![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Closer Situation | Main | Elias Rankings - AL Relievers »
A nugget from Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune:
Kevin Towers said he has heard from clubs interested in trading for ace pitcher Jake Peavy. "We're having talks," he said. The GM said he wouldn't be surprised if the Peavy talks heat up next month.
MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan wrote today that Peavy said he will only waive his no-trade clause for a National League team. However, Peavy's agent Barry Axelrod said Friday that three teams in the American League could entice his client. The Yankees could be one; we discussed the possibility here. A possible Peavy trade will be one of the biggest stories at the Winter Meetings in December.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105357ce735970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Peavy Trade Talks Begin:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
would the padres be interested in
todd frazier - very solid bat , doesnt really have a true position at the moment could play ss , 1st , lf , 2nd
juan francisco - legit power bat still needs to work on his plate discipline , strong arm currently playing 3rd but could move to a corner of spot
homer bailey - hasnt put it together at the big leagues yet but has regained his velocity sitting at 96 in his last start in the aaa playoffs
josh roenicke - bp arm who sits around 95 and can touch 98 to 99
and another low level prospect or 2
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:14 PM
id even try a deal and revolve it around brandon phillips
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:15 PM
he has a no trade clause. Would he rather play in Atlanta (having troubles there) or the cubs (who won 97 games)??
where ya think?
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:17 PM
citron, if the Padres had been so desperate for Tony Gwynn Jr., why wouldn't the Brewers have traded him instead of Inman or Garrison, who were better prospects, for Linebrink? A 4th / 5th outfielder is not going to be a big part of a deal for Jake Peavy.
Hardy's a big chip, but Gwynn's not even spare change in this kind of deal.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 04:18 PM
cubs land .... you gotta have the guys to land peavy thats the thing and the cubs do not
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:22 PM
cubs land, he grew up a Braves fan. He still has a home in Alabama. They play in a favorable home park. They're absolutely #1 on his wish list, if the Padres ask him to accept a trade. Not that he might not say yes to Chicago, but unless the Padre front office is forced to move him by the owner, the Cubs don't have what it would take to get him anyway. So the question won't come up.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 04:23 PM
Both the Braves and the Brewers have the prospects for a deal if they are so inclined. Cubs fans are kidding themselves. Offering up Marquis, Pie etc. is like sitting at the poker table with a "10 high" hand when other players have full-houses and flushes.
Posted by: MickS | October 13, 2008 at 04:23 PM
Does Peavy want to play for the Reds?
I REALLY dont think so lol.. haha the reds? I am sure he wants to get into the playoffs
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:23 PM
cubs wont get him i know that..we need a hitter but anyways Peavy wants to play for a winning team dont you think?
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:24 PM
At that point in time, the Brewers were short on OF's. Also, Tony Gwynn's potential was too much for them to give up on a rental bullpen arm.
My thoughts on Gwynn is that if he's still in Milwaukee, he will be the Brewer's starting CF on opening day 2009. Mike Cameron has a $10M option for 2009 and the Brewers just didn't get enough from him in 2008 to pony up that kind of cash.
I agree that Gwynn isn't much of a chip at the moment but the Padres do want him in their organization and as such, he's a little more than just spare change; not a whole lot more, but more.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Keeping the big names out could the braves use hernandez, kelly johnson, cody johnson, jeff francis, roghburgh (sp), and chuck james/jo jo reyes?? Thats 6 players just like the Haren deal with diamondbacks.
Posted by: BravesWorld | October 13, 2008 at 04:26 PM
ThePadreWay, your post literally just made me sad. We're all sitting here, fans of different teams, trying to decide what it would take for our GM to get your ace. As a 20-something year old Braves fan, I've never had to endure something like that. We've traded Teixeira, Justice, Dye, Renteria and of course Murphy, and we've traded prospects, but we've never seen a player be developed into a star of Peavy's quality then traded at his peak. Take what little solace you can in the fact that whatever the Pads get for him is going to be a haul.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:26 PM
LOL at "cubs land", yeah the Cubs were great during the REGULAR season, but they're still a joke when the postseason comes around.
Bottomline, Atlanta is closer to his home and it's also a smaller market than Chicago. And it's not like the Braves do not put together a competitive team at the beginning of every season over the last 15+ years. And when you compare the two farm systems, it's not even close as to who has the deeper one.
And like I said before, an offer consisting of Hernandez, B. Jones, Morton/Rohrbough, and Lillibridge is a pretty good haul for Peavy (an ace, but also one suspect to injury).
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | October 13, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Braves, Brewers, and Cardinals have the tools in the NL. The Cardinals would have to dig deep, after a couple of years of rebuilding their system they might not be inclined. I'm leaving out the NL West because the Padres don't seem like they'd want to be reminded of the trade all the time, but Colorado and LA both have good systems.
In the AL, it's probably just Boston and NY, with the Angels a possibility. Don't know if any of those three would be interested.
Posted by: ThePadreWay | October 13, 2008 at 04:27 PM
LOL at me? HOW i said peavy wont come t the cubs and YES the CUBS CHOCKED this year...HORRIBLE! but i am just saying dont you think he wants to play for a winning team? What do the Reds offer? Dusty?!? thats a joke
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:28 PM
I think we can all but guarantee that if Peavy were traded, it would not be to any NL West team. That's just bad business.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:29 PM
and the reds have a better chance at winning a world series than the cubs ... i mean whats it been now 500 years .. so does peavy want a chance a world series or be on the biggest joke of a franchise in sports history
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:30 PM
Believe it or not cubs land, there are other winning teams in the NL. Some of them even win playoff games from time to time. =P
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:31 PM
to win the World Series you must first get into the playoffs. That means you must be over .500 and beat the top teams in the NL. Sorry Redsfan
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:32 PM
"Both the Braves and the Brewers have the prospects for a deal if they are so inclined."
Indeed. Both teams have the potential of putting a deal together for him. But Atlanta offers the ability to play closer to home. If he goes anywhere, I believe Atlanta will get him. He wants to play for a contender and Atlanta is just a few small puzzle peices away from just that.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:32 PM
good one citron1616. When did i say the cubs are the best?! THEY CHOCKED I KNOW IT WAS HORRIBLE OKAY! THEY DIDNT DESERVE TO WIN A GAME THEY SUCKED! okay...stop talking about the cubs i get it also do all Cubs fans. i am just saying Peavy will want to go to a winner.
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:34 PM
The Braves have the perfect combination of the type of prospects the Padres will be looking for, the budget to fit in Peavy's contract, and a possible destination of choice for Peavy to waive his no-trade clause (exercising the option is a given in any scenario).
The package would/could include Peavy (and possibly Brian Giles - think about it - if he'd waive his no-trade too). The Braves would send Kelly Johnson/Brent Lillibridge, Charlie Morton/Jojo Reyes, Jordan Schafer/Brandon Jones, and two or three lower level prospects depending on which of the other guys are included.
This would net the Pads 3 MLB-ready players and 2 - 3 prospects.
Posted by: Thundersticks | October 13, 2008 at 04:37 PM
Yep, if they add Peavy, they should still have enough to go out and get a left fielder with some pop. Guys like Abreu, Dunn and Burrell come to mind. My preference would probably be Dunn since we really don't need a high average since Francoeur is the only regular that has trouble hitting over .250. However it frightens me to have two base clogger in the everyday lineup (Mac and Dunn).
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | October 13, 2008 at 04:37 PM
the reds have the pieces to get him ( unlike the cubs ) the question is could there package beat out a braves or brewers or cards package and if not would they overpay to try and get him
frazier
soto
francisco
bailey
roencike
stewart
valika
ramierez
possibly brandon phillips
drew stubbs
the pieces are there the question is is it worth giving up a big haul to get him
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:38 PM
I think people really over value people wanting to play near home. With all the time spent on the road and at the park and in the weight room and in the video room and in the batting cage (etc.), there is hardly any time to be wherever it is you call home anyways. Sure, i'm sure it's nice to sleep in your own bed on the days you do get a chance to go there, but there's not a great deal of difference between the two scenarios.
And with the Braves essentially in the middle of a rebuild and continuing down that path with a number of aging players, would Peavy be willing to spend the prime years of his career on a rebuilding team who is not likely to compete for a championship for the next number of years just so that he is close to home?
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:39 PM
cubsland it doesnt matter if he wants to go to a winner the cubs have to have the pieces to even get the pads to agree to the trade then he could waive his no trade clause .. its not like hes a FA and he can just pick where he wants to go
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Reds winniner %:
-.457
-.494
-.451
-.469
-.426
-.414
What do the Reds have that well make them into a NL contender? Dusty? HAHA
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:41 PM
he has a NO TRADE CLAUSE
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:41 PM
Redsfan: DO I HAVE TO SAY IT AGAIN: THE CUBS WILL NOT GET HIM.. im talking as a baseball fan. he will not want to go there. (look at the winner %). he will go to the Braves if he goes anywhere
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:42 PM
Yeah, but Atlanta not only suffered this year due to injuries to half the projected rotation, but they have $45 million to spend in free agency.
Add Peavy, a #2 and a power bat and all of a sudden we're a contender again.
Posted by: NickC | October 13, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Talking baseball with a cubs fan is like talking to a wet newspaper. Even if it did ever have something good say, you just don't wanna read it anyways.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:44 PM
cubs land
The Braves have around $60MM committed in salaries for '09 and expect to have a payroll just north of $100MM. They want to add 2 top of the rotation pitchers as well as a legitimate power hitter in LF. The lesson of relying on older players has been learned; the days of signing the likes of Raul Mondesi John Thompson to fill holes are over and done with. I expect us to be back in the fold next season.
***Flash-Foward to 2009***
In left field, for the Braves, Sammy Sosa!!!...groan.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:44 PM
you dont want to hear it cuz u know the reds will never be a winning team. Man just face it. You had a winner % in Spring Training CONGRATS!
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:45 PM
according to a certain asst. general manager (i wont say who, nor will i ask him questions for any of you,i was friends with him before he got his job but we still talk to one another, and i called him up to get together with him and we got to talking) the top 5 teams the the padres said the peavy will play for are:
5: Mets
4: Cardinals
3: Cubs
2: Yankees
1: phillies
not in any order
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 04:45 PM
i dont know alot about the braves but readin about them from people they have good talent that is how i am saying if he goes anywhere, he will go there.
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:46 PM
"peavy will veto anything to the east cause he knows that means less wins and higher ERA and his free agent money contract will go down."
Oh goodness. You ever think that one reason the NL West doesn't hit much outside of Colorado might be the quality of pitching? Jake Peavy is an ace in any park in baseball. The PETCO "advantage" is not all that pronounced given that he is a K and GB pitcher, and his home/road splits seem more linked to control than people hitting him hard.
Posted by: AA | October 13, 2008 at 04:46 PM
Oh, btw cubs land, my experiences with cubs fans have always been pretty positive. They always invade the Ted when the cubbies come to town and I've had some good, sane, baseball conversations with some cubs folks. It probably doesn't hurt that they're one of my "other" teams. WGN + Primestar = closet cubs fan in rural Gerogia.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:51 PM
"according to a certain asst. general manager (i wont say who, nor will i ask him questions for any of you,i was friends with him before he got his job but we still talk to one another, and i called him up to get together with him and we got to talking) the top 5 teams the the padres said the peavy will play for are:"
Right...and I talked to Jake's brother's best friends wife's sister who said that Peavy thinks the Cubs are quite possibly the worst franchise in the history of all of sports. Also, Jake happens to be a fan of goats and plays fantasy football with Steve Bartman.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:52 PM
cubsland....the reds are up and coming unlike the cubs who waste money on garbage players ( fukodome ) all reds fan are happy with the direction the team is going. having walt jocketty as gm who is proven and willing to make trades to improve the team and an owner who wants to win . young players coming through the system like bruce , cueto , trading for volqeuz , votto ( who put up better numbers than ur precious soto in a worse lineup ) trading griffey and dunn , the reds are going in the right direction and if you say your a " baseball " fan you would know the reds are a up and coming team
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 04:53 PM
yea but a lot of cubs fans think they can get everybody. i think the cubs needs a for sale time for some of their players, but that is for another time. I just think that Peavy will want to go to a contender.
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:54 PM
ChiTownCubbies, I like the effort. Really, I do. But if you're going for an epic troll, it's got to at least be believable.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:54 PM
haha okay well i hope the reds will have another over .500% in Spring Training. All the reds fans i know, think they are not doing the right thing, but since ur the expert i will listen to you
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM
And redsfan, there's probably less of a chance of Peavy going to Cinci. than there is of him going to Chicago.
The reds are completely rebuilding (although they are getting closer) and they can't draw any fans. Not to mention, Great American Ballpark is the exact opposite of PetCo Park and no pitcher wants to go there to play if he can help it.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM
yeah i hope cuban is just playing the economic turmoil in an attempt to get a better deal on the cubbies. to see him back out would suck for the current owners but even more so for cubs fans.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM
i think there is a better chance he goes to the reds than the cubs ... i dont think he goes to either i think he stays or goes to the braves but the reds have the pieces if they wanted to i just dont see the cubs with the pieces i mean Pie ? seriously
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 05:01 PM
i agree Redsfan!! WOW WE AGREE.. PIE is a joke, seriously. he jsut cant hit. The cubs have given him so many tries and he has failed. i just dont see how Cubs fans see that he will be a top player. he CANT hit
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 05:03 PM
and i disagree with completely rebuilding i just dont see how you say that .. by trading griffey ? griffey was a bum with the reds getting rid of him was an upgrade .. trading dunn ? who couldnt bring a runner in unless he hit a hr and was horrible with runners in scoring position . by letting bako and patterson walk ? the rotation still has arroyo , harang the pen still has a solid closer . still have phillips. walt has said he is looking for rh run producer to trade for this offseason . i just dont agree with your completely rebuilding statement
Posted by: redsfan | October 13, 2008 at 05:04 PM
OMFG citron1616, your talking s*** on a f**king computer, your a internet gangster. get out of your mom's basement and feel the sunlight you p*s*y. You can talk s**t all you want about the cubs and go for it cause i've (we) heard it all,it doesnt bother me. what team do you like??
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 05:04 PM
"Right...and I talked to Jake's brother's best friends wife's sister who said that Peavy thinks the Cubs are quite possibly the worst franchise in the history of all of sports. Also, Jake happens to be a fan of goats and plays fantasy football with Steve Bartman."
Amen brother. I love these posts where somebody "knows someone". I didnt think it was possible after last offseason, but chitowncubbies is proving to be as ridiculous as cubs land was last year. This guy, cubs land, cubs forever, cubbies 2008, nancy echo should get their own website and call it " were the cubs and were getting everyone we want because we can". 24/7 of every possible trade scenario imagined involving the "great" Veal, Pie, Cedeno, Hill, Ceda, Marshall and whatever other nonsense they can throw at the wall. Where is Aduncaroo to put these people in their place?
Posted by: forlife61 | October 13, 2008 at 05:05 PM
i dont want Peavy really, he has history of arms problems or whatever, and we already have that! HARDEN!
GO CUBS GO
Posted by: cubs land | October 13, 2008 at 05:08 PM
You're the one who's gotta use profanity every other word in your response...but i'm the "internet gangster"?
Riiiigghhhtttt.....
Besides, the basement is so comfortable and mom makes me meatloaf whenever I want...and I burn easily so me and the sun don't mix well.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 05:12 PM
the rangers have the system to get peavy, but he most likely is on the "no way on earth am i pitching there" list. plus sand diego owes the rangers one anyway for the gonzalez/young deal.
How about:
Hurley
Borbon
Ramirez
Martin Perez
Engel Beltre
German Duran
Jose Vallejo
thats 7 solid guys. hurley was a very high prospect, and did look good when he wasnt injured this year. borbon/ramirez/perez/beltre/vallejo, are 6/7/10/11/16 on the rankings of texas' farm crop,and borbon and ramirez would be much higher if not for the depth of the rangers system. its a solid haul, with 3 major league ready players (hurley, ramirez, borbon [tore up the minors this season]), and beltre is considered a future top prospect as well.
unfortunately, peavy probably would never want to play for the rangers, so this is all for nothing anyway. a rangers fan can only dream...
Posted by: tmoney352 | October 13, 2008 at 05:16 PM
we'll your all acting like children, but the cubs are the best team in the NL even though they got beat, peavy would be nice but a left handed bat or 2 would be nice.
we need a real leadoff hitter i think we need to persue or trade for Rafael furcal or brian roberts who are both switch hitters, then put soriano in the 6 or 7 hole, then try to get adam dunn (i know he strikes out a lot but he hits over 40 homeruns and he walks over 100 times) put him at either 5,6,7.
what do yall think?
Posted by: nF I BigShoTzZ | October 13, 2008 at 05:22 PM
tmoney352...I think Texas' proximity to home, plus their offense, leads me to think Peavy might be more open to the Rangers than you think. The ballpark would be the only negative, albeit a potentially significant one.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 05:32 PM
Texas certainly has the pieces to put up a good offer, but as was mentioned in the article, Peavy would only trade his no-clause for 3 AL teams and my guess would be that 2 of those teams reside in the AL East and the other isn't the Rangers.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 05:34 PM
Angels get: Peavy
Padres get: Adenhart
Weaver
Sean Rodriguez
I think that is pretty good for both squads
Posted by: BK | October 13, 2008 at 05:38 PM
forgot about the no-trade/no-AL, very true citron.
Posted by: baleen | October 13, 2008 at 05:40 PM
I think it may be a bit far-fetched to think the Cubs would be adding any other big pieces. All name calling and hatred aside, the Cubs' payroll was up nearly $20M from the previous year to about $119M. With salary increases for guys like Zambrano ($2.75M), Ramirez ($1.65M), Soriano ($3M), Ted Lilly($5M !!), Fukudome ($5.5M!!!), Jason Marquis ($3.75M), Mark DeRosa ($750K), and add in Rich Harden's $7M, the Cubs are going to be looking at a pretty hefty overall increase. Take into account that Dempster needs to be resigned and Kerry Wood may be resigned too and the Cubs may be looking at their team payroll ballooning from $118M to $150M. That's not really attractive for a team in the midst of an ownership change.
I think the Cubs are going to pretty much go at it next season with about the same look as 2008. They have all the pieces but just need to figure out how to win a postseason game.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 05:44 PM
I actually wouldn't be surprised to see the Cubs trade a guy like Derek Lee and replace him with Micah Hoffpauir at 1B. Lee demands $13M a year for 2009 and 2010.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 05:47 PM
i agree with you citron, maybe trade a derek lee but to who and for whai agree though. But the cubs need a leadoff hitter and or a lefthanded bat maybe a leadoff lefty.
Posted by: nF I BigShoTzZ | October 13, 2008 at 05:52 PM
The Cubs have a left-handed leadoff hitter . A very expensive one from Japan that is going to have to put together a good offseason and improve in a number of areas. The Cubs are now pretty much tied to him as an everyday player because of how much money they threw at him.
The other alternative, and one that I wouldn't be surpised to see the Cubs explore would be to see if the Orioles are interested in Derek Lee in some sort of exchange for Brian Roberts (I won't even pretend to be able to speculate on the rest of the details of such a trade). If that were to happen, the Cubs would then be able to insert Hoffpauir at 1B, Roberts at 2B and leadoff and then move DeRosa permanently to RF and have a very expensive bench player in Fukudome until he improves.
I hate the Cubs with a passion so hopefully this doesn't happen but there are a lot of great minds at work in baseball's front offices and i'm sure somebody has already "ground the gears" in thinking of a possibility such as this one.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 06:02 PM
Really I don't think the Cubs make any sense for Peavy. They already have a solid rotation with Zambrano, Harden, Lilly, Marquis and possibly Dempster. The cost to land Peavy will be massive, and at this point I'm not sure the Cubs have what it takes to make a sensible deal.
I seriously doubt the Padres would entertain a package centered around Josh Vitters, Felix Pie and Jose Ceda, to be fair none of those guys is the cornerstone type prospect you want to land for a player of Peavy's value.
If the Cubs REALLY wanted Peavy, this is how I could see it happen:
Jake Peavy for Geovany Soto, Felix Pie, Jose Ceda, Tyler Colvin and Sean Marshall.
The Padres would get an elite catcher with just one year of experience, two potentially quality outfielders, and two good young pitchers. Realistically, the Cubs would have to give up Marmol or Soto to land Peavy, and honestly it may take Vitters on top of that regardless.
In terms of Peavy, I think that a package for Tommy Hanson could have him end up in Atlanta, but I think that the Rangers would definitely be in the bidding as well.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 13, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Any team that calls has to have a few things.
1. deep farm system, willingness to part with a TON
2. $$$
3. Not in the NL WEST
4. 1 of 3 teams in the AL
5. Peavy has to want to be there
That eliminates a lot of teams that would be interested. Who is left after taking those things into account?
Posted by: Bernie Brewer | October 13, 2008 at 06:25 PM
And by the way, I know this isn't a Cubs post, its a Peavy post, but I went through that already, and as for the D-Lee trade suggestions, I have two ideas:
Lee to the Angels for Chone Figgins and Kendry Morales
or
Lee to the Yankees for Johnny Damon and Melky Cabrera
In one the Cubs would land Figgins to take over in center and Morales to take over at first, and Figgins would become the leadoff hitter. The Angels would get Lee to take over at first base to replace the potentially departing Teixeira. Brandon Wood and Maicer Izturis can get time at third, or they could persue an alternative. The Cubs could then use the saved money to potentially add a lefty RF or maybe a reliever.
With the Yankees one, the Cubs would get Damon to either take over in center or take over in left, with Fukudome in center and Soriano in right. Damon would obviously leadoff, and Cabrera would simply give the Cubs a fourth outfielder who could play all of the positions and potentially become more than that however unlikely that may be.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 13, 2008 at 06:37 PM
"Wow. Since when do the Brewers have Cain??"
Lorenzo Cain. Obviously I wouldn't be talking about the Cain from San Francisco. Are Mutz fans this dumb?
Posted by: Nate crew | October 13, 2008 at 06:55 PM
How about a Peavy trade TO the Twins?
Peavy to MIN
Kouzmanoff to MIN
Young to SD
Slowey to SD
Duensing to SD
Valencia to SD
Posted by: Krisjian | October 13, 2008 at 07:01 PM
^ I don't think they have the payroll to fit Peavy's contract over the longhaul. But if it becomes known that the Twins are interested then I would definitely like to see them try and land Peavy.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | October 13, 2008 at 07:04 PM
"Yeah, assuming he can actually make it through a season without getting hurt. 167 innings won't do it."
Huh? Being a Cubs fan, I'm thinking, WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?! When was Marquis injured? Must be a different one. Since when is 167 innings made out to be an injury plagued season. Peavy has 6 more IP than him.
Posted by: blind527 | October 13, 2008 at 07:18 PM
Come on Scribble - the Angels don't want Lee at $13m/year when they can have Tex at $18m. Giving up Figgins creates 2 holes (leadoff and 3rd base).
On a related note. Just came across Keith Law's latest notes from the AFL. Here is his quote on a few notable Cub prospects (posted on Sunday):
"Cub left-hander Donald Veal looked bad in his outing Thursday, with well-below-average command of an 88-93 mph fastball, usually finishing his delivery with his head down so he couldn't see where the ball was going. He does have a solid-average curveball with a two-plane break, almost at a 45-degree angle to the ground, but he can't get to it when he's always behind in the count. Outfielder Tyler Colvin still projects to top out as a fourth outfielder; he has good bat speed but doesn't recognize offspeed pitches at all."
I know Cubs fans - Keith Law is an idiot who doesn't know anything. Save it. Just thought I would provide a recent evaluation of two names we see in every proposed Cubs trade. Turns out we aren't the only ones who are skeptical when it comes to Veal and Colvin.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 13, 2008 at 07:21 PM
What if the Astros got involved? Think of Oswalt and Peavy 1-2. The trade talks could begin with players like JR Towles/ Hunter Pence, Troy Patton. Don't know really anyone else though from there system. Some team from the Central will land Peavy IF he doesn't get traded to the West
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | October 13, 2008 at 07:31 PM
What on earth would the Astros have to offer in a trade? They need everything they have and have quite a few offensive holes of their own. I think the Astros are going to target Ben Sheets to put at the top of that rotation with Oswalt.
I would imagine that Pence is untouchable as he is the future of that franchise. Catcher is the Astros' weakest position, not to mention that Towles is going to draw about zero interest around the league; there's not a lot of interest for a horribly undersized catcher who hit .137 last season.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 07:53 PM
I disagree with nearly everyone in here for one simple reason: The Padres WILL NOT trade Peavy inside the National League. That would be very stupid, seeing as how they would need to face him at least twice per year for 5 years. IF he gets traded (I think he will), it will be to one of the 3 A.L. teams he said he would approve trades to.
Posted by: soxfan93 | October 13, 2008 at 08:00 PM
Why would they have to face him twice a year for the next 5 years. For example, as I suggested that the Brewers could get involved, Peavy only faced them once this season.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 08:04 PM
Why is it whenever anyone mentions a trade involving Holliday or Atkins, almost every post is about bad home/road splits. But no one mentions it for Peavy. Honestly, they aren't good. Any team playing in a hitters park should be worried.
Posted by: mkorpal | October 13, 2008 at 08:31 PM
Peavy wont go to the astros for 2 reasons. One is they have very little minor league talent compared to atlanta/milwaukee/cincinatti. Also, they arent looking for an ace in return, which Oswalt is. They would be much more interested in 2-3 ML ready players and a prospect or two.
Atlanta will NOT trade Escobar or Jurrjens. Along with Chipper and McCann these are the only non-tradable players.
I think a trade for Peavy could look like:
an infielder:
Johnson/Prado/Lilabridge
outfielder:
Jones/Shafer/Anderson/Blanco
starter
Jojo/Morton/James/Parr
and a few prospects (their talent levels will be determined by the talent of the IF/OF/SP selected)
This would get atlanta the ace they need and would get the padres an infielder (to go with gonzalez, greene and kouz), a young ML ready outfielder (blanco and anderson could lead off) a pitcher to help rebuild their staff, and prospects to use in the future.
Both sides are happy. And by adding another starter and power outfield bat, the braves are right back in it. And the padres are on the right path to get out of the cellar.
Thoughts?
Posted by: bravesfansc | October 13, 2008 at 08:36 PM
I would say Lilibridge, Shafer, Jojo, and Hanson would have to go. Lets not forget that they don't have to trade Peavy. They will have to be blown away to deal him.
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 08:50 PM
"Why is it whenever anyone mentions a trade involving Holliday or Atkins, almost every post is about bad home/road splits. But no one mentions it for Peavy. Honestly, they aren't good. Any team playing in a hitters park should be worried."
I would hardly call a 3.80 ERA "not good"; that's his career road ERA. And who's to say that that 2.77/3.80 home/road split is entirely because of Petco Park? Most pitchers, and all players for that matter, just play better at home than on the road. It's more about getting used to the mound than it is about anything else.
With that being said, what organization wouldn't want to pay $56M over the next 4 years (comes out to $14M per) to have a guy who is going to likely have an ERA between 3.00 and 3.50, pitch very deep into ballgames, save your bullpen, and almost always give your team a chance to win?
Sure, his splits could be considered a bit discouraging but Peavy is one of the top 5-10 pitchers in all of baseball and his contract is a bargain for what he can give you.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 08:52 PM
I'm not worried about Peavy because he is a power pitcher and not a fly ball pitcher. He should adjust fine wherever he goes.
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 08:54 PM
Just curious, but what happened to the Redsox fans who suggested that "Lester for Peavy straight up would be a bad idea for the Sox." Watching him get shelled at home tonight was just a confirmation that most baseball fans overvalue there own players and discount everyone else.
Fun to see myopia in action...
Posted by: SanDiegoGuy | October 13, 2008 at 09:01 PM
is there any chance the dodgers/ pads can do another trade? i know its for an ace, and would require many high level prospects for the pads. do u think this could happen? would the pads want to have to face peavy many times during the yr?
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | October 13, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I hope to one day live in a world where I won't have to hear a GM complain about trading within the division.
Look, it's real simple. You make a trade because you believe it will make your team better. Nobody trades to make your team worse. Why wouldn't you want to trade within your division. Obviously you believe you are getting the better end of the deal. Why not exploit that advantage?
Posted by: bjsguess | October 13, 2008 at 09:29 PM
wow...this is just hysterical
redsfan,
as a reds fan myself, i don't know where you are coming from. we certainly have the system to get in the ropes, but why would we? we have very little offense and 7 guys fighting for the 5th spot, the only spot open in the rotation. if we unload any of those guys it will be for
(A) A RH Power Bat
(B) A top tier catching prospect
(C) An all around SS who can field the position and carry a bat
(D) Prince Fielder
there is no way that WJ should even consider entering the peavy sweepstakes.
tmoney352,
you are right, the rangers have the talent to get him (if he would waive his NTC), but your offer was a joke...it is going to start above your 6th prospect. anything they offered would have to be centered around Hamilton or Kinsler. I would hang up if they ask for Kinsler, but hamilton should be considered. A couple small pieces and they could pull this off without selling the farm.
Most of these proposals are rediculous...most signifying i didn't read all of them and grant i might have missed something, but of what i saw, if that was the best offers, Peavy will be a padre in 2009. Especially the Cubs and Yanks offers...those made me laugh...you guys have a sense of humor.
Posted by: coltholt | October 13, 2008 at 09:32 PM
Out of all the names I have seen "offered" for Peavy from the Cubs none of the packages of players will get it done. Pie is bcoming another Corey Patterson if you trade Pie then they need to keep Colvin as the lefty OF prospect, Cedeno would be trade before Theriot Marquis is a 5th starter. The Cubs dont need to get another stud pitcher.
Zambrano just needs strength and conditioning Harden has to be carefull Lilly is a proven 3rd starter Dempster should resign and the Cubs have Marshall Marquis and Hart as a 5th starter. The more pressing needs for the Cubs are as follows.
Lefty bat (with power a bonus)
Middle Relief
Everyday CF
Teach Kosuke how to hit for a full season.
Closer (If Wood leaves)
4th starter ( If Dempter Leaves)
Posted by: ryno23 | October 13, 2008 at 09:48 PM
"according to a certain asst. general manager (i wont say who, nor will i ask him questions for any of you,i was friends with him before he got his job but we still talk to one another, and i called him up to get together with him and we got to talking"
What a bunch of crap!
PS: Cubs fans, why do you want/need another ace SP? Your big 3 laid an egg this time, don't blow up your system.
Posted by: Land-Man | October 13, 2008 at 10:18 PM
i really thought you would give us some inside info. not sure where you were going with that
Posted by: jtd | October 13, 2008 at 10:21 PM
I think the Padres fans need to look at things from another team's perspective...
Yes, Peavy is a "Proven Ace". He has been a workhorse, he has electric stuff, his numbers look great. No question that he is very accomplished in his relatively short career.
BUT
Any team would have to seriously consider his most recent season, and this season he did not make it to the 200 inning mark due to an ELBOW injury (the second injury in his career to his pitching arm). He also had extreme home/road splits. His contract, while not too bad, is heavily backloaded.
Now, any opposing team would have to have injury concerns. Honestly, he isn't coming off the greatest season to be traded.
Now, take into account that one of the primary buyers is likely the Braves from many reports. The Braves have to be concerned as they had the following injury list last year:
Peter Moylan: Tommy John after posting a 1.80 ERA over 90 innings in 2007
Raphael Soriano: out almost all season with phantom elbow pains.
Mike Gonzalez- Returning from TJ.
John Smoltz: Shoulder Surgery
Tom Glavine: Elbow Surgery after never going on the DL through pretty much his entire HOF career.
Tim Hudson: Tommy John
And of course we were victims of the famous Mike Hampton contract. Can you see why there would be some caution?
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 13, 2008 at 11:07 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++
Matt Gamel 3B/OF
Jermey Jerffers SP
Angel Salmone C
Tyler Green 3B
++++++++++++++++++
Somebody suggest this would be the price for Peavy. LOL!!!
The price for Peavy is simply going to cost more than next best offer. Gamel/Jeffres would qualify as more than anyone else could offer, so Milwaukee wouldn't just throw in T Greene and A Salmone just because. LOL
The Yanks best offer would be Hughes/A Jackson. Gamel/Jeffress would be just as good. If not, then maybe you could add one (not 2) more players.
If the cost was really 4 top prospects, then signing CC would be the better move at that point.
Posted by: BeanoCook | October 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Cubs prospects LOL!
Posted by: BeanoCook | October 13, 2008 at 11:12 PM
how does this sound if the redsox were to go for him, the deal would have to look like this:
Sox trade for Peavy.
Send:
SP-Buchholz (post prospect since has been in the majors)
RP-Daniel Bard (#3 prospect)
OF-Ryan Kalish (#12 was talked about in the Johan trade)
C-George Kottaras (#31. isnt really worth roster space for the sox and we have higher rated catchers)
SS-Julio Lugo + 11-14mil. for his final 2 years of the 18 million on his contract
gives a few good prospects, and a SS to take the place of Greene when he's traded/leaves
Posted by: fgsfsfbbbrd | October 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM
Plus a few other lower level prospects
Posted by: fgsfsfbbbrd | October 13, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Just a thought, but very nearly every single major pitcher that has been acquired in a trade in the past four years or so has been traded out of their respective league except for Erik Bedard (and I'm sure there are other minor ones such as Brad Penny that I'm not counting, but that was in 2005 anyway and Penny was one of many names in that deal).
You have Johan Santana, Tim Hudson, Mark Mulder, Dan Haren, CC Sabathia, Dontrelle Willis, Josh Beckett, Rich Harden, Randy Johnson, Joe Blanton, Chris Young, and I'm sure countless other pitchers that I can't think of right now. Just think of the idea that most of the time pitchers really don't get traded into the same league.
And that's not exactly coincidental - just try to think of all the pitchers that have been traded as cornerstones in a deal that are dealt within the same league. The number is pretty small.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 13, 2008 at 11:30 PM
Well as a Braves fan I would definitely love to have Peavy in a Braves uni and I think this idea should have him playing for the Braves come next year.
Padres get:
Kelly Johnson - 2B
Charlie Morton/Jo-Jo Reyes - SP
Manny Acosta - RP
Brandon Jones - OF/Brent Lillibridge - SS(either one)
Gorkys Hernandez - CF
Jeff Locke/Cole Rohrbough - SP
Braves get:
Jake Peavy - SP
This deal would give the Pad three ML ready players in Johnson, Morton/Reyes, Acosta and Jones/Lillibridge. A player would should be ready in late 2009 but definitely 2010 in Hernandez and one high upside LHP in Locke/Rohrbough.
Posted by: Jay212033 | October 13, 2008 at 11:45 PM
"+++++++++++++++++++++
Matt Gamel 3B/OF
Jermey Jerffers SP
Angel Salmone C
Tyler Green 3B
++++++++++++++++++
Somebody suggest this would be the price for Peavy. LOL!!!"
My thoughts exactly. While that may be a price the Padres would ask for, that would certainly be a very short phone call. 3 of the 4 names on that list are probably all but untouchable. Mat Gamel is going to be a very large cog in this organization. It's unlikely that Fielder is a Brewer any longer than he has to be and the Brewers are running short on OF's. Gamel will likely never play 3B in the big leagues but he could play 1B and the corner OF position not occupied by Ryan Braun (with Corey Hart presumably moving to CF within the next year or so). Jeremy Jeffress is a young pitcher with ace written all over him; assuming he can keep the bong out of his daily routine. The Brewers have absolutely zero future at 3B as of right now because Bill Hall has become less than worthless. Taylor Green may have to be pushed through the minors quicker than originally planned because of the deficiency at the hot corner. Salome is the probably the only name on that list that could be available. Brett Lawrie is though to be on a fast-track to the big leauges (he says he wants to spend no more than a year and a half in the farm)and the Brewers are pretty deep in catching prospects at the moment.
Like I said, that may be what the Padres want, but the Brewers wouldn't be hearing it.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 13, 2008 at 11:49 PM
cubs get: peavy
padres get: josh vitters, josh ceda, Jeremy Papelbon (the brother of Johnathon papelbon), Tyler Colvin, Jason Dubois, Micah Hoffpauir, and a qaulity major leaguer mike fontenot.
we dont need peavy unless we
dont sign dempster or a top a free agent.
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | October 13, 2008 at 11:51 PM
Boston has a deep farm system if the Padres did not want proven ML starters, like Clay Bucholz, Michael Bowden and maybe Daniel Bard, a Righty reliever whom can hit 100+ MPH on the radar and will be at AAA next season after tearing up AA Portland this past season.
They also have several Nice outfielders/infielders in Lars Anderson (good power hitter) and Josh Reddick (both 21) whom will be at AA, or AAA next year and will be mentioned in most any proposed trades probably this off season.
Interesting regarding Jeremy Papelbon in the Padres farm system. Josh Papelbon (his brother also) is playing in 1 of the Sox A ball teams as well, though he has never done very much performance wise the last 2-3 years.
Posted by: johns | October 14, 2008 at 12:03 AM
Did someone just say that Clay Bucholz was a proven ML starter?
Posted by: bjsguess | October 14, 2008 at 12:26 AM
Peavy in the Red Sox rotation would be fantastic. If it does happend, Theo might be thinking about letting go of Beckett when his contract runs out.
Posted by: SierraM | October 14, 2008 at 02:34 AM
The thing that I think a lot of you guys are forgetting or refusing to look at is that Kevin Towers doesn't have to unload Peavy. He has stated that he would need to be blown away to make a move. You guys can keep laughing off all kinds or scenarios that are being thrown out but the truth is that someone is probably going to have to overpay to get Towers to bite. If if doesn't happen the Padres will just keep their #1 ace that is signed to a nice below market contract. The Padres have every bit of leverage in this situation outside of Peavy's no trade which if he wants to win as he has stated probably won't be an issue. Once C.C. signs the action should heat up, and depending on where he lands someone might get aggressive.
Posted by: krs1 | October 14, 2008 at 03:04 AM
"Did someone just say that Clay Bucholz was a proven ML starter?"
Heck no, just like Bowden and never pitched in BL Bard. All are still classified as rookies I mention am pretty sure.
Posted by: johns | October 14, 2008 at 04:02 AM
Okay. Okay. Let's sum this all up thus far:
"My team should trade for Jake Peavey [apparently also acquiring the rights to change the spelling of his name]. And to get that done they should offer a package consisting of: a single-A outfielder, a sack of barber hair and a wish."
Brilliant, obviously. But assuming you're not a major league baseball GM (and 40% of you probably aren't), would this logic apply? I'm guessing... not.
Yes, I bet the Yankees (and any other team for that matter, but Yankees and Red Sox fans seem to be overrepresented) would like to acquire Jake Peavy for once-lauded but now-tarnished prospects. That would make a ton of sense to Kevin Towers, the man who once fleeced Adrian Gonzalez (all-star) and Chris Young (ibid.) from the Rangers for Adam Eaton and a handful of buttons and string.
So really, everyone spinning their dream scenarios for Peavy really needs to stop. Yes, if San Diego had to move their ace pitcher in a fire sale, where everyone was literally on fire, he might go cheaply for 3 prospects that your organization likes but doesn't like-like. That, alas, is not the case. Peavy is signed through 2012 (with a 2013 option) at a far-below-going-rate contract, so I'd think most competitive teams would take notice. You know who's set to make more next year than Jake Peavy? Carlos Silva and Bronson Arroyo. Who are both better pitchers, so, you know, that works out.
My point is, can we restore some sanity to this discussion? I would love to have Peavy on my team, as you would yours. But really now... consider the totality of the situation. Better than even odds say he doesn't get moved at all in the offseason. And if a bidding war does ensure, it would be exactly that -- a bidding war. The dialogue of which generally doesn't involve the phrase "I'll see your Felix Pie, and raise you a Player to Be Named Later."
Posted by: reallynow | October 14, 2008 at 05:35 AM