MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« Olney's Latest: Sabathia, Varitek | Main | Mark Teixeira Rumors: Sunday »

With Billingsley Hurt, Dodgers Eyeing Peavy?

Chad Billingsley slipped on ice, fell, and broke his leg according to Dylan Hernandez of the LA Times, spreading the Dodgers rotation thin as it stands.

"How this will affect the Dodgers' maneuverings in the free-agent and trade markets, if at all, is... uncertain. General Manager Ned Colletti was unavailable for comment Saturday night. With [Derek] Lowe and [Brad] Penny expected to sign elsewhere and Greg Maddux likely to retire, the Dodgers' rotation at this point consists of only Billingsley, Hiroki Kuroda and 20-year-old Clayton Kershaw."

Hernandez reports the Dodgers are saying he'll be ready for spring training. Buster Olney thinks that's what you say when you might suddenly be re-interested in front-end rotation depth, namely Jake Peavy.

The Dodgers had previously lost interest when Kevin Towers asked for a package including Billingsley.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053612aec0970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference With Billingsley Hurt, Dodgers Eyeing Peavy?:

Comments

Seriously. No injury to his pitching arm. The leg should very easily be ready by spring training.

Dodgers get:
Jake Peavy
Mike Lowell

Padres get:
Clay Buchholz
Scott Elbert
Manny Delcarmen
Blake DeWitt

Red Sox get:
Russel Martin

"Red Sox get:
Russel Martin"

Ok, so the Dodgers aren't trading Martin.

"Seriously. No injury to his pitching arm. The leg should very easily be ready by spring training."

Except that Bills has massive thighs. He also generates most of his power from his legs. This will, if nothing else, set him back in his conditioning program during the off season. Let's hope he strengthens his legs before he tries throwing, as that will lead to arm injuries.

that 3 way deal will never happen, but its actually not bad

If Lowell is healthy thats a pretty solid trade proposal. Bucholz and Delcarmen for Russell Martin ? Pretty good if you can get it.


Hey Tim, when are you going to do a Rule 5 preview ??? Thats comming up pretty soon.

He broke his fibula. according to thedisabledlist.com, it takes 6-8 weeks for recovery.

Come on Theo never give it up that much talent for Martin. Send Bowden instead,of Bucholtz then ok. Also sign Teixeira first. Seen both Bowden and Bucholtz pitch in Double AA, believe me you will be glad to have kept Bucholtz.

"Dodgers get:
Jake Peavy
Mike Lowell

Padres get:
Clay Buchholz
Scott Elbert
Manny Delcarmen
Blake DeWitt

Red Sox get:
Russel Martin"

I'll tell everyone whats wrong with this trade. Dodgers already have enough 3rd basemen. Padres don't want a 3rd baseman. Didn't Towers want atleast "two" starters? As Cyyoung wrote, to much to give up for Martin. Colletti already made it clear that Martin is going nowhere.

"Except that Bills has massive thighs. He also generates most of his power from his legs. This will, if nothing else, set him back in his conditioning program during the off season. Let's hope he strengthens his legs before he tries throwing, as that will lead to arm injuries."

Hmm, didn't know that. Thanks for info. Would probably be smart to have Bills miss his first start or so of the season, but beyond that, I don't think Billingsley will be out long enough for that alone to warrant a Peavy trade though.

BravesRed- The Dodgers don't have a third baseman. Casey Blake's an FA. Blake Dewitt can play at either 2B or 3B, and both are areas of need for LA.

Cyyoung- Russell Martin is a young, cheap, top 5 catcher in MLB. That package(Buchholz, Delcarmen, Lowell) is fair, if not inadequate, for Martin.

Although, that trade proposal is extremely ridiculous, because the Dodgers are giving up WAY too much for Peavy and Lowell. I probably wouldn't do Martin for Peavy straight up, and no way in h3ll I do Elbert, DeWitt, and Martin for Peavy and Lowell.

"spreading the Dodgers rotation thin as it stands"

... no pun intended?

Seriously though, there's certainly a good chance Peavy is traded, but to a division rival? How often does that kind of talent change hands in a division? Towers rightfully asked for a "package involving Billingsley," the Doders would certainly have to pay a premium.

Why are the Sox lusting after Tex so much? He doesn't seem like their kind of player. He's a me-first A-Rod lite kind of guy.

is there a time limit while posting here?

"Seriously though, there's certainly a good chance Peavy is traded, but to a division rival? How often does that kind of talent change hands in a division? Towers rightfully asked for a "package involving Billingsley," the Doders would certainly have to pay a premium."

Yes, and now Mr Broxton's name should start coming up much more often imagine and i beolieve he is more desireable and could bring in a lot in trade next year (or later on) in trades with other clubs. Broxton is young and one of the hardest throwers and dead-0n closers that should be closing have seen for quite some time.

Braves might be paying now for not wanting to give in and not giving up anything for Peavy now, the Dodgers really look like they need him now and will be more willing to give up Broxton than they were with a closer already on staff.

In 2007 saw Bucholz pitch against Matt Garza in Double AA Garza then with Twins farm team New Britain.
Bucholz 8IP 2H 12K'S 1BB
Garza 8IP 4H 9K"S 1BB
Bucholz won 1-0
Next day called up to Boston 2 starts later pitches no-hitter.
Eveybody giving up on this kid except me.

Ned Colletti: So whats it gonna take to get Jake Peavy?

Kevin Towers: Well, for starters.. Clayton Kershaw, Chad BIllingsly, Chin Ling Hu, James Mcdonald, Scott Elbert and Lambo

This shouldn't change anything for the Dodgers offseason plans. Billingsly is a kid and he'll be fine. Colletti shouldn't panic and overpay for Peavy. There's gotta be another FA pitcher or less expensive trade partner if the Dodgers feel they need to pick up another starter due to this injury.

If anything this will only increase the dodgers need for CC, seeing as he wont cost them players.

Sign Sheets - are you serious?

I doubt Padres will trade Gonzalez. Gonzalez, Peavy, and Headley for Billingsley and Martin? Are you serious? Towers will be fired if he did that trade and I think many people will think so too.

"Dodgers get,Adrian Gonzalez,Jake peavy,and Chase Headley
Padres get,Chad Billingsley,Russel Martin"

You're a Dodgers fan I assume.

Dodgers get:
Jake Peavy
Mike Lowell

Padres get:
Clay Buchholz
Scott Elbert
Manny Delcarmen
Blake DeWitt

Red Sox get:
Russel Martin


wooo hahaha. russel martin is not going anywhere except to bat 2 second for the dodgers.

i thought this stupid boston wet dream was over?

seriously doubt that the padres will want to trade him within the division. the only way that happens if dudgers give up kershaw mcdonald and another top prospect

you guys really dont give enough credit to colletti. he has constantly repeated"we arent trading martin or any of the young core thats been in the majors fo a consistent amount of time" because its a break and could be serious enough to miss time, mccourt will open his checkbook and sign cc, manny, a ss(furcal or cabrea, to allow dejesus jr to deveolpe) and sign a 5th starter, johnson, to allow mcdonald expierence in the pen before joing the rotation at some point.
the dodgers are in pretty good position, a SMART gm who is smart about his players and a HOF manager in torre. now we just need a smart owner

my gosh people billingsley is expected to be ready by spring training stop with the insane trade scenarios

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081122&content_id=3689204&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb

I highly doubt this will have a major impact on the Peavy trade. Though it does go to show you that anything can happen and things change. But the Padres would ask a premium for a division rival, and I doubt that the Dodgers would pay the price.

Add to the fact that they expect him back for ST its kind of a mute point. But whoever said that Billingsley needs his legs is right, he generates his power from his legs, so keep that in mind if he isnt the same right away next year.

i dont think peavy is worth a top prospect from the dodgers.

he most defiantly isnt worth one of bills, kershaw, or kemp, loney or martin.

And why isn't he worth a top prospect ? It's not like the dude has had an ERA below 3 and unanimously won a Cy Young award in 07, right ?

its not like he has a 4 era on the road right? his stats are so padded by petco. he gives up twice the homeruns, strikes out way less walks more. i dont know if you been to a dodger game during the day but balls fly out of there.
bills is a ace already
if kershaw was still a rookie he would be the number prospect in the game behind price
martin a 4-5(not too much power but still) tool catcher. umm those dont come around too much
kemp has all the talent in the world
and loney is going to throw up 330/25/110 easy for the next 5-6 years with gg defense.

i like peavy but not for anyofthem.

I agree with 661dodgerblue. I'll settle for one year deals on Sheets and Randy Johnson,re-sign Furcal and Manny, and we'll be fine!

i agree with airmansd's point about the injury.

The market for peavy is bad. There should be a great market for Peavy. Great pitchers don't usually get shopped like that when they're in their prime and signed to a good deal. Almost every team was once interested in trading for him, but that died down very quickly. It's just now heating up a little bit again in reference to teams seeing a peavy trade as a plan b if they miss out on CC/Lowe/Burnett. Why is this so?

It's bad in my opinion because:

1. Tower's initial overreaching in trade talks that scared away bidders.

2. Bad communication with Peavy's agent about where Peavy would waive his ntc to which caused an offer to float only to be shot down that day by the agent which depresses bidding.

3. Peavy's ntc itself

4. The uncertain ownership situation gives the padres little to no leverage. Teams are lowballing the padres because they are pretty certain they can. If they are right, the padres will eventually have to take the best offer from a team Jake will approve to be traded to.

Proof of #4 is that Peavy shot down the braves package of players. That would have been a starting point to drive up bidding for other teams, but Peavy drove down his own trade value.

It's more of a salary dump for san diego. Towers has to pretend it's not, but it is.

Peavy is only worth the most some other team is going to offer for him. Right now, that ain't more than that braves offer that Peavy shot down.

bigmac exactly,
why trade your young outstanding core for a pitcher who might turn into a 3.30 era guy which is great. but when you have to trade a pitcher who posted great numbers this year(bills) plus more players.
doesnt make sense.
i think peavy goes to braves still.

i think ned signs
randy johnson
manny
i really hope furcal
resign nomar to a utility role possibly playing 2nd
sign cruz to fill the hole left by saito, not to close but pitch the 7/8th innings
if cc wants to stay in the nl the dodgers are the favorites.
then trade pierre for something, he should start somewhere hes good for 162 games 180 hits and 50 stolen bases.

2 things on sheets. i dont think he can stay healthy. he has just had too many injuries. 2, he wouldnt accept a 1yr deal. someone will offer a 2 or 3 yr deal and hell take it. i really dont feel comfortable with a rotation of bills(coming of injury, to the legs, he uses so much), sheets(injuryprone and all), kuroda, kershaw(whos only 21, though he didnt look it), and johnson(whos 42, even though i personally like johnson for 1yr) we at least need to lowe, personally go for CC.

Offseason
manny-19m/yr(he wont get anything better, it sounds like no has even called saying "we are interested")
cc-22m/yr(i think hell go for the west if the #s are close
johnson-8m/1yr-solidify rotation losing lowe, penny, maddux
furcal-13m/4yrs- im taking a risk. but i think he stay and when dejesus is ready, have furcal/dejesus play 2b, other play ss, with dewitt at 2b
crede-6m/1yr- until dejesus is ready

this would cost 68m. the numbers prob arent exact, but the dodgers can easily raise payroll 10m

with dewitt at 2b*

at 3b

then trade pierre for something, he should start somewhere hes good for 162 games 180 hits and 50 stolen bases

some people feel that a lugo for pierre deal could happen. i personally think furcal is better and will help more, but a NL stint for lugo couldnt hurt him

"furcal-13m/4yrs"

You are going to pay Furcal 4/13? I hope Dodgers will have fun with that offer.

"manny-19m/yr"

Dodgers already offered him $22.5 million a year.

"some people feel that a lugo for pierre deal could happen. i personally think furcal is better and will help more, but a NL stint for lugo couldnt hurt him"

lugo was in the nl and stunk with the dodgers no less, and then he turned 280 abs with tb into that stupid deal with boston.

one thing theo hasnt done well is fill the shortstop position hopefully for him lowrie is the answer

i think sheets is worth a one maybe two year deal.

no more than that however.

"manny-19m/yr"

Dodgers already offered him $22.5 million a year.

yes, but no one seems to have contacted manny or boras. they pulled the offer but want to continue negotiations.if no one steps in and the dodgers offer 19m, boras will need to accept. its not like manny is 20 again and can say hell play in japan or something for a year. he's 36 and will prob take the highest contract.

"furcal-13m/4yrs"

You are going to pay Furcal 4/13? I hope Dodgers will have fun with that offer.

it was a guess, based on him saying he wont accept 3 yrs. id like to see a 4/13per contract, with the dodgers being able to buy it out and not be responible after the first year if he hurts his ankle or back again.

"some people feel that a lugo for pierre deal could happen. i personally think furcal is better and will help more, but a NL stint for lugo couldnt hurt him"

lugo was in the nl and stunk with the dodgers no less, and then he turned 280 abs with tb into that stupid deal with boston.

all i was saying is the nl west is easier on a hitter than the al east, so a tour of the nl west COULD help, but not neccesisarily help

lakers,

i agree with what you have to say except the lugo trade, i think the dodgers should trade him and eat about 5 million a year, and not take a bad contract back. pierre is worth something better than lugo if you chip in on the contract. i honestly wouldnt mind keeping him but theres just too much in the outfield.

"GM Kevin Towers is asking for young pitching and lots of it, particularly from the Dodgers, with whom they share the NL West. So, assume Towers is going for two or three pitchers from a pool including Clayton Kershaw, Chad Billingsley, Jonathan Broxton and James McDonald, or two of them and a young position player such as Matt Kemp."
eww vomit
okay well its safe to say he will not be coming to the dodgers.

According to the reports, Billingsley is expected to fully recover in time for Spring Training and the start of the season. I don't seem them completely freaking just yet.

""GM Kevin Towers is asking for young pitching and lots of it, particularly from the Dodgers, with whom they share the NL West. So, assume Towers is going for two or three pitchers from a pool including Clayton Kershaw, Chad Billingsley, Jonathan Broxton and James McDonald, or two of them and a young position player such as Matt Kemp."

Trading even one of Billingsley or Kershaw is a fireable offense. Actually, it should be the signature on Ned Colletti's pink slip.

Cheaper alternative....ship Juan Pierre and a prospect to the White Sox for Javier Vazquez. If the Dodgers have to eat some salary then so be it. Pierre would give the Sox some speed at the top of the lineup and is a better alternative over Anderson anyways. Its a win/win for both teams IMO

"Cheaper alternative....ship Juan Pierre and a prospect to the White Sox for Javier Vazquez. If the Dodgers have to eat some salary then so be it. Pierre would give the Sox some speed at the top of the lineup and is a better alternative over Anderson anyways. Its a win/win for both teams IMO"

i like that alot actually. how many years does javy have left?

"Trading even one of Billingsley or Kershaw is a fireable offense. Actually, it should be the signature on Ned Colletti's pink slip."

yeah youre telling me.
towers would ask "are you sure?!"

Vazquez has 2 years and $23 million left on his contract. exactly 11.5 per

Pierre has "$10 million each in 2009 and 2010, and $8.5 million in 2011." according to ESPN. Seems like an even swap to me....

ehh yeah, i guess we would have to give something up for the salary.

maybe pierre and andruw jones.
im just kidding


but maybe throw in orenduff?

Bear0930pg thank you for the info

I'd say a reliever of some sort, as I'm sure the White Sox could use it. Maybe a mid-tier relief prospect is sufficient. In any matter it would benefit both clubs as well as players. Pierre wants to start and Vazquez would prefer West Coast.

Also, this is the better alternative as opposed to trading for Jake Peavy who would definitely take much more to acquire. Not only that but I'm positive Vazquez would benefit from pitching in LA.

the more you think about this article the dumber it sounds.

the dodgers have lost a lot of pitching depth.. so TRADE away two or three of your pitchers and recieve one.

trade one who gave you 200 innings plus a top 5 prospect plus more! for a guy who averages 210 innings..
and isnt the same pitcher outside of SD

"yeah youre telling me.
towers would ask "are you sure?!" "

Not really. He'd just sign the deal before the stupid wore off Coletti. Billingsley is easily worth more than Peavy.

I'd think that the prospect going to the Sox in a Pierre-Vazquez swap would have to be a decent one (I'm thinking an Elbert type, maybe a bit less). Vazquez is worth more than Pierre, and even if salary is eaten on Pierre's part, still needs to be more value going to the Sox.

And, you can make a case for Kershaw being worth as much as Peavy.

Hell, I'd wander off on a limb and say that Clayton's equal to Peavy in terms of value.

CC oh baby i can only hope
bills
kuroda
vazquez
kershaw
mcdonald

i can dig it

if they want middle relief
troncoso or even brazoban and something else

melonis,

exactly you dont trade up and coming talent like the dodgers have for a one arm.

i wonder if KW would make that deal though, i know Ned would.

"I'd think that the prospect going to the Sox in a Pierre-Vazquez swap would have to be a decent one (I'm thinking an Elbert type, maybe a bit less). Vazquez is worth more than Pierre, and even if salary is eaten on Pierre's part, still needs to be more value going to the Sox."

Vazquez is worth more because he is a starter, but they are really roughly equal. His K/BB ratio is great, but his propensity toward homers won't really change at Dodger Stadium, which off sets its large field with walls that do allow home runs at a pretty strong clip.

I think Pierre + Elbert for Vazquez straight up, no money involved, is a good deal for both teams.

"i wonder if KW would make that deal though, i know Ned would."

KW and Ozzie both like Pierre-type players and tend to get the best out of them. The ChiSox can use a little extra team speed and Pierre's defense in CF (don't let his crap arm fool you, his speed and instincts make him a net positive defender statistically) allows them to put Swisher at 1B or a corner and move either Dye or Konerko. Also, I fully believe that a motivated Juan Pierre is well capable of a .350 OBP that is primarily BA driven.

Ugh. Sorry about my last post including Swisher. I have been out of the country and didn't see that news until after the post.

Pierre and Troncoso is probably sufficient I'd say. Now if i could just get Ned and KW to agree, it would make it even better...

"Pierre wants to start and Vazquez would prefer West Coast."

This is false. Vazquez does NOT like the West Coast. In fact, he demanded a trade from the Diamondbacks to a more East Coast team after the 2005 season. I'm not sure, but he may have a partial NTC, and if he does, it includes West Coast teams.
As for the talk about Sheets being injured all the time, Sheets pitched 141.3 and 198.3 innings the past two seasons. His ERA+ was 117 and 139. Compare that to Derek Lowe who pitched 199.3 and 211 and had an ERA+ of 118 and 131 over the past two seasons. While Sheets may pitch fewer innings, he'd be perfect to take Lowe's roster spot. Also, for as "brittle" as Sheets was, Hiroki Kuroda only pitched 183.3 innings last season.
For the off season, I'd love to see these moves by Ned:
1. Sign Manny to 3 years/$69 mil. + $25 mil vesting option.
2. Sign Furcal to 3 years/$39 mil. + dual option for a fourth year ($500K player opt out/$3 mil. team opt out)
3. Sign Sheets for 3 year/ $45 mil.
4. Sign Randy Johnson for 1 year/ $8 mil.
5. Trade Pierre to White Sox or Reds for relief pitching or projectable minor leaguers that could be the next Cory Wade. Or Bronson Arroyo if he's available.
6. Sign Orlando Hudson to 4 year/$40 mill.
7. Make Blake DeWitt the starting 3B.
8. Resign Nomar to 1 year/$5 mil. as super-sub utility infielder.

This would give us one of the top infield defenses in baseball. DeWitt and Nomar could platoon at 3rd. Our outfield would be phenomenal with Manny, Kemp and Ethier, with Andruw Jones ready for spot duty if he can prove in Winter Ball he can hit (and would be a wonderful bat against AL teams as we shift Manny to DH, Jones to CF, Kemp to RF and Ethier to LF).
Pitching rotation:
1. Ben Sheets
2. Chad Billingsley
3. Hiroki Kuroda
4. Clayton Kershaw
5. Randy Johnson
Injury replacement starters:
6. Jason Schmidt
7. James McDonald

Bullpen:
Jonathan Broxton
Hong-Chih Kuo
Cory Wade
Scott Elbert
Scott Proctor
(James McDonald when not starting)
Ramon Troncoso

"Pierre's defense in CF (don't let his crap arm fool you, his speed and instincts make him a net positive defender statistically)"

Have you ever watched Pierre play CF? He has HORRIBLE instincts. He also takes bad routes to the ball. The only thing that keeps him alive defensively is his speed. Add his arm into play and he's putrid defensively. But hey, whatever it takes to get him on another team if he's hell-bent on starting. He's a great 4th OF. Too bad he thinks he's a starter.

DodgersBruin, those deals would make them a good team, but the chances of that all happening are nil. So the number 1 rated outfield, the number 1 rated 2b, the number 1 rated SS and a top 5 pitcher on the market all take deals with the same club. Not likely. Other teams are going to go hard after some of those players, like the A's/Giants for Furcal.
Its a nice dream, but its a dream. Realistically they have could maybe sign two of those players, say Sheets and Manny.

The Dodgers would just be re-signing Manny and Furcal. So those two players aren't as much of a stretch to sign since negotiations have already begun with their agents. No one seems to be looking at Manny for over 3 years. No one is offering Furcal 4 years, which is what he wants (and would essentially get with the dual option from the Dodgers). Not many teams would offer Sheets a 3 year deal. The biggest stretch would be Hudson, although I don't know what teams are really looking at him, especially if the Mets are intent on keeping Castillo.

And Randy Johnson isn't a stretch to sign since he went to college in LA, has a history with Torre, and I believe has expressed interest in coming to the Dodgers now that the Diamondbacks have refused to offer him a contract.

DodgersBruin, maybe I just misread about the whole Vazquez thing. It would still be a good trade. In response to what you said the chances of the Dodgers signing all those players just isnt good at all. Do you realize how much payroll goes up if you sign all those guys. Even if you take the money saved from all the free agents, its a bit ridiculous to sign all of them. I'm thinking the Dodgers ultimately sign Orlando Cabrera to play SS over Raffy. I think Manny is a lock to be resigned. Orlando Hudson would be a nice add but not for 5 years nor for 10 mil a season. Ben Sheets is a bit farfetched. Randy Johnson I can definitely see. In fact if the Dodgers dont sign him I'd be disappointed. The Dodgers would have to move a few guys in order to consider adding all the payroll. They have Pierre and Jones still riding pine, not to mention the money owed to Schmidt.

If the Dodgers were able to move Pierre without picking up any salary and if they made my signings, the payroll next season would be around $135MM. This would include the $15M to Schmidt and $21M to Jones. Also, with Manny, Furcal and Sheets on 3 year deals and Hudson on a 4 year deal, it's not like the Dodgers couldn't backload a couple of the deals by one year. Say Manny gets $18M this season and $26M each of the last two seasons, along with Furcal getting $10M this season and $15 the last two seasons. That would lower payroll enough that the Dodgers shouldn't have any problems. And the Dodgers wouldn't have to dip back into the free agent market next season because they'd have all starting position players back (Andruw Jones would be the only player gone) as well as their top 4 SPs back (losing Schmidt and Randy Johnson), but allowing them to slide James McDonald into the #5 spot full time for 2010.
The Dodgers had a $120MM payroll this past season, and while it would go up slightly this season, with essentially the same team in 2010, the payroll would drop $48M with Jones, Schmidt, Nomar and Johnson coming off the payroll.
Before the 2011 season, Kuroda's contract would be up freeing another $11M or so.
Even with arbitration eligible younger players, over the next 3 seasons the Dodgers could have payroll around $135M, $100M and $110M. This team would make the playoffs all 3 years and would be in great shape to win the World Series in at least one of those three years.

I love what Sheets does when he's on the mound. I think he's a steal at $15M a year for 150 innings. He's dominant in those innings and if you can put him on the DL in July or August so he's healthy for the playoffs, it's perfect. I also think that if Hudson can maintain a .350 OBP while providing GG defense he's worth $10M for 4 years.
I think if McCourt is really interested in winning the World Series, or even getting to the playoffs every year so he can maximize profits for the club he'll sign these players instead of throwing money at CC Sabathia. With Logan White's ability to draft the Dodgers have an endless supply of pitchers coming up through the ranks that can fill in for any short term in season injuries that could make the next 3 years special.

"Have you ever watched Pierre play CF? He has HORRIBLE instincts."

Ugh. I, and the plus/minus people, have apparently watched Pierre more than you have.

"Ugh. I, and the plus/minus people, have apparently watched Pierre more than you have."

I've seen every Dodger game over the past 5 years. And the one play that I think epitomizes Pierre's defense was opening day 2007 against the Brewers. Corey Hart hit a shallow ball that dropped for a hit. Pierre backed up originally, then raced forward, the ball landing no more than 50 feet from the infield dirt. Still, Hart was able to turn this bloop single into a double based off Pierre's initial reaction to the ball and his noodle arm.
You can cite the plus/minus system all you want. Pierre is not a good defensive outfielder.

DodgerBruin, if you want to think its possible it is, not likely but possible. Manny for one was asking for 4 years 100 million right, well if you are not giving him 4 years, he is going to make sure he gets his 25 mil/per. Even at your salaries without Pierre its 108.1 million in 9 players or as much as 118.1 in 10 if Pierre is not able to be dealt without picking up some salary (btw Jones makes 15 million next year, plus 7.1 million in signing bonus over the next two thats added into the total above). After that you have arbitration due to Martin, Ethier, Saito, Broxton, Proctor, and Brazoban. Given that and you still would need to add some 400K type players to round out the roster. So add anywhere for 10-20 million for those guys, and you still have about 9-10 guys making close to league min, so about 3.6-4 million more.

In other words without Pierre, and the lower end of the arb scale it would be 122 million, so its possible, but if the other is true it could be as much as 144 million.

DodgersBruin is annointed the new Dodger GM if he completes his deals. The only part that would concern me is the 3yr deal to Sheets, I think I would rather have Lowe if it's going to be a multi-year deal.

As the new GM...Promise that you will never bring back Julio Lugo!!

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.