![]() |
|
|
| |
« Marlins Catcher Rumors | Main | Red Sox Interested In Pettitte, Pavano, Penny »
5:22pm: Heyman says the Yankees are negotiating with Boras about a four-year deal for more than $65MM.
1:19pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman says the Phillies and Yankees lead the charge for Lowe, who wants $80MM over five years. A team official for one club told Heyman he was "shocked" with the escalating bidding.
8:34am: According to Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe, a Phillies official denied the presence of a three-year offer for Derek Lowe. Does this mean they have two or four years on the table? Cafardo talked to another source who said Lowe likes the idea of pitching for Philly.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053652e2b4970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Derek Lowe Rumors: Tuesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Ruben better not give Lowe 4 years and 65-70 million. He will completely blow any reasonable price and chance for Hamels to continue past his arbitration years. Plus he has to worry about LF. The only way he does it is if he gets DeRosa and saves $$ in left field, although I'm betting the Mets, yankees and Red Sox will have something to say about it. Don't get in a bidding war Ruben, you will lose!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 08:38 AM
No way the Phillies have a four year deal on the table.
They probably offered 2/30 which would probably be breaking the bank for their standards considering they don't want to pay Moyer 2/20.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 09, 2008 at 08:40 AM
i would rather have lowe than moyer. and if cost a little more than im all for it. the window is going to shut for the phils fast with the core players aging.
Posted by: derman1984 | December 09, 2008 at 08:44 AM
I believe the Phils have a 2-yr deal out for Lowe with a 3rd year option that may kick in with certain Starts/Innings Pitched.
Someone will probably offer him at least 3yrs/45 Mil guaranteed though.
Posted by: Phils Swiss! | December 09, 2008 at 08:47 AM
I'd also rather have Lowe than Moyer. There's no way the Phillies will give him the 2yr/18 Mil he's asking for.
They should have probably offered both he and Burrell arbitration. 1 Yr of Moyer at 8-10 million would have been ok IMO.
Posted by: Phils Swiss! | December 09, 2008 at 08:49 AM
"i would rather have lowe than moyer. and if cost a little more than im all for it. the window is going to shut for the phils fast with the core players aging."
Worrying about that "window" is what makes a team have 5-10 years of futility. There's no need to dish out bad contracts because you're afraid of the future, especially when you're defending World Champions. The Phillies still have 4-5 years of their core and their farm is starting to get more respectable every year. No need to panic.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 09, 2008 at 08:53 AM
phils fans-you guys thinking maybe marquis and derosa heading your way? assuming the cubs pay $4 mil of marquis' salary, that'd be a little over 10 million for the both of them. you'd be replacing moyer and burrell with lesser versions of each, assuming you lose both of them. i don't know moyer's number off-hand, but the guy is 45 years old asking for almost 10 million a year. is he really that much better than marquis?
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | December 09, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Moyer went 16 - 7 with a 3.71 ERA in half his game were at Citizens Bank Park (Bandbox!).
I would say Moyer is signifcantly better than Marquis, even if he is 46 years old. DeRosa is a nice player with versatility. A super utility player that would help any club.
Posted by: Phils Swiss! | December 09, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Marquis would be a bad match for the Phillies considering his tendency to let up the HR ball. That's a major factor when he's going to pitch 15-20 games at CBP.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 09, 2008 at 09:05 AM
100backeduptrucks,
we want no part of Marquis. We have plenty of middling 5th starters, we don't need more. and why would we do that to help you guys get Peavy when you had the NL's best regular season record.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 09:05 AM
If we could get Derosa and Marquis and trade Eaton back to the Cubbies, I'd be willing to do that.
Maybe they would throw Jenkins and his seven million dollar salary to the Cubs as well.
That would give the Cubs the LH hitting OF they're looking for, and that would spare some cash for us to possibly sign D Lowe and Moyer.
If we give up Haap, Jenkins, and Eaton for Marquis and DeRosa, that would be awesome!
However, it sounds more like a dream to me!
Posted by: Phils Swiss! | December 09, 2008 at 09:11 AM
philsws-forgot about eaton and i don't know what the deal is with kendrick. fair enough. my point was, though, that i know marquis has a bad reputation, and i've been the first to admit i don't trust him. however, when we first signed him, everyone said how he'd get lit up at wrigley. well, he's done exactly what he's always done: eat innings, get in jams, but more often than not, get out of those jams without too much damage. i don't know he does it sometimes, but he does. so while he is nothing more than a 5th starter, and an expensive one, is he not a better option than what you've got? and i'm sorry, moyer for 10 million a year, when you can get marquis and derosa for just about the same, i'll take marquis and derosa. i don't know how your guys' payroll is, but you'd probably still have money left to give to lowe or somebody like that to put between hamels and blanton (you guys still have blanton for next year, right?)
the whole reason for moving those two guys is to clear payroll for peavy and a left bat to play right, not because of performance (especially not derosa). if you get derosa, you'll love him. by helping us clear payroll, you are helping us get peavy, sorry to say...
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | December 09, 2008 at 09:44 AM
*should read left-handed bat.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | December 09, 2008 at 09:45 AM
There was a report out that the Philles are now talking to the Padres about getting Peavy.
The Padres said they like a lot of our young guys in our organization, but a top tier reliever would have to be included in the package, there's no proof, but my instinct says that if the Phillies were to put up Ryan Madson, J.A. Happ and Jason Donald for Peavy, that may be enough to get it done, maybe even throwing in Kendrick (who at 10-5 and 11-9 in the past 2 years isn't a joke)
Makes all the sense in the world for the Padres to look at that offer. Happ is a 12 game winner at least, Hendrick is 21-10 the past 2 years, Madson is yop set-up man, coming to be a closer soon, and Donald would replace the departed Greene.
Posted by: FyreKnight | December 09, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Madson to a "top" set-up man, not yop, sorry.
If the Phillies are the "3rd" team in a Cubs-Padres trade, getting DeRosa makes all the sense in the world seeing as he would start the year at 2nd base until Utley came back, and then would become the RH solution in RF with Jenkins and Stairs as Werth moves to full-time LF. Keep Dobbs/Feliz platoon going.
"IF" Cubs eat MOST of Marquis pay, then and only thern do we take him.
The Bill James 2009 Projections has Marquis at:
10-9 / 162 IP / 166 H / 66 BB / 96 K / 4.61 ERA
The past 2 years, the Phillies #5 starters (Eaton in 2007 went 10-10 and Kendrick in 2008 went 11-9) - so Marquis looks to be "even" on the Eaton/Kendrick stats of the past 2 years as far as W/L goes.
Posted by: FyreKnight | December 09, 2008 at 10:11 AM
100backeduptrucks,
Yes blanton is arb eligible so he'll get a bump along with a bunch of others.
I'll take Derosa but I'll be upset we're helping you and as FyreKnight says, why not send Hamels to try to convince Peavy to come to Philly. And while I like your thinking FyreKnight, i think any philly deal directly with the Padres would have to include as a centerpiece Carrasco which would make me at least pause. I'd want to be sure that Drabek could be up in 2+ years to replace what we'd be losing in Carrasco.
If we offered Carrasco, Madson, Kendrick and Donald that would be much more than the Cubs are offering. Then its just getting Peavy to agree to come here.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Yeah... you may be right about adding Carrasco..however the Padres are trying to unload Peavy only because of his salary... its a salary dump, and if we were to add Carrasco, then I'd also agree, that would be the Padres BEST offer so far for Peavy.
Carrasco, Happ, Donald and Madson.
I think maybe Padres send us a minor-league player in as well or a middle inning reliever.
Posted by: FyreKnight | December 09, 2008 at 10:50 AM
If i'm the Phils ( Ruben Amaro), i'm in Camp Peavy trying everything I can to convince Peavy to accept a trade to Philly... We have the pitching to get the deal done and Hamels, Peavy, Myers, Blanton, insert here looks as formidable as any in baseball...
Posted by: allabouthephils | December 09, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Plus, if you're willing to spend the 12-15MM a year on D-Lowe then why not spend the money on Peavy... There is essentially no difference in salary, especially when you consider production...
Posted by: allabouthephils | December 09, 2008 at 01:38 PM
allabouthephils,
i agree 100%. in fact Peavy's cheaper at the onset of the contract. That's where you go. Heck I'd even deal with Eaton every 5 days as long as i don't see him on the games i go to in my partial season package.
Well alright maybe Kendrick, not eaton.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 01:54 PM
i dont think with the events of what happened with towers messing up with the braves that you would have to include Carrasco. Donald is a young cheap option for ss madson a very good relief pitcher ready to become a closer, happ and throw in an outfielder prospect i think could you land peavy, they would just have to get him to waive his ntc
Posted by: derman1984 | December 09, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Phillies are another team that might want to take a look at Randy Johnson as a cheap #5 alternative, he's bound to put up better numbers than marquis and even if they can get the Cubs to pay 1/3 of his contract, the cost will be about the same. Might take a look at Japanese imports kawakami and Uehele also as back of the rotation guys.
Posted by: johns | December 09, 2008 at 02:08 PM
16mm+ for 4 years? The Yanks are a joke. Isnt he 35?...ehh the Yanks never seem to disappont me with their overpaying and brainless ways.
Posted by: clarknaddison | December 09, 2008 at 05:47 PM
Gotta do what you gotta do. They have the advantage with money, so why not exploit it?
Posted by: hiya | December 09, 2008 at 06:09 PM
Yankees are negotiating with Boras about a four-year deal for more than $65MM
...how is this humanely possible..am i the only sane one left...
Derek Lowe is a joke...he's should not even be top 2 guy in ANY rotation in baseball..and someone(multiple) is offering him a min of $!6 mi!! a year??
sign me up...i can throw 85 with mediocre control
Posted by: cubbies | December 09, 2008 at 06:33 PM
Yankees must be crazy. Lowe is going to hit so hard is not even funny.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 09, 2008 at 07:01 PM
"sign me up...i can throw 85 with mediocre control"
Are you lefthanded? Because soft-tossing righties don't get $16M a year. They have to somehow scrape by on $16M over three years. ;-)
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 10, 2008 at 02:20 PM