MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Josh Hamilton Switches Agents | Main | Heyman's Latest: Griffey, Garcia, Sabathia »

Yankees-Sabathia Chatter

Tyler Kepner of the New York Times believes Victor Martinez's injury "will probably lead to a trade of the ace left-hander C.C. Sabathia."  He says the Yankees will have "strong interest" if Sabathia becomes available.  Kepner also expects the Cubs and Red Sox to be in the mix.

As for a return, Kepner suggests the Yankees could match the Indians' needs of pitching and infield help.  He does not see Robinson Cano as a possibility, though.

According to Baseball America, the Yankees have three Top 100 prospects aside from Joba Chamberlain: Jose Tabata (#37), Austin Jackson (#41), and Ian Kennedy (#45).  Others on the fringe of the Top 100 when BA compiled the rankings in March: Alan Horne, Jeff Marquez, and Jesus Montero.  Some of these players have seen their stock drop, however.  What do you think it'd take to get a deal done?


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553518ef78833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees-Sabathia Chatter:

Comments


"Contrary to what dark says, Vitters has value, however it IS diminished"

Huh? You say the same thing I say and say its contrary to me? Okay…

Anyway, what I am saying is what you are saying and including the part that his value is diminished even more to the Indians. What all these fantasy proposal threads/posts have in common is that they dont even begin to think of what the other team would want. Cleveland doesn’t draft HSers with high picks, so don’t you thinks its probably unlikely they turn around and assign a bunch of trade-value to a guy who can still only be considered that? Cleveland wants to build for their window (which currently sits between now and about 2010) ~ Vitters is 18 and has yet to really even begin a pro career. The Indians desire a ML-Ready 3B, we went over the "ML-Ready" part, but Vitters also is looking unlikely to stay at 3rd. If he doesn’t stay at third, and ends up a 1B/DH type then he is blocked by countless guys who are under control for years. Oh, and then there is the thing about him being hurt...

I mean, come on ~ I'm blown away that people can seriously sit there and act like Vitters would have a ton of value to the Tribe, and would be one of the centerpieces of a deal...

Oh, and the only reason anyone (which was actually ForLife) said Vitters has no value is because he’s on the DL. You cant trade a guy who is on the DL, making his value non-existent.

Oh, and the other thing that no one is taking into account is the fact that CC doesn’t want to leave Cleveland. He may, but he doesn’t want to. Cleveland has the cash to sign him, and knows that he doesn’t want to leave ~ the only thing holding up a deal to this point has been the length of the contract. The Indians options, as explained by the GM, are to take a package that would have to blow them away or wait and either resign him or take the DPs. This “this seems to be good enough” crap just wont fly ~ esp when most of the guys people here are trying to proclaim make no sense for the Indians to target…

Another option from Phillies....Victorino has nothing more than 10 HR power, but plays plus defense in right with a plus arm and 50 SB speed. Maybe a Victorino/Cardenas package plus a mid level part could appeal to CLE, since Golston is close in center and Werth is showing signs of being an everyday-caliber CF this year

Did anybody say that Vitters would be a centerpiece to a CC deal? I didn't, I know that. And Dark, be realistic, Vitters is working out and hitting right now. He could come off the DL at any time and be completely tradable, which means the whole "he is hurt and on the DL so he has no trade value" doesn't really pan out.

To me, Cleveland wants a SP that can immediately fit into the rotation (Gallagher)

a good 2nd base prospect that can play next year at the latest (Cedeno or Patterson)

and a couple of good prospects that could help in 2 years (Ceda, Veal, Colvin).

Seems like that trade could help them and address what they are looking for...

I hate typekey.

Wow, is this matchu guy trying to leapfrog Guru for the biggest dumba$$ in the universe or something? You call out Sabathia (who has no injury history) for being to fat and and an obvious future injury, then you advocate trading the same guys away for Rich Harden and Huston Street aka, Mr Softy and Mr Potato Head. mphm.

V, Carlos Gomez is more of a corner outfielder then a centerfielder? This is based on what logic? Gomez is a sick CF, he has range for days and a cannon for an arm. His growing pains and low OBP really stem from nothing accept the fact that he is 22 years old and making his ML debut.

By the way, V, yeah, the Mets tried to buy a WS this year, and where did it get them, you are right. But what about the Yankees. They are sitting in 4th place in their division, also sitting right around .500, so who the ef are you to criticize anybody else? The Yankees have been doing it for years, with no success, and they didnt do it this year, and they still are in absolutely no better shape then the Mets. Infact, the Yankees are in much, much worse shape then the Mets seeing as how the NL East cannot even compare to the AL East, and the Mets are chasing teams in Florida (who will be extremely lucky to win 80 games this year), and Philly (who is torrid right now but will cool down because they only have 1 reliable pitcher). Good luck chasing the Bosox and Rays all year.

Gomez IS a sick center fielder. Probably best in the majors(at least defensive value wise).

"By the way, V, yeah, the Mets tried to buy a WS this year, and where did it get them, you are right. But what about the Yankees. They are sitting in 4th place in their division, also sitting right around .500, so who the ef are you to criticize anybody else? The Yankees have been doing it for years, with no success, and they didnt do it this year, and they still are in absolutely no better shape then the Mets. Infact, the Yankees are in much, much worse shape then the Mets seeing as how the NL East cannot even compare to the AL East, and the Mets are chasing teams in Florida (who will be extremely lucky to win 80 games this year), and Philly (who is torrid right now but will cool down because they only have 1 reliable pitcher). Good luck chasing the Bosox and Rays all year."

Um, d00d? I wasn't criticizing. I was pointing out that betting the farm for a chance at the World Series is stupid. Smart front offices don't do it.

The Yankees (and Red Sox) have top 5-10 farm systems now. You don't wreck that by overpaying for rentals.

Lay off the spaz.

"Gomez IS a sick center fielder. Probably best in the majors(at least defensive value wise)."

Ninth best by Zone Rating:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&orderBy=zone_rating&direction=DESC&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B%5D=2008&league_filter%5B%5D=All&pos_filter%5B%5D=8&Submit=Submit

He's fast, but he's going to slow down when he builds up muscle (which he better do if he's going to be a power hitter).

V, that was one of the laziest posts I have ever seen. You post your little "analysis" of the MEts prospects that went to Minnesota to try to prove what the Yankees should pay, and in doing this you absolutely incorrectly analyze Gomez, and you dont even say anythin about the other 3 besides "Kennedy is better".

Kennedy is garbage, everybody tried to tell everybody else this last year, he is a fringe back of the rotation starter who does have some upside. So is Humber, only with much more upside the Kennedy. Mulvey is a safe back of the rotation guy with no much of a ceiling, but he could be a decent starter. Or not. Guerra is the x factor of the entire group, which you dont seem to understand at all. He is 18 or 19 years old, throws in the mid- upper 90's and throws a changeup that scouts love. I have heard comparisons to King Felix. So do us all a favor and stop pretending you are Keith Law and jus continue on being the homer that we know you are.

"Hughes OR Cano would likely have to be included. From there, I'd guess AJax or Tabata (Tabata's the better fit, but he's struggled mightily this year), Horne, and either Angelini or Montero."

If you seriously think the Indians are going to get anything REMOTELY CLOSE to that package, you gotta be kidding me.

Seriously.

There isn't a -single player- in the majors worth that package.

I dont care about his zone rating, if you watched him ever play CF, you would never ever say he is a corner OF. Maybe he is learning to play CF at the ML level still, but he can run down balls with anybody and obviously has everytool you want out of your CF. I bet you think Melky is a defensive stud though. And yeah, Gomez might put on some bulk when he gets around 25 or so, but he doesnt need the bulk to hit for power. He has a power capable body right now, it just that his game hasnt elevated to that level yet. Gomez only hit a couple of HR's for the Mets last year, but they were monster shots, not the wall scraping kind, and this tells me he has the power right now, its just a matter of making good enough contact consistently enough to hit balls out. Matt Kemp only has a handful of HR's but he has plenty of power. Not comparing the power games of those 2, just saying they both have untapped skills they they havent used yet. And finally, so what if Gomez doesnt hit for power. Great defense with a huge arm and a 280-290ish average with 60+ stolen bases every year isn't acceptable from your CF?

http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B0%5D=2008&league_filter%5B0%5D=All&pos_filter%5B0%5D=8&Submit=Submit&orderBy=fPct&direction=DESC&page=1

Even better.

Yes, he can fly. But he isn't an amazing fielder. Sure, he could develop into one, but if he puts on some bulk (and he -better- if he's going to be more Grady Sizemore than Juan Pierre), he's going to slow down.

"And finally, so what if Gomez doesnt hit for power. Great defense with a huge arm and a 280-290ish average with 60+ stolen bases every year isn't acceptable from your CF?"

Sure, if you think Juan Pierre, Jr. is worth Santana.

Carlos Gomez is growing into the next Carlos Beltran with more speed rather than Juan Pierre. So yes

How come A-Rod doesnt need to bulk up to hit Homers? Hanley Ramirez, Grady Sizemore, Alfonso Soriano? the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on, sahould I go on? Gomez will develop power if his game improves enough to let him. It has much less to do with his body then you think. Hitting Homeruns is not about being "bulky". Gomez already has power, he just isnt that good of a hitter yet. If you watch Gomez take batting practice, he can crush balls out of the yard. This tells me, and it should tell you, that his power is not contingent on him bulking up, it is dependant on whether he improves as a baseball player. If he bulks up and improves as a player, the power could be huge. If Gomez progresses through the next 3 years, there is no reason that he cant be a 20-25 homerun guy at 25 years old, even if he doesnt gain another pound.

note: I don't think Gomez will hit 35-40 home runs but their tools are similar and Gomez will have the higher average.

And V, you are the clown who is calling Gomez a corner outfielder. This is one of the things that would bring him closer to Pierre. If Pierre could play defense like Gomez in CF, I think a lot more teams would like him and his contract would not be a bad one at all.

“Did anybody say that Vitters would be a centerpiece to a CC deal? I didn't, I know that. And Dark, be realistic, Vitters is working out and hitting right now. He could come off the DL at any time and be completely tradable, which means the whole "he is hurt and on the DL so he has no trade value" doesn't really pan out.”

First ~ apparently you struggle with the word “IS”. You also apparently struggle with the fact that your beef with that being the case actually doesn’t lie with me. I mean, all day yesterday you argued that to me when I was even the one to say it ~ but whatever…
Second ~ when someone puts him first in the listing of names included in the package it makes it look like it kinda centers around him. Or when people (like yourself) proclaim him to be some amazing prospect who was taken 3rd in the draft or whatever, then one can only assume they are talking like he would have to be a centerpiece. But whatever…
Third ~ who knows why you are even arguing anyway, I don’t think you never even mentioned Vitters in a proposal, did you? But whatever…

“To me, Cleveland wants a SP that can immediately fit into the rotation”
…You missed the “top-of-rotation-type” that should be included with that SP. Gallagher doesn’t fit that in almost everyones eyes, but he’s a solid enough guy to include if the rest of the package is strong enough. There in lies the problem though, doesn’t it?

“a good 2nd base prospect that can play next year at the latest”
…Wanted to point out that you said “good 2B prospect” and mistakenly mentioned Patterson and Cedeno. Besides, they don’t want a 2B prospect ~ that’s what Cabrera, Barfield and Josh Rodriguez are. They want plus hitting 3B prospects that are close to majors (or maybe SS with Peralta moving over). Would they take a stud 2B prospect? Yeah, they can move guys around ~ but that isnt being offered…

IF the Cubs were to make a package, they would have to give a whole lot of quantity to overcome the lack of quality, and include what quality they have. I just cant see it happening ~ esp with a club that was doing everything they could to lowball on the last player they really wanted to add to their club…

darkstar do you really believe the Indians have even a decent shot to re-sign Sabathia if he hits the open market?

If he really wanted to stay there, as you speculate, and the Indians really are serious about re-signing him, then why aren't they close to a deal a la Zambrano?

If the Indians had any real intention of signing him they would be making a huge push right now, while they still are the only bidder. It can only cost them several millions to let him hit the open market, and if they are willing to match open market offers from CHI or NYY, then again, why haven't we heard that they are trying to float extensions at a 10-15% discount to theoretical 140 mio deals?

Unless you think CC is going to field offers and then leave a bunch of money on the table to come back, OR CLE is going to pull out the checkbook and wrestle with Steinbrenner. Neither is likely IMO

"esp with a club that was doing everything they could to lowball on the last player they really wanted to add to their club…"

Low ball? Really? The rumored deal that the Cubs were offering is something that nearly every cub fan is THRILLED they didn't end up giving up. There was no lowballing going on...Hendry just made a smart decision when McFail wouldn't take fair value. To say the Cubs lowballed for Roberts is completely ignorant of what really happened...

Wayne, you talk as if you are an inside source in the Indian clubhouse. How do youknow that resigning Sabathia is exactly what the Indians are trying to do right now? Becuase Mark Shapiro didn't email and phone you to mak sure you were in the loop?

I just figure with a player of his magnitude, if he and the Indians were both committed to working something out and were having discussions towards a deal, we'd be hearing reports of such, like we did with Carlos Zambrano.

Plus in darkstar's above post he left re-signing Sabathia after the season open as a legitimate option, citing that "he doesn't want to leave." Well, I don't see that as a really plausible option. I may be wrong. But if not, it would have to be a big factor into a decision to trade him (along with obviously the potential comp picks).

“darkstar do you really believe the Indians have even a decent shot to re-sign Sabathia if he hits the open market?
If he really wanted to stay there, as you speculate, and the Indians really are serious about re-signing him, then why aren't they close to a deal a la Zambrano?”

…Because unlike the Cubs, the Indians actually realize that players regress over time and don’t generally offer contracts exceeding 4 years.

Anyway ~ Yes, have you ever heard the man speak? I cant tell you the last time I have seen him talk where he hasn’t said he doesn’t want to leave and how tough it would be for him to do so. He goes on and on about how this is his organization, this is his second home, this is where he wants to be, etc… Do they have a chance? If they offered the amount of years he wants it would be done already…

Also, people say stuff like “open market offers from CHI or NYY” as if CC is only about the money and will sign as if he is a hired gun. CC donates more time and money than most in the game, CC is all about helping others (mainly because of the lack of blacks in the game) and is one of the more sentimental guys I have seen for a while. CC has told the public, as well as all his family (I’ve talked to family members a couple times) that he doesn’t want to leave and only really wants to play in the Bay-Area (or possibly SoCal teams) if he does. Could he sign elseware? Of course, no one knows what the future hold ~ but when everything is thought of as a whole it just doesn’t seem that great of odds for him to go elseware.

What I meant to say is, since we aren't hearing that he's close to an in-season extension, and I don't see an after season, open market extension for CLE as plausible, that sort of narrows the options for Shapiro: trade or two comp picks. With several potentially interested teams, I think that tips the scales towards trade

Oh and:
“Low ball? Really? The rumored deal that the Cubs were offering is something that nearly every cub fan is THRILLED they didn't end up giving up”

…a fan base which is notorious for overvaluing the teams prospects, and was on here daily saying they didn’t want to give up anything that held any value (everything was “that seems like a fair offer” for a guy that was said to take a “blow-me away” offer ~ much like here) was “THRILLED” they didn’t pull it off? Really? Why does that not come as a surprise…

Anyway, yes ~ they tried to lowball on the offer ~ shoot, half the “untouchables” are the guys every Cubs fan is offering up for each and every available player at this time. Every thread of “so&so might be available” has atleast one or two Cubs fans giving a package that includes one of them…

darkstar I hear you about his attitude. he's said all the right things. However, what CC says publicly can't really be taken completely at face value UNLESS you think he's willing to leave a lot of money on the table to come back to CLE. If he is, then luck you as an Indians fan.

But if your ideas are all true and player and organization could come to common ground, I'd have to figure it would happen during this season, to take away the potential for an explosive FA offer for the clear cut top pitcher available.

I infer from your post that you don't think CLE would be willing to give the top offer in both years and money on Sabathia. To that I ask, who is the last young star baseball player, yet to cash their first mega contract paycheck, to leave both years and money on the table in FA?

We know that the offer consisted of Gallagher, Cedeno, and at least one other player. That alone shows that it wasn't a "lowball" offer. To say the Cubs lowballed them is just plain unfactual and wrong, otherwise known as "ignorant of truth"...

Is there anyone else out there that just ignores what darkstar says. I dont even read his posts. When he is in the room make sure you dont have you own opinion cuz it will be completely wrong.

EDIT: for my above question about young player deals, I meant last young player without a big second contract to hit FA to take a discount in years and money to stay.

“darkstar I hear you about his attitude. he's said all the right things. However, what CC says publicly can't really be taken completely at face value UNLESS you think he's willing to leave a lot of money on the table to come back to CLE. If he is, then luck you as an Indians fan.”

…See, and I would agree 100% if it was a casual mention as though it’s a PR move ~ his saying it every single time he opens his mouth though…


“But if your ideas are all true and player and organization could come to common ground, I'd have to figure it would happen during this season, to take away the potential for an explosive FA offer for the clear cut top pitcher available.”

…Neither side wants to negotiate during the season ~ and we have no clue if they have done so. Besides, and “explosive FA offer” doesn’t always land its man, and its unknown if anyone will even do such a thing anyway. The Cubs wont, the ChiSox and Mets cant afford it, the Yanks didn’t want to go the years to Santana and the BoSox don’t make sense as a destination for that kind of cash. The Dodgers might, but they have bad contracts already and might be fearful of landing another. SF cant, Oakland wont, ANA makes little sense… Think about it, the offers might not be what people expect. All f it coupled together = a question mark…


“We know that the offer consisted of Gallagher, Cedeno, and at least one other player. That alone shows that it wasn't a "lowball" offer. To say the Cubs lowballed them is just plain unfactual and wrong, otherwise known as "ignorant of truth"...”

…Baltimore says “Pie (or Hill) + Gallagher + Pitching Prospect” and Chicago responds with “Gallagher + Cedeno + other” and its not lowballing? Such a proclamation seems "ignorant of truth"...

Its not about what Baltimore says...and you don't even know what they said anyway. You are speculating, and furthermore, it doesn't matter. The offer of Gallagher, Cedeno, and even if the third player was Marshall or Murton...doesn't matter. That is in no way, shape or form, a "lowball" offer. Gallagher would look real good in that rotation for years to come, would he not? How are their SSs doing?

This is not hard man. You say the Cubs "lowballed" them.

The Cubs offered a very competitive deal which many Baltimore fans, looking back, probably wish they would have taken.

There was no "lowballing" going on.

To say there was is simply ignorant of truth. Period.

Adun, again ~ WTF do you want? Troll all you like, it doesnt mean a damn thing... The Cubs tried to lowball the O's; now I suguest you attempt to get over it...

I want you to acknowledge that you made a dumb statement, and got called out for it. They did not lowball them, its fact. Otherwise known as truth.

But again, I guess complete ignorance of truth rules in your world...

"Hughes OR Cano would likely have to be included. From there, I'd guess AJax or Tabata (Tabata's the better fit, but he's struggled mightily this year), Horne, and either Angelini or Montero. If that sounds like a lot...it is"

The Yankees wouldn't even be considering Sabathia if Cleveland asked for this. As V said, there isn't a single player in the league the Yanks would make this trade for. Teams just don't trade prospects like they used to.

"“Well, considering that Cleveland's outfield, other than Sizemore, consists of Franklin Gutierrez, David Dellucci, Ben Francisco and Shin-Soo Choo, I think Melky will fit into a starting spot nicely, especially since he's younger than any of them.”

You just mentioned 3 CFers, all three of which have provided better results at the plate as well. Melky might be young, and you might even think he is slightly better than that group ~ but even if that were true, what would be the point of assigning trade value to him? It would roughly equate to the Yankees trading anything of value for Sexson and releasing Giambi ~ no noticeable positional improvement (to probable regression in production), loss of prospects (by exclusion of others in the CC scenario) and the loss of a guy who has so far proven himself to be better (one of those 4 would need to be released if Melky was added)…

…Like I said earlier ~ silly…"

I don't think it's silly at all. You are improving your team by adding a better, younger player. Melky has a higher average than all of those guys except Francisco (although in more at-bats) and more homers than any one of those guys but Dellucci (they both have 7) AND he's younger AND he's a better defensive player than any of them... please tell me how he doesn't help you? Do you really think Dellucci will be around next year? Can't you spin one of those other guys into some bullpen help or another prospect? Melky isn't a premier outfielder... I realize that, but he's established himself as a solid ML starter... Dellucci is and always has been a role player and none of those other guys are guaranteed ML players.

"Is there anyone else out there that just ignores what darkstar says. I dont even read his posts. When he is in the room make sure you dont have you own opinion cuz it will be completely wrong"

I dont ignore Dark's posts, but I ignore yours on a lot of occasions. They are always the same, Cubs homer, Pie/ Murton for Pujols and Wainwright and Duncan and A-rod and Halladay posts that they always are. Just type in uww1 and it will bvring you directly to the Cub homer trade thread database.

"http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B0%5D=2008&league_filter%5B0%5D=All&pos_filter%5B0%5D=8&Submit=Submit&orderBy=fPct&direction=DESC&page=1"

You seriously just gave me fielding percentage and then acted as if you just made your case? Remind me next time we debate something that you dont have enough intelligence for me to waste time trying to prove anything to you.

"I want you to acknowledge that you made a dumb statement, and got called out for it. They did not lowball them, its fact. Otherwise known as truth.
But again, I guess complete ignorance of truth rules in your world..."

...4 thousand reports saying that the O's want Pie + Gallagher and the Cubs offer Gallagher + out-of-options, crappy-@ss, Cedeno (.239 / .328 / .284 outside that one hot week in April) while stating every one else was “untouchable” leads to your new obsession where you somehow feel you just absolutely have to have me say they didn’t try to lowball because that’s what you want to believe? Huh? You really are off your rocker man… Seriously, seek help!

“please tell me how he doesn't help you?”

How does it make sense to trade for someone you cant obviously use and stands a strong possibility of landing in the minors? Cabrera doesn’t help because he would be one of 4 guys competing for 2 OF spots while seemingly having the least talent of the bunch. Also, Cabrera does not have the best D out of all of them, but that’s moot anyway since he would be playing LF not Center. Plus, please don’t give me 2008 stats like everyone else has played a ton of games, talent wise the others are above him while providing better results so far. Could this change? Maybe… But you don’t trade your Ace for a “well, maybe end eventually ends up to be as good as or a little better than what we got”…

Lastly, I wouldn’t be bragging about Melky’s HR totals when they came over 250 PA, can be counted on one hand and match the amount of doubles + triples he has managed. The overall .385 SLG is just flat out pitiful, you have to admit that…


Oh and:
“I dont ignore Dark's posts, but I ignore yours on a lot of occasions”

…Hahaha, I just ignored it, and would have never known it was there if not for you pointing it out…

For C.C. Sabathia I think the Cubs would give up
Murton
Patterson (Which could be a reason he's up to take Soriano spot.)
Hart and maybe someone else. Agree? Disagree?
P.S. Darkstar is the man

"For C.C. Sabathia I think the Cubs would give up
Murton
Patterson (Which could be a reason he's up to take Soriano spot.)
Hart and maybe someone else. Agree? Disagree?
P.S. Darkstar is the man"

I can't believe that post actually happened.

The Cubs simply didn't "lowball" them, and its fact. How long are you going to ignore that???

I dont hardly post that much and I stat my opinion or what I think. I like to read what people think. I dont know when these posts started to be just a rip on people and arguing with everyone.

Murton? Cedeno? Patterson? Man, the Tribe would be better off with draft picks.

“I dont hardly post that much and I stat my opinion or what I think. I like to read what people think. I dont know when these posts started to be just a rip on people and arguing with everyone.”

…Other than Aduns obsessive ‘SAY they DIDN’T try to LOWBALL them!!! SAY IT!!!!! YOURE IGNORANT!!!’ thing, the thread isnt that bad at all for a Yankee/Cubs one…

But anyway, to get to the bottom of the situation and what everyone thinks there of course has to be back and forth (or sometimes arguing, but there seems very little of that here outside of the aforementioned) to find the ground of which to work off of. A ton of random people throwing out random names which don’t logically fit into the equation or take everything into account as a whole of course wont go anywhere ~ evident by basically each and every thread that’s ever come before this one. People like myself are trying to help with that base (the other sides prospective otherwise has no voice) which should be considered when coming up with the proposals. If it gets to the point where players which don’t logically fit Cleveland’s roster are left off completely or treated almost exclusively like filler/throwins (ie, like Cedeno or Melky types in this instance) then you are looking at a situation where proposals will be more reasonable to what could actually get it done…

To reference the Roberts/Cubs threads ~ there was a time where certain posters were relentlessly guaranteeing that a package of Murton/Marshall/Cedeno would instantly get it done ~ long debates later and the proposals evolved into a more realistic situation.

"How does it make sense to trade for someone you cant obviously use and stands a strong possibility of landing in the minors? Cabrera doesn’t help because he would be one of 4 guys competing for 2 OF spots while seemingly having the least talent of the bunch. Also, Cabrera does not have the best D out of all of them, but that’s moot anyway since he would be playing LF not Center. Plus, please don’t give me 2008 stats like everyone else has played a ton of games, talent wise the others are above him while providing better results so far. Could this change? Maybe… But you don’t trade your Ace for a “well, maybe end eventually ends up to be as good as or a little better than what we got”…

Damnit... it cut off my whole post. Anyway, as I said in a lot more detail, Melky is:
1. Better defensively (at any of the OF positions)
2. Has as much potential/upside
3. Is at least 1.5 years younger
4. Is more established and has had more success at the ML level (and in NY particularly) and the postseason
..than anybody on your roster (other than Sizemore, again). He's 23, has a career .273 BA and has more than twice as many AB as anyone but Dellucci. He IS a ML starting OF. None of those guys are anything but POTENTIAL ML players, not one of which has all that high a ceiling. So I'm really not sure where you're coming from. Maybe one of those guys COULD become a better player than Melky, but try explaining to me how he isn't automatically your 2nd best OF?

Yeah, Type-Key is horrible and oftentimes cuts things off or plays its games to where you lose the post… Sadly, almost all of us seem to deal with it…


Anyway, we know you think that Melky is somehow a better player. That still doesn’t really matter though, and I think you may not understand the complete situation.

Think of it this way. Lets say you have Austin Jackson, Ben Francisco, Franklin Gutierrez, Shin-Soo Choo and David Dellucci and I had Melky Cabrera.

In that scenario, would you trade your Jackson and Gutierrez for my Cabrera?

I would trade one, plus another player, if I was confident Francisco or Choo could fill in the other position(s). I might even trade both under the right circumstances.

I understand what you're getting at, but look at it from this point of view: It appears now that 4 players are fighting for 2 spots (3 of which are fighting for them long-term). If you acquire Melky, you now have those same 3 fighting for 1 position, which means 2 things:
1. You have established/upgraded and removed a question at one position and now only need to figure out 1 position long term, and
2. You can now spin 1 or even 2 of those guys in a deal to fill other holes on your team in the offseason

If Cleveland is looking to win next year, this deal clearly helps. I think Choo, Francisco and Gutierrez will potentially give Cleveland at least 1 solid starter, but this deal would allow them to fill in 1 OF spot, keep 1 or 2 of those guys to compete for the third slot and trade 1 or 2 while their value is highest.

But that is not the case, it would not be 2 spots filled and 3 guys fighting for the other ~ it would be 5 guys fighting for 2 spots with one going to be DFAed at the end of it. (and trying to trade one is foolish, better to just take the better prospect than Melky to start and not have to make another deal) Anyway, Melky has in no way earned a guaranteed spot just by being young and playing in the majors to this point ~ and he may or may not win out the battle in the end. And lets just say he is somehow one of the 4 that is kept, he will be in a platoon with one of the others since he cant hit lefties. Right now, he is not playing better than any of the others though, so he would be #5 of the 5 and the most likely to get dumped. Not the type a team should be trading for…

Really, his Age is the only thing he has going for him, but its not even that much of a positive since his team-control is equal to shorter than the others. His lack of progress at the ML level and continually pitiful OBP and SLG (which both seem to be regressing yearly from his second year) are getting to the point where he is beginning to look like he is even a poor choice as a CF option for a bad team, let alone a corner guy for a contender. It seems that Yankee fans are the only people out there that think highly of Melky, everyone else sees a guy who hasn’t even been able to get close to LgAvg production at the plate in 4 years worth of trying ~ not someone you want on a corner spot… All of this is compounded greatly by the fact that the team needs power, the thing Melky is showing to be the worst at. His HR/AB rate is by far the worst of all the players we are talking about, his continual .390 (or lower) SLG is beyond pitiful from a corner spot ~ he just doesn’t fit…

And all of that is coupled with the fact that Cleveland doesn’t get a prospect they can really use in Melky’s place. It makes no sense, ‘guy you can really use’ or ‘guy that may or may not be on his way out the door as soon as you get him’ ~ choice makes itself…

Now, I understand that people in NY really want to get rid of him (despite somehow also claiming he is so good) ~ we saw that in the Santana proposals. But just like Minn in the Santana talks, Cleveland is not going to look at Melky and see real value. The Twins even had an actual need for a CFer and didn’t really want him; Cleveland has no use for him at all and certainly wouldn’t take him in place of another prospect they could actually use… If Cleveland felt that they really needed to get a better corner-OF type, they can sign one off the FA market ~ a 90-ish OPS+ guy who may or may-not be better than what you got which comes at the expense of another top-prospect is just not worth taking in return for an Ace…

I think you are valuing your own prospects WAY too much to say that Melky would be "#5 of the 5". What has any one of them ever done at the ML level? Nothing. Melky was brought up as a defensive CF, but posted a .280/.360/.391 line in his rookie year at the age of 21. Last year he posted similar numbers and this year he has struggled early, but he's going to grow and hit .280-.300 with increased power and top-flight defense. Yankee fans don't want to get rid of him, trust me. In looking at your prospects, I don't see any one of them that would be considered a top-flight prospect. What's going to happen with your current system is that you will get 600 ABs for each, maybe come out with 1 guy that is capable of playing full-time (or maybe not) and end up with 2 guys with no trade value. At least now they have some value. You aren't getting another Sizemore with Melky, but you at least know what you are getting - a quality ML starter who is still growing. If you are looking to win next year, Melky is DEFINITELY your guy over anyone you have.

Personally, I love Melky and don't want to give him up, but I realize that he does have value and would be willing to part with him for a guy like Sabathia... as long as it isn't a rental.

Demanding Joba and Cano is not absurd, what is absurd is hearing all these names that won't amount to anything like Melky Cabrera, hell, he's a 4th outfielder on any team just about.

Cleveland isn't going to take junk just like Minnesota didn't take junk and that is why you are not getting CC. It's not absurd to ask for the best when you're getting a guy who is 28, the reigning CY Young and if he had any run support this year would be about 10-2.

So Yankee fans need to worry about overpaying guys like Jaret Wright and Carl Pavano and stop trying to pawn your crap off on every other team in baseball. It doesn't work anymore.

And any team that would acquire CC would be doing so contingent on an extension...so it wouldn't be a 4 month rental.

Ok, I really don’t even know how you can begin to argue this. Melky is a rather poor-hitting CFer who would be a flat out miserable corner guy ~ it doesn’t really even have anything to do with the other players Cleveland has; even if they weren’t there Cabrera still wouldn’t make sense in Cleveland. But they are there as well, and they are out of options, and they are playing better ~ so it makes it even worse of a fit! I mean, why do you take a guy who doesn’t make sense anyway and lose other guys who are playing better on top of it while simultaneously passing up a better prospect who could have been had in Melky’s place? I’ll tell ya ~ you don’t!

Really, take a look at the CF OPS rankings the last couple years:
2008 CFers with lower OPS (4) ~ Milledge, Jones, Bourn and Taveras
2007 CFers with lower OPS (3) ~ Crisp, Wells and Corey Patterson
2006 CFers with lower OPS (3) ~ Kotsay, Podsednik and Taveras

…Yet you think he should be a corner type on a contending team? Come on, its beyond illogical ~ it makes no sense what so ever… Its not going to happen, Melky will not be traded to the Indians. I might as well put money on it, it’s the most illogical thing they could ever do… They would be better off taking Farnsworth then Melky, atleast Kyle could be used… Matsui and his contract makes more sense. Shoot, Damon makes more sense ~ Cabrera just makes absolutely no sense at all no matter how you flip it… Melky = not going to Indians, end of story…


“Cleveland isn't going to take junk just like Minnesota didn't take junk and that is why you are not getting CC”

…No kidding. I mean, a team without a CFer at all was saying it would have taken Hughes + Kennedy + Cabrera ~ how low does that put Melky’s value? Did he create negative value, and the extremely high-valued Kennedy had to be added to counteract it? If NY really does want to get rid of Melky, they will probably find themselves in the same situation that Boston was in with Crisp; thinking he holds value and having no one offering anything for him…

good idea, let's trade cano and hughes when their values are at all-time lows. this site is a great source of information.

and you can say that the trade Won't be a rental all you want. but what do you know? If CC doesn't agree to a contract, it is a rental. or it is no deal and he becomes a fa at the end of the year

Once again, it wouldn't be a rental because the team dealing for him WOULD demand a contract extension in order to complete a deal.

But yea, Yankee fans and Yankee writers assume it is their birthright to just pick and choose who they want on their team and the other team is forced to make it happen.

NEWSFLASH: You haven't won jack squat since 2000. Your reign is over and has been over for a while now. And aren't you looking up at Tampa? And aren't you barely around .500?

Keep your junk. Go away. Enjoy your bad contracts. And for the writer, to say the Indians are about out of contention but to compare them to the Yankees would mean the Yankees are out of contention too. How about looking to deal Matsui, Pettite, Mussina, etc to get yourself a farm system that matters.

At least you are admitting we had a reign, hater.

I would love to be a seller at the deadline with damon and abreu. but that might not sit well with most fans.

Neither the Yankees nor the Indians are out of it. but the indians are having injury problems which might weigh into a decision.

i worded it wierd, but i meant what you said. no one is giving up quality for a rental of CC. they'd (whichev team) want to sign him

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.