![]() |
|
|
| |
« Which Team Will Sign Rafael Furcal? | Main | Phillies Sign Mike Koplove »
Happy Thanksgiving! Here are some links to snack on before the big meal.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105361ecbc2970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds and Ends: Blue Jays, Dodgers, Dunn:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I think the market for Dunn will begin to develop after it becomes clearer where Teixeira is going.
Other than Tex and Manny, Dunn is probably the best power threat available, and some team will bite because of his talents. I think some teams are also hesitant because there is an abundance of cheaper options on the market for power hitting 1B/OF types: Teixeira, Dunn, Giambi, Abreu, Burrell, Manny, Bradley, etc.
Once some of those guys sign, Dunn's high OBP and power will become appealing enough to someone, even if that's all he offers.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM
** there is an abundance of options.
None of those guys will come very cheap.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM
No wonder it's eirly quiet. I hear that Dunn doesn't even like playing baseball.
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 27, 2008 at 12:00 PM
yeah, if i'm dunn i wait until the last minute to sign. i wait until CC signs, Tex signs, Manny signs, Furcal signs, all the major offensive players sign/get traded. then someone will need him and he'll get 5 years, close to 90 mil.
Posted by: minnesotawins | November 27, 2008 at 12:08 PM
After the nationals fail to sign tex the will jump on dunn so fast he won't know what hit him.
Posted by: Dj 26 | November 27, 2008 at 12:16 PM
I don't know why anyone thought the Jays would have the same amount of money to spend this year. Unless Rogers was willing to give them a 20%+ budget increase the drop in the dollar would obviously leave them with less to spend.
Did anyone really believe they would get another $20+ million to play with this year? I certainly didn't.
Posted by: tbk104 | November 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM
I want to say that Dunn will go to Washington, but there is just no room for him there.
They already have Johnson, Milledge, Dukes, Willingham, Kearns, Pena and Young to fill the three outfield spots and first base, they really just have no room for him.
Even if they deal Nick Johnson, they'll likely go with Willingham at first and an outfield of Kearns, Milledge and Dukes. I just don't think it would be a logical move, although Bowden will likely ponder making the move anyways.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM
"Did anyone really believe they would get another $20+ million to play with this year? I certainly didn't."
Ha ha! After the way J.P. wasted the money he was given last year, he's lucky he has a job let alone an increased budget. LOL LOL LOL.
Posted by: XCal1bur | November 27, 2008 at 12:36 PM
By the way tbk104, I wasn't calling you out or anything. I just agree with everything you said. I was only adding my 2c.
L8r.
Posted by: XCal1bur | November 27, 2008 at 12:37 PM
I would take Blue Jays budget talks with a grain of salt.
When the dollar was up, the potential salary they could've used, wasn't.
I think they are where they should be and their payroll should remain the same barring any further excuses.
The thing with Rogers is that having the Blue Jays losing money isn't that big of a deal, when your revenue is 12 billion.
Posted by: achengy | November 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Please Dodgers, DO SOMETHING!!
We are going to miss out on everyone.
Posted by: Sullenladyblue | November 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM
There's nothing eerie about it, Dunn is down the list but as it was already mentioned, wait until the guys ahead of him on the chart get nabbed.
I see Dunn as an asset but I wouldnt give him more than 10-12 million and I sure as hell wouldnt put him in the outfield. He's at 1st base or he's a DH, nothing more.
The only outfield Adam Dunn should see is when he watches a ball go over it because he has the foot speed of the stay puffed marshmellow man.
Posted by: xethicx | November 27, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Adam Dunn equation:
bad economy + bad baseball player = lack of interest.
As far as the Washingotn Nationals go, when did logic get in the way of Jim "Leathrepants" Bowden doing the right thing?
After him talking about bringing big name players in, like Texieiera and then missing out on them, he is going to have to get a "name" guy. With Dunn being a "name" and, more importantly, an ex-Reds player, it makes perfect sense for Bowden to sign Dunn, even if the Nationals already have six Outfielders.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 27, 2008 at 01:00 PM
I think the Giants will get Dunn especially if they miss out on Furcal.
Dunn would provide that big bat the Giants need in the middle of the order
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 27, 2008 at 01:02 PM
If I had to rank the 1B/OF FAs defensively, here's how it would go.
Teixeira
---HUGE DROP---
Dunn (please put him at 1B), and he gets closer to the drop wall)
Burrell
Manny
Abreu
Giambi
(left Bradley off b/c injury concerns should relegate him to DH).
Posted by: melonis rex | November 27, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Good call on Dunn to the Giants, he would be a good fit for them at first base, if they're okay with awful defense in the infield (assuming Sandoval played third). Or maybe they move Rowand or Winn to stick Dunn in the outfield. Either way, he seems like the type of guy the Giants would go after this offseason in an attempt to bulk up the lineup short term.
And ctownboy,
I think calling Adam Dunn a bad baseball player is very unfair. Bad baseball players don't consistently post .380+ OBP's with 40 home runs, even if they don't bring anything else to the table.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 01:14 PM
I wonder if the Mets can pry Dukes away from the Nats.
Posted by: enut | November 27, 2008 at 01:24 PM
I wonder if the Mets can pry Dukes away from the Nats.
Uh.....no.
Posted by: tolo316 | November 27, 2008 at 02:08 PM
scribbletone, I agree that the Giants may make a play for Dunn after the Tex derby plays out, but other teams will then jump in and offer more money. Plus, Dunn may not be wild about Phone Booth Park because he knows it swallows up his moonshots like no other park does.
I think in the end, other teams will outbid the Giants for Tex and Dunn, and the team will then be left with figuring out if they want to go with Ishi/Phelps for 1B and Sandoval for 3B, or perhaps make a play for someone like Beltre for 3B and go with Sandoval for 1B.
Much of it may spin around whether or not they get a real upgrade at SS like Furcal, and we should know about that by the middle of next week.
Posted by: Buck Henry | November 27, 2008 at 02:18 PM
scribbletone,
The ONLY reason Dunn hits 40 Home Runs a year is because of the park he plays in. Bill James, the SABR guru who nows works for the Red Sox, has said that Great American Small Park aids Left Handed hitters' power numbers by 28%.
In 2008, while with the Reds, Dunn hit a Home RUn once in 11.09 At Bats. After he was traded to the D-backs, that dropped to once in every 18 At Bats. Over a 525 At Bat season, that means his Home Runs would drop from 47 to 29.
Considering Dunn had 521 At Bats in 2007 and 517 At Bats in 2008 and considering what type of hitter Dunn is, if he isn't playing in a bandbox then 32 Home Runs and 85 RBI's should be all that you can expect out of Dunn.
As far as On Base Percentage goes, big deal. He has no speed, so stealing bases, going from First to Third and scoring from First on Doubles aren't a big threat. This means the Pitchers and Defense aren't going to be rattled when Dunn is on base.
With his power, every hittable Strike he takes, in hopes of getting Walked, means one less opportunity for a Home Run. Every Walk he gets when there are runners on base or in scoring position means the onus is placed on somebody else to drive in Runs.
Now, if THOSE players were GOOD at driving Runs in, then THEY would be batting in Dunn's spot in the order and THEY would be making the BIG bucks instead of Dunn.
Now, if we were talking about Corey (Automatic Out) Patterson taking Pitches and thus trying to get on base, then THAT is a different thing altogether.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 27, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Just a heads up to people outside of Toronto, don't take stories by the Toronto Sun as scripture. It's about half a step up from the National Enquirer, and they will contort a quote whatever way they can to sell papers. Team that with JP who has proven he'll outright lie, and there's not much to this story. Look to the National Post, Globe and Mail, or Toronto Star for a legitimate story.
As far as budget, Rogers has about enough money to buy every significant free agent on the market, so don't worry about the econonmy. Fact is, when Rogers announced the initial 20-30 mill$ increase to the payroll, JP had the team making TONS of money each year. I believe they've been loosing money the last 3 years, so don't look for Ted to approve a long term deal for JP (if you get my drift).
Posted by: KenInToront | November 27, 2008 at 02:43 PM
"I think in the end, other teams will outbid the Giants for Tex and Dunn, and the team will then be left with figuring out if they want to go with Ishi/Phelps for 1B and Sandoval for 3B, or perhaps make a play for someone like Beltre for 3B and go with Sandoval for 1B."
Totally agree with this. I actually think going after Beltre would make more sense for them, unless it would cost them some serious young talent.
"Considering Dunn had 521 At Bats in 2007 and 517 At Bats in 2008 and considering what type of hitter Dunn is, if he isn't playing in a bandbox then 32 Home Runs and 85 RBI's should be all that you can expect out of Dunn.
As far as On Base Percentage goes, big deal. He has no speed, so stealing bases, going from First to Third and scoring from First on Doubles aren't a big threat. This means the Pitchers and Defense aren't going to be rattled when Dunn is on base."
You called Adam Dunn a bad baseball player. I realize that GABP helped to puff up Dunn's numbers, much like it did for other guys like Joe Randa. But to act as if Adam Dunn is a poor baseball player is simply wrong. How can you say OBP isn't a big deal. The whole point of each at bat is to create runs, and one of the most efficient ways of doing that is to consistently get guys on base.
I've never argued that Dunn is a great player. But for what he does, which is get on base and hit for power, you have to admit that he's quite good at it.
I think that whatever team adds Dunn will likely know what type of player they're going to get, and won't expect much in terms of defense, intangibles, baserunning, etc.
That said, Adam Dunn is still a good ballplayer, and it has more to do with OBP than anything.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 02:54 PM
Scribbletone,
If Pitchers were good enough to be able to throw Strikes over the outer third of the plate consistantly, Dunn WOULDN'T hit 40 Home Runs a year and his On Base Percentage wouldn't be .380.
Dunn can only hit Fast Balls and Change Ups that are located between the upper thigh and the belt and from the middle of the plate in. He can't do very much with any other pitch and he absolutely can not hit a Slider to save his life.
The reason Dunn Walks 100 times a year and Strikes Out 160+ times a year is because Pitchers try and pitch him outside. When they have good control and can consistantly throw Strikes out there, Dunn gets Struck Out. When they don't have good control, Dunn Walks. Plain and simple.
Pitchers get in trouble when they think they have Dunn set up for a Fast Ball and they throw one over the middle of the plate. THAT is what he is ALWAYS looking for and that is what he hits for his Home Runs.
As far as the argument that Pitchers are scared of Dunn, not true. If they were TRULY scared of Dunn they would Intentionally Walk him more but they don't.
2008 MVP winner Albert Pujols Walked a total of 104 times and led the NL with 34 IBB's. Manny Ramirez was in the NL for a total of 53 Games and Walked a total of 35 times. Of those, 16 were of the Intentional kind.
Adam Dunn? He led all of MLB with 122 Walks and only 13 of those were IBB's.
If you have watched Dunn for any amount of time then you will know this is true because you will be SOOOOOO frustrated that he is taking hittable Strikes over the outer half of the plate. You will also know this after you have watched Dunn take NUMEROUS Pitches for called third Strikes and then watch as he walks back to the dugout with that goofy look on his face.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 27, 2008 at 02:57 PM
For what this is worth, go to Dunn's baseball reference page and click "Neutralize Stats". With the corrections they use (neutral ballpark, league average offense), his career HR, OBP, and SLG all go up slightly. He is NOT a product of his homepark. The talk about him being a bad ballplayer is silly .. he's got a career .900 OPS.
The argument that he's a only a mistake hitter might be a fair one. I haven't watched Dunn play much at all (Red Sox fan here), but if he has a hole in his swing on the outside part of the plate, it's not as if MLB teams aren't aware of it. In other words, they're working off that scouting report and yet he's still a .900 OPS player.
Frankly, the criticisms of him always wind up sounding really biased to me after a point. I'm talking about the "goofy look on his face", "he doesn't even like to play baseball" sort of stuff. Sounds a lot like what we heard about JD Drew before he came to Boston, and I'll tell you, he's a darn good player when he's on the field.
Posted by: ArtVandelay33 | November 27, 2008 at 03:23 PM
I think Dunn at four years $52 million is a better value than Manny at two years $50 million...
Posted by: MikeClarke | November 27, 2008 at 03:27 PM
ctownboy,
But who cares exactly why Dunn hits 40 home runs and has a .380+ OBP? That's been his consistent production for years, albeit pumped up by the GABP. If pitchers were going to figure out how to completely shut down Dunn, they would've by now.
I'm not trying to defend Dunn's approach at the plate or anything, I'm just saying that regardless of why he's a productive hitter, he still produces.
He could post a .400 OBP because pitchers think he's ugly and just want to throw baseballs at him, and so he gets hit by a bunch of pitches. That'd still make him a solid offensive option, because he's still getting on base 40% of the time.
I'm sure watching Dunn as a fan must have been brutal though, as the strikeouts and wasted plate appearences do begin to take a toll.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Scribbletone, agreed about Beltre and 1B for the Giants. For entertainment value though, I'd like to see what would happen if the Giants threw a wrench in the Angels/Yankees/Red Sox plans by offering Tex 6/$140 million, and at least made all of them work for it.
The irony here is that if the money was almost equal, the Giants would also have a shot at CC, for about 6/$140 million as well. But to play in both sandboxes, they'd have to move Rowand's salary and probably Molina/Winn's as well just so they could reload a little with someone who wants to play there, like Burrell.
Having said that, I'd prefer they:
a) Grab Beltre and sign Furcal to firm up the left side;
b) Go cheap with Burriss/Frandsen for 2B and Sandoval/Ishi for 1B;
c) Move Rowand in a salary dump and put Winn in CF;
d) Sign Burrell for RF.
Sure, it's an extra $30 million in payroll less Rowand's salary movement, but there are no long-term commitments added here but a lot of short-term power improvements.
Posted by: Buck Henry | November 27, 2008 at 04:16 PM
On a completely different note, anyone have an opinion of Khalil Greene and Colt Morton to the Tigers for ?? Can't say I know enough of the Tigers farm system as to what these two would bring back.
I don't see Morton in the long term plans of the Pads (decent catcher, ok maybe a tad below decent) and Greene is very very good defensively, and may one day hit 27 HR's again...who knows...just a thought.
Happy Thanksgiving
Posted by: Just another idiot | November 27, 2008 at 04:20 PM
"Dunn can only hit Fast Balls and Change Ups that are located between the upper thigh and the belt and from the middle of the plate in. He can't do very much with any other pitch and he absolutely can not hit a Slider to save his life."
This type of characteristic regarding a batter's comfort zone is always pretty funny to me.
Most batters (other than M. Ramirez, Vlad guererro reggie jackson and VERY few other power hitters have large power zones and the ones that are FB only (Jason Bay is this way also) is pretty common also amongst HR hitters. Why? because a pitcher cannot always get ahead with the off speed pitch and a good power hitter is supposed to make them pay with that mistake pitch. Key, is hitting the 1st mistake out and that is the rarity for guys like Dunn and Bay and there is -0- wrong with having a small power zone, especially when he does not chase pitches he knows are not in his zone.
Posted by: johns | November 27, 2008 at 04:33 PM
I'm not so sure that any team would want to take on Rowand's contract though. Rowand has 4/44 left on his contract, and he's really not a good defensive CF anymore, which makes his bat look quite weak. They may be able to find some team but I wouldn't keep my hopes up on that one.
And Pat Burrell is one of the worst defensive outfielders in baseball, putting him in right field isn't a great idea. I guess the offense would end up being pretty good with Beltre, Furcal, Winn, Burrell, Molina, Sandoval, Lewis and Frandsen, but the defense wouldn't be too hot.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 27, 2008 at 04:37 PM
I think Dunn would be a great fit for the A's at DH should they miss out on Furcal. I don't know if they have the money to sign him but how great would it be to have him hit behind Holliday. With Chavez back I think they could be a contender Rock.
Posted by: Robert | November 27, 2008 at 06:16 PM
"As far as On Base Percentage goes, big deal. He has no speed, so stealing bases, going from First to Third and scoring from First on Doubles aren't a big threat. This means the Pitchers and Defense aren't going to be rattled when Dunn is on base."
And here, the ignorance is exposed. Learn a thing or two about baseball before you call a player bad at the game. Getting on base = the key to any offense. It's that simple. It doesn't matter if he can steal a base. The fact that he has power to boot make him that much more valuable.
Posted by: richphillies | November 27, 2008 at 07:00 PM
Also, it doesn't matter that Dunn played in a small park. His home runs are among the longest in the game.
Posted by: richphillies | November 27, 2008 at 07:03 PM
ctownboy
have you missed the reality that most of dunns home runs are 400 to 450 feet? last i checked that gets the ball out in most places of every ballpark. I saw him play twice this year and saw him hit 3 to the top of the wall at the 418 marker, none going for home runs. Not all parks have a fence that deep in center. Dunn will get his homeruns no matter where he plays. There is no way that GABP boosts his numbers by 28%. That is just bull. Your statistics just don't apply to a guy that hits hrs as far as dunn does.
Posted by: coltholt | November 27, 2008 at 08:09 PM
To you haters out there, ie. Buck Henry, the Sox will walk away with Tex and from what I'm hearing from my inside sources they are preparing to make the offer by next week somewhere in the range of 7 years/ 175 mil. FYI the Giants wish they could come close to "throwing a wrench" in the plans of the Sox/Yanks/and in this case Angels. They don't have the cash. Nothing they could do could be worse then what the Sox and Yanks will do to each other. My prediction though is once the dust settles the Sox walk away with Tex, Yanks walk away with C.C. and Angels with Manny.
Which brings me to my next point. Anyone who ranks Dunn or any other free agent bat (with the possible exception of Tex) higher then Manny or even says Dunn is a better deal then Manny is out of their minds. Did you guys not see what Manny did for the Dodgers this year? Why do you think he wouldn't be able to do it for anyone else. The guy hit almost .400 after the trade and I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that if you compare a .400 batting average with a .400 obs you would probably want the average. Especially someone who can also hit 40 homers and not strikeout 200 times. You guys are nuts. Manny is one of the greatest right-handed hitters in the history of the game.
And you want to compare him to Adam Dunn? unbelievable.
Posted by: evilsauron2 | November 27, 2008 at 09:23 PM
Just to bolster my point:
Manny:
career: 527 hr 1725 rbi
.593 slg .411 obs .314 avg
after trade(53 games): 17 hr
53 rbi .743 slg .489 obs
.396 avg
Dunn:
career: 278 hr 672 rbi
.518 slg .381 obs .247 avg
after trade(44 games): 8 hr
26 rbi .472 slg .417 obs
.243 avg
Oh yeah and by the way Dunn has 1200+ strikeouts in 3600+ at-bats where Manny has 1600+ strikeouts in 7600+ at-bats.
Yeah they seem almost comparable if Dunn could cut his strikeouts down by 30-40% a year and raise his avg 70 points a year. And this is coming from a Boston fan who will never forgive Manny. What is wrong with you guys?
Posted by: evilsauron2 | November 27, 2008 at 09:48 PM
Just so you guys know not all Reds fans are so down on ex-reds! Just watch clips from some of Adam Dunn's home runs, most of them would be out in ANY park. I guarantee you the park does NOT increase his power numbers by 28%. Freaking ridiculous.
Posted by: TheCincyKid | November 27, 2008 at 10:52 PM
CincyKid is right on, we're not all like that.
Ctown, guess what Dunn's split for home and career home runs are? 150 GABP homers and 128 away game homers.
That's really not a large difference.
So now that it has been debunked you can move on to how he doesn't hit with runners on and isn't clutch. If anyone else has listened to Cincinnati talk radio during Dunn's tenure you know that is exactly where it is going next...
Posted by: BankStreetGrounds | November 27, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Bit of a type when I said split for home and career home runs. Meant to say home and away career home runs, although I'm sure you can tell that.
Posted by: BankStreetGrounds | November 27, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Also 21 of those home HR's are from Riverfront/Cinergy.
triple post for the win!
Posted by: BankStreetGrounds | November 27, 2008 at 11:03 PM
Dunn's lack of attention is odd seeing how much you hear Ibanez's name being thrown around. Dunn has quality and age on him. I don't understand why the Braves aren't jumping on him instead of the idiotic Ludwick talks. Dunn can at least be counted on for some SLG.
Posted by: insomniac | November 28, 2008 at 12:45 AM
Scribbletone,
Adam Dunn is a good Hoem RUn hitter but not a good baseball palyer.
Dunn does not have a good Batting Average
Dunn does not have a good BA with RISP
Dunn does not steal bases or run the bases well
Dunn does not have good range in hte Outfeild or have a strong or accurate arm.
Being a baseball player involves MORE than just being able to hit a Home Run.
This is why Dunn has only received MVP votes in two years. It is also why his highest finish has been 26th.
This also explains why Dunn has been on only one All Star team and that was as a Reserve.
Not only is Dunn not a fan favorite, All Star Managers also haven't picked him to be on the team. So, people might want to call the fans stupid or ill informed but what about all the different Managers?
Finally, if you want to see something eye opening, go to ESPN's baseball web page, click on stats and then click All Time. Once there, click on Home Runs and go and find Dunn. Then look at his RBI total and compare it to the guys around him.
As you will notice, Dunn has 278 Home Runs and most of the guys around him in the Home Run column have at least 1000 RBI's while Dunn has only 672. The only guy who is close to Dunn in Home Runs and RBI's is Alfonso Soriano (270/705) and he has been a lead off hitter for most of his Career.
Soem will argue that this is because Dunn hasn't had as many opportunites to drive in RUns as other guys because of the hitters in front of him. This might be true for a year or two but NOT for a guy who has been in the Majors eight years.
In fact, Reds' lead off hitters ranked in the top third of the NL from 2004 to 2007 as far as On Base Percentage goes. Also, in 2007, Reds' lead off and number two hitters, combined, ranked second in the NL in On Base Percentage behind Philadelphia.
So, Dunn HAS had RBI opportunites. His problem is he is a bad hitter (.247 career Batting Average, .223 BA with RISP) and he takes too many hittable Strikes and gets Walked too much.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 28, 2008 at 12:57 AM
richphillies,
Look at the Adam Dunn fans and how they are arguing for him. Do you see that the most mentioned thing is the distance of his Home Runs? Hell, even you yourself used that to argue for him.
What this tells me (and what I have seen from watching Dunn for eight years) is that with his power, if he were to swing the bat more, he would be able to hit more Home Runs.
However, because he WONT swing at pitches over the outer third of the plate, he hasn't hit as many Home Runs as he could have.
If you look at Ryan Howard's stats, most of his Home Runs go to either Center Field or Left Centerfield. If you look at Dunn's stats, most of his Home Runs go to Right Field and Right Centerfield, meaning he is pulling almost everything.
To confirm this, just watch how opposing Defenses put the Infield shift on against him. By NOT swinging at outside pitches, Dunn is taking away at least 1/3 of the ball park. This reduces his chances to get Hits and, with his power, reduces his opportunites for Home Runs. Both of these things reduce his RBI opportunites.
So, when Dunn does NOT swing at a hittable pitch, a pitch he COULD hit out of the ball park and takes it in hopes of getting a meat pitch (which might never come), he is giving up an opportunity.
By taking the pitch and then getting the Walk, his opportunity cost is a Home Run.
Now, if we were talking about a guy like Norris Hopper, a fast guy who has one Home Run in 396 career At Bats or if we were talking about most Pitchers, I would have no problem with them getting Walked because the opportunity cost for them is not as great. They are NOT likely to be able to hit a Home Run each time they come to the plate.
Finally, as far as Walks go and scoring Runs, last year Dunn had 122 Hits, 23 Doubles, 40 Home Runs and led all of MLB with 122 Walks and he scored a grand total of 79 Runs.
Is this because he had bad hitters behind him all year? Possibly but I don't think Joey Votto is a bad hitter and he hit seventh for msot of hte time that KGJ and Dunn were on the team.
No, Dunn didn't score many Runs because 1) he didn't steal many bases. When he reached First Base, he was basically an anchor. 2) when a player behind him did get a SIngle, Dunn would most often just jog to Second Base, take a few steps beyond and then go back to Second. He often did the same thing when he was on Second and the batter hit a Single.
Because of this, when Dunn reached First Base, it usually took at least a couple of Singles or an Extra Base Hit to score him that wouldn't happen with a faster base runner.
Also, when Dunn is on First Base, if a guy following him got a Double it didn't guaranteee Dunn would score. I know because I saw Dunn get thrown out twice last year at Home while trying to score from First on a Double.
So, as far as Walks and On Base Percentage goes, I would rather a speedy guy at the top of the order be getting those and inflating his OPS because of it and my middle ofthe order guys swinging the bat, and increasing their OPS via Slugging Percentage.
Fast, top of the order guy on base + powerful, middle of order hitter swinging bat most times = Runs being scored.
Slow, powerful, middle of the order hitter not swinging bat and getting Walked = "lesser" hitters needing to string together a couple of Hits or getting an Extra Base Hit to = Runs being scored.
I will take scenario A over scenario B every time because it is more likely a Run or Runs will be scored and it means the middle of the order hitter is doing the job he is getting paid for and NOT pushing the responsibility off to a "lesser" hitter who is NOT getting paid as much.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 28, 2008 at 01:33 AM
I'd say Dunn signs with the Rangers. He'd fit in the middle of that order as a DH/1B/OF.
Also Average and RBIs are pretty over-rated stats. RBI is about chances and average means little compared to OB%. Average is just hits. If people just went by hits the Ichiro is a god. But since they go by OB% now he is not so great.
Ichiro vs Markakis:
Ichiro - 213 H + 51 BB = 264 times on base
Markakis - 182 H + 99 BB = 281 times on base
But Ichiro goes to the AS Game while Nick stays at home.
Posted by: XD23 | November 28, 2008 at 01:50 AM
Colthoit, the Cincykid, BankStreetGrounds,
If you would go to ESPN's baseball web page and click on Adam Dunn and then click on Splits, you will find that from 2003, when GASP opened, until he was traded to the Arizona Diamondbacks on August 11, 2008, Dunn hit 124 Home Runs at Home and 101 Home Runs on the Road.
No, it is not much difference over a 5 1/2 year time period. Ah, but you failed to look at the number of At Bats he did this in.
Over that time period, Dunn hit his 124 Home Runs in GASP in 1470 At Bats and his 101 Home Runs on the Road in 1478 At Bats.
Broken down, that means Dunn hit a HR at Home once in every 11.854838 At Bats and a HR on the Road once in every 14.633663 At Bats. When you divide those numbers out, you will find Dunn hit 20% more of his HR's at Home than on the Road.
With all of the power you guys keep arguing he has and saying that he could hit Home Runs anywhere and that BIll James was wrong in saying that GASP inflated Left Handed hitters power numbers by 28%, then how do you explain these stats?
Finally, in 2008, while with the Reds, Dunn hit 32 Home Runs in 373 At Bats, or one in every 11.66 At Bats. After he was traded to the D-backs, he hit 8 Home Runs in 144 At Bats, or one in every 18 At Bats. What happened? Did Dunn just all of a sudden get weak or did going and playing his Games in the NL West, where the ball parks are larger, affect him?
When looking at the stats from last year they very well could have.
In 2008, the Reds finished 4th in the NL as far as total Home Runs hit. In 2007, they were 3rd. In 2006, they were 2nd.
In 2008, the Rockies finished 9th in the NL as far as total Home Runs hit, the D-backs 10th, Padres 11th, Dodgers 13th and the Giants last.
In 2007, NL West teams finished 7th, 8th, 9th, 14th and 15th, respectively, in total Home Runs hit.
In 2006, they finished 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th, respectively.
Do you see a pattern here?
It looks to me that Home Runs are harder to hit in ball parks in the NL West and it also looks like Adam Dunn's Home Run prodcution dropped after he left the Reds and was traded out West.
Posted by: ctownboy | November 28, 2008 at 02:02 AM
"The ONLY reason Dunn hits 40 Home Runs a year is because of the park he plays in."
This actually fairly simple to debunk...I present Adam Dunn's home/road splits 2008 edition.
Home:
GABP: .229avg, .488slg, 16hr/201ab
Chase: .225avg, .507slg, 5hr/72ab
Road:
.245avg, .535slg, 19hr/245ab
He hit for higher average, higher slugging, and more home runs away from GABP in 2008 plain and simple. Even worse, take all of Cincy's 20+ HR guys from last year and tell me who suffered more outside of GABP...
Brandon Phillips 21.54 hr/ab GABP to 34.88 road
Joey Votto 18.5 hr/ab GABP to 29.9 road
Edwin Encarnacion 16.8 hr/ab GABP to 23.10 Road
Jay Bruce 16.10 hr/ab GABP to 25.5 road
ADAM DUNN 12.56 HR/AB GABP TO 13.17 ROAD/CHASE.
Posted by: grimace455 | November 28, 2008 at 05:19 AM
I'd like to argue that Adam Dunn might be better than people give him credit for. A lot of the production stats are based on who's hitting in front of and behind him and Cincy hasn't been a mecca for great hitters for the last 5 years. You put Adam Dunn in a lineup where he has protected and he'll have even better stats.
Posted by: TheCincyKid | November 28, 2008 at 07:15 AM
Not sure how many players other than Dunn that you can pencil in every single year...
100 Runs
100 RBIS
100 Waks
40 Bombs
.380 OBP
Defense in LF is important, but certainly is the one place where you can get away with below average defense.
I would certainly prefer paying Dunn $10 to $15 million a year for four or five years then giving $10 plus million a year to an aging veteran like Ibanez, Abreu, etc.
Dunn might be surest bet on the market.
Posted by: MikeClarke | November 28, 2008 at 07:45 AM
Rogers also made a claim in a Toronto paper that if JP was to set up something to get Manny to Toronto that he would be willing to give the team even more money than he had already planned to.
But the thing is, even if Rogers gives the Jays 20-30MM more dollars to spend, where do they spend it and on who?
The Jays have holes to fill and no minor leaguers to fill the holes with and not a lot of trading chips that they can afford to move.
Here's how I see things panning out for the Jays.
C - Barajas / Bard maybe Barrett?
1B - Lind
2B - Hill
SS - Scutaro
3B - Rolen
RF - Rios
CF - Wells
LF - Snider
DH - ?
Starting Rotation
- Halladay
- McGowan
- Purcey
- Litsch
- Janssen
Sure there's rotation spots that could be open and honestly, I would love for the Jays to not have to use Purcey in the rotation and Janssen may not be in starting form for a while so I think the Jays should be looking at a FA starter of some sort to ensure a good rotation. IMO, Burnett wont be re-signed because he wants 5 years and with his past injury issues, do the Jays really need to take that kind of a risk?
Trade wise, there's been rumours circulating about a potential Overbay/Frasor to Texas for Blalock + pitching prospect move which would then likely set up a platoon between 1st and DH with Lind and Blalock.
Posted by: xethicx | November 28, 2008 at 08:36 AM
This constant Dunn bashing is getting ridiculous! Lets match him up against a couple outfielders who make over 100 million career:
Soriano .282/.329/.518
Wells .283/.332/.480
Beltran .281.357/.496
Dunn .243/.417/.472
Now Soriano is barely better at fielding. Dunn destroys him in ops. He beats wells by almost 100 points there as well. Beltran is the closest here. If you want to use batting average which is just archaic then ok. But all the important numbers are higher. I don't see Dunn signing before the big names but a 5yr at 75-80 million seems reasonable. Oh and by the way he's younger then all of these guys.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | November 28, 2008 at 08:48 AM
joemorgan=#1:
You can't match Dunn up against Beltran and Wells because they play center field, which is a MUCH more defense-heavy position than a corner OF spot. Beltran's bat is elite for CF AND he is very adept defensively, which makes him well worth his contract. Wells shouldn't be playing CF, so you get a point there, although if he played in a corner, he'd probably be an elite defensive corner OF.
Agreed with you on the Soriano comp though. Soriano and Dunn are both butchers in a corner OF spot.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 28, 2008 at 09:01 AM
re: Beaston link
FINALLY someone who is sensible! Why spend $100 mill on an average team (Colletti). Why hand out lasrge contracts to middle of the road free agents comming off career years.
I agree with him 100%, lets save the 24 mill on Burnett till next year when we're a little healtier, and bid on some FA who are under 30 years of age.
I'm not sure why they want Burnett back anyway, he was worth 12 mill, but not 16, and will only decline from here on out. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd rather have Oliver Perez at 12 mill than Burnett at 16
Posted by: KenInToront | November 28, 2008 at 09:04 AM
i agree with you guys a little about waiting on manny and the like, but i think it has to do more with Abreau and more comparable players to Dunn signing. Tex, manny and CC are in their own stratosphere....
Posted by: AstrosCoverage.blogspot.com | November 28, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Melonis-
Agreed I was just using a very simple comparison to show that this guy is a very good player. Beltran is more valuable for sure and I feel worth what he gets paid. Wells and Soriano are both overrated. Taking in defense and total value of a player, obviously they bring more to the table. Dunn is still very good and worth way more then 10-12 like people suggest. If he was a first baseman he would be right up there (not all the way up there) but close to Ryan Howard. No one says he's over paid and I guarantee he gets over 100 mill for his first big contract. They are both butchers in the field but damn can they slug a baseball.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | November 28, 2008 at 12:04 PM
"As far as On Base Percentage goes, big deal. He has no speed, so stealing bases, going from First to Third and scoring from First on Doubles aren't a big threat. This means the Pitchers and Defense aren't going to be rattled when Dunn is on base.
With his power, every hittable Strike he takes, in hopes of getting Walked, means one less opportunity for a Home Run. Every Walk he gets when there are runners on base or in scoring position means the onus is placed on somebody else to drive in Runs."
Wow
All of what I just quoted is ridiculously biased.
You just said it's a bad thing he gets on base, because he has no speed. And you're mad because he is taking strikes rather than attempting to hit home runs.
K
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 28, 2008 at 12:18 PM
xethicx, I think what some of you aren't understanding is this: For the Blue Jays to have a comparable payroll to last year Rogers will have to increase the budget by roughly $20 million Canadian. That is just to stand still with the declining loonie. Remember most of the Jays revenue is in Canadian dollars. Increasing the payroll by the $20-$30 million you talk about would in fact take a $40-$50 million dollar increase in the teams budget.
Their is no way an owner who isn't even running his company at this time, might still be in hospital, will be spending an extra $40-$50 million Canadian on the Jays this year .
Again, Just to sum it up. Rogers has to increase the budget by $20+ million Canadian just to keep the payroll in American dollars that the Blue Jays had last year. Thats the cold hard reality. There is not a hope in hell that he adds $40-$50 million Canadian.
Posted by: tbk104 | November 28, 2008 at 12:42 PM
tbk104,
I think you've only read half the history book on Canadian Economy and Sports 101. The Blue Jays signed the majority of the current contracts save Alex Rios, and set their payroll 2 years ago. The dollar two years ago was right around the same spot it is now.
Everyone last year asked JP if he was going to be able to increase payroll because of the dollar, and he said pretty clearly no. The fact the dollar is down from last year does not mean they have less to work with, it means they're on the same level as the '06 - '07 offseason.
Ted Rogers has more money than most people could ever imagine, so a fluctuating economy is not going to scare him off, especially when the competition (Raptors and Leafs) are making big signings each year. When he originally increased the budget, the team (JP) was making money. The past two years, they've lost money and there's no way old Teddy will let JP go out and sign long contracts he likely won't be around to re-negotiate (JP will before they expire).
Posted by: KenInToront | November 28, 2008 at 02:09 PM
KenInToront: I'm not going to dig the article up but the Blue Jays have already admitted more then a month ago that they didn't hedge enough, it was alluded that they have 50% covered, as they didn't predict the rapid decline in the loonie.
So well the payroll might have been set 2 years ago the money wasn't banked and Ted will have to budget more just too stand still; forget about an increase in payroll.
Its not that hard of a concept to understand.
A little from an article earlier this month to help you understand:
"
The Jays, like the Raptors and Leafs, have most of their revenue (about 65%) in Canadian money while all but about 15% of their expenses are in American funds. On a $100-million payroll, it costs them about $8 million for every 10-cent dip in the Canadian currency.
It means, Georgopoulos says, that signing a big-name free-agent hitter is probably out of the question financially. Big long-term contracts, such as the one to which the Jays signed Vernon Wells, and which sees his salary escalate to $21 million in 2010, may become millstones.
"If a Canadian team signed a player to a big contract recently -- let's just say five years for $10 million a season when the Canadian dollar was at 1-to-1 value with the American dollar -- it seemed a reasonable deal," Georgopoulos says. "But now suddenly that $10 million is going to cost the team a lot more."
So, instead of adding a hitter, the Jays may have to start thinking about dumping one. It could preclude any plan of resigning pitcher A.J. Burnett. "
It is a fact that Ted will have to significantly increase the teams budget just to keep the same level of payroll.
Before the decline in the loonie would you have thought Ted would increase the teams budget to $140-$150 million? Its a nice dream but Ted's rich for a reason and he won't be increasing the team budget by 40%+ this year.
Just watch
Posted by: tbk104 | November 28, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Just in case some people still don't get it
Last years $100 million payroll would cost the Jays roughly $120 million this year; a 20% budget increase.
So no, they are not in the same position as the '06-'07 offseason
Posted by: tbk104 | November 28, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Don't expect to see Adam Dunn sign until Mark Teixiera,CC Sabathia,and Manny Ramirez have all signed.
Posted by: JT89 | November 28, 2008 at 04:20 PM
I see the points made, all valid forsure.
To be honest, I dont expect the Jays to win the division any time soon, nor do I expect them to make the post season any time soon. I would just like to see them deliver a little more offense is all.
If they were to trade Overbay to Texas with Frasor for Blalock and Blalock had a healthy season that would be good for the Jays but Rios, Wells, Rolen, Barajas, Hill, Lind and Snider all have great offensive potential so if those players were to all have even average offensive seasons, I think Id be very happy with the year.
Pitching wise, there's no question that without Burnett and Marcum, they need to grab a free agent starter. So if they could even afford a type B starter to come in and have a decent season, I would be happy but thats only if the guys on the staff now have good years. Halladay is a given but I really think McGowan and Litsch have some serious stuff but are just not quite there yet.
All in all I think the Jays could win with the personnel they have if everyone could stay healthy and have even average years.
But lets face it, in this day and age, the Jays stand little chance when they have the Yanks and Sox to compete with in the division.
Posted by: xethicx | November 28, 2008 at 04:22 PM
tbk104
I 'understand', don't worry about that. I undertand you can regergitate information other reporters feed you and accept them as fact, without ever questioning them or thinking for yourself.
Maybe I can explain this to YOU, on NOV27 2006, the Canadian dollar was worth 0.88 cents USD. On NOV27 2008, the Canadian dollar is worth 0.81 cents USD. The dollar SWOON is just things getting back to normal, people forget it rocketted up last year. Canada is in a recession, Toronto is not (except for the stock market).
The Blue Jays budgets were given to JP in 2005 through to this year. They did not go up, or down significantly because they were set in advance, regardless of last year's strong economy, or this year's return to normal.
The REAL reason the Jays will not spend this year is 1 - they realize they are more than one player away from beating the Yanks, Sox and yes, Rays. 2 - The budget was increased when the team was making money, which they are no longer doing(Forbes ranked them as one of the few teams that LOST money in 2007, '08 was surely the same DESPITE the strong Canadian economy throught the spring and summer) and 3 - JP's job is on the line and Ted won't let him dig himself a hole he won't be allowed to dig out of.
I know what the guys at ESPN and CBS are saying, you don't have to copy and past it here. Just post an original thought.
Posted by: KenInToront | November 28, 2008 at 05:58 PM