MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Boras Contacts Dodgers To Discuss Manny | Main | Dodgers Sign Claudio Vargas »

Reds Sign Willy Taveras To Two-Year Deal

WEDNESDAY: Taveras' deal with the Reds is worth $6.25MM over two years.

SATURDAY: The Reds have signed Willy Taveras to a two-year contract according to Hal McCoy of the Dayton Daily News. The terms of the deal aren't yet known.

The 27-year-old figures to play center field and lead off for the Reds. He's stolen at least 30 bases in each of the last four years, including 2008 when he set a career high with 68 steals in spite of a .308 OBP.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105369f2d05970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reds Sign Willy Taveras To Two-Year Deal:

Comments

Corey Patterson, Part Deux!!!!!! Dusty Baker's Fantasy Fulfilled.

Who's ABs is Taveras going to take???

But, umm, why a 2 year deal? Ridiculous.

Walt, what's wrong with you?

lol dusty

I know everybody is hating this signing, but if he can get back to 2007 form it could be an ok deal depending on the money...though I would def rather Rocco Baldelli

Dickerson, Taveras, Bruce is a pretty interesting outfield..

Dickerson-LF
Taveras-CF
Bruce-RF

That's not bad.

YOu can still sign Baldelli, considering that even though he was misdaignosed you still don't know how if he could play everday. Maybe a Baldelli as a 4th OF?

I am not going to pound the signing just yet. I don't understand two years though. How many teams were in on Willy? I think the White Sox had some interst recently.

Baldelli can now become a White Sox.

Well YFS78, there goes the best viable CF option the Yanks had for 2009 and a 60+ SB threat lack of getting on base or not, he would have added a dimension the Yanks are missing.

I think the Reds can still land Baldelli. A lot of people are pounding this deal, but don't forget Taveras hit .320 when in 07' when the Rockies went to the World Series. This gives the Reds a lead off man that they have desperately needed. I'm not sure about two years though. If they can land Baldelli or Wiggington along with him, not a bad at all.

Dickerson - LF
Taveras - CF
Bruce - RF

yeah yanksfan thats not bad, not bad for the rest of the NL Central.

YFS78, Why would the Yanks have wanted to sign Taveras? They don't NEED a guy who can steal 60 bases, have too many outfielders as it is, and Taveras hit .250 in the NL West. Even if last year was a bad fluke, imagine what he would be like in the unltra-competitive AL East.

Sorry Yanksfan78, I meant to say Johns is my last post.

Yeah I'm not happy with Dickerson, Taveras, and Bruce starting everyday. While I'm ok with this signing, I'd still like a better option in LF. Dickerson needs to platoon with Taveras, not be an everyday starter until he can put together a full season of what he did at the end of last year. We still need that Power bat from the Right side of the plate. The reds need to open the pocket book and land Manny lol. I don't think they should over pay for Pat Burrell

This has the potential for ending very badly for the Reds, but Taveras DID have a .367 OBP for the Rockies in 2007. Of course that came with a flukish .320 AVG (.371 BABIP). Dusty will love this guy.

Gardner, according to most "outsiders", is the Yanks designated "can't hit but can run like a beast" player. Taveras would've been redundant..but thanks anyway. lol.

charliescrabbles: No good? You can still sign another OF bat ya know?

Unless Taveras is a bench player this is a horrible signing. He has to hit .300 to be even a average player becuase he has no power to speak of and can't take a walk.

The Reds already had two superior players on the roster in Dickerson and Hopper that could have done the job just as well.

As for 07, he was only a part timer that year.

The Reds desperately need guys that can get on base, Taveras is so not one of these guys.

Unless the Reds were planing on winning in 09 there is no reason not to give Dickerson the starting slot in CF till he proves he isn't deserving of it.

Dusty isn't comfortable with it, tell that toothpick chewing moron to deal with it.

if Taveras is the minority partner in a platoon with Dickerson in CF, then im very happy with this deal. unfortunately, Dusty Baker is the manager and its a two year deal, so that is not happening.

yanksfan, we could sign another OF, but i would rather have done that and forgotten about Taveras entirely. he's basically a more expensive Norris Hopper, and that is what really sticks in my craw.

WHEW! Thanks for saving Kenny from himself, Walt!

i like the 09 reds i think theyll suprise alot of us
phillips, bruce, votto, edison, cueto, harrang, arroyo, hopper, keppinger

Is it wrong for me to be extremely happy about this signing simply because it means Kenny Williams can't be tricked by his grinderness and attempt to sign him?

They have the pitching, just not the offense. A bunch of guys that are either hot or very cold. Votto and Bruce are the only ones so far that have a chance to be more then that.

Only if you send the Reds Dye and Lillibridge for Bailey and another minor leaguer.

WOuld you guys be willing to take a flier on a guy like Matsui to play LF and possibly become your clean up guy? I know Swisher would be a better fit but I don't think you guys would want to pay the price we'd want. Is Matsui or Nady for Homer Bailey and a lower level guy realistic?

time for an OBP showdown b/w Gathright and Taveras, first to get theirs 40 points higher than their average is playing PS3....

YES! YES! YES! thank you Cincinnati!

you've saved Jim Bowden from himself!

*does the "No-Taveras-In-DC" dance*

YanksFanSince78: I don't think it is. Despite his crappy numbers, Bailey still registers very high in the minds of the Reds. They still think he can succeed.

Bad move - $ could be spent better - Not good enough for AL
Walt work on bullpen - 2yrs Reds crazy

no way i trade Bailey for Matsui or Nady or Swisher or anybody the Yanks are offering. the Reds want a righty, so i'd be more inclined to trade for Nady, but frankly i dont think he's worth anything more than a few middling prospects. he's an average LF defensively with an .800 OPS. while there is value in that, it isnt really that much. i'd much rather get Swisher, as the Reds sorely need OBP. and i would imagine Nady would cost more than Swisher, as Swisher had a career low year last year and Nady had a career high year. give us Swisher for Josh Roenicke and youve got a deal.

To those lambasting--It's December 27th. Burrell, Dunn, Manny, Baldelli, Wigginton, and Hairston are still free agents(don't worry, not saying the Reds have a shot at Manny or Dunn, just saying they're out there), and Dye, Matsui, Nady, Swisher, and Rios are all trade candidates. The offseason ain't over yet. And Norris Hopper? Seriously? You gotta be kidding me, right? Right?????

check the stats grizzlyfox. Willy Taveras = Norris Hopper.

Williy? Do people even edit some of these articles?

"Baldelli can now become a White Sox.

Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | December 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM"


Don't jinx it!

I would love to see rios come to cincy

Oh god, please Baldelli to the White Sox. That would be phenomenal.

This should open up the Juan Pierre Sweepstakes now that we have a winner for Willy Taveras

"The Reds desperately need guys that can get on base, Taveras is so not one of these guys."

True, but...

"Dude, guys that get on base only clog the bases."

-Dusty

Huge downgrade from Hairston Jr. LOL

Gvelta, I have no problem agreeing that the NL West is the weakest division, but a low batting average in that division doesn't necessarily mean much in comparison to the rest of baseball. After all, with the unbalanced schedule, all year Taveras had to deal with Lincecum and Cain on the Giants; Billingsley and Lowe on the Dodgers; Webb, Haren, and Big Unit on the D-Backs; and Peavy on the Padres. Those are tough battles for any hitter...

Hairston mostly played the infield, or so I thought?

Huge downgrade to Hairston? Hairston is a lifetime .260 hitter and is not known for stealing bases throughout his career.

Taveras is an upgrade for defense in CF and if he returns to 2007 form, will be worth every penny we're paying him.

I honestly think Reds fans WANT something to complain about and WANT to lose every year. Just like Cubs fans, Reds fans LIKE to lose.

To Charliescrabbles---I didn't have to check stats before I posted, because I knew this is what they would show:
Hopper: 356 career ABs in three years, Taveras has had more than that each of the last four seasons.
Hopper: 17 career steals, 8 CS, Taveras had 68 while only getting caught 7 times last year.
Hopper:17 career XB hits, Taveras, 17 last year.
They may play the same style of defense and bat roughly the same, but Taveras' ability to steal bases and track record as a healthy ball player that you have some idea what he will do make him much more valuable than Hopper, who is coming off an arm injury that basically had him out all of last year. A weak armed OF coming off of an arm injury is not an ideal CF candidate.

This should open up the Juan Pierre Sweepstakes now that we have a winner for Willy Taveras

Posted by: MikeClarke | December 27, 2008 at 02:20 PM

Actually, I think this pretty much ends the Juan Pierre sweepstakes. This was the worst signing if you're a Dodgers fan. Who else is going to take Pierre off our hands? The Mets for Castillo? We resigned Blake ending that. The White Sox for Mike MacDougal? Maybe if the Dodgers kicked in half the difference between their salaries. In other words... Pierre remains a highly paid 4th OF for the Dodgers.

Taveras only played in 97 games in 07. Don't know if he was platooned that year or if he had some massive injury that took out a big chunk of his season.

So remove his two Colorado years, and you get something pretty close to his career line. I think thats about the best the Reds can hope for.

Which is a guy that can't steal first base, has no power and strikes out about 100 times a year.

He's one of the worst offensive players in the major leagues and would only be worth the money if he were hitting 8th or 9th and playing gold glove caliber defense in CF.

Hopper also isn't equal to Taveras.

Hopper is better. He doesn't strike out, and can take a walk. Also has no power to speak of and will steal less bases, but will be on far more often.

Its not Hopper's fault that the Reds were managed by the leagues worst manager last year who couldn't understand that Patterson was/is horrible.

The difference between Hopper/Taveras is rather simple. Taveras got a starting gig and turned that into people thinking that he was a starting CF, while Hopper never got the shot and people think he's a AAAA/bench player.

They have similar skills, Hopper however is the better offensive player because of his OBP and actually more power. Which isn't a compliment to Hopper. Taveras just stinks.

It is Hopper's fault that he got injured, and missed just about the whole year. Hopper doesn't even have a whole MLB season of ABs under his belt, so how can you evaluate him schellis? How can you say a guy with a flukey year in which he had a .367 babip is better? And more power? Hopper's minor league slg % over 9 full minor league seasons is .337. Taveras' over four full major league seasons? .337. If you're going to argue for Hopper, you can't use his very limited mlb stats, you have to go to his minor league stats.

This pisses me off, I wanted Willy on the White Sox, regardless of his sporadic numbers throughout his YOUNG career, the KID has speed, he's shown that he can hit for a decent average, it may not be silver slugger type but it manages well and he can flash some leather.

This is what I see in Willy IMO

Maybe it's me, but I think baseball greatly undervalues blazing speed nowadays. Of the two, Pierre is better because of his lifetime .300 batavg. He doesn't draw many walks but he's good for 180 hits a season and it's a very good chance that 50 or 60 of those slap hit/bunt singles will end up with him on 2nd or 3rd. How many guys can turn a single or bunt single into a double or triple. I think Pierre w/ a team like the Rays or Angeles where they know how to manufacture runs would be extremely valuable. As for Taveras if he can hit .270 and steal 60 bases and play league avg defense, then what more can you ask for? I guess the main problem with Pierre is his contract, but they can both be very good players.

Here's where baseball has gone wrong. Too many baseball players with tremendous, yet specfic, skill sets on teams where the manager has no idea on how to use them or how to put that player in a place to succeed. A guy like Pierre and too a lesser extent Taveras in years past would be lauded for their base stealing, bunt for hit, small ball type play. Is the knock on Pierre because of his contract size?

schellis,

I'd have to check the game logs, but if I recall correctly, the Rockies made their late season run largely without Taveras, who missed a lot of time with a bad hammy.

Ryan Spilborghs and Cory Sullivan played CF when Willy was hurt. Spilly doesn't have the defensive range or the speed, but he's an on-base machine. Sullivan's a mediocre on-base guy but that's better than Willy!

"Its not Hopper's fault that the Reds were managed by the leagues worst manager last year who couldn't understand that Patterson was/is horrible."

Just last year? Baker has more young pitcher's arm injuries chalked up to his credit than any manager that i can recall since the limiting of pitches began 25 years ago and he has a devastating record of ruined young pitching careers every where he goes to back him up. Shame he does not learn from only 1 or 2 mistakes, but has to keep the same foolishness going time after time.

Tavares may have been a guy Baker wants, at least he should not be able to ruin his legs from running too much with his low OBP..

Wow, I Like Baseball, I'm glad you're not running the White Sox. Didn't you get enough of the same with Jerry Owens? It's the same thing - speed, range on defense, no pop or OBP. As someone said earlier, you can't steal first. Baldelli, if he can get past his injury issues, is really intriguing - I think he's the kind of guy that's worth a flier for the Sox.

This absolutely sucks!!!!

Just like Toothpick did with Patterson last year, Taveras will play CF and bat lead off NO MATTER WHAT. It wont matter that Taveras is hitting below .200, Toothpick will be oblivious to it.

Also, just like Patterson, Toothpick will insist on Taveras going up to the plate and swinging at Pitches early in the count because, like Baker once explained, they are called hitters and not walkers.

Finally, since GASP is EASY to hit Home Runs in, watch as the season goes on as Taveras starts trying to hit more Fly Balls and hit some Home Runs instead of swinging down on the ball and trying to hit Ground Balls.

Also, from reports I have read, Taveras ISN'T that great of a Defensive player. Sure he has speed BUT he has bad judgement and runs bad routes to balls.

Even if Hopper is horrible, is Taveras really that much better then him? Isn't it close enough that there is a fairly decent chance that Hopper if given a full year could put up similar numbers.

Its not like Taveras is Jose Reyes or anything.

If the Reds are to get better then need to stop throwing millions at mediocre players and give the jobs to guys making the minimum. More times then not you'll find a cheap guy in your organization that can do the job just as well as someone that is right around the replacement player level.

I give the CF job to Dickerson/Hopper and don't look back. I'm more then willing to bet that some combination of the two will be superior to Taveras.

I don't think Taveras will suddenly try to become a power hitter. Its not like he's coming from Petco or Comerica. Colorado and Houston don't exactly have massive pitchers parks.

"WOW," Kswissreject, you can't compare Taveras to someone like Owens when first of all Owens has never stolen 68 bases before, and don't pull the "oh, well he can with his speed," cause it's not just about speed secondly Owens has never had a full season in the Bigs and pop? didn't the White Sox get enough pop with Konerko, Thome, Dye, Swisher(last year), healthy Crede not to mention Alexei and Quentin, the White Sox need someone that could steal them bases, when you say that Orlando Cabrera was your source of speed last year with a whopping 19 SB....you ain't doin' too well, if the sox were to get Taveras, it's a chance to take, a good one, caues for one he isn't gonna cost millions and two i don't know if you read or looked up his stats but he's capable of having a mid to upper .300 OBP


again
-- IMO!

I Like Baseball-

The word "capable" is an extreme look at his OBP last year, horrible.

Taveras has played four years and in only one of those four years (when he played the least amount of games and had his least amount of ABs) did he post anything close to a .350 average.

The only way Taveras would sniff a near .400 (upper .300) OBP would be if he were to hit around say .375-.380

There is also the fact that up till last year Taveras was near the break even point with his steals. Meaning that he was very close to the point with his sucess rate that it was actually hurting his club. I think this number is around 73%. If you percentage is lower then that you are actually hurting your club more then helping in the long run.

I don't think he could sustain the numbers that he had in his good year, which honestly still wasn't all that great.

He's not good unless he can hit .300 minimum.

Taveras is a speedy center-fielder with no pop, no OBP skills, and really isn't that great defensively. His speed just does not make up for the rest of his game. As a Nationals fan, I'm extremely happy that the Reds signed him before Bowden could. Although he did sign Corey Patterson to a minor league deal, so it's almost a wash.

I heard that Dusty just hired Nefi Perez and Lenny Harris as spring training advisers...LOL

I was referring to his previous seasons.....

and just because he had a bad season in the OBP department.... doesn't mean he's gonna be a bum. OBP is a struggle it seems like for most players


look at Swisher... he hit like what? .215 last year, after hitting .262 or something....you truly believe he's gonna hit .220 the rest of his YOUNG career?

I'm not sure why you're bringing Swisher into the conversation. To compare one bad season for his BA to what you perceive as one bad year of Taveras' OBP? Taveras was slightly below his career OBP last season, which does not indicate that it was a fluke at all. What was a fluke was 2007, where his BABIP was, I believe, around .370 (which is a completely unsustainable number-average is something like .270, I think). Generally, the ability to take a walk does not fluctuate like a player's ability to get a base hit.

So no, I don't believe Swisher is going to hit .220 for the rest of his career. But I do believe that Taveras is going to get on base around a .330 clip the rest of his career.

I'd pick the .350 mark... but for the Swisher part, you're right with the inability to get a base hit and not being able to draw a walk as good as someone else, such as Swisher.

The point I was trying to get to is that I really don't think Taveras is gonna be horrible, like people are saying he is or GOING to be
He's young and versatile (IMO)

Willy is 26 gonna be 27 soon, he's still young and he's still a good player to experiment with. He's cheap and he can hit for a good average, despite his .251 mark last season

he can give you 35+ stolen bases each year

Taveras stinks.

I would have preferred Steamin' Willie Beamen personally.

I look at this site frequently, but never read the posts until recently, but have any of you watched tavarez (or anyone else for that matter) play? It seems as though everyone commenting is just regurgitating other peoples, not very educated opinions. Look at preseason fantasy rankings and predictions of "experts" and see how accurate they are. I love the rangers and reds and watched volquez pitch as a ranger, but when the reds made that trade everyone had similar opinions to tavarez, because they never actually watch. If wily bunts well he'll be a huge improvement over the bums they ran out there last year. Maybe try watching and thinking more and talking less. It might not make you smarter, but you'll appear less dumb.

Thank you Ranger Red
...for NOT being ignorant

I agree with Ranger as well...
Do any of you people have a bit of optimism in you? The Reds needed a leadoff hitter badly, and Taveras was easily the best choice in the free agent market to fill that role. So what he had a bad year last year? Look at his career stats; every year except last his batting avg and OBP were at the very least good enough to fill the leadoff role. And you can't ignore those 68 bases he stole last year. Stop comparing the man to Corey Patterson... Patterson's career numbers are .253/.291... Taveras posts a .283/.331, including 07 when (yes, in limited playing time, I know) he hit .320/.367 on a World Series team. They're not even close in comparison!

You are correct that Patterson and Taveras is not a fair comparison.

People who say that are just bashing without thinking.

LOLOL HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

Clearly every person who thinks that Willy Taveras stinks lives in their mother's basement and has never actually watched a baseball game before. They just look at the numbers the player puts up and base their judgments on those, rather than watching the actual games, and then post their comments regarding those statistics on the interwebs... Anyway, 2 years, $6.25 million. Super!

You are correct that Patterson and Taveras is not a fair comparison.

People who say that are just bashing without thinking.

Posted by: studio179 | December 31, 2008 at 12:58 AM


Yeah... Corey Patterson hits home runs sometimes. Otherwise, they're the same player.

Taveras' best season was in COLORADO. Eventhough he hit .320, his OPS+ was still well below average. The worst part is he's under a manager who thinks speed is the only pre-requisite to be a leadoff man so you'll likely see Willy get 500-600 at bats next season.

Also, by giving him a two year contract, did they really just buy out his last year of arbitration? WHY?

2/$6.25MM?!?!?!

Wow...Reds fans, I'm sorry. Truly, truly sorry. Godspeed.

Signing a bad player for a 2 year contract for no good reason at all to play for Dusty Baker? That sounds familiar.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2217547

"Yeah... Corey Patterson hits home runs sometimes. Otherwise, they're the same player."

After reading my post, it does look like I am defending Taveras. I am not saying that Willy is great or nothing more than a 4th outfielder. Still better tahn Corey at this point in their career. Corey was dropped by Boras and had to sign a Minor League contract with the Nats with an invitation to Spring Training. I don't understand a two year deal for Willy. The difference between the two is not great enough to hold much.


"The worst part is he's under a manager who thinks speed is the only pre-requisite to be a leadoff man so you'll likely see Willy get 500-600 at bats next season."

You hit that right on...good old Dusty.

Anyone who's trying to justify this signing by reference to his 2007 numbers needs to look at the Willy Taveras BABIP chart. http://www.fangraphs.com/graphs.aspx?playerid=1876&position=OF&page=7&type=full

The only years he's notched a semi-respectable batting average or OBP have been premised on an unsustainably above average BABIP. And it's not true that speedsters invariably have above-average BABIPs, either (check Jose Reyes, Jimmy Rollins, Michael Bourn, and Juan Pierre if you doubt me).

I have little doubt Taveras is going to be better than 2008 Corey Patterson, but I think he might be an even worse signing in principle, since at least Patterson had more than one theoretical tool. If you've got Taveras' speed but have never notched 20 doubles in a season, you are an anemic hitter.

It might be moving Drew Stubbs too quickly, but I cannot believe he'd put up an OPS worse than Taveras' career .668, even if he was completely overwhelmed in the majors.

I'll agree that Taveras isn't a good leadoff man but I think he's a valuable centerfielder. Back when he was in Houston, he would make phenominal plays in center and could go 1st to home on a double with ease. I'm not sure if I'm recalling correctly, but I think he may have even done it on a walk-off single. Plus, he's stolen more than 30 bases in every real season he's played in.
If only he could learn to get on base he would be worth at least double that contract.

"I love the rangers and reds and watched volquez pitch as a ranger, but when the reds made that trade everyone had similar opinions to tavarez, because they never actually watch."

I don't know what the response was on here, because I wasn't on here, but I was a huge advocate for the Hamilton/Volquez swap. I think that it is a shame what they did to Wayne Krivsky...I would personally prefer have him in their than WJ. But on that line, I don't like the WT signing. WJ says that their number 1 priority is a power hitter, so we bring in WT...
We should have still had the power hitter in left, and CD in center. CD has average, Stolen Bases, OBP, SLG, and an above average glove anywhere in the OF...all for 400K
Give me CD in center with Hopper as a rover...that is the number 1 reason i am totally against this trade

Hey, Walt, maybe Omar Moreno is available too!

(I'm actually a Reds fan - a VERY frustrated one. This is the worst signing in baseball this offseason. Holy crap. Have we learned nothing in the last 25 years??)

The Reds were right to dump Krivsky. He'd made a few good moves in his tenure with the Reds, getting Brandon Phillips for Jeff Stevens, getting Arroyo for Wily Mo Pena/getting rid of Wily Mo Pena, and getting Jared Burton and Josh Hamilton in the Rule 5 draft. Thus far, the Hamilton trade has been pretty even, but I think Hamilton's a lot more likely to sustain his level of production than Volquez, who has control issues.

2006, he drained the Reds to get guys like Gary Majewski, Royce Clayton, Rheal Cormier, Eddie Guardado, and Todd Hollandsworth. The Reds still missed the playoffs. 2007, they were awful and dumped Jerry Narron (fine), replaced him with Dave Miley #2 in Pete Mackanin, and then hired the worst manager in baseball (the man who induces Corey Patterson/Willy Taveras signings and has a reputation for destroying pitchers) to replace him.

He re-signed Scott Hatteberg when everyone knew Votto was taking over last year, and ended up having to release him at midseason, he gave David Ross a long-term deal, signed Alex Gonzalez to a huge deal, gave Cordero too much money to be marginally better than David Weathers. Krivsky was awful with free agents and did the team a huge disservice with every signing.

That said, while I firmly believe Krivsky is nearly pure evil, Jocketty has been just about as lousy. Dunn for Owings might work out, since the Reds fans seem to hate Adam Dunn and he wouldn't have been brought back. Nick Masset may be decent in the bullpen (Richar is pretty useless), and I hate the Taveras signing and the Hernandez trade to put Ryan Hanigan back on the bench.

That's a pretty good contract for someone that has just been non-tendered -- this is a good low price pick up for the Reds and I still don't get why fans of baseball are complaining about Taveras can't you see that there aren't too many young ball players that can steal over 45 bases a year
it's not like his BA is horrible either, if he gets on base it'll be because of a base hit, for his .obp isn't too high, but it could get there
he's young

"and Taveras hit .250 in the NL West."

Ugh. People don't seem to understand what the NL West's weaknesses are. The only division that really rivaled the NL West for division-wide pitching last year was the NL Central, and even that is debatable.

"Taveras was slightly below his career OBP last season, which does not indicate that it was a fluke at all. What was a fluke was 2007, where his BABIP was, I believe, around .370 (which is a completely unsustainable number-average is something like .270, I think)."

Tell Albert Pujols or Tony Gwynn that a high BABIP is unsustainable. Not that Willy is that kind of hitter, but the point is made. Also, with speed like Taveras has, his BABIP will naturally be higher because he will beat out more balls than someone with average speed.

That said, his OBP last year was nowhere near his career OBP, even when you factor in last year's abysmal performance.

You really want to know a huge reason why Taveras wasn't as good last year? He bunted less than in 2007, despite playing more, and had less success. If Taveras, and Juan Pierre for that matter, would just bunt for hits more, they would have excellent OBPs.

Great move juust get rid of E.E. He SUCKS!!!!!!!!We now need atkins or dye and need pitching. Get Sheets or Penny.

who is "E.E" ???

the only thing i can put together from that is Edwin Encarnacion....?

The Reds were right to dump Krivsky. He'd made a few good moves in his tenure with the Reds, getting Brandon Phillips for Jeff Stevens, getting Arroyo for Wily Mo Pena/getting rid of Wily Mo Pena, and getting Jared Burton and Josh Hamilton in the Rule 5 draft. Thus far, the Hamilton trade has been pretty even, but I think Hamilton's a lot more likely to sustain his level of production than Volquez, who has control issues.

2006, he drained the Reds to get guys like Gary Majewski, Royce Clayton, Rheal Cormier, Eddie Guardado, and Todd Hollandsworth. The Reds still missed the playoffs. 2007, they were awful and dumped Jerry Narron (fine), replaced him with Dave Miley #2 in Pete Mackanin, and then hired the worst manager in baseball (the man who induces Corey Patterson/Willy Taveras signings and has a reputation for destroying pitchers) to replace him.

He re-signed Scott Hatteberg when everyone knew Votto was taking over last year, and ended up having to release him at midseason, he gave David Ross a long-term deal, signed Alex Gonzalez to a huge deal, gave Cordero too much money to be marginally better than David Weathers. Krivsky was awful with free agents and did the team a huge disservice with every signing.

That said, while I firmly believe Krivsky is nearly pure evil, Jocketty has been just about as lousy. Dunn for Owings might work out, since the Reds fans seem to hate Adam Dunn and he wouldn't have been brought back. Nick Masset may be decent in the bullpen (Richar is pretty useless), and I hate the Taveras signing and the Hernandez trade to put Ryan Hanigan back on the bench.


Posted by: TheStockholmSyndrome | December 31, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Majewski...Reds win this trade. he was worthless, but so were kearns, lopez, and wagner after being traded. reds got bray and darryl thompson out of the deal.

Dusty was the owners call, not WK. Also, CP and JHJ were in the same boat.

Coco Cordero- Reds went from the worst bullpen in the NL with Weathers as the closer to the 4th best in the NL with Coco as the closer. Good move.

To put it simply, when WK took over, the Reds were shameful with no hope of leaving the basement. In 2008, thanks largely to WK's move, the Reds came in with expectations. This season was more disappointing than usual because they were supposed to be competing for the playoffs.

I think the Taveras signing is a fine deal. The Reds get a solid lead off hitter with speed to burn and someone to play great defense in center. After all the name of the game is defense not hitting. Right now the Reds look real solid up the middle with Gonzalez Phillips and Taveras, the catching position is weak but they'll be alright. The Rays won last year with their defense and who's to say that the Reds can't do the same in '09

$3 million/year is BELOW league average, people. And for a guy like Willy Taveras, that is a bargain. I really wish people would quit saying that this is a HUGE deal or other bull crap like this. It doesn't logically make sense.

For someone to sit and say that Corey Patterson and WIlly Taveras are the same player, obviously hasn't looked at the back of a baseball card in ages, let alone watched a MLB baseball game. The statistics aren't even close in comparison. Willy Taveras is the better baseball player.

In 3 of the 4 baseball seasons he has played, he had posted a .291, .278, and .320 BA - had posted progressively BETTER OBP's of .325, .333, and .367.

It's called an "off-year". Players have them. Look at EVERY decent player in major league history, and you will find that a player has a bad year every now and then. It's the nature of the sport. There's not a SINGLE position player in baseball that was consistently SPECTACULAR every year since Ted Williams, and that's comparing stats from year to year for a particular player.

The Reds are a small-market team, so therefore we will get small-market players. Players that can be under team control for 3-5 years, and players that will sign 2-3 years contracts for 3-4 million a year. Sure, we'll have the occasional player like Arroyo or Harang making good money, but the majority of the players we get will be small-market players. That's UNTIL we can start to be a winning ball club. People need to get out of the mindset that we can go out and spend like West Coast teams, Boston, or New York, because it just isn't going to happen.

With that mindset, maybe we should've went out and got Juan Pierre, a VERY similar player to Willy Taveras, for 3x what Mr. Taveras is making. That would be the "smart" choice, right?

Reds fans never cease to amaze me. We sign a DECENT lead-off man (something of which we haven't had in a long, long time) and there's non-stop complaining about one year he was sub-par.

Stockholm,

Taveras is a speedy lead off hitter that hits a majority of singles (17 extra basehits last season). His slugging PCT is NOT going to be high, therefore his OPS will be low.

Stubbs is speedy, but he's not where near the speed of Taveras. It's not even close. Stubbs OBP was slightly better last year than Taveras's career OBP, which were highly inflated by Single-A and Double-A numbers. Stubbs performs at a minor league level, Taveras performs at a major league level. That's really all that needs to be said. Everyone thought Jay Bruce was the second coming of Hank Aaron, too. And what about Homer Bailey? Gotta quit setting expectations on minor leaguers too high. The good majority don't EVER pan-out.

I agree 100% with Rob Dicken, it's like you guys hold grudges against a YOUNG player for having a crappy year, which barely was a sh*tty year cause he did lead all of Major League in stolen bases, you can never have enough speed. It's like everyone acts as if he's 33 or 34 years old
he's JUST turning 27

this is why i wished that Ken Williams would had snagged him after he was stupidly non-tendered by the Rockies....he had to have not gotten along with someone in the front office cause you don't just let the major league leader in stolen bases go like that, especially at his age.

Oh for the record Rob Dicken, Ted Williams wasn't the last one to be consistently good

ahem* Henry Aaron =)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.