![]() |
|
|
| |
« D-Backs Looking For A Fourth Starter? | Main | Pirates Looking at Ray King »
6:07pm: Kat O'Brien just got off the phone with Brewers GM Doug Melvin:
He said: "Nothing new. At this point, I don't anticipate it's something that we would (do). ... I haven't talked to Brian (Cashman) since last week." Melvin said they had originally looked at moving Cameron to gain some flexibility on the pitching front but that is no longer such a need.
Melvin added that trading Cameron was "not something that we're pushing at this time." Sounds like it's dead. (For now, anyway.)
TUESDAY 3:09pm: Ed Price says the Yankees are discussing this deal internally and don't feel like they have to rush. Price's source says a tentative deal has been reached and it's up to the Yankees now. Tom Haudricourt says the Brewers haven't heard from the Yanks this week and assistant GM Gord Ash is starting to wonder whether they're still interested. Yahoo's Tim Brown says the Brewers will get in on Brian Fuentes if they're able to move Cameron.
12:10pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman says the Mike Cameron for Melky Cabrera deal is on the backburner for now. Still, he says the Brewers agreed to take Kei Igawa and pay a small amount of the $12MM he's owed. That amount is not enough for the Yankees, currently.
Sarah Green also contributed to this post.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053678a813970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mike Cameron-to-Yankees Dead?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Poor simple minded brewers cannot possibly thwart the Evil Empire.
They're just in it for the beer anyway..
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 16, 2008 at 12:13 PM
God if this trade goes through I hope Igawa is still part of it in the end
Posted by: mike923 | December 16, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Oh just make the trade already for God Sakes, whats a few million to the Yankees.
If you're going to do it, just do it otherwise just move on. I for one and tired of reading weekly negotiations for a non major trade..
Posted by: TripleHHH | December 16, 2008 at 12:16 PM
this is dumb.... the yankees are already winning this trade.. the brewers should back out now.
Posted by: mr utley | December 16, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Do not undo all the good done in pitching acquisitions by risking Damon in centerfield. The memories of all the opposing runners rounding second on grounders up the middle as johnnie trots in and makes a feeble throw to the infield is haunting. Also, if you want an over-the-hill centerfielder go for Edmonds or someone else over Cameron. We must be looking at Cameron scouting reports of five years ago. He now is no better than Melky and at least Melky has potential upside.
Posted by: Dan | December 16, 2008 at 12:24 PM
I agree with TripleHHH, make the deal or don't. I say give Melky another shot. He is a good defender with a good arm. As for Igawa trade him back to Japan.
Posted by: Jim | December 16, 2008 at 12:24 PM
I read that the reason the yankees are hesitating is because of baseball reasons. Could it possibly be because the yankees are really considering acquiring manny ramirez? Maybe they are waiting because the $10 million to cameron could be used towards ramirez? Don't know if the rumors of yankees seriously pursuing manny is true, but it definitely makes me wonder.
Posted by: Willard69 | December 16, 2008 at 12:38 PM
"this is dumb.... the yankees are already winning this trade.. the brewers should back out now."
Totally agree.
The Brewers clearly thought retaining Cameron would help them land CC, because they really don't seem to be keen on keeping him now.
They're going to deal one year of a good CF on a reasonable contract for mediocre Melky Cabrera and Kei Igawa while not even saving all of Cam's money.
This is after Kevin freaking Gregg landed the Marlins Jose Ceda, regarded as a very good pitching prospect.
I realize that not many teams have holes in center (Yankees, White Sox, Reds maybe the Rockies and Braves), but the market is basically bare in terms of legitimate CF options, with the big names being guys like Edmonds, Kotsay, Payton, Patterson and Taveras.
Cameron is far better than any of those options, is fairly priced, and would only cost as much as Melky Cabrera costs.
I don't see why a team like the Braves or Reds isn't willing to throw a prospect to Milwaukee for one year of him.
The Reds could add Cameron to play center and put Dickerson in left, as a possible alternative. Then the lineup would be based around Cam, Bruce, Votto, EE, etc.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Since when are the Skankees concerned about a few bucks?
Posted by: Blue Rauchmann | December 16, 2008 at 12:42 PM
I agree
Cameron is a lot better than all of the Free agent CF. The Brewers and Melvin are dumb to take Melky and Igawa and still have to pay some $$. This is insane!
I am curious is to how much they are going to pay. If it is $3M, why not just keep Cameron for the $10M and trade him next season when the options are better? Getting Melky and Igawa is a rip off.
Other teams are probably interested some in a CF. I hate the f.ing Yankees and Cashman. All the money in the world and can't pay to get Cameron. Cameron is a lot better than Melky and Igawa will be in AAA.
I am furious with the Brewers right now and not doing anything to improve the team. What have we done so far?
RE-Sign Todd Coffey
Sign Joge Julio
Lose out on CC
Lose out on Sheets
Lose out on Cameron
Are major signing right now is Julio? All these other teams are improving and we are declining big time. By the time Melvin gets his head out of his ***, all the players will be gone. Good job Melvin, you SOB!
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 12:52 PM
"I am curious is to how much they are going to pay. If it is $3M, why not just keep Cameron for the $10M and trade him next season when the options are better?"
Probably because teams can't trade free agents.
Posted by: vtadave | December 16, 2008 at 01:04 PM
For now ... but what if the rules changed? Then how dumb would Melvin look???
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 16, 2008 at 01:16 PM
If Melvin trades Cameron for the Yankees garbage and doesn't even save money doing so he's a much bigger idiot that I thought he was.
Posted by: MrQuestions | December 16, 2008 at 01:31 PM
I think the Yanks have agreed to pay all of Cameron's salary. It's how much of Igawa's contract that was the issue. The Yanks want to pay some of it but not all three remaining years, thus giving them Igawa for free whicm doesn't make sense to me. It's not like they are doing the Yanks a favor by taking Igawa and NOT paying any of his salary.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 02:11 PM
But the Brewers are sortaaa doing New York a favor by dealing Cameron at 1/10 for Melky Cabrera..
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Why would the Brewers want Igawa and that contract? Make a move Melvin!! Get some talent!
Posted by: whitesox4life | December 16, 2008 at 02:32 PM
And the yanks are doing them a favor by assuming his entire contract. all 10 mil regardless of whether you think thats fair market value.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Brewers fans need to realize that the team is not going to compete in 2009.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 16, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Aggreed, WHY would you want Igawa? He proved he is not a Major League pitcher. And the Brewers should not have to pick up a cent of either contract, the Yankees are trying to unload Igawa and improve their CF position. It's purely a win if they get Cameron for Igawa plus cash.
Posted by: Gosser128 | December 16, 2008 at 03:29 PM
Kei Igawa is exactly who the Brewers need to neutralize that Cubs lineup of Lee, Soriano, Soto, Ramirez, Derosa, Theriot. Igawa is a right handed hitters dream pitcher.
Posted by: Teetz1 | December 16, 2008 at 03:37 PM
We know that the brewers wont be very good in 09, but yankee fans need to realize that they are ruining the game of baseball.
Posted by: glover28 | December 16, 2008 at 03:40 PM
hey how about throwing in Hall and asking for Kennedy to be added to pkg. and take on some of Igawa salary, then C.C can have all his buddies around him.
Posted by: rolafaive | December 16, 2008 at 03:49 PM
The Brewers should just look to rebuild. Now that Sheets and CC are gone, plus the aquisitions done by the Mets, there is just no hope for even the wild card. (Cubs/St. Louis will land central and Mets/Phillies will land the wild card)
I'm not sure keeping Cameron will work because if he has a bad year then I'd doubt any team would sign him at that age. Thereby losing on any draft picks without an arbitration. They should just take Melky too save money.
If they're really tring to free up money for Fuentes then that's another reason to get rid of him.
Posted by: strikethree | December 16, 2008 at 03:53 PM
wow its funny listening to all the Yankee haters. So let me get this straight the Yankees are ruining the game of baseball by spending money on CC and Burnett but also ruining the game of baseball by trying to save money on Cameron....do you people really ever listen to what comes out of your mouths?
The Brewers are kicking themselves right now because they needed to free up the money Cameron makes to sign some free agents. Now the Yankees are in the drivers seat and have the entire offseason to make the move for Cam while the Brewers will watch every good free agent they were targeting go to another team over the next month.
Melky may never be a superstar but can be a very serviceable MLB player. Everyone forgets he hit .280 in 2007 with a .360 OBP while playing stellar defense and is still only 24!!! If the Brewers made the trade and Melky was their starting center fielder their problem would not be on the offensive side of the game. They lack pitching which is why they need money to go after it....either that or they have to trade Prince coming off a not so great season for a starter and then they would have a huge hole to fill in for the middle of their lineup.
The problems with these mid to low market teams is they think they can hold the Yankees ransom for their overpaid veterans. They think this because of the stupid trades and signings the Yankees made after the dynasty to try and get another WS. The Yankees learned from their mistakes and will not start trading away the farm for anyone anymore. The Brewers overplayed their hand this year much like the Twins did last year with Johan. Note to all GM's....these are not the same free spending/trading Yankees of old!!!!!!!
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 04:12 PM
two questions for doug melvin...
1) do you know who kei igawa is?
2) who do you intend will get the ball to brian fuentes?
it seems stupid to me to give fuentes 30MM+- on a team that, imo, seems to have a complete lack of pitching and probably wont contend.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 04:33 PM
"Cameron is far better than any of those options, is fairly priced, and would only cost as much as Melky Cabrera costs."
Huh? Melky Cabrera is going to cost maybe $1M in arbitration. Probably less, coming off the year he had. How is that the same as Cameron?
______________________________
"how about throwing in Hall and asking for Kennedy to be added to pkg. and take on some of Igawa salary"
Hall has just about as much negative value as Igawa. If the Yankees took all of Hall's contract and the Brewers took all of Igawa's, then Milwaukee would save $3.5M, plus spread out their now smaller sunk cost over three years instead of two. I'm not sure I could argue that Hall for Igawa straight up would be unfair to either side, so I don't see how Hall for Igawa + cash would make the Yankees want to throw in Kennedy.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 16, 2008 at 04:35 PM
LOL, Not the same free spending Yankees of old?
Yanks09, You have to be kidding? Spending 161M on CC and then spending a ton on overpaid injury prone Burnett? Now thinking of signing Manny Ramirez. Seems like they are up to their old ways of paying whatever it takes to get the bet players out there.
I said it before and I will say it again, the Yankees have a team of superstars yet they under perform every year. All they care about is the money and themselves.
If the Marlins can compete with a miserable payroll maybe the Yankees can learn from them. By taking every free agent on the market that is available and yet still can't make the playoffs, I would have to agree that they are ruining the game.
The fans show their dislikes when the team doesn't win and then they go out and buy everyone. When are they going to realize baseball is a team sport and not an ego building sport?
With the players the Yankees have, why didn't they make the playoffs? It will be the same in 2009 as well. Then they will let some players go and spend $1,000,000,000 on free agents next year.
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 04:38 PM
"And the yanks are doing them a favor by assuming his entire contract. all 10 mil regardless of whether you think thats fair market value."
How is getting a guy for market value for one year doing Milwaukee any favors? Any team that has a hole in CF would gladly take Cameron at 1/10. It makes me really annoyed (and somewhat amused) that so many of these Yankee fans are so vehemently against a gigantic upgrade in CF, on a short commitment, at market value, when they need a stopgap CF for AJax, when all they need to trade is the worthless Melky Cabrera. It is truly mind boggling, it really is.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 16, 2008 at 04:39 PM
Brewers don't need a closer. McClung should close.
Please don't spend $$$$ on a closer. Get some quality starting pitching please Doug!
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 04:41 PM
"wow its funny listening to all the Yankee haters. So let me get this straight the Yankees are ruining the game of baseball by spending money on CC and Burnett but also ruining the game of baseball by trying to save money on Cameron....do you people really ever listen to what comes out of your mouths?"
I love a guy that starts his post off with the above comments, then goes on to say Melky is a serviceable player, Cameron is an overpaid veteran, Santana is an overpaid veteran, and these are not the same free spending Yankees of old. People need to realize Cameron's salaray doesn't need to come off the books now because the Crew is not going to compete in 09, but they will in 2010, and Cam's money will be off the books by then anyway, where they can get some draft pick compensation out of this, which is much better then Melky Cabrera. The idea that Cameron must be moved so free agents can be brought in is laughable. I feel really bad for you. Although, thinking about it, I really don't. Ignorance really is bliss. It must be nice living in a little fantasy world.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 16, 2008 at 04:43 PM
"And the yanks are doing them a favor by assuming his entire contract. all 10 mil regardless of whether you think thats fair market value."
How is getting a guy for market value for one year doing Milwaukee any favors? Any team that has a hole in CF would gladly take Cameron at 1/10. It makes me really annoyed (and somewhat amused) that so many of these Yankee fans are so vehemently against a gigantic upgrade in CF, on a short commitment, at market value, when they need a stopgap CF for AJax, when all they need to trade is the worthless Melky Cabrera. It is truly mind boggling, it really is.
__________________________
OK Seriously WTF don't you understand?
The issue is NOT Cameron for Melky and Igawa. The issue is Cam for Melky, Igawa and the Yanks paying all of Cam AND Igawa's 12 mil remaining.
The Yanks will pay all of Cam's contract but asking for Igawa and wanting us to pay all of his money due is the problem.
Seriously, learn wtf people are saying. I'm so beyond the Cam vs Melky arguement and tired of you people repeating the same things over and over w/o understanding that we're past that.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 05:01 PM
craig....actually if you look at it and clear your yankee hating mind you will see this is not the Yankees of old.
The Yankees would have panicked in 2007 and traded the farm for Johan. They wouldn't have waited a year when they desperately needed an ace to wait for the best pitcher in baseball who is only 28 to become a free agent and go after him.
Although I do no agree with the Burnett signing because of injury risk they had to do it. If he is healthy he dominates the AL east and it is going to be a dog fight for that division.
And although I don't like Manny (and still dont think he is coming to NY)....the Yankees of old would have passed on him and signed/traded for an aging outfielder who is already showing signs of decline. After what Manny did last year nobody can say he is showing any signs of slowing down. He also has 2 world series rings (at the yankees expense) to prove what he can do for a team.
Let me ask you something craig....and I want you to answer honestly....if Josh Beckett were a free agent this offseason and the Yankees signed him to the same deal that they got Burnett to accept....would you consider that a bad move?
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 05:03 PM
"Huh? Melky Cabrera is going to cost maybe $1M in arbitration. Probably less, coming off the year he had. How is that the same as Cameron?"
You're not really reading it in context. I meant that in a trade the team acquiring Cameron would only have to eat his contract and give up value similar to Melky Cabrera. And that's a good deal.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 05:04 PM
How are the yankees not ruining the game???? they just rolled out 240 million for two players!!!! teams are spending way too much, and soon, mid market teams wont even be able to compete for free agents. They yankees are a disgrace, because they have a lot of arrogant fans (not saying all), and they have by far the highest payroll in the league, and they still cant win.
Posted by: glover28 | December 16, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Weird. The yankees drop 240 million and then have multiple deals that they are holding out for at most a couple extra million on?
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 16, 2008 at 05:15 PM
nrmax:
Why would you say it makes sense for the Brews to compete in 2010 and not 09?
And if you seriously think that the Brewers are NOT going to compete in 09 then why would they want to keep Cameron and pay him 10 mil as their 2nd highest player? This is the team that sheds payroll when their not competing. And in case you haven't noticed this year several major players have gone w/o being offered arbitration.
Garrett Anderson
Pat Burrel
Adam Dunn
Why would the Brewers be so stupid to offer Cameron arbitration in winter 09 (the only way they would get the draft pics you alluded to)when the possibility exists that he might accept and get a pay increase for 2010?
Seriously, I usually don't agree w/ you but usually respect your opinion. Are you so jaded that you don't see the flaws in your thinking? I mean are you Cameron's agent or something? Is he a relative?
And why is the other posters statement that they need to use Cam's money inorder to afford a FA pitcher so absurd? Melvin alreadys aid the owner will not let him use CC's money for another FA and they do need to replace both CC and Sheets and need a closer. They have 10 mil coming off for Gagne's contract and I'm sure if they could use Cam's 10 towards getting a pitcher like Randy Johnson or Brian Fuentes would make much more sense.
The Brewers are absolutely desperate to get rid of Cameron and so far the Yanks are the only ones willing and capable of eating his entire 10 mil owed. If they want Igawa included in the deal then they can pay some of his salary.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 05:18 PM
glover you contradict yourself!!!
you piss and moan about small market teams not being able to compete b/c the large market teams are spending so much money but then point out that even they dont win while spending all the money!!
the key is not how much you spend but on who you spend.
maybe your team of choice should make better personnel decisions so you could worry more about that and less about what cashman is doing with his checkbook.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 05:19 PM
i sort of did, but you get my point. they yankees raise the standard for every free agent out there, and then smaller market teams cant compete. thats what i mean
Posted by: glover28 | December 16, 2008 at 05:24 PM
How are the yankees not ruining the game???? they just rolled out 240 million for two players!!!! teams are spending way too much, and soon, mid market teams wont even be able to compete for free agents. They yankees are a disgrace, because they have a lot of arrogant fans (not saying all), and they have by far the highest payroll in the league, and they still cant win.
____________________________
So the Yanks are ruining the game?? This is the stupid attitudes I'm talking about!!!!
Fact: CC's $161 is for 7 years = avg 23 mil per
Fact: Johan Santana's deal is for 6/135 PLUS a VESTING year which makes it 7/157 mil
2014 club option becomes player option if Santana:
wins Cy Young award from 2008-13 and finishes second or third in the Cy Young vote in one other season
ranks second or third in Cy Young vote in any 3 seasons, 2008-13
is on the active roster for the final 30 days of 2013 season.
He finished 3rd in CY Young voting this year which now adds the 7th year to the deal @ 25 mil in 2014.
7/157 avg out to 22.4 mil
Fact: The Braves offerd AJ 5/80.
How are the Yanks ruining baseball when they gave CC the same deal the Mets gave Johan Santana (and didn't have to trade 4 prospects) and gave AJ 3 ofr 4 million more than what the Braves did?
And so far, we aren't the ones throwing 180 million @ Teixeira.
People get real. The hypocracy is so sickening.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 05:30 PM
glover28 you are just hating on the Yankees. Yes they shelled out money for the best pitcher in the game (only 28 and can opt out in 3 years) and a very good big game pitcher in Burnett....so what. Want your mind blown??? If the Yanks steer clear of Manny and the Sox sign Tex who will have the highest payroll in baseball???? Yeah it won't be the Yankees anymore. Who will you complain about then??
Also it is not the Yankees fault MLB decided to put teams in Colorado, Tampa, Miami and Arizona. Its not the Yankees fault that these other teams (Pitssburgh, Toronto, Seattle, Kansas City) also cannot draw the people in their surrounding area to the ballparks. The MLB wants these teams so their is more revenue....its all about the money. Get rid of these teams and there would be such an overload of talent payroll wouldn't mean jack.
Nobody wants baseball in these areas and you can tell that by the attendance. It is not the Yankees fault nobody goes to the games (parks sell out everywhere when they play the Yankees). The problem is MLB puts/keeps teams in these areas to increase overall revenue. MLB is about money not fairness of the game, the Yankees have the most at this point in time and are willing to spend so yes they win. Save your water works for an argument you can actually back up.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Why not try and trade Cameron Villanueva and prospects to the White Sox for Jenks and Dye? Then move Weeks to CF and Escobar plays second?
$11-$13 for Dye
$1-$2 for Jenks
Total $15M ADDS ON
$10 Cameron
$1 Villanueva
Total $11M
We would be taking on only $4 million to get 2 quality players.
Just a thought
Sign a couple FA Pitchers and call it good.
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Trade Hart, Villanueva, and Cameron
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 05:40 PM
the twins, oakland, florida to a degree, cleveland have all proven small market teams can compete with teams spending loads of cash.
the key is spending efficiently, drafting and developing, and staying out of bad contracts.
certainly 95% of teams cant afford to sign a CC type of contract but is that a bad thing? i dont think so.
i also think a guy like burnett is doing teams favors by taking NY's money b/c i dont think he's worth it.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 05:41 PM
EWS1532 I am not saying they cannot compete I am saying the people of the surrounding area do not care if do or do not (except Cleveland). I was skeptical of the Burnett signing at first but I love it now. He is a big game pitcher and I am finally realizing that the Yankees signed him to be a hitman in the playoffs. Look Josh Becketts career numbers compared to Burnetts. They are eerily similar...basically the only difference between these pitchers is that Beckett has had the fortune of being able to pitch in the playoffs.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 06:17 PM
We need Manny, not Mike Cameron.
I do not understand any of the hype over this transaction. We don't need a guy with speed and defensive skills. We have Brett Gardner.
We need a serious bat in the lineup to protect the best hitter in baseball. If we don't get someone in there, you better believe Alex's numbers will be way down.
Forget Cameron. Waste of time. Especially if it is going to cost us anything over a penny.
Posted by: KronTToP | December 16, 2008 at 06:35 PM
"I do not understand any of the hype over this transaction. We don't need a guy with speed and defensive skills. We have Brett Gardner."
But Brett Gardner can't hit. Speed isn't helpful if you can't hit, and a contender can't afford to have a black hole in the lineup everyday.
I agree that the Yankees need to add someone to the middle of their batting order, but that shouldn't affect their pursuit of Mike Cameron.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 06:45 PM
yanks09 - you and i are on the same page.
regarding becks and burnett... burnett has a slightly muddy health track record. i agree that they comperable.
my beef is with the assertion that small market cant compete with large market.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 06:45 PM
"I meant that in a trade the team acquiring Cameron would only have to eat his contract and give up value similar to Melky Cabrera."
OK, thanks for clearing that up.
________________________________
"We don't need a guy with speed and defensive skills. We have Brett Gardner."
How about a guy with speed and defensive skills who doesn't hit like a pitcher? OK, that's a bit harsh. But do you want to have a competitive team in 2009, or do you want to act like you're rebuilding? Because giving a guy like Gardner 400+ ABs is something that rebuilding teams do. It's not something that teams trying to win do.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 16, 2008 at 06:48 PM
mac 1103 The Yanks have the luxury of being able to rebuild while still competing. Its okay if Gardner only hits .250 because they have all star caliber hitters in every other spot in their lineup. Gardner will actually help the Yanks in playing small ball as he will be asked to bunt, move runners over, and run. All while playing stellar defense. If it gets to the point where his bat is hurting the team the Yankees have what it takes to go out and find a capable center fielder through in a trade.
Again the great Yankee teams of the late 90's did not have guys who would hit 30 HR's and 100 RBI's at every position. They had a menacing pitching staff (which has been created in the CC and AJ signings) and an offense that had the ability to put up what they needed to win....not by blowing out teams 10-3 every game.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 07:21 PM
I agree that Cameron won't affect us from getting Man-NY at all.
I laugh, however, that a player like Gardner will keep us from being competitive in 09.
I also take issue with how you people evaluate a players potential based on 127 at bats. Other than bringing up how poor he hit in 127 sporadic at bats I still have yet to here an intelligent offering as to why he wouldn't be able to hit .280/.350 and provide 40+ stolen bases next year. Maybe you guys have a crystal ball or something.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 07:33 PM
I think that even if the Yanks trade for Cameron that Gardner will still get 300-400 at bats next year. Gardner is going to play a bigger role in the Yanks future plans than Cameron will. Ajax is no guarantee to be ready in 2010 and I think Girardi would like to see if Gardner can replace Damon as their future leadoff man.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 07:38 PM
But Brett Gardner can't hit. Speed isn't helpful if you can't hit, and a contender can't afford to have a black hole in the lineup everyday.
___________________________
08 Phillies: Ruiz .219/.302
07 Boston: Lugo .237/.294
06 Cardinals: Molina .216/.274 and Miles .263/.324
05 Whitesox: Posednik .290/.351 (similar player to Gardner)
04 Boston: Mienkewitz .238/.326
Not to say we should willingly put a light stick out there but I don't think his POSSIBLE ofesive struggles would cripple the lineup in any shape or form.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 07:54 PM
good point yanksfansince78.....also I would like to note that the last 5 WS champions won on pitching pitching pitching and what did the Yankees make sure they got this offseason?
Posted by: yanks09 | December 16, 2008 at 08:20 PM
The Brewers should trade Cameron for anyone willing to take on that contract, then re-sign Sheets and maybe pick up a closer. They'd still compete with their offense and a rotation of Sheets, Gallardo, Bush, Parra, Suppan isn't that bad.
Posted by: bigpat | December 16, 2008 at 08:50 PM
If the lineup 1-8 can't carry a guy like Gardner at #9 and if the rotation of 1-4 cant carry a #5 such as Hughes, we might as well not even have a minor league system. This is the best scenario in which to give those guys a shot.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 16, 2008 at 09:38 PM
But the Yankees can't afford to waste 400+ at bats on a player who doesn't have any ML future when the team didn't make the playoffs the year before. Plain and simple.
Gardner won't have the hit tools to ever be more than a .280/.340/.380 type of hitter with a bunch of steals and good defense. That's fine, but he's the type of player that the Yankees don't hold onto once they begin to get costly.
It's true, that giving Gardner some at bats isn't going to sabotage New York. But it will definitely hurt there chances.
If Gardner had the potential to be an above average regular, then I would be fine giving him some at bats in 2009. But you're giving him those at bats in the hope that he develops into a league average player. That's just not something that the New York Yankees need to be doing, not with their expectations and their payroll. Not when their ballpark costed over $1B, costed the taxpayers millions, and their seats still cost a forture
Let Gardner go.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 09:40 PM
Scribbletone..
I pay $20 a seat per game, hardly a fortune. They arent the best seats in the house, but they arent the bleachers either.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 16, 2008 at 09:46 PM
Aren't the prices supposed to go up a lot going into the new Yankee Stadium though..?
Putting Brett Gardner in center just isn't a logical baseball idea for that organization. You guys seem to think he has the upside of Ellsbury. This isn't a guy who will ever be able to bat .325 or even hit 10 home runs in the majors. He can take a walk or two, but basically you're talking about best case scenario, Juan Pierre with better plate discipline and a better arm, but less contact. Are you willing to spend 400+ at bats during a huge 2009 season developing that player? Even when you have a different young player in AA who projects to be far more than that, and should be ready by 2009?
Posted by: scribbletone | December 16, 2008 at 09:54 PM
Back to the trade...
I have figured it out, Milwaukee should just say forget it! They will have $10M for a season of Cameron who was 5th in CF in home runs and missed 25 games due to a suspension. Bottom line is he is worth more than Melky and Igawa, period!
Say Melky makes $2M next year and we have to pay $4 for Igawa, that is $6M. Why not pay $4M more for a proven CF in Cameron and either trade him to a contender mid season (which more than likely might be NY anyways) or wait until free agency and get a draft pick?
If we keep Cameron and trade him to the Yankees mid season, they will be willing to trade us more than Melky and Igawa.
I can't believe the Yankees think that Cameron is over valued at $10M. That is insane. Yes, he has his share of strikeouts, but a veteran gold glove winner is worth it especially to an organization like the Yankees.
So, keep Cameron and let him go via free agency next year and get a good draft pick or trade him to a contender mid season.
Don't settle for Igawa and Cabrera. Igawa is a nobody and will be in AAA anyways.
Posted by: craig | December 16, 2008 at 10:13 PM
What are the odds of any of these Yankee-haters realizing that even with the signings of Sabathia, Burnett and Marte, as well as the acquisition of Swisher, the Yankees payroll is considerably LOWER right now than it was in 2008?
In case you forgot, Giambi, Pavano, Mussina, Farnsworth/Pudge, Pettitte, Abreu, Betemit all came off the books.
Posted by: sciorsci | December 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM
"Its okay if Gardner only hits .250 because they have all star caliber hitters in every other spot in their lineup."
Umm, no they don't. Even if Cano bounces back and Posada can throw well enough to catch 130 games, they don't have an all-star caliber hitter at 1B or in RF. So it's not eight carrying one, it's more like five carrying two or three. So it matters if the CF can't hit a lick, even if he does play great defense.
"the great Yankee teams of the late 90's did not have guys who would hit 30 HR's and 100 RBI's at every position"
But they did have guys who got on base at a very good rate at every position. Not making outs is kind of an important part of scoring runs.
"Other than bringing up how poor he hit in 127 sporadic at bats I still have yet to here an intelligent offering as to why he wouldn't be able to hit .280/.350 and provide 40+ stolen bases next year."
Lots of intelligent arguments have been made, and repeatedly at that. You just don't want to listen to them, which is fine and all, but don't say that nobody has explained why they don't think Gardner will be able to hit well enough to be a major league regular. Again, it's because his skill set does not translate from the minors to the majors in the current high-offense environment. He can draw a lot of walks in the minors because many pitchers don't have the stuff to overpower him and/or the command and control to paint the corners. But a lot of major league pitchers can literally knock the bat out of his hands, and/or make nearly unhittable pitches that will be called strikes.
Now having said that, I will again reiterate that I think he can be a perfectly useful part-time player if spotted against the right kinds of pitchers and used to pinch run and play late inning defense. Trading for Cameron doesn't prevent Gardner from being used that way, and doesn't stop him from possibly developing into a little bit more than that in another year or two. What will stop his development is throwing him into the CF job full time and letting him get his head handed to him.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 16, 2008 at 11:02 PM
"I can't believe the Yankees think that Cameron is over valued at $10M."
I can't believe it either. Then again, I don't believe it. I think they're just mulling things over. It's not like he's the only way they can improve their team.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 16, 2008 at 11:04 PM
"parks sell out everywhere when they play the Yankees"
Overstatement obviously. Yankees drew around 78.4 full on the road. They were 5th in total drawn on road average but that was behind the padres even, so its not like they are a magic ticket sale waiting to happen.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 16, 2008 at 11:07 PM
"If the lineup 1-8 can't carry a guy like Gardner at #9 and if the rotation of 1-4 cant carry a #5 such as Hughes, we might as well not even have a minor league system. This is the best scenario in which to give those guys a shot."
Yankeegirl: you are right ideally the Yankees should be able to carry a weak bat in CF and in the 5th spot in the rotation. But wasn't this their philosphy last year? Wasn't the idea that Wang, Pettite, Mussina would hold down the top spots and between Hughes Kennedy and Joba they could manage the last two. Also last year i dont think anyone thought Melky was going to be Bernie Williams at the plate but their high powered offense could sustain one weak bat. Well as you saw last year injuries and ineffectiveness can ruin the best laid plans.
Now I do believe that for the most part their rotation is better, if Hughes struggled or an injury to Burnett or Joba occured they have a pitcher or two who could step in for a while. Also I believe CC's ablity to eat innings will help this team in a big way.
As for their lineup I think the Yankees aren't in as good of a position as most people think. I think losing Giambi and Abreu are bigger losses than most people realize. Were they overpaid, absolutly; were they bad defenders, with out a doubt; but they were pretty valuable to the Yankees success. And either one of their value would have been higher as a full time DH not having their fielding miscues mitigate their offensive contirbutions.
I think outside of ARod, Damon and Jeter should all likely have very good offensive years, though it is worth noting that Jeter did have his worst offensive year to date. Outside of that there are some serious question marks.
Posada is coming back from a shoulder injury which not only affects his behind the plate performance but can affect his swing as well. With the exception of his contract year his last 4 years show a decline and that was before the injury. Matsui is also coming back from another major injury is 2nd in 3 years. I personally would have no confidence in him giving the Yanks a full season. Cano, now i'm not going to say he will never rebound but last year was bad and should be a little cause for concern, bc if he struggles again than that is another weak bat to worry about. Honestly I don't think he'll be that bad but at the same time I dont feel he's as good as he was back in 2006 and 2007. His minor league numbers, 2005, and 2008 don't support the theory that he is a top offensive 2nd baseman. I think he'll be slightly above average.
Now the Yankees also have 2 new hitters in Nady and Swisher. Both i'd expect to be solid additions to the Yankees, but neither is an all-star. Swisher is a little worrisome because he's coming off a HORRIBLE year. But i'd expect him to rebound some, especially if New Yankee stadium favors lefties like old yankee stadium did. Nady is a bit of a mystery he always seems like he is gonna break out (and maybe last year was the start) but then he falters. It always seems like he struggles as the season wears on but that might just be my perception.
This to me does not look like the most feared lineup in baseball. And in my opinion Gardner (and the opinion of Keith Law, Jim Callis and others) is not much more than a 4th outfielder and does represent a pretty big hole in the lineup.
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM
scribbletone: Your arguement is exactly what gets the Yanks in trouble. By your approach the Yanks should only bring up a player who has superstar potential. We don't need to have a superstar at EVERY singles position, regardless of what our stadium costs, what our payroll is, etc. If there were a Grady Sizemore type of player available, beleive me the Yanks would be in on him. Right now there isn't a clear and obvious replacement for Damon in the leadoff spot. If Gardner can produce a line like .280/.350 and steal 40-50 bases and provide good coverage in CF then the Yanks would be happy. Not every player needs to hit 30 hrs. We can add Cameron to the line-up since that seems to be what everybody wants. I'm willing to accept that maybe my opinion isn't right. But at the same token the Yanks have to make plans looking 2 or 3 years in advance.
I admire what the Yanks are doing beacuse I think , for the first time since the late 90's they're making moves for today as well as for the future. You can't continue to rely on FA each and every year. The purchases of CC and AJ were neccesary because our young pitcher were not ready and we do need to compete now w/o risking the future but I can see how Cashman is thinking. That's why we passed on Johan but went strong this year on FA. I wish the Yanks would leave the #5 spot open or competetion or sign Pettite to hold it for one more year and season Hughes for another year.
Cameron hit .281 vs lefties and .231 against righties. Start off with Cameron playing against righties and Garnder, who is a lefty batter, against right handers.
Gardner can also spell Damon in LF for 10-15 games. If he shows he can handle mlb pitching then guess what, maybe we have a viable replacement for Damon in CF next year, especially if Ajax isn't ready in 2010. If he struggles then Cameron plays full-time and we look at other options for 2010. But if you have a player who produces well in the minors then you let him play, unless there's a much better solution available. You obviously don't value a player like Gardner, but in actually he can be exactly what the Yanks need. A player who can give the Yanks a "small ball" type of player...a potential table setter. If he can deliver a decent avg and obp and steal 40+ bases then I'm happy and judging by scouting reports and minor league stats I don't think that's beyond his ability. If I'm wrong, guess what, play Cameron more often. Zero risk. The line up will be fine and if it's not I guarantee it's not because of a week hitting #9 guy.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 16, 2008 at 11:57 PM
craig: If you have teams refusing to offer arbitration to guys like Abreu, Dunn, Burrel and Garrett Anderson who the hell do you think is going to offer it to Cameron? It's clear what owners are doing. The Brewers would be idiots to offer Cam arbitration because then they would be stuck with him for 2010 for more than 10 mil. If I'm Cameron, I'm accepting that offer the very next day!! Do you honestly think that in winter of 2009 Cameron would get 10 mil in the open market at age 37? Who's going to give up a #1 pick for him? And why would a team offer any kind of decent package for a guy your desperate to get rid of with 2 months left in the season? Please be realistic.
And will you people PLEASE understand that the arguement ISN'T the Yanks paying Cams 10 mil salary, but instead it's the BREWS ASKING FOR IGAWA AND WANTING THE YANKEES TO PAY ALL OF HIS 09, 10 and 11 SALARY!!!!!! WHY ARE YOU NOT GETTING THIS!!!!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 12:07 AM
As it stands now, the Brewers rotation is
1 Yo
2 Bush
3 Suppan
4 Parra
5 ?
So, whose the fifth guy? Seems like Capuano will be ready early, and if he could return to form that would be a nice back end guy. If McClung can be consistent he might also be a decent back end guy.
And if Bush pitches like he did at the end of the season and Parra continues to develop. . . that might not be too bad of a rotation. Granted it would probably be fourth best in the division (after the Cubs, Cards, and Reds) but not too far off from either the Cards or Reds.
I realize Igawa has been a TOTAL bust thusfar, and Melky has seemingly regressed, but if the Crew can save a fairly significant chunk of cash by making this move and then throw that toward a Wolf/Johnson(bad idea, i think, but who knows)/Garland/ Cabrera/Redding/Penny/Looper
or toward an upgrade in the 'pen (oh please oh please help the 'pen)
then i think its a wise move.
and ultimately, Igawa might respond well to a change of scenery. There are plenty of pitchers who just can't reach their potential in a system for whatever the reason - Kyle Lohse and Matt Garza (always butting heads with coaching) in MN for example.
Just thought I'd try to throw some counterarguments (albeit meager ones) against this being the worst deal the Crew could make.
Although, They might be best served to tell the Yanks to eat it, and hold onto Cameron until a playoff contender (assuming the Crew hover around .500 in '09) hit by injuries needs a CF and comes calling
Posted by: my poor buccos | December 17, 2008 at 12:08 AM
walkoffblast: You are wrong again. The Yanks are the 5th best overall road draw in the mlb but 2nd in the Al to Boston only. They're also #1 in combined attendance. You can't really compare them to NL teams considering they only played 7 games on the road during inter-league play.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 12:18 AM
Ok..let's take a poll. Please name me the all-star #9 hitters that you guys are comparing to Melky/Gardner. Name me 1 team with an above average #9 hitter (AL) or #8 hitter in the NL. I'll wait...
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 12:26 AM
Of course the Yanks could use another bat (Tex or Man-NY). Of course we have to hope that Posada and Matsui are healthy. My biggest concern is who do we replace Abreu with at the #3 spot, not who's going to bat 9th. Whether it's Cameron, or Melky, or Cameron and Gardner is not that big of an impact IMO. And if anyone's going to be a rally killer it's having Sisher and Cameron batting 8th and 9th in the lineup (135 and 142)..Oh but wait...scribble doesn't think strikeouts matter...right.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM
"walkoffblast: You are wrong again. The Yanks are the 5th best overall road draw in the mlb but 2nd in the Al to Boston only. They're also #1 in combined attendance. You can't really compare them to NL teams considering they only played 7 games on the road during inter-league play."
You realize the Yankees are #1 in road attendance if you take away their road games at Fenway and if you take away the Red Sox road games at Yankee Staidum
Posted by: mike923 | December 17, 2008 at 12:52 AM
The latest: Deal is dead!
Some comments by Melvin on JS Online.
Doug Melvin and he told me he's preparing now to open the 2009 season with Mike Cameron in center field.
n other words, the Cameron-for-Melky Cabrera talks with the Yankees are off. And it's the Yankees who turned them off by failing to re-establish contact with the Brewers this week.
"I haven't heard from (Yankees general manager) Brian Cashman and I haven't called them," said Melvin."I'm very happy having Mike Cameron with our ball club."
Not thrilled about being left dangling, Melvin said he's not sure he'd push forward with the trade now even if the Yankees re-established contact.
"I'm not sure if I even want to do that," he said.
"I'm not necessarily shopping him," said Melvin. "The Yankees had expressed interest. The only reason to do it was to regain some flexibility to pursue pitching. But the good pitching is drying up anyway."
GOOD!
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 05:24 PM
YanksFan, i agree.
A-Rod is the only player who can hit #3 or #4 in that lineup. Mabey Cano can hit #3, but only if he can hit like he did 2 years ago, but thats all i can think of.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | December 17, 2008 at 06:20 PM
i love it screw cameron and go for manny
Posted by: alex | December 17, 2008 at 06:26 PM
Wow... just reading through some of the comments...
YannksFanSince78 is delusional and wrong about just about everything he said, especially:
"If you have teams refusing to offer arbitration to guys like Abreu, Dunn, Burrel and Garrett Anderson who the hell do you think is going to offer it to Cameron?"
Dunn didn't get offered arbitration because the Diamondbacks didn't want to pay the signing bonus of the player they'd draft, has nothing to do with Dunn.
Burrell didn't get offered arbitration because Ruben Amaro screwed up BIGTIME. He said he didn't want Burrell because he was a defensive liability and then signs Ibanez? That has idiot move written all over it.
YanksFan needs to get a clue and stop spewing his ignorant crap all over these comments.
craig - nice posts.
Posted by: MrQuestions | December 17, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Looks like the Brewers are content on signing a couple of starting pitchers like Randy Johnson.
I really think they should take a chance on Freddy Garcia.
Doug Melvin, It is time to wake up and make some moves. You are really making me mad with saying "we are just going to wait until the prices come down a bit."
Yeah, by then no one will be left.
PS: Don't ever ever sign Daniel Cabrera.
Thanks!
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 06:51 PM
If Tex signs with the Red Sox, then the Brewers should look to trade Prince Fielder to the Angels. Once Tex signs, I believe the Crew should explore options on Prince.
Here is one idea:
Prince Fielder to the Angels
Jered Weaver and Garrett Atkins to the Brewers
Prospects to the Rockies both from the Angels and Brewers
I strongly believe that the Angels will be in pursuit of a first baseman if they don't get Tex. Hint Hint, make Prince available!
Lets see here, Assuming Tex signs with the Red Sox. The AL teams in contention and their respective 1B
Baltimore: Oscar Salazar
New York: Nick Swisher
Tampa Bay: Carlos Pena
Toronto: Lye Overbay
Chicago: Paul Konerko
Cleveland: Ryan Garko
Detroit: Miguel Cabrera
Kansas City: Mike Jacobs
Minnesota: Justin Morneau
Los Angeles: Rob Quinlan
Oakland: Daric Barton
Seattle: Bryan LaHair
Texas: Frank Catalanotto
As you can see, the Angels are in need of a major First baseman. Prince should be dealt to the Angels. Melvin should consider!
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 07:57 PM
Why don't non-Yankee fans understand that even if we signed Tex (which I don't think we will) payroll for '09 will be DOWN from '08?!? Yet, people like craig continue to whine about how much money Cash & co. spend.
Posted by: maximumpotential | December 17, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Wow... just reading through some of the comments...
YannksFanSince78 is delusional and wrong about just about everything he said, especially:
"If you have teams refusing to offer arbitration to guys like Abreu, Dunn, Burrel and Garrett Anderson who the hell do you think is going to offer it to Cameron?"
Dunn didn't get offered arbitration because the Diamondbacks didn't want to pay the signing bonus of the player they'd draft, has nothing to do with Dunn.
Burrell didn't get offered arbitration because Ruben Amaro screwed up BIGTIME. He said he didn't want Burrell because he was a defensive liability and then signs Ibanez? That has idiot move written all over it.
YanksFan needs to get a clue and stop spewing his ignorant crap all over these comments.
craig - nice posts.
__________________________
ROTFLMFYAO
(rolling on the floor laughing my freakin' Yankee ass off) that craig or mr. questions think that a team like the DIamondbacks didn't offer Dunn arbitration because they didn't want to pay their compensation pick a $1 or $2 mil signing bonus..haha. Yeah it was because they didn't want to pony up the 1 or 2 mil VS the 10 or 12 mil Dunn would've received in arbitration...haha. I think that's hilarious!!! Dude if you can't admitt to yourself that the reason why Burrel, Abreu, Dunn and others weren't offered arbitration because their teams didn't want to risk them accepting and being forced to pay them a raise in 09 then we can't have a conversation about this at all. If a major league team can't afford to pay a pick 1 or 2 mil then they need not be in business at all. Cameron WILL NOT be offered arbitration next year. That would be the worst move ever (other than picking up his 09 optio).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 08:04 PM
mike923: "You realize the Yankees are #1 in road attendance if you take away their road games at Fenway and if you take away the Red Sox road games at Yankee Staidum"
If only the Yankees could draw better at Fenway... ;-)
Posted by: Little Bear | December 17, 2008 at 08:08 PM
my bad didn't mean to direct that to craig.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 08:16 PM
I'm glad the trade is off. It would have been one of the dumbest trades the brewers have made in a long time. P.S. YanksFanSince78 shut your mouth, no one wants to hear your crap on every single rumor. Don't you have better things to do than comment 5,000 times on every rumor
Posted by: BrewCrew4life | December 17, 2008 at 08:28 PM
Thanks for clarifying the mistake yanksfan.
By the way, if the Yankees don't make the playoffs in 2009, it will be the BIGGEST sports choke of all time. With that lineup and starting pitching, there is no reason why they should not go deep.
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 08:54 PM
Forget Cameron. He's 36, hits .240 strikes out at an epic rate and makes 10 mill per. I realize it's only for one year...but I say use that 10 mill per towards Tex's 22 mill per and sign the guy. It will give the Yankees protection for ARod, a gold glove defensive 1B and screw the Rag Sox all at the same time.
With a line-up of Damon, Jeter, A Rod, Tex, Matsui, Nady, Cano, Posada and Gardner/Swisher...the Yankees will have enough offense and defense to go with their new pitching staff.
Also, forget signing a fifth starter...let Hughes, Kennedy and Aceves duke it out during Spring Training.
Finally, to all of those saying that "Gardner can't hit"....um, what are you basing this off of?? That massive 127 ab career sample size? He hit in the minors...and since you clueless trolls don't do any research before your ignorant comments...I'll fill you in on some reality. He hit .161 his first trip up....and then his second trip up hit .333 in Aug and .283 in Sept. sounds like he can hit a little now doesn't it! Also has a plus arm and plus plus speed. He'll be just fine for the year and at one-tenth of strikeout King Cameron's price.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | December 17, 2008 at 09:19 PM
JJ..i agree with all you said!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 09:54 PM
No problem craig. If the team doesn't at least make the playoffs it will be a huge embarassment but that's part of sports. The bigger you are the harder you fall.
BrewCrewForLife: Grow a pair. What I said was in response to another poster. I have as much of a right to voice my opinion as you do. Don't like it? Don't read it or respond to it. Matter of fact, every time I make a post feel free to skip over it. What will never be said about me is that I make blind biased "my teams the best your team sucks comments". Have a great day. :)
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 17, 2008 at 09:55 PM
One thing I don't understand on the Brewer's part is why would we go trade for Melky Cabrera, who is going to be a project type of player, when we have Tony Gwynn Jr. who hasn't even had a chance to prove himself. And I know I'm going to probably get all these replies from the Gwynn Jr. bashers who say he can't hit major league pitching, etc. Who cares? I'm sure he won't lead the team in strike outs after playing 1/4 less games as the rest of the team(Mike Cameron). Drop Mike Cameron off to a team for a reliever or something, clear up his waste of a contract, and throw Gwynn in CF for a year, and see how it works out. Anybody else agree?
Posted by: tamtane34 | December 18, 2008 at 03:40 AM