![]() |
|
|
| |
« Manny Ramirez Rumors: Thursday | Main | Twins Still Exploring Shortstop Options »
Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe discusses the possibility of Jake Peavy being traded to the Red Sox:
The Red Sox have "some" interest in Peavy, but as of a few days ago the teams had not entertained any substantive trade talks as Padres GM Kevin Towers knew that Boston was not on Peavy's wish list. But now that talks with Atlanta and the Cubs have broken down, Towers needs a new team to deal with and the 27-year-old Peavy, according to his agent, Barry Axelrod, probably would OK a deal to Boston. But if there's a Mark Teixeira splash, the Red Sox might not have the money to entertain it.
Padres CEO Sandy Alderson recently said the team is no longer actively pursuing a Peavy trade, but left the door open in case a team approaches them. While the Red Sox easily have the young pitching to get it done, they'd also have the leverage to shoot for a bargain in a trade with San Diego. Kevin Towers has historically been Theo Epstein's most frequent trade partner, but keep in mind that Peavy is in control.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536858c4a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Peavy-Boston Possibility:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I for one as a Red Sox fan is not going to rip CC, in fact that is one reason I feel we should move on Peavy.
Sabathia is the real deal.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Cy...
I think you may have thought I was directing my comments toward you. I wasn't. Your points are all valid and logical. You're right about the whole "park factor" thing too. Peavy is a frontline Ace in any park and either league.
Posted by: Kyle | December 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Eric: "As for the people who keep ripping on Sabathia, he is one of the top 5 pitchers in the game, is left-handed, is young, is a great athlete"
For instance, he has the girth to be an offensive lineman in the NFL.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM
"Better than all those guys"...
You're damn right he is!
Peavy is one of the four or five best pitchers in the game right now. And he also doesn't weigh 300+ pounds. I don't care what anyone says, if you weigh that much you are not going to last too long putting in 200+ innings a year. It's just not possible. The strain on your legs alone would be enough to start ity. The knees will go from all the pressure. The joints aren't made to handle the sort of pressure a pitcher that size will put on them either. And that's just his legs. His back is just as likely to go out first. When you tip the scales at over 300lbs. then a serious injury isn't just a possibility, it's a certainty. I'm NOT "ripping" Sabathia. He's got one of the best left arms around and last year he as great. But that still doesn't justify the history making contract he just got from th Yanks.
Posted by: Kyle | December 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
If the Sox were to get Peavy AND Tex, we'd have to suspend the league. I'll put the over/under on World Series titles over the next 5 years at 3.5
Posted by: SabermetricsGuy | December 18, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Well if the Yankees get Manny along with the addition of CC, that might be very close...The two teams probably win the next 5 WS haha
Oh, and dont' bring up CC joking in the playoffs, because Peavy is worse
Posted by: mike923 | December 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
"Offenive line"...
He's last longer in the NFL.
Posted by: Kyle | December 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Weight jokes are funny but that might be what makes him so overpowering.
I was against the signing but after that 3 year opt out I like it. Yankees end up getting Sabathia's remaining good years, and 2 picks when he leaves. By then Joba will be more than willing and able to take over the #1 spot IMO.
I don't think any Yankees fan would have any problem trading the farm to get Peavy either BTW. He was downright nasty when I saw him against the Yanks and I would welcome him with open arms.
Posted by: Gleb | December 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I dont care if a guy looks like Elmer Fudd, just as long as he can throw that pellet.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Sabathia is one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball, but Peavy is probably #1.
Posted by: baxter | December 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM
I think the list is
C.C
Halladay
Santana
Lee
Peavy
*Not in any order*
Posted by: Gleb | December 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Lee has to have more than 1 great season to even be in the discussion. Might as well throw Dempster in there too, right?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM
"Sabathia is one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball, but Peavy is probably #1."
Not even close. Peavy may not even be a top 5 pitcher at this point. His slider lost some bite off of it last season, and his numbers were helped a good deal by pitching in Petco anyways.
I'd argue that the 5 best pitchers in baseball are Lincecum, Halladay, Sabathia, Santana, and after those four, there is just a toss up between Peavy, Beckett, Cliff Lee, Hamels and maybe Felix Hernandez. Guys like Sheets, Harden and Burnett would be in the conversation as well if they could stay healthy.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 12:56 PM
*choking, not joking haha
Posted by: mike923 | December 18, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Again, I think you have to see more than 1 good year out of Lee before calling him in the top 5 pitchers in baseball. He was last year though...but then again, that makes Dempster a better pitcher than Peavy...which we all know isn't true.
Cliff Lee is a 29 year old with a 4.15 career ERA and a 106 career ERA+. He is not yet a top 5 pitcher in baseball.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Lincecum, Hamels, Santana. The next two are a matter of opinion among the guys you have been listing although Webb deserves consideration at least as much as some of the names mentioned.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 18, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Just my opionion.
1. Halladay
2. Santana
3. Lincecum
4. Hamels
5. Sabathia
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 02:29 PM
I'll agree that Hamels is number five on my list as well actually, now that I've thought about it.
Aduncaroo, I think we may have the same top five. The only issue is that it's extremely difficult to determine who's actually better than the others.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 02:37 PM
I think I'd put Peavy as 6.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Agreed Scribble. Its tough...Especially after the first three, whom I think are in a class of their own.
Harden is definitely up there too...his numbers last year were absolutely sick. ERA of 2 in 148 IP?
After coming over from Oakland, he went 71 IP with a 1.77 ERA, WHIP < 1, and an ERA+ of 252(!).
As a Cubs fan, man I hope he is relatively healthy next year.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 02:42 PM
I'd agree that Peavy is #6 going into next season.
It's tough putting him in front of guys like Webb, King Felix, Lackey and Beckett, though.
Although I would be shocked if he still was by years end. I'd expect someone to emerge this season like Lincecum did. Maybe someone like Felix, Liriano, Danks, Billingsley or Gallardo.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 02:53 PM
I think we can all agree that Harden would be #1 if he was durable.
But then again, durability is HUGE, as us Cubs fans know too well (Kerry, Prior, sigh..).
Durability is what puts Halladay in a league of his own. The guy takes the ball every five days, pitches great, and is fully capable of going all nine innings. It's unreal how good he is for having such a relaxed delivery. I'd probably take Halladay over any pitcher for 2009.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 02:57 PM
YOu could say the same about Santana.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 18, 2008 at 03:29 PM
The top 5 starting pitchers in order
Santana
Lincecum
Halladay
Hamels
Peavy
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 05:30 PM
I will be more like
Boston get
JaKe PeAvY
San diego gets
Clay
Bowden
Lars
Kalish
Lowell
Another prospect
They want at least 6 players
They could use lowell but would prob trade lowell
If you don't get texiera
Then replace lowell with chris carter and then maybe another mid level prospect. They have the players to get it done .
Theo must decide
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 05:37 PM
Ill say manny delcarmen for salty if not good then for gerald laird
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 05:39 PM
If that happens it look scary for those yankees
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 05:40 PM
"Boston get
JaKe PeAvY
San diego gets
Clay
Bowden
Lars
Kalish
Lowell
Another prospect
They want at least 6 players"
Never, ever going to happen.
Just because the Padres want six players doesn't mean you give them six players like that.
That's two great pitching prospects, arguably the best 1B prospect in baseball, a plus defensive 3B that has solid potential with the bat on a reasonable deal (despite coming off injury), a solid OF prospect and an additional prospect.
That's a god awful deal for the Red Sox.
I don't get why people think San Diego would go after Anderson anyways, considering they have Gonzalez, and Kyle Blanks in AA.
How about Peavy for Clay Buchholz, Nick Hagadone, Ryan Kalish, Daniel Bard, Yamaico Navarro and Luis Exposito.
The Pads get their elite pitching prospect in Buchholz, as well as two very good arms in Hagadone and Bard. On top of that they get a solid OF prospect in Kalish, a potential quality SS in Navarro, and a potential long term catcher in Exposito.
And they get to keep Bowden, Masterson, Reddick, Anderson and Lowrie.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 07:25 PM
I don't see why the Red Sox should offer far more than the Cubs or Braves did. In fact, I think you could argue that the offer I proposed is superior to any offer from either one of those teams. The Padres wanted pitching, and neither of the other deals was big on pitching.
Meanwhile, my proposed deal gives them a freaking bounty of pitchers (Buchholz, Bard, Hagadone), as well as three solid although unspectacular position prospects.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 08:53 PM
Sure yea right clay is not a elite pitching prospects he's horrible
and if its for a ace its worth it.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 09:07 PM
Padres would never accept a deal like that. An ace that gets 15 per a year these days is a bargain and he is locked up for a while now.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 18, 2008 at 09:10 PM
"How about Peavy for Clay Buchholz, Nick Hagadone, Ryan Kalish, Daniel Bard, Yamaico Navarro and Luis Exposito."
Jesus Christ that is alot.
That my friend is Towers having a heart attack if Theo gave a thumps up..
Buchholz is better than Bowden..
Kalish is like their number 9 prospect..
I love Navarro, good glove, weird style of hitting but gets it done
Hagadone has a chance to be the best out of that group
Bard is one year away from being a good bullpen arm, if he can keep his control he has closer written all over him
Exposito is a awesome behind the plate, and he has the chance to hit as well..
So hell no..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 18, 2008 at 09:14 PM
" Padres would never accept a deal like that. An ace that gets 15 per a year these days is a bargain and he is locked up for a while now."
If you're talking about that 6for1 deal you have no idea what your talking about
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 18, 2008 at 09:15 PM
I don't think people understand that your teams top prospects might very well be just average on the grand scope of prospects..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 18, 2008 at 09:18 PM
"" Padres would never accept a deal like that. An ace that gets 15 per a year these days is a bargain and he is locked up for a while now.""
Yeah.. IF Boston was willing to do my proposed deal, Towers would probably cry.
"Kalish is like their number 9 prospect.."
Not any more. He had an okay year but showed practically no power. It's not totally clear that he can stick in center field, and if he can't, then there is almost no way he becomes a good RF unless he posts some great OBP's. He didn't make their 2009 BA Top 10 either, by the way.
The Red Sox would surely give up the position guys, but the pitchers would likely be difficult for Boston. Buchholz is of course the potential ace, but then again Hagadone also has a huge arm since coming off of surgury. And, Bard has a monster arm as well, although he can't harness it enough to be a starter.
Maybe instead of Hagadone, a lesser pitcher like Stolmy Pimental would be more fair?
That brings out the offer to:
Peavy for Buchholz, Bard, Pimental, Kalish, Navarro and Exposito.
Still a haul, but keeping Hagadone would be nice for Boston, considering his potential. I think Clay goes to SD in any Peavy deal though.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 18, 2008 at 09:27 PM
"Not any more. He had an okay year but showed practically no power. It's not totally clear that he can stick in center field, and if he can't, then there is almost no way he becomes a good RF unless he posts some great OBP's. He didn't make their 2009 BA Top 10 either, by the way."
Okay this is what I saw in Lancaster
I dont think he has any power to show.. He hit like .320 in his first 30 abs or so and got hurt and sat for a few days and tanked after..
Hes damn good, and he didnt play center cause Jason Place played there.. Hes on the SoxProspects top 10 though not that it matters.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 18, 2008 at 09:37 PM
As discussed above, never did Towers say he wanted at least 6 players. That's just simply not true.
Towers is on the record for saying he'll take quality over quantity every day.
Initial talks with the Braves rumored a 3 for 1 deal (the first rumors talked about Hanson, Escobar, Schafer). Those are 3 quality guys, and Towers would have taken that in a heartbeat.
If Boston sends Bucholz, another top IF/OF prospect and a 2nd good SP prospect, it's done.
Posted by: tomfromsd | December 19, 2008 at 02:52 AM
Of course he would've taken Hanson, Escobar and Schafer for Peavy.
That would've been a freaking steal. That would've been exactly like this trade, look at the format:
Big time ace in exchange for elite pitching and CF prospects, as well as an elite young shortstop.
Also known as: Bartolo Colon for Cliff Lee, Grady Sizemore and Brandon Phillips.
Hmm..
The Red Sox likely wouldn't deal Lowrie though.
Obviously if they were willing to give up Buchholz, Reddick and Bard, the Padres would probably do it, but it's just not likely that happens.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 19, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Many of you folks are not getting it. The Padres owners are in the middle of a divorce and they have to split their assets. The Padres were losing money anyway and now we are in the beginning of the worse recession since the 1930s. The Padres will almost give Peavey away at some point to move salary. Offer Bard and maybe Kalish and this is a done deal. That's definitely substantial enough value to do this deal. Very few teams are in a position to pick up new salaries at all. The Mets owners just lost $300 mil on the Maloff fiasco. The Yanks just signed very expensive pitchers. The Cubs are being sold. Atlanta is too cheap when it comes right down to it. The Redsox are in a good position on this one. Look what happened to the price of gas when demand went down 2%. MLB free agents better sign fast while they can. The landscape is changing quickly.
Posted by: Boomerangs.com | December 21, 2008 at 10:19 PM
LOLOLOL their starting rotation would consist of...
1) Jake Peavy
2) Josh Beckett
3) Jon Lester
4) Daisuke Matsuzaka
5) Tim Wakefield
WOW that would be nice
Posted by: MB8615 | December 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM
I forgot about the colon trade that sent cliff lee, sizemore, and brandon phillips to cleveland....wow what a steal that was...gota love those montreal expos
Posted by: MB8615 | December 22, 2008 at 10:29 AM