MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Marlins Toy With Angels, Dodgers | Main | Matt Garza Traded For Delmon Young In Blockbuster »

Johan Santana Rumors

UPDATE, 11-28-07 at 7:30pm: Jon Heyman chimes in on the Santana talks.  If the Red Sox continue to keep Ellsbury out of the deal, the Yankees may have the best offer with Hughes, Cabrera, and another pitcher.  The inclusion of Ellsbury would swing it toward the Sox.  It appears the two rivals are battling going head to head on this one.

FROM 11-28-07 at 11:15am:

Let's review the Johan Santana situation, because there's been plenty flying around the last couple of days.

  • Yankees: Jon Heyman said yesterday the Twins would want Melky Cabrera plus one of Hughes/Chamberlain/Kennedy.  LaVelle E. Neal III confirmed the Yankees as one of three teams that have actually had trade talks with the Twins about Santana.  It's been suggested that Santana would be open to signing a long-term deal in New York.  Aaron Gleeman analyzes Yankees/Santana scenarios here.  Also, Lisa Kennelly and Ed Price are saying Chamberlain and Robinson Cano are untouchable in these talks.  So think Melky and Hughes.  By the way, the Yankees let Aaron Rowand's agent know that they'll be interested if they trade the Melkman.
  • Red Sox: The Sox are another of those teams confirmed to have had trade talks about Santana with the Twins.  Heyman said it would take Buchholz or Lester plus Ellsbury.  The Sox want to substitiute Crisp for EllsburyUPDATE: Neal says Jed Lowrie, Brandon Moss, and perhaps Kevin Youkilis have been discussed as well.
  • Angels: The third team confirmed to have had trade talks for Santana.  He's not atop the Halos' list though.  I suggested earlier that a package of Brandon Wood, Reggie Willits, and Nick Adenhart would work for the Twins, but seems too steep for one year of Santana.
  • Mets: The Mets have had talks with the Twins as well, according to Buster Olney.  It's known that the Mets don't want to include Jose Reyes or David Wright in a deal.  Makes sense.  Carlos Gomez, Fernando Martinez, Lastings Milledge, Mike Pelfrey, and Kevin Mulvey are the other names being tossed around.  But John Harper's source isn't so sure Reyes it out of the question, as that might be the only way the Mets can get Santana.
  • Mariners: Larry LaRue says the Twins would want Adam Jones, Brandon Morrow, and Jeff Clement.
  • Dodgers:  Though they've been linked to Santana, he doesn't seem to be on the frontburner.
  • Cubs: Long shot and first I've heard of it, but George King and Joel Sherman suggest the possibility.  Felix Pie would have to be involved.  Hard to see the Cubs signing Santana to a record-setting extension given their ownership situation.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105349d8602970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Johan Santana Rumors:

Comments

Wait a sec:

Gleeman points out how Hughes has major league ready stuff and can blow away teams RIGHT NOW and then says the Yanks should trade him?

Also, from Heyman's reports, the Twins didn't even ask that much. I hope Cashman keeps Hughes and Joba out of this.

On that note:

http://keephughes.blogspot.com/

SAVE PHIL HUGHES! :D

It the Red Sox could offer Lester, put in Crisp instead of Ellsbury, and add another prospect like Bowden or Bard, then it would be solid. But I don't see it happening.

I guess Alan Horne wasn't good enough for the Twins. What a shock.

I guess Alan Horne wasn't good enough for the Twins. What a shock.

Hummm…

So the only way the Mets might be able to land Santana is to include Reyes, BUT an offer of Melky + Kennedy may get it done from the Yanks?

…Yeah, no disrespect to you Tim, but I think these rumored packages are just a bit off on the mark here…

@darkstar:

Yea I know. I'm a Yankees' fan and even I have to say there's a huge discrepancy between the packages.

It might all be bogus or it might be that Santana is forcing a trade to the Yankees.

"It might all be bogus or it might be that Santana is forcing a trade to the Yankees."

Meh. Really think he has that power? I'm guessing the Twins would be better off on the field and in the court of public opinion hanging onto Santana then trading him for peanuts. I don't think he has any real leverage there; if a few cards fall right, the Twins could conceivably contend this season with Santana still on board. No, I'm not suggesting that's likely to happen...but it's a possibility. Not like they're the Royals with an ace.

I can just see it now, Aaron Gleeman must somehow be a Yankee fan too since he wrote Hughes is a potential #1, Kennedy is a potential #2 or #3, and Melky Cabrera is above average in CF already.

OK... let's say that the Skanks best offre is Kennedy and Melky. Does Gomez+Pelfrey+Humber top that?

If not, Gomez+F-Mart+ 1 of Pelf or Humber definitely tops it.

The two most ludacris and made up offers on here are deals centered around Crisp and Lester adn the Melky and Kennedy deals. Crisp and Lester is AWFUL. Outside of Red Sox Nation, Lester isnt more than a #3 or #4. Hes a great story and all, but cmon. Buchholz or Ellsbury has to be involved. Both of those two have the talent to become all-stars. Crisp is crisp, and Lester is a solid at best player. I would think the yankees have to give up either Hughes or Joba. Anything less than that, would be an absolute steal for hte yanks.

I bet it will take either-

Cabrera and Hughes/Joba and a second tier-prospect.

Cano and Huges/Joba.

Cano, kennedy, second tier-prospect

I dont see why everyone overhypes Kennedy either. Hes projted to be a #3. Why would the Twins want and above Avg CF and a #3 when they could easily get better?

As a Red Sox fan I really hope the Yankees include Hughes in any deal if they get Santana. It seems that people value Joba more now...his fb/slider combo is pretty damn impressive but I could see him getting hurt somewhat frequently or losing effectiveness as a starter and I'm not sure his other pitches will be that great...you always here he has a pretty good curve as well but you hear mixed reports. It just seems that Hughes has a better build and more polish to be the better starting pitcher over time. It seems like Hughes slight decline in velocity may play a role in that but the guy knows how to pitch and I would not be surprised to see him get back to 94-95 with regularity once 100% healthy. If the Yanks get Sanatana I really hope Hughes is the center piece.

I'll have to agree with Jared on this one. I think Joba has a presently higher perceived value, but I think Hughes will be a better starter.

If Santana somehow goes to the Red Sox without inclusion of Ellsbury and/or Buchholz, I will be extremely dumbfounded.

If the Twins consider a deal of Melky and IPK too low -- and feel Melky/Hughes is more suitable, I can't imagine how a Lester/Crisp combo could at all seem reasonable considering Crisp's salary and the fact that Lester doesn't project anywhere near a #1. I would be absolutely irate if that happened.

If the Sox won't deal Buchholz or Ellsbury, and the Skanks won't deal Hughes or Joba...

there is NO reason Santana shouldn't be a Met next year.

Gomez/F-Mart/Pelfrey/Humber/Mulvey.

Take 4, and that will top anything the Sox or Skanks will offer (NOTE: I said WILL offer, not CAN)

This talk of Reyes is hilarious.

Reyes >> Hughes, Joba, Buchholz, or Ellsbury

Keep in mind a #3 starter will cost you $10M a year so Kennedy does have value.

Pelfrey and Humber have looked subpar thus far from what I have seen but I do like Gomez and would hate to see the Mets trade him.

As far as Santana, if I am the Yankees I would pull out of the sweepstakes and make a run for Haren if it doesnt cost you Hughes/ Joba or Cano.

I do not get why the Yanks would consider trading Hughes who showed signs of greatness and is only 21.

IMO Santana may have peaked and the numbers are getting worse every year.

Why not exchange risks with the Cubs? Mussina for Prior.

I pray that Omar stays away from Beane. Haren had a great first half, but hit a wall and was mediocre in the second half. I'm not really sold on him being a top-tier pitcher yet.

Blanton... don't get me started.

Am I nuts or are the Red Sox putting way too much value on Coco Crisp? If I'm trading away Johan Santana, who will still only be 29 years old next year, I would settle for nothing less than two top tier talents (either major or minor leagues), and Crisp does not make that cut in my mind.

"If Santana somehow goes to the Red Sox without inclusion of Ellsbury and/or Buchholz, I will be extremely dumbfounded."

So would I, but I'd love to see it.

Although I do think that Lester is undervalued right now. He was one of baseball's top pitching prospects before he was brought up too early (2006, at age 22) and before the discovery of his cancer. He's stil rebuilding his stamina from the chemotherapy; I think he still has the potential to be a hugely successful starter. His conditioning program over this offseason might make or break his career.

Gmbing and others,

Cabrera isnt even LgAvg ~ that was discussed thoroughly last night in the other thread. His batting is already what his Minor-League numbers say it should be, so he shouldn’t be expected to get better; and his D doesnt begin to make up for that below-average bat. Melky Cabrera compares very nicely with So Taguchi ~ hardly someone people get excited over…

So, considering Cabrera is basically worthless (ie almost every team already has a Melky-type on their roster; the Twins in-house version being called Jason Tyner) that package would really be Kennedy for Santana. Since Kennedy is nothing more than a Top-DP 1.5 years removed from the Draft, the Twins would be better off just keeping Johan for the year and taking the 1st rounder or supplement in 2009… The choice between Johan and the Yanks package is “Johan for one year or a DP which has a year more experience in the minors then the one you’ll get in his place”.

Besides, this is roughly what the Twins SP depth chart looks like with Johan gone. You tell me if they need more SP prospects instead of fielders to plug about 5-6 holes in their current lineup:
Francisco Liriano
Matt Garza
Boof Bonser
Scott Baker
Kevin Slowey
Nick Blackburn
Brian Duensing
Ryan Mullins
And guys like Anthony Swarzak and Yano Pino not far off…

To think the Twins will accept even Joba/Hughes + Trash is kinda nuts since they really, really don’t need Joba or Hughes. THEY NEED HITTING!

DRamos, “the numbers getting worse” isn’t visible in his stats though. Take out the fluke run of the Tribe against him in 2007 and you have by his best season to date. Cleveland really got into his head last year, as a Tribe fan though I can tell you I don’t expect it to be the case in 2008… Anyone not wearing an Indians uniform looked like Cesar Izturis at the plate against him in 07 ~ that isn’t him getting worse…

here's something that i thought of the other day that's pure speculation on my part. couldn't the reds get in on this? santana would own the nl central, and if they would part with bailey, bruce, and encarnacion then the twins would be hard pressed to say no

that's a steep package for the reds, but they can afford to loose those players if they can lock up santana long term (negotiating window?)

plus you could probably interchange bruce with hamilton and bailey with cueto (sp?) as necessary

and a rotation of santana, harang, arroyo, and either cueto/bailey with cordero in the pen would give the reds a really good staff for a change. they'd still have firepower in their lineup as well

(Reds fan)

I'd rather trade for a #3 and watch Bailey and Cueto develop with that offensive power.

Not a chance melky/kennedy gets it done for santana. It's going to take more than 2 prospects for him, most of whom will probably be in the low minors.

darkstar1661, where did you get that about Santana Vs. the Indians? Here are his stats vs. cleveland in 2007: 4.38 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, .242 BAA, with 8 HR in 39 IP. It's not great, but it's not terrible. Here's a couple other teams against him in 2007:

BAL - 5.54/1.38/.300, 4 HR in 13 IP
TOR - 1 start, 5 IP: 10.80/1.80/.318, 4 HR
KAN - 1 start, 6 IP: 3.00/1.67/.320

These are ALL small sample sizes including the CLE numbers, but he wasn't so terrible against CLE compared to some others. The thing that really hurt him was the huge jump in HR allowed, and that wasn't vs. any one team.

What the hell is with the Melky name dropping in all these trades anyway? How long can one guy live off 100 good minor league at-bats?

We're talking about a guy who, in two full seasons with the Yankees, has yet to post an OPS+ over 90. A guy with at best average speed. A guy with a solid, but unspectacular glove. A guy who bats .275 with no power.

A guy who, because he plays in New York, has been heralded as a hero ever since he hit a couple timely homers in his first season in the majors.

He was never very good in the minors (career .769OPS, so his .728 major league mark probably isn't changing much). He doesn't walk a whole ton, and frankly...from watching him play while on the east coast, he's just so exceptionally ordinary. And yet he gets name-dropped like an A-list prospect. He's not. And if he's a major piece of a Johan trade, the Twins are gonna get hosed.

Wake up and look past the name recognition factor, guys. Melky isn't gonna be that great.

Darkstar1661,

Santana has gotten worse every year since 2005 in HRs allowed, ERA, WHIP & Opponent Batting Avg. He had 10 starts in which he gave up 4 or more runs and 5 of those starts were after August 19th. I wont pay $20M a year for 6 six years for a pitcher who may have peaked and struggled recently down the stretch.

He is still a great pitcher but I would not trade a tier 1 prospect like Hughes.

If we were to give up Kennedy/Melky (who I dont think is that good) and a prospect or 2, I would make the deal.

The Yanks have a history of going after pitchers on their decline.

If we trade for him extend for 4 years @ $20M and offer a new contact based on performance (he would be 34 years old)

Booms,

Something like Hamilton + EE + second-tier Pitching Prospect or another fielder would best what is rumored from the Yanks based on the Twins needs. There seriously is not a single team that can be counted out in this if they are willing to offer the contract.

Since we have no clue which teams might be willing to pay him the money he wants, its wide open... (an no, the Yanks/BoSox are not the only club who can spend money ~ the Giants have the current highest paid pitcher and the Rangers signed the previous highest contract ever given before the Yanks gave a similar one this year to the same guy). All of a sudden a team like TB decides Johan is the guy they want to build around and they easily become the frontrunner…

And Meta,

Johan in 2007:
Vs Cleveland ~ 4.38 ERA, 39 IP, 8 HR, 1.154 WHIP, .242 BAA
Vs all others ~ 3.10 ERA, 180 IP, 25 HR, 1.056 WHIP, .217 BAA
…Tell me that doesn’t stack up against all his other years…
Taking one team’s fluke run away, his numbers only regressed ever so slightly ~ if at all…

DRamos,

"He had 10 starts in which he gave up 4 or more runs and 5 of those starts were after August 19th"

this was after Auguest 19th ~ meaning he was already publicly putting the team down because they didnt add, but instead took away players while the Twins were in the race.

His 2007 is skewed because of stuff like that ~ he was in a mental state in which it was like "why are we even trying here if we get close and they never help us out". After 6-7 such years in Minny, he buckled in his mind-state.

I'm an Indians fan, I cant stand the guy ~ but I cant say that there are not solid pieces of evidence that say he is anything less than the most amazing pitcher we have seen in like 20 years. Even at his absolute worse, he is better than anyone else around. To expect a drop from his production today would just mean he ends up with like Haren-like production tomorrow. He is that far ahead of everyone else already, its sick...

I also want to point out that a CHANGE in statistics is not the same thing as a REGRESSION in statistics. Fans obsessed with spotting the next trend and finding the next downfall will always point to any slight aberration in a player's stats as an instant indicator of their demise.

Johan's ERA/WHIP the last 4 years:

2004: 2.61/0.92
2005: 2.87/0.97
2006: 2.77/1.00
2007: 3.33/1.07

So basically, 3 straight years of Cy Young performances, then a down year. Did Roger Clemens never have a weak(er) season during the middle of his career? Clearly he must have been regressing in 1993 when he put up a 4.46ERA for the Red Sox. And the Braves should have cut ties with Tom Glavine after his 1994 ERA of 3.97. And the Mariners shouldn't have waited until 1998 to cut Randy Johnson after his 3.67ERA in 1996. Boy, what a mistake.

Seriously. One bad "Johan year", and suddenly the guy is regressing? A year in which he was still had the best WHIP in the American League, the third fewest hits allowed per 9 innings, the third best K/9 rate, the second most Ks, the 4th best K/BB ratio, the 7th best ERA, the 9th best ERA+, and 15 wins (and a winning record) for a sub-.500 team.

Man, if that's his fucking DOWN YEAR, send him my team's way, please.

darkstar1661, Santana faced the Indians 6 times in 2007:

4/24 - 7 IP, 6 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 7K
5/17 - 7 IP, 4 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 11K
7/28 - 7 IP, 4 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 12K
8/3 - 6 IP, 6 H, 3 ER, 2 BB, 8K
8/29 - 6 IP, 10 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 2K
9/3 - 6 IP, 6 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 3K

So he had 3 consecutive QS against them. during those starts he had a 3.15 ERA, 0.90 WHIP and 31 K in 20 IP. The Indians didn't own him last season: they caught him for 2 games near the end when he was running out of gas. Also notice that he totalled only 5 K in 12 IP the final two games.

I agree that overall the Indians did better against him last year than the rest of the league combined; they also saw him more often than any other team, and he still schooled them until near the end of the season.

My point is that you can't just blame the Indians for skewing his numbers. If you take out his numbers vs. Baltimore, he had a 3.18 ERA, 1.05 WHIP and .220 BAA; those are all improvements, and they did that with just 13 innings against him. Does that mean the Orioles are really the ones who screwed his numbers?

With all this Bos/NY chatter going on here, seems like you guys are overlooking the 1 team that would seemingly be able to offer a package that would trump any I've seen so far: the Angels. With a potential rotation of Santana/Lackey/Escobar/Garland/Weaver who needs offense?

That being said, I believe the aforementioned package of Wood/Santana/Willits might be a little much unless they have a window to sign him to an extension.


I think the Twins are giving the Red Sox a save face option, because a trade for Lester and Crisp for Santana would be a bad trade for the Twins, even though Crisp would help in the fielding department to keep the ERA of Liriano, Baker etc down as Hunter did when he patrol Center Field.

Cano and Hughes for Santana would be a very good trade for the Twins. Cabrera and Hughes is only a slight step above a Crisp/Lester trade. Right now I see the Yankees have the clear advantage in snagging Santana, either a three player trade for Santana, or Cano and Hughes. The Red Sox should dangle Crisp,Lester or Buchholz for Haren, if Oakland is that dumb enough to deal Haren.

If Santana is dealt to the Red Sox, and I doubt it, because the Red Sox are not going to give him a long term contract, expect the same ERA/WHIP as in 2007 because Fenway punishes lefties, (much like see Lester ERA go down if he is traded, and if Gabbard ERA goes down, if he is healthy this year)

Right now, the Yankees have the inside track, They can offer a better deal, Hughes is a better pitcher than Lester, and the Twins should demand Cano instead of Cabrera, and make a three way deal with Texas and Boston to get Crisp.

As long as Santana's change up delivery is the same as his fast ball, he will be one of the top three pitchers in baseball.

The question is whether you give up top prospects for a guy who has logged over 200 innings each season and whose stats have gotten worse.

The stats are still great but will his ERA and WHIP continue to increase over the next few years.

I would make the deal if it doesnt include Cano/Hughes or Joba and I would extend him only 4 years past this upcoming season. I am not a fan of giving players no less a pitcher a deal past 5 years.

I really think Hughes and Joba will post numbers that resemble Beckett/Haren in the near future.

Dark,

"I'm an Indians fan, I cant stand the guy ~ but I cant say that there are not solid pieces of evidence that say he is anything less than the most amazing pitcher we have seen in like 20 years."

I would take Randy Johnson in his prime to Santana.

If you are the Yankees, why would you give up ANYTHING? He is going to test the FA market and they could blow everyone out of the water with an offer. If I'm NYY, I drive up the price, let someone else take him (while giving up quality prospects) for 1 year, then woo him next offseason.

Santana's numbers are remarkably consistent across the board for his career which is amazing considering how good they are. About the only thing out of line last season is that he posted a flukey high HR/FB rate.

Interesting finding (meaning not necesarily meaningful): Johan has been great at Yankee stadium and terrible at Fenway but the 15-20 innings is hardly anything to make any sort of judgement.


I don't think the Twins take Clement from the Mariners if they end up sending Johan to Seattle (5% chance, *maybe*?). Jose Lopez fits a Twins need better at 3B, allowing them to move an all-bat-no-glove guy from that position IIRC. Lopez has All-Star credentials, a good glove, and showed scary ability at an even scarier age in the minors. He slipped a bit last year, but I don't think his long-term prospects have diminished much.


On Aaron Gleeman's scale, Jones is probably an 1- to a 1, Morrow a 2+, and Lopez a 3+ to a 2 (but that low part only because of his recent performance). This is probably a competitive package unless the Yankees or Red Sox crack and give more than we'd expect. Again, though, I still think the Yankees find some way to pull this out of their... backsides.

Meta,

You are correct with the fact that they didn’t have a great line against him in the first couple games just the same, but what they did do was hit 4 HR in those 3 QS games early. Then if you go back and watch the tapes, you’ll notice that they were making great contact, just right to guys. They went 5-1 as a whole vs Johan, it was just a fluke year where the hitters were jumping all over him ~ much more so than many other clubs. Having so many times faced, the end totals show it…

Oh and just as an FYI ~ his SO total was slightly skewed in 07 because of Johnny Peralta. Did anyone see his bats against Johan? It was like when Kruk faced the unit in the AS game…He now has 22So in 28 career ABs and just stands there like a deer in the headlights ~ its pitiful…


And:
Oh God, you’re back again YankeeSkipper…

Cool deal, you can take Johnson if you like ~ but remember that Johnson never put up a single season, prior to his 29th birthday, anywhere near what Johan has done so far. The closest season Johnson had to a Johan season (again, pre 29YO) was this:
1990 3.96 ERA, 1.338 WHIP in 219 IP…
Johans best so far:
2004 2.61 ERA, 0.921 WHIP in 228 IP

Lastly, DRamos:
“The stats are still great but will his ERA and WHIP continue to increase over the next few years.”
…Similar to what I just told Y.Skipper, look at possibly the closest ability pitcher over the last 20 years ~ Randy Johnson. Randy also saw numbers increase from his age 26ish season for about 2 years then saw them drop off the board when he turned 29. He went from 1.417 WHIP to 1.112 WHIP and a 3.98 to 3.24 ERA.

People need to remember that a hitters “prime” is about 28-32 ~ a pitcher oftentimes sees ageas 30-34 as their peak though. So acting as if Johan at 28 is going to regress… well, I just don’t see where it comes from at all ~ two years of numbers that were dominating, just not quite as dominate as one of the previous seasons he has posted; all before he probably peaked??? THAT’S why people feel he will regress?

JMF, would you really feel comfortable trading every good prospect in our system for Santana? I dont want him that bad, all this Mets want an ace talk is overated. Nobody has an ace accept a few teams, and the Mets need a bullpen, not a starter. I would be skeptical about even trading Gomez and Pelfrey. I think it was NJM who said it, and I agree, something scares me a little bit about Santana. I couldnt tell you why, and I dont have any stats to justify it but I would be very weary about gutting the farm for him, and there is no way I give him anything more then 4 years at the money he wants. I think it is less then 1 percent chance of the Mets ending up with Santana.

And oh yeah, type key sucks. This is my third post today, and also my third log in.

"Dark,

"I'm an Indians fan, I cant stand the guy ~ but I cant say that there are not solid pieces of evidence that say he is anything less than the most amazing pitcher we have seen in like 20 years."

I would take Randy Johnson in his prime to Santana."

Let me just be one to say, that after some of the asinine statements you made last night, nobody really cares about your opinion on any baseball matter.

The same guy who reported the Garza/Young trade said that "several names have been kicked around during talks, including lefthander Jon Lester, shortstop Jed Lowrie, outfielder Brandon Moss and major leaguers Coco Crisp and Kevin Youkilis (note: got the impression that Youkilis’ name was barely kicked around)."

I hadn't heard Lowrie, Moss or Youkilis mentioned before.

Maybe the Sox would consider Youk because he's just reached arbitration? That doesn't seem right -all the rumors out of Boston are that the Sox will try to sign Youkilis to a long-term deal this offseason. I think they'd be stupid to trade him, he's an OBP machine and incredible defensively.

Lowrie has huge upside, but I could see him going. Moss is no more than a 4th OF, really.

nrmax88,

You are a jackass, enough said.

Dark,

You made a very good point. It appears ole Mr. Johnson may have been on the juice considering he dominated after the age of 36 but was good in his "prime."

Originally, Gammons stated it would only take Kennedy, Cabrera and a B+ prospect but now it appears it is going to take Hughes, Cabrera, Jackson and/or Tabata to get this done.

YSkip,

I’m not trying to imply that Johnson was on steroids at all ~ I’m pointing out the fact that the “great” starters people generally think about generally aren’t even that “great” until after the age of 30.

Pedros best season was 28 and he didn’t suffer afterward till he started getting hurt all the time. Smoltz got dramatically better at the age of 29 despite a couple years of declining stats. Same exact goes for Glavine. Jack Morris got much better at 30; no one really cared too much about a 2YR declining Schilling until he turned 28… Nolan Ryan really took off after 32/33…

The true “great” pitchers just get better after that age for some reason, and a good chunk of them see their real “peaks” in the 30-34 range ~ I don’t know why, but it is the case… With the “best” pitchers being better after 28-30 though, wouldn’t we be expecting Santana to get even better from this point on? People here say he should regress, where is there history of that in the game? The evidence of comparables is available to us all, most of the “greats” seem to get better after that 28-30 age…

NOOOOO!!!

SAVE PHIL HUGHES PLEASE!

Disclaimer:

I'm the biggest Phil Hughes fanboy on this blog. Thank you.

Dark,

I didn't mean to imply you were saying he was juicing. I am saying that. He absolutely dominated from the age of 29-38, especially the 35-38 years. A lot like ole Roger Clemens. I am afraid Clemens among other top pitchers will be named in the Mitchell report. You were right about him not "peaking" until after 30 though, I just think he had some help.

I don't know why the Twins still want Cabrera when the deal for Young and Pridie is about to go down.

Good, let those two compete over Santana and presumably over pay for him, and then in 2 years the Twins can win the WS with stud pitching, and elite young hitting.

Why would the Twins want Melky if this Delmon Young trade goes through. They are getting a CF in that trade also. Maybe if the Sox did offer Youk, Lowrie, and Moss I could see that but they would most likely have to throw in Hagadone or another good pitching prospect.

Because that CF may not pan out, and he may not even be ready at the start of the season.

Today Angels owner Arte Moreno said that twice he felt the team had a deal put together to acquire Miggy Cabrera and each time the Marlins switched the terms of the deal at the last minute. He said he's becoming increasingly frustrated with the Fish.

http://losangeles.angels.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20071128&content_id=2313285&vkey=news_ana&fext=.jsp&c_id=ana

The only pitcher I would compare Johan Santana with age and number with is Pedro Martinez in his prime in 1999-2000, when Pedro was at his most dominant. Randy Johnson didn't become the monster he was until his mid 30s, after years of patience and coaching by the Mariners. Both Pedro and Johan are wicked because they don't tip their pitches and use the same throwing motion for their change up and fastball. Seeing how Santana can get so many strikeout by getting batters to chase his slider, the guy is still the best pitcher in baseball, but anything can happened with injury and the loss of velocity in the future.

so right now even though the Twins will soon have Delmon Young they still want to get Melky Cabrera from NY?

the Red Sox would be leading if they would include Ellsbury with Lester?
i would think the Red Sox must know that if they dont include Ellsbury then its likely Santana goes to NY, so wouldnt one think the Sox should include Ellsbury with Lester for Santana just to keep him away from NY.

Why would any team deal with the Marlins, I have no idea, I always thought Tampa Bay was a badly run club, but now that race is between the Marlins and the Pirates. I think the Angels will get Miguel Cabrera, and it they don't they will make some deal with the Orioles for Tejada. Worst case scenario, pick up Rolen, and pray he will have a season as he did in 2004.

It looks like if the Red Sox lose the Santana race with the Yankees, they will deal Crisps to the White Sox, or I wouldn't be surprise that they make a deal with Oakland for Haren, with Crisp, Buchholz and Moss... They could also make a three way deal with Texas giving up one of their catchers.

I haven't heard anything about Atlanta about Crisp, even though they would be a prime team in getting him, and a place to help his BA/OBP.

I'll be your VP, Henry. The beauty of the Cashman era is that he's never traded away a prospect that has come back to completely bite us in the ass like, say, a Hanley Ramirez. If Hughes gets traded, we'll have our Hanley Ramirez. No doubt about it. Keep Hughes and offer the Kennedy, Cabrera/Jackson and two more arms package for Santana/Sabathia/Bedard/Haren and see which team bites. If none do, move on. Like you said (I think), next year we can pick up either Santana or Sabathia for just a 1st rounder. Patience, patience, patience ...

Amen Not Joe Morgan:

I'd rather lose Cano before Hughes.

I'd say offer up:

Kennedy (legit MLB starter)

Horne (will be ready soon and is very underrated)

Melky (I have no idea why the Twins want him, but hey have him by all means)

One more.

If it's a starting pitcher, it can be Kontos/McCallister/White/Marquez.

If it's relief: Cox or Melancon.

If it's hitting: Gardner (ridiculous OBP #s), Jackson, Tabata, Betemit.

If it's defense: Alberto Gonzalez who's apparently a wizard (i.e. would replace Jeter right now at SS if someone had the balls to move him to CF or something).

"or I wouldn't be surprise that they make a deal with Oakland for Haren, with Crisp, Buchholz and Moss... "

Umm. No.

Henry: You may have lost me at Cano; too good at way too shallow of a position. You can't buy a 2B right now even if you want to. I am with you on Melky not being a deal breaker at any point except that I worry what trading him leads to. I am not at all interested in Aaron Rowand on a 5 year deal. The time for giving good but not nearly great veterans long term, well above logic prices needs to be over. (This is where my Corey Patterson fetish would take off. Trade Melky as part of this deal and give Patterson a one or two year deal to man the position until A-Jax is ready. Great glove, very good speed and, if he hits out of the 9th hole, even better.)

SucksAtLife: I wonder if Buchholz would consider that trade a "steal".

Since the Twins have an outfield now, why would they want Ellsbury over, say, Buchholz? Even then, I can't really imagine a Hughes/Melky/Horne package wouldn't still top that.

Delmon Young will play LF for the Twins. They still need a CF and an infielder (or two).

The Yanks still can offer Hughes and Cabrera, plus a couple prospects. It's not clear the Red Sox will offer more than that. Would the Twins prefer Hughes, Cabrera, Jackson or Crisp, Buccholz, Lowrie? I have no idea.

As a Twins fan, I think Cabrera is overrated and so, while Hughes is good, the Yankees don't have enough in addition. Well, Cano and Hughes would get it done, but they won't offer that.

The Red Sox could give the Twins both a starting CF in Crisp (of course the Twins would prefer Ellsbury) and a starting 2nd baseman in Jed Lowrie. Neither of those guys are impact players, but they fill holes cheaply.

I like the Buchholz, Lowrie, and Crisp trade better than Hughes, Cabrera, and Jackson.

I think Lowrie is underrated. 68 XBH in 133 games with a .380 OBP between AA/AAA last season as a 2B/SS. Other than Ellsbury's sept and WS (increase in name recognition), I don't see alot of seperation between the 2.

I consider Crisp and Cabrera close enough to be a wash. Cabrera is cheaper with a little more potential, but Crisp is a superior fielder (deserving of a GG).

Even better would be getting Lars Anderson in addition to the rest of the deal to restock the Twins MiLB system. He looks like a real nice prospect.

"Delmon Young will play LF for the Twins. They still need a CF and an infielder (or two)."

Have you ever seen him play? Jesus.

"I like the Buchholz, Lowrie, and Crisp trade better than Hughes, Cabrera, and Jackson.

I think Lowrie is underrated. 68 XBH in 133 games with a .380 OBP between AA/AAA last season as a 2B/SS. Other than Ellsbury's sept and WS (increase in name recognition), I don't see alot of seperation between the 2.

I consider Crisp and Cabrera close enough to be a wash. Cabrera is cheaper with a little more potential, but Crisp is a superior fielder (deserving of a GG).

Even better would be getting Lars Anderson in addition to the rest of the deal to restock the Twins MiLB system. He looks like a real nice prospect."

I will suckle Clayboy on my own man-teat I love him that much, and I can still acknowledge Hughes has a higher upside if he has an owner/manager who doesn't shred his arm. Him being younger and in a more injury prone time period seriously needs to be taken into account in all weighted worth conversations.

Anyone who ever even slighly contemplates the idea that Melky Cabrera has an much worth as Coco Crisp is a complete and utter fool. This isn't homerism talking here, Melky Cabrera is a 4th outfield AT *(&#(%R*&#(*%(*&#% best. Yet again we get to ages when contemplating trade value. Even if Melky proves me and everyoneelse with a frontal lobe wrong he won't be under contract during his prime years. He may make a huge leap in development and turn into league average(thats what his HUGE leap will make him) then you pay him a buttload more in arbitration years. Coco Crisp has more value than Tori Hunter right now when you factor in contracts, and everything else.

I've been saying this for a while now Jed Lowrie is going to be a hell of player for someone unfortunately because of Lugo it won't be in Boston. Though you busting out "I don't see alot of seperation between the 2." is just flat out foolish.

Ellsbury is Johnny Damon. The first six years of that mans career purely on the field, is mammoth. When you add the marketing value that comes along with having such a sexy dude play Andruw Jones CF for 6 years, its just mind boggling.

A Kennedy, Melky, Austin Jackson deal is a complete and utter joke when compared to a Lester, Coco, Lowrie deal. Let alone when a Buchholz or an Ellsbury is involved.

I still am not convinced Joba is going to be a good starter, but if Joba is added to that deal I can see the appeal for the Twinkies. Adding Hughes, just kills it.

Before anyone MFY fan adds Tabata to the equation I want your opinion on Oscar Tejeda, they are basically the same player.

As for Lars Anderson, the Sox had the choice to spend on Matt LaPorta and Lars Anderson, they chose Lars. In hindsight they might have made the wrong choice, but thats still up in the air. I still say you spend the money for both. But when you bring in the context of the draft, and dollars it shows how much they value Lars. We who follow Red Sox minor leaguers get a little weak in the knees thinking about him in Fenway, crushing pitches to around the Ted Williams Red seat on a regular basis. He is not a throw in, in any deal ever.

For those of you knocking Melky you seem to be forgetting that he is only 22. Baseball Prospectus has him projecting higher than Ellsbury, with Melky at a nearly 50% likelihood of reaching "Star" level in three years.

Cabrera - http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/cabreme01.php

Ellsbury - http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pecota/ELLSBURY19830911A.php

"I've been saying this for a while now Jed Lowrie is going to be a hell of player for someone unfortunately because of Lugo it won't be in Boston."

Here's what I hope happens: The Sox keep Lugo for another year. He has a decent comeback year (it would be hard for him to get WORSE), and then after 2008 the Sox trade him to an NL team where he'll probably be better. The Sox pick up $4m for each of his final two years, and get a couple decent prospects in return, or one ML-ready guy. The Sox promote Lowrie, who's got another year of development behind him, and pay him league minimum for three years: for each of the two remaining years of Lugo's contract, they pay a total of less than $4.5m for SS, and Lowrie will probably produce considerably better than Lugo.

If the Red Socks dump Crisp and Lester on the Twins and end up with Santana, I am never going to watch another baseball game or join another fantasy league ever again. Thank you.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.