MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Kasten: No Offer Yet For Teixeira | Main | Tigers Interested In Beimel »

Towers: Peavy To Braves Could Still Happen

Now that the Cubs have essentially taken themselves out of the Jake Peavy sweepstakes by signing free agent pitcher Ryan Dempster, Padres GM Kevin Towers is looking for a new trade partner.

MLB.com's Corey Brock reminds us that "Towers indicated Monday that the Cubs were essentially his sole focus as far as discussions to trade Peavy, the 2007 National League Cy Young Award winner."

Now the Padres may try to rekindle talks with the Braves:

Towers wouldn't rule out the possibility of circling back around to the Braves, who last week said they were moving on after a deal couldn't be reached.

"You never know ... we certainly made more progress with them," Towers said. "We were able to ID and agree upon a large part of the package."

The Braves have always been the logical landing place for Peavy. Atlanta GM Frank Wren said recently that he had given up on trading for the Padres ace.

Coley Ward writes for Umpbump.com and can be reached here.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535fa25c9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Towers: Peavy To Braves Could Still Happen:

Comments

why are the cubs out of the running now? not enough cash?

This is slowly becoming a joke

Um didn't the deal the the Braves already fall apart because Towers couldn't pull the trigger?

Anyone else getting tired of hearing about this Peavy trade?

Do ittttttt. The Braves need him if they want to stay competitive.

Although Towers is going to start looking desperate soon. Just hoping he doesn't hold out as long as MIN did last season with Santana.

There's still time. The Winter Meetings don't start for another couple of weeks.

I'm with junbun--I think the Cubs could still grab Peavy. Ken Rosenthal certainly thinks it's a possibility.

It seems to me that the Padres are holding out for one thing and one thing only, and that's young pitching. Tommy Hanson doesn't seem to be available; Jose Ceda's in Miami. Who's Towers holding out for?

It's still between the Braves and the Dodgers. No one else has the prospects.

Towers is going to milk this until he gets what he wants, and rightfully so. I'd expect it to go down after a few big name FA pitchers sign.

so why would Frank Wren offer as much in a package now. He knows that no one else is bidding for him anymore. Towers has hurt himself now

Starting to feel bad for KT. He's literally begging to give away Peavy.

I knew he'd come back to the Braves. It just made too much sense for Peavy not to go to Atlanta. Make the trade Wren and then sign Furcal to play SS. Make it happen!!

Towers: Fine, Frank. You don't want him, I'll trade him to... Chicago! So there.

Wren: Okay. Do it.

Towers: crap.

If the Braves lose out on Burnett and Lowe they have to take another look at Peavy and give up more than they offered KT.

I hope Wren offers the same package as before, with the exception of Yunel Escobar. Swap him for Brent Lillibridge. Towers had his chance, he screwed up. Now he can settle for a little less.

Furcal and Renteria are still available, so I'm sure the Braves would still consider giving up Escobar. If the Padres were willing to accept what the Braves offered earlier I think Wren would probably still do it. Things haven't changed that much since then.

I think this is the perfect time for the Cubs to get Peavy. The Braves will not offer nearly as much as they were before, so I wouldn't be suprised if the Cubs could get a trade done without a third team.

Coley Ward, is that you opinion that the Cubs are out it? Or has that been published somewhere?
All indications say that the Cubs are still interested trying to get a third team involved.
Anyways, I still feel Peavy won't be traded. The Braves offer wasn't good, and without Hanson it won't be good. The Cubs have to get a third team, and there have been no indications of what team that could be. The Dodgers? Well they have to give more, and we know they won't.

Lillibridge is a pretty big downgrade from Esocbar. I'd try to keep Yunel and move Flowers while he's hot.

I wonder how close Hoffman and Peavy were. That whole fiasco last week could change things. Maybe make Peavy a little more willing to get out of Diego.

drPhonic, The deal with the Braves for Peavy fell through because the Braves would not include enough top prospects to make it work for the Padres.

Now that the Yankees have offered CC Sabathia 6 years/$140 million as an opening salvo and after the Braves see the 5 year/$80 million offer the Yankees just gave Burnett and what Dempster got from the Cubs, they may be right back in the Peavy sweepstakes.

First off, for the past two weeks, people have been speculating that even if the Cubs were to either trade for Peavy or resign dempster, it would not have an effect on acquiring the other player. The only hinge that some were saying was that of also bringing back KW. We konw thats not happening, so it looks better for the Cubs now to get Peavy, except for the Ceda issue, that it did before.

Also: "It's still between the Braves and the Dodgers. No one else has the prospects." It was NEVER between the Dodgers and Braves. The Braves have been the heaviest bidders since Day 1 of 'Peavy Watch 2008' and the word on the Dodgers was that they would have to give a TON of talent in return: Kershaw. It was always between the Cubs and Braves.

"I'd try to ... move Flowers while he's hot."

I completely agree. What need do you have in a 22yr old catcher when you have Brian McCann catching right now? Atlanta's good at finding hidden gems. The chances of finding another Flower's for them is pretty good, in my opinion.

Apollo- Kevin Towers is not going to take less. You know it.

Yeah, I guess my point isn't so much specific as it is general about making Towers take less.

it is not going to come down to that - Wren backed out so he is not going too offer more - if a deal is going to happen Towers is going to wind up calling Wren and the deal will get done for what was offered in the first place..

"so why would Frank Wren offer as much in a package now. He knows that no one else is bidding for him anymore. Towers has hurt himself now"

Given how Dempster is already off the market and the Yankees are likely to get one or both of Lowe/Burnett this is the best way for the Braves to get a quality starter. People have been talking about how the Braves would be better off going with Lowe or Burnett as if it was a forgone conclusion they were going to get one of them if they passed on Peavy. The reality is they are likely going to miss out on both and are going to put more effort into Peavy.

Furcal sounds more than willing to go to the Braves so make a trade including Escobar and add Flowers like they reportedly asked about. The Braves can then sign Furcal and will have upgraded at shortstop and have added a top of the rotation starter.

The comments about Towers making mistakes, etc are overblown, he did not act in desperation and take a poor offer and is probably waiting till the Braves miss out on the top free agent starters.

I read somewhere else not sure where but the Cubs were going to pursue Peavy even if they did resign Dempster. I think the Cubs will find a 3rd party and it will get done.

I didn't say he would....but then again he could very well be thrust into that situation where he has to. He's going to look like an absolute rear end if he doesn't deal Peavy, and he has to now to cut the payroll. He's getting backed into a hole..this could get ugly for him.

I believe it hurts both way. Braves and Padres. I am not saving Towers' "retardedness" of not accepting the Braves package in the first place. This is a business and he NEEDS to do the market research of which prospect is available and which is not (Hanson), then he can make a comment on "train has left the station".

Braves need an Ace. It's not a secret. With Dempster off the board, only AJ, CC, and Derek are what I call "true ace". With AJ and CC both seems like to go to the Yankees, Braves don't really have another choice but once again to go for Peavy. This is a supply and demand system, Braves need Peavy and Padre needs to sell Peavy. I believe they will finally agree on the package that braves have offered before. Just a reminder, Peavy doesnt need to leave, but Braves doesn't need Peavy either (if braves can go aim to trade other pitchers or just not be a contender). But I believe Padres trading Peavy is more likely to happen then Braves trade or aiming just for Peavy. So bottom line Braves do have some leverage.

If the Braves trade Escobar for Peavy and sign Furcal they are leaps and bounds better.

Peavy gives them the Ace they HAVE to have right now and Furcal gives them the leadoff hitter they've lacked since Furcal left for Dodger-ville a few years ago.

Well the Cubs gave me one birthday resent today and I see no reason as to why they can't still makea Peavy deal. For the last 2 weeks or so many have thought the plan was to resign Dem and trade for Peavy. Now that I think of it they are going to need a closer...hmmm maybe flip Gregg to them in a deal and then resign Kerry "I would do anything to stay in Chicago" Wood to a one year deal. Its not like we have seen anything firm to Kerry yet and I would not put it past Jim to do this. Really though the negative vibe from Tim and the staff of the site on the Cubs making a deal needs to stop.

I agree with Land-Man that the Braves should try to sub-out Flowers instead of Escobar. I probably wouldn't go for it if I was Towers, but it's worth a shot.

If the package was to become Flowers/Hernandez/Morton then I would imagine Locke or Rohrbough would have to be the 4th, but maybe the Padres are higher on Boyer than I am.

The Braves have to get this done. It could help in getting AJ or D Lowe. Furcal might take a discount on going to play for Cox. They set themselves up for 2010.

The Braves are not getting Peavy with Escobar as a centerpiece. If the Braves want Peavy, they will have to trade Hanson. It's as simple as that. It's the same deal with the Cubs and Vitters, maybe Samardzija too.

People who are saying that Wren backed out are stupid. He told the Padres the best offer he was going to make and Towers didn't accept it. This happens more with trades than most of us know, its just that those trades don't make it out in the public as this did. I really don't think that anything will get done until the winter meetings. How much could Peavy really want to stay in San Diego after this mess. Wonder how much longer Towers will be around. The Hoffman issue got handled badly and this Peavy thing has been a mess for both sides. Does he really want to stay around for the rebuilding. Not to mention this guy took a playoff team a few years ago and made them one of the worst in the league. Granted the Dodgers and Diamondbacks got better but still this team fell fast.

123456789, Esco is proven talent at a premium position. Vitters is not. Samrdzija has a no trade, and I doubt he wants to go to Diego. Cubs are out.

Welp, 123456789, I guess the Braves won't be getting Peavy. Hanson is not going to be traded. It's as simple as that.

jtd,

Towers is one of the better GMs in baseball and has been the Padres GM since the mid 90s so I am not sure what you meant by:

"Not to mention this guy took a playoff team a few years ago and made them one of the worst in the league. "

Padres fans are more pissed at the owner. The management has done a good job. The owner on the other hand is the one that is causing the problems. If the Padres were looking to have the same payroll this season they would be able to add a couple of pieces that would take them back to being competitive.

Na, I don't at all think the Braves will have to include Hanson - especially now that FW called Towers' bluff. Anyway, I'm glad Peavy is still a possibility for the Braves.

cwilli
I never said Towers was a bad GM all I meant was that few years ago this team was in the playoffs and now they are one of the worst teams in baseball. I realize that all the blame can't be put on him and that the ownership is being unreasonable in that they want him to cut payroll. Personally I think the worst decision that the team made was to build a stadium that kills offense.

cwilli- You are right about Towers doing a good job but, Moores, Fuson, Alderson, Gayton sucks balls!

"If the Braves want Peavy, they will have to trade Hanson. It's as simple as that."

That's just wrong on so many levels.

Well, if Chicago gets Teahan, then Peavy becomes even less likely.

123456789 i dont think you get it. The cubs dont have the trade pieces besides vitters, the braves have other pieces than hanson. you have to include vitters because the rest is marshall, pie, and cedeno. We can offer multiple talented players. Just because you trade your best prospect doesnt mean we have to trade ours.

That's just wrong on so many levels--
It really is that. If Towers wants to trade with Atlanta he's gonna have to do without Hanson...and he may be forced to trade with them.

i dont think we can take escobar out and especially because it seems furcal is really excited about playing for us in one of the articles i read on here. But instead of it being like a 4-5 person trade for peavy make it like a 3-4 player trade for towers making us wait so long but dont try to take key pieces away.

Excellent point Bravesfan22193.

Like I said last night, for once in my life and happy the Yankees are throwing money around. If the rumor is true about the Yankees throwing 5 years and 80 million at AJ, I dont see the Braves matching it. That leaves Lowe as the Braves last option on the free agent market, and the Mets and Red Sox have expressed interest. So if the Braves get none of the targeted free agents they may have to come back to the Padres as well.

Towers wasn't in charge of the Hoffman thing, that much is pretty clear to us here in San Diego, and we dont blame him for it. It was Alderson, and has been for some time. (If you want to go to XX sports radio and listen to his interview from last night)

Fuson is a good scout, and our lower minors are better for him, its just he wasted picks form 2003-2004 before he got here that has set us back badly.

Bravesfan- Heyward and Julio Teheran are your best prospects and Vitters is going to be a very good player.

atheleticsNbraves,
Yeah, the Escobar/Lilli thing was just an example. Like I said, my point was more general than specific.
BTW,
how many A's/Braves fans are there in the world? Have you by any chance ever been on the Atlanta Braves.com official message board?

Hanson/Heyward/Freeman are not going anywhere, why is that even brought up again?


The only hold up on the Braves trade idea was their unwillingness to include and pitcher that was better than Morton. We want pitching and Morton isn't an upgrade over anything we do not already have. I could see Morton as part of the deal, but the Padres want another arm if that is the case. With their preference of a higher ceiling than a 3-4.

Bravesfan,
And they didn't have the pieces for Harden...so everyone said and what happened??? They got Harden. They have the pieces to get it done. The question isn't about having the opieces its the willingness to trade them.

DTogo,
Not true. Hanson is one of the top 2 or 3 pitching prospects in the game. He'll be a top 20 overall aswell. Heyward and Hanson are a close 1-2 in the Braves organization.

Airman- Fuson has drafted for 4 years and have ZERO top of the rotation starters in AAA and AA. That is pathetic.

Sad thing is this whole Peavy thing probably won't get resolved until some of the big name free agents start falling. One name that hasn't been mentioned on this board is Ben Sheets. I think he could be a good option for the Braves along with Brad Penny.

About Morton. Matt Eddy of Baseball America said this of Denard Spann, "He is the biggest breakout candidiate next to Charlie Morton next season".
Charlie has really great stuff, it's just about when he figures that out. He could be a legit top half of the rotation guy easily when he gains some confidence.

Apollo- Bill Shanks thinks Julio Teheran is a better prospect than Hanson. If you think Hanson is better than Teheran then put him in the Peavy trade.

Apollo- please do not overhype Morton. He has a career ERA 4.35. He had one good year and that was a half season in AAA. Morton is a head case. He is a throw in piece.

Airman
It was reported that the Braves were adding another pitcher to Escobar, Hernandez, and Morton or Reyes. We don't know who that other pitcher was but I think it was Locke. I have read on other sites that the Padres were high on him.

Apollo- please do not overhype Morton. He has a career ERA 4.35. He had one good year and that was a half season in AAA. Morton is a head case no thank you.

I say the braves trade jeff blauser, charlie liebrant, and a water cooler for peavy and torrey pines.

Julio Teheran is also only 17 years old. He's not going to crack baseball america's top 100 yet, and Hanson will be in the top 25%, so for now, Hanson's still #2. You seem to think that Atlanta only has three legit prospects...like the Cubs maybe?

And I'm not overhyping anyone, I'm simply quoting a guy who knows a few things and going on what I know from watching ALL of his big league starts.

Ol' Peter Gammons just said "the Braves aren't going to let an A ball pitcher (Locke or Cole R.) stand between them and jake Peavy...so we'll see what happens.

As far as the Hanson/Teheran debate, Teheran has far more upside, but that's really all he is at this point. BP's perfect world scenario for him was "through the roof".

jtd: that was one of the rumors, and the other was that it was going to be a reliever, whose name i cant remember.

All this talk of the Cubs needing to get Peavy...is it me, or do I remember the Cubs getting beat because they couldn't hit or play defense.

Yeah, my point on Teheran being that he's strictly projection at this point.

To say Morton is a head case is a bit of an exaggeration. There is a difference between lacking confidence and having a legitimate mental hinderance. I do think he is a bit overrated though

njbraves,
They got beat because they enjoy defeat. JK

Apollo'08

LOL Im pretty sure i am the only braves/a's fan and i wanted to find a AL team i liked and it happen to be the A's besides that I have been on the braves forums but i just read what people have to say, never post on there. All that is irrelevant anyway. Hopefully we get peavy and get like garland or someone. we sure as hell need help in our rotation.

Exactly Apollo...he's all projection. The projection is at worst good, and most think he'll be great, but he's only thrown a handful of innings at the pro level. We won't see him in Atlanta (or another ML club) until 2012 or so.

Airman
that reliever was Blaine Boyer. If the trade was Escobar, Hernandez, Morton, Boyer that is just sad. I think it would be be Boyer and Locke to get it done.

Ah, well actually, there is another like you out there. She used to be on the forum, don't know if she still is or not, that's why I asked.

"cwilli- You are right about Towers doing a good job but, Moores, Fuson, Alderson, Gayton sucks balls!"

I disagree, the organization was rated as one of the worst teams in the league with regards to their minor league system and are steadily improving. For the first time in a long time the Padres actually have a lot of players on the verge of contributing at the major league level.

"Fuson has drafted for 4 years and have ZERO top of the rotation starters in AAA and AA. That is pathetic."

Very few teams can say that, thus the scarcity in top of the rotation starters in the majors. The Padres also have one true top of the rotation talent in Mat Latos who will probably start the season in AA.

Blaine Boyer was the reliever...RHP with a very good K rate and acceptable BB rate in his relatively brief stints in the majors (2 years of service time). HRs were a big problem last year, so Petco would definitely be a big help. If its the Braves refusal to replace him with Locke that has held this deal up, then I don't know what Wren is thinking.

cwilli- Matt Latos is starting out in Ft Wayne then Lake Elsinore. That is one a lot of team have 3 or 4. Padres draft pitchability pitchers example look at last years AAA and AA rosters. The Padres FO Sucks at drafting high end players.

Thanks for the name. And anyone blaming KT for not taking a trade with those as the arms involved is just dumb. KT never gets bullpen arms that way, never. He trades a Ben Johnson for a Heath Bell, is my point.

No one really knows what was offered, or demanded. As such we can not really blame either front office. But if the rumor is true about Flowers instead of Gorky/Schafer, I will be pissed. Thats not cause I do not believe catcher is a need, but i have serious doubts that Flowers defense will allow him to stay behind the plate. We do not need a 1st baseman.

DTogo, what team has 3 or 4 top of the rotation talents. First, the Padres drafted Cesar Carrillo who has top of the rotation stuff if he can work his way back from injury. Second, top of the rotation talent should not be a priority when you have a true number one starter in Peavy and a true number two starter in Chris Young. Next, who were they supposed to draft, it is not like they had the number 1 pick in every draft. You can only draft who is available when you draft. They invested money in Latin America signing some of the top pitching to start addressing the need.

DTogo, they suck as developing pitching, and selecting pitching. That is the truth. But high end players not so much, position players we have hit more and more.

3 years ago, we didn't have a 3rd baseman, now we have two. We have plenty of outfielders that are in the pipeline, no matter what you think, they might not be superstars in the waiting, but could be all solid everyday players. Keep in mind that we haven't had a top 10 pick since 2004, and that was the year before Fuson got here.

dt - not a fan of the Matt Bush (over Verlander and S. Drew) pick eh?

Um, bravesfan22193, I am not a Cubs fan.
I'm just saying that the reason the Padres said that they didn't think they could get a deal done with the Braves was because their offer was sub-par, and when you think about it, it was. Escobar is proven? Last season he had a tough year in what is considered a hitter's park. The production would fall playing in Petco. Gorkys is more upside than anything, something that isn't too appealing when trading a Cy Young Award winner. And those pitchers named? They might do better playing in Petco, but still, they are nothing more than 4/5th starters. That's why the Padres let the Braves drop out. While Towers thinks a deal with the Braves could get done, I doubt the Braves would want to pursue him any further.
It is going to be too hard to trade Peavy unless he would approve a trade to some other teams. The Cubs and Braves offers are not good. The Braves would have to include Hanson. To get a superstar, you will have to give up more than Yunel Escobar. The Cubs would have to include Vitters AND find a third team. Not happening.

That was made in 2004, before Fuson got here. And no, no one is happy with that draft. Verlander/Sowers/Hughes/Niemann/Hurley all would have been better picks in the first round.

123456789: that point of view is skewed. Hanson isnt going anywhere. When you trade a Peavy you want value, but you are not going to get equal value from one player. Its about finding a balance. A deal that would help the Padres in the long run is the objective.
A deal that gives an SS for 5 years, a CF of the future, and two rotation arms is fair. It takes a great player away, sure, but it adds more to the system than it removes. Thus fair from the Padres standpoint. (Depending on the arms involved)

I know this is will get beaten down, but this would be the best deal from the Padres standpoint. (this is not a rumor, just in my opinion a conjuncture)
Peavy for
Escobar/Schafer/Locke/Rohrbough

I'm going to start calling Towers Andy MacPhail. Talk about beating a dead horse. You've been given plenty of options. Either take the deal or move on. Don't waste peoples' time. Looks like the Braves and Cubs got sick of waiting. Good for them. I hope that the Padres, like the Twins last year, end up with a garbage last minute deal for Peavy just for jerking people around.

Airman SD:

"Escobar/Schafer/Locke/Rohrbough"

Sorry dude, isn't happening. I'm pretty sure your team prefers Gorkys Hernandez. And I haven't heard Schafer brought up in a while. I think the main parts of the deal have been agreed too, like Towers just said today.

Yunel Escobar, Gorkys Hernandez, Charlie Morton or Jo Jo Reyes and then Blaine Boyer.

That was the trade Towers rejected and asked for an additonal piece. I have a feeling that if the Braves added Locke to that deal, this thing would be done tomorrow. But Frank Wren won't have that.

cwilli Second, top of the rotation talent should not be a priority when you have a true number one starter in Peavy and a true number two starter in Chris Young.

Looked what happen when they Peavy and Young both went down this year. Just because Peavy and Young are with the Padres does not mean you do not draft type #1 and #2 pitchers. Also you can never have enough pitching. You do not anything about drafting players and either does the Padres.

NEBravesfan33, i know that we prefer Gorky, but we also said we wanted near MLB ready players. But you are right that the position player would be Escobar/Hernandez. But the pitchers were the hold up. And we wanted more upside than Morton, and a reliever is a joke for Peavy.

"You never know," Towers said. "We certainly made more progress with them. We were able to ID and agree upon a large part of the package."

Airman SD- I don't think the Braves are willing to give up both Rohrbough and Locke. Maybe one, but I doubt it. To be honest, I think Escobar, Hernandez, Morton and Boyer is the best offer you'll get.

I know this is will get beaten down, but this would be the best deal from the Padres standpoint. (this is not a rumor, just in my opinion a conjuncture)
Peavy for
Escobar/Schafer/Locke/Rohrbough

Posted by: AirmanSD | November 18, 2008 at 06:42 PM

That's nice that you would want all of that, but I doubt that will happen.

I think a more likely package the Padres will be offered will center around Flowers and Hernandez instead. Add in pitchers, Locke/Medlen and Reyes/Morton, I think that will be the deal.

"cwilli Second, top of the rotation talent should not be a priority when you have a true number one starter in Peavy and a true number two starter in Chris Young.

Looked what happen when they Peavy and Young both went down this year. Just because Peavy and Young are with the Padres does not mean you do not draft type #1 and #2 pitchers. Also you can never have enough pitching. You do not anything about drafting players and either does the Padres."

It is not an immediate organizational need. Thus you can do things like draft Mat Latos and sign international talent like they did this year getting 2 of the top international pitchers. Petco also has appeal to free agent pitchers and a lack of appeal to talented position playing talent. I am all for the team having 5 number one starters just in case a couple of them get hurt, but that is not realistic. Also suggest pitchers that they have passed on in their draft position over the last few years that you would want.

"Also suggest pitchers that they have passed on in their draft position over the last few years that you would want"

Tommy Hanson, maybe?

(sorry cwilli, couldn't resist - in fact, finding a guy like that in the 22nd round is part of the beauty/dumb luck of baseball).

Oh and can we please stop with the whole flowers will not be a big league catcher. Nobody knows for sure yet and according to this baseball executive, Flowers has the tools to be solidly defensively behind the plate.

"Flowers can catch and throw – he’s got a great arm. He’s just so big and strong, I sometimes wonder how he gets it all going. Is he going to be able to get rid of it quick. I’d like to see him work more on agility drills. But he’s driven to make himself better."

2 international pitchers. How about one? Adis Portillo is the top pitcher. Elvin Tavarez
is a diamond in the rough not a top pitcher. Nick Schmidt over Porcello good choice! Stop over rating the Padres farm system. They are not 12th bt Baseball America they are between 16-20 by Callis.

I've heard whispers Flowers might move off the plate?

Don't know how accurate that is, would obviously damage his value but he's still a good prospect.


I don't see how KT can possibly improve on any previous offer from Wren. He's shown such a willingness to trade Peavy it's destroyed any leverage he had.

Pocello signed a 7 million dollar deal, a ton of teams passed on him because of his price tag. Tavarez was the 10th rated international prospect, not just pitcher, so I am not sure what you want. Also I have not once said they have top minor league system, just simply that they had improved under the people you are trying to discredit. They go from the 30th ranked system to the 13th ranked system in one year and that is not good.

cwilli- they did not go from 13th to 30th in one year. A kid with a baseball america subscription can draft better than Fuson. Yes they improve they had how many supplemental pick did they have? We would be in the top 10 if we had

Hahaha

These Peavy rumor threads continue to get more and more ridiculous with each and every passing day. SD fans, you think somehow you are going to get more now? So Wren makes his best offer, KT says no thanks. That is fine, Wren says good luck and moves on. So because the Cubs signed Dempster (who is not an ace by the way) and the Yankees are rumored to be signing every FA just like the rumors are every year somehow SD has more leverage than they did before? That is laughable! If KT comes knocking on our door again it's obvious to everyone but SD fans that KT messed up, why would we give them more? He simply isn't going to be the same pitcher away from that park and if he wants a NTC and us to automatically pick up that option then his contract is no longer below market value. Peavy declined this season, outside of that park he isn't the same pitcher and he has now become an injury risk so I hope Wren offers even less and basically says take it or leave it or at worst settle for the original offer.

Peavy is still a very good pitcher, don't get me wrong, but with or without him we still need far to much help to be a contender and it's obvious to everyone outside SD (no surprise there) that he will decline once he leaves that park. I'd much rather us try to land Lowe first and then at least we know if we had Peavy we may have a shot at the division. Worst case scenario here is Wren pulls a Tex deal and we fail to sign any other FA. Best case scenario is we can sign Lowe or Burnett, we have preliminary talks with Furcal to make sure he does want to come to play for us and we have a tentative agreement and then KT takes at most the original deal (which was Escobar, Gorkys, Morton or Reyes and Boyer I think). It's obviously the best offer that has been leaked out and you can see the other teams just are not willing to top it with several reports saying the other teams feel his demands are simply to high.

Look folks, unless some other team comes out of nowhere, the Braves and Pads will get the deal done in time for turkey. Both GMs need to make it happen, and soon. My guess is the Pads will end up accepting Escobar, Morton/Reyes, Hernandez/Schafer, Boyer, AND Locke/Medlen/Rohrbough. SD gets a MLB-ready SS, an almost MLB-ready CF, a MLB-ready 3/4 SP, MLB-ready RP/closer, and a SP prospect.

I have a feeling Flowers will be used to get our LF - Maggs perhaps? Detroit needs a catcher. Maybe Flowers & Diaz?

Then the Braves sign Furcal to play SS and sign one of Wolf/Penny/Sheets.

Why would we give you Schafer + Lock, Medlen or Rohrbough when nobody was willing to top our original offer? You all are in complete denial here and if Wren does that then he continues to disappoint me as a GM. At least when JS pulled the trigger for Tex we were close to contending but got hammered with injuries. We may not even be a .500 team if the only addition we make is Peavy and have to give up Escobar and our #4 or #5 SP in Morton to land him. This isn't rocket science.

I agree with jfish. They are not going to sweeten the offer for Peavy. Wren Is already tired of dealing with Towers.

The Braves and us fans need to realize that they are in a build stage. Sure they are only a few pieces away, but they are rebuilding. Those piece are in the minors right now and just need to wait one or two years and then everything will fall into place. I understand their desire to compete each year, but there are way to many holes right now. Just keep what we have. Do not break it up. Trading Escobar is plain stupid.

And thundersticks, this 5 for 1 is ridiculous. Also the Tigers have already said Maggs is not on the market.

I hope Wren doesn't deal Escobar. Furcal has reportedly received offers equal to the 3-years $39 million the Braves we're unwilling to pay the last time he was a free agent. Renteria and Furcal are both going to go for 4-years, $60 million.

I would like to see what kind of package we would have to put together to bring Jermaine Dye back to Atlanta.

"Why would we give you Schafer + Lock, Medlen or Rohrbough when nobody was willing to top our original offer?"

My guess is that the answer to this question is THE BRAVES DIDNT GET PEAVY WITH THAT DEAL!!!!!!!!! Towers said yesterday that there is a very good chance Peavy will be our opening day starter. I wonder how much Peavy would command around July 31st next season.

Worst case for the Pads is they keep a top 5 starter.

Worst case for the Braves is they dont get AJ, Lowe, CC, or Sheets which is seeming more and more likely. If that happens, Braves fans can enjoy one of the worst rotations on the NL for 2009.

I never minded Braves fans until this whole thing. Arrogant and homers the lot of you. Your farm system is good but not the best ever. All but a few of your prospects have not even played in AA yet. The list of highly touted prospects that live up to the hype is far shorter than the ones who do not. I will laugh loud and hard if Hanson turns out like the other cant misses of Phil Hughes and Clay Buchholz.

I hope you guys enjoy throwing away 2009 because you didnt want to give up some projectable talent.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.