![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rosenthal's Latest: Cashman, Fuentes, Braves, Fielder | Main | Indians Sign Rincon, Graffanino »
Back on June 19th, ESPN's Jayson Stark said the Phillies had "at least kicked the tires on C.C. Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Bronson Arroyo, and Jarrod Washburn." He also expected them to inquire on Erik Bedard. Scott Lauber says the Phils have scouted Sabathia, Burnett, Ben Sheets, and Greg Maddux recently.
Jim Salisbury of the Philadelphia Inquirer weighs in this morning on the Phillies' trade chips. He names Shane Victorino, Jayson Werth, Carlos Carrasco, Lou Marson, Greg Golson, and Adrian Cardenas as Phillies players other teams may covet. However, Salisbury believes Pat Gillick might opt for a midlevel acquisition and hang on to his top young players. Check out our starting pitcher trade market post for ideas.
Salisbury speculates on possible targets aside from the aforementioned names: Roy Oswalt and Rich Harden. Salisbury is speculating with these names, but notes that "the Astros had a high-ranking scout in Philadelphia on Sunday."
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5536cfb3c8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Salisbury On Phillies' Trade Chips:


|
|
Well Sheets won't be available. Even if the Astros are pretenders, I'd be very surprised if Oswalt goes anywhere unless the Astros know something about his health that the rest of the league doesn't. I also think Oakland will hang around to the point that Harden will only be available for a huge offer
Washburn is garbage, Arroyo is a home-run prone fly ball pitcher, and Maddux
Burnett is the fit in my mind. I'd think hard about a Burnett-Victorino deal, maybe expanding out to include Downs and some second tier Phils prospects
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM
What other pieces from both sides would be needed for a Victorino-Arroyo swap. The reds could use a leadoff type hitter in center after Junior and Dunn leave, and the Phillies need pitching for the stretch. Seems like a good place to start.
Posted by: carolina03 | June 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Maybe I'm a homer, but I don't think the Reds would get Arroyo for Vic straight up. At least I hope they could get more for him. What's Arroyo's contract situation?
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM
No way Oswalt is traded.
Posted by: Mike Simms | June 24, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Phillies have also apparently had some interest in Freel as a bench guy/late inning Burrell caddy like Michael Bourn was last year, so maybe he could come over in an Arroyo deal. So Taguchi has been pretty awful in that role. Freel is really an ideal utility/backup guy for any contender, hard nosed, versatile, good outfield D, can pinch run and steal a base. Problem is he's not a great platoon candidate with Jenkins as he doesn't hit lefties all that well
Maybe Vic, Outman, and an A-ball guy for Freel and Arroyo?
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM
I can't understand why the Phils would shop Victorino. who plays center? Werth, aside from his injury problems, is just not defensively capable of playing CF full-time. especially after trading Bourn, I just can't see Victorino going anywhere.
and Arroyo seems like a particularly bad fit. he's already over 30, he's signed to a pretty expensive deal, and he's an extreme flyball pitcher (who got tagged for 3 HR in 4 IP in his one appearance at CBP, FWIW). if I'm the Phillies, there's just no way in hell I give up inexpensive talent like Victorino for Arroyo's $9.5M in 2009/$11M in 2010/$2M buyout in 2011 contract.
Posted by: ae | June 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Don't think Oswalt would go anywhere north of the Mason Dixon line homies. He is a strong southerner and would probably do something like Atl or something but thats about it. Just my opinion. He has a home in Al.
Posted by: AstrosCoverage.blogspot.com | June 24, 2008 at 10:33 AM
Unless someone offers to switch minor leagues systems with the Astros, Roy Oswalt will not be traded.
Posted by: kemo | June 24, 2008 at 10:44 AM
You Reds fans are really dumb. I wouldn't trade you Victorino for Arroyo and Freel.
Posted by: ppratt1225 | June 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM
I can't see the Jays trading for an OF given the recent promotion of Lind, and the commitment from Gaston to playing him.
Cardenas or Carrasco would be enough to land Burnett 1-1. Worth the gamble for both sides?
Posted by: DH | June 24, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Jays don't need Victorino who isn't that good and has little value if not playing CF. They have a full OF.
But I'd love Cardenas or Carrasco for Burnett.
Posted by: Guitar Hero | June 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM
Just reading those comments on that website it sent you to were all freakin stupid. The Phillies fans think they are goin to give up basically nothing for Oswalt. Why would the Astros need Victorino when they have Lee long term, Bourn(who they aren't giving up on yet) and Pence who is here to stay. That article also doesn't point out that Oswalt has a no-trade clause, which he said he would wave to help the Astros out, but it would only be to a few teams and one was not the Phillies. And I agree with Kemo that it would take a whole farm system to get a guy that has a few years on his contract and his value is the lowest it has ever been (even though he is starting to come around) and is signed cheap
Posted by: H-Town-Baller | June 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I'd do Burnett and Downs for Cardenas, Jaramillo and a low prospect. Cardenas is still two years out IMO and his position is still a bit up in the air. Very promising bat though
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 24, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Arroyo for Victorino would be a good deal for both teams.
Bronson NEEDS a Manager who knows how to use him properly.
In 2007, Jerry Narron routinely allowed Arroyo to throw over 100 Pitches, even in short outings. In one Start, Narron allowed Arroyo to throw something like 127 Pitches in 5 2/3 Innings with 47 of those Pitches being in the last 2/3's of an Inning. THis caused Arroyo to have a "dead arm" for a period of time.
When Pete McKanin took over as the Red's Manager, he limited Arroyo's Pitch count and took him out of Games at the first hint of him struggling. When this happened, Arroyo's stats were MUCH better during the second half of the season.
Also, it didn't help Arroyo in 2007 that the Reds Offense failed to score many Runs for him. In nine of Arroyo's Starts, which the Reds lost, Arroyo and the Relievers held the opposing team to four or fewer Runs and the Reds lost by two Runs or less. In six of those Games, the Reds lost by scores of 2 to 0.
This year, Dusty Baker is allowing Arroyo to have high Pitch counts and has also used him on short rest. Thus he looks like he is, again, getting a "tired arm".
So I think, if used PROPERLY, Arroyo could be a good Pitcher even for a team that plays in a hitter friendly ball park.
Posted by: ctownboy | June 24, 2008 at 01:00 PM
I don't think Arroyo is anything special at all.
It's just the state of the current market, with the scarcity of any quality pitching, where you'd probably have to start with Victorino, a cheap, controllable player with plus defense and arm in right or center, 40+ SB potential and improving OPB, to even be in the conversation to acquire Bronson. With the amount of potentially interested teams, they'd probably have to end up giving more.
That's why the Reds would be really dumb NOT to deal him right now.
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 24, 2008 at 01:05 PM
I like the argument that a 31-year-old pitcher suffering from a dead arm in two consecutive seasons is a good thing.
Posted by: ae | June 24, 2008 at 01:37 PM
ae,
If you are aiming that at me, I didn't say it was a good thing. I was saying it was explainable and preventable/correctable.
Arroyo having a "dead arm" because the Manager DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO USE HIM is MUCH different than say, Bedard, having poor performances and limiting his own Pitch count because of injuries or fear of injuries.
People are willing to give up a boatload of talent for Bedard, who has YET to Pitch 200 Innings in a Major League season but do NOT want to give up very much for Arroyo, a guy who HAS Pitched over 200 Innings in each of the last three seasons.
So, yeah, go ahead and take your chances on Bedard and HOPE he can last for 3/4's of a season (and give up a LOT to get him) instead of giving up comparatively little for Arroyo, a guy who, if used PROPERLY, can last an entire season and put up good numbers to boot.
Posted by: ctownboy | June 24, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Adrian Cardenas, 2b another no fit for the Jays, unless he has the power to maybe move to 3rd in the future.
The Jays have Hill, Inglett, and Campbell <--who is tearing the cover off the ball in AA.
Posted by: Dev0 | June 24, 2008 at 04:48 PM
If Burnett is going my best guess is it is for a almost mlb ready pitcher or a solid SS prospect.
Posted by: Dev0 | June 24, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Dev0
So that means Carrasco or AJ Happ o Jason Donald? I hate to give up Carrasco but I am afraid to have three lefties in the rotation - I want a righty. I would actually prefer Oswalt (DUH! - I just realize how stupid I sounded saying that). Maybe not the whole farm - but I would trade 4 top prospects for him(Savery, Carrasco, Golson, Michael Durant or Michael Taylor) or 2 top prospects plus Ryan Madson and a Fabio Castro. BUT AFTER A PHYSICAL (NO MORE FREDDY GARCIA DAMAGED GOODS TRADES)
I'd be happy to hold onto Cardenas frankly. Im afraid to give this guy away. Many Scouts and other onlookers have said like Chase Utley as a hitter - and a very good athlete. Not your typical 2Ber (Hill, Inglett, Campbell).
Posted by: steveh | June 24, 2008 at 05:29 PM
by the way - Victorino for Arroyo - no way. I'd ask Arlen Spector to investigate.
Perhaps So Taguchi for Bronson Arroyo? ok, ok maybe a Brad HArman or Jason Donald. Thats an ugly contract Bronson has now...
Posted by: steveh | June 24, 2008 at 05:33 PM
I'd be reluctant to trade Cardenas as well, as ideally, he will be playing 2nd base when utley shifts to first when Howard is traded(and we all know its gonna happen)
Posted by: tmichalski | June 24, 2008 at 11:03 PM
This being Gillick's last season, I'm afraid he will unload the little bit left in the Phillies farm system. Carrasco and Lou Marson should be untouchables. Hell, I'd even say bring Carrasco up after the break. Neither is worth a rental or pitcher with a huge contract. If Vic goes, that would spell a lot of faith in Golson's progress.
Posted by: Groty | June 25, 2008 at 07:58 AM
Wow, nice start last night from Bronson...that's why I'm not a GM I guess
Groty I agree with you. Carrasco and Marson have to be considered the most irreplaceable prospects.
I still think a mix of guys like Cardenas, Bastardo, Golson, Outman could get the Phils in the discussion on Sabatia, Bedard, Burnett etc. I'd definitely be in favor of adding one of the two top lefties without giving up those two prospects or anything of consequence on the ML club
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 25, 2008 at 08:38 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again; if the Phils are hesitant to get in on the CC sweepstakes and ARE looking at more of a mid-level guy who won't absolutely break the bank, I really think the Orioles are a great fit. The idea: Jeremy Guthrie and, say, Jamie Walker for Adrian Cardenas, Kyle Drabek, Heitor Correa and, like, Chance Chapman.
Interesting little experiment...compare Guthrie's numbers last year and this year with those of almost any pitcher on the market save for CC. Hell, compare them with Bedard, since he was an Oriole himself before this year. I'm talking Blanton, Burnett, Arroyo, etc.
You back? OK, as you noticed, Guthrie was as good or better in almost EVERY pitching category that matters. And it's not like it's a fluke or something. Dude was a first round pick and when you watch him on the mound, it's clear why...he can deal. Furthermore, while he was lost in the Cleveland org. and got a late start on his MLB career, his numbers over the last two years account for his whole MLB career while given extensive starts.
Now remember that the late start means that Guthrie, who is still relatively young, is under team control, on the cheap, for several more years. He's not even available for ARBITRATION for another two years or something. Basically, Philly gets a pitcher comparable with any of the other Number 2 types out there (NOT CC, a clear #1), without any real red flags, who they can keep for next to nothing for several more years (I don't believe he's a free agent until 2013 as it stands now)...AND the solid lefty reliever they've been looking for and the O's get their replacement for Roberts (in a year or two), a high upside/big risk arm coming off TJ surgery known for being immature and kind of a tool, and a couple low minors prospects.
Now that I think about it, we're getting the short end here, so I might need to rethink the return and ask for a better pitching prospect than Drabek or even swap Cabrera in for Guthrie (think DCab and George Sherrill- can set up Lidge or take over closer duty if/when he blows up or leaves town after season- for Cardenas, Drabek, Correa), but you get the idea. The O's have to be sellers and continue the rebuild begun last winter and they have the young, veteran starting pitching in Guthrie or Cabrera and the relievers in either Walker or Sherrill, to match well with the Phils. Would love to hear what others think; particularly Philly fans (just don't be d-bags about it).
Posted by: milehigh78 | June 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM