![]() |
|
|
| |
« The Mahay Market | Main | Teams Interested In Luis Gonzalez »
UPDATE, 12-5-07 at 5:45pm: Billy Beane, who rarely comments on trade rumors, actually went out of his way to call mine below a "total fabrication." I guess I should be proud, right? I was the subject of an elaborate hoax/impersonated sportswriter (thanks, Fake John Delcos!). I apologize - not sure why someone would go to such lengths, but lesson learned.
FROM 12-5-07 at 3:36pm:
Just got an incredible rumor from a trusted New York sportswriter. Stay with me, because this one's crazy. But rest assured that if the source wasn't good, I wouldn't post it.
Minnesota has initiated talks for a three-way blockbuster with the Twins and A's. Here's how it would go down:
Mets send Jose Reyes, Kevin Mulvey to A's
Mets send Hector Pellot to Twins
A's send Bobby Crosby and Dan Johnson to Mets
A's send Dan Haren to Twins
Twins send Johan Santana to Mets
Mets get Johan Santana, Bobby Crosby and Dan Johnson
A's get Jose Reyes and Kevin Mulvey
Twins get Dan Haren and Hector Pellot
The source says Haren is exactly the type of player the Twins want for Santana, a cheap frontline starter. It's known the Mets would hate to deal Reyes but they would get some value beyond Santana. Billy Beane is happy because he gets Reyes for one more year than he had Haren plus longtime favorite Mulvey. And, he's out of Crosby's contract.
Thoughts?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534b3a784970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Santana/Reyes/Haren Rumor Quashed:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
And now people are saying Santana is only marginally better than Haren?
You guys are crazy.
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 04:12 PM
DC could sweeten the deal by putting the Wonder Twins and the Atom in the mix
and Spidey doesn't care where he spins his web (Boras wants 10/350 for his client)
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 04:12 PM
Why didn't you state a sorce? This must be a joke.
Posted by: C-Gouds' UltimateBaseball | December 05, 2007 at 04:13 PM
I don't know many of these prospects, or the farm system for thee teams, but I would thin Santana is the biggest piece moving (barely above Reyes) and they should at least get another prospect back. Like I said I donno how good Pellot is, but if I were them I would want a third player.
Posted by: NGGriffey | December 05, 2007 at 04:13 PM
This is nuts for a few reasons:
1) The Mets said they wouldn't trade Reyes, no matter what
2) The Twins had a better offer on the table for Santana
3) The A's get a guy who never walks, totally out of Beane's M.O.
4) The Twins royally get the shaft
5) The A's wanted more than that for Haren
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | December 05, 2007 at 04:13 PM
The fact that this trade is on a website and is known proves that it isn't going to happen. These blockbusters and all their pieces are never fully known.
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | December 05, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Tim, if this deal goes through, quit your day job. Breaking the biggest trade of the off-season would make Rosenthal your bitch.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | December 05, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Holy crap.
I... I could see something along these lines happening, but something's got to sweeten the pot for the Twins. At least one more prospect. Unless they then plan to flip Haren?
*brain explodes*
Posted by: MommyWannabe | December 05, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Well, now the're just unloading the whole farm system. gonna kill the future with that one
Posted by: jimmie | December 05, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Twins are definitely not getting enough for Santana...
Posted by: celipliz | December 05, 2007 at 04:17 PM
Wait... after re-reading, I see that it was a NY sportswriter. And who comes out ahead in this deal? Gee... Could it be hype?
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | December 05, 2007 at 04:17 PM
THIS JUST IN..
Dark Horse Comics is pulling out of the deal.. Spidey will stay with Marvel for 08
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 04:17 PM
This is rediculous. Haren and no name is NOT better than what the Sox are offering. I just think that the twinkies are playing and probably have already sent him to Boston and they are just trying to gain attention for it. but this is getting stupid.
Posted by: jondogg1985 | December 05, 2007 at 04:18 PM
While we are at it Help Minnesota fill a few holes and Mets can fill two of theirs.
For fun:
Reyes, Mulvey and Pellot for Santana and Nathan.
Mets sign Ecestein for Short. Sign Rowand for Right trade away Church for more bullpen.
Posted by: vader2112 | December 05, 2007 at 04:20 PM
GoBoSox420...
What do you think is a fair return for Santana in a straight up trade?
In Honor of 34..
The Twins don’t really need much in the outfield after the trade with the Rays. I think the twins are getting as much return as they can now so when they move in to their new stadium they will be ready to be a serious competitor
My personal feeling is that the Sox could trade Buchholz, Elsbury, and Lester and still do well. First they will make up for the additional payroll in Playoff and World Series money. With Santana, Beckett, Dice K, Schilling, and me pitching they would win probably the next 3 WS with out an issue. After all I do have a mean 80 mph fast ball and a minus minus curve too.
Posted by: Bleacher_Buddha | December 05, 2007 at 04:20 PM
Why would Minny do this?
Why would Oakland do this?
Of coarse, has to come from a met fan.
If any one of you fall for this crap, you need to get your head examine.
Posted by: PhillyRocks | December 05, 2007 at 04:21 PM
It seems like fans of all three teams hate this rumor, which is generally the surest sign that it might be fair for all sides...
I think this makes a ton of sense for the Twins, actually. Haren would still be on the squad, one of the top-2 starters, in 2010 when their new ballpark opens, and given their stellar reputation, I assume the A-ball guy they'd be getting will be a player by then, too.
With the money they'd save, they'd also be able to go after a bat or two to fill their remaining holes. Or they could pursue Coco Crisp in a follow-up deal.
The bottom line is that the Twins are still pretty close to playoff contention, right now, in the AL, and this deal would give them the flexibility to fill their remaining holes now, while remaining a contender in the future.
Posted by: LA_33 | December 05, 2007 at 04:22 PM
Why would the Twins want to do this? Haren is a pretty big step below Santana, and Pellot really wouldn't be too helpful for them. I just don't see the Twins making a move like this without getting a shortstop or a centerfielder back.
This deal would be fantastic for the other two teams though. Jose Reyes is an incredible athlete and could be the face of that franchise, and Kevin Mulvey is a very good pitching prospect. Not only that but Johnson has nearly zero value, Crosby gets paid to be hurt most of the time, and no way you get Reyes for Dan Haren. Meanwhile the Mets get Santana, their big time ace, as well as a replacement for Reyes in Crosby, and someone who could let Delgado rest on occasion as age starts to bring down his performance.
Seems like Minnesota could do better though, especially considering this whole situation would be repeated in 2 years when Haren closes in on free agency as well. I feel like Lester, Crisp, Lowrie, Masterson helps this team out more, unless Bill Smith genuinely thinks his team can beat the Indians or Tigers next season, which seems incredibly unlikely
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2007 at 04:24 PM
sounds like junk as a twinks fan we get none of our needs filled
Posted by: patsfanatic83 | December 05, 2007 at 04:24 PM
Look out for pokemon swooping in and taking spiderman overseas
Posted by: jimmie | December 05, 2007 at 04:25 PM
This is the worst 3 way trade I've ever seen.
Posted by: RuffinTumble | December 05, 2007 at 04:25 PM
you know wat i think about this deal , i doubt its going to happen the mets would be stupid to give up one of there best players o well idc about the mets and twins so let them mess up there team o well
Posted by: cubsworldserieschamps08 | December 05, 2007 at 04:26 PM
"pokemon swooping in and taking spiderman overseas"
nah, they'd have to pay a large posting fee just to 'talk' to Pokemon
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 04:27 PM
Not sure if someone mentioned it, but what we really have here is this:
Mets trade Jose Reyes, Kevin Mulvey and Hector Pellot to the Twins for Johan Santana & 2X PTNL
The Twins then turn around and trade Reyes and Mulvey to the A’s for Haren, Bobby Crosby & Dan Johnson… Crosby & Johnson are sent to Mets as the 2 PTNLs
…My question, why wouldn’t the Twins just keep Reyes, Mulvey & Pellot??? Doesn’t that fit their needs more than Haren + Pellot would?
Santana + maybe Harris for Reyes + Mulvey + Pellot would probably satisfy the Mets wants just the same as Santana + Crosby + Johnson. Why is Oakland even involved???
I don’t think this one makes sense at all…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | December 05, 2007 at 04:28 PM
Don't buy Rosenthal that collar and chew-toy just yet...lol
WFAN just reporting the same as above, with the additional "...and the Twins are entertaining offers that DO NOT INCLUDE Jose Reyes."
It's FAN, for whatever that's worth, but I think this one is losing steam rapidly.
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 05, 2007 at 04:32 PM
Sounds like a good deal. Of course, I'm a Sox fan. Git r dun!
Posted by: astralpanda | December 05, 2007 at 04:32 PM
True. If the Twins saw that the Mets were even willing to deal Reyes, wouldn't they come in and say hey lets leave the A's out of this and we'll take Reyes and Mulvey. This just seems like a stretch
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2007 at 04:33 PM
You know, I have to wonder if this is a bluff being spread by the Twins (and maybe the A's).
Think about it. If this deal goes down, both Santana and Haren are off the market. Peter Angelos has made it very, very clear that Bedard will not be traded within the division. Just like that, the Yankees (and to a lesser extent, the Sox) are SOL. Oh, and Steinbrenner has been shown up by the Mets.
Could they be trying to get Hank to pull the trigger?
Posted by: MommyWannabe | December 05, 2007 at 04:34 PM
If the Mets were giving up Gomez to Minnesota instead of Pellot, then maybe we'd be working with something.
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 05, 2007 at 04:34 PM
this is single handedly the stupidest thing i have seen so far this off-season
Posted by: beaminack | December 05, 2007 at 04:34 PM
The Twins need to find another run per game of offense. A swap of a starter for a starter leaves them right back where they were last year. Starting pitching is a strength not a weakness. They need to upgrade their position players and bench depth.
Posted by: New York Twin | December 05, 2007 at 04:35 PM
no offense of course
keep them coming tim
Posted by: beaminack | December 05, 2007 at 04:35 PM
lmao Crosby?...i'd rather trade Reyes for Santana then sign Eckstein...
Posted by: Zemonstar | December 05, 2007 at 04:37 PM
if im the mets i do the trade and then sign eckstein
Posted by: delaneja | December 05, 2007 at 04:37 PM
I'm a Twins fan. I take this deal in a heartbeat. We basically defer the "ace leaving via free agency" concept one year and get a shot to compete with a dominant rotation. This time next year the Twins would be in the same spot with Haren. They probably wouldn't get as impressive of offers for him as Santana, but at least it's not nearly as bad of a fire sale.
Posted by: Harvaris | December 05, 2007 at 04:38 PM
This doesn't seem to me like a good move for the mets most of all. why would you trade the next premeir shortstop in baseball. This kid is getting better every year. We are talking about the first major base stealer of this proportion since ricky henderson. This leaves lots of opportunites for david wright and carlos beltran. Bobby crosby is good, but i believe the mets offense would suffer DRAMATICALLY without reyes stealing second every time on base.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 05, 2007 at 04:42 PM
Hey I hear their is a new rumor out their tiight now involving the Mets. Anyone hear this?
"New York Mets acquired pitcher Scott Kazmir and outfielder Rocco Baldelli in exchange for pitchers, Mike Pelfrey and Joe Smith, recently acquired outfielder, Ryan Church, and two minor leaguers.
Sounds like a hoax!
Posted by: vader2112 | December 05, 2007 at 04:42 PM
thanks for reading my mind delaneja :o
Posted by: Zemonstar | December 05, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Question ... why would the Twins be involved? If the A's want Reyes, and the Mets want a SP, why don't they trade Haren, Crosby and Johnson for Reyes, Mulvey and Pellot? Oh, and I don't think there's any way Beane does that deal considering his asking price for Haren straight up to this point.
I don't see this happening unless something dramatic changes. I really don't see why the Twins would even need to be involved.
Posted by: AJ | December 05, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Santana/Beckett FTW couldn't have said it better...As reyes goes the mets go. he can score without getting a hit. He's worth too many runs
Posted by: Zemonstar | December 05, 2007 at 04:47 PM
i think this trade makes alot of sense. Santana is happy now, A's get a bat, and the Twins still have an ace.
some may say that twins get screwed with Haren, but i think you could get more for Haren than Santana if you spin him off right after the deal. teams will till be interested in Haren and he'll have 3 years left on his contract.
this trade works great for everyone but the Mets. sure they get Santana, but they would lose Reyes, and they would never ever do that. too bad, i want this to go down
Posted by: *Joba Rules* | December 05, 2007 at 04:48 PM
Harvaris - Then you'd be a retard.
The yanks and Sox have offered way better deals to the twins for this.
And face it, the twins are going to be competing with anyone next year.
Posted by: opes | December 05, 2007 at 04:49 PM
The only way this goes down is if the Red Sox and Yankees have both pulled offers off the table.
Once you get away from the Red Sox and Yankees bidding against each other anything can happen, just like with A-Rod...
Posted by: astrosfan | December 05, 2007 at 04:49 PM
Vader- Definitely sounds like a hoax. Kaz is not going back to the Mets and the Rays aren't going to trade thier ace for a guy who refused to sign with them when drafted out of high school (Pelfrey). Hardcore Rays fans remember that and LOVED roughing up Pelfrey in the last spring training game of 2007, ecen though it was only spring training.
Posted by: DRayDude | December 05, 2007 at 04:52 PM
"Hey I hear their is a new rumor out their tiight now involving the Mets. Anyone hear this?
"New York Mets acquired pitcher Scott Kazmir and outfielder Rocco Baldelli in exchange for pitchers, Mike Pelfrey and Joe Smith, recently acquired outfielder, Ryan Church, and two minor leaguers."
Uhh what the hell. This deal is most definately not true. Unless those two "minor leaguers" happen to be 2 of Fernando Martinez, Carlos Gomez, or Deolis Guerra, then this offer is just too stupid to even consider.
"The yanks and Sox have offered way better deals to the twins for this."
There's another way to look at this though, if Haren continued to pitch this way, then when the Twins would be forced to deal Haren before he hits free agency, they could get a bounty close to even with that of Santana. I still think the deal doesn't really make sense, but thats one angle to consider..
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2007 at 04:55 PM
Mets easily win in this deal. Sounds like this NY writer is being a complete homer and creating a deal benefiting his team.
Posted by: SirScore | December 05, 2007 at 04:56 PM
AJ -- I could be wrong, but if I had to guess, it would have to be partially a PR move. If the Mets were to give up Reyes they would have to get back Santana in return, or the fans would start burning buildings to the ground.
Still think this is pretty out there, but I could explain the Mets side of it that way.
Posted by: MommyWannabe | December 05, 2007 at 04:56 PM
well this is something right off the hot stove. i think that the twins would have gotten a better deal if they dealt with the red sox. a 4-1 deal with a young lefty starter (Lester), and a veteran center fielder which they def. need would have been the way to go. And the Mets losing there up and coming franchise player to the A's...i dont know who makes out better on this deal...to much tossing around of big names to decide
Posted by: Gnest | December 05, 2007 at 04:57 PM
I dont think this rumor is legit. Not enough prospects involved for 3 all stars being traded.
Posted by: Brian | December 05, 2007 at 05:00 PM
The A's are getting the short end of the stick in this deal, and the Twins still need to address some of position player problems. They are getting Haren and a A+league player for Santana?!?!? and leaving on the table a four player deal, with two major leaguers, and two top prospects?!?!??!?
The A's get a great shortstop and a minor league pitcher for Haren?!?!? who has one year of AAA ball!!! and it was okay at that?
Nice rumor, but given the demands that the Twins are asking for Santana, top prospects, etc, and I doubt the A's are going to settle for this in a trade for Haren, My guess this is coming from a Mets fan to see if it is possible to get Santana, the Mets are the obvious hands down winner in the trade getting the best pitcher in baseball and two proven players for trading two minor league player and top tier player.
the Twins and Oakland are getting shafted if they take this deal, especially if the Twins get two players for Santana, Haren or no Haren.
Posted by: okojo | December 05, 2007 at 05:03 PM
Tim,
How mentally stable is this writer?
Posted by: Positive/Negative | December 05, 2007 at 05:07 PM
Jose Reyes is far too valuable to the Mets offensively and defensively for them to move him.
Look at Minaya's great moves in the past. The guy is an idiot.
Posted by: Justin | December 05, 2007 at 05:09 PM
dude i would do anything to get any of the aces on the trading block.but really i wouldnt trade reyes okay. i was thinking the twins wanted an in fielder right thats why they wanted Reyes so mabey they should just substitute Ruben Gotay i mean hes pretty good he batted .295 and although he did not play every day he is just as young as Reyes...... by like a year. so it would be like this mike pelfrey, ruben gotay and aaron heilman and mabey a minor leaguer. thats the best i can do. but seriously i would not trade reyes!
Posted by: metsfan4life | December 05, 2007 at 05:10 PM
"so it would be like this mike pelfrey, ruben gotay and aaron heilman and mabey a minor leaguer"
Uhh no way. If the Mets want an ace, they're gonna have to open to dealing IMO at least 2 of their best prospects (Gomez, Martinez, Guerra, Mulvey). And even comparing Gotay and Reyes is stupid. Your only basis is that they're both young infielders. Thats it. You wouldn't even get a Joe Blanton with the offer you stated
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2007 at 05:18 PM
This deal makes less sense for the A's the more I think about it, to be honest.
The A's lose Haren, and granted that Crosby and DJ don't really matter much to the A's, but they are still losing them as well.
And in return, they get a Pitching Prospect and a Short Stop who hit .280/.354/.421/.775 last year and has a career line of .284/.330/.426/.756.
I guess I got caught up in the hype of Reyes, cause when I look at his numbers now, they look like crap compared to his reputation. He doesn't walk, he doesn't hit for a lot of power... so why would the A's trade an Ace, under control for 3 years on the cheap, for Reyes? Mark Ellis had a higher OPS last year, and he plays in the Harder league!
I don't think the A's are going to deal Haren. They keep being lowballed by teams, ala Arizona who refuse to part with any of their 5 good prospects yet expect to acquire Haren.
Posted by: Zonis | December 05, 2007 at 05:33 PM
http://www.baseball-reference.com/r/reyesjo01.shtml
Looking at Reyes' most comparable hitters... #1 on the list is...
Similar Batters
Mark Ellis (933)
Orlando Hudson (933)
Fresco Thompson (924)
Cotton Tierney (924)
Solly Hemus (922)
Butch Henline (921)
John Castino (917)
Tony Piet (916)
Fred Carroll (914)
Jocko Milligan (914)
Posted by: Zonis | December 05, 2007 at 05:35 PM
To preface; I don't believe this will happen or really even the validity of this ever being talked about by the GM's involved. However, if you take out all the peripheral players and leave the 3 marquee players, it makes sense to some degree (providing that later on the mets make other moves, the twins trade closer, a's trade blanton and/or street). You really have to consider the contracts involved. Jose Reyes and Dan Haren have 2 of the best contracts in baseball: Reyes 3 for 18 and Haren 3 for 16 roughly. In those 3 years the Mets would be paying about 60 mil at the lower end of the spectrum. This evens things to a huge degree.
The Twins are in a much stronger position with a debatably(by others than me) equal starting ace who costs 40 odd less million for the next 3 years. If they want to turn around and trade haren for a slew of minor leaguers then they could if they wanted. The A's get a premiere position player and a valid blue chip pitching prospect (or close to blue). The mets get debatably the best pitcher in baseball but a huge contract (which they can afford) and have to trade a cornerstone player. On the other hand, with only giving mulvey away, the mets can develop the pitchers they retain and they still have heilman, gomez, fernando etc... I could see the twins want one more prospect but not an amazing one. Haren is a very solid pitcher. I wouldn't like to see Reyes leave the Mets, but their starting rotation leaves a little too much room for worry.
The only way this trade really would happen is if the peripheral players changed, i think.
Posted by: darkellipses | December 05, 2007 at 05:51 PM
THIS JUST IN!
Spidey/Green Lantern/Blade Blockbuster Quashed
i told ya Spidey's gonna stay with Marvel in 08
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 05:53 PM
I smell METS Fanatic on this one!
Posted by: djperalta | December 05, 2007 at 05:56 PM
u know that is very true i forgot carlos gomez. and mulvey. but there is no way i would keep martinez and gomez in the same trade. but it is johan santana so i will make an exceptions but i would keep gotay in that package cause as i said the twins seek a infielderand young pitching ever since they got delmon young they dont need a center fielder.
Posted by: metsfan4life | December 05, 2007 at 05:57 PM
Tim's just trying to generate more AD REVENUE!!! ;)
Posted by: el clash combo | December 05, 2007 at 06:06 PM
Doesn't the banner say "If it's whispered we hear it?"
A ton of 'credible' reporters have been correcting themselves all day. If you don't like rumormongering, don't come here...
And just because a GM says something was completely false doesn't mean it was...
Posted by: Dave | December 05, 2007 at 07:22 PM
Good thing it was wrong. That deal would fuckingg suck.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 05, 2007 at 08:18 PM
WOW, made it all the way to MLB.com...nice!
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20071205&content_id=2319119&vkey=news_oak&fext=.jsp&c_id=oak
Posted by: djperalta | December 05, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Quashed isn't a word. I think you mean Squashed.
This would also never happen. Billy Beane is too smart to give up Haren, Crosby and Johnson for Reyes and a prospect. Maybe Haren for Reyes.
Posted by: the_brewster | December 05, 2007 at 10:35 PM
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/quashed
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 05, 2007 at 11:26 PM
trade would never ever happen.
Mets would never trade Reyes unless they got Haren and Santana. Dan Johnson has no value for the Mets as they are stuck with Delgado
Jose Reyes isn't going anywhere
Posted by: oleosmirf | December 06, 2007 at 01:00 AM
I know I would be proud of the Beane quotes. Even in a worst case scenario it shows you that the website has substantial pull. The hoax sounds like an interesting story by itself.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 06, 2007 at 01:06 AM
In hindsight I was pretty naive to believe it, guess I just got caught up in the excitement.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 06, 2007 at 01:18 AM
that's what's so awesome about how this rumour mushroomed...shows you what kind of power the internet and the blogosphere has on the world right now when something can go from this site to creating serious buzz among the baseball professionals themselves gathered at an event like the winter meeting.
Take heart, shows you your site is being paid attention to and has some very serious legs!
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 06, 2007 at 02:44 PM