![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Wilder, Vlad, Jose Reyes | Main | Markakis To Talk Extension After Season? »
One player whose stock has risen in '08 is Cubs starter Ryan Dempster. The 31 year-old hadn't started regularly since '03, but he currently sports a 5-1 record with a 2.35 ERA. He's earning $5.5MM in the last year of a three-year extension.
Part of Dempster's success can be attributed to his .211 BABIP, lowest in the league. As a team the Cubs have a .277 BABIP, and something around there would be a more reasonable expectation moving forward. On the plus side, Dempster's 55% groundball rate ranks seventh in the NL, and it's helped him keep the ball in the yard. He has a solid strikeout rate and has been making improvements on a subpar walk rate.
The Cubs have treated Dempster well, taking him on as a reclamation project and later giving him an extension at full market value. Perhaps he'll choose to continue the relationship. A three-year deal in the $30-35MM range seems fair.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e552560bae8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Free Agent Stock Watch: Ryan Dempster:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Hmmm. I still think a mid-season implosion is possible for Dempster but if he proves he can stay healthy and eat some innings then I'd say 8-10 mil for 3 years is reasonable but not 12 mil per.
Posted by: arsmitty30 | May 19, 2008 at 01:41 PM
I agree. I think that Dempster could work out to be a number 2 starter in the rotation. Let's see how the next few months go before we start throwing numbers out there. If he continues to be as successful all season as he has the first 7 weeks, then 30 mil for three years may not be too bad. That's Ted Lilly money and is a fair value considering his age.
Posted by: cubbieblue86 | May 19, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Wrigley Field is 2 different parks depending on time of year. Let's wait until the warm summer months, when the wind is blowing out regularly, to judge Dempster's worth.
In my opinion, the Cubs will need to upgrade their rotation this summer to maximize a "win now" approach. Dempster will be revealed as more of a place holder or an "innings eater" at the backend the rotation once park conditions change.
Posted by: Gov Arnold | May 19, 2008 at 02:38 PM
if i remember correctly, elias considered dempster a type B before this year. If he acheives type A free agent status I would rather see dempster walk and try to get a few draft picks.
Posted by: integr96 | May 19, 2008 at 03:03 PM
I don't see the logic in giving Dempster $30+ Million, unless Hill does not come back around and Gallagher doesn't work out.
Posted by: thenockmlb | May 19, 2008 at 03:07 PM
"if i remember correctly, elias considered dempster a type B before this year. If he acheives type A free agent status I would rather see dempster walk and try to get a few draft picks."
You beat me to it! The Cubs should let him go if he obtains type A status. Nearly all of their good prospects are no longer prospects, meaning they really need some lower level talent. They are going to have a pretty good amount of early picks this year (Kendall was a type B!), and we know that Howry will almost certainly be a type A, so their number of picks are looking good right now. They need to rebuild the bottom of their farm, and this seems like the way to do it.
I do agree though, they need Gallagher or Hill to come through in order to feel comfortable about letting Dempster go.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 19, 2008 at 03:20 PM
Here are the Elias rankings:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/nl/2007-10-31-elias-rankings-complete_N.htm
And how they are calculated:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/10/stats-used-for-.html
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | May 19, 2008 at 03:35 PM
Dempster is not going to be a #2 for us. He will be a #3-#5 guy for us and I think he will stay in Chicago. Dempster is 30 years old now, but since he was only a relief pitcher for the last 5 years, his arm has actually been saved some. So I believe (which doesnt mean much) that he still has many good years left on his arm and maybe another all-star year.
Posted by: uww1 | May 19, 2008 at 03:51 PM
"Position is designated as the position at which the player appeared the most over the last two seasons."
Doesn't this mean that Dempster will almost certainly be classified as a reliver, because appearences would be more from last year than this?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 19, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Letting him walk for a 1st round (not supplemental pick) is risky. No guarantee that a top 15 team would pick him up. In fact, if he was priced moderately ($8-10m/season) he becomes even more attractive to the bottom tier teams.
Posted by: bjsguess | May 19, 2008 at 04:23 PM
What ever happened to Angel Guzman? Is he close to MLB ready? I remember when he was the Cubs best prospect.
Posted by: CUBBIES2008 | May 19, 2008 at 04:37 PM
bjsguess has a good point. Dempster will likely be priced at a point where almost any team can afford him, and he would be attractive to a Minnesota or Kansas City.
Posted by: AA | May 19, 2008 at 04:46 PM
They still get the sandwich pick no matter what, right?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 19, 2008 at 04:57 PM
Guzman had tommy john last fall. He started working out at extended spring training facilities in Mesa, and is expected to start a rehab stint sometime after the all star break. Unfortunately the specifics have been kind if vague. It seems more and more like the recovery times from tj surgery have gotten longer. They used to tell players 2 years, if ever, then whittled it down to a year, but it seems like even when they come back after a year, it really takes another year before they get back into it. IMO.
Posted by: Dave | May 19, 2008 at 05:55 PM
Hill continues to struggle in Iowa. Now he's experiencing back problems. Lou said that between Marshall, Hart and Hill, "Mr. Peripheral" is currently in 3rd place. Oh, and Theriot is 2-5 tonite with a run and an RBI. Round 4 to Deke.
Posted by: Deke Martin | May 19, 2008 at 09:28 PM
"Wrigley Field is 2 different parks depending on time of year. Let's wait until the warm summer months, when the wind is blowing out regularly, to judge Dempster's worth." - But if he continues to get 55% GB, then he'll definitely prove his worth. 12 million isn't out of the question, look at the deal Carlos Silva has. Also, who else is going to be on the market. Those are things you have to consider.
And great points about the Cubs rebuilding their farm system. They really have the ability to this year, and get some quality young players.
Posted by: thecubsdontcatchtheball | May 19, 2008 at 09:59 PM
Dempster did have that one good year to be an All-Star (for the Marlins) back in the day. With how pitching are always in demand, I'm sure he'll get that $30 million deal, easy.
I actually had a chance to chat with Dempster once in a game (when he first moved to the pen and was too bored to just sit in the pen). Not that it matters that much, but he seems like a good guy (and thus a good clubhouse guy?).
Posted by: ABravesFan | May 19, 2008 at 11:38 PM
Point to the Silva deal all you want, and I'll point to the Lohse deal.
Posted by: Zoop | May 20, 2008 at 12:11 AM
As far a Dempster being a reliever or starter for Elias purposes, the key is that the definition uses the word appearance, NOT innings or some other measuring stick. While the argument can be made that after this eyar he will proabably have more innings as a starter over the last three years than as a reliever, I believe that based on the definition given Dempster is a reliever. However, if as someone pointed out Howry is a type A, then I don't see how Dempster wouldnt also be a type A, considering the massive save difference between the two. Unless elias doesnt put a lot of stock in saves, but a system that has Kendall I wouldn't expect such clear headed logic from a group that ranks Kendall as a type B free agent.
Adunc - I believe your question about sandwich picks comepletely turns on B v. A. I believe that as of the latest CBA, sandwich picks are only given for Type A free agents. a few years ago you got a sandwich between the second and third rounds for Type B free agents, but the latest CBA got rid of Type C and the Type B sandwich. I am 90% sure on that and if it hasnt happened yet, then it will be happening very shortly (next year or two).
Posted by: skkrman7482 | May 20, 2008 at 07:45 AM
skkrman7482...the latest CBA reads as follows. Type C free agents no longer exist. Type A is relegated to the top 20% of players at their respective position. Teams earn a 1st and supplemental round pick(between 1st and 2nd round) as long as the free agent is not signed by a top 15 drafting team. If a Type A is signed by a team in the top 15 of the drafting order then the team receives a supplemental pick and a 2nd round pick.
The next 20% at their respective position are considered Type B free agents. This free agent type nets the team a supplemental round pick, no matter who that player is signed by.
Posted by: integr96 | May 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM
"If a Type A is signed by a team in the top 15 of the drafting order then the team receives a supplemental pick and a 2nd round pick."
So to me, if he is a type A free agent, and the Cubs get something out of 1 of Marshall, Hill, or Gallagher that leads them to believe they can be a good rotation option, I would let Dempster go, considering that doesn't seem like that big of a risk and a great way to rebuild the system.
Howry was a type A free agent this year, so as long as he keeps that status, I would let him go as well. That would be 6 picks in the first two rounds if I am correct, right? Thats a great way to start out a draft...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 20, 2008 at 11:26 AM
We're looking at a potential $25 mil coming off of the payroll at the end of this season with Dempster, Eyre, Howry, Wood, Johnson, Edmonds, Lieber, Blanco, and Cotts (I believe, but not certain of) all being free agents.
Hendry could use that extra cash to do a couple of things. He could go after someone like Sabathia, Oliver Perez, or Burnett as a topnotch #2 guy. He could also go for someone like K-Rod, Fuentes, Juan Rincon, Rafael Soriano, or Brandon Lyon to beef up the pen. Hell, he might be able to pick up both Rincon and Perez with the savings from the guys listed above... and have enough left over to give the kids currently in place slight raises.
Posted by: Unlitedsoul | May 20, 2008 at 12:01 PM
I agree Unitedsoul. The Cubs have a good amount of leeway with the amount of money coming off the books, but also remember there is a good amount of money going to raises for current players next year(Soriano, Zambrano, Ramirez...).
With Woody coming around in the pen I would be surprised if Hendry went out and got a closer. I think they resign Wood to be the closer knowing that Marmol is there if things go wrong. The Cubs would be smart to go after Burnett as a #2 and then use whatever savings are left to get top notch talent in the draft (assuming multiple picks) or international signing period.
In case no one saw, Chad Fox went on the DL today so the Cubs called up Jose Ascanio. He has been pitching well in Iowa so I am eager to see him pitch in the bigs. He could be a perfect replacement for Howry next year. I also see Cotts being traded sometime this year. He has been pitching pretty well in Iowa and left handed relievers are always in need. The Cubs wouldn't get much back in return unless they package him with someone else.
Posted by: integr96 | May 20, 2008 at 01:24 PM
integr96:
my only issue with what you said is going after burnett... his stuff is good, but we have been burned by injury prone pitchers with good stuff before (Mark Prior). And I dont think Burnett would be much cheaper than Sabathia anyway, since I believe Boras is burnett's agent.
Posted by: skkrman7482 | May 20, 2008 at 01:45 PM
thare are definitely injury concerns with burnett... i cannot argue with you on that.
Posted by: integr96 | May 20, 2008 at 01:54 PM
integr96,
Thats good stuff. I agree with about everything you wrote. I think Burnett is a good choice for lack of better options. There is always Hardin, but thats the same problem times about 10. Other than that, there really don't seem to be many true #2 starters out there.
Funny thing about Dempster, baseball prospectus ripped Hendry for signing him, not because of the money, which was reasonable, but because they couldn't believe Hendry actually believed Dempster would stay healthy...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 20, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Chris Young would be a very good option for a #2 if available...hopefully the Pads get really, really bad.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | May 20, 2008 at 02:09 PM
integr96,
I understand that raises are going to quite a few players due to 1st and 2nd years of their current contracts being deferred. However, that's already budgeted out. I would be highly surprised that the Cubs won't push the envelope a good $10-20 million beyond what's already planned for next year.
I see Eyre going, mainly because Piniella lost faith in him last year... and he started off this season hurt. He isn't getting any younger. I also see Howry leaving, due to his struggles early on both this season and last season. Wood is a fan favorite to many... and a dud to others. IF, and that's a major if, he can make it through the season without hitting the DL and his usual wildness doesn't step up and burn him once the weather wars up in Wrigley, I think he might get an extension. However, other issues will exist in the pen. We'd still need a solid #2 pitcher.
I think there's a chance that Sabathia can be signed. Burnett I think is even more plausible considering Sabathia will be the top dog on the market... and the Yanks and Mets will both be players jacking the price up. However, either may cost us possible strength in the bullpen. While we have a number of young arms that could step up... do you really want a bullpen of 1-3 vets and 4-5 rookies (or near rookies)?
Sabathia is going to cost at least $17-18 mil per. Burnett, if he remains healthy all year, will probably be in the $15-16 mil per range. Perez, I don't think he goes much more than $12 mil per, and he only gets that if he repeats last season this year. I think Hendry could get both Perez and Rincon for around $18 mil per. The problem here, there's a good chance of having 3 lefties in the rotation... and I'm not so certain that's a good idea.
Rotation: Zambo, Perez, Lilly, Gallagher, Hill/Marquis.
Pen: Wood (maybe), Marmol, Rincon, Wuertz, Marshall, Veal (preperation for him taking Lilly's spot in the rotation), Hart/Asciano/Guzman (if healthy)/Petrick.
Also, if Hendry could move Marquis... maybe eating half of his salary... there's ab it more savings that might be able to afford Sabathia or Burnett over Perez.
Posted by: Unlitedsoul | May 20, 2008 at 02:55 PM