![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Closer Situation | Main | Elias Rankings - AL Relievers »
A nugget from Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune:
Kevin Towers said he has heard from clubs interested in trading for ace pitcher Jake Peavy. "We're having talks," he said. The GM said he wouldn't be surprised if the Peavy talks heat up next month.
MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan wrote today that Peavy said he will only waive his no-trade clause for a National League team. However, Peavy's agent Barry Axelrod said Friday that three teams in the American League could entice his client. The Yankees could be one; we discussed the possibility here. A possible Peavy trade will be one of the biggest stories at the Winter Meetings in December.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105357ce735970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Peavy Trade Talks Begin:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
lets go cubs put in all the chips to get this guy.
cubs get: jake peavy
padres get: ryan theriot, felix pie, jason marquis, rich hill, tyler colvin.
theriot had 178 hits, and thats what they need infront of adrian. felix pie in my eyes is the next alfonso soriano, and rich hill had 189 K's 2 years ago.
what do yall think??
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Peavy cant pitch in the AL East.
Posted by: solard | October 13, 2008 at 01:54 PM
Felix Pie the next Soriano???? The same guy who has had like 5 chances, and can't stay in the big leagues?? Don't be ridiculous
Posted by: metzfan22 | October 13, 2008 at 01:55 PM
Nobody wants Marquis or Theriot, Hill is a question mark, Pie and Colvin have some value. You're going to have to do much better than that.
Posted by: Land-Man | October 13, 2008 at 01:56 PM
If the Yanks really do have a shot, this is the time.
The Yankees should be prepared to give a Hughes-based package.
The rotation MIGHT then look like
Peavy (RHP)
Sabathia (LHP)
Wang (RHP)
Pettitte (LHP)
Chamberlain (RHP)
Opposing lineups would have to make a daily adjustment.
Posted by: nyankees | October 13, 2008 at 01:57 PM
I would imagine that, for Peavy to come to the Cubs, it would take Theriot, Pie, Cerda, Hill and Colvin.
This would replenish some of the farm/major league team and gives them the room to move Greene to a team that needs a short.
Pie has room to roam, not nearly as much pressure and could use that speed to leg out double to triples.
Hill can get that ERA to the mid 3's by pitching in that park if his curveball is as dominating.
I think the only the padres take Marquis is if the Cubs pay all of it.
Posted by: NoamOnMyChomsky | October 13, 2008 at 01:58 PM
theriot batted .309 with 22 stolen bases and had the most multihitting performances in the NL besides jose reyes. felix pie has been up and down b/c we have 3 center fielders, he can potentially steal over 50-75 bases a year, hes 23 years old and has the best arm and glove in the minors for a OF. marquiz can eat up innings next year for the padres as the rebuild so they dont kill there young arms
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 02:00 PM
peavy will veto anything to the east cause he knows that means less wins and higher ERA and his free agent money contract will go down.
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 02:03 PM
I don't know if the Reds have enough in the farm to get Peavy, but I would start with Homer Bailey, Micah Owings, Chris Valaika, and Drew Stubbs. This would give the Pads two young fringe starters, a young SS, and a young speedy OF who are all almost ready if not there already. Would that be enough?
A rotation of Peavy, Harang, Volquez, Cueto, and Arroyo will win a bunch of games.
Posted by: carolina03 | October 13, 2008 at 02:04 PM
"Marquiz can eat up innings next year for the padres as the rebuild so they dont kill there young arms."
Yeah, assuming he can actually make it through a season without getting hurt. 167 innings won't do it.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 13, 2008 at 02:05 PM
I'd personally love to see Peavy pitching in Boston. However, I don't know if Boston is willing to part with what it would take to get him. Tito is still pretty high on Clay Buchholtz so I doubt he's going anywhere.
Then again, Theo's surprised us before (see Nomar trade).
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 13, 2008 at 02:08 PM
It would take a package involving any two of Buchholtz, Masterson, and Lowrie, plus some extra. Boston won't pull the trigger on something like that.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 13, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Theriot, Pie, Ceda, Veal, Vitters may get it done. I dont think we really need Peavy though.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 13, 2008 at 02:09 PM
marquis was are 5th start who we would skip if there was an off day so we could keep dempster and lilly and zabrano always on 5 days of rest, marquis has never been on the DL since hes been on the cubs nor when he was with the cardinals, he had 167 innings and 28 starts, the last 10 days of the year he was in the bullpen getting ready for the playoffs, so thats 2 starts and was skipped for are top pitchers.
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 02:10 PM
You guys forget the one team poised to make this trade more then anyone would be the Braves. They are loaded in the farm system and are in desperate need for an ACE. I personally hope they dont unload the farm system for him but there is no doubt they will be in it until the end.
Posted by: MadBravesFan | October 13, 2008 at 02:13 PM
I would love to see Peavy suit up in a Rays uniform. I would deal Edwin Jackson, a top pitching prospect and another lower tier prospect for Peavy. Do you think that would be enough. I would love to see a Peavy, Shields, Kazmir, Garza, and Price rotation. I think the Rays are too stingy with prospects to pull the trigger (see rumored Jason Bay deal) but if there is one player worth unloading prospects for its Peavy.
Posted by: nIcKyP | October 13, 2008 at 02:14 PM
J. Peavy to yanks 09
z
Posted by: arod13 | October 13, 2008 at 02:15 PM
So why would the padres want a $7m a year 5th starter? If anything, he would have negative value for the small market padres.
Look for Peavy, if he's even moved, to net at least two top 25 prospects and then some.
Posted by: LetsGoOs | October 13, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Peavey in the trade market would net what the A's got when they traded Haren to the Diamondbacks.
For the Cubs they would have to give up Vitters, Hill, Pie, Theriot, and Marshall.
I wonder if the Brewers would be willing to trade away Cain, Jeffress, and Hardy for Peavey.
I don't believe the Brewers will trade away Jeffress though.
Posted by: Nate crew | October 13, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Melky and Kennedy for Peavy!
(We might need Gonzalez too to balance the trade. Throw in Shelley if they want a 1B back. He hits some HRs sometimes!)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 13, 2008 at 02:21 PM
Peavy is under control for 5 more years at the not so bargain basement prices of:
2009: $8 million club option w/$500,000 buyout
2010: $15 million
2011: $16 million
2012: $17 million
2013: $22 million club option w/$4 million buyout
Because he is owed a lot of money, he’d be more likely to go to a big market team like the Yanks, Red Sox or Cubs, though a team with a deep system and money to burn could snag him in a close to Haren type deal.
I don't think the Cubs have enough in their system to get Peavy, but any deal would probably start with Josh Vitters and a few guys closer to or in the majors.
The Yanks have the juice if they're willing to work on a deal that starts with Hughes and includes another top prospect like Jackson or Montero plus some filler. That could very well get the job done.
If he only wants to go to an NL team, and eliminating each team in the NL West, I'd guess that the Cubs, Mets, Brewers and maybe the Cardinals, Reds and Houston would be the most interested and able to get a deal done.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 13, 2008 at 02:23 PM
"Yeah, assuming he can actually make it through a season without getting hurt. 167 innings won't do it."
This is a really dumb statement when referring to Marquis, whom I'm not sure has been hurt in half a decade.
"padres get: ryan theriot, felix pie, jason marquis, rich hill, tyler colvin."
This is bad too...
The Cubs just make no sense at all frankly, and I don't think they have the top tier prospects, other than Vitters, to make it happen. I have to admit though, I would love to see Pie's range in that outfield though. But, right now, to say he is the next Soriano is bad...
If you hear pitching, you HAVE to think the Yanks will go all in.
Peavy, Sabathia, Wang, Hughes, and Joba????? Just the fact that it has a 1% chance of happening is pretty sick to think about...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 13, 2008 at 02:27 PM
As a Padre fan, the Braves are the team I'm hoping pony up some prospects for Jake.
It'd also be ideal if the Padres could find a trade partner willing to take on Khalil's contract as well.
With the Padres clearly cash-strapped, they might be willing to sacrifice a little in talent to rid themselves of the $7MM Khalil's owed next year.
Jake Peavy & Khalil Greene
for
Jordan Schafer, Yunel Escobar, Cole Rohrbough & Gorkys Hernandez
That's 3 top prospects and one major league ready talent. Giving up Schafer AND Hernandez would hurt, but the Braves would still have Heyward & Jones, not to mention an ace for the next five years in Jake Peavy.
With Khalil, they're paying the extra salary for a top defensive SS who needs to get out of Petco to show off his offense. And if they don't re-sign him after next year, they get some draft picks to help refill the farm system.
Without Khalil, a lower level prospect is needed, in my opinion.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | October 13, 2008 at 02:28 PM
I can actually see the Cardinals getting involved, with Rasmus and Anderson going to the Pads. How could that not entice both teams???
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 13, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Let's get this straight, people.
Peavy will cost at least two TOP prospects. One will probably be erring on the side of elite.
Think Haren deal. That's what Peavy will net the Padres.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 13, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Actually, on 2nd thought, the Mets system is in worse shape than the Cubs, so they probably don't have the juice to get Peavy, though they do have the money to afford him.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 13, 2008 at 02:29 PM
I don't understand why you think your extraneous garbage will net you one of the premier pitchers in the game. I'm looking at Yankees and Cubs fans in particular. Don't think you'll be getting a discount because you picked up some idea that he won't be able to pitch as well in x division. If this actually happens, Kevin Towers will be sure to make this an absolute blockbuster deal. Melky Cabrera won't do it. Robinson Cano won't do it. Ian Kennedy probably won't do it. Jason Marquis? Ryan Theriot? You've got to be kidding. Quantity doesn't equate to quality.
Posted by: helloelan | October 13, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Let's trade xx1, xx2, xx3, and xx for a proven ace pitcher. To everyone else, they're scraps but to us, they're gonna be golden.
xx1 will be a dominant pitcher, xx2 will swipe a billion bags and has a cannon for an arm, and xx3 will mash 80 homers in a couple of seasons.
Posted by: k0o56 | October 13, 2008 at 02:30 PM
"theriot batted .309 with 22 stolen bases and had the most multihitting performances in the NL besides jose reyes. felix pie has been up and down b/c we have 3 center fielders, he can potentially steal over 50-75 bases a year, hes 23 years old and has the best arm and glove in the minors for a OF. marquiz can eat up innings next year for the padres as the rebuild so they dont kill there young arms"
Theriot does not have that much trade value. Comparing him to Jose Reyes is insane. Felix Pie is NOT the best defensive OF in the minors...there are players such as Colby Rasmus, Jordan Schafer, Andrew McCutchen, and Cameron Maybin who would beg to differ. And Marquis is not an upgrade for any team. He is an over paid #5 starter.
Posted by: mtzxc | October 13, 2008 at 02:31 PM
You know, until today I never thought Cubs fans were crazy but you have all changed my mind. Felix Pie is nothing until he shows something on the big league level. If you are trading away Jake Peavy you need a big league hitter. Jason Marquis has negative value: Bad contract+ bad pitcher= bad money. Rich Hill could regain his form in San Diego, I agree with that-but why sell low? Your pitching staff is fine how it is. I would love for my Red Sox to get Peavy too, but our staff is good and any deal that San Diego would accept, we probably shouldn't do. I would imagine a Buckholz, Lowerie/Ellsbury, Bowden type deal. No thanks.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Easy people...some Cubs fans are bad...but not all of em'.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 13, 2008 at 02:37 PM
The Cubs need to focus on a good left handed bat.
Nothing against Peavy.
Posted by: studio179 | October 13, 2008 at 02:37 PM
cubs get: jake peavy
padres get: josh vitters (top 10 prospect), righ hill (can strike a hell of a lot of batters and expesially in that ball park,tyler colvin, felix pie, and your chioce between sean marshall / rran theriot / andrew cashner.
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Most of the trade proposals are laughable. It's five years of Peavy. He's not going to be traded just because someone empties the junk drawer. He's not going to come cheap just because the Twins screwed up with Santana.
He's not cheap starting in 2010, but he's about 60M cheaper than Santana and probably at least 30M cheaper than Sabathia.
The Padres don't need 3b or 1b prospects. They'll be looking for pitching and up-the-middle impact players.
Like several people wrote, the Braves make the most sense. It might not cost them as much to buy out his no-trade clause and they have the young pitching the Padres need.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 02:40 PM
cubs get: jake peavy
padres get: josh vitters (top 10 prospect), righ hill (can strike a hell of a lot of batters and expesially in that ball park,tyler colvin, felix pie, and your chioce between sean marshall / rran theriot / andrew cashner.
No! The Padres dont want Rich Hill, Felix Pie, Theriot, Sean Marshall, or Marquis. Stay away from Peavy and get a lefty bat! (good call studio). Would have been nice to have 1 or 2 against all those Dodger righties huh?
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 02:44 PM
I REALY dont want to see the Cubs think about trading Theriot, UNLESS the Cubs try to get Furcal
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Rich Hill lost a lot of value this season after being demoted all the way down to the AZL because he couldn't find the plate. It's doubtful the Padres would take him for Peavy as anything more than a throw-in or ancillary part of a deal.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 13, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Does anybody even know 100% that the Cubs are in the trade talks? any proof?
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 02:45 PM
You think the Padres would do Lugo, Crisp, Varitek, and Timlin for Peavy? Seriously people.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 02:46 PM
I don't think there is any proof the Cubs would be involved at all. This is some of the fans being spoiled because of the last couple of offseasons...but believe it or not, there are good players that the Cubs just cannot be in talks about because it doesn't make any sense.
nostocksjustbonds is also exactly right about Rich Hill's value. He has next to none unless he works his way back, which will be very hard with Lou as the manager.
I would think Pie would be intriguing to the Pads, but other than he and Vitters, I don't think the Cubs have the top prospects to make it work...nor do I think it makes any sense even if they did.
By the way, I still think a package from the Cards involving Rasmus and Anderson could be almost perfect.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 13, 2008 at 02:51 PM
Aduncaroo
Don't see the Padres having much interest in Anderson; not a bad player at all, but they've got quite a few flawed catching prospects already. They seem to have changed their minds a bit on catchers who can hit some but struggle to throw runners out.
Rasmus, definitely. I expect they'd target Rasmus and Perez as the main parts of a deal.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 02:52 PM
The Brewers also match up well like the Braves. I could see the Brewers trading away Parra, Hardy, and Lucroy maybe adding Gindl to the list also but that is getting close to overpaying for Peavy. This would be better than the deal you could get from the Braves.
I don't see the Braves trading away Escobar though. Maybe the Yankees will package away Hughes, Jackson, and another prospect for Peavy.
I'm just not sold on the Braves giving up Escobar to anyone even if it is for Peavy.
Posted by: Nate crew | October 13, 2008 at 02:53 PM
The Brewers have the prospects, but I think if they called and didn't start the conversation with the words 'Gamel' or 'Escobar', there would be a dial tone pretty quickly.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 02:57 PM
"You think the Padres would do Lugo, Crisp, Varitek, and Timlin for Peavy?"
I'd want Adrian Gonzalez with that deal...
Seriously though, does anyone know what the Pads actually want? If they want prospects and don't care how far they're off they might as well start a fire sale and get rid of Gonzalez and Kouz. Or are they looking for young, major league ready, 5 to 6 years of control players.
If they want the later, I'd bet they'd want a SS to replace Greene, a closer of the future, and a couple of starters. Any Pads fans want to weigh in on what they'd want back.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 13, 2008 at 03:00 PM
braves get peavy, meredith
padres get schafer, hanson, and prado
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:02 PM
The Brewers would have to deal Matt Gamel for sure. Brewers would have to send for Peavey:
Matt Gamel 3B/OF
Jermey Jerffers SP
Angel Salmone C
Tyler Green 3B
I dont think Escobar would need to be included as Gamel is the bigger prospect.
Posted by: Lidocaine | October 13, 2008 at 03:03 PM
"The Brewers have the prospects, but I think if they called and didn't start the conversation with the words 'Gamel' or 'Escobar', there would be a dial tone pretty quickly."
Depends what the Padres are looking for really. If Hardy is involved the Padres are getting a top 10 offensive SS in MLB.
In the deal I proposed they are getting a top 10 MLB offensive SS, the Brewers best catching prospect (Salome isn't a good defensive catcher), a LHP starter who is ready to go 200 IP and is young, and a low A OF prospect. That is getting close to a deal that brought Haren to the Diamonbacks.
Jeffress could be switched with Parra but I don't believe the Brewers are interested in trading away Jeffress who is really their only pitching prospect in their organization.
Posted by: Nate crew | October 13, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Frank Wren should dangle Corky Miller and Royce Ring out there, see if Towers will bite.
Posted by: Land-Man | October 13, 2008 at 03:06 PM
'braves get peavy, meredith
padres get schafer, hanson, and prado'
Are you insane!? You must be a Braves fan. I will say it again people- Jake Peavy will take your teams best 2/3 prospects- a pitcher and hitter plus more. If you dont have that, you probably wont get him. To throw Meredith in there is crazy. Hughes and some other prospect wont work either. People think just because they like some prospects they are worth Cy Young award winners.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:06 PM
west coast bias, are you out of your mind?? Escobar and three big prospects for Jake? As a Braves fan I would love to have Peavy, but not for anything near that price. Escobar is definitely not going anywhere. I have a feeling the Braves get this deal done for two big prospects and one second tier player. However, I doubt Heyward is in any deal.
Posted by: njbraves | October 13, 2008 at 03:06 PM
I know I have posed on this subject already, but I figure I will take another crack at it.
Notjoemorgan, you are insane. Melky and Kennedy doesn't net Peavy...at all. That isn't even a good starting point for negotiations.
As a Braves fan, I have already mentioned that Peavy's elbow may explode before his contract ends, so I am not a fan of making a trade.
That said, I am pretty sure the Braves are one of the teams that has inquired as to Peavy's status, and I am sure that the Pads will ask for something along the lines of the Haren deal, as they should.
WestCoastbiased, there is no way that the Braves trade Shafer and G. Hernandez. One or the other I can see. By the way, there is no way in hell the Braves are taking on Greene's contract without a downgrade on the asking price of Peavy. Furthermore, Yunel will not be traded. I can pretty much guarantee that.
All said, I can see a package of Kelly Johnson, Morten, Rohrbough, and Schafer/Hernandez. Maybe a little more, but not much.
I would also like to assert that I would not at all be in favor of such a trade.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:07 PM
"Peavy is under control for 5 more years at the not so bargain basement prices of:
2009: $8 million club option w/$500,000 buyout
2010: $15 million
2011: $16 million
2012: $17 million
2013: $22 million club option w/$4 million buyout"
Are you nuts? this is an absolute bargain price for a true ace. the only reason that johan was dealt to the mets was because they were one of 4 teams that could afford him considering that he was demanding a extention before he would approve his no trade clause. peavy could he dealt to a team like the rangers or a club of that caliber because is affordable.your only paying him 14-17 million a year. that is very affordable for a team that is on verge of a post season berth. if he were to hit the open market he would get an extention similiar to johan.
the pads are going to get more than what the twins got for johan just because of his contract siutation. you have more years with him and the pads dont have to move him.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 13, 2008 at 03:07 PM
J.J. Hardy, Parra/Jeffers, a another good prospect, and a level a prospect is a not bad deal but would you really do that?
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:09 PM
i wish the reds would call about peavy i dont know what it would take but id let the padres pick from a group of
juan francisco
todd frazier
chris valaika
josh roenicke
homer bailey
ramon ramierez
n. soto
brandon waring
zack stewart
kyle lotzkar
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 03:10 PM
I would like the Rangers as a fit but I cant see San Diego not asking for a very good pitcher in return. Teagarden, Davis, and a pitcher would probably do it, but do the Rangers have any young good pitching?
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Lidocaine:
The Padres are loaded with 3b / corner players. Gamel could be a LF, but there's no need for Green. Solid proposal, though. Salome's got those defensive questions, but when you kick the crap out of the Southern League, those questions aren't as important.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 03:12 PM
braves get peavy
padres get schaffer, hanson, jojo, prado
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:12 PM
By the way, the list of "untouchable" prospects on the Braves includes Heyward, Hanson, and Flowers from what I recall. I am pretty sure the untouchable badge really means untouchable in this case.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:14 PM
"but do the Rangers have any young good pitching?"
Most of them are at least a season off, but they have a nice stock pile.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 13, 2008 at 03:15 PM
ChiTownCubbies, you're high dude. And as a Cubs fan it makes me sad to see all your wackadoo posts right up there at the top.
Slow down and think it through, why are you so willing to give up Theriot, Pie, Hill, Marquis, Tyler Colvin etc...
The answer is because Jake Peavy is an absolute stud and none of the guys we'd be giving up is even very good. You can make cases for everyone of those players having some positive feature that might entice the Padres in one way or another, but not for Jake Peavy.
At the very least if the Cubs were to get in on the bidding they'd have to include Vitters and also take Greene's salary. The Padres won't have any interest in Marquis either, if they don't want to pay Jake Peavy $8 million next year they're not going to pay Marquis $9 million (or whatever he's getting next year on his backloaded contract). I just simply don't see any way the Cubs can make a serious offer without completely blowing their budget and gutting their already thin farm system. Any number of teams could outbid the Cubs simply with a couple high end prospects that Chicago can't match.
Posted by: pageian | October 13, 2008 at 03:16 PM
I would think any deal with the Braves would/should probably include Jurjens.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:16 PM
Instead of Tyler Green, they will throw in Rickie Weeks and/or Tony Gwynn Jr.
Posted by: Lidocaine | October 13, 2008 at 03:17 PM
no chance
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Lol nice Lidocaine. How about Todd Van Poppel, Brien Taylor, Kevin Mass, and Pat Kelly?
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:19 PM
FYI: Peavy's injury history:
5/20/2008 Strained right elbow 15 day DL (5/15/2008 - 6/12/2008)
10/4/2005 Broken left rib day-to-day
5/27/2004 Strained tendon, right forearm 15 day DL (5/20/2004 - 7/2/2004)
That's two injuries to his pitching arm that are somewhat alarming.
Another note:
Peavy's Home/Road ERA splits this year are 1.75/4.28. Just food for thought...
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:19 PM
HypnoToad (great reference to one of my favorite shows by the way)-
No way in Hell on Jurrjens. The Braves organization and fans sweat Jurrjens, he is not going anywhere.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:21 PM
What about?
Peavy to the Rays for Reid Brignac(can replace Greene @ SS), Wade Davis(Rays 2nd best pitching prospect behind Price), and the re-establish (value will never be higher than it is right now) Edwin Jackson. 2 "Elite" prospects and 1 young major league proven starter in exchange for 3 years of a prime ace. I know it's less quantity-wise than the Haren deal, but it's better in quality.
Posted by: aj7380 | October 13, 2008 at 03:21 PM
I think 1 more guy in that Rays deal and its not bad. Jurrjens is very good but I think its going to take that type of pitching prospect to net Peavy.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 13, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Hypno,
Jurrjens isn't a prospect...he is a proven starter who could be a future ace. I understand that the Pads will likely ask, but they won't get anywhere in the asking.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Jake Peavy, Kevin Kouzmanoff, and Khalil Greene for ARod.
Move Headley to Third, Luis Rodriguez at SS, Edgar Gonzalez at Second, and Hairston in Left.
But seriously, if the Padres dump Peavy.... That is like the Yanks dumping Jeter. Peavy is a foundation, not cannon fodder.
Posted by: JohnnyKozak | October 13, 2008 at 03:29 PM
It's not 3 years of an ace. It's 5 years. Peavy's signed through 2013.
Agree with HypnoToad. If it doesn't hurt to acquire Peavy, you're not giving up enough. Maybe the Braves don't trade Jurrjens or Hanson, but the Padres don't have to move Peavy. They especially don't have to move him this year, before his contract really escalates. Unless the owner's divorce changes everything, of course.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 03:29 PM
I never said that the Padre's shouldn't ask for the sun and the moon for Peavy. No question they should. However, a smart GM won't give up the shark for a pitcher with elbow problems before the age of 30 whose numbers seem to have been boosted by Petco.
As I have said, I am not in favor of the Braves acquiring Peavy. I posted what I consider to be a typical offer, and if you are wondering, yes, this would hurt.
Kelly Johnson, Morten/Reyes, Rohrbough, and Schafer/Hernandez
Perhaps more or less, but around that level would be expected.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Peavy won the frickin' triple crown for pitching in 2007 (leader in wins, K's, ERA). And before I get the "but he pitches in Petco" comments, he was actually better on the road that season. And he'll be just 28 years old next season and under contract at a good price for the next few years. Any trade including Peavy would have to bring back some big-time talent.
I'll take a stab at what it would take to get this done with a team like Atlanta, who would make sense because it's close to Peavy's hometown and because they do have some interesting prospects.
Packaging Khalil Greene, as suggested in an earlier post, doesn't seem too farfetched. It would allow the Braves to trade Yunel Escobar to SD (Pads love high OBP guys who don't stike out often so I'm sure he'd be a prime target) and if Greene left as a FA after '09, Lillibridge would be ready to step in for the Braves in '10.
With that said, I would trade a package of Peavy, Greene, and maybe a 2nd-tier prospect for Yunel Escobar, Jordan Schafer, Tommy Hanson, a major-league ready mid-rotation starter (Chuck James?), and one or two lower level prospects with high ceilings.
Maybe it seems like too much for some people but I'm guessing that is the kind of package Kevin Towers would be looking for if he does pull the trigger.
Posted by: sdpadrefan.com | October 13, 2008 at 03:36 PM
i'm so glad i found a braves fan who doesn't overrate our prospects if you look at the braves top 10 prospects each year since 2004 only one has made it to the great level and that is mccann
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:37 PM
SD,
Peavy's Career ERA on the road is a 3.80, about 1pt higher than at Petco. Not that a 3.80 is bad, but it isn't the 2.70 total era he seems to post every year. And he has a history of elbow problems. And his mechanics are on the violent end which often leads to elbow problems.
He is a great pitcher, never said otherwise. But if you think the Braves are going to trade a great shortstop and their #1 pitching prospect, plus Schafer, and another pitcher for Peavy and an albatross contract, you are mistaken. Should they ask, sure, but I am saying that realistically I don't see that happening.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Hypno and ThePadreWay,
Jurrjens ain't going anywhere because the Braves aren't going to move their #1 starter (even for Peavy) because they would have to fill Jurrjens' slot in the rotation. They'd still need another top of rotation guy for 2009 and beyond.
That said, they'll probably have to include Hanson or Morton. Towers will insist on a potential #1/#2 for Peavy, even if it's 2010 before the pitcher he gets in the trade is ready to lead a rotation. I could see Morton, KJ and another prospect or two or Hanson, Schafer and another couple of low-level prospects. (Not Heyward, Freeman or Gorkys, however.)
I'm not wild about either deal but I could see them happening.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | October 13, 2008 at 03:41 PM
I don't know if they can stack up with other teams' offers without overpaying, but the Cardinals should be in the thick of this. What kind of package could they put together?
- Obviously Rasmus is the starting point.
- Adunc brought up Perez but I remember reading that Mo said his most sought after prospect at the deadline.
- Their next best offensive prospect is Bryan Anderson, who has more upside at catcher than Nick Hundley, but is it enough of an upgrade to warrant significant interest?
- Jess Todd, Clayton Mortensen, and Mitch Boggs are not top-level pitchers, but as 4th and 5th pieces they could compare in value to the likes of Greg Smith/Dana Eveland types. Let's say Todd and Boggs complete the package.
OF Colby Rasmus
RHRP Jason Motte
C Bryan Anderson
RHP Jess Todd
RHP Mitch Boggs
OF Joe Mather for good measure.
Posted by: mateodh | October 13, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Sorry, that second point should read "Adunc brought up Perez but I remember reading that Mo said his most sought after prospect at the deadline was flamethrower Jason Motte."
Posted by: mateodh | October 13, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Umm... I don't know where the whole "I only want to play in the NL" thing came from. If the Yanks are on Peavy's list, it's probably not going to happen anyway because Cashman wouldn't want to part with the talent it would take to get him. He's probably gonna end up with the Cubs or Braves. Mostly because Cashman would rather get Sabathia with only money and draft picks than trade a lot of minor leaguers.
Posted by: Gamevice | October 13, 2008 at 03:44 PM
A.B.F., that is a solid proposal. It would be more appealing if Rohrbough was further along, but as a Padre fan I thank you for not thinking Omar Infante and Matt Diaz could be big parts of the deal. :)
Not sure if Johnson would be of much interest. If you trade Peavy you're basically giving up on the next two seasons, even in the weak NL West. Not much point in acquiring a placeholder as a big part of a deal. Lillibridge, even after a down year, might be a better fit.
Peavy's splits have only been pronounced in 2008. Several times since Petco opened he's been better away.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 03:45 PM
I think that ink-stained-scribe and I are on the same page.
And by the way, we didn't rank the Braves prospects highly, places like BP, etc. did.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:46 PM
thats what i mean the top 10 prospects came from those places
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:50 PM
I don't see the Rays getting involved in this, as I see them needing a bat more than a starter. I think Adam Dunn would fit the Rays if they were willing to pay that much which I highly doubt, and also because their lineup is already too left-handed oriented. Perhaps Pat Burrell, again depending on their willingness (or seeming lackthereof) to spend money.
Also, I don't see Brignac as an "elite" prospect. He has a chance to be a good ML SS, and that does not constitute elite when you are already at the AAA level.
I think the Rays ending up staying the course with their current plan of continuing to infuse youth.
Posted by: drchstrpunk | October 13, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Padre way,
interesting that you like Lillibridge, he could almost definitely be moved. I understand the sentiment that Rohrbough is pretty far away. And no, I think Braves fans for the most part, unlike some other fans whom I won't name, understand that Peavy will have to be acquired with value as he is a valuable player.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 03:52 PM
i think he will take as much or more than what the orioles got for bedard or what the diamondbacks gave up for haren
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 03:53 PM
The Braves untouchables per Frank Wren include (but are not limited to:
Heyward
Hanson
Freeman
Schafer
That being said, I could see maybe an offer in the range of:
Kelly/Prado (I know that's a big difference)
Morton/Reyes
Gorkys
Flowers/Cody Johnson
Marek/Ortegano/Heath
Medlen/Locke/Rohrbough
I'm not saying the Padres would take it, but it's not a terrible deal. ML ready 2B, ML ready mid-rotation SP, 5-tool CF, projectable power hitter, solid MiLB RP, and high ceiling SP
I really think the Braves are serious about not trading away their top tier.
Oh, and Jurrjens will NOT be included in a deal. The Braves are building the future rotation around him.
Posted by: SunKing1056 | October 13, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Jurrjens is probably out of the equation completely. He is under control for at least the next 4 years (anyone know exactly?) and makes next to nothing. And yes I realize his salary will go up due to arbitration but it will be nothing approaching what Peavy makes. There would be no reason for the Braves to trade their best starter in that type of contract situation for Peavy.
Are the Padres fans aware that Schafer was the Braves #1 B.A. prospect this year and Hanson will likely be a top 25 prospect for 2009? I'm hearing trades that include both of these players + MLB proven talent like KJ or Escobar. Seems like expectations for a Peavy exchange are somewhat out of line and unrealistic...
Posted by: dyaf96 | October 13, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Oh and maybe Jones/Lillibridge in there somewhere
Posted by: SunKing1056 | October 13, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Let me make this clear to all that doesn't realize that two of Hernandez/Schafer/Hanson is a bit too steep if you ask me. Peavy is certainly a top of the rotation starter, however in my mind, he also brings that injury risk much like Harden did coming to Chicago. So with that in mind, I think a top prospect along with two second-tier prospects and one major league ready player would get the deal done.
So here's my offer:
Padres get: OF Gorkys Hernandez, OF Brandon Jones, P Charlie Morton and SS Brent Lillibridge
Braves get: SP Jake Peavy
That imo is enough to acquire Peavy, especially since the Padres would be getting a ton of salary relief. And again Peavy's value is not as high as could be since he had an injury riddle year during '08.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | October 13, 2008 at 03:59 PM
Andy Braves Fan,
Agreed. The Braves would move Lillibridge in a deal for Peavy.
I'm guessing the Braves would have considered Hanson untouchable before Hudson went down. The Braves don't want to write off 2009, so they'd think about dealing Hanson if they could get a veteran stud in return.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | October 13, 2008 at 03:59 PM
There's no way Jurrjens is traded for Peavy. Not after he's proven himself at the ML level. A year ago I could've seen them spinning him off to San Diego if Peavy had been on the block...but not now. Don't get me wrong, Peavy is by far the superior pitcher, but it's not happening.
The impression I've gotten is the Braves "untouchables" are as follows. Listed in order of how "untoouchable" they really are imho.
1. Jason Heyward
2. Julio Teheran
3. Tommy Hanson
4. Freddie Freeman
5a. Jordan Schafer
5b. Gorkys Hernandez
If the Braves want Peavy they're going to have to do 1 of 3 things:
A.Trade 2 of the above players plus 2-3 lowel level, but solid prospects. These players would depend on who the top prospects are.
B. Trade one of the above players, an inexpensive+productive ML player (Yunel/KJ come to mind) plus 2-3 lower level, but solid prospects. These players would depend on who the top prospect is.
C. Trade a bundle (between 7 & 9) of the organizations 2nd tier prospects. Lower level guys who rate in the "B" range but project to move higher. In other words, if the top guys are truly out of play, it's going to take close to half of Atlanta's remaining top 20 prospects. This would only work if Peavy holds them hostage with the no-trade or the Pads want to pull a Haren-type deal and spread the risk over a larger group of prospects.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Bravesfan89,
That deal would hurt. I'd rather lose Schafer than Gorkys, and I think Schafer could rock.
But I might well do it.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | October 13, 2008 at 04:02 PM
^ But Gorkys right now holds more value than Schafer does, mostly due to his suspension at the beginning of the season. And really that is not a ton imo that we're giving up. But Peavy's value is down from a year ago and he still carries that injury risk.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | October 13, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I think there's more chance Gorkys gets moved than Schafer. He may have a higher ceiling, but we have a hole in centre field now and Schafer is the further advanced and will probably be there by May.
Likewise, I can see Rohrbough involved because he's a highly projectable arm and who doesn't love them?
I'd love Lillibridge to be involved, mainly because I don't rate him that highly at all. I can see he has trade value based on before this season though.
Posted by: NickC | October 13, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Guys, Lillibridge has lost a lot of value over the past season. Brandon J hurt his value too, but he mashed the last couple of months so I think he would be deemed valuable by a lot of clubs. Lil'bro is only going to be considered as a throw-in for a deal for Peavy.
If the Padres demand A or B from what I listed, if I'm Frank Wren, I think I just fill my top spot through free agency then go after a arb-eligible guy for the 2 spot. Greinke if he's available, someone else if he's not.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:08 PM
derman1984 - not, $9-22M per season isn't "bargain basement." You might think Peavy is still a bargain at those prices (and certainly the first season, he would be), but it's hardly the basement.
The Haren was traded with 3-4 more years on his deal when he was making $4M to 6.75M over the remainder of the deal. Maybe Haren isn't quite Peavy, but he's not too far behind and comes much cheaper. Anyway, at those prices, a lot of teams wouldn't be in the bidding.
Anyway, Peavy's probably getting paid about what's he worth, value-wise, so if you want to split hairs over what "bargain basement" means, go ahead, but I stand by my hyperbole.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 13, 2008 at 04:09 PM
I think the Brewers might emerge as a potential possibility regardless of what happens with the CC Sabathia situation.
It's widely known that the Padres have desperately wanted Tony Gwynn Jr. in their organization and it's becoming more and more evident that the Brewers have an unwillingness to make him an everyday player. Although I'm not how much I read into it, the Brewers are allegedly willing to make either Prince Fielder, JJ Hardy or possibly both available this offseason to bolster the starting rotation. With Adrian Gonzalez at 1B, the Padres would have little interest in Fielder but a deal such as JJ Hardy, Tony Gwynn Jr. and possibly another minor leaguer could be a possibility. Of course, the Padres have Kahalil Greene currently at SS but that's a situation they can't possibly be happy with at the moment.
If Peavy does indeed become available, I would look for the Brewers to be a player in this thing.
Peavy's contract is so ridiculously lopsided (in consideration to the Santana and inevitable Sabathia contracts) that potential suitors will likely be lined up around the block to "overpay" for his services.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:09 PM
"I wonder if the Brewers would be willing to trade away Cain, Jeffress, and Hardy for Peavey."
Wow. Since when do the Brewers have Cain?? And it's Peavy, not Peavey.
Posted by: metzfan22 | October 13, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Yes, the Braves have a large collection of high-end prospects. Not one of them has yet won a Cy Young award, though. None of them have a career ERA+ of 121 with a peak over 150. Peavy's not going to be traded for less than a lot of high-quality players. He's got a bit of an injury history, but he's thrown 800 innings the last 4 seasons. Rich Harden has thrown 612 innings in 6 years.
All this assumes that the Padres are still trying to make a baseball trade and aren't just interested in clearing salary.
Baleen, i.s.s., and a.b.f. all seem to have a good idea of what it would take. It's going to sting. At least one, possibly two, of the untouchables would need to be touched. And that still won't sting as much as the Padres losing Peavy.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 04:12 PM
what if the padres ask for way too much, dont trade him, then he gets hurt next year, then we can see, how much of a bargain that contract is, long contracts can be a negative in some cases. 48 million for '10-'12 could be crippling to a team's finances if player gets injured when they can't move him. brings to mind chris carpenter, but the cards have more financial flexibility and well, talent.
Posted by: yokedog22 | October 13, 2008 at 04:13 PM