![]() |
|
|
| |
« Phillies Rumors: Moyer, Lowe, Burrell | Main | Red Sox Rumors: Sabathia, Youkilis, Tazawa »
Yesterday in the Rocky Mountain News, Tracy Ringolsby wondered if Twins outfielder Delmon Young would be a good fit for the Rockies. Today Joe Christensen of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune goes one step further, saying Rox GM Dan O'Dowd has been doing his homework on Young. Young, by the way, is not bothered by Ron Gardenhire's recent comments.
Christensen says that in general, the Rockies' demands of the Twins have been excessive. For example, La Velle E. Neal III suggested they wanted Kevin Slowey, Denard Span, and another prospect for Garrett Atkins. That asking price almost sounds too outlandish to be true.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053633c7ec970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rockies Doing Homework On Delmon Young:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The rox ask for way to much for their players thats why the get stuck with them when they dont want them
Posted by: americans1901 | December 05, 2008 at 09:43 AM
"La Velle E. Neal III suggested they wanted Kevin Slowey, Denard Span, and another prospect for Garrett Atkins."
Wh...what?
Posted by: soupdujour | December 05, 2008 at 09:51 AM
I'm guessing that "suggestion" was something he made up in his head.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 05, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Span/Slowey for Atkins is right around where I had priced it except I was more in the Young/Slowey or Young/Baker area with the addition of a prospect on the Twins side and the addition of Clint Barmes on the Rockies side.
Bottom line is Rox need pitching more then an OF so if they are going to deal Atkins they probably want pitching in return not another OF.
Rockies asking price should be high, they aren't desperate and they have plenty of depth elsewhere to still deal.
Atkins just isn't that expensive (especially considering what the Twins are might pay Casey Blake) and he could also slide to LF allowing Stewart to play 3B.
If I was the Rockies, I would try to deal Willy Taveras first and see where you stood after that. Until the, no cause for desperation
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 05, 2008 at 09:56 AM
That does seem excessive.
I'm not sure why the Rockies are trying to get Young. Sure, I do believe playing in Coors might be the spark he needs, but the Rockies have a logjam in the outfield if they in fact do keep Atkins. If they do move Atkins, they can use Young at left and Fowler/Gonzolez/Spilborghs at center.
Posted by: mkorpal | December 05, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Ya. That's about the most ridiculous trade scenario I've heard in recent years.
I wouldn't give up Span OR Slowey straight up for Atkins at this point, let alone both +.
Definitely ridiculous.
I think, if the Rockies would be open to it, a good trade for both sides would be something like:
Delmon/Swarzak
for
Street/Stewart/Baker
The Twins could use Stewart at 3b and Baker at 2b (Casilla to SS) and Street in the pen, and the Rockies would have their lineup set, plus probably a good young starter by midseason in Swarzak.
Posted by: djskilbr | December 05, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Colorado can go screw themselves if they're wanting that much for Atkins. Slowey is already on the coming of being a top 30 SP in this league, and Span is our lead off man for at least another 3-4 years. That's just terrible if the Twins did that. Just sign Casey Blake instead...although I'm not terribly excited for that either...but it's a lot better than this!
Posted by: wes37walz | December 05, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Eesh... what a joke.
Didn't the Rockies learn from getting burned by asking too much for Helton?
How's that contract looking now Colorado?
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 05, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Who were they getting back Tulo and Atkins lol. Any Colorado fans know anything about how Hector Gomez and Chris Nelson. My guess it would be a deal of Young for Atkins and a prospect.
Posted by: Twins GM | December 05, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Stewart is better than Delmon Young already at the plate, isn't a scumbag, and plays a more valuable position. Why would the Rox do that?
Posted by: ProgMatinee | December 05, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I agree thats far to much to even consider dealing for Atkins. If people think Delmon is bad in LF I can only imagine what they would think of Atkins at 3rd he just doesn't seem to fit what the Twins would be looking for, I'd rather sign Crede for 1 year or use Harris and Busher. I do think Stewart should be a target of the Twins if they are going to deal Delmon, but in no way shape or form is Street worth Delmon, you don't deal that kind of talent for a set-up man.
Posted by: MNRunLeft | December 05, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Span & Slowey for Atkins? Haha. I want nothing to do with Atkins, and certainly not that deal. Maybe Span & Slowey for Tulowitzki.
If we're trading for anything it should be a shortstop. Not wild about giving up on Delmon, especially considering even though he looked brutal last year, he's better than Cuddyer. I think if he is traded, it better be for a shortstop we're going to have for several years. Don't screw this up, Billy.
Posted by: zAck | December 05, 2008 at 10:09 AM
I wouldn't label Denard Span as the future leadoff man for the Twins just yet.
Remember 2004 when Lew Ford was our left fielder of the future after his "breakout" campaign?
Span's never shown anything in the minors until 2008, and while he had great numbers for the year between AAA and MLB, he's the one candidate I'd actually prefer to see the Twins sell high on, because I think he's going to come back down to Earth in a big way.
He can still be a nice player, but not like what we saw in 2008.
I don't think the Twins would never do it, so it's a moot point. Gardy has a crush on him and the media's built him up into some sort of Messiah image, more or less. Just stating my opinion.
Denard has to work to make me a believer in 2009. I hope he proves me wrong. :)
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 05, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Crede would fal apart playing on turf for a full season. Guillen rested Crede, when he was actually "healthy", when the Sox played at the dome.
Posted by: OmegaMan | December 05, 2008 at 10:11 AM
You're right that Atkins isn't that expensive. He also isn't that good. Over the past three years Atkins has hit .266/.337/.453 away from Coors. Those numbers look much worse if you don't include 2006. You seriously think a guy who hit .233/.278/.383 away from Coors last year is worth Span, Slowey AND another prospect? I'm sure they could prey a guy like Ty Wigginton away from the Astros for alot less than that, and they'd have a better player to boot.
Posted by: seanbergmanrules | December 05, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Didn't the Rockies learn from getting burned by asking too much for Helton?
How's that contract looking now Colorado?
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 05, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Atkins is signed at a reasonable price, so I have no clue how a Todd Helton comparison is used here. Helton has an awful contract, Atkins does not which is why they can hold onto him and then take in the 2 draft picks when he walks in 2 years.
The reality is the Rockies have no need to move anyone unless its for pitching and they have multiple other pieces that might be better trade chips to deal first.
You don't open negotiations for something you don't need (another OF) by starting at a fair price; you start by asking for way more and hope to end up somewhere slightly ahead of fair at the end.
Lets also remember that Atkins will be a Type A free agent in 2 years and thus yield any team who has him 2 Draft Picks, so his asking price is reflective of this.
Personally if I was the Rockies I would be trying to deal Brad Hawpe to the Cubs instead of Atkins to the Twins.
Cubs have stated their window is 2 years to win and Hawpe fits the bill perfectly for a Lefty Bat that plays RF.
Seth Smith could then play RF for the Rockies filling that hole and Carlos Gonzalez could play CF with Garret Atkins in LF and Ian Stewart at 3B.
In return for Hawpe, the Rox could probably get great value given the win now mode of the Cubs.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 05, 2008 at 10:23 AM
As an unaffiliated fan, I don't think I'd trade just Stewart for Delmon and Swarzak, let alone throw in a Street and Baker. Twins fans really need to get over this idea that Delmon Young still has a ton of value. Certainly he has some value, but its looking less and less likely that the guy will ever hit for power or post an impressive OBP. Seriously, the guys got 40 HRs in over 1900 ABs above the AA level. He's never really hit for power against advanced pitching.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 05, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Sounds like La Velle E. Neal III could post messages on here as a cubs fan.
What does this mean about the report about the Rockies not doing anythin with Atkins because he is their back up plan for Helton?
Posted by: basicslop | December 05, 2008 at 10:28 AM
djskilbr- Why would the Rockies trade their starting third baseman for the next 6 years? No. It's not like the Rockies have another 3B prospect in the pipelines.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 05, 2008 at 10:33 AM
From the looks of Christensen's latest article it looks like Delmon is working hard this offeseason getting into better physical condition "shedding pounds and adding muscle at the Peak Performance Project in Santa Barbara." I think Cuddy should be moved if an outfielder going to leave, but he's not little to no value.
Posted by: MNRunLeft | December 05, 2008 at 10:39 AM
What is unusual about this report is that the Rockies are NOTORIOUSLY "Christian" and try to avoid problem players. Not sure why they'd touch Young in the first place.
Posted by: ProgMatinee | December 05, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Giving Delmon Young for Garrett Atkins is a huge plus for the Rockies as well as the Twins. But, Garrett Atkins is not worth a starter plus an outfielder who both have really high potential. The guy can't hit away from Coors Field and is a below average fielder. The Twins have several top prospects in the system who could go with Young who are close to making it to the majors such as 3B Luke Hughes, RHP Kevin Mulvey, and CF Ben Revere. Young plus one of these players for Atkins is the right deal. I'm sorry but you don't give up one of your top pitchers plus a top outfielder for just one infielder who has some flaws.
Posted by: Dcaff | December 05, 2008 at 10:48 AM
''I'm sure they could prey a guy like Ty Wigginton away from the Astros for alot less than that, and they'd have a better player to boot.''
Agreed. Ty Wigginton to the Twins for one of the Twins starters (ala Blackburn/Perkins) going back to Houston seems like a good match to me. Houston gets a much-needed good young starter and Minnesota gets their third baseman that could play pretty much anywhere if injury strikes.
And by the way, that's a HAUL for Atkins. Has to be a really bad rumor and nothing more.
Posted by: MattyMets | December 05, 2008 at 10:49 AM
Atkins for Young, straight up.
Atkins fills the Twins void at third, and a regular spot in the outfield opens up for Span.
The Rockies go with an outfield of Young/Spilborghs/Gonzalez and buys some more time for Fowler in the minors to refine his game.
Stewart gets plugged in at third.
I think this is a win/win for both teams.
Posted by: RWS | December 05, 2008 at 10:51 AM
"From the looks of Christensen's latest article it looks like Delmon is working hard this offeseason getting into better physical condition 'shedding pounds and adding muscle at the Peak Performance Project in Santa Barbara.'"
Just next to that, it said that Delmon worked out there last year as well, only he made the drive from Camarillo, our mutual home town, everyday. My cousin went to high school with Delmon and I knew his father. Other than Dmitri, that family is actually big on being in shape.
Posted by: AA | December 05, 2008 at 10:53 AM
I believe they need to hold onto all their outfielders this year. I am not totally sold on Span if he can keep the numbers up. Young and Gomez will only be 23 at the start of the season and both still have upside. Cuddyer has some flexibility on positions he can play OF, 3B, and 1B. Also, cuddyer and young can fill in at DH when facing a lefty.
Posted by: bgigs52 | December 05, 2008 at 10:57 AM
Apparently Gardy got my memo that Delmon's upside is mythical and that he isn't that great of a ballplayer. He still deserves to be a MLB starter, but he has mythical upside.
Law mentioned in a chat somewhere that Jason Donald is about all the Phillies should give up to get Delmon. I'm fine with that. SS/2B is major org weakness for the Twins. And he profiles as at least an average starting MI.
Posted by: kab21 | December 05, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Nowhere does it say he made the commuter everyday, which leads me to believe he moved closer so he could focus on working out. "Asked how much better shape he's in now than September, he said, "way better," adding, "I've got things to fix with baseball and with my body."
Posted by: MNRunLeft | December 05, 2008 at 10:58 AM
dmitri is big on being in shape. a big round shape.....
Posted by: roguesaw | December 05, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Jeez that trade proposal sounds a lot like one a homer fan would make up.
Garrett Atkins is a fine player, but the guy just isn't that good. He's not a good defensive 3B, he's just adequate, and will likely need to move to the OF in a couple years. His numbers are really helped by playing in Coors, so when it comes down to it Atkins is really not a very impressive player.
Atkins might not even be worth either of those guys by themselves.
Span posted a .387 OBP in near 400 plate appearences while playing for a contending team. He's only 24 and still has nearly all of his team controlled years left. Right now Span is a capable CF who is a plus on the corners that can get on base, and shows flashes of good speed and power. His ceiling isn't terribly high but he may already be a good player.
Slowey meanwhile, was great for them last season. He's still quite young and his peripherals were great last season, his command seems to be very good. Slowey may very well already be a solid 3, and he's definitely a good 4/5 option.
I'm sorry but that prosposal is simply laughable.
I don't expect the Rockies to move Atkins unless they can land a good young OF. Otherwise they'll probably play Stewart at third, Helton at first, Atkins in left and C-Gon and Spilborghs in center.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Thank you MorneauVP - they should be selling high on Span, as well as Blackburn and Perkins instead of buying high on Blake or selling low on Young. All three are replaceable.
They should move on Wigginton - he's a better, younger fit than Blake.
Posted by: jhawk90 | December 05, 2008 at 11:22 AM
I like the Wigginton tithe Twins idea, and Houston really needs some youth.
Could a Wigginton for one of Perkins, Blackburn, Mulvey or Swarzak work? Maybe with Houston throwing in a prospect?
Posted by: scribbletone | December 05, 2008 at 11:41 AM
I know it doesn't count for a whole lot most of the time, but I might want to keep Ian Stewart if I was going to trade for Delmon Young. I rememeber reading a Baseball America article (back in '04 I think) about how they are really good friends and hoped to play together some day.
Maybe having both together would make Delmon more comfortable and would help him realize a little more of that upside sooner?
at the least, you'd get a few feel good stories in the local press instead of it just being "clubhouse cancer" or something.
Posted by: wihargo | December 05, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Could a Wigginton for one of Perkins, Blackburn, Mulvey or Swarzak work? Maybe with Houston throwing in a prospect?
Posted by: scribbletone
You would have to think with a farm system like Hustons that throwing in a prospect along with any trade really wouldn't be a big deal.
Its sort of like asking for an extra magic bean after you've given the man your cow.
Posted by: BaseBallz | December 05, 2008 at 12:27 PM
The Rockies should do the following in this situation: trade Garrett Atkins and Clint Barmes (or a middle infield prospect that is NOT Chris Nelson...whichever the Twins prefer) straight up for Delmon Young.
The Rockies then have an outfield containing Ryan Spilborghs in left, Carlos Gonzalez in center, and Delmon Young in right (with Willy Taveras and Jeff Baker coming in off the bench). Then, they should proceed to insert Ian Steward at third and move Brad Hawpe back to his natural position of 1B (he's a butcher in the outfield). Have Todd Helton come in off the bench in pinch hit situations (I know they don't want to spend 16M a year on a pinch hitter, but keeping him in the lineup everyday hurts the team).
What do you guys think?
Posted by: theoldgrizzlybear | December 05, 2008 at 12:51 PM
The Rockies can and should not acquire another outfielder. All they need, really, is pitching -- meaning, they need an ace. Jeff Francis, Ubaldo Jimenez, and Aaron Cook are the only legitimate starters that club has. There is no ace. It also doesn't help that Franklin Morales has yet to prove his worth and show the consistency and maturity needed to excel in the bigs. And while Slowey is very talented, he is young and I'm not confident he can lead a rotation so early in his career.
This rumor is all kinds of atrocious. Delmon Young's value is dropping rapidly. Come on, Gardenhire and others within the Twins organization would rather start Denard Span -- a flash in the pan with no MiLB track record -- over Delmon Young? What a dramatic drop-off. There is no chance that he is worth something like Garrett Atkins and ______. Besides, Atkins doesn't project as a third basemen in the next three years, so the Twins would have to find yet another option after he's shoved into the already crowded outfield.
There are many words with which I can characterize this one, but I'll just leave it at "Blech." This simply cannot be true.
Posted by: Ruck859 | December 05, 2008 at 01:13 PM
I think Helton's fielding puts him back in the starting lineup to start the year. Hope he plays at .320/15hr/80 RBI pace like in 07. Though its not what he's paid at, its still nice. If he gets injured or otherwise has a dramatic drop off, either play Baker or Koshansky at 1st. Moving Hawpe is a bad idea. He's still got a cannon arm. Lets not forget that only 2 years ago this was the best fielding team in history. Concluding that Hawpe (or Atkins for that matter) are scubs in the field is offbase.
Posted by: ProgMatinee | December 05, 2008 at 01:19 PM
ProgMatinee:
While I agree with what you said about Helton (good for the lineup if he hits like he did in '07), Hawpe's cannon arm does not justify the horrible routes he takes to flyballs and his overall lack of ability to properly judge them. And, while the Rockies defense WAS solid overall in 2007, errors are not a good way to measure how good a player is defensively. That sums up Atkins well, as other third basemen may make more errors, but they also cover a lot more ground than Atkins, who is extremely range-deficient.
Posted by: theoldgrizzlybear | December 05, 2008 at 01:41 PM
''Have Todd Helton come in off the bench in pinch hit situations (I know they don't want to spend 16M a year on a pinch hitter, but keeping him in the lineup everyday hurts the team).''
Hmmm.. Helton was banged up pretty bad last year and still managed a .397 OBP in under 300 at-bats. He has 8 out of 10 seasons of .320 or better and he has a lifetime .428 OBP. Even at 35, you really think this guy would hurt your team instead of help it if he is healthy?
While I do agree that they have to take it easy with him in terms of playing time with so many other options available to them if he isn't healthy, Helton still contributes even though his power has diminished greatly. Don't sell him short like that.
Posted by: MattyMets | December 05, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Young for Ian Stewart seems really fair.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 05, 2008 at 06:44 PM
For you, maybe.
Posted by: theoldgrizzlybear | December 06, 2008 at 09:08 AM
1st of all Garrett is pretty valuble to any team not just the Rockies. 1st base is his natural postion, but he was moved to 3rd because of Helton, he has played 2nd base also, so he can play there if needed and he also knows the outfield. The Rockies needs are Pitchers not OF there is a log jam at all 3 postions. Stewart is not going to go any where or if he does the price will be higher than want the twins can afford, because of his high upside. If the twins want to trade a player that has never lived up to his potential(young) take Barmes or Baker and Willy T from the Rockies.
Posted by: srials | December 06, 2008 at 09:05 PM