of famer. I didn't believe it till I looked back in June.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 11:10 PM
Schilling gave the DBacks some "I'd be willing to come back" lip service at one point this season too. I think he's either leaving his options open or working up leverage for a new BoSox deal, or both.
Either way, at about 13MM on a 1 year deal he'll definitely find a bevy of suitors.
Posted by: tmar | October 13, 2007 at 11:19 PM
"Either way, at about 13MM on a 1 year deal he'll definitely find a bevy of suitors."
It's only 1 team that can nail him down for 1 year, 13 million though. Theo is definitely offering him arbitration. Unless he has some metric to judge worth to his franchise that no-one else can figure out, he has to offer him arbitration. He offered Graffanino arbitration. Unless another team comes with more money, or more years there is no way he doesn't take a 1 yr/ 13 million dollar deal to stay with Boston.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 13, 2007 at 11:35 PM
I cant belive some of the stuff I am reading. Are people actually being serious when they say Smoltz is no lock for the HOF? What?????????????????
Wow. I dont know, I have been watching baseball seriously for like 10 years, I dont know if there was one pitcher in a big game I would rather have going for me then Smoltz. He is going to strikeout his 3000th guy next year, has a career 3.25/1.18, He mae exactly 5 starts from 2001-2004. Give him those 120 or so starts, he has around 270 wins right now. He was a member of every single one of the Braves division titles during their recent run. Here are his career numbers against the Braves biggest rivals.
Mets- 300 IP 3.42 269/81 K/BB
Philly- 250 IP 3.67 247/83
Fla.- 199 IP 2.71 202/56
Playoff numbers:
60 IP
7-0
2.52
.091
53/12 K/BB
Just watching Smoltz pitch, he is one of the best I have had the priviledge of watching for the last decade. If Smoltzie isnt in the HOF, then I am done with baseball.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 14, 2007 at 11:49 AM
You can say some of the same things about Schilling, he is a cltch, gutty, post season performer, a horse, your right. I just dont see how anybody that watches baseball can say Smoltz is not a HOF.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 14, 2007 at 11:52 AM
I look at Smoltz and Schilling's stats very similarly, with a couple of exceptions:
1) Smoltz had 1 season less to accumulate those stats
2) Smoltz has proven himself as a dominant starter and a dominant closer.
3) Smoltz has a Cy Young award
4) Schilling's postseason record is excellent, but Smoltz's is STELLAR.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | October 15, 2007 at 10:16 AM