![]() |
|
|
| |
« Perrotto's Latest: Zambrano, Wolf, Anderson | Main | Baldelli A Fit For Red Sox? »
3:05pm: As expected, Dayton Moore shot this down.
1:38pm: ESPN's Steve Phillips says there's nothing to this rumor.
9:01am: From: Tony Massarotti of the Boston Globe:
According to one National League executive, the Kansas City Royals and Atlanta Braves have had serious discussions about a trade that would send outfielder Jeff Francouer to the Royals for pitcher Zack Greinke. The same source said he believed the teams were close to executing the deal, but that Atlanta was holding up any and all trade discussions until the Braves had a resolution of their pursuit of right-hander A.J. Burnett.
I'd be surprised to see this happen without the Braves adding significant pitching to their offer for Greinke. But in general I am skeptical that anything like this is close, even given the Burnett contingency. We probably would've heard some rumbling from Dave O'Brien, Mark Bowman, Bob Dutton, or Dick Kaegel.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364ae079970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Francoeur-Greinke Rumor Shot Down:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
1. RBIs and RISP average don’t matter? Wow.
2. “Not an important stat as it relies on team performance more than personal performance”. Gee, I’d rather have something that ties in with team performance. Call me crazy.
3. Not at all in love with Francouer. I think he’s a good young player who’s getting a lot of crap for one bad year. One bad year in which he still had 33 doubles and 71 RBI. And 14 assists.
4. How is 73 HRs and 324 RBIs, with 59 OF assists vs. 23 errors in 3 ½ season by age 24 crap? Oh, right. Those things don’t matter. I just don’t get it. Sure, he hasn’t lived up to the hype, but how many do?
5. Francouer, again, is by no means elite. But he's certainly not horrible.
Look, Greinke is very good. You're using one bad year to enhance your argument that Francouer is no good. Greinke had 76 ERA+ in 2005 and a WHIP of 1.56. Is that fair?
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 10:15 AM
IFiredScottBoras,
haha. First off this trade of Francoeur for Greinke is pure speculation and BAD speculation at that. Secondly the Yanks are likely going to outbid the Braves for Burnett. Braves fans need to calm down and think logically as to why would the Royals ever do this deal. Are they searching for outfielders with sub .300 OBP?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 10:16 AM
"Dayton Moore is a great GM he'll find a way to fleece the Braves if he wants too"
Except that he learned from the master, John Schuerholz, president of the Braves. And Frank Wren learned from the same man.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | December 09, 2008 at 10:16 AM
"WOW the guy has not finished outside the top 3 rightfielders in assists since he came in the league. He also has more assists than any other major league outfielder since 2005 and thats fact not guessing."
Because assists is the only important stat defensively, am I right? Alfonso Soriano is right up there every year leading in assists as well, he's just rockin the glove. I can't believe he didn't win a GG this year!
He has a bad RF, a bad ZF and there were 14 RFs rated higher on defense alone in 2008. And THAT is a fact.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I have seen some wild rumors coming from the Boston Globe but this is ludicrous. KC has a glut of OFs and is trying to dump Jose Guillen who is the exact same player as Francoeur albeit older and more expensive. Scouts consider Greinke one of the top young pitchers in baseball and KC could get a serious package from almost any team in baseball if they were serious about moving him.
More trusted sources I have read always say the same thing......teams call KC regarding Greinke but are always put-off by the high asking price of 3 major-league ready players. Also doesn't help that KC is loaded at OF/1B/DH which means they'd look for SP & IF.
Posted by: Fish25 | December 09, 2008 at 10:18 AM
HAHAHAHAHA YA right... ill throw everything i own in the river if dayton did that.. he already stated that it would take a boat load of guys to get greinke, not for some pos that has never reached his potential and cant take a walk...
im actually a little surprised that you decided to post this on here tim. its complete and utter BS from some dumb$hit boston guy
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Unless the Braves agree to include Hanson or Heyward I can't see anyway this rumor makes sense. Sounds bogus to me.
Posted by: DeJay | December 09, 2008 at 10:18 AM
"11 is decent?"
You're taking that quote out of context. I was talking about 2006-2007. 48 HRs over 2 years is, in fact, decent.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 10:19 AM
DOB just said the following on his blog:
"Francoeur for Greinke rumor, huh? No way. Not straight-up. Dayton Moore likes Francoeur, but no way. If he did that deal … no way.
I’ll ask, but would be absolutely stunned if Royals did that without getting at least a top Braves prospect in addition to the RF. And I mean a top prospect."
We will probably find out pretty soon whether there is anything to this or not.
Posted by: Thundersticks | December 09, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Greinke may very well cost more than Peavy, even though the Padres seem desperate to trade Peavy. Greinke is only now arb-eligible, and won't hit the open market for three years. Peavy IS locked up through 2013, but at salaries of 8, 15, 16, 17, and 22 per year. Over the next three years, Greinke should be at least 20M cheaper than Peavy. That alons could make Greinke more expensive to acquire. The Braves are sure doing a great job to remodel their rotation.
Posted by: scottiedawg | December 09, 2008 at 10:20 AM
John Schuerholz should have never left the Royals that was the Royals biggest downfall but with Dayton at the helm they will be back. Dayton actually grew up a Royals fan and I'm sure he wants to make the Royals great again just like under Schuerholz. Its kinda funny since he left how have the Braves faired?
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Yeah, when Miguel Olivo is one of your better hitters, you might consider a deal like this. We all know that more prospects would be involved. A deal like this happening isn't too hard to believe. Royals want a few guys who can play everyday for a guy who pitches every 5 days. Sometimes the team with the need to sell tickets, will lose in a deal for someone who plays everyday.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:22 AM
not to mention scottiedawg
greinke has prooved in the american leauge.
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:22 AM
"Yeah, when Miguel Olivo is one of your better hitters, you might consider a deal like this."
David Dejesus?, Billy Butler, Alex Gordon, Mike Aviles, Mike Jacobs, and etc..
they are all worse than olivo... your a moron
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:24 AM
getting Greinke is about getting Peavy. If the Braves get him without giving up much (Francoeur) than they can turn around and make him the centerpiece in a deal for Peavy.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | December 09, 2008 at 10:25 AM
"your a moron"
Oxymoron?
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Hows is Miguel Olivo one of the Royals better hitters? Last time I checked the Royals finished better than the Braves.
I guess you forgot the Royals had Mike Aviles, David Dejesus, Alex Gordon, CoCo Crisp, Mike Jacobs, Jose Guillen, Billy Butler all way better hitters than Olivo
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Wow like 2 guys out of a group of 5 who are better. Um Alex Gordon is a bust.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:26 AM
PLEASE GIVE ME A NEW UPDATE SO I DONT KEEP CHECKING THIS STORY COMPULSIVELY. This would be worse than Dye-Neifi.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:27 AM
"1. RBIs and RISP average don’t matter? Wow.
2. “Not an important stat as it relies on team performance more than personal performance”. Gee, I’d rather have something that ties in with team performance. Call me crazy.
3. Not at all in love with Francouer. I think he’s a good young player who’s getting a lot of crap for one bad year. One bad year in which he still had 33 doubles and 71 RBI. And 14 assists.
4. How is 73 HRs and 324 RBIs, with 59 OF assists vs. 23 errors in 3 ½ season by age 24 crap? Oh, right. Those things don’t matter. I just don’t get it. Sure, he hasn’t lived up to the hype, but how many do?
5. Francouer, again, is by no means elite. But he's certainly not horrible.
Look, Greinke is very good. You're using one bad year to enhance your argument that Francouer is no good. Greinke had 76 ERA+ in 2005 and a WHIP of 1.56. Is that fair?"
Daslied, im going to only type this to you one time, because if you don't comprehend where Im coming from then you just dont view these stats the way I do. You can look at stats any way you want, but it's not a traditional way most serious baseball fans or FOs would grade a player.
1. RBIs depend a great deal on placement in the lineup. You can take an average hitter and put him in the 5 hole, and if the front of the line up gets on base he gets RBIs. Yes, it's good to be a team player, but we're grading an individual here, and RBIs are not a reflection of someones skill.
2. Francoeur has has more than 1 bad year, he's had 2 very bad years and 1 average year as a full time player. Greinke has had one bad year, I already stated that, but he's had three season with #1 type of numbers. Franceour has never seen anything like that.
3. You're using stats picking and choosing to try and make your point. The fact is he's a bad defender. This is proven by his Range Factor and his Zone Factor. He has a phenominal arm, hence the number of assists. Like I said before, Soriano is in the same boat (but Francoeur isn't near that bad in range).
4. Francoeur is not horrible, but at this point he's been below average in his career. He had one great half year, and people fell in love with him. He has done nothing to show that he can replicate those numbers again. Yes, he's 24, but he isn't progressing. His OBP and OPS+ continue to fall and he's just not getting it so far. Can this change? Of course, but right now it doesnt look like it.
Greinke on the other hand has improved each year, posting incredible numbers for such a young age.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 10:27 AM
IFiredScottBoras, you're probably the dumbest individual I've come across here.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:28 AM
None of those guys are substantially more valuable than Olivo. Sure he is garbage, but so are the majority of their hitters.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:29 AM
No way. At best this is a test balloon thrown out by both the Braves and Royals to put some pressure on Burnett and to see what kind of market is out there for Grienke.
Posted by: basicslop | December 09, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Speculation is great but...
We don't have any idea all the players in such a trade, I do believe that since the Braves are waiting for Burnett,it would involve either Escobar or key pitching.
Cobra
Posted by: Cobra09 | December 09, 2008 at 10:30 AM
"Wow like 2 guys out of a group of 5 who are better. Um Alex Gordon is a bust"
Why do you even both to pretend to know baseball.. your a tool. you know nothing..
Alex Gordon is a bust ok.. 2 years in the MLB... lets label some other busts.. Francoeur, Zimmerman, Justin Upton, Troy Tulo, this is all according to you
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Jreezy, you're an idiot.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Nearly every player in the lineup is a better hitter than Miguel Olivo.
You continue to dig yourself a hole here.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:32 AM
IFiredScottBoras, he makes a great point...
one more thing
Royals 75-87 in the AL
Braves 72-90 in the NL
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:32 AM
I think the best thing to do is probably to ignore him.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:33 AM
I could see this being an expanded deal:
Greinke and Guillen for Francoeur, Reyes, and Gorkys Hernandez?
The Braves get Greinke and Guillen gives them a power bat that can replace Frenchy.
The Royals dump Guillen's contract, land Francoeur, and get a desperately needed athletic CF prospect.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 09, 2008 at 10:33 AM
No, dude, Alex Gordon barely hit over .250 both of his years in the pros. Tulowitski was hurt, Justin Upton is probably a bust, Zimmerman was hurt, Francoeur is a bust. Sorry I'm titled to an opinion. We must be in Communist Russia. Oh okay.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:33 AM
ya thats what im going to do now.. it amazes how dumb a human being can possibly be.. its truly sad
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:34 AM
"Jreezy, you're an idiot."
Classy. How about some actual analysis rather than name-calling? I'd like to hear how Olivo is a better hitter than Billy Butler...or Mike Aviles...or...
Posted by: vtadave | December 09, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Bdlugz, I appreciate you being not completely condescending this time. :) That's said in a light tone, by the way.
No, I don't know stats like you. I know stats like the ones on the cards I bought when I was 8. I've watched the Braves since 1982, when I played little league. I believe I can tell when someone's crap. Francouer is not crap. Greinke is more valuable right now.
I'm not saying a swap would be fair. It certainly wouldn't. I don't agree that Greinke has had #1 numbers for three years. I don't agree that Francouer has had 2 very bad years. And please don't call me out for "using stats picking and choosing to try and make" my point. What exactly are you doing?
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 10:35 AM
scribbletone... that is a horrible deal for the royals.. i know your a braves fan but honestly, you couldnt think of a more fair deal.
if the royals get rid of greinke to the braves the will get one of your top 3 prospects
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:36 AM
IFiredScottBoras --
Have you ever heard of On-Base Percentage? It's pretty neat.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:36 AM
I thought Braves fans knew baseball, because if that were the case, you would know how good Greinke is. I could understand if you haven't been paying attention to baseball in Kansas City, as most people haven't, but don't start saying who your GM isn't going to trade, when they are still prospects and Greinke would be your ace. Probably better than Burnett. Greinke in the NL = Cy Young potential. So you're going to give us an OF who you don't even want for a #1 or 2 starting pitcher. Get your heads out of your....This isn't happening without raiding your farm system.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Yeah, well the Braves dominated in the 90s if I recall, so who is the more storied franchise? Where were the Royals in the 90s? I don't recall. I was being sarcastic about Olivo anyways. Two of the guys you named, they acquired this off season.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:37 AM
He was name calling me.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:38 AM
"OBP is not the be-all end-all of player evaluation."
No, but barely anything you stated means anything. Offensively you can view OBP as one of the more important stats to scoring runs. He is horrible...so should have no value. You can hit .300 all you want like Juan Pierre, but if your OBP is only .320 then your not very good at helping your team win games.
Posted by: Trizza | December 09, 2008 at 10:38 AM
"WOW the guy has not finished outside the top 3 rightfielders in assists since he came in the league. He also has more assists than any other major league outfielder since 2005 and thats fact not guessing."
Assists is not a very reliable defensive statistic. A lot of it just suggests he has a good arm. By more reliable fielding numbers he has been fairly poor.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 10:39 AM
this is a rumor that began during last winter, and keeps resurfacing as people talk about things in the lobby (i.e. Cano to the Dodgers, Jack Wilson to the Pirates - another eight-month-old rumot) - for one, I see any greinke deal bringing back talent just less than whatever it takes to land Peavy. 3 young players (inc. either Escobar or Kelly Johnson) and a ML pitcher like a JoJo, etc... minimum
Posted by: dp1974 | December 09, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Ifiredscottboaras, who cares about the 90's ??? its 2008 almost 2009. explain to me what the 90's means right now for the braves? or the royals ?
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Dierkes, please tell me this report is garbage.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Yeah Gordon's OPS was a stunning .314 and .349 respectively in 07 and 08. Ever heard of sub-par?
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:40 AM
I have a better idea --
Braves get Tony Pena Jr., Ross Gload
Royals get Jair Jurrjens
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:42 AM
The 90s established that the Braves have a great farm system which will often result in overrating players from that certain organization for years after that.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:42 AM
.351 last year, actually. Interestingly enough, .351 is nearly 15 points above average.
Maybe you were talking about "sub-par" in the golf sense?
Please advise.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Jreezy, how dare you call me dumb after spewing that garbage trade out of your mouth. hahaha Tony Pena and Ross Gload. You have to be kidding.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:44 AM
Wow. Does anybody hear the sound of something flying over someone's head?
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Uhh I'm a Cub fan.
I guess I was overvaluing dumping the 2/24 on Guillen's contract. I guess make the package going to KC something like Francoeur, Schafer, Reyes and Locke.
I'm sorry but I don't think it makes any sense for Hanson or Heyward to be moved.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 09, 2008 at 10:46 AM
Oh Wikipedia must be lying then. Nearly "above-average" for a guy who was supposed to be a "5 tool player". So he is an average hitter. Wow. What a waste of the 2nd pick in 05.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:47 AM
I'm just glad to see the Braves talking to someone.
Don't believe Braves will get Burnett unless they offer him 5 years guarenteed at about 8M
Cobra
Posted by: Cobra09 | December 09, 2008 at 10:50 AM
scribbletone.. i agree it doesnt make sense... thats why greinke to the braves will never happen. and im fine with that
IFiredScottBoras, do you give people chances ?? or you expect everyone to just be ryan braun and hit as soon as they get to the bigs.. do you understand that most people from Gordons draft class like braun had an extra year in the minors. triple A to be exact.. gordon went straight from double A to the bigs..
give him time..
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Excuse me meant to say 80M for 5 years.
Posted by: Cobra09 | December 09, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Hey, I have a crazy idea -- I will take a claim that you never made and disprove it!
I'll have to check the record, but I'm not sure I was ever making Gordon out to be a great player yet. He just finished his second year after being rushed to the majors. I think I'll be a little more patient with a guy with a 110 OPS+ last year who will be only 25 in the spring.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 10:52 AM
If it doesn't make any sense to move Hanson or Heyward than have them come up and play this year. Why would we give up Greinke for Francouer? Give me one good reason that helps the Royals. By the way Heyward looks just like Dye.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 10:53 AM
How is Alex Gordon a bust when he hit .261 16 homers 59 rbi's and a .351 obp and missed around 30 games...If he would have played all 162 he would have been at .260 20 homers 80 rbi's and .350 obp.
Gordon will be a great player before its all said and done
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Greinke/Guillen for something like Francoeur/Morton/Reyes makes better sense.
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | December 09, 2008 at 10:56 AM
We'll see. I hope so. I thought he was going to be great.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:58 AM
"You can hit .300 all you want like Juan Pierre, but if your OBP is only .320 then your not very good at helping your team win games."
So, over 500 PAs, 150 hits and 10 walks (.300 AVG, .320 OBP) is horrible, while 150 hits and 30 walks (.300 AVG, .360 OBP) is great? One more walk every 8 games is the difference?
I agree that OBP is an important stat. But does it really define complete value? That seems to be what some people are saying.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Bravenewworld... jesus.. im outta here. you braves fans are so dumb.. thats the worse deal ever
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Cody, because apparently Francouer is a bust for hitting .293 with 19 HRs, 103 RBIs and a .338 OBP at the same age.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 11:02 AM
I think Francoer will be a good player but you put Gordon in atlanta against nl pitching and a hitters ballpark like that and his numbers would be off the charts. The thing about Gordon he's still improving at the major league level if he was regressing I would be worried
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Guillen and Greinke for Escobar, Francouer, Hanson, and Schafer/Hernandez.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Personally I think Francouer a change of scenary would do him good. Just like Mark Teahen
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 11:08 AM
daslied -- Francoeur was a league average player that year. 103 OPS+.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Yes Grover, that is the best trade scenario possible. Let's get that deal done!!
(puke)
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | December 09, 2008 at 11:11 AM
I don't like that Dayton's affinity for ATL players is clouding his judgment. You want your GM to be cold, calculating, rational -- not easily swayed by his loyalty to Atlanta.
Posted by: jreezy1986 | December 09, 2008 at 11:13 AM
The Braves and Rangers are going to be the strongest suitors for Greinke and have the players to get it done. If Francoeur is one of the players received in return Guillen would almost certainly be involved (which is a bonus for KC and the Braves' advantage over Texas packed system if their competing for Greinke). The amount of contract eaten by KC would determine the rest of the return. IT's been rumored that KC wants 3 major league ready players and two prospects for Grienke and Guillen gives additional value.
In that scenario I think Braves would have to part with Heyward or Hanson as the top prospect in the trade and then Teheran/Rohrbough or Hernandez/Schafer depending on the top two.
Greinke
Guillen
for
Escobar
Francoeur
Morton/Soriano
Heyward/Hanson
Schafer/Hernandez or Teheran/Rohrbough
End it with an excerpt from a Bill James interview by Fire Brand on MVN the link is at the bottom.
"You've said that Bret Saberhagen is the closest you've come to seeing a pitcher achieve perfection. Which active pitcher would you say comes the closest?
Another Royal. . .Zack Greinke. At the end of the season he had that same look that Saberhagen did in the 1980s and Catfish Hunter did in the 1970s--that he was doing effortlessly the things that everybody else struggles to do."
http://firebrandal.com/2008/12/08/fire-brand-interviews-bill-james.html
Posted by: Billy Heywood | December 09, 2008 at 11:14 AM
DOB's isnt buying it...
"Francoeur for Greinke rumor, huh? No way. Not straight-up. Dayton Moore likes Francoeur, but no way. If he did that deal … no way.
I’ll ask, but would be absolutely stunned if Royals did that without getting at least a top Braves prospect in addition to the RF. And I mean a top prospect."
can we put this one to rest now
Posted by: csg | December 09, 2008 at 11:20 AM
With the Bravos either posturing or being truthful that they're not gonna move Escobar, I actually think Kelly Johnson would be a better fit with KC. Aviles' much-maligned defense proved to be a falsehood (he was actually the #4 SS in MLB last year defensively - thanks, Bill James), so maybe with Hanson, a CF prospect and Francouer...
Posted by: dp1974 | December 09, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Braves will not part with Heyward or Hanson and will certainly not do a 5 for 2 player deal. When you look at Greinke's record and you look and an aging Guillen...they are not worth that much.
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | December 09, 2008 at 11:20 AM
BraveNewWorld, you are unrealistic, if you value your prospects so much quit wasting your time on this website and email your GM to call them up this season. Greinke is a stud and has proven it at the MLB level. The other guys, not so much. Unless DM is overwhelmed, don't trade Greinke.
Oh yeah, don't forget to clean up that puke before you leave.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 11:21 AM
A stud with a losing record and you want Escobar and both of our top prospects? If we weren't willing to offer these guys for a Cy Young winner in Peavy, what makes you think Wren is going to pull the trigger on a 34-45 record??
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | December 09, 2008 at 11:26 AM
This trade would be the stupidest stupid thing in the history of stupidest stupid things.
Posted by: tomb | December 09, 2008 at 11:31 AM
Thank you for proving how out of touch you are.
Fine, we'll keep him. According to milb.com, your top 2 prospects are Heyward and Hanson. I don't think we need Heyward. Regardless, go play fantasy GM, no way DM gives Greinke up for the garbage you braves fans are throwing out there.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I think this trade will remind Mets fans of the Kazmir-Wilson steal a few years back. Francoeur does not have what it takes to match Grienke in terms of tradability. If Dayton Moore makes this trade straight up, well, I feel sorry for Royals fans to have someone with that kind of imcompetance in the front office.
Posted by: sjdurfey | December 09, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Teahen for Frenchy is fair. Can we please stop pretending that Grienke for Frency is fair.
Has anyone spent the time to look at the Royals roster and see: Guillen, DDJ, CRisp, Teahen, Maier and Gathright as OF? We do NOT need another OF.
Top that with a rotation of Grienke, Meche, Davies, Bannister, Hoch. We DO need another SP.
This is stupid.
Posted by: basicslop | December 09, 2008 at 11:59 AM
cx, sjdurfey, kazmir went for victor zambrano.
Posted by: dp1974 | December 09, 2008 at 12:10 PM
thats right. i was thinking wilson alvarez for some reason. either way, the trade was just awful.
Posted by: sjdurfey | December 09, 2008 at 12:21 PM
"daslied -- Francoeur was a league average player that year. 103 OPS+."
Right - so league average at 23 is certainly not a bust, which is what some people are calling him.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 12:30 PM
I wonder if Royals fans realise that their suggestions are just as ridiculous as the Braves ones.
Honestly? For 2 years of Greinke we are expected to take on Guillen's horrible salary, give up 4 years of a cheap, good SS, give up 6 years of a decent #4/5 starter, 6 years of one of the best prospects in baseball and 6 years of a good CF prospect?
For 3 or 4 years of Greinke that's overpaying, for two it's shockingly so.
For the record, Callis thought that Greinke would come cheaper than Peavy.
Posted by: NickC | December 09, 2008 at 12:38 PM
DM is not going to trade Greinke to his old team unless he comes away looking like he stole the deal. It isn't going to happen. Braves fans ought to just shell out the dough for Burnett and wait for Hanson to make it up. Hopefully the Royals can get Greinke signed to an extension. If he can't get Greinke signed to an extension by the trade deadline this year, maybe he will move him, and he'll still get a pretty nice return. With all the questins in the Royals rotation, Greinke isn't going anywhere. These rumors must be to serve another purpose.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 01:05 PM
There is nothing to Steve Philips...he was the reason the Braves were able to keep the streak going towards the end...he is just plain stupid anyways....
Posted by: bartendermlb | December 09, 2008 at 01:40 PM
Woah Surprise Surprise everybody knew this except for dumb braves fans
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Oh we all knew it wouldn't happen...
Posted by: bartendermlb | December 09, 2008 at 01:44 PM
People still judge pitchers on W-L records? Do you also believe in the Easter Bunny?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 01:45 PM
Steve Phillips:
• There's nothing to a Jeff Francoeur-for-Zack Greinke swap between the Braves and Royals.
Posted by: dp1974 | December 09, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Uh oh. Steve Phillips says there's no chance????
So you're saying there's a chance?
Actually I think Steve Phillips does a great job. Underrated on a team of underqualified Baseball Tonighters
Posted by: basicslop | December 09, 2008 at 01:53 PM
I think I just heard a bubble burst in Atlanta.
DM needs to find a way to clear up the logjam in OF and 1B while at the winter meetings. If we can find a way to move Teahen, Buck, and a couple other guys, we may be able to make an offer to Furcal, but it looks like the Dodgers are switching their focus to re-signing him now.
Things are certainly getting interesting.
Here's to the next Braves/Royals rumor. Cheers!
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 01:58 PM
"Woah Surprise Surprise everybody knew this except for dumb braves fans"
I said from the beginning that this was a stupid rumor and had no validity. So not all Braves fans are "dumb".
And Royal fans are just as dumb for thinking that the Braves would have any intentions of trading Jason Heyward or Tommy Hanson....for anyone...even Jake Peavy...much less Greinke.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | December 09, 2008 at 02:03 PM
You know, there were just as many Royals guys here salivating about getting Heyward/Hanson/Escobar/etc. as there were Braves fans pining for Greinke. We're all ridiculous. :)
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Royals fans are dumb for valuing a #1 or 2 starter?
Right, unproven prospects definitely hold more value. Our bad.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 02:11 PM
"And Royal fans are just as dumb for thinking that the Braves would have any intentions of trading Jason Heyward or Tommy Hanson....for anyone...even Jake Peavy...much less Greinke."
Its not that we believe that the Braves do have any intention of trading them, its just that's what its going to cost.
Posted by: Slayer | December 09, 2008 at 02:27 PM
For those of you trying to say that Greinke isn't all that good, go to a game when he pitches, and sit right behind home plate. Your minds will be changed.
Posted by: Michael | December 09, 2008 at 02:58 PM
I don't know how many are saying that. I certainly wasn't. I was trying to say that Francoeur isn't that bad.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 03:09 PM
"And Royal fans are just as dumb for thinking that the Braves would have any intentions of trading Jason Heyward or Tommy Hanson....for anyone...even Jake Peavy...much less Greinke."
I wasnt one of those dumb royals fans
all i said was, as highly as dayton moore and the royals think of greinke they would never do that trade unless one of the guys were including in it
Posted by: Focs | December 09, 2008 at 03:13 PM
To be honest, as a braves fan, that would be one hell of a steal for the braves. Greinke is not even at his prime and he still mows down batters left and right. Greinke would benifit from being a brave, because they would deffinitely give him more chances to win games than the royals do.
I would say that Greinke,Guillen,Dejesus or Teahen
for
Escobar,Locke,and Frenchy would be a good deal.
I know some of you, wouldn't agree with that.
Hanson,Heyward, are untouchable. Hason will probably end up in the pen at the end of 09. and be a primetime stud starting in 2010.
Heyward, is straight up nasty. He is a beast. At 6'4, 220 he will hit for a avg. of .290 or better, and atleast 20 homeruns in his rookie season.
Posted by: db4atlbraves | December 10, 2008 at 11:51 AM
If the Braves could ever land this rotation... we're talking a new age trip down memory lane with the team of the 90s:
Burnett, Greinke, Jurrjens, Vazquez, Smoltz/Campillo/Morton
It's a beautiful thought.
Posted by: BravesPKP | December 10, 2008 at 01:43 PM