![]() |
|
|
| |
« Twins After Craig Monroe? | Main | Phillies May Only Have $10MM To Spend »
A trusted reader dropped me a line regarding a Bruce Levine appearance on ESPN Radio 1000. Remember, Levine was the guy who scooped the Jacque Jones trade.
Levine reported today that the Cubs are putting together a package of young talent in an attempt to acquire the Rays' Carl Crawford. That would leave the Cubs with a speedy, athletic outfield of Alfonso Soriano, Felix Pie, and Crawford.
The emailer says today's report did not mention names. Ronny Cedeno would certainly be a useful addition for the Rays, and you'd have to expect some premium pitching heading over as well. I'm thinking Rich Hill, Carlos Marmol, or both. The problem with these proposed blockbuster deals is they often open up new holes. Thoughts?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534a42724970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cubs To Make Offer For Crawford?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Zambrano will have an era under 4...but yeah, thats probably it. Lilly would be around 4...but yeah. That rotation and bullpen are making me dry heave...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 06:36 PM
fine but I'm looking you up in few years....!
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 06:37 PM
@nic:
Haha, thanks. As a Yankees fan, I'm scared to death of the Rays and their system.
It's one of the big reasons why I want them to get younger and deeper and to shed bad contracts.
AL East will be fun to watch in a year or two with the Red Sox, Yankees and Rays all fighting for 1 or 2 playoff spots.
Posted by: henry14theking | November 13, 2007 at 06:40 PM
Fair enough Delmonmvp.
Posted by: Teetz | November 13, 2007 at 06:43 PM
The whole trade doesn't make sense if ur a real cubs fan and saw them play this year then you would know that guys like Hill, Marmol, Hart etc. will be more helpful then crawford. Crawford's stats weren't even all that impressive. We have speed lets get someone with pop and another arm.
Posted by: KazMo | November 13, 2007 at 06:58 PM
First off, I wasn't saying that the Rays were a bad team, I was stating that it will still be a few years before they are legitimate contenders with the way the Yankees and Red Sox have been playing. My point was that unless the Rays are willing to take a bunch of prospects, which they apparently aren't going to do, then the deal won't get done. I certainly wasn't being optimistic.
Posted by: Cynic81 | November 13, 2007 at 08:54 PM
Why should the Rays want to take a bunch of prospects? They have the best minor league system in baseball and don't need 5 crappy prospects that will never become above average major leaguers in exchange for a 26 year old allstar. It makes zero sense.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 09:48 PM
omg nooooo why would marmols name even come up? in my opinion he should have been the team mvp he came out of nowhere and absolutely solidified the bullpen...
if he or pie is traded at anytime during the offseason i am going to cry
Posted by: grathanial | November 13, 2007 at 09:52 PM
By far, Marmol is who the Rays would want the most. Out of Marmol, Soto and Hill, I would rather have the first two over Hill. If im the Rays and the Cubs won't pony up Marmol, I walk away. If the Marlins can get 3 or 4 of Kershaw/LaRoche/Billingsly/Kemp/Loney, surely the Rays can get 2-3 players of that caliber for Crawford. Im not even sure if I would consider Marmol, Hill, or Soto to have the upside of any of those Dodger players. I would rather have Kershaw, LaRoche, Billingsly over any of the Cubs young players or prospects. Soto and Marmol have never been considered top prospects and came out of no where this past season. So now we are all supposed to consider them elite young stars? I don't think so. Soto doesn't have enough major league experience or a good enough track record to be considered an elite young catcher, or even one of the best catching prospects in the game. Marmol needs some closing experience before I'll consider Marmol the next K-rod. He still has constrol issues, his numbers don't seem sustainable, and he has no track record of closing and hardly any experience in the pen. Its one thing if Cubs fans think their magical beans will turn into anything amazing, but Im not buying it. A lot of fans tend to believe THEIR best prospects are just as good as everyone else's top prospects.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 10:44 PM
Didn't Hill lead the league in strikeouts? Is that valuable as a lefty? And didn't Marmol has the best stat on inherited runners? Crawford is great but Marmol and Hill is too much from the Cubs standpoint (and probably not enough for the Rays). Marshall is probably the best #5 guy out there and should be better if the opponents don't see big benders all day the day before. He's a young lefty with 2 yrs experience. He's not worthless, or at least not to every team. I say pass on Crawford if it requires Hill or Marmol.
Posted by: Milburn26 | November 13, 2007 at 10:47 PM
So long as there are viable and significantly less expensive options available elsewhere, the Rays are not going to get the offer they apparently would need to get to trade Crawford.
Compared to Crawford, a guy like Fukudome will give you...
* similar AVG
* similar power
* superior OBP
* similar defense
* all at a similar $ cost.
The only advantages Crawford has is that he's established himself in MLB and Fukudome hasn't, and he'll steal a ton of bases.
Tell me if a track record and a net of 40 or so SBs is worth Marmol, Hill, etc. Of course it isn't.
Sounds to me like there just isn't a fit here. The Cubs just need to pony up what it'll take to land Fukudome, and be done with an OF of Soriano - Pie - Fukudome.
Posted by: davearm | November 14, 2007 at 12:47 AM
To the Rays writer, some real sources of yahoo and the Tribune, "The Chicago Cubs could try to pull off a trade for Carl Crawford of the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, which would probably take Rich Hill, Eric Patterson and a couple more prospects.
Source: Chicago Tribune"
So yes, prospects are involved. People need to remeber that trades rarely make sense from both angles. Teams usually end up making strange - dumb trades. Do not forget about Henry's intangables either. He usually pulls off one-sided trades, either in favor of the Cubs, or in favor of the other team. Look at Nomar, Lee, and Rameriez if you need examples. You can specualte all you want here, but if a deal actually gets done, it will not make sense for one side or the other, and it will involve players that we may not think should be involved, plain and simple. Read actual reports and stop speculating please.
Posted by: MZink | November 14, 2007 at 01:12 AM
I'd *highly* prefer the Cubs go after Fukudome and *keep* whatever pitching they'd otherwise have to pay for Crawford.
Crawford is a good young player - but he is definitely *not* worth the ransom it sounds like the DRays would ask for.
His OPS last year was .820, which is pretty good, but not great relative to average AL Left fielders.
Also, his peripheral stats point to a very healthy dose of luck.
His hit rate last year was .375!! (That's his batting average on balls in play). His career average in that stat, including last year is just .334). In other words - he had *a lot* of luck.
Prior to 2007, he had shown steady improvement every season. That hit rate he enjoyed last year covered up what would have otherwise been considered a step backward.
His 2007 K% rate was up from 14% in 2006 to 19%. His BB% rate was down from 5.8% in 2006 to 5.2% in 2007.
Buyer beware. He's still remarkably young (26) considering that he already has almost 1,000 career hits. But, I don't think he's a superstar, and he wasn't as good in 2007 as people think. I predict a regression in 2008 to a sub-800 OPS.
If the cubs have to give up the players being bantered about here, they will regret it ... Soriano/Pie/Fukodome would be a very solid OF and the Cubs wouldn't have to give up great young pitching to get it.
-Kevin
Posted by: Kevin G. | November 14, 2007 at 01:40 AM
And Fukudome sounds more like he's gonna get 12-14 mill a year. B-P radio had a guy that speculated he could get upwards of 18 million.
Also ignore the fact. Tropicana field is not exactly a hitters haven except for in 2006.
Crawford has been a lot better on the road in two of the last three seasons. The one he wasn't was 2006
Posted by: MaxxPower | November 14, 2007 at 02:03 AM
Well all the Tampa Tribune and every other newspaper is doing is speculating. If you actually think the front office of either club is letting the media know which players would be involved, then you are mistaken. Every newspaper writer has about as much of an idea what is being kicked around as I do. There are truely few sources that have a direct knowledge of whats going on behind closed doors. For all we know, the Cubs never made an official offer and the Rays never called the Cubs asking for anything. How often do we hear about a proposed trade when the teams have not ever been in contact. More than likely this all started with someone speculating and it exploded from there.
By no means am I trying to speculate for the better good of the Rays. Based on what the Rays front office has said and the needs of the club, I have offered my two cents (pure speculation) on which players the Rays would want in a trade. While I don't think prospects would not be involved, I am positive that any trade would not be centered around prospects, unless you still consider Soto a prospect. The Rays front office has been very upfront in saying that they no longer have any interest in trading for prospects, as they are content with the state of our minor league system and would primarily seek to upgrade the major league roster. They want major league talent for major league talent. Players who could contribute this season.
With that being said, I couldn't see Marmol, Hill or Soto not being involved to some capacity. Further, of those three, Marmol and Soto would actually be addressing a organizational weakness. Hill would be a nice addition for 08, but with a strong core of young starting pitchers on the way in Tampa Bay, starting pitching is not the biggest concern by any means. Relief pitching, catching and shortstop are the biggest concerns. In trading Crawford, they would seek to improve in those areas. Trading for Hill and prospects would be a step back for the Rays, as the prospects involved in any deal would likely pale in comparison to the prospects the Rays already possess.
I really do not expect any Cubs fans to like what I am saying. As I stated before, any trade for Crawford would likely be seen as horrible move for the club who wants him bad enough. Unlike Cabrera, the Rays are not shopping Crawford, instead open to listening to any offers.
So please take what I say with a grain of salt.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 14, 2007 at 03:36 AM
Crawford spent parts of 2007 injured. He's still one of those "tools" guys that migth have a massive season, but it keeps growing less likely with every season. I'd say the next two seasons might tell the tale. That's probably why the Rays want to deal him. His value will never be higher. I'd love to see the Rays get Murton as part of the deal.
Posted by: coryjwilson | November 14, 2007 at 08:33 AM
Do you think the rays have enough major league talent to trade for cabrera and shift Longoria to short?
Posted by: nic | November 14, 2007 at 08:52 AM
I think a lot of people here consider themselves to be smarter then the GMs involved. I am not saying that everything that everybody has said is wrong, but I think that there is a reason that they have the jobs that they do and get paid the money that they do and if anybody here was actually smarter then them, their positions would be switched. I am sure Hendry is well aware of Crawford's numbers and the trends that they are following. It is not like Hendry, or any GM for that matter, is not going to look at the whole picture and talk to scouts and get a really solid understanding of what kind of player Crawford is, and what kind of player he will be 2-3 years down the road. Granted, all GMs are wrong from time to time, but to suggest that Hendry would possibly deplete the Cubs of all of their young talent at the drop of hat just because he could get a player that has good name recognition, is pretty foolish.
Posted by: geosoto4mvp | November 14, 2007 at 10:52 AM
Dear Rays fans,
In case you forgot who you are, you are the Rays! No matter what you think of your farm system, you are still the 30 million dollar payroll Rays. Until you get a new stadium, new owner, or move you will not compete with the Yankees or the Red Sox. You can hardly compete with the Blue Jays. Until one of those three things happen, you will be forced to trade your best players away 2 or 3 years early to get maximum value, because you know you can not sign them. Stop complaining about outlandish Cubs trade rumors and complain about an ownership that will trade a star like Crawford.
Posted by: erkman12 | November 14, 2007 at 11:06 AM
delmonmvp,
You don't consider Soto one of the best catching prospects out there? He was the MVP of the PCL with ridiculous numbers...and before that he was known as a defensive catcher. So put those together and you have probably the best rookie catcher not named Salty in the bigs.
You must not have watched Marmol last year either. He was unreal. It was a big enough sample size to know that yes, he is just that good. He was BETTER than K-Rod last year. In fact, in his first full year, he was the BEST middle reliever IN THE GAME. With his service time, the fact that he is young, the fact that he is cheap for YEARS to come, makes him EXTREMELY valuable. Don't underestimate this guy.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 14, 2007 at 11:21 AM
Kevin,
I concur.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 14, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Here's some pure speculation... if the Cubs move Marmol in a deal for Crawford, it makes Pie expendable. Who could the Cubs trade him for, as far as middle reliever goes? Are there any closers that might be on the table? The only guy that comes to mind with closer experience is Otsuka from the Rangers, since the Rangers have been connected to Gagne via free agency.
This is only good move if the Cubs can turn Pie into something that they lose in the deal. Marmol right now is an eighth inning guy in my opinion, he'd be a huge risk closing. Kerry Wood might be that closer with Dempster in the rotation, or Howry, although I think Howry is also an 8th inning guy when healthy.
I'd like a deal centered around Marmol with Theriot/Cedeno as the shortstop need and a combination of starting pitcher and outfield prospect, i.e. patterson and marshall (hold on to Gallagher). However, it creates another hole. Pie can grab a middle reliever, and the team would be better off than last year with a left handed hitter who in the NL at Wrigley would have 20+ HR power
Posted by: RandomScrub | November 14, 2007 at 12:12 PM
Let's face it, this is not going to happen. My guess is that the Cubs contacted the Rays JUST to see what it would the Rays would want and somehow word got out.
Posted by: Cynic81 | November 14, 2007 at 12:13 PM
Here's a bizarre thought, anyone think it's possible that the Cubs will see if Marmol can be successful going back to being a starter?
Posted by: Cynic81 | November 14, 2007 at 12:24 PM
First of all i am a HUGE cubs fan but you other cubs fans out there have to realize that you cant just give up any old guy and get a super star! The only way i think this deal will work is if the cubs give up a pitcher (Rich Hill,Marmol, or MAYBEY marquis) I think a good deal would be Rich Hill,Felix Pie,and maybey bob howry or sean marshall
most likely the Rays will ask for something more but i dont think the cubs will give much more.
No way Jim Hendry is willing to give up Soto who really showed what he could do at the end of last season and in the short time the cubs had in the playoffs.The Rays are likely going to want Soto but i dont think the deal will work with him in there.
=)
Posted by: CMichaels6 | November 14, 2007 at 04:57 PM
Marquis is pretty GARBAGE! but i think the rays are gonna want a vetran pitcher.
Posted by: CMichaels6 | November 14, 2007 at 04:58 PM
erkman12,
While you may be correct about the Rays payroll, much of what you said is inaccurate. The Rays do have a new owner (2 years ago) and have a new open-aired stadium in the works, opening as soon as 2012.
In addition, its a common misconception that the Rays have ever traded away their young talent because they can't afford to sign them longterm. Who have the Rays ever traded away for that reason? Lugo, Huff, Baez, Hendrickson? Wow we are really sad to see those guys go. Further, the Rays actually have already signed Crawford (till 2011) and Baldelli (till 2012) longterm, which was one the first moves by the new ownership. They are in talks right now to sign kazmir longterm as well.
Baseball experts believe that the Rays have a much stronger nucleus in place than the Blue Jays and Orioles, and should be able to compete in the AL East as soon as 2009.
While I would hate to trade away Crawford, if the Rays did trade him away it would because of the outfield depth we have and value Crawford has. Dukes could easily step in for Crawford and the Rays offense would hardly miss a beat. In addition, they have Desmond Jennings on the way, a possibly more talented version of Crawford.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 14, 2007 at 06:01 PM
aduncaroo,
I have no doubt that Soto will be a good young catcher, but I appologize if its hard to buy into the hype for such a small sample size. Soto arguably came out of no where this season, offensively speaking. Its not uncommon by any means for a player to have a break out season, and be unable to sustain those numbers year after year. Many young players experience one great season in AAA, and are never able to repeate or put up similar numbers in the majors. That being said, I hope Soto turns out to be a great young catcher.
I really do think that Marmol has a very bright future. But to say that Marmol is better than K-rod? Closing games is a whole nother ball game. Some people can't the pressure and never become more than middle relievers. You can't compare the rookie season of an unproven young arm to that of an established top closer or ever to an established set up man. Its all about consistency. Some of your fellow fans don't even think that he can sustain success without developing better control. I agree. Marmol certainly has electric stuff, but thats not always enough, especially for a closer. In the 9th innings hitters are more locked in and its harder to get them to chase. Many young pitchers crack under that pressure and can't develope the short term memory needed to be a successful closer.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 14, 2007 at 06:10 PM
Marquis is garbage and would get eaten alive pitching in the AL East. In addition, the Rays would not want to take on such a horrible contract with better options such as Niemann, Price, McGee, and Davis a year or less away from the majors. I would be highly suprised to not see at least two of those four pitchers in the Rays rotation sometime in 08.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 14, 2007 at 06:15 PM
IMHO, if I were the Rays I would take nothing less than a package of Geovanny Soto, Matt Murton and Sean Gallagher for Crawford. I don't think the Rays should take Cedeno as part of any package involving Crawford, as they have Reid Brignac in their system coming up. Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: frick15204 | November 14, 2007 at 08:39 PM
Personally, I wouldn't want Murton or Gallagher. We have no need. If Crawford is traded, we have multiple options to take his place in left. As for Gallagher, we already have a plethora of young major league starters just as good or better and a bunch of top pitching prospects who should be up in 08. We have too many mediocre back of the rotation starters as it is. Soto and Marmol would be my pick.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 15, 2007 at 02:07 AM
Delmon,
Remember, I didn't say Marmol IS better than K-Rod...but last year, he was. Its obvious. he had the best numbers of any reliever in the game. That being said, I know he is a rookie...and to say he IS better than KRod would be dumb. Better control would be nice, don't get me wrong....but I'm pretty sure I would be just fine with him putting up those numbers year after year. As far as looking for relief help...he is literally the BEST option in the game, as far as value. He is young, cheap, and probably has the best slider of anyone in the game not named K-Rod. He also throws a 97 MPH fastball which he is controlling pretty well. The Rays would be THRILLED to get him, as would any other team. However, it would still take someone else to get Crawford...I know that. Maybe something like Marmol, Fox (he can catch, has big power, but sucks defensively), Patterson and Veal?? Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 19, 2007 at 02:08 PM