![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rosenthal's Latest: Rangers, Yankees, Phillies | Main | Odds and Ends: Indians, Livan, Braves, Friedman »
Hot off the press from SI.com's Jon Heyman:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55470c8138834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heyman's Latest: Sabathia, Dunn, Huff, Mora:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The Giants should sign CC.. and trade Sanchez and some younger pitchers for Jimmy Rollins or get JJ Hardy for less... 2009 NL West champs baby!
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 11:29 AM
"The Giants should sign CC.. and trade Sanchez and some younger pitchers for Jimmy Rollins or get JJ Hardy for less... 2009 NL West champs baby!"
Edit...
The Giants should sign CC...have him eat Barry Zito... and trade Sanchez and some younger pitchers for Jimmy Rollins or get JJ Hardy for less... 2009 NL West champs baby!
Posted by: Jared78 | August 25, 2008 at 11:43 AM
How is no one interested in Huff. He's having a crazy good year. I hope the Yanks trade for him in the winter. Hes a great player. Now the Giants have great staring pitching anyway. Now if they take that money for C.C and get some hitters, than they are in buisness in 2009. They're goin to have an awsome team in the future anyway, I know they got pitching but does anybody know if they got some power hitters in the minors.
Posted by: yankfan1 | August 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM
if the giants wanted to be smart they would take their second most proven commodity and trade him for pieces that can mature in the majors.
I would trade Cain to the brewers for Alcides, Gamel and Cain/Green (whomever doesnt go to the Indians as a PTBNL). The Giants can put Alcides and Gamel in MLB by mid 2009.
The brewers would have a rotation of Gallardo, Cain, Parra, and whomever.
Posted by: jdubs | August 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM
If LA and SF are willing to be serious contenders in the CC Sweepstakes, I'd imagine a sleeper would have to be the Diamondbacks...Imagine a front 3 of Webb, Sabathia, and Haren..that trio would be almost impossible to beat in a playoff series.
Posted by: EndyChavezActionHero | August 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Huff has 69 extra-base hits? Wow. He's having a nice bounceback year. It's hard to believe that it's all just a fluke. I'm not saying he'll hit that much in '09 but he might be good for a solid 20 HRs at least, health willing.
Posted by: basemonkey | August 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM
trading cain is plain dumb. the guy is a stud.. people forget he's younger than lincecum.. plus hes locked up cheap.. the guy is a keeper.. The Giants proabably wont get CC, but they should still trade for a SS and play Sandoval at 3rd. Rollins or Hardy would be ideal.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM
I find Blake's comments interesting. It suggests that 1) the Dodgers have a solid shot at Sabathia (something we all knew) and 2) Blake is interested in returning as well.
Posted by: AA | August 25, 2008 at 12:27 PM
I find it interesting that the Yankees are continuously referred to as the frontrunners for Sabathia. After all, it seems like the rationale behind this observation is predicated entirely upon the Yankees' financial clout.
Sabathia and those closest to him have repeatedly made reference to a disinclination on the part of the pitcher toward playing on the East Coast in general and New York in particular. Furthermore, it's safe to assume that there will be comparable offers coming from every contender not falling under the 'small market' categorization; after all, it isn't every day that an elite and durable pitcher under the age of 30 hits the market. If, in fact, Sabathia is willing to weigh considerations other than money alone- as most reports suggest- I'm not sure how the Yankees can be seen as the leading contender to acquire his services.
Frankly, I agree with Blake; that Manny-mania aside, the Dodgers will make a heavy push for CC over the off-season. It may not be quite what the Yanks are offering but based on his preference to play out west (he's building a home near Anaheim), he'll sacrifice a few measly million. It's not he'll be hurting for money, regardless of his decision. Minimum, he'll be pulling in over $100 million over the duration of the contract, whether it's in New York or LA (or elsewhere). Based on the peripheral stories and statements we've been hearing then, wouldn't it seem logical that Sabathia choose to go where he feels most comfortable?!
There's little doubt New York will be in the mix, and they may very well wind up the last team standing, but I'd hold off on declaring a victor- or even a front-runner- just yet.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM
>>> Yankfan1
The Giants have some guys with potential pop down in low-A and below: Angel Villalona, who just turned 18 and has almost as many homers, and Nick Noonan, a 2B who's still young but projected to grow into some power.
In short-season, there's a guy too: Michael Ambort, He hit three-dongs the other night, and looks to finally be distancing himself from health problems that kept him from being drafted in the first or 2nd round a while back.
Other than that, Ishikawa and Pablo Sandoval, who just joined the team, could put up big numbers next year, and then it's a waiting game: the guys from this year's draft class with HR potential: Kieschnick, Posey, Rafael Ramirez, another 16 yo from the DR.
I have no worries about the rebuilding plan. We're loaded, I think.
Posted by: The Management | August 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Is it me or has Mat Gamel not homered much lately? His numbers are still sick but he is at 16 homeruns and I thought I remembered him being around 14 two months ago. Wonder if Laporta being moved has effected his ability to get pitches to drive. Any word on his defense this year as well? I know he has been a butcher at third, wasn't sure if he is improving
Posted by: Jared78 | August 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM
How are the Giants supposed to trade for quality talent when they won't give up anything decent on their end?
The team really only has Lincecum and Cain at the top tier. Next you have Sanchez, Wilson, and Lewis. Winn, Molina and Rowand are fine but their contracts really negate any value they have from a trade perspective.
So, how do you propose landing impact players and still hold on to Lincecum and Cain?
Posted by: bjsguess | August 25, 2008 at 01:19 PM
...As for Huff (and to a lesser extent, Mora), I don't entirely understand the logic that they could be more easily moved over the winter. Oh, I get that there could be more teams involved, as everyone becomes a contender for '09 once '08 has concluded. Still, I can't imagine an impact bat like Huff's would have more VALUE in the off-season as opposed to the middle of a playoff race. After all, wouldn't a potential post-season candidate be more willing to part with a top prospect in August, when the number of available options are at a minimum and the stakes are at a season-high? Wouldn't a player of Huff's caliber seem more desirable when his contributions might have make-or-break consequences?
Let's face it...as good as Huff has been and even if we assume he continues at the same pace in '09, he lacks the cache' of similarly productive players. Furthermore, his lack of a true defensive position or presence hurts the way a club perceives his value when piecing together their roster. While, in August/September, you hear 'impact bat,' and dream of Huff's fantastic slugging percentage and OPS boosting a good offense into the realm of greatness...and perhaps a World Series title, come January/February you see a DH whose body of work coming into 2008 left much to be desired. In short, clubs make more measured moves over the winter. August is the time for dramatic, throw-out-all-the-stops, go-for-broke moves that perhaps sacrifice a little bit of the future for the sake of the opportunity that exists HERE and NOW. And, on the flip-side, it's the time for lesser clubs like the O's to take advantage of that kind of impulsiveness; sacrificing the better parts of the otherwise mediocre (or worse) here and now for a chance at a brighter future.
If McPhail and the Orioles wait until the winter, hoping more teams means better offers, I fear that they'll be sorely disappointed...and that the long suffering fans in Baltimore will be forced to once again endure empty promises of a return to former glories from a front office that doesn't know the way.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 25, 2008 at 01:21 PM
>>> bjsguess
I agree completely, the Giants can't land a top tier talent without giving one up. Right now, that means giving up Lincecum or Cain without anyone to replace them. However, in a few years the Giants may be able to trade one of them and replace them with one of the pitchers they have in the organization (Bumgarner or Alderson, if they pan out). For now, they can trade Jonathan Sanchez or Noah Lowry once he's healthy and get a smaller return.
Posted by: angryseals | August 25, 2008 at 01:41 PM
"Heyman believes a claim on Paul Byrd would've made sense for the Yanks".
Byrd has a 5.40 era in Boston and has given up 16 hits and 4 homers in 13 innings. The Yankees have Ponson and Rasner that can do that....and not for the prorated 7.5 mill Byrd is earning.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | August 25, 2008 at 03:29 PM
Cain and Lincecum arent going anywhere. the thing is the Giants don't really need to trade either one of em to get a big name bat.. they got a handful of young position players that can handle the load next year and be decent - Lewis, Burris, Sandoval, Bowker, Scherholtz and soon Posey and Vilalona.
They really need a middle infielder (preferably a SS) that is decent = Hardy. So Sanchez for Hardy to me is a fair deal and makes sense for both teams.
If they want more, we can throw em Randy Winn - whos a better player than Hardy but we have too many OFs..
In regards to CC.. I mean it would be great to get a guy like CC and the Giants will have the $$ (even with Shito's contract), but its not a necessity. Signing CC just makes it easier to trade Sanchez and one of the 2 aces we have in the minors (Bum and Alderson). BUT I mean they should definitely make an offer to see if he'll take a home town discount.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:10 PM
angryseals ... I get that. Totally. A fair and reasonable approach.
I just wonder what good it will do them in a few years though. The real value of Cain and Lincecum is that they are good pitchers AND cheap. In a few years that won't be the case. By then they will still most likely be good but expensive. Good pitching can always be acquired through FA at a price.
Seems like they could move both now for some top tier talent that is still a few years away. A team that is on a tight budget, has loads of minor league talent, and is close to competing would drool at the possibility of signing either guy.
My guess is that the Giants will continue to rebuild for next few years. Both Lincecum and Cain will remain solid. The payroll will remain about the same (somewhere between $75-90m). By 2011 Cain will be in the last year of his contract and looking at making a killing in FA. Lincecum will be raking in big bucks through arb. The youngsters in the system are now starting to get acclimated to big league life. The Giants will then face a major decision about what to do with either pitcher. If they walk then the Giants will need to rebuild their rotation again. If they sign them the Giants will have a massive payroll (Zito is on the books until 2014).
Posted by: bjsguess | August 25, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Ohan - you believe the Giants are SS away from competing with real teams (not just those guys in the NL West)?
Posted by: bjsguess | August 25, 2008 at 04:13 PM
No.. but its a step in that direction.. I mean.. dont get me wrong the Giants sucked this year.. but we came out with a good starting LFer (lewis), a CLOSER, 2 stud SPs, and Sanchez a good 3rd starter. plus a couple of other potentially good position players with more waiting in the wings. Hardy would be a great pick up and if we got CC and dont see why people wouldn't consider us contenders.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:21 PM
the payroll is going to be an issue.. but the Giants have money.. and continue to get richer with the ballpark. We're not the A's who have to trade young talent away - we can sign these guys! I think the Giants will have the $$ to sign both or at least one of the Cain/Lince duo.. and they might not need to sign one of em b/c they have a lot of depth in SP in low A ball.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:24 PM
haha.. no the kids name is Madison Bumgarner or something but look at his stats and Tim Aldersons.. these guys are putting up similar numbers to what Lincecum did in his short minor league stint..
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:28 PM
Nate Scherholtz, Pablo Sandoval, Buster Posey and Angel Vilalona.. watch out for these guys
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Dude.. I'm not saying were going to contend next year - and to be honest with you, I don't really care, but we're going to be better. We've rebuilt our farm system and came out of this season with some real ball players.
But cmon.. IF we actually land CC, keep Cain, and trade for Hardy?? don't you think we'd be a team to watch out for?
Hey.. what do you guys think it'll take for the Giants to get Rollins from Philly?
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 04:53 PM
Just wondering.. with all the drama going on in Philly and Rollins having a rough year.. might be an opportunity to bring him back home to the Bay Area too.
CC would probably dig playing with another East Bay Native.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 05:01 PM
You've misquoted Heyman, Tim, on Mora & Huff. He didn't say no one was interested. He said there "appears to be no trade action on them." This is very, very different.
Posted by: Playwright | August 25, 2008 at 05:12 PM
Joelcards:
See this is my point
I don't see why the Giants should deal Cain now, when we could keep him for 3 more years and trade Sanchez and prospects for decent position players..
the giants are bad this year but they are not far off from being a .500 team.
And they've got money to spend in the future.
I'd rather get a guy like Hardy for Sanchez + than a bunch of 19-20 year old position players that need 3 years in the minors for Cain.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 05:24 PM
By the way those prospects you guys mentioned from Texas and Mil. have some pretty bad minor league numbers.
Posted by: Ohan | August 25, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Baseball America says the Giants have two of the four hottest prospect right now: http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2008/266736.html
And with Madison Bumgarner leading all minor league pitchers in ERA, few people are saying he's not the best pitching prospect in the minors.
With a tip of the hat to David Price.
Posted by: The Management | August 25, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Let's play best case scenario. When will Alderson and Bumgarner realistically make an appearance in the bigs? How many years until they reach their potential? 3 years - maybe more?
By then you no longer have a cheap combo in Lincecum and Cain. That's my point. Why not move them now for talent that will be ready in the next few years. Then all your young talent will be cheap, controllable, and the Giants will have plenty of room to fill in any gaps via FA.
Posted by: bjsguess | August 26, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Are you guys on drugs? Rollins AND Carrasco for Cain!!?? Cain isnt worth anything close to that much. Those 2 would NEVER be included in a deal together unless it was for a TOP TOP TIPP TOP tier player. Dream on Giants fans....
Posted by: Brando | August 26, 2008 at 08:04 AM
not to mention the phils have no intentions of moving rollins anytime soon...
Posted by: Brando | August 26, 2008 at 08:05 AM
Dodgers are gonna grab cc
he wants 2 stick w/ the nl, and hes fishin 4 a socal home, padres are gonna slash there payroll and the giants dont wanna pay $100MM for one guy (we saw how that worked out last time for them)
dodgers are probobly his secong choice and the only one of the top two that will sign him.
Posted by: DodgerFanMan | August 26, 2008 at 11:57 AM
WHY would CC want go to SF..thought he wanted to win! CC will go to NYY and Sheets to the cubs! haha
Posted by: cubs land | August 26, 2008 at 04:49 PM
The Cubs don't win for 100 years, and all of a sudden they're chatty? When the season ends with one more in the loss column, then show your exuberance.
Posted by: The Management | August 26, 2008 at 05:50 PM
SIGN CC! I didn't think we could because the Yankees will throw a ton of cash at him but the Yankees are stupid and will overpay Sheets or Burnett or someone else so if we could just do something like 18 mil for 6 years, that would be great. It's a lot of money but the Giants are not a small market team and Lincecum, Cain and young position players like Fred Lewis, Pablo Sandoval, Travis Ishikawa, Eugenio Velez and Nate Schierholtz are all signed for cheap right now. We have the money and instead of getting another Zito/Rowand, how about actually getting the best FA on the market (which we haven't done since Bonds in 1992). When we missed out on Vlad, we showed our tendency to always get a second tier FA and it hasn't worked so far so let's try a different approach.
To free up more money and a spot in the rotation, package Sanchez and Randy Winn for prospects and cash. Winn is due 8 million so that frees up a lot. Also, Durham's contract will be off the books, Vizquel will be gone (though I'd love him back in the organization once he retires as a coach and someday manager) and Aurilia is gone too.
With CC, even with a power-starved lineup, the Giants will definitely contend. They are a speedy team and the young guys don't have much pop yet but can hit for average (see Sandoval, Burriss, etc.). With a rotation of Lincecum, Sabathia, Cain, Zito, (Correia, Lowry, Bumgarner or Alderson will all work), this is a contending team in a weak NL West.
Posted by: IVSPORT | September 02, 2008 at 01:05 PM