![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rosenthal's Latest: Mets, Brewers, Astros | Main | Perrotto's Latest: La Russa, Offseason Moves »
Chris Haft of MLB.com reports the Giants have promoted first round draft pick Conor Gillaspie after just 24 games at the pro-level, making him the first of his class to reach the show:
Manager Bruce Bochy said that Gillaspie wouldn't start a game immediately but might be available sooner for pinch-hitting. The 21-year-old spent the previous few weeks batting a combined .269 with no home runs and 15 RBIs for the Giants' Rookie-level Arizona League affiliate and short-season Salem-Keizer, so playing in the Majors would be an ambitious leap.
Gillaspie is a left-handed bat and if he shows anything this month and/or in spring training, he could earn a spot at a position with no given regular projected for 2009. This may be a speculative call up, however. Hitting only .269 with no homeruns, Gillaspie hasn't shown a whole lot in pro-ball to merit this call up for competitive reasons, and the Giants certainly want to try to be competitive next season, don't they?
Clay Timpner was sent down to Triple-A to make room for Gillaspie.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5550913f48834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gillaspie Promoted To Giants:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
He's related to Cole on the Brewers right?
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | September 07, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Simply baffled. The guy doesn't even know what it is to be a professional baseball player yet, and you're going to throw him into the MLB? What good can come out of this?
Posted by: Adam H. | September 07, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Well the Giants haven't had a lot of success moving their position prospects into the lineup. This is a novel approach, that's for sure.
Posted by: barnetto | September 07, 2008 at 11:55 AM
My guess is that it probably was promised during negotiations, though not part of the contract - basically a side deal. It'd be surprising if he spends much time in the majors next year, though the team does consider him to be an "advanced bat" coming out of college and what he did in Cape Code last year.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | September 07, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Pretty Stupid. If you are only gonna use him as a pinch hitter, this move rivals the Nats calling up Ross Detwiler in September. Takes up a 40 man roster spot, starts his clock, does everything that shouldn't be done when he's hitting what he was in rookie ball.
Posted by: DraftInfo | September 07, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Tim and everybody else,
What does this mean for Clay? He had to be outrighted to triple-A, meaning Gillaspie took his spot on the 40-man roster. To get him back to the big-show, they will have to purchase his contract again. Is this any indicator of his future with the Giants?
Posted by: Scronjsn11 | September 07, 2008 at 01:11 PM
ballerwhiteboy, the brewers outfield prospect's last name is
gillespie, this is gillaspie. If
they are related, I have no idea, but they have different last names.
Posted by: brandon | September 07, 2008 at 01:47 PM
I don't think there's anything wrong with this. He came out of this draft as one of the more advanced bats in the draft. Don't use his small sample size of pro ball to date as an argument against bringing him up. Clay Timpner has no future with this team anyway. He's not replacing anyone of importance. Maybe the Giants think he has a legit chance to be their 3b next year.
Posted by: cobweb25 | September 07, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Really advanced bat that's hitting 269 in rookie ball with no jacks? If this was my team, Toronto, I would be livid at the stupidity. Don't be a homer about this, this is pretty clear cut dumb.
Posted by: The_Bunk | September 07, 2008 at 02:44 PM
A couple weeks up at the show will do nothing for his development long term. I have no clue what the Giants are thinking.
Posted by: bjsguess | September 07, 2008 at 02:53 PM
More proof as to why Sabean is one of the worst GM's in MLB. Adam H. and DraftInfo are absolutely correct on this. They use a 40-man roster spot when they didn't need to and they start using his options before they had too (unless they prematurely stick with him out of spring training next year). I am not too concerned about having him in the majors prematurely unless they stick with him next year. Giving top prospects a cup of coffee in September doesn't bother me. But sticking a guy on the 40-man roster unnecessarily is just stupid.
Posted by: mymrbig | September 07, 2008 at 03:19 PM
"nothing for his development long term?" From everything I've heard, there is a big adjustment getting used to the major league life style. Earl Weaver thought it was a big enough adjustment that he recommends that starting pitchers be brought up as a reliever their first season and be allowed to adjust and get to pitch in ideal situations to boost their confidence and to learn. This would help him get over that sooner than later.
One point supporting this view is that the Giants did not promise that he would even get to play during his time up.
Plus, I don't see where him getting any jacks has much bearing on him coming up. He's known to have very little power. If hitting homers is a prerequisite for him getting a call up, he probably won't get a call up for a long time. Duane Kuiper might never have got the call up.
He's suppose to be an advanced hitter. Maybe they like what they saw even if he didn't hit for much, which is always plagued by small samples.
Posted by: obsessivegiantscompulsive | September 07, 2008 at 03:24 PM
Thanks brandon. This might even hurt his progress like Homer Bailey.
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | September 07, 2008 at 03:49 PM
I can't seem to find the stats anywhere, but I'm pretty sure he had a bad first week in the minors, and then picked it up really quickly for the next few weeks. While it doesn't really justify calling him up to the majors, his hitting well recently at least helps in understanding a move like this. I'm not thrilled that he's on the 40 man roster so soon, but perhaps just being able to get a look at his swing and plate approach will help the Giants figure out exactly what they have in Gillaspie?
If they still think he could be up by 2010, it might prevent the Giants from going after a longterm 1B/3B this offseason, hoping that Sandoval and Gillaspie can fill the positions in the next couple of years at a fraction of the price.
Posted by: angryseals | September 07, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Its been suggested that the timing of this move will not cost Gillaspie an option in that he'll now qualify for a 4th option. If that is the case then the matter becomes how valuable is this particular 40 man roster spot? Ultimately it seems this was done to get him in front of the major league staff for evaluation purposes. I think given his prior success in the cape league they think he can move fast and as suggested in a prior comment preclude the Giants from going after a longterm 1B/3B solution. I wonder though if his longterm position isn't 2nd.
Posted by: SF_BBFan | September 08, 2008 at 12:10 AM
For those saying this starts the clock, let's look at that more closely, and feel free to correct whatever mistakes I make.
As a player with less than 5 years MLB experience, he can be optioned to the minors for 4 seasons without having to clear waivers. That means 1 option has been eaten up, and Gillaspie could be controlled until the end of the 2011 season.
If the Giants don't know about Conor by that time, I'd say he's a bust. And like Sabean said, he's at the right place at the right time, playing a position the Giants need. Let's hope he really is better with a wooden bat than a metal, like Conor says.
Posted by: The Management | September 08, 2008 at 08:53 AM