![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Starting Pitching Update | Main | Mark Teixeira Rumors: Saturday »
10:26pm: Dan Connolly of the Baltimore Sun reports the contract for Daniel Cabrera is a one-year deal worth $2.6 million, about a million less than he'd have been owed after arbitration.
1:24pm: According to MLB.com's Bill Ladson, the Nationals signed Daniel Cabrera to a one-year deal (pending a physical). One of Ladson's sources says the Nats beat out the Mets and Pirates for him. So far this offseason the Nationals have added Cabrera and Scott Olsen to their rotation.
Cabrera, 28 in May, made 30 starts for the Orioles in 2008 with a 5.25 ERA. His walks remained high, while his strikeout rate was way down and he lost 1.7mph off his average fastball. Cabrera's season ended in September with an elbow sprain, which did not require surgery.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053688131c970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nationals Sign Daniel Cabrera:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
for those who thought daniel couldn't pitch (which he can't) wait until you see him hit.. enjoy nats and best of luck to you daniel
Posted by: #1O'sfan | December 20, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Does this take them out of the race for Tex?? lol
Posted by: Umair | December 20, 2008 at 03:44 PM
How expensive was Tim Redding projecting to be? They must be paying at least a few mill for Cabrera, both a pretty bad but eat a decent amount of innings. Seems like either one would give you the same results.
Posted by: mford | December 20, 2008 at 03:44 PM
How on earth does Jim Bowden still have a job??
Posted by: MPM | December 20, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Now Cabrera has another backstop to throw WP's to and another league's hitters to hit with his infamous inability to throw anything near the strike zone.
This makes the Nats getting Tex even a higher option, since Cabrera on the mound as a starter means the Nats must be truly desperate for pitching period and they are going to need all the offensive support that they can get.
Posted by: johns | December 20, 2008 at 03:54 PM
alright! what a signing for my Nats, he'll get himself turned around for sure, and his redemption in a Nats uniform will be amazing!
*snickers*
*burst out in laughter*
ok, I couldn't say that with a straight face. I tried though.
Posted by: MrMadison | December 20, 2008 at 03:56 PM
The wild thing is a lot of you guys who are sh!tting on this move, there was a good chance your team was taking a hard look @ D-Cab (mets, jays, pirates are just a few teams mentioned to have interest)
Posted by: HammondsIsAStud | December 20, 2008 at 04:16 PM
I've had it up to here *puts hand at eyebrow level* with Jim Bowden. He's a horribel GM. Look what he did in Cincy and looks what he's doing now, its like the Kasten's have no say.
D-Cab has been wildly inconsistent and bascially every night he goes out, the team he plays for is guaranteed to lose. I hate this signing. Thank God it's only a year. I will be astounded if D. Cab turns things around and becomes respectable in 2009.
That being said, i will be happy if this is just a " he needed a change of scenery" thing.
Posted by: phoenix88 | December 20, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Scott Olsen
Dan Cabrera
Shawn Hill
John Lannan
Jason Bergman/Matt Chico
Is this the projected rotation for the 2009 Nationals or are they going to make another low risk high reward move?
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Cabrera is a great signing for them. Leaving the AL East can only make him better. Taking him out of Camden Yards can also help. His ERA was over 6 there each of the last 2 seasons. No DH is also a plus so in the end he could be a solid 4ish ERA.
Posted by: XD23 | December 20, 2008 at 04:57 PM
The Nats are moving in the right direction.
Posted by: viteminj | December 20, 2008 at 05:00 PM
this is hilarious...the Nationals might just be the biggest joke of all time
Posted by: Soxfan017 | December 20, 2008 at 05:00 PM
if the nationals were in the american league, this wouldnt be a horrible signing. dcab is an innings eater despite his control (or lack thereof).
however, this is a bad move because he is 0-11 with 11 K's at the plate and everytime he swings, it looks like he pulls/strains/dislocates something...
Posted by: lftyg33 | December 20, 2008 at 05:05 PM
Why is this a bad signing...? I don't get it. The guy has high upside despite being horrible last year, and the Nationals don't have any aspirations of contending this year. If it works out great, if not you cut him lose next year.
What's the problem with this move? I love it for Washington.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 20, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Soxfan017-
No i think the Sox were pretty big joke before they finally won a World Series this decade. And their bandwagon fanbase is sad.
Posted by: HammondsIsAStud | December 20, 2008 at 05:31 PM
CubbyFan23, you're partially right, it's not a bad move for Washington. The problem is that I think most people realize that Cabrerra will never amount to much and that while he might still seem to have some upside it's highly unlikely that he'll reach it. Just too much evidence to the contrary. If this is the Nat's or Jim Bowden's attempt at catching lightning in a bottle, it's a weak attempt at best.
I think D-Cab could become serviceable in the NL with a good pitching coach and a pitchers park, but otherwise he's pretty much useless to any team hoping to contend. Essentially the Nat's could have gotten some young, cheap guy any number of ways that could have done as well as Cabrerra.
Posted by: pageian | December 20, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Not many pitchers are known for being great hitters. Cabrera did not even start playing baseball until late in his teens. Hitting ML pitching is not exactly easy. So what if he is 0-14 with 14 Ks. Who here wouldn't be.
Posted by: XD23 | December 20, 2008 at 05:34 PM
"CubbyFan23, you're partially right, it's not a bad move for Washington. The problem is that I think most people realize that Cabrerra will never amount to much and that while he might still seem to have some upside it's highly unlikely that he'll reach it. Just too much evidence to the contrary. If this is the Nat's or Jim Bowden's attempt at catching lightning in a bottle, it's a weak attempt at best."
But at least it's better than no attempts. The alternative now it seems was Tim Redding, we all know who he is and what he's gonna give you. If Cabrera is basically close to the same pitcher now, what's the harm in giving him a rotation slot over Redding for equal price?
I don't really know that there's any other guys out there on the market that have the same low cost with high upside combo that Cabrera offers on a one year deal.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 20, 2008 at 05:37 PM
I'll be legitimately frightened when Cabrera faces the Mets. He might accidentally hit one of our players with a fastball!
That said, not a terrible signing for the Nationals. Nice to see the Mets were at least in on him. Now Omar, go get Tim Redding.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 20, 2008 at 05:40 PM
Good signing by my Nats. I've been secretly hoping they'd sign D-Cab. We just need to sign maybe another starter, plus a 1B power bat and we're set.
Btw, Olsen would be our second starter, Lannan's our ace fo sho. D-Cab would be the 3rd starter.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | December 20, 2008 at 05:53 PM
Cabrera is better for the Nats than Redding. He is younger and has more raw talent than Redding could ever dream for.
Acta completely overworked Redding in the first half last year (not that he had many other options) and Redding faded after the All-Star break.
1st Half: (7-3) 3.85 ERA 114.2 IP
2nd Half: (3-8) 6.82 ERA 67.1 IP
The last time Redding pitched as much as 150 innings was 2003 with the Astros and he followed that with 5 years of crap until 2008.
Good luck to whoever gets Redding and his dead arm next year.
Posted by: SpashCity | December 20, 2008 at 05:57 PM
C Jesus Flores
FB Mark Teixeira*
SB Willie Harris
TB Ryan Zimmerman
SS Chriatian Guzman
LF Josh Willingham
CF Lastings Milledge
RF Elijah Dukes
SP John Lannan
SP Scott Olsen
SP Dan Cabrera
SP Shawn Hill
SP Collin Balester
CP Joel Hanrahan
RP Saul Rivera
RP Steven Shell
RP Garrett Mock
RP Matt Chico
RP Jason Bergman
RP Mike Hinckley
They should really consider trading Austin Kearns to get some pitching help to boost the pen...
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Low risk, very high reward type deal...
Im sure that the Nationals are trying to trade Kearns. There just isnt alot of value with him coming off of a injury plagued year.
There is also so many good DH/OF options out there for free agency.
Posted by: Zack VanNieuwenhze | December 20, 2008 at 07:02 PM
They should go after Brad Penny, he's a good pitcher when he's healthy and right, and could be a good upside buy.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 20, 2008 at 07:11 PM
They should go after Brad Penny, he's a good pitcher when he's healthy and right, and could be a good upside buy.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 20, 2008 at 07:14 PM
Scribbletone, that's a good idea, him or Mark Mulder.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | December 20, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Rolling, it's probably more like this...
S. Olsen l
J. Lannan l
D. Cabrera
C. Balester
J. Zimmermann
with Sharion Martis in the wings. I wouldn't be suprised if Cabrera goes to the pen, either.
Posted by: AnonymousSources | December 20, 2008 at 08:13 PM
Shairon*
Posted by: AnonymousSources | December 20, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Cabrera SUCKS. He averages 100 BB's a season. Just because he can K a few guys doesn't mean he's good.
Posted by: Rob M. | December 20, 2008 at 09:23 PM
DCsportsguy,
You better hope the Nationals don't go after Mulder. The guy has started only 23 games over the last 3 seasons. Typically, most pitchers have pitched at least 90 over that span. And you think he has the same upside as Penny (or is in the same category)? No offense, but just because Penny is coming off an injury year, doesn't really mean he and Mulder are in the same category.
That said, for the Nationals it would be a VERY good idea for them to sign Penny. He'll come relatively cheap (probably less than $10 million per year, at most a two-year incentive contract), and as a Dodgers fan, when he's on...he is one of the best pitchers out there. He has a terrific mid-upper 90's fastball, and a great change/splitter combo, and a nasty hook.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 20, 2008 at 09:30 PM
AnonymousSources:
By J. Zimmerman do you mean Jason Bergman? Because i havent heard of a J. Zimmerman.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:30 PM
The Nationals would be in good shape to compete this year if they added *Brad Penny*, *Mark Teixeira*, Dan Cabrera, Scott Olsen, and Josh Willingham in one offseason...
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:32 PM
And though Daniel Cabrera has a pretty abysmal career line (let's be honest, its pretty ugly), he SHOULD, he might or might not because he is completely unpredictable, improve in the much more hitter friendly Nationals home-park, and the much more pitcher friendly NL (especially coming from the Beast of the East; the AL East).
I would predict, at best, a stat line just below his career average road stats, which are:
24-27, 4.86ERA, 1.54WHIP, .253 Opposing BA...but, more importantly, he has given up only 35 homers away, as apposed to 53 at home - which could help him.
I predict this line for him (a little generous):
11-12, 4.65 ERA, 1.45WHIP, about 10-15 fewer walks (AL east has some VERY patient teams - Yankees and Boston are always tops in BB's and OBP), and about 15-20 more K's than his career averages.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 20, 2008 at 09:36 PM
2004 Bal 28 27 1 1 147.2 145 85 82 14 89 76 12 8 1 0 0 5.00
2005 Bal 29 29 0 0 161.1 144 92 81 14 87 157 10 13 0 0 -- 4.52
2006 Bal 26 26 2 1 148.0 130 82 78 11 104 157 9 10 0 0 -- 4.74
2007 Bal 34 34 1 0 204.1 207 133 126 25 108 166 9 18 0 0 -- 5.55
2008 Bal 30 30 2 0 180.0 199 109 105 24 90 95 8 10 0 0 -- 5.25
Total -- 147 146 6 2 841.1 825 501 472 88 478 651 48 59 1 0 0 5.05
If not for such a horrendous 2007 season his numbers would be acceptable. Especially for pitching in the NL. All he needs to do is somehow learn to control his stuff. He is an intimidating force on the mound and if he learns how to control his pitches he could surprise some people, especially if the Nationals do improve their offense.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:47 PM
SEASON TEAM G GS CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB SO W L SV HLD BLSV ERA
2004 Bal 28 27 1 1 147.2 145 85 82 14 89 76 12 8 1 0 0 5.00
2005 Bal 29 29 0 0 161.1 144 92 81 14 87 157 10 13 0 0 -- 4.52
2006 Bal 26 26 2 1 148.0 130 82 78 11 104 157 9 10 0 0 -- 4.74
2007 Bal 34 34 1 0 204.1 207 133 126 25 108 166 9 18 0 0 -- 5.55
2008 Bal 30 30 2 0 180.0 199 109 105 24 90 95 8 10 0 0 -- 5.25
Total -- 147 146 6 2 841.1 825 501 472 88 478 651 48 59 1 0 0 5.05
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Sorry if thats unclear...
2004 12-8
2005 10-13
2006 9-10
2007 9-18
2008 8-10
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:50 PM
Nighthawk, most teams think that their #4 and #5 starters should at LEAST, have a sub 4.50 ERA, and eat innings. Cabrera has been over that his entire career. He's never had an ERA below 4.52, which is not acceptable by any means. Maybe for a #5 starter it is, but certainly not for a #3.
I still think his numbers WILL certainly improve, but because he has such horrendous control, not very high strike out totals, and not necessarily over-powering stuff, his numbers will improve not by much. I said, generously, he will have a 4.65ERA (which is just below his career road ERA), and a WHIP of 1.45ish, assuming he'll give up less hits in the NL, and less walks considering that AL East teams are notorious for being patient at the dish.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 20, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Zimmermann won't be up in '09.
I see Lannan-Olsen-Balester-Cabrera-Hill, with Martis and Bergmann around.
"Nighthawk, most teams think that their #4 and #5 starters should at LEAST, have a sub 4.50 ERA, and eat innings. Cabrera has been over that his entire career. He's never had an ERA below 4.52, which is not acceptable by any means. Maybe for a #5 starter it is, but certainly not for a #3."
There are very few teams with the liberty of saying that their #5 starter has under a 4.50 ERA or that they averaged 4.50 ERA production out of their #5 rotation spot. Most don't. League average is slightly below a 4.50 ERA, and that's factoring in all the super-studs and aces. So, your worst starter will probably be slightly below the league average.
That being said, Cabrera is a #5 at best right now.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 20, 2008 at 10:47 PM
MrBlake,
If Mulder could somehow regain the form he had when he was with the A's, then it'd be a good signing. Randy St. Claire works wonders with things like that.
I do hope they sign Penny, however.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | December 20, 2008 at 10:57 PM
AnonymousSources:
By J. Zimmerman do you mean Jason Bergman? Because i havent heard of a J. Zimmerman.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 20, 2008 at 09:30 PM
no, he means Jordan Zimmermann, who is our top pitching prospect.
of course you haven't heard of a J. Zimmerman. the only thing anyone ever knows about the Nationals is that they lost 100 games last year. *shrug*
Posted by: MrMadison | December 20, 2008 at 11:37 PM
If Mulder regains his form? I highly doubt that he will. Three consecutive years of shoulder problems, and no real improvement in sight, I'd say Mulder has most likely seen his prime pass.
Yes, there is a chance he could recover and come back to form, but that chance is so small it isn't even worth it. Unless Mulder can prove he can stay healthy, he is a financial liability to any team that tries to sign him.
And what pitchers has St. Claire worked "wonders" with? I'm sorry but if St. Claire was as amazing as you say he is, then why were the Nationals 24th out of 30 teams in team ERA? You can say a pitching coach works wonders, but if there is no real evidence of that, then there is no point in saying it.
I'm not bashing on the Nationals, nor you or the Nationals coaching staff, but you can't make a statement like "Randy St. Claire works wonders like that...[helping pitchers return to their prime form]", and expect to be taken seriously.
I.E.
Odalis Perez. His "prime form" was in 2002 and 2004 when he had 3.00 and 3.25 respective ERA's. His career ERA is 4.46, and his ERA last year with the Nats was 4.34 - a tick below his career ERA. Hardly a "wonder".
Just trying to make the point that signing Mulder, at this time, as a VERY, VERY, bad idea.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 21, 2008 at 12:46 AM
Hmmm. Zimmermann looks very impressive so far for you guys.
In 35 minor league starts:
15-5, 2.74ERA, 1.14WHIP, 187IP, 205K's, 65BB's.
Not too shabby. What is his "stuff" consist of?
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM
The Nationals officially have the worst clubhouse in Major League Baseball.
Can you imagine the locker room antics and outside life of Scott Olsen, Daniel Cabrera, and Elijah Dukes.
Geez, they may be worse then the Cowboys.
Posted by: Mordy | December 21, 2008 at 01:19 AM
It is really hard for me to believe that this guy is going to turn things around with the Nats... I mean sure, it's great that he can eat up innings, but I would rather have a guy throw only 180 IP with a 4.00ish ERA than a guy who throws over 200 innings and an ERA and BB/9 over 5.00 ... But hey, that's just me, I'm not a baseball mastermind like Jim Bowden.........
Posted by: GoTribe | December 21, 2008 at 01:28 AM
Hmmm. Zimmermann looks very impressive so far for you guys.
In 35 minor league starts:
15-5, 2.74ERA, 1.14WHIP, 187IP, 205K's, 65BB's.
Not too shabby. What is his "stuff" consist of?
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM
mid-90s fastball...curve, low-80s changeup, and slider
Posted by: MrMadison | December 21, 2008 at 01:42 AM
The Nationals officially have the worst clubhouse in Major League Baseball.
Can you imagine the locker room antics and outside life of Scott Olsen, Daniel Cabrera, and Elijah Dukes.
Geez, they may be worse then the Cowboys.
Posted by: Mordecai | December 21, 2008 at 01:19 AM
I keep seeing comments from random posters about Cabrera being a clubhouse problem, but otherwise I've not seen any evidence of it.
most criticisms from credible sources are merely that he can't throw strikes.
Posted by: MrMadison | December 21, 2008 at 01:43 AM
I keep seeing comments from random posters about Cabrera being a clubhouse problem, but otherwise I've not seen any evidence of it.
most criticisms from credible sources are merely that he can't throw strikes.
Posted by: MrMadison | December 21, 2008 at 01:43 AM
Cabrera is more of the on-field problem with beanings and all. Or to sum it all up, seems to be a hothead.
Still Dukes is a ticking time bomb, and I'm sure Olsen has had problems with alcohol and his attitude in the past. Plus, Lastings seems to rub people the wrong way.
Posted by: Mordy | December 21, 2008 at 02:29 AM
I don't think it's a good signing cabrerea is a career 2-10 with a 5.78 era in 15 starts career against the nl, and he can't bunt to save his life.
Posted by: Dj 26 | December 21, 2008 at 07:55 AM
Its a solid signing. Leaving the AL East makes anyone better. His ERA on the Road the last 2 seasons were 4.47 in '08 and 4.26 in '07. Also pitching away from Camden Yards can't hurt him (6.28 & 6.42 last 2 seasons). Also he was a solid 4.33 ERA last year before the AS Break and his 'mysterious injury' ruined his 2nd half.
Posted by: XD23 | December 21, 2008 at 08:22 AM
wonder whats the point on giving 3kk for a guy who will post an ERA over 5.00, cant pitch strikes and dont win 10 games since 2004.
Just throw some minor leaguer there to play for league minimum and post similar (if noth better) numbers.
Posted by: mwozn | December 21, 2008 at 09:20 AM
"Cabrera is more of the on-field problem with beanings and all. Or to sum it all up, seems to be a hothead.
Still Dukes is a ticking time bomb, and I'm sure Olsen has had problems with alcohol and his attitude in the past. Plus, Lastings seems to rub people the wrong way."
Not intentional beanings though. Cabrera has major control issues, which is why he leads MLB in hit batters. That's also the reason why he was non-tendered.
I wouldn't.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 21, 2008 at 10:32 AM
i love bean balls, i wish the pirates got him, that salomon torres head shot that he gave sosa was classic
Posted by: yokedog22 | December 21, 2008 at 11:13 AM
"
Scott Olsen
Dan Cabrera
Shawn Hill
John Lannan
Jason Bergman/Matt Chico
Is this the projected rotation for the 2009 Nationals or are they going to make another low risk high reward move?
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09}"
If they lans Tex, they have to trade Johnson, several teams, including the A's, have Johnson's medical records. if Johnson is treaded look for the nats to just young pitching in return.
Tha Nats haven't mentioned Chico at all this off-season, so i'll be surprised if he's in the rotation. They;ve said Jordan Zimmerman, who pitched very well in hihg class AA, has a shot at making the rotation in 2009.
I see the rotation being:
John Lannan
Scott Olsen
Jason Bergman
Sean Hill
Jordan Zimmerman/ Colin Balester.
I think they'll use Martis and Chico out of the 'pen
Posted by: phoenix88 | December 21, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Maybe demoting Cabrera to the pen will help him work on his control more? He has the makeup to be an intimidating late-inning reliever (though his makeup is more suited to a starter), and maybe a half-season, or full-season, in the pen would be just the trick to help him get on track with his control.
Going to the pen allows you to work a little more on your mechanics, delivery, rhythm, and control.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 21, 2008 at 04:23 PM
the braves needed danial cabrail
Posted by: noah | December 21, 2008 at 07:13 PM
the nats rotation will most likely look like this:
Lannan (LHP)
Olsen (LHP)
Balester (RHP)
Cabrera (RHP)
Zimmermann/Hill/Free Agent signing (RHP)
Jordan Zimmermann is going to be a good one, we'll see if he wins a spot out of spring or if the club elects to bring him along slowly and have him start off in AAA-Syracuse.
Posted by: HammondsIsAStud | December 21, 2008 at 08:41 PM
The Nats just signed one of the best low-risk high reward guys in the market. Anyone arguing this is a bad baseball move should reference AJ Pierzynski for Joe Nathan, Boof Bonser and Fransisco Lirano.
Posted by: Stegs | December 21, 2008 at 10:35 PM
The Nats just signed one of the best low-risk high reward guys in the market. Anyone arguing this is a bad baseball move should reference AJ Pierzynski for Joe Nathan, Boof Bonser and Fransisco Lirano.
Posted by: Stegs | December 21, 2008 at 10:36 PM
hey daniel has the arsenal to be a good pitcher. i think he is due for a winning season with or without the nats. also this isnt a bad rotation im staring to see.
Posted by: HandsHannon | December 22, 2008 at 04:06 PM