![]() |
|
|
| |
« Perrotto's Latest: Dye, Jenks, Werth, Madson | Main | Giants Considering Offer For Sabathia? »
According to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the Mariners have made closer J.J. Putz available. The Mets will talk with the Ms about him at next week's Meetings, but the Indians and other clubs will likely get involved. It sounds like the Mets would be happy to acquire Putz rather than give four years to Francisco Rodriguez/Brian Fuentes or three to Kerry Wood. Matthew Cerrone has more on the Mets' bullpen plans here.
Putz, 32 in February, posted a 3.88 ERA in 46.1 innings this year. He struggled with his control, and hits dropped it at an inordinate rate. His average fastball velocity remained around 95 mph despite ribcage and elbow injuries. He's set to earn just $5MM in '09 with an $8.6MM club option for '10. Putz could be a great pickup, as he was flat-out dominant from 2006-07.
Sherman adds that the Rays offered Chad Bradford to the Mets, hoping to move his $3.5MM salary. His salary doesn't suit the Mets either, though.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053637c0d5970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mariners Make Putz Available:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The Mariners asked for alot when it was Jarred Washburn, imagine what they would ask for with J.J. Putz. Putz could probably do well in the NL but again, the Mets would need to give up some good prospects I don't think the Mets should do when they have closers on the free agent market that wouldn't cost you prospects.
Mets don't have the strongest farm either. They have who? Parnell, Kunz, Fernando Martinez and Jon Niese? That's who the Mariners are going to be targeting and I seriously doubt the Mets want to give away that much for Putz.
Posted by: Steven | December 04, 2008 at 08:48 AM
I'd stay away if I were the Mets. If the Mariners wanted F-Mart and either Niese or Parnell for Ibanez I can't even imagine their asking price for Putz.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | December 04, 2008 at 08:49 AM
Hey Tim.... "gaay.com" advertising on your site? Really?
Not that theres anything wrong with it....
Posted by: Xycosis | December 04, 2008 at 08:51 AM
And I don't know about anybody else....but I'd rather have Kerry Wood than JJ Putz. Because for one, it'd be just the Mets luck that the minute that they trade for him, he either gets shelled by the NL, or he gets hurt very early into the season.
Also, I'd just like to add that the Cubs were stupid in not offering arbitration to Kerry Wood, whether they are tight on payroll or not. The 1-2 punch of Marmol and Wood was one of the best in baseball last year, and I don't believe Marmol can handle the pressure of being a closer.
But that's just my opinion.
Posted by: CubsForgas | December 04, 2008 at 08:52 AM
G.M.'s are going to be able to drive F. Rodriquez's dollar and year demands down even further.
Posted by: MickS | December 04, 2008 at 08:52 AM
"I'd stay away if I were the Mets. If the Mariners wanted F-Mart and either Niese or Parnell for Ibanez I can't even imagine their asking price for Putz."
The Mariners have a new GM. Obviously, Lee Pelokudos (sp?), as an interim GM, would ask the moon for Ibanez/Washburn (although Washburn was Lincoln/Armstrong, and they are still there, so meh), but GMZ is probably different and will probably be more reasonable.
The Rays should trade Wheeler, not Bradford. And, why do they want to move ChadBrad's salary again? WHY?
Posted by: melonis rex | December 04, 2008 at 08:53 AM
Who would close for Sea? Kerry Wood?
Posted by: Ted Williams | December 04, 2008 at 08:57 AM
"The 1-2 punch of Marmol and Wood was one of the best in baseball last year, and I don't believe Marmol can handle the pressure of being a closer."
That's why they got Gregg.
I bet the Mariners would ask for Kelly Shoppach in addition to two high-level prospects. No thank you.
Posted by: Big Papa Mays | December 04, 2008 at 09:01 AM
Mets need to stop being concerned with salary. THey have a new stadium in NYC with their own TV network, 3.5 million shouldn't scare them away from a solid reliever!!!
And I agree that the Mets shouldn't trade prospects for a closer when there are so many closers available for just money.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 04, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Lots of closers out there. Someone may get a pretty good deal on K-Rod.
Posted by: scottandwtb | December 04, 2008 at 09:04 AM
A Putz in New York sounds like a perfect scenario. I would figure it would be the Yankees not Mets, who want a Putz.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 04, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Well, Big_Papa_Mays,
Peter Gammons had reported on Sportscenter, I believe a day or 2 ago that Gregg will be setting up Marmol...
And as a cubs fan, that's kind of scary to me.
Posted by: CubsForgas | December 04, 2008 at 09:10 AM
I stand corrected. Didn't hear that...I'm sure there's flexibility there, though. If Marmol doesn't work they can swap roles.
Posted by: Big Papa Mays | December 04, 2008 at 09:13 AM
Seattle wouldn't want Kelly Shoppach from Cleveland. They already have Jeff Clement, Kenji Johjima, Rob Johnson and Adam Moore.
What the Mariners may well be after in exchange for Putz is a young position player and/or a prospect, but I doubt they will be shopping for a catcher.
Posted by: Slothcliff Hokum | December 04, 2008 at 09:17 AM
I'm a fan of both Chad Bradford and JJ Putz. I see guys like Bob Howry and Jeremy Affeldt signing at affordable rates, and it leads me to believe that Omar will be stupid enough to just attempt to krazy-glue the bullpen by giving Francisco Rodriguez some ridiculous contract and thinking the bullpen will be okay with the usual suspects in '09. This is unbelievable.
Just think about it already - the Mets could've had Feliciano and Heilman for Street, the opportunity to keep Luis Ayala via arbitration, and then Bradford for a prospect with the expectation of taking on Bradford's contract.
I'd already feel better with Joe Smith, a 25 year old Huston Street, Chad Bradford, Luis Ayala, Brian Stokes, Scott Schoeneweis' GREAT contract as the main LOOGY, and the opportunity for Kunz or Parnell to contribute next year with only a couple more million coming on the books from those deals with plenty of money being left over to pick up that free agent closer or big-time hitter.
Omar, wake up already!!
Posted by: MattyMets | December 04, 2008 at 09:20 AM
Not familiar with that ad...shoot me a screenshot if possible.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 04, 2008 at 09:25 AM
I think the Mets are throwing these trade rumors out there to get the price down on K-Rod or Fuentes (or both).
There's no reason to be trading prospects for a closer when there's several available without losing any players.
With the Mets moving into a new Park next year, I find it hard to believe they're not willing to spend.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 04, 2008 at 09:26 AM
I think Mets are better off singing one of the free agents. Why give prospect for one when there is about 5 of them out there. And I would expect the M's to want a alot for this guy.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 04, 2008 at 09:27 AM
Bradford had good traditional numbers with the Rays but all of the other numbers says those are not sustainable and that he was lucky, good move on the Rays behalf trying to dump him and his salary.
Posted by: CubFanRaysaddict | December 04, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Mets are dumb to not consider bradford based on salary. They need bullpen help and could probably get him for next to nothing.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 04, 2008 at 09:57 AM
''Mets are dumb to not consider bradford based on salary. They need bullpen help and could probably get him for next to nothing.''
I would have to agree. I am aware that Bradford is not very effective against lefties and him and Joe Smith are similar pitchers, but he's been dependable for quite a while now as a middle reliever.
I don't get it - Omar Minaya could spend a few million on a 'roided-up Guillermo Mota, $8 million on a 41 year old Moises Alou and $24 million on a declining and clearly injured Luis Castillo but he can't roll the dice and spend a few million on a reliever with a combined ERA under 3 since 2005? I can't argue with results and the opportunity to actually get some new blood in this bullpen, whether or not it is a familiar face. I know a lot of Mets fans (including myself) that thought losing Bradford was a mistake back in 2006.
''I think the Mets are throwing these trade rumors out there to get the price down on K-Rod or Fuentes (or both).''
I would agree to this on a condition. If this is true and it comes down to $40 million from either the Mets or the Angels, I would think that K-Rod is headed back to Los Angeles. If K-Rod is going to come to New York, I really think it will be about money and nothing more.
Posted by: MattyMets | December 04, 2008 at 10:17 AM
"Bradford had good traditional numbers with the Rays but all of the other numbers says those are not sustainable and that he was lucky, good move on the Rays behalf trying to dump him and his salary."
He's sustained them pretty well over his career, that's for damn sure. And he hasn't been pitching in cupcake divisions for most of his career. There is no reason he won't sustain them in 2009, and he's at market value for '09, unless the market REALLY hits the floor.
There is no reason that the Rays should trade him, especially with Percival's status up in the air. The Rays need to ADD bullpen help, not subtract it. Unless they're targetting a big fish like Fuentes, there's zero reason to trade Bradford.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 04, 2008 at 11:49 AM
I think the Mariners would be after Daniel Murphy plus probably a young pitcher for Putz. Murphey would be a nice replacement for Beltre when he gets dealt.
I also think the Mets are just using the Mariners to try and get K-Rod to drop his demands. Its a little silly (and transparent) to act like you want to give up 2-3 quality players for a guy like Putz when you can get K-Rod for $$$.. Even though its riskier and an overpayment over the long term.
Posted by: thr33niL | December 04, 2008 at 12:14 PM
I'd take 2 years of Putz over 4 years of KRod any day of the week. KRod, despite the saves, had a declining year. His velocity on his pitches was down, his strike outs were down, and his hits allowed were up. Why would anybody want to pay for that? In all probability he's not going to randomly throw 4 MPH faster next season.
No thanks.
As I Mariners fan, I want FMart straight up for Putz.
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | December 04, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Omar is most certainly driving down the price on KRod and Fuentes with trades, but I also think he plans on pulling the trigger. Dont forget we need a setup man as well.
I keep hearing ppl hating on Omar for not trading Heilmann and Feliciano for Street, bottom line is that we dont actually know that was a done deal. Not to mention, a good GM would try and switch feliciano for Show to see if that would work for the rockies. The bottom line is though, none of us really know what happened there so we should just forget about it.
As for Putz, while I think he would be a great addition to the pen I would feel more comfortable with KRod or Fuentes on a 3 year deal. I think the end result should be about 3/40 on KRod and 3/33 for fuentes, in which i sign Krod and then trade for street if possible.
Also does anyone think it would be possible to sign Wood as a Setup man? would he want too much money? even on a 3 year deal? maybe 3/18? or even 2/14?
I know we are gonna get our closer, my main worry is who will be setting up the mystery man!!
Posted by: Fish&Mets | December 04, 2008 at 02:36 PM
"As I Mariners fan, I want FMart straight up for Putz."
And as a 20 year old male, I want a BJ from Megan Fox. Somethings just won't happen. You'd best be moving on from your little dream. And by the way, to all the Mets fan crying like bitches (again), I wasn't aware of the new rule that the bullpen has to be set and good to go by December 4th. I always thought the season started in April. What a moron I am. I bet you are the same guys who cried for 2 months about why won't Omar offer Reyes for Santana? The idiot! Why won't he offer Fernando Martinez for Santana? What an idiot! Oh wait! We got Santana without moving any of the above!
Jesus Christ Bob Howry signed and you all act like we just missed out on the buy of the century. It is barely December and nobody worth a damn has signed a contract besides Affeldt. Rushing into things an signing guys so you can have them in December and overpaying is what idiots do. A guy signed in January counts the same as a guy signed in November. But no, you all want to overpay guys so we can argue with Philly fans for 4 months about how we are the team to beat because we fixed our bullpen in December. Unbelievable. What impatient little spoiled brats we are.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 04, 2008 at 02:57 PM
"I would agree to this on a condition. If this is true and it comes down to $40 million from either the Mets or the Angels, I would think that K-Rod is headed back to Los Angeles. If K-Rod is going to come to New York, I really think it will be about money and nothing more."
If K-Rod goes back to LA for 40 million, that is still amazing for the Mets. We can then sign Fuentes or Wood for cheaper, and I prefer those guys to K-Rod anyway. But most of you would have Omar sign K-Rod a month ago to 7/100 just to say we have K-Rod.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 04, 2008 at 03:00 PM
I hope these talks for the Mets trading for a closer are rumors, if they give up F-Mart, Niece, Kunz and others for Putz for 2 years at 15 million combined.. I will crap myself. Giving up a couple of draft picks is not ideal for signing K-Rod, but better than guys who you have an idea what they will give you. If they package F-Mart, it better be a huge package, Ichiro better be coming over too. lol.
Posted by: MrMet | December 04, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Check this nucca's.. Trade for Mr. Street and sign K-Rod. Put them with Smith, Feliciano, Stokes, and sign Juan Cruz and Cordero. That bullpen should hold up. I really want Man Ram in NYC with the Mets. Yo souf4life where you at dogg ill be waiting to some wack a** bullshi* come out your mouth.
Posted by: wu-tang haze | December 04, 2008 at 03:52 PM
F-Mart for Putz is not happening. I don't think Seattle lets the Mets have Putz without at least one of Murphy or Niese, though. I'm not optimistic it'll happen..
There should be better suitors for Putz out there. I like what the Tigers could offer. Not sure what the Indians would be giving up. Brewers have some interesting pieces.
Posted by: blueandteal | December 04, 2008 at 06:42 PM
''Jesus Christ Bob Howry signed and you all act like we just missed out on the buy of the century. It is barely December and nobody worth a damn has signed a contract besides Affeldt. Rushing into things an signing guys so you can have them in December and overpaying is what idiots do. A guy signed in January counts the same as a guy signed in November. But no, you all want to overpay guys so we can argue with Philly fans for 4 months about how we are the team to beat because we fixed our bullpen in December. Unbelievable. What impatient little spoiled brats we are.''
I could care less about Philadelphia. Mets fans should know better than to try to brag about their team, especially after the last two years. But the bottom line is, I have sat through at least 40 Mets games at Shea in the past two years where this bullpen has continued to implode again and again. Omar could've read the signs in September 2007 that his bullpen was falling apart after the first collapse but he decided to leave the bullpen as is, which wasn't exactly the worst move because it could've been a typical one-month meltdown. Well it certainly wasn't, and now it's time to overhaul this bullpen, and I don't mean by acquiring an overpriced closer and that's it.
I agree with you about overpaying for players in the early going of free agency, but the Giants didn't exactly overpay for either Affeldt or Howry. Affeldt for 2/8 was a borderline steal.
I'm just worried that Omar is going to sign K-Rod for ridiculous money, maybe trade one of those mainstays in the '07-'08 bullpens, and just leave the bullpen as is, and that will be his RECONSTRUCTION of the bullpen. If there is one thing I hate about Omar Minaya, it is his inability to acquire pitching depth, whether it be starting or relief. I really hope he has learned his lesson this time around.
Say what you want about the Heilman and Feliciano for Street rumor, and I know you are a big Heilman fan, but that would've started an overhaul of this bullpen. If they signed K-Rod after acquiring Street, they would have a pretty impressive 1-2 combo that would definitely leave Mets fans more confident in '09 in the late innings instead of seeing the usual suspects trotting out there, blowing games.
Posted by: MattyMets | December 04, 2008 at 07:02 PM
To those who say that the Mets should sign a free agent as apposed to trading for Putz... Sure they would have to give up minor league talent for the trade, but in case you were unaware of the way free agency works... signing K-rod or Fuentes would also make us lose prospects. You lose two picks in the draft for signing an A-type free agent. So IMO trading for Putz would be no different then signing K-rod, except of course trading for Putz would be cheaper...ALOT! Not to mention the fact that Putz's fastball avg. 95mph when K-rod's is more like 91-92...
Posted by: give me vlad and fuentes | December 05, 2008 at 12:42 AM
oh, and im sorry i made a mistake, the team who signs the free agent only loses one 1st round draft choice... but still you are going to lose a FIRST ROUND DRAFT CHOICE REGARDLESS...
Posted by: give me vlad and fuentes | December 05, 2008 at 12:47 AM