![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cubs Interested in Randy Johnson | Main | Steinbrenner Ready To Offer Burnett, Lowe Contracts »
According to Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle, the Giants have spoken with Scott Boras about Manny Ramirez and Mark Teixeira, but it's unknown if they've made them any offers.
Giants director of player personnel Bobby Evans told Schulman "we're willing to go after the best talent we can."
The Giants haven't offered Rafael Furcal a contract, but Paul Kinzer, Furcal's agent, said that the Giants and Furcal have "serious interest" in each other. Schulman mentions Oakland as possible competition for the Giants, and the Royals could be among the many teams interested in the shortstop.
Schulman believes Furcal is looking for at least a four-year deal worth $10MM a year.
The Giants have also spoken with C.C. Sabathia's representatives.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535f7b466970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Giants Considering Top Players:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If San Fran signs CC I'd consider moving north and marrying Sabean, even though I no longer can legally do so.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 15, 2008 at 11:33 AM
The Giants NEED to sign some top players. Aside from great pitching who do they even have?
They need more power and more star power. Plain and simple.
They have Winn, Rowand and..... who else? They have literally NO ONE in their infield. Even last season they had who? Aurilla and a past prime Vizquel?
All the super pitching in the league wont any good without some offense and they have none right now.
I hear and see these Giants/Sabathia rumours and I just laugh at them because theyd have to be completely out to lunch to go and even try offering Sabathia big cash with no team to support him.
Theyve obviously got a massive amount of money to spend and that money needs to be spent on some top flite type players with offensive capabilities. Otherwise, good luck trying to keep Lincecum and the other young pitchers in San Fran.
Posted by: xethicx | November 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM
I no longer take the "serious interest" in each other or the "mutual interest" serious anymore.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 15, 2008 at 11:37 AM
xethicx, you're very clearly not a follower of the Giants, because you suggested that Rowand was one of our best players last year, when really, Winn and Lewis were the stars of the outfield. And as for having no one in the infield, here's a name for you to learn:
Pablo Sandoval.
Let's return to this space in June or July and talk about how he's no one.
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 11:40 AM
anybody willing to reconsider howard for cain?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 15, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Management:
No Im not a fan but I did watch a lot of Giants ball this past season.
I wasnt suggesting that Rowand and Winn were offensive stars I was merely stating that theyre the only names the Giants have. In my opinion Rowand is GROSSLY over paid for his skill set and Winn's best year are gone.
And man, I am sorry but I am not a believer of rookie superstar predictions because in baseball, no one is a sure thing. I know who Sandoval is and I think he has great potential but even still, thats ONE of FOUR primary infield positions. There's 3 more holes to fill on the infield and 1 in the outfield for the Giants.
I dont even know why the Giants are discussing Sabathia when pitching is the only part of the Giants team that doesnt need an overhaul.
Posted by: xethicx | November 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Yeah. That is all the Giants need, more expensive contracts.
Posted by: green_and_gold | November 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
PhilsWS: A one for one trade for the Giants of Cain would be pure suicide for the club. Let alone for an older player. Add to that a new Managing General Partner ( or what ever title you want to give the Boss Wog owner) I doubt Sabean would survive long enough to make such a move no matter how tempted he might be.
Xethicx: The point is the Giants infield ( in danger of being a Super Fund site the last couple years) has some really possibilities to improve. They have been almost as brutal defensively has they have been offensively. So the bar is not real high there and marked improvement can happen without drastic moves.
As for your other question about retaining the young players. Don’t clog up the payroll with more unproductive medium (or larger sized) contracts over the life of the contract and yes they can quite easily. In other don’t settle for free agents that don’t offer clear upgrades. Pretty much any INF free agent outside of Tex (maybe Hudson) falls into this category.
Posted by: daveinexile | November 15, 2008 at 12:25 PM
I should add an upgrade for the life of the contract. Not just a year or two when is come to the free agents. Unless of coarse the free agent is only signed for a year or two.
Posted by: daveinexile | November 15, 2008 at 12:28 PM
I think I would sign two major bats. The West is so horrible year and year out, a below .500 team still has a chance to win that division.
I would like them to see them go for Manny and Orlando Hudson.
I like high OBP guys, and would really like these two to help drive in runs and provide baserunners.
I really think a suprise move would be to sign Varitek. I don't care about his hitting, but I feel he would be an amazing leader for Lincecum, Cain, possibly Zito and Sanchez. If they signed him for 2-3 years, would love to see him work with Bumgardner and Alderson as well.
Posted by: theJonathan | November 15, 2008 at 12:42 PM
If they don't sign Furcal or Teixeira, I'd rather the Giants not get much of anything for the infield -- and they certainly do not need another outfielder. They may not have names, but Winn and Lewis are strong, I think Rowand will rebound some, because he'll have learned you can't force it at this ballpark, you just have to go for the gaps, and we need to see what Schierholtz can do. Furcal would be a big plus. If they can get him for 3 years and $30 or $33 million, they should.
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Varitek? Where does Bengie play then? Where will #1 draft pick Buster Posey play in 2010?
Furcal might be a bad move. If they also have a Cain for big bat trade.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM
And people wonder why the Giants are one of the most poorly ran franchises in baseball ...
What in the world will Tex bring to the team? Another handful of wins. Wow - the team can go from winning 72 games to winning 77. For my $90m that just isn't enough performance.
The Giants must rebuild. That means no more big FA contracts. They should be looking at moving Molina, Rowand and Winn right now. They need to seriously look at moving Cain and/or Lincecum.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 15, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Daveinexile
That's fine. We will keep him and make several more world series runs. You do realize though that by the time the giants have any semblance of an offense to contend cain will be long gone, right?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 15, 2008 at 01:10 PM
well actually Buster Posey will be in his first year, do you not understand that he will not need one year of professional ball and be a starting everyday C. He could come in june or so 2010, and then can share time with Varitek and also learn from him how to handle a MLB pitching staff.
Posted by: theJonathan | November 15, 2008 at 01:12 PM
by the way BJSguess, if they need to trade Lincecum, I would give them a birth right to one of my children.
Dumb post
Posted by: theJonathan | November 15, 2008 at 01:13 PM
What part of rebuilding means tearing down? "They need to seriously look at moving Cain and/or LIncecum"? You drank the crazy juice.
I'm not big on Tex, and I don't think the Giants have any hopes of getting him, because he'll want five or six years, but the Giants aren't a small market team. Their payroll was $30 or $40 million more just a few years ago. By signing a big bat at first, they could expect a home-run a week from that guy, strengthen their bench, add to their infield depth, and move Sandoval to third. I'd rather see Furcal settle in at short -- a position that the Giants can't fill within the organization, at least not adequately. As is, the Giants are already contenders for the NL West. The way they played the last month, with the new talent contributing, the rookies taking over, put them far ahead of where they were earlier in the year. And everyone else is selling or losing a load of talent. If the Giants signed Furcal, they'd be favorites for the division.
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 01:16 PM
BJG,
I'm ok with trading Cain for a bat...Lincecum stays. The current Cy Young winner who is in team control until 2012. You just don't trade that talent away.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 15, 2008 at 01:22 PM
here is my problem with trading Cain! What do you see as a need for this team that can get in a fair return? I can put Furcal at SS, or O-cab...Can sign Manny, Dunn, Ibanez for OF depth. Have Sandoval, Gillespie for Corner IF positions.
Am I going to get a stud 2B worth Cain? Nick Noonan will suffice
Posey in the pipeline for mid 2010.
Am I trading Pitching for Unprove pitching?
Posted by: theJonathan | November 15, 2008 at 01:29 PM
I think the only trade for Cain would be Prince + a decent prospect. That gives us a big bat and the prospect will even out the salary differential.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 15, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Hey where's SFG? I had fun hearing spout out a lot of nonsense yesterday...lol
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 01:58 PM
wow BJSguess,
are you kidding me with that post? Saying to solve our problems we should trade Lincecum? The one thing we had going for us last year.
Come on dude, either you don't follow baseball at all or your just stupid. Trading Lincecum is the absolutley last move I would ever do.
Trading Cain for power, yes, trading Lincecum for basically anything, no.
And don't post shi.t saying like, "if the cards offered Pujols straight up for him, you wouldn't take it??" Cause you know that will never happen.
Posted by: SFG55 | November 15, 2008 at 02:00 PM
wow fa.ggot as.s yanksfan. I hope you stayed up late last night researching cause you need to
Posted by: SFG55 | November 15, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Maybe the government will come in and bail Sabaen out on that Zito contract...haha.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Dude...you were so outmatched yesterday. The best comment you made was the "Noah Lowry would've been an all-star if he wasn't injures last year statment". Predicting that a guy who in 3 full seasons, to my knowledge, has NEVER BEEN an all-star would've have had an all-star worthy season IF he PLAYED the season was the BEST/WORST comment I ever heard. Thanks a lot dude. PLEASE GIVE ME MORE!!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Wow..that was really weird? I asked where's that shmuck SFG and then WHAM he appeared.
Hmmmmmmm...I wish Halle Berry were here with me right now. (Door bell rings)..... Darn it! It's only the pizza man. :)
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:09 PM
here is my problem with trading Cain! What do you see as a need for this team that can get in a fair return? I can put Furcal at SS, or O-cab...Can sign Manny, Dunn, Ibanez for OF depth. Have Sandoval, Gillespie for Corner IF positions.
Exactly when was the report that the Giants were increasing their payroll by 70-75 million PER year because I missed that one.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 15, 2008 at 02:10 PM
yanksfan,
would you have a problem if we traded the '27 Yanks for cain? that seems the only thing Giants fans might consider. If so, I'll get the shovels.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 15, 2008 at 02:11 PM
"Dude...you were so outmatched yesterday. The best comment you made was the "Noah Lowry would've been an all-star if he wasn't injures last year statment". Predicting that a guy who in 3 full seasons, to my knowledge, has NEVER BEEN an all-star would've have had an all-star worthy season IF he PLAYED the season was the BEST/WORST comment I ever heard. Thanks a lot dude. PLEASE GIVE ME MORE!!!"
HAHAHAHAH
you know what?
That's ALMOST as ludicrous as hyping Melky Cabrera as a starting center fielder with upside.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 15, 2008 at 02:16 PM
haha when did i say he would be an all star? I said he would've started. You asked who would've started and I said
Noah Lowry would've.
You put words in my mouth as.swipe. Show me my quote
Posted by: SFG55 | November 15, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Kenan and Kel:
Haha I'll give you that. Right your saying that because no one wanted to trade for Melky during the winter of 07-08 right? Haha...
And of course a 24 year old guy can't turn things around after a bad year?
______________________
Giants Interested In Melky Cabrera
By Tim Dierkes [May 5, 2007 at 10:22pm CST]
According to Peter Gammons in his blog, the Giants are considering shopping a starting pitcher. Not only do they have Tim Lincecum debuting tomorrow, but Jonathan Sanchez was raised mostly as a starter and hasn't worked out in the bullpen so far.
Gammons says the Giants would target a young position player, and they like Melky Cabrera of the Yankees. He does not think the Yankees would be interested in a Cabrera for Noah Lowry swap. If it was the Lowry of 2005, it would be a different story. But the southpaw seems to have lost his strikeout rate at age 26.
The Giants could also peddle Matt Morris, who's 4-1 with a 3.20 ERA. This is probably the high point of Morris's season, so shopping him makes sense. The Orioles are one of several teams in need of an innings eater.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:28 PM
hey thejonathan,
Im not sure if your a giants fan or live in the bay area, so you could read sfgate, but the giants in years past have failed miserably when they platoon a top young position player with someone older, i.e. todd linden. Besides why would sabean spend posada money on Varitek when we have Molina for one more year and Posey the year after that?
Honestly think.
Posted by: AriGoldisaG | November 15, 2008 at 02:28 PM
or...
Melky Cabrera To Braves?
By Tim Dierkes [December 16, 2006 at 11:16am CST]
Ken Davidoff of Newsday has amended yesterday's Melky for Mike Gonzalez rumor. The latest one is Melky Cabrera to Atlanta, Mike Gonzalez to the Yankees, and Adam LaRoche to Pittsburgh. See, everyone's happy. Melky could handle LF for the Braves in 2007 and then switch to center after that.
Davidoff mentions that such a deal could pave the way for one more year of Bernie Williams. Not sure if the Bucs could get more, but I think snagging LaRoche and his 35 HR potential would be a fine return. LaRoche would still have three years of service time under the Pirates' control. The team could return to contention in 2008 if the young pitchers come along.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:29 PM
My comments are being blocked??
Anyway, I couldn't find the quote but I'll take your word for it. You said so many dumb things yesterday I may have just assumed that the comment was par for the course.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Haha...and you what else is funny, we won 17 more games than you.
Also, you know what else is funny?
Sidney Ponson and Darrel Rasner gaves us more wins and fewer losses combined (13-15) @ 1.4 mill total as opposed to Zito who you paid $15 mil for a 10-17 record.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 03:01 PM
ok scoreboard correction:
Yanksfansince78- 10 wins
SFG55: 1 win
PLAY ON!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Clearly some of you are hung over from Friday night becuase some of these comments are way out there.
Posted by: kdub | November 15, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Yeah Pettite gave us 14 wins on a 1 year deal for $16 mil. Did he have an off year? Yes but 14 wins is 14 wins, 200 inning and a 4.54 era in the AL for a #2 guy isn't horrible. But Zito so far has a record of 21-30 and you are committed to paying him another $103 million over the next 5 million...(Sigh) Zito...the gift that keeps on giving. Sort of like herpes.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 03:16 PM
And to all SF fans, let me apologize. I actually like some of the players on your team and admire your young pitchers like Lincey, Cain and Sanchez but this guy SFG is a little snot who invaded a board on the Yanks and CC and began making rants on how bad a team we are and how we are the reason all is wrong in the world when in fact each huge contract signing a smaller market team makes that turns out to be a bad deal (see Zito, Hampton, Schmidt, Silva, Washburn, etc) sets a precedent for the REAL top pitchers like Santana, CC, Peavy, etc the following years. The only guy that we've signed to a lenghty big money contract in recent years was Mussina when we signed him to that 6 yr/88 mil deal and he deserved it and earned it.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 03:21 PM
And that Zito comment should've read $103 mill over the next 5 years.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 03:22 PM
The Giants need to sign Furcal, 10 mil could end up being a bargain and they have nothing coming up in the system at shortstop. That leaves room to sign a couple solid relief pitchers and then it would be worth it to make a trade for Adrian Beltre who costs a reasonble 12 mil and hes still only going to be like 30 years old for the season. I'm not sure what it would take but the M's need OF and Winn ($9) would fit with a couple solid prospects not even including Sanchez /Bum /Alderson. That keeps the rotation intact and brings in two big bats while making the left side of the infield one of the better ones in baseball. Look at what Beltre did in his last contract year in the NL. Then let him go at the end of the season and get a couple draft picks and hopefully Gillaspie, or Villalona or someone is almost ready.
Posted by: SFg49w | November 15, 2008 at 03:41 PM
I See the Giants signing C.C. Sabathia, then trading Cain to atlanta for Yunel Escobar, (Moving Buriss to second) Gorkys Hernandez (outfielder)and both Blaine Boyer and Charlie Morton (Two major league ready pitchers. My only problem with this is the number of left handed starters we'd have.
Posted by: CaptBIGdog | November 15, 2008 at 06:28 PM
Why the f--k are the Giants interested in Furcal? Seriously. They need to be rebuilding. Trade Winn, bring up Schierholtz.
He will NOT be coming at 10MM/yr. Trust me. There are enough teams in the bidding for Furcal that that will not be happening, even that team down the Bay will be bidding if Brian Sabean/Ned Colletti/someone else doesn't decide to offer him four years.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 15, 2008 at 06:55 PM
Schierholtz will be on the opening day roster. He's out of options. The only question is does he start.
The Giants are rebuilding, but when you're rebuilding in a blighted neighborhood -- at a time when people are selling, not buying -- it's easy to move into win-now stage. So long as they set themselves up for 2010, don't handcuff themselves by doing anything to win in 2009, they're all good.
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 07:09 PM
SFG55 wrote:
Don't you find it ridiculous that the Yankees are in the running for... EVERYONE.
They plan on offering contracts to
Sabathia
Burnett
Lowe
Teixeira
Now they want Peavy too??
When most teams make a big signing its like the biggest news, everyone's excited..
When the Yankees sign someone, its like.. yawn Sabathia.. yawn Peavy..
______________________
I don't think that any realistic Yankee fan expects them to field a rotation line up that includes:
CC, Burnett, Lowe, Peavy and Tex.
CC and one of the 3 other pitchers definetly possible. Tex I think will be a good possibility if his price comes down to earth. However, if it does come down then I think it makes it more likely for him to return to the Angels. I seriously think that's why Swish was picked up. Gives us a solution for 09 and in winter of 09 we can look at picking up Andy LaRoche and moving Swish to LF or keep Swish at 1B and go after a corner OF. I think it was a really good forward thinking move made by Cash.
As far as Peavy is concerned I seriously think Cash wouldn't want to part with whatever Towers would demand. I think he happens if and only if CC falls thru. I would love the Yanks to go with:
CC
Wang
Oliver Perez/Burnett
Joba
Hughes
If we cant get either Perez or Burnett I'd rather bring back Mussina or Pettite rather than signing Lowe. If we go with a staff of CC, Wang, Perez, Joba and Hughes that gives us a staff with every pitcher under 30 and under control for the next 3 to 4 years.
1B-Tex
2B-Cano
SS-Jeter
3B-Arod
LF-Damon
CF-Melky/Gardner
RF-Nady
DH-Matsui
C-Posada
That happens and our payroll would not increase past this years amount.
$80 mil off replaced by CC @ $25, Tex @ $22, Burnett/Perez @ $15-$17 mil and Swish's $5 mil. That's $69 mil. With $11 mil left to possibly put towards Man-NY......just kidding.
And in winter of 09 we will lose another $25 mil off the books when we let Damon and matsui walk. Then Arod, Jeter and Posada will be our only position players over 30.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 07:55 PM
Signing C.C. Sabthia, would start a chain of events similar to this for the SF Giants,
1) Sign Sabathia
2) Trade Cain to Atlanta for Yunel Escobar, Gorkys Hernandez, Blaine Boyer and Charlie Morton.
3) Dump Rowland. (Maybe to Chi white sox for a prospect).
4) Trade Lowery and Two prospects (6th thru 10th rated) to Seattle for Adrian Beltre.
5) Sign two relief pitchers.
2009 Line up would be as follows:
Yunel Escobar SS
Randy Winn CF
Fred Lewis LF
Adrian Beltre 3B
Pablo Sandoval 1B
Nate Schierholtz RF
Bengie Molina C
Emmanuel Burriss 2B
T Lincecum
C.C. Sabthia
B. Zito
J. Sanchez
B. Boyer / C. Morton
We should end up with a YOUNGER, FASTER AND BETTER DEFENSIVE team, that is within payroll expectations without sacrificing the future.
Posted by: CaptBIGdog | November 15, 2008 at 08:11 PM
I really think the Giants should spring for a big bat. The west is very week now that you have the Padres and Rockies rebuilding and the Dbacks not really doing much. I think with the Giants pitching a couple of bats (Abreu, Dunn or Tex) could make a difference.
1B- TEX
2B- HUDSON
SS-BURRIS
3B-SANDOVAL
C-MOLINA
LF-LEWIS
CF-ROWAND
RF-WINN
Would you guys consider trading Molina (since there's a lack of C available) moving Sandoval to C and maybe going after a guy like Beltre? You can probably pick up something good for Molina.
The pitching staff is strong with:
Lincey
Cain
Sanchez
Lowry (if healthy)
Zito (if you can squeeze 12 wins out of him that would be a blessing).
Mayve even look at a guy like Randy Johnson, Pedro martinez or Randy Wolf to give a little more vet leadership and depth to the rotation?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 15, 2008 at 08:18 PM
For the Red Sox to be a dynasty, don't they have to keep winning, like the Yankees once did? Just checking. Cuz I thought they lost to the Devil Rays.
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 09:09 PM
the giants could be very dangerous with a CC.
lincecum
cc
cain
zito - wooooo!
lowry/i honestly cant think of their pitching
thats pretty darn good
if cain puts up more mediocre numbers next year i think it might be time to say hes another just good arm in the league.
but the only way they make a push for the 85 win marker is with 2 fresh bats in the lineup.
the dodgers and dbacks have to much talent not to battle for that division
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 15, 2008 at 10:28 PM
661dodgerblue --
Kevin Pucetas is in the running to be a 5th starter. http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Kevin%20Pucetas&pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=501879
Posted by: The Management | November 15, 2008 at 11:19 PM
themanagement
thanks i saw him pitch a couple times this year. i think they go with someone a bit more seasoned
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 16, 2008 at 04:03 AM
Phil champs: It is not a give Cain will be gone. The Giant have fair amount of revenue and as years move on they have less debt from building the park. Also by all accounts he likes it here.
The other thing is just near average Offense and a tick above average D will pill up a lot of wins with those two guys. I went through the 70’s Giants I know bad teams. I like our odds with these two arms at the front of the staff. It could crash an burn or we might end up with some thing really special. That baseball.
As for the current payroll . Just what is worth bumping the payroll right now? Say the Giants gain 10 win from 30MM bump we are still 500 team and have a lot of holes. Best bet is to still see what we have and wait for moves that fit. Not moves that kind of sort of fit - if you use a hammer long enough.
One last think thanks for getting I am not hating On Howard. If just doesn’t seem to a move that helps the Giants make any head way.
Posted by: daveinexile | November 16, 2008 at 08:44 AM
I See the Giants signing C.C. Sabathia, then trading Cain to atlanta for Yunel Escobar, (Moving Buriss to second) Gorkys Hernandez (outfielder)and both Blaine Boyer and Charlie Morton (Two major league ready pitchers. My only problem with this is the number of left handed starters we'd have.
Ok I realize that you're not the person that shot down my proposal of Howard for Cain but you're proposal from the Braves (the 4th best shortstop in the NL East (worst if you think Christian Guzman is better which is debatable) a PROSPECT and two middling pitchers. OR the person who has a shot tomorrow to have won 2 of the last 3 MVP's and puts up offensive statistics rivaled by AROD and Babe Ruth and not many others. To me that's silly.
If you want to argue that you'll need more than that and balance I could be persuaded to agree with that, but as far as pure impact, Howard would have much more impact.
Daveinexile,
I agree with the don't overspend on the biggest names. By all accounts championships aren't built on the big signings in the beginning of free agency. Its the later, strategic moves that usually end up paying dividends. I know (Thome/David Bell) or Lidge trade. I know which one I prefer now.
Someone earlier suggested bringing in Furcal and Manny and Dunn and Ibanez. First off there is no way that all would happen.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 16, 2008 at 09:40 AM
661dodgerblue,
Yeah, I think they'll go with someone else too. I hope Lowry will be the guy, or a free agent like Penny even. But I hear Pucetas is the first who'll make the jump. It's good to see he's killing in winter leagues -- that's his first sustained action against guys in higher levels. Pablo raking in the Venezuela Winter Leagues as well -- even better numbers than any he had earlier in the year, an OPS of 1.1-something.
Posted by: The Management | November 16, 2008 at 11:00 AM
PhilsChamps: On the Furcal, Manny, etc pie in the sky thing. I think the biggest reason for this kind of talk is for the last 30-40 years if the Giants are making noise its because the have good offense and defense. The arms are usually serviceable at best with 1-2 having stand out years. It’s the model a sizable chunk of Giants fans are use to.
SFG: What you are saying is basically he got the Matt Cain offense support. And the 30 year old vet folded under the pressure. Not trying to hate on He Who Shall Not Be Named as much as give outsiders an idea why Cain is so well regarded by the Giants fans.
Posted by: daveinexile | November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Hey Red Sox D,
Why don't you head back to where you came from. We are on here talking sports and you got jokes about gays going on? Thats low class and unnecassary. When you got something that shows baseball knowledge to say, then come back.
Posted by: YounGuns | November 17, 2008 at 12:30 PM
With C.C. the Giants would have by far the best 1-2 in the game. I doubt they pull that trigger but I would enjoy seeing that.
PhilsWSchamps: I would no doubt take Howard straight up for Cain. He, Dunn and Fielder(who I guess they turned down as well) have the most power in the league. They are three guys who I believe would not have to worry about a power outage. Any one of the three would get the guys around them better pitches, and make them better, in essence making the team a hell of a lot better.
Posted by: YounGuns | November 17, 2008 at 12:46 PM