![]() |
|
|
| |
« Angels Exercise Guerrero, Lackey Options; Decline Anderson | Main | Weathers Willing To Play Anywhere »
According to George King and Bart Hubbuch of the New York Post, the Brewers have informed teams they'll listen to offers for first baseman Prince Fielder. Fielder, 24, hit .276/.372/.507 in 694 plate appearances this year. He's under team control for three more years; his salary will increase drastically as he goes through the arbitration process for the first time this offseason.
The article's authors do not see the Yankees as suitors for Fielder, due to his defense and the team's long-term desire to move Derek Jeter to first base after the 2010 season. The Jeter logic seems a little shaky, since Fielder is only under team control through 2011.
I discussed six possible Fielder suitors earlier this month. The question is, who's willing to give up good young pitching?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535c00f4a970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brewers To Listen On Fielder:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The A's might make sense. Getting him out of the NL. Could DH him?
God knows Oakland has the pitching
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | October 28, 2008 at 03:30 PM
"The article's authors do not see the Yankees as suitors for Fielder, due to his defense and the team's long-term desire to move Derek Jeter to first base after the 2010 season. The Jeter logic seems a little shaky, since Fielder is only under team control through 2011."
Then the articles authors are morons (which most that write for the Post are). If the Yanks plan on moving Jeter, why are they mentioned in EVERY single Teixeira rumor? Not saying they have interest in Prince, but if they don't, it sint cause of Jeter. We will see Posada at 1st way before we see Jeter there.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | October 28, 2008 at 03:35 PM
The Giants definitely will be in on the Fielder sweepstakes. They have more than enough pitching (exclude Cain, Lincecum, Bumgarner and Alderson) and will probably move Pablo Sandoval to 3B, if not back to catcher if Molina is dealt. Young arms like Henry Sosa, Ben Snyder, Kevin Pucetas, Joseph Martinez, Clayton Tanner and Kyle Nicholson should intrigue the Brewers, not to mention the Giants may try to send over either Randy Winn or Dave Roberts as well!
Posted by: Kensf25 | October 28, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Because Teixiera is going to ... shortstop?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 28, 2008 at 03:38 PM
"the team's long-term desire to move Derek Jeter to first base after the 2010 season."
No way. Jeter will be an OF... he has no power at all to be 1B. Ever
Posted by: Jeteristheman | October 28, 2008 at 03:41 PM
How is Fielder's defense?
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | October 28, 2008 at 03:41 PM
About as good as your defense is
Posted by: derman1984 | October 28, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Jeter's upside at first at this point in his career is Mark Grace with worse defense. Somehow, I don't see how that works for a team with a 200 mil payroll.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 28, 2008 at 03:48 PM
"How is Fielder's defense?"
About as good as Ryan Howard's.
Posted by: richie | October 28, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Never really pictured Jeter at 1B... could see him pulling a robin yount and maybe taking CF - although LF maybe better. A's seem like a possibility and if they don't resign Tex I would imagine Angels would be all over this since they have the pcs to pull it off
Posted by: touchmymonkey | October 28, 2008 at 04:04 PM
fielder's defense isn't that terrible. He can actually pick it pretty well..has a little trouble digging out low throws, but his biggest problem is his range. He can make the play...if he gets there.
Posted by: JoeyT107 | October 28, 2008 at 04:06 PM
The problem is Jeter is a below average power source anywhere he plays, let alone a corner. If he can't handle the middle IF, the closest to passable "non-power" position would be CF. Does 35+ Jeter really profile well out there? I think you almost have to accept you're going OBP over power (not a terrible thing) at a traditional power position and offset it elsewhere. A healthy Posada goes a long way in that.
2008 isoP by POS:
1B: 0.193
DH: 0.178
RF: 0.175
LF: 0.173
3B: 0.170
CF: 0.151
DJ06: 0.140
C: 0.133
2B: 0.133
DJ07: 0.130
SS: 0.119
DJ08: 0.107
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 28, 2008 at 04:08 PM
The Giants look like a great fit IMO. Cain for Fielder looks pretty even to me. Young, high ceiling cost controlled pitcher for an elite hitting 1st baseman.
Fits a need on both sides, and the Giants have starting pitching to spare.
Posted by: jclay | October 28, 2008 at 04:09 PM
With the underperformance/injuries to Travis Hafner, wouldn't Fielder look great in a tribe uniform. Huff, Laffey and Barfield?
Posted by: Pronkfan789 | October 28, 2008 at 04:12 PM
AHH Fielder instead of Hafner,one can only hope.
Posted by: Pronkfan789 | October 28, 2008 at 04:18 PM
How about Fielder to the Dodgers for Loney and an arm?
Posted by: surfacetear | October 28, 2008 at 04:18 PM
"If the Yanks plan on moving Jeter, why are they mentioned in EVERY single Teixeira rumor?"
Maybe it's because the Yankees don't have a 1B, and are by far the richest team in baseball? How do you not know that?
And I also think that the Derek Jeter situation is going to start getting messy soon. Once his defense at shortstop officially becomes the worst in baseball, then the Yankees will really have no choice but to move him. But then the problem becomes where do you move him? They have to give him a spot somewhere because he's a living legend and I don't think Yankee fans could deal with Jeter being on the bench or in a different uniform. But then again Jeter would likely be an inadequate player at any position on the field, and you know his salary will still be high thanks to his reputation.
That is going to be one sticky situation.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 04:18 PM
"With the underperformance/injuries to Travis Hafner, wouldn't Fielder look great in a tribe uniform. Huff, Laffey and Barfield?"
What about LaPorta for Fielder? :)
I could see the Indians being a very good fit, although I'm not sure if the Brewers would be interested in Barfield or Laffey. Maybe something like Fielder for Garko, Huff and Weglarz?
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 04:20 PM
I somehow doubt that the Brewers would trade Fielder to the Giants unless one of Cain, Lincecum, Alderson or Bumgarner is involved. I would think that Cain is the more likely target. You gotta give quality to get quality.
Posted by: Robin | October 28, 2008 at 04:23 PM
Also probably worth noting is that he played with a wrist injury (perhaps a break according to some (who I choose to believe for obvious reasons)) this season so the isoP should atleast creep back towards .125 or so. As long as he keeps getting on base, he'll be a net positive, it will just be in an untraditional lineup (power at C or SS or something).
(If any Jeter fans want to make themselves a little sad, check out his 2008 line then Skip Schumaker's.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 28, 2008 at 04:27 PM
street
mazzaro or simmons
eveland or smith
buck or sweeney
hrod
for
fielder
3b green
mil gets a closer, a 2nd yr lefty, mlb ready sp, a flame throwing reliever, and an OF
A's dont need street
Hrod is the type of high upside melvin likes
eveland/smith, either or likely both wont be around by 2010
mazzaro outside of anderson/cahill, is the best sp in the system
brewers might prefer sweeney since he can play cf...buk has better offensive upside (if healthy)
Posted by: arly2380 | October 28, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Maybe it's because the Yankees don't have a 1B, and are by far the richest team in baseball? How do you not know that?"
If you HONESTLY think the Yanks are not going to seriously pursue Teixeira then there is nothing else for me to say.
I agree with all you said about Jeter, he will have to be moved somewhere, if for no other reason than the PR issue, but the Yanks are not going to pass up on a guy like Teixeira, when they havent won in 8 years and are moving into a new stadium just to keep a spot warm for an aging "superstar", even one named Derek Jeter.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | October 28, 2008 at 04:34 PM
oh yeah, apparently fiants are in running fr mike jacobs + they have sandoval/ishikawa if need be...if anything they'd prefer hardy or escobar or gamel at other position needs
lets say C bolts and sheets is too much of a risk to sign...mil 09 rotation:
not exactly dominating, they could sign a garland type through FA
parra
davis
suppan
gallardo
bush
villanueva
Posted by: arly2380 | October 28, 2008 at 04:35 PM
"street
mazzaro or simmons
eveland or smith
buck or sweeney
hrod
for
fielder
3b green"
This deal doesn't really make any sense for Milwaukee, though. They give up by far the best player in the deal, and none of the guys they receive really have that kind of impact potential. Street is really just a good set up man, Mazzaro is just a good pitching prospect, Eveland/Smith are nothing more than 4/5's, Buck and Sweeney have pretty low ceilings, and Rodriguez has no shot to be anything but a reliever.
If the Brewers move Fielder, I would expect the Brewers to persue higher upside guys that have the potential to be legitimate impact players, not just solid pitchers or solid hitters. Basically, the Brewers would want someone like Matt Cain..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 04:36 PM
To the Loney question, there is no way i would trade Loney, whose a way better fielder, better contact hitter and bat about .450 in the playoffs WITH a young arm for Fielder.
I would have to guess Prince will end up staying put or going to Anaheim, even though that A's trade looks tempting.
Posted by: HollywoodHitmen | October 28, 2008 at 04:37 PM
If the Giants get Fielder and don't have to give up Cain (I'm assuming Lincecum isn't even in the discussion), I can see them being a surprise team next year.
Sandoval is going to do big things.
Posted by: surfacetear | October 28, 2008 at 04:37 PM
"If you HONESTLY think the Yanks are not going to seriously pursue Teixeira then there is nothing else for me to say.
I agree with all you said about Jeter, he will have to be moved somewhere, if for no other reason than the PR issue, but the Yanks are not going to pass up on a guy like Teixeira, when they havent won in 8 years and are moving into a new stadium just to keep a spot warm for an aging "superstar", even one named Derek Jeter."
No no, I expect the Yankees to be one of the big teams in on Teixeira. I just expect the Yankees to prioritize pitching, as they should. I would expect them to throw big money at Sabathia or Burnett before Tex.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Just throwing this out there for fun:
Fielder to Boston for Bucholtz, Bowden, Crisp, & another prospect.
Moves Youk back to 3B, gives a big power bat behind Ortiz.
MIL gets two very good pitchers that they could lock up for years to come, as well as a speedy CF if Cameron doesnt re-sign.
Not saying it'll happen, but might be worth checking in on.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 28, 2008 at 04:44 PM
scribble,
of course Fielder is the best in that deal, he's established and known.
street isnt just a good setup reliever, when right top 10 type closer or just outside of that. would i trade him? only because A's are loaded in that area.
if you look at mil pitching depth its pretty bad.smith put up 190in/just over a 4 era in the AL. his walks were a concern and some hr's, but he was tough to hit overall.
mazzaro dominated AA and is an impact arm IMO and not far off maybe mid 09 at the earliest. i think its too early to judge the upside of sweeney/buck...obviously both have yet to have a full 500+ ab's in a season. well, if that ofer isnt enough A's have much more to offer...Doolittle, Carter, Cardenas, Donaldson, Gio, Gallagher, Gio, maybe even trade one of Cahill/Anderson...if A's wanted fielder and his contract, they have more than enough ammo to pull it off
Posted by: arly2380 | October 28, 2008 at 04:54 PM
"Fielder to Boston for Bucholtz, Bowden, Crisp, & another prospect."
I vomited after the word Buchholz and then again after Bowden.
If Boston is going to upgrade at 1st do it with money.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | October 28, 2008 at 04:57 PM
Fielder is the type of player i would love to see with the Jays. unfortunately i dont think the Jays have what it takes to trade for him. theyre allready weak for pitching going into next season with Marcum out for the season and McGowan coming back from surgery. the only pitching they could offer is young SP or bullpen.. unless it was a 3some, er 3 way trade.
Posted by: SpecialFNK | October 28, 2008 at 05:03 PM
A's Get: Prince Fielder
Brewers Get: Huston Street + Vin Mazzaro
I'm no trade expert, but would that get it done? Maybe add in Daric Barton?
Posted by: jpkinney7 | October 28, 2008 at 05:07 PM
Bamabosoxfan: I think thats a very fair offer (prob just one minor player away) and def. better then anything the Yanks could offer or most teams for that matter. The one flaw is what do you do with Mike Lowell? He is not really tradeable do to the injury and still owed 26 mil over the next two years so he can't be on the bench. One idea maybe add Lowell to the deal and a lesser pitcher than Bowden or Bucholtz and kick in half of Lowell's salary. I think the Brewers would have to think long an hard about one top arm, one back of the rotation arm, a cheap 3B to help replace the offense and a CF who is an upgrade over Cameron.
Posted by: Steveo26 | October 28, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Steveo26-
"...and def. better then anything the Yanks could offer..."
Really? Considering this article is about the Yankees not being interested. Way to add them into the mix.
And if everyone thinks that Phil Hughes is a bust, then what Clay Buchholz?
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | October 28, 2008 at 05:59 PM
"To the Loney question, there is no way i would trade Loney, whose a way better fielder, better contact hitter and bat about .450 in the playoffs WITH a young arm for Fielder."
Actually, Loney went just 3 for 14 [.214] in the NLDS, and 7 for 16 [.438] in the NLCS. But you're right, dudes who have good five-game stretches should never be on the trading block.
I kind of like Fielder to the A's, but they'd still be a bit too left-handed.
Posted by: scatterbrian | October 28, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Toronto could offer:
Rios +
(one of Litsch, Cecil or Romero)
for
Fielder + (maybe a lower level prospect)
- Rios is an all star (minus 1st 1/2 2008)
- Awesome CF defender
- locked up long term at a reasonable rate (Fielder is not, hence must be moved)
-this allows the Jays to go with Lind-Snider in the corners and Wells in CF
- Overbay will not be a Jay next year no matter if Fielder is @ 1B or not
Posted by: JM | October 28, 2008 at 06:17 PM
prince to Angels
for
kendrick
wood
adenhart
angels need personality as well as bat
then they can forget teixeira and take a run at sabathia
maybe LA should go for bill hall too. could play left as well as filling in for hunter CF, figgins at 3b and prince at 1b. send speier to Brews to offset some of the money.
Posted by: crash | October 28, 2008 at 06:46 PM
"Rios +
(one of Litsch, Cecil or Romero)
for
Fielder + (maybe a lower level prospect)"
This would be a good deal for the Blue Jays, but unless that pitcher is Litsch or Cecil, and the Brewers only send Fielder, that's not a great deal for Milwaukee. They need to address pitching more than anything, and even though adding Rios would save them the money they'd pay Cameron, Rios isn't exactly free, and the Brewers would have a hole at first. Maybe the Blue Jays include Overbay and throw in some cash as well.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 06:55 PM
I think that the Mariners should be considered a dark horse for Prince. With Big Z in Seattle they could work out a deal. Maybe something with Putz or Beltre with Seattle paying the salary plus some young players.
Posted by: Scott | October 28, 2008 at 07:02 PM
"not exactly dominating, they could sign a garland type through FA
parra
davis
suppan
gallardo
bush
villanueva"
Davis? Who is Davis?
Posted by: FakeDiesel | October 28, 2008 at 07:12 PM
"I think that the Mariners should be considered a dark horse for Prince. With Big Z in Seattle they could work out a deal. Maybe something with Putz or Beltre with Seattle paying the salary plus some young players."
I disagree. I think the Mariners bringing on Jack Z is a sign that they are rebuilding, and trading for Fielder would not be rebuilding. They are going to build around Felix Hernandez, Jeff Clement, Jose Lopez, Brandon Morrow, Carlos Triunfel, Michael Saunders, etc. and play for 2012, not 2009.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 28, 2008 at 07:13 PM
"How about Fielder to the Dodgers for Loney and an arm?"
Not worth it for the Dodgers. Loney has another year at near minimum, is the vastly superior fielder and projects to easily hit for a .300/.360/.500 line. His ceiling is more like .320/.380/.530 or something of the sort. Even at the lower projection, Loney's runs saved with his defense easily make up for the offensive difference, and Loney projects to be far cheaper over his baseball life than Fielder, and has a body much less conducive to breaking down.
Posted by: AA | October 28, 2008 at 07:46 PM
if fielder is traded would Mil want a 1b in the deal? or is the 1b job automatically given to gamel?
maybe A"s could include in a offer any of these...
barton still only 23, although coming off a disappointing season
doolittle: 07 pick, leads AFL in HR's. GG caliber 1b w/ advanced hitting approach
carter: similar to gamel, not much defensively, still needs a position, but a masher, pure power hitter
if anything, how about a minor deal just to pry away 3b Green in AA...A's have the pitching depth to trade
Posted by: arly2380 | October 28, 2008 at 08:03 PM
What about the Royals as a match with Brewers for Fielder?
I'm not very familiar with their farm system or MLB team for that matter but I know they are actively seeking offensive players.
Posted by: cowsarecool220 | October 28, 2008 at 09:11 PM
Angels seem like the best fit especially if Tex walks. He'd be Guerero's long term replacement as a bat (I'm aware Guerrero will probably be an Angel for a couple more years). And hey, the power has the best chance of propelling them to the top.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 28, 2008 at 09:18 PM
"Really? Considering this article is about the Yankees not being interested. Way to add them into the mix.
And if everyone thinks that Phil Hughes is a bust, then what Clay Buchholz?"
3536: As for the article being about the Yankees being interested I think you are missing the point of the post or at least the other comments. Even Tim disagreed with the authors of the article as having flawed logic. And as most commenters about the Yanks pointed out Jeter at 1st would be a horrible idea, Posada would be there long before Jeter, and the Yanks are actively pursuing Tex. A point that most people haven't mentioned is that Fielder if acquired by the yanks would prob be a 1B for all of one year, then i'd see Posada move to first and Fielder as DH.
As for your second part I didn't say Hughes was a bust I just implied his value as with all the yankees young players not named Joba. I've said before Hughes, Melky, Kennedy couldn't get Santana like it could have last year. If you offered it to the Angels for the last year of Lackey they wouldn't accept as well. Hughes has struggled/been injured for 2 years now (and continues to struggle in AFL) Bucholtz has only struggled for one year. If he struggles again or suffers an injury then is value will fall like Hughes value did. The Yankees couldn't match that Buchholtz, Bowden, Crisp trade evenly with 3 players. The Yankees don't have a player at Bowden's level (in fact Hughes may be closer to Bowden than Buchholtz) guys like Horne, Kennedy ect. are not comparable. And I believe that even at the higher price most teams would take Crisp well above Melky/Gardner.
Posted by: Steveo26 | October 28, 2008 at 09:52 PM
That Hughes stuff was just dumb. While 2008 was certainly a lost season, Hughes was strong in 2007; great in the minors, good in the majors save his initial return from the DL. If Buchholz is somehow clearly on a higher level like you seem to imply, why is he struggling as much or more than Hughes in 2008 despite being 22 months older? Shouldn't he be more advanced by now?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 28, 2008 at 10:16 PM
Fielder for Lincecum? How about Fielder, Weeks and to triple A arms for Lincecum or Fielder and Braun for Lincecum and a quality middle reliever. Lincecum is awesome!
Posted by: yanksrule | October 28, 2008 at 11:06 PM
2 not to
Posted by: yanksrule | October 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Hey bambosoxfan, fielder and ortiz in same lineup? let me get 2 big macs and a coke with that. They'll clog the bases like they like to clog their arteries.
Posted by: yanksrule | October 28, 2008 at 11:13 PM
NJM: The "Hughes stuff" isn't me talking its what baseball people are saying. Its what the scouts are telling Jim Callis and BA and what others like Keith Law are saying. Simple fact Buchholtz is above Hughes right now. Bailey fell off the wagon as well it happens. I'm not saying Hughes isn't ever gonna be good or maybe even great my point is he isn't right now and there are now question marks about his future. He could just be more of a late bloomer, Volquez struggled with Texas, Danks as well, Guthrie was put on waiviers b/c the Tribe thought he couldn't do it. The point is his value is down. I mean do u honestly think Hughes has the same value that he did before 2007??? Also I never said that Buchholtz's value was at the top of the world as it was at the beggining of 08 what I said was it is higher than Hughes. I mean even the Yankees are handling Hughes more carefully, they have 3 open spots in their rotation (and their other two are held by Wang coming off a season ending injury and Joba who also has some injury concerns) and they still can't commit a spot to this supposed ACE pitcher??? It seems like other ace pitchers like Price, Kershaw, and even Gallardo are being penciled into next year's rotation of their teams. The Sox on the other hand have 2 or 1 spot (if Wake remains a starter) available and the feeling is that Buchholtz is at least in the mix for that spot and prob only has to beat out Bowden and Masterson if they take him out of the pen. So if you want to be mad at someone NJM be mad at the Yankees for disrespecting your fav. pitcher but to get all hot and bothered about my opinion that is seemingly shared by most baseball people out there.
Posted by: Steveo26 | October 29, 2008 at 12:34 AM
"Fielder and Braun for Lincecum and a quality middle reliever."
Hell if the trade was for Sandy Koufax or Bob Gibson instead of Lincencum I STILL wouldn't do that deal. Two top power hitters for a power pitcher isn't worth it.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 29, 2008 at 01:08 AM
"Hey bambosoxfan, fielder and ortiz in same lineup? let me get 2 big macs and a coke with that. They'll clog the bases like they like to clog their arteries."
Really? Was that your pathetic excuse for a cutdown? Weak, much like the Yankee pitching staff this past season.
And Steveo26, Adding Lowell wouldn't be a bad idea. However, I'm still kinda hoping someone would bite on Lugo and get him off our hands. Lowell's bat off the bench is much more effective than Lugo. Granted Lugo can play multiple positions, so I guess your idea makes some sense too. Maybe Lowell, Bucholtz, and Crisp?
And to those Yankee fans out there whining about the comparisons of Hughes and Bucholtz, you're nuts. They really have a lot in common. Both highly touted prospects, both came to the majors with a lot of pressure on them to succeed at the highest level. BOTH fell through in '08. But you can't look at one season when talking about the upside of the player's career. Personally, I dread the day as a Sox fan when Hughes finally starts pitching the way we know he can. So all this Hughes is better than Clay BS needs to rest. They're both great pitchers, deal with it.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 29, 2008 at 09:03 AM
"NJM: The "Hughes stuff" isn't me talking its what baseball people are saying. Its what the scouts are telling Jim Callis and BA and what others like Keith Law are saying."
And Law has stated he's not a fan of Bowden at all. So on one side you're quoting Law as saying Buchholz is ahead of Hughes, on the other you're saying Hughes is closer to Bowden. You're cherrypicking certain reports then inserting your own opinion to try and make that "scouting fact" or something. I've read Law's comments that he'd prefer Buchholz at the current time, I'm fine with that. He's older and presumably more advanced. Law has never said Hughes isn't on Buchholz's level.
"Simple fact Buchholtz is above Hughes right now ..."
That's an opinion.
"... He could just be more of a late bloomer ..."
He's 22. Just turned 22 in June I believe. He's an early bloomer if anything by virtue of having success at the MLB level in 2007.
"The point is his value is down. I mean do u honestly think Hughes has the same value that he did before 2007???"
I would bet Hughes still has tremendous value. Because he's 22.
"... I mean even the Yankees are handling Hughes more carefully, they have 3 open spots in their rotation (and their other two are held by Wang coming off a season ending injury and Joba who also has some injury concerns) and they still can't commit a spot to this supposed ACE pitcher???"
He's 22. Buchholz was 23 this year and Boston had to bump him out for poor performance. He wasn't even trusted to help them out in September when rosters expanded. And really, are you not grasping the 2 year age gap here? Hughes SHOULDN'T be at the same point in his development that Buchholz is. If Hughes throws up a 6+ ERA in 2010, trust me, I'll be very, very worried.
"So if you want to be mad at someone NJM be mad at the Yankees for disrespecting your fav. pitcher but to get all hot and bothered about my opinion that is seemingly shared by most baseball people out there."
If you link an article that says Buchholz is on another level than Hughes (versus being ranked ahead) or that Hughes profiles more like Bowden, please link it. I promise my future ire will include that writer as well.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 09:21 AM
(We need quote blocks or bold type or something. That's a disaster to parse.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 09:22 AM
I'm wondering if the Brewers would trade Fielder to someone in the Central? I'd like to see the Cubs move DLee for prospects, then bundle those prospects with others already in their system for Fielder. He's cheaper than Lee and also a left-handed power bat, just what the Cubs need. Payroll and the lineup both benefit. Maybe Marshall, Pie and whatever they can get for Lee? Thoughts?
Posted by: pageian | October 29, 2008 at 09:40 AM
694 at bats for Fielder..?
Posted by: Eric Posch | October 29, 2008 at 10:33 AM
PAs, not ABs
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM
Fielder for Lincecum? How about Fielder, Weeks and to triple A arms for Lincecum or Fielder and Braun for Lincecum and a quality middle reliever. Lincecum is awesome!
Posted by: yanksrule | October 28, 2008 at 11:06 PM
The hebrew hammer will soon hit 40-50 homers even though he is already hitting 35 in his first 2 seasons. Big boy prince has already hit 50. Lincecum is a stud, but not worth two of the top bopers in the NL.
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | October 29, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Lincecum will not be trade anytime. so stop with all that
Posted by: derman1984 | October 29, 2008 at 01:28 PM
"I'm wondering if the Brewers would trade Fielder to someone in the Central? I'd like to see the Cubs move DLee for prospects, then bundle those prospects with others already in their system for Fielder."
If Vitters is in the package, the Brewers should consider. But, it is intradivision, and thus the Brewers should without a doubt hold out for Vitters.
"The hebrew hammer will soon hit 40-50 homers even though he is already hitting 35 in his first 2 seasons. Big boy prince has already hit 50. Lincecum is a stud, but not worth two of the top bopers in the NL."
Lincecum for Braun straight up is fair.
Fielder, Weeks, and two AAA arms for Lincecum is a Brian Sabean move if there ever was one.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 29, 2008 at 06:52 PM
Fielder and Braun for Lincecum. Oh my.
Giants would actually do that, IMO.
Thin Tim is a stud but I still get a strange vibe from the Giants front office that they're worried he'll remain healthy. Of course they've been so Jekyll and Hyde with "The Franchise" this past year that it's anybody's guess. First they limited his pitch count and babied him to the point that fans rebelled (when he lost a number of games due to poor bullpen efforts late). Then the pendulum swung horribly the other way and Lincecum had a number of outings in August/Sept with more than 125 pitches (even 130+ wasn't so rare).
Hard to imagine the Gmen dealing Tim. But with Baumgarner, Alderson coming and Cain/Sanchez already proving it in the Bigs, well, two perennial All-Star bats would be an intriguing package ABSOLUTELY.
Posted by: YeagerFan | October 30, 2008 at 04:26 AM
PS. Weeks has little trade value even for a knucklehead like Sabean. I think Weeks is very close to an offical "failed prospect" label at this point. He's more a throw in than a central character in any deal this offseason. When in a pennant race the likes of Ray Durham beats you out, well, you're not good!
Posted by: YeagerFan | October 30, 2008 at 04:28 AM
For the yankees
sign:
Mark Teixeira
R.Baldelli
A.J. Burnett or C.C Sabathia
Resign:
Mussina
Abrue
Trade:
Matsui and S.Duncan/K. Igawa
for
Jarrod Washburn
SP2009:
Wang
Burnett or C.C
Joba Chamberlain
Jarrod Washburn
Mike Mussina
LINEUP2009:
Damon-DH
Jeter-SS
TEIXEIRA-1B
A-ROD-3B
ABRUE-RF
NADY-LF
POSADA-C
R.Baldelli/CABRERA/Gardner-CF
Cano-2B
Posted by: addymaster04 | October 31, 2008 at 06:20 PM
I personally would like to see the Brewers trade Prince before his Production goes even lower and his bodyweight goes higher.
Posted by: bum76 | November 02, 2008 at 11:26 PM