![]() |
|
|
| |
« Manny Would Approve Trade | Main | Odds and Ends: Happ, Igawa, Hawkins, Lowe »
10:05pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman seems to be saying the Mariners are still asking for Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner, though many think one of them would be plenty.
9:27pm: Talks seem to have stalled; Jerry Crasnick got the impression that GM Brian Cashman is not optimistic about a deal happening.
5:59pm: ESPN's Buster Olney says the Yankees are holding firm, offering a marginal prospect and salary relief.
1:25pm: The Jarrod Washburn talks seem to be plodding along; I am going to start a fresh thread here and update it throughout the day.
Ken Rosenthal says the Yankees made an offer of an average prospect and absorption of most of his contract. So far no agreement has been reached. Washburn started today and shut down the Jays in Toronto.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553bcf88d8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jarrod Washburn Rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
How would dumping salary help the Mariners? If we want to rebild we need to get decent players in return. We can't use the free agent market to get back to contention, that is how we got to be a 100 million dollar club and still the worst team in Mariner history. If the Yankees don't want Wash then don't trade for him, but don't criticize the Mariners for not making a trade that would make the team worse. And don't criticize us for not taking it in the ass like the media, the league, and a number of other teams do for the Yankees.
Posted by: ZBham | July 27, 2008 at 09:14 PM
Howie Kendrick looks good, but right now, he's not better... Brian Roberts causes as many outs as he does prevents... He does a lot of things good in the stat column, but he's one of the few guys who is actually too aggressive with his base stealing and trying to take extra bases... When we played Baltimore, the first thing I noticed was that he ran his team out of a lot of big innings... Those things are big and he's been deteriorating a lot, to the point that we NEVER hear him brought up in trade discussions... Polanco has been overhyped for years, and while he's a good 2B, he's not the All-Star that everyone acts like he is!
ZBham, good points, my thoughts exactly.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:16 PM
I have a fair trade for you all...
The Yankees get:
Jarrod Washburn
Kenji Johjima
The Mariners get:
Kei Igawa
Brett Gardner
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Teams don't just take on 14 million in salary and give away a top prospect for a year and two months of a league average pitcher, especially when they aren't exactly pressed for starting pitching. The Mariners can either pick up a portion of Washburn's salary and trade him to someone other than the Yanks (as they'd rather have the prospect than the money anyway) for a good prospect, or they can take a decent prospect and get rid of the salary. As for everyone saying the Mariners don't need to dump salary, I think everyone gets that they have the money to pay Washburn, but I think the point you are missing is that they could find far better uses for that money than Washburn. And no ZBham, they don't have to waste the money of free agents. They could just as easily take guys who drop in the draft because of asking price and pay them above slot money. They could also spend the excess money on international signings to bolster their farm system. Their are plenty of ways to spend the money, but I think we can all agree there are far better uses than Jarrod Washburn.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 09:20 PM
BASEBALLGURU thank you for your knowledge on the M's and the rest of the league no sarcasim intended. You bring up many interesting points and thoughts to ponder.
Posted by: hayeclan | July 27, 2008 at 09:22 PM
I love how BaseballGuru claims the guy with the .364 OBP causes too many outs, while the guy with the .320 OBP is one of the best 2B in the game. Even if you factor in the other outs that Roberts has made, he has still made fewer outs per plate appearance than Lopez.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 09:23 PM
If we need to eat some of Washburn salary to get anything for him, I'm all for it. Like I said before getting good players is more important than the money.
There are better uses for money for Washburn, but the Mariner's are not a poor team so they can still go after international players without giving up Washburn.
Posted by: ZBham | July 27, 2008 at 09:24 PM
Actually not that bad analysis on the 2B. I'd still say Roberts is better at this point in time (he's been CS 10 times but he's got 27 SB and beats Lopez in a lot of other categories) but otherwise agree.
As for the Yankees trade, would the Mariners really do that? The Yankees would be taking on even more salary, and I don't think the Mariners seem high on losing Joh. I know Clement is the future and all, but Joh got that huge contract and it's not like he couldn't move to DH/1B (or Clement could for that matter).
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 27, 2008 at 09:26 PM
nixa - agreed. Roberts is definitely better right now.
And also Guru, you still haven't adressed the power pitcher debate. 100 MPH and Ks aren't always the sign of a good pitcher. Low pitch counts and weak contact do just as well...that's kind of how Greg Maddux made his career. And that's more the kind of guy Wang is.
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 27, 2008 at 09:27 PM
Thanks Guru. I suppose if I wanted to make myself sound smart, I wouldn't have called myself Know ID yuh. Another thing I like about Mariner fans, how pretentious they are. It is clear you follow the game closely, so cheers to you. It is also clear that you are not very bright.
And keep hoping for a good return on Washburn. It is not like teams are looking to unload prospects for a pitcher making three times what his value is. Even if the Mariners don't have to unload salary, who in their right mind would want to unload prospects to pay Washburn a ton? If the Mariners get a prospect for Washburn, consider yourself lucky.
Posted by: Know ID yuh | July 27, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Guru why would you want Igawa he sucks.
Second you were just boasting about how Johjima is the next Pudge Rodriguez a great game caller and now you want to trade him.
"Sorry, but to think a catcher doesn't have influence on the game is ignorant on the surface and in the least shows no rationality, especially when talking about a 22 year old who relies heavily on his game calling"
I never said that. Felix relies more on his stuff than game calling.
Posted by: metsfan | July 27, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Pettitte in 2007 finished June with an ERA of 3.24 ended the season with an ERA of 4.05, that's futility at it's best. That's 11 starts with giving up 3 ER or more and 5 starts where he got shelled out of 18. A total of a a 4.84 ERA for the last three months.
In 2006 he had 10 QS out of 18 games, 16 of which were starts. That's far from #1 or #2 starts. I'll take a guy that gets hammered in three starts and pitches great the rest of the time over a guy that barely misses a one good, one bad, Jekyl and Hyde type performance.
To bring up 2005 which was 1.44 runs per 9 IP below his career average is questionable at best and shows true cherry picking of stats... I said recently, that was meant to be post HGH usage...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:31 PM
mets fan,
it's a matter of having TOO MANY catchers... we have Clement now and risk him losing value or not progressing if he isn't the starter, so it makes sense to clear salary if we are going to commit to Jeff.
Felix has great stuff, but watch his next start and see how he works the batters, it's not just his stuff, there are guys out there with insane "stuff" who still get hammered, i.e. AJ Burnett in 2008, Mike Mussina in 2007, Daniel Cabrera career.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:36 PM
In 15 years Maddux has never walked more than 45 batters and averages around 30 per season-ish. Not going to compute it, but mostly he's in the 30s with a few 20s to balance out the high years from 1994 to present. his strikout total pre-40 years old was never less than 136 except for 118 and 124, the rest of the years he had many more strikeouts and far less walks than Wang... There's a reason Wang is a feast or famine type pitcher, he doesn't know which version of himself is going out on any given day and that can be said of most of the Yankees starters, which is why I'm not big on them, anti-Yankee bias aside.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:40 PM
I'm not just talking SB with Roberts, he also tries to stretch a lot of 2B to 3B and 1B to 2B... Those don't show up in the stat column either... He probably makes 50 outs a year on stupid baserunning, I KNOW he made 5 or 6 just in the 4 games series we had in baltimore back in April.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:42 PM
Kenji Johjima as a 1B/DH. Haha, isn't he hitting .208 with three HRs? I guess the Mariners might consider it because Vidro at DH might almost be as bad. Maybe that is why Vidro has a job.
Keep going Mariner fans, I'm loving it.
Posted by: Know ID yuh | July 27, 2008 at 09:43 PM
KNOW ID YUH words is hard
Posted by: hayeclan | July 27, 2008 at 09:43 PM
ZBham,
You need to find someone other than the Yanks to deal with if you'd rather pick up some salary and get a better prospect though. I'm sure they'd rather pay the extra money and hold onto their guys. You also seem to be missing the point I'm trying to make about giving up Washburn. I'm not saying that they couldn't sign international guys with Washburn's salary still on the books. What I'm saying is that the Mariners have a budget for how much they can spend in a year and if they pay 14 million to Washburn, that's 14 million they can no longer use on draft picks, international free agents, and major league salaries. They can obviously spend a lot more in those areas if they move Washburn.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 09:44 PM
I didn't say he was in Maddux's class, just that he seems more that kind of pitcher to me. I'm more just trying to say that you don't have to K guys to be dominant. It certainly helps, but maddux's k stats were never close to guys like randy johnson and clemens and the like.
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 27, 2008 at 09:44 PM
"Felix has great stuff, but watch his next start and see how he works the batters, it's not just his stuff, there are guys out there with insane "stuff" who still get hammered, i.e. AJ Burnett in 2008, Mike Mussina in 2007, Daniel Cabrera career"
Mike Mussina in 2007 has insane stuff that is a joke. Mussina is entering the last few years of his career and his "stuff" isn't what it used to be.
Posted by: metsfan | July 27, 2008 at 09:45 PM
Not a Mariner fan Know ID, just looking at Joh's massive contract and his stats from last year and trying to make something out of nothing. Way to assume homer bias though.
And they do have stats for that stuff just not on your average sites. I'd still prefer Roberts at this stage in his career versus Lopez's.
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 27, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Dang, I forgot... Lopez also has twice the SF, strikes out a 1/3 as much, drives in 150% of the runs Roberts does, is only 24 and his power is developing, I wouldn't be surprised if he ends with 15 HR, probably will be more like 12, but 15 is well within his reach. He's getting better and I think he's already caught Roberts as far as production goes. As for the base stealing, Billy Beane syays that anything less than 80% success at stealing is a detriment to the teams success, hense Roberts with only 2 seasons of better than 80% and I believe the number is 86.7, but I'm going off memory from seeing it in an article once a few weeks ago...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:46 PM
BaseballGuru,
Seriously man, 50 outs a year trying to stretch it on the base paths? Do you even think before you speak? Taking last year as an example, Roberts reached base by hit or walk 275 times and scored 103 runs. That's only 172 times that he possibly could have been thrown out on the bases and you're actually claiming he gets thrown out on dumb baserunning about 30% of the time...think about that for a second.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 09:50 PM
The point is that with a "96 mph fastball and a good sinker" he should be making more bats miss that's alarming to me on the surface... Even if he's not a strikeout guy, if your stuff is that good, you'll get the outs, plus Maddux never was wild enough to get the good strikeout totals, if you are always around the plate the batters know it and they change their approach accordingly, look at David Wells, one of the best pitchers in terms of locating pitches and eliminating walks, he got hammered a lot because of how often he was in the strike zone, to his own admission, his best performances was when his command faltered. When you walk guys and stay out of the strike zone the way Wang does with his questionable command, you should have players in a more passive state, not feeling forced to swing, so you should get called 3rd strikes and guys chasing out of the zone, he doesn't, this means he's not the dominant pitcher everyone has him written down for and finally as far as Washburn vs. Wang, let's also not forget than Wang has had the benefit of starting against Seattle that Washburn hasn't... If Washburn had two starts against our craptastic offense, his ERA would be 4.00
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:52 PM
I think the typical season magic number for necessary SB rate is 72%.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 09:53 PM
Oh and I just went through the play-by-plays for the Baltimore Seattle four game set and Roberts got thrown out 3 times all series. The only reason you think its so much more is all 3 happened in 1 game. One was a caught stealing and 2 times he got thrown out at home. I'm actually willing to bet that this one game is the only reason you believe he makes 50 outs on the bases each season. That's just insane man.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 09:56 PM
That's great. looking at this year and last, jose has been knocking in a lot more and has a little more power. But Roberts sets the table and scores a lot more runs. Both pretty solid players, just different responsibilities.
But Roberts also walks (his OBP is almost 50 points higher this year) and gets more XBHs overall (he has a lot more doubles than Jose, and 7 more triples). Jose will get real good as he matures, but for now I'll take Roberts and his dumb base running.
And there's no way that of about 200 times on base a year, he runs himself into 50 outs. That's exaggerating. More like 25 tops (10 CS, 15 of your "blunders")
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 27, 2008 at 09:58 PM
Well what's 5 or 6 out 16 plate appearances 31.25% to 37.5%, so yeah, I guess he just brought his A game against us...
hayeclan, thanks for taking the time to say that... I try and stay impartial, it's to appear that when you know more about "your team", but I stay up on all things baseball, have been sick with baseball fever for 20 years and suck up stats left and right... It's one of the few things I truly get on cerebral level...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 09:58 PM
"He probably makes 50 outs a year on stupid baserunning, I KNOW he made 5 or 6 just in the 4 games series we had in baltimore back in April."
If you're referring to the April 4th-7th series, Roberts reached base 8 times in 4 games and scored 2 runs. He was caught stealing once, so you're saying he got nailed 4-5 more times trying to stretch a hit or take an extra base? Really?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Ah, Nixa. We were researching the same thing at the same time.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM
What I would do with the Mariners
C-Joh apears to be finished, so I would either try to dump him in a trade (Joh is a play unlike Wash who actually has no value), or maybe drop him outright. The future at C probably belongs to Clement or maybe Johnson if Clement flops.
1B-Mariners don't have any real 1B. Hopefully we can find one in a trade.
2B-Lopez is good enough to keep, but shouldnt be one of our core players.
SS- Yuni can hold the possition until Triunfel arrives.
3B- It would be great if we could trade Beltre to probably the Twins and eat some of his salary in exchange for some decent vaulue prospects. Beltre should be replaced either with someone from a trade or possibly Tuiasosopo.
OF- Trade Ibanez. Maybe trade Ichiro, but only if we get the world back for him. We would need to get a hell of a lot for Ichiro, because he is a big money maker for the Mariners. Assuming we keep Ichiro we should hope one OF from our sysetem turns out well probably Reed, Balentien,or Diaz. Fill the last spot with someone from a trade.
SP- Felix, Bedard, and Silva will probably be in the rotation for a few years. I would try to put Morrow in the rotation. The final spot should be some one from the minors saving a spot for Aumont.
RP-We can fill out the bullpen with pitchers from our system. Trade Rhodes.
Posted by: ZBham | July 27, 2008 at 10:05 PM
You should target a high ceiling OF like Adam Jones.
(Sorry. I actually feel bad for fans of teams with awful/hotseat GMs. If Cashman had buckled this offseason and traded Hughes, I may have barfed.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Of course BaseballGuru, who claims to truly get baseball on a cerebral level, doesn't take into account the extra bases that Roberts gets because of his aggressive baserunning and the extra runs this leads to with his teams. The question is whether the total sum of those decisions leads to more or less runs in the long run. Neither of us has the numbers to make a conclusion on that, but then again you're the only one trying to draw a conclusion.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM
It would be great if we could get a team to give up a major OF prospect. The M's don't have any big OF in their system, so it would be a big stretch to try and fill two of our OF spots with our own guys. We will be lucky if we can get one of our guys to become a decent major leaguer.
Posted by: ZBham | July 27, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Okay if it's 72% than fine, but I could've sworn it was higher, if someone has the book about Billy Beane it's in there... Let me know if you find it... My eyes tell me that Lopez is better and it's not just that four game series, even not withstanding, that's 3 times in 4 games which would be 120 times in a season, so even if he's half as careless that's still 60 times... I'll do the research and get back to you on it, but I'm running low on time as I work tonight.
My point is that Lopez is consistent, he's flirted with .300 the whole season and last year his brother died around the All-Star break and he had drop off statistically, which my hypothesis is that he was grieving the loss of his brother who he didn't get to bury, and also his brother was the one who taught him how to play baseball, so that had to also split hit focus when playing... As for the year before, he played more games that year than he ever had and I think it was an endurance thing... Now he's capable of withstanding the demands of 162 games and I think you'll see him flourish this year as it goes along... He's constantly coming up with the big hits and he's never injured like Roberts, which I think also has to be taken into consideration as Roberts has failed to play in less than 143 games 3 of the last 5 seasons... Roberts batting before a better 3-4-5 of Markakis, Huff, Scott has scored only 14 more runs and driven in 21 less so far. Roberts also hits 31 points lower in the second half and since the break is hitting a robust .175/.261/.300 with 0 SB, 3 R and 2 RBI... Definitely a streaky player, another thing Lopez is not. And with Lopez not having any brothers dying and not having to play 30+ more games than before, it stands to reason that he'll surpass Roberts in every offensive category by seasons end in my opinion.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Its not what Beane says, its a statistical calculation. Its based on how many times the gain in run expectancy offsets the losses which, I think for this season, still requires right around 72% success. That's what Beane/Depo used, but its not 72% for ever and ever, its based on hitting environment for a given season. Could drop to 67%, could jump to 77%.
(And I beg you not to make arguments based on runs. If Roberts isn't scoring, its not because he's doing something wrong, its because guys aren't hitting him in. The 44 point OBP difference does not (and cannot) lie; Roberts can't be an "unclutch" scorer after a single.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:23 PM
"A fair trade would be Austin Jackson, who I don't see as being much different than Alex Rios on the high side and probably Jose Cruz Jr on the low side."
LOL!!!!
Man, you are the most idiotic homer on mlbtraderumors.
Wow. Wow.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:24 PM
Obviously SB are a different story, but I'm refering to the main offensive categories XBH, AVG, OBP (maybe), SLG, etc.
As for the Mariners moving Beltre for salary relief is silly, he's a Type A player which gets us two top picks, if we hold onto him he makes us better, he helps support our young pitchers defensively, and honestly who cares what the team saves, we don't get a ticket discount, so we only need to worry about trades that make us better...
On any other team Melky Cabrera would be Fred Lewis, let's not get it twisted. Gardner is Juan Pierre. We aren't talking about Adam Jones (who I think is terribly overrated and average at best) or LaPorta for two months of Sabathia.
Considering the Mariners by all accounts has the worst lineup and Vidro has been the guy batting after Lopez I can more than make that assessment with a clear mind. Also it was Beane who created the moneyball theory/perfected it and it's his evaluation that led to the SB% being considered more closely... Also for reference Greg Maddux states that he doesn't care about SB as he says they rarely lead to runs, in his estimations a SB leads to a run less than 17% of the time... And yes, that's a quote!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:26 PM
BaseballGuru,
You can't just use a 4 game sample size and then try to draw meaningful conclusions. That's just not how statistics work. I mean you just as easily could have said, well he got thrown out 3 times in 1 game, so that would be 486 times in a season, so even if he's half as careless that's still 243 times. Do you see what I'm getting at here? You drew your initial conclusion based on a 4 game series (and it ended up actually being just 1 game from that series), and that conclusion is completely worthless. I'm sorry but if you've ever studied statistics (the actual math kind) you'd know this. Look your just wrong on this one. Can you please just admit it for once and move on.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Okay, and you must be the most unbiased poster as his 9 HR at AA project to 15 over a full season, with power development that numbe may double at best equaling 30 and with development he'll be a 20 HR guy in the majors, bet on it...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:27 PM
I sort of wish Melky Cabrera were Fred Lewis.
(Also, I'll take the over on Adam Jones +/- Average Baseball Player)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:28 PM
"Okay, and you must be the most unbiased poster as his 9 HR at AA project to 15 over a full season, with power development that numbe may double at best equaling 30 and with development he'll be a 20 HR guy in the majors, bet on it..."
LOL!!!!
He's 21 in AA. 21. In AA.
Of course, we're talking to Mr. Extrapolation = Projection.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:29 PM
Anyone want to take bets on whether or not BaseballGuru ever actually read Moneyball? Based on the things he's currently attributing to Beane I'm pretty sure he's never even skimmed it.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:29 PM
I'm not wrong, it's not proven, you've just stated that the answer is unknown... I agree with that... Then you rebuffed my statement with a sample size and claimed that to be more precise... Until we breakdown a whole season we don't know, which is why I said, I WILL DO THAT WHEN I HAVE TIME AS TONIGHT I WORK... I didn't say I was absolutely right, I said that I'm not willing to agree I'm wrong until I DO THE RESEARCH and KNOW I'm wrong until then we are both offering up perceptions which is neither right or wrong. Want to prove me wrong, grab some paper and a pen and start going through 2007 and 2008 and see what his per AB/G average is!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Did you read it?!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:31 PM
"Okay, and you must be the most unbiased poster as his 9 HR at AA project to 15 over a full season, with power development that numbe may double at best equaling 30 and with development he'll be a 20 HR guy in the majors, bet on it..."
I hate to pile on here, but this is lazy use of numbers. Do a quick search on "minor league park factors" and you'll see that Trenton is massive HR deflation park.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:31 PM
As for AA 21, how about we project Greg Halman's 24 HR/25SB at 20 across high A/AA this year through 93 games?! You think Jackson's better than that?! Oh wait, it must be because you either A) have never heard of Halman B) he's not a Yankee minor leaguer
or C) all of the above
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM
I've read it a lot. More times than Brian Roberts got popped on the bases in early April. It sits in my bathroom and when I run out of books I end up going back to it. Your comment on SB% is a textbook (pun) example of someone misunderstanding the book. Its not about walks, its not about hating HS players and its not about pulling one stat out of there without understanding it.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:34 PM
"I hate to pile on here, but this is lazy use of numbers. Do a quick search on "minor league park factors" and you'll see that Trenton is massive HR deflation park."
Yup.
More important to me, he's got 40 XBHs. Only 9 HRs, but 26 2Bs and 5 3Bs. For a 21 year old in AA, that's excellent. .295/.375/.451 line at the moment; .379/.455/.517 in July.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM
So what?! Even if that deflates his stats by 50% that means he has 13 HR in 2/3 a season?! So what he'd be on course for 20 HR in a smaller than MLB park?! Typical dimensions for a minor league park appear to be 310-315, 365-370, 390... That's a far cry from 325-345, 375-385, 405-420 for most major league stadiums. All I'm saying is that there are hundreds of players a year that put up Jacksons stat line across minor league baseball and that because he was the chosen one on paper doesn't make him the second coming of the messiah.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Or because he has a .320 OBP and has struck out over 110 times while walking less than 25.
And yes I did read Moneyball. Beane didn't come up with anything on his own. In fact, Sandy Alderson introduced him to the work that had already been done in the field and Beane learned as much as he could.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Trenton 3 Yr HR Park Factor: 84
High Desert 3 Yr HR Park Factor: 1.26
(Peeks into Guru's corner, waiting for the towel to come in)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:36 PM
(Oh damn you and your no edit feature, Typepad. There should not be a decimal point there. Its 126 to 84. 1.26 would probably be a park with 800 foot walls that somehow also discouraged inside the park HRs.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:38 PM
"As for AA 21, how about we project Greg Halman's 24 HR/25SB at 20 across high A/AA this year through 93 games?! You think Jackson's better than that?! Oh wait, it must be because you either A) have never heard of Halman B) he's not a Yankee minor leaguer
or C) all of the above"
I don't 'project' minor league stats.
I don't know his leagues; are they hitters leagues? Pitchers leagues? Does his home park suppress or help HRs? What are his CSes? (SBs (outside of 60 SB) guys in single-A are meaningless; catchers in A ball stink).
No, I don't know much about Halman.
However, here's a good read: http://www.minorleagueball.com/2008/6/18/553727/controversial-prospect-gre
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:38 PM
Well, sorry that I don't live and die by the book Moneyball, most of anything is meant to be glanced at and forgotten, few things are worth retaining... Plus anybody can say they read the book, but that doesn't mean you comprehend it or put it into practice with your analysis... The fact is that everyone seems to over value SBs, period. I like a guy being able to steal a base when we need it, but most of those guys never make it to the majors because 30 GMs know something we at home clearly don't, is that in your book?!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:39 PM
"So what?! Even if that deflates his stats by 50% that means he has 13 HR in 2/3 a season?! So what he'd be on course for 20 HR in a smaller than MLB park?! Typical dimensions for a minor league park appear to be 310-315, 365-370, 390... That's a far cry from 325-345, 375-385, 405-420 for most major league stadiums. All I'm saying is that there are hundreds of players a year that put up Jacksons stat line across minor league baseball and that because he was the chosen one on paper doesn't make him the second coming of the messiah."
STAT LINES IN THE MINORS ARE NOT THE END ALL BE ALL!
There are SO many different leagues in the minors. You can NOT project minor league stats to the majors. Otherwise, Nelson Cruz = future HOFer, right?
The two most important things to take from a guy's minor league stats are A) pitch recognition (not swinging at balls, swinging at strikes), and B) squaring the ball on the bat when you swing (this leads to power).
Get a clue, man.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Most people: SBs are great! They help my fantasy team.
Guru: SBs are overrated. Beane said so.
Me (and others): SBs are overrated and here's the mathematical reasons why.
There is a vast difference between regurgitating (which you did above) and understanding (which I'd like to think I helped you do).
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:41 PM
I know you're wrong on the Brian Roberts thing because I understand stats and I know that no one gets cut down on the bases 30% of the time they make it on base. That just bat$h!t crazy. You also have completely left aside the fact that Lopez also gets thrown out on the bases and Roberts aggressive baserunning can also help his team at times.
You are honestly one of the dumbest, most stubborn people I've ever debated with online. Sadly I had a longrunning argument with one guy who believed Pujols would hit 500 HRs by the end of his year 30 season so its going to take some more work for you to get to the top spot
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:42 PM
But man, I really can't stop laughing that this guy thought AUSTIN JACKSON was a FAIR TRADE for WASHBURN!!!
ROFL!
The Mariners aren't finding anybody willing to give a half decent prospect, and eat his salary for them.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Tell ya what, we'll give you Pavano for Halman and Clement, ROFL!
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:45 PM
http://seamheads.com/blog/2008/06/10/truer-park-factors/
a post about the flaws of park analysis and how they shouldn't change but they do and that it's also subject to the players who play there... So while it may be easier to hit in high desert, the 25 HR by Halman and the many homeruns hit by the other guys on that team will actually work against the stats whereas there's really nobody hitting homeruns in Trenton besides Jackson and one or two other guys, so it can make it look less favorable...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:46 PM
Not Joe Morgan: states what he feels
Guru: states what he's found in research and trusts the knowledge of paid professionals.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Park factors are certainly not a be all, end all and little fluctuations or a three point difference can and should be ignored. But this is 126 to 84. Thats wider than Coors to Oakland. That, my friend, is still a big deal.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Do you want me to explain run expectancy to you? Because you can recite Beane all you want; I can explain to you the tool that Depodesta utilized to give Beane the information that allowed him to give the quote that you posted here.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:51 PM
Funny that it appears the Yankees are balking at Gardner AND Cabrera, which I think has to be worth more than Jackson, but maybe you can tell me how I would be wrong there?! So Maybe Jackson an unproven player based on projection as you all state is not as valueable as Cabrera, right?! Or wait, so everything you all have been saying has been hypocritically said to oppose my views, got it!!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:52 PM
"Not Joe Morgan: states what he feels
Guru: states what he's found in research and trusts the knowledge of paid professionals."
Guru = idiotic homer who thinks Mariners players/prospects are 10x better than any other team's. Yet is consistently surprised at how godawful his team/prospects end up. LOL!
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:52 PM
(Also, I find it almost sad that you're trying to fall back on the "I use stats, you use feel" defense on a guy who is destroying you with stats. You're even spitting that back out wrong.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Mariners have 5 guys who have or will hit 20+ HRs there and many others with a handful plus already... That my friend is a lot more than the 40 the Trenton AA team has hit as whole.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | July 27, 2008 at 10:54 PM
"Funny that it appears the Yankees are balking at Gardner AND Cabrera, which I think has to be worth more than Jackson, but maybe you can tell me how I would be wrong there?! So Maybe Jackson an unproven player based on projection as you all state is not as valueable as Cabrera, right?! Or wait, so everything you all have been saying has been hypocritically said to oppose my views, got it!!"
Jackson's upside is MUCH higher than Cabrera's.
I'm not high on Gardner, at all. But even Gardner is too much to give up in a salary dump. They're both likely 4th outfielder types, but they both have value to the 2008 Yankees (Melky because the Yankees need good defense in CF, and have no replacement CF if he's gone, Gardner will likely be a pinch runner in the playoffs).
The Yankees will not give any near-ML ready talent to the Mariners in a salary dump. Neither will ANY OTHER major league team.
If the Mariners don't give in, they can just enjoy paying Washburn the remainder of his contract as they continue to wallow in mediocrity.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM
In a low HR environment. We can't say this anymore. Its consistent over several years (as players pass through) so I'm not even sure where the argument is. Its like ignoring that Duchscherer is benefiting from Oakland or that Holliday gets a big bump from Coors.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:55 PM
First of all, he never says that Park Factors should never change, and in fact we should actually expect them to change as weather conditions aren't going to be constant from year to year. Second, you obviously have no idea how park factors are calculated. They compare how players hit in one park to how they hit in every other park in the league. So, just because a bunch of guys on one team hit a lot of HRs, that has no bearing on the park factor. What would effect it would be if all those guys were hitting a lot of HRs at home than they were on the road, while visiting teams also hit more HRs in that park than they did in other parks.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:56 PM
"Mariners have 5 guys who have or will hit 20+ HRs there and many others with a handful plus already... That my friend is a lot more than the 40 the Trenton AA team has hit as whole."
The Mariners are going to have the best offense in the majors in a couple years, OMG!!!!
(Not).
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Mariners stud prospects:
Balentien: http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/392076
Clement:
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/590370
ROFL!
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:58 PM
GURU do youm realize NO ONE ON THIS ENTIRE SITE LIKES YOU.
You are arrogant,annoying and just plain stupid.
Even Tim doesn't like you.
Posted by: yankees2727 | July 27, 2008 at 10:59 PM
That should obviously be a lot more HRs at home than on the road...
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 10:59 PM
I wish Jackson were a lefty just so he could benefit from an HR friendly environment once he got to the majors while the Seattle hitters would go to one that favors pitchers. Then we'd all meet back here in 3 years and discuss.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 10:59 PM
"You are arrogant,annoying and just plain stupid."
I actually enjoy arrogance, it just needs to be appropriate.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 11:01 PM
"I wish Jackson were a lefty just so he could benefit from an HR friendly environment once he got to the majors while the Seattle hitters would go to one that favors pitchers. Then we'd all meet back here in 3 years and discuss."
I'm glad he's not - the Yankees need some RH power on their team going forward.
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 11:04 PM
That's what Teixeira will be for.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 11:06 PM
(When necessary, of course. I imagine Joe II won't stop him from hitting lefty against the right handers.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 27, 2008 at 11:07 PM
"Guru: states what he's found in research and trusts the knowledge of paid professionals."
I have no doubt that if we were arguing who is the better slugger between Rob Deer and John Jaha, you could probably muster up enough stats to nearly prove one is better. The problem is, you make assumptions based on what you have read, and consider those to be fact. Believe what you read by the professionals, I mostly do. But you make ridiculous conclusions based on what you have read. Using these facts you read only roughly support 10% of your opinions.
Posted by: Know ID yuh | July 27, 2008 at 11:32 PM
You guys have all proven your short-sightedness. I, not Capper, was the one who used Jose Cruz Jr. about the farm-system idea. Prior to this year the Mariners farm system WAS INDEED something good. Cruz Jr, in particular, sparked the interest of many a'team when he left Seattle. You guys are pretty messed up to rake a guy over the coals for him almost dying on the baseball field and ending his career. Real smooth, wannabe scouts...
I still have yet to see a blogger (and not just the writers) on here be right about a single speculation they have made. Until I see someone actually get one of these speculations right, whether it be JoeMorgan or Baseball_guru, it doesn't matter whether the Brewers offer Jabba the Hutt for the Mets' Boba Fett we've all been pretty way off.
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 27, 2008 at 11:33 PM
You guys have all proven your short-sightedness. I, not Capper, was the one who used Jose Cruz Jr. about the farm-system idea. Prior to this year the Mariners farm system WAS INDEED something good. Cruz Jr, in particular, sparked the interest of many a'team when he left Seattle. You guys are pretty messed up to rake a guy over the coals for him almost dying on the baseball field and ending his career. Real smooth, wannabe scouts...
I still have yet to see a blogger (and not just the writers) on here be right about a single speculation they have made. Until I see someone actually get one of these speculations right, whether it be JoeMorgan or Baseball_guru, it doesn't matter whether the Brewers offer Jabba the Hutt for the Mets' Boba Fett we've all been pretty way off.
PS, Baseball is a statistical game and statistics can be made to portray negative OR positive light on a fact. Just depends on which direction the truth is bent towards.
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 27, 2008 at 11:36 PM
"You guys have all proven your short-sightedness. I, not Capper, was the one who used Jose Cruz Jr. about the farm-system idea. Prior to this year the Mariners farm system WAS INDEED something good. Cruz Jr, in particular, sparked the interest of many a'team when he left Seattle. You guys are pretty messed up to rake a guy over the coals for him almost dying on the baseball field and ending his career. Real smooth, wannabe scouts..."
Can anyone parse this thing for me? I'd really like to respond, but I honestly have no idea where to begin.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 27, 2008 at 11:49 PM
Regardless of whether JCJ was super-duper or not, let's agree on one thing: The Ms have a half-way decent farm-system (which may be showing signs of weakening). Fair enough?
Back to Washburn... Who thinks the deal is dead? I might.
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM
I would give up shelly maybe or chris britton maybe wassbourn is old Wang right know is better guru we aren't getting him of four years ago he should have a 4.4 era today if he. Started with yanks that's worth shelly he worth six mil a year he is a four starter maybe brunney he worth something not slot guru overhypes him and Morgan sells him short
Posted by: mynameborat | July 28, 2008 at 12:04 AM
not dead ms will lower likes pirates they know what he is worth
Posted by: mynameborat | July 28, 2008 at 12:08 AM
I don't know how good there minor league system is currently, but I would certainly agree that they have done a good job producing prospects recently. They were able to put together a deal for Bedard and still have a few hyped prospects left, so at least recently they've done well.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 28, 2008 at 12:10 AM
ms have good talent but there selfish there not team players and there poorly coached and guru knows something but. Goes overboard Wang is elite jarod is average player that can help a teAm you guys all no jarod is no Wang even guru today he is no Wang he is old
Posted by: mynameborat | July 28, 2008 at 12:15 AM
ms minor has done well there is no question with that the yanks have good prosects to
Posted by: mynameborat | July 28, 2008 at 12:18 AM
Mariners stud prospects:
Balentien: http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/392076
Clement:
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/590370
ROFL!
Posted by: V | July 27, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Do you want me to post what Hugues has done in the majors?
Posted by: ZBham | July 28, 2008 at 12:46 AM
There is no need to talk about the rumor about washburn anymore. He is not a good pitcher so mariners want to dump him and fans here want to dump him,too. They want to get something much more valuable than washburn. Mission Impossible. It is that simple.
Posted by: gurupig | July 28, 2008 at 02:59 AM
I'm not quite sure why Jeb and joe Morgan think I pointed out Jose Cruz Jr.....All i said was he is still playing......I never said anything about him being a super star or anything....although teams tripped all over themselves trying to get him from Seattle before he was traded to Toronto.
Also, making th generalization that Seattle baseball fans are ignorant just shows what kind of ass you are......you make comments about USSM and their thread about Washburn being great.....and evidently didn't read it it, or have someone literate read it to you, because it was all about sarcasm.......see, they hate Washburn and want him gone.
If the wanks don't need Washburn, then fine, move along....but evidently the people running the team, who know more than you, seem very interested.
Posted by: Capper | July 28, 2008 at 03:47 AM
God, this site is full of some of the stupidest people I've ever seen.......you want to link stats for a couple of young players who have 100 or so ABs and say they suck?
Honestly, for as good as some of the posting is here by the staff, this site draws some of the stupidest people I've ever seen.
Posted by: Capper | July 28, 2008 at 03:50 AM
I agree capper. Saying Balentine and Clement are not good prospects because of their very limited numbers is ridiculus. By that standard Philip Hughes isnt a good prospect, and maybe the M's should get Hughes for Washburn. (I'm Kidding Yankees fans).
Posted by: ZBham | July 28, 2008 at 04:46 AM
"Do you want me to post what Hugues has done in the majors?"
Before, or after, his fractured ribs?
Posted by: V | July 28, 2008 at 08:14 AM
"I agree capper. Saying Balentine and Clement are not good prospects because of their very limited numbers is ridiculus. By that standard Philip Hughes isnt a good prospect, and maybe the M's should get Hughes for Washburn. (I'm Kidding Yankees fans)."
Apparently, sarcasm is lost on some.
I was mocking Mr. 'Guru' for his laughable suggestion that Washburn would be worth Austin Jackson in a trade.
Posted by: V | July 28, 2008 at 08:15 AM
I don't get why I was lumped in as anti-Jose Cruz Jr. I actually like(d) the guy; nice plate discipline with some pop.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 28, 2008 at 09:58 AM
So just for Guru, I actually went back to all of Baltimore's April games versus the mariners and looked at the box scores. You know, where they SHOW if someone runs into an out. And you're basing your entire analysis of his "crazy baserunning" ON 1 GAME!
Only in one of the 7 April orioles-mariners games did Roberts ever run into outs. That game, saturday april 5th, he was caught stealing 3rd, caught stretching a double, and thrown out at the plate on an infield fielder's choice. But he didn't make another baserunning error the rest of the series, or the later series in April. So please make your analysis of Roberts and his baserunning flaws on more than one game.
Posted by: McGrifftheCrimeDog | July 28, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Guru got brutalized here. It was like that bar scene in Good Will Hunting with the blond ponytailed guy.
- Good Not Joe Morgan
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM