MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Do Angels Have Genuine Interest In Manny? | Main | Jays' Plans Start With Burnett »

Kevin Gregg Trade Reactions

The Cubs acquired one year of reliever Kevin Gregg for six of Jose Ceda yesterday.  Chicago teams apparently went 0 for 2 yesterday, as the reactions favor the Marlins.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535f55d70970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kevin Gregg Trade Reactions:

Comments

Like the Cubs fans didn't feel bad enough already yesterday...

Talk about a bad day for Chicago Baseball...

Although it seems incredibly stupid to throw ceda at the marlins, I still have faith in hendry this winter. After the harden deal my perception of him totally changed. All summer we heard how "worthless" murton/patterson/gallagher etc. were and he still used them to put the cubs in excellent playoff position. I think he can pull something out.

msk86,

Hendry is good except when he trades pitching to the Marlins.

Seriously though...this trade wasn't good. We could have done better with Ceda...he was a top 3 prospect of ours that BP ranked as a 4 star. I still think he has work to do, and he will, but yesterday wasn't a good start.

Very true, but it's a long offseason. I'd love to see furcal/roberts in a cub uni next year and they can definitely make that happen.

Looks to me to be a trade made out of desperation after Hendry decided he didn't want to pony up for Wood. I like Kerry, but think what he is going to be paid should not have been paid by the Cubs. He has to have something up his sleeve with regards to Marmol to make this deal, becasue i doubt Lou would want a rookie or young kid in the closer role all season long.

Plus this just goes along with a couple friends thinking that Hendry can only swing good deals when another team is in a dump mode, i.e. Lee, A-ram/Lofton, Harden. Has he been able to close a deal for a real player where he didn't end up on the short end or overpay?

One would have to think that he SHOULD have been able to close the Roberts deal last year and if he REALLY wanted Peavy that would be a done deal already also.

Gregg has good stuff but he isnt a shut down closer like Wood. Though personally, I think he will be a set up man with Marmol as the closer.

They didnt want Wood back at his asking price of 10mil per season because theyre obviously looking to spend that money elsewhere and why not when you have a guy like Marmol already groomed to take over.

Why not just sign Jose Cruz, who is better, and keep Ceda?

Why not just go into '09 with Ceda, who is better, in the bullpen or as a May callup?

The funny thing is, Ceda was untouchable in the Brian Roberts discussions last year but suddenly he's available for Kevin Gregg...????????

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/02/orioles-asked-f.html

I don't really mind adding Gregg to save money rather than signing Kerry, but giving up Ceda to do it was just awful.

Ceda could very well end up being just as good as Gregg as soon as this season, and his upside as a reliever is huge. The Marlins likely wouldve dealt him for less, and he's simply not worth Ceda regardless.

As far as I can see, this move alone is a simply awful trade. I think it's obviously part of some bigger plan though, I just really up Hendry didn't screw up by getting so little for Ceda.

the reality of the cubs is closer to the playoff team than the regular season.
the reality of hendry is closer to the guy that signs off a soriano deal than the guy that signs off a derosa deal.
hendry can't afford wood because he still has to pay out the lilly and marquis contracts.

unless you got hermida with gregg this is an unspeakably ridiculous trade.
really - trading anything other than an eric patterson-type for gregg is overpaying.
then again, does the cubs system have even any patterson types left??

I would've figured the number one reaction would've been, "Who is Kevin Gregg?"

The reactions would be wrong...

CAIRO projections Gregg and Wood to be almost equal to one another next year. Ceda has potential (and control issues) They got a pitcher who is more of a sure thing for that and he’ll only make around $4 million. They traded Wood’s future contract of about $12 million per year for a player who is almost as good a him for $4 million. And, the Cubs get two more draft picks before the 2nd Round of next June's draft.

This was a very good trade, as far as it concerns the Cubs. It was also a very good trade for the Marlins (sometimes it works out like that)

No Indy,

1st off, Wood has a way higher K rate, lower walk rate, and lower hit rate than Kevin Gregg. What is CAIRO projecting on? Wood in his career as a whole or Wood as a reliever? He proved to be dominant and more consistent as a reliever. I don't you'll find anybody else compare Wood and Gregg as equals in 2009.

Regardless, the uproar on the move is giving up a guy who is better and passing up other guys who would cost the same and be better for Kevin Gregg.

This was a really bad trade, even in any big picture scenario you see fit.

Letting Wood walk isn't really a bad idea...you save the money and get the draft picks. Thats the good part.

The bad part is that we had to rid ourselves of Jose Ceda to do it, and netted Kevin Gregg. As Teetz pointed out earlier...why not spend give Cruz a 3/12 contract and keep Ceda, and put them BOTH in the pen next year. Or, Package Ceda and Pie and it should definitely net you Brian Giles (assuming he approves the trade). Anyway...we lost our biggest trade chip outside of Josh Vitters for a reliever that we could have had for nothing but money.

I will like this trade better if Gregg ends up netting us two draft picks after this year.

I don't know what Cairo is basing their projections on, but you'll be hard pressed to find anybody in baseball say Kevin Gregg will be the equal of Kerry Wood in 2009. 1st off, Wood's has much better stuff than Gregg as the numbers indicate.

Wood had a much higher K rate, much lower walk rate, and similar hit rate.

Secondly, I'm definitely not debating the quality of gaining payroll flexibility, the draft picks, nor avoiding the risk of Wood's injury history. What I am in an uproar about is trading away a guy 10 years younger who has a good chance to outperform the guy he was trade for....straight up! In addition, there were a variety of ways Hendry could have gone to acquire a set-up man on the cheap who will likely outperform Kevin Gregg. As I mentioned previously, Juan Cruz fits this bill. Jeremy Affeldt is another. Basically anybody that would have cost less than Wood.

This wasnt a bad trade. The Cubs have a 1-2 year window to win the WS. They also plan to use the Wood 10-13mm for a RFer. This was a solid move. Gregg and Samardja can now setup for Marmol. Ceda had promise, but as we all know, prospects are just that....prospects. He has Farnsworth written all over him. Solid, safe move by Hendry.

Just to ask Cubs fans, do you think that Marmol is ready to close next year? I've seen him pitch many times in the past two years and he just appears to be a marvel to me. I know Kerry Wood has a great reputation in Chicago but I wouldn't necessarily feel uncomfortable with having Marmol closing out games for the next few years if I were a Cubs fan. I think he's ready enough to allow yourself to NOT throw all that money at Wood.

"The bad part is that we had to rid ourselves of Jose Ceda to do it, and netted Kevin Gregg. As Teetz pointed out earlier...why not spend give Cruz a 3/12 contract and keep Ceda, and put them BOTH in the pen next year."

This is literally exactly what I thought. Like exactly. I don't mind letting Wood walk to save money, I get that.

What I don't get though, is moving Ceda, who is close to being a very good reliever and still has all seven of his years of team control, for Gregg, a very reliever with one year of team control. When you consider that Ceda could also easily become a far better reliever than Gregg, this deal just simply made no sense.

I totally get that the Cubs are playing for today, and I'm also fine with giving up prospects to accomplish that. But it needs to be sensible. Why not just let Wood walk, sign a Affeldt/Cruz, and then not trade Ceda? Ceda could've very well have pulled a Shark and came up and lit it up from the bullpen. Or at the very least, try and get more for Ceda than just Gregg. Why not package him with guys like Pie and Cedeno, who sort of need to be moved anyways? This move just completely puzzles me.

Wood is a shutdown closer? ROFLZ. He is solid and better than Gregg though.

"Wood is a shutdown closer? ROFLZ. He is solid and better than Gregg though."

Wood is a shutdown closer. Just ask Keith Law:

"Wood is the best reliever available on the market this winter, even if he didn't set any records. He works primarily with two pitches, a mid-90s four-seamer with good life and a low-80s slider with a very sharp, late break. His control took a huge leap forward in 2008, and he commands both pitches well, changing hitters' eye levels by working up with the fastball and down with the slider... However, for a one-inning, shutdown closer, you're not going to do much better than Wood if you can stomach the health risk."

Clearly, Wood is a stud, and the Cubs will miss him. To act as if his loss is small, would be silly.

Kieth Law in his 50 top FA's has Wood rated abouve K-rod and Fuentes. He certainly is shut down. I watched him pitch last year, he has some pretty sick stuff.

I'm going to miss Kerry Wood. Although, he did miss a lot of time over the years and Gregg is cheaper. And the Cubs weren't able to give Wood what he wanted. So instead of going year to year with Wood Hendry would keep his former player/ friend happy.

MattyMets - I don't really think Marmol is ready just yet, he is still to erratic at times. he has the stuff, but right now is more important to us being able to go 1-2 innings when we need him to.

I am not upset they are letting wood go but they could have gotten some fringe prospect tossed in there on the deal.

by letting Wood get the deal he deserves. Hendry could make up by getting Brian Roberts or Bobby Abreu.

I don't like the trade either, but I wouldn't exactly call it a "heist". You're getting a major league closer who opponents batted .205 against for the last 2 years in the ML's, he's stranded 32 of 36 inherited runners and is will only cost around $3M.

It would be very optimistic to think Ceda would be major league ready and as effective as Gregg in '09.

Hendry is obviously willing to sacrifice the future to have the best chance of winning in '09 which I don't mind the philosophy at all.

I cannot possibly see how we can trade for Roberts, so let's not start that again. Last year they wanted Ceda, think they're looking for Gregg this year?

I also don't know about us getting Abreu. I'd rather spend the 15M that Abreu would get and sign Furcal and trade for Hermida.

That'd give us a potential power bat in left field, and a switch hitting leadoff man with great speed and better defense than theriot. It gives us left handed bats of Furcal, Hermida and Fukudome and gives us more flexibility.

I dunno... I still don't like this trade.

When Wood can control the slider, which he did last year, he is downright filthy. The pitch is thrown at 88 mph, which is the speed of a lot of guys fastballs. He was hitting 98 with the fastball...I mean, what else do you want in a closer if he isn't the shutdown type?

His BB/K ration blows K-Rods away, and they have vitually identical BAA and Opponents OPS stats.

Lidge, Rivera, and Soria were all better...but thats about it.

** Right field

Hendry got slammed by many for shelling out sizable multiyear contracts to guys like Howry and Eyre.

I suspect many of those same folks are now back carping about how Hendry should've gone out and signed a Cruz/Affeldt type instead of trading for Gregg.

And of course they'd be the same ones slamming Hendry if he had done none of the above, leaving Cubs' bullpen weaker next year.

I think Cubs fans should just SIMMMMMER for a second. Obviously if the Cubs are burning some salary, theyre also planning to sign or trade for a big name of some sort.

Personally I think they could use another power bat and there's also the Peavy trade possibility.

I am really surprised with the backlash against Hendry regarding this deal. Once the decision was made not to sign Wood & Howry (i am assuming), you needed a proven arm in the bullpen with Smarz & Marmol. I think to suggest they just go out and sign Cruz or Affeldt is assuming Hendry has the money to sign somebody to a long term deal when he just may not. For the first time in years you heard Hendry mention payroll contraints yesterday.

Gregg is a good picther - he is not great but his b/a againt the last two years is .205. Yes his walk ratio is a bit too high but you take out September of 08' when he was injured and he has been a solid picther the last two years - which i think makes him a pretty good bet for a third.

Not a fan of the Trade. Gregg is set up guy not a closer on a team expected to contend. I hope that Marmol is ready to step up and be the guy. I would have liked to keep wood. He would have given the home team discount. Btu with the FA closers on the market he may end up coming back to us. Guess we will see. I think unfortunatly it was necessary but I am not enamored with the FA lefty bats.

Wood is better than Gregg so this tells me it's a payroll move. I thought the Cubs were working without a payroll budget??

Does Gregg become a FA after next season? My bigest beef is Ceda has no mlb time and we gave him up for 1 season of Gregg. I would think that we could have used Ceda for a deal for Street. He cant become a FA until 2011 I believe. But.. his Salary numbers are going up as well.

-Gregg is a FA after 09

-whats the love fest for Hermida? Hermida doesnt excite me. He had 502abs and hit .249avg with a 323obp. 17hr and 61rbi's isnt that impressive. Hes a young Jaque Jones....

-Say NO to Abreu, hes an expensive DeRosa that hits left handed.

Hermida is only 24 and shows some pretty significant home/road splits -- his career OPS is 100 points higher away from Dolphins Stadium.

The guy's got a lot of talent and could really blossom if he plays his prime years in a more favorable hitter's park.

"Hermida is only 24 and shows some pretty significant home/road splits -- his career OPS is 100 points higher away from Dolphins Stadium."

I agree with this. Turn his home park from extreme pitchers park to Wrigley, and I think he goes .270/.350


"-Gregg is a FA after 09"

This isn't a bad thing. If we let him go, which i believe is the plan, there is a good chance he is a type B or even A free agent, right? One or two more picks would be nice.

Like Howry now, the Cubs would be better off if Gregg winds up a B than an A.

Gregg is an A right now...and pretty high up there, probably due to saves. But, next years rankings will go by 2008 and 2009. His 08 was pretty darned good (relatively speaking), so there is actually a pretty decent chance he ends up an A.

As long as he performs well, I think I'd be alright offering him ARB after this year...chances are he will be a setup man and won't make more than like 4 mil on a one year deal if he accepts...right? or am I missing something here...

With Howry...he would be lucky to get the 1 year deal at that money because people figured out that he throws one pitch.

I really hate the move for the cubs...gregg is going to get a big raise through arbitration, and holding out for a few weeks would have probably dropped the price significantly. I can't imagine any other team offered anything half as good as that.

"Say NO to Abreu, hes an expensive DeRosa that hits left handed."

I've seen this a few times now, lofty praise for Derosa and undervaluing Abreu.

Last season was the first time Derosa out performed Abreu and it wasn't by much. Abreu k's less, walks more, steals more and hits for more power. I'd agree Derosa should remain a Cub because of his versatility and price tag but Abreu is clearly the superior offensive player.

I agree with Kenan...maybe DeRosa was comparable in his best year ever...but Abreu is consistantly a high OBP type of guy that the Cubs would love. I just don't like his pricetag...

"The guy's got a lot of talent and could really blossom if he plays his prime years in a more favorable hitter's park."

How does a ballpark have anything to do with how a player "blossoms"?

"Last season was the first time Derosa out performed Abreu and it wasn't by much. Abreu k's less, walks more, steals more and hits for more power. I'd agree Derosa should remain a Cub because of his versatility and price tag but Abreu is clearly the superior offensive player."

DeRosa:.376obp, 21hrs
Abreu:371obp, 20hrs, sure he stole 22 bags but got caught 11 times. Not a good ratio. They are very similar players. Abreu isnt worth the 13-155mm he will get.

I'm sure Abreu is worth a less, and DeRosa is worth more...but you aren't going to find guys that hit like DeRo has for the Cubs on the market for 4 to 5 mil a year. Hendry made an awesome signing that year...along with the Lilly one as well.

"They are very similar players. Abreu isnt worth the 13-155mm he will get."

Ooh .005 obp advantage and 1 more home run. Abreu still walks more, hits for higher average, strikes out less and slugs a higher percentage, hell he even has more win shares. Derosa out produced him by .014 in ops in his career year.

Again, because of his versatility and price tag he is the more appealing option, but Abreu is undoubtedly the superior offensive player.

Why are the Marlins just so good?

Somehow I get the feeling Abreu is not the top choice for Hendry.

As far as the trade, I am not that down on it like most everyone else. Ceda looks to be a good one and time will tell if that holds up. It stings now, but let's wait before we call this a bad Hendry trade. Money had to be moved...or not resigned. Obviously, the Cubs budget and market is not what some thought.

Its clear Hendry didnt think Ceda would help the team next year, so he went and got a guy that could as well as saved money from not signing wood so that we could use that money for an upgrade in RF. We have a small window to win. We are playing for 2009, not 2011. Point is, Ceda cant help us win a WS next year where Gregg can. We can always turn around and trade Gregg at the deadline for another Ceda type player....its a win for the cubs. Also, keep in mind Gregg should be a type A FA next year, so if we lose him, we get 2 draft picks.

I think Hendry has done a great job, but I dont understand this! If Woody wanted to stay and would have accepted a 1yr contract, why not sign him again!! His job as a GM is to put the best team out there, I dont see how this makes the Cubs better. Gregg is good, but c'mon! Imagine Gregg pitching the 7th, then Marmol in the 8th. our starting pitchers would only have to pitch 6 innings, and between Gregg,Gaudin,Cotts,Samardzja (hope I spelled that right) I think we could get 9 more outs! I dont like this move at all! GOOD LUCK WOODY!!

yo cubs fans,
97 wins deludes that this is a flawed lineup that could just as easily fall apart as click

if it's all about 2009, how does that explain trading one of your few chips for a guy that could just as easily be non-tendered

ted lilly at $10-12 mill at ridiculous market rates is not an awful signing, but it is far, far from "awesome"

clarknaddison: did you really ask "what does a ballpark have to do with how a player 'blossoms'?"
apparently you've never heard of sammy sosa. or larry walker. or ryan howard. or barry zito. or ...

Cubs Front Office=FAIL

i always find it interesting how everyone is a GM but do not have a clue how it works. the trade was not Woods for Gregg, the trade was woods at 10 mil a year for gregg at 4.5 mil. thus the real trade is woods for gregg plus what 6 mil a year can buy in the market, i.e. either Johnson and or a left handed bat. So assuming they want Johnson, the real trade was gregg and johnson for woods, now how does that sound? A steal of course for the Cubs. Gregg saved a lot of games and i watched him last year, he has a live fastball and without the knee problem, he would have saved 35 games. Ceda is not ready yet...by the time he is, the Cubs will be a new team. Let Hendry finish his off season and then you will see the real plan and how this trade was sensational. Also just wait until you watch Greg pitch without pain and you will understand all. They will have a super pen and either Johnson in the rotation or Peavy and a left handed bat for about the same as they would have spent with Wood and the free agents from last year. The team will improve.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.