![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Lowe, K-Rod | Main | Odds and Ends: Red Sox, Rays, Orioles »
3:07pm: There's a great debate going on in the comments about whether the Twins could swoop in and make an offer to Furcal now that they've pulled out of negotiations with Casey Blake. I do wonder if word that the A's and Furcal couldn't come to terms precipitated the sudden split between the Twins and Blake. Certainly, Tim saw a good fit between the Twins and Furcal back in October, and Furcal is four years younger than Blake -- but still, I think Furcal's monetary demands are pretty steep. No official Twins-Furcal rumors yet, but if anything comes in in the next couple of hours I'll update this post again.
As reported here yesterday, after shortstop Furcal rejected the A's offer of 4 years, $35-40MM, the A's in turn declined to go any further with Furcal.
2:13pm: Buster Olney says that the market for Rafael Furcal "never really developed; if you were to draw up a list of five players who have been hurt by the economic slowdown, Furcal might be somewhere near the top of the list." Olney breaks down how Furcal's suitors all ended up looking elsewhere, and says the A's biggest need is veteran starting pitching. Furcal is "the perfect player for some big-money contender to snag for a big-money, short-term deal, but such an offer may not emerge for some time."
Meanwhile, Athletics Nation agrees that "the only person who believes there is a big market for Rafael Furcal appears to be Furcal" and says A's GM Billy Beane is now the one holding all the cards in that (apparently bilateral) negotiation.
Chris Haft at MLB.com lists Oakland's other options at short.
Sarah Green writes for UmpBump and the Boston Metro.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053641a328970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thin Market for Furcal:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Looks like furcal could end up goin back to the dodgers. He should atleast prove he's healthy first before askin for the world from teams.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | December 06, 2008 at 02:16 PM
With the Twins no longer in talks with Blake I wounder if they'll kick the Furcal tires?
Posted by: MNRunLeft | December 06, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Yeah the Twins just got a whole lot more into this thing
Giants signed ER and now the A's can't sign Furcal ...
This would automatically fill one of the holes at short.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 02:24 PM
"With the Twins no longer in talks with Blake I wounder if they'll kick the Furcal tires?" If Furcal won't accept 4 years 35-40 million from the A's the Twins will definitely not after backing out on Blake because of he wanted a 3 year deal. That is the best offer he probably would've gotten.
Posted by: Slurve | December 06, 2008 at 02:27 PM
Furcal to the Braves to play second, thats my best guess at this point. the twins wont offer enoug, the A's have moved on. the braves and dodgers are the only two likely destinations. atlanta trades kelly johnson and then signs furcal.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 02:32 PM
"Looks like furcal could end up goin back to the dodgers."
I thought Colletti already said he didn't want Furcal back? So, either, Furcal takes less money or he'll be like Clemens and Bonds, and don't have a job.
Posted by: BravesRed | December 06, 2008 at 02:33 PM
You should remember though, that Blake is about 4 years older than Furcal, hence the hesitation on the Twins part about offering up a guaranteed 3rd year. For an upgrade at SS, which would greatly improve their offense as well as defense, I think the Twins won't reject that 3rd year flat out.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | December 06, 2008 at 02:36 PM
i dont believe the dodgers ever said they dont want him back, they were just preparing for him to leave because they didnt expect being able to re sign him. granted im not sure they want to throw 40 million or so at furcal and arent they still going after manny?
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 02:36 PM
Sarah, are you single??
Posted by: MPM | December 06, 2008 at 02:36 PM
BleedinBlue i get what you're saying but i just cant see the twins every surpassing the braves and dodgers on his list unless they offer a ridiculous amount of money
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 02:37 PM
although with blake likely headed back to the dodgers at this point i think that lessens their desire to bring back furcal as well.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 02:39 PM
The Twins should look into it, but they aren't going to offer 4 years and at 3 years, Oakland might be willing to pay a decent amount per year. Now if the A's just forget about Furcal entirely (I don't see why they would), then the market would be really, really thin for him.
Posted by: jehu | December 06, 2008 at 02:39 PM
This really makes me wonder what will happen with OCab.
Posted by: Alan | December 06, 2008 at 02:41 PM
i could see the Royals or Indians or maybe the Reds taking a look. if Beane really did withdraw the offer and wont look back, the reduced price could attract a number of teams with borderline SS options.
Posted by: charliescrabbles | December 06, 2008 at 02:41 PM
If Furcal actually would consider playing 2nd, this could be an excellent opportunity for the Cards. Having taken care of SS via trade (acquiring someone with a below-market contract) and the front office presumably optimistic about Carp's status (though I don't necessarily agree) they have resources that they can devote to 2nd base and Furcal could be the pop and the leadoff hitter that we need.
We would still need another arm in the rotation (maybe Looper resigns cheaper than arb would have come out to be after if there's no market for him) and if the FO doesn't trust the young arms to close yet, maybe they could sign a Hoffman type to a 1 year deal.
Posted by: cake | December 06, 2008 at 02:56 PM
These are great comments! I'll update the post with my thoughts on Furcal-to-the-Twins.
And no, I'm not single. Attractive females who love baseball are never single. Sorry. :-/
Posted by: Sarah Green | December 06, 2008 at 02:57 PM
I think Furcal will end up with the Cubs or Twins with less money than he was expecting. Possibly 8-10 mil a year.
Posted by: baseball52 | December 06, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Yeah, I'm surprised the Royals don't jump in here on Furcal. He'd fit in perfectly in the leadoff hole and at SS, they could move Aviles to 2B and then look to move either Teahen or DeJesus in a trade. 4 years @ $36-44M seems fair to me.
Posted by: Ralow | December 06, 2008 at 03:09 PM
You guys dont get it. I mention he'll play second for the braves and suddenly fans from teams like the cards on here saying ohh we need a second baseman, furcal would be good. Furcal loves ATL, he has his house there and has maintained that bobby cox is like a second father to him. Im saying he would accept second base to come back to the braves but he's not taking a pay cut and playing second base to play for teams like the twins and cards
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:11 PM
"And no, I'm not single. Attractive females who love baseball are never single. Sorry. :-/"
*sigh*
Oh well...it was worth a shot. :)
I think Furcal will resign with LAD.
Posted by: MPM | December 06, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Why would Furcal agree to go to 2B in St. Louis when he's a much better SS than Greene? They aren't ARod and Jeter. Why would he agree to be a 2B at all? SS's have much more value. He'd be voluntarily lowering his own salary.
Posted by: ChingChong | December 06, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Reds were supposedly in this thing earlier, especially if they cant get Dye,t he Reds might make a move on Furcal if we can trade or drop A-Gon
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | December 06, 2008 at 03:21 PM
Doesn't make much sense for the Braves to trade Kelly Johnson for a bat and replace him with Furcal.
Why not get a free agent outfielder and keep KJ, thereby spending less money?
Furcal only comes back if Escobar is traded for Peavy.
Posted by: NickC | December 06, 2008 at 03:29 PM
chingchong, im saying he'll play second for the braves but not for just anyone
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:32 PM
I think there's a huge difference between Blake and Furcal. If the Twins get the opportunity to find a shortstop like Furcal for just cash I think they'd jump on it.
The addition of Furcal to the Twins would fill an automatic void in the lineup and at short. I'd like to seem them sign him, since they are the only one expressing interest right now.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 03:36 PM
Bravesfan I think you might have your head in your anus. Not to be mean or anything but Furcal gawked at the thought of playing second base. There's no reason for him to. Besides, the Braves don't want him either, they have KJ who is perfectly capable.
Not to mention you're probably just too enigmatic about the thought of Furcal coming back.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 03:37 PM
NickC, the free agent outfielders right now of value higher than ryan ludwick are Dunn, Burrell, and Ibanez. We've shown no interest in any of those besides Ibanez and Id rather spend money on Furcal. Id love Dunn and KJ but it doesnt look likely at this point. Furcal brings an entirely different element to the braves than KJ, he's a leadoff hitter with speed. Furcal and Ludiwck>KJ and what we would get in free agency
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:38 PM
Furcal, 31, could expand his market if he were willing to move to second base, a position he has played extensively in winter ball.
From Ken Rosenthal, im just saying I dont think he'll give this option to every team
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Seems like the AL and NL central teams are the ones who make the most sense for Furcal...too bad those are the teams with the least money too offer. It makes baseball sense for teams like the Royals, Twins, etc. to sign Furcal. Too bad "baseball sense" is second on the priority list to "fiscal sense" when it comes to these teams making moves...
Posted by: Ralow | December 06, 2008 at 03:41 PM
but i am saying i think the braves could convince him to move to second
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Bravesfan I think you might have your head in your anus. Not to be mean or anything but Furcal gawked at the thought of playing second base. There's no reason for him to. Besides, the Braves don't want him either, they have KJ who is perfectly capable.
Not to mention you're probably just too enigmatic about the thought of Furcal coming back.
while i agree that in all likelihood it is a dream scenario, furcal really likes atl just like CC wants to be on the on the west coast and CC might pass on 30 million just to get this. a move to second from short is less to give up than that much money. the braves dont want him? thats inaccurate seeing as the braves have had multiple talks with kizner his agent
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 06, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Eh. The Braves wouldn't want him unless KJ or Yunel was traded. They're not gonna dump off 12 mil a year for a guy that has an injury history and move one of their middle INF starters just to spend cash.
After last season, it's hard to say that Furcal is an upgrade for the Braves.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 03:48 PM
I'm still take the over on 4-35/40 for furcal. Someone with access to writers is trying to work furcal over. My guess is we see our fair share of collusion this winter. The owners have a nice cover story and they will run with it.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 06, 2008 at 03:59 PM
With the Twins no longer in talks with Blake I wounder if they'll kick the Furcal tires?
no,furcals 3 yrs younger, wants 2 more yrs than they would give blake, coming of back surgery, and sts 2x as much as blake a yr.
the dodgers want furcal back. colletti said theyed welcome him back with open arms, but hey dont want a 4yr commintment(back surgery, ankle and dejesus jr is 2yr max away). he has said he doesnt want to play second. hell prob come back on a 2/26 deal, proves hes healthy and still get a nice payday. the dodgers goal is to rebuild the infield(or keep it the same) without giving more than 2or3yrs. theyd love furcal and blake to resign during the meetings, that would make their offseason, and still give them $ to play with(manny, pitching.)
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 06, 2008 at 04:04 PM
also, there is no collusion. its a 31yr old, still in"prime years" who coming off surgery, wanting 4yrs and a crapload of money to do it. not many teams want a SS commited for 4yrs off major surgery. bonds is much different, he brings not only health problems, but legal ones.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 06, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I am not saying this is case of collusion. Just generally saying this offseason sure seems like the right climate for collusion. I'll dispute 10 million or so is that much money when players are signing for twice that. I think furcal signs for less that four years probably but why would he take a discount just to get four years?
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 06, 2008 at 04:10 PM
Can someone please tell me why the Twins wouldnt be going after Orlando Cabrera??
OC is a easy GOld Glove SS that can hit for average and a decent speed.
Furcal is a great SS but has way to much of a Injury History to even be mentioned with Orlando in my opinion.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | December 06, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Because he's overrated and expensive.
We could spend the extra 2 million a year on Furcal rather than waste money on Cabrera. Cabrera would cost a draft pick too...
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 04:28 PM
Are you all high? People actually think the Twins would chase a half way legit free agent? When was the last one? Molitor? And even that wasnt really a "legit" with his age at the time and all. Dont get us Twins fans even the least bit excited.
Sincerely, All realisitc Twins fans
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Things are different now. We seem to be willing to spend the money and our GM is aggressive.
Get your head out of your butt and smell the roses.
Sincerely, a realistic Twins fan
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Furcal turned down the only 4 year offer he'll be getting. The market for Furcal just isn't there, especially on a 4 year deal. The "Twins way" seems to me as more dollar, less years.
Frankly, the Twins' offer to Torii Hunter was fair market value, looking at the quality of player he is. He's a 3 win player and NOT an elite defensive CF. The Twins 3/45 "lowball" offer was actually not much lower than what he should have gotten on market (assuming 5MM/win on FA market).
Just because other teams decided to WAY overpay for Hunter's services doesn't make the Twins "cheap". Casey Blake getting 3 years is WAY overpayment.
So yes, the Twins can seriously get Furcal.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 06, 2008 at 05:14 PM
Things are different now? $15 mil under '07 payroll and their big move in the '08 pennant race was getting Everymeal Eddie? That's willing to spend money? Wow.
Things won't be different until their share of the stadium costs/upgrades are paid for - period. There's still sitting at around $56 mil for '09 - they will trade or patch holes with garbage as usual and be cute and plucky, again.
Posted by: jhawk90 | December 06, 2008 at 05:19 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if Furcal took a 1 yr deal to reestablish his market value. He's a good player, but until he shows that he is healthy I can't see a team topping the A's offer.
And the A's offering it surprises me. They must think that Chavez/Furcal would be an excellent DL duo.
Posted by: kab21 | December 06, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Twins fan, our pay roll was around 75 million in '07 and was around 55 last year under what you called a "aggresive" GM. Those seem like direct contradictions to me.
And Melonis, and I guess twinsfan also, what free agent have the Twins ever signed that has started any kind of buzz? EVER? And even more so since 2000? I literally can not think of one guy the Twins have signed since the year 2000 that was the least bit exciting. They never sign a guy from a position that they need that is considered one of the best at that position.
So all I'm saying is until they do that, I dont believe it will ever happen. This team got where they are on drafts and trades. They do not have a history of improving in FA. So its just wishful thinking to think its going to magically start now.
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 07:24 PM
But let me be clear. I really hope they prove me wrong. I REALLY want to be but i gave up on the Twins signing decent free agents LONG ago.
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 07:27 PM
The fact that in his first year he made let's see ... 1, 2, 3 trades and actually cleaned house with all the bad players this summer makes us aggressive.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 07:55 PM
"Things are different now? $15 mil under '07 payroll and their big move in the '08 pennant race was getting Everymeal Eddie? That's willing to spend money? Wow."
Aggressive and "spending money" are two VERY different things.
2008 was a REBUILDING year. When teams rebuild, they don't have as many veterans/established players on their roster, and thus, their payroll is lower. 2008 was "look and see what the young talent can do". The fact that their talent came through and they were that close to making the playoffs was unexpected. And, maybe the Twins didn't take the BEST offer for Johan, but, if you look at 2008 as a rebuilding season, Gomez alone is EASILY worth more than the draft picks. Being involved in two of THE BIGGEST trades of the offseason is aggressive.
Inking your own players to extensions is also considered spending money. It's also a smart way to spend money. Especially if the player is someone like Joe Nathan, who is getting serious money for a closer.
And, regarding getting Everyday Eddie. Umm, the Mets, a team with a much bigger payroll than the Twins and a worse bullpen, got only Luis Ayala. Moot point. Guys like Fuentes, Huston Street, and George Sherrill were NOT traded mid-season.
I'm not saying I know whether the Twins are willing to go out and get Furcal, but with how much his price will drop in the coming few weeks, I wouldn't rule it out.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 06, 2008 at 08:21 PM
Going back to the Joe Nathan extension; 4/47, aka fair market value, to a guy who is elite at his position.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 06, 2008 at 08:25 PM
Oh. More "aggressiveness": Signing Morneau to a 6/80 extension. 80MM is serious money, and that's a big contract. That deal also went down during the Twins offseason. So much for "not willing to spend money".
Posted by: melonis rex | December 06, 2008 at 08:33 PM
"He" meaning Bill Smith, sorry.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Melonis,Well they cant let EVERYONE go. The point is they have NEVER EVER signed a big free agent. EVER. So just because they signed Morneau and Nathan doesnt mean they are suddenly spending money.Look back at earlier this decade when they passed on Thome,Thomas and Piazza. Granted they werent prime but all 3 went on to have a few decent years and we passed on them.
Plus this team was 15-20 million under on payroll in 08 then they were in 07 and with the new stadium coming and what guy have they been linked to? Casey Blake, thats it. I like Blake but they have needs beyond 3B and the only player they are linked to is a mid 30's 3B who is very decent and no doubt a upgrade over what we have now but its just getting old.They owe us a world series contendor and they wont do it . The state gave them a new stadium and there is NO sign to do everything they can to make this team a contendor. As a lifelong Twins fan this stuff of developing your own talent can only go on so long before you have to make SOME kind of a leap into FA or coming away with hands down the best player in a deal instead of being the one trading. I think our neighbors to East figured that out so i think its about time we do to. But they wont.
(Can you tell i have deep rooted issues with this team, my point drifted mid-paragraph)
Also Melonis just because the Mets didnt get a Fuentes or Sherrill type doesnt mean its ok that the Twins didnt.Im not saying i think the Twins should have went after one of them im just saying just because the Mets didnt do something that doesnt let the Twins off the hook. This team is overall cheap, and I dont buy its always because they have to be.
What "bad player" are you talking about Twinsfan? Just curious .
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 09:08 PM
Aggressiveness = taking advantage of a situation that presents itself. The AL was wide open in late '08 and Smith did nothing when the team was desperate for a RH bat and a decent bullpen arm. Good luck finding another year where the Yanks, Tigers, Indians and A's are all non-factors.
Spout off on all the extensions you want - they were the very least that should have been done given the players they lost, the revenues and salary available, and they STILL are under where they should have spent and HAVE spent in the past. They have always preached operating on the break-even model, and once the stadium became reality they incorporated those costs into their model. They front office are successful businessmen before anything else.
Twins fans and Hennepin county gave the Twins everything they wanted - money, increased attendance, you name it - and in return we got jack last year in the heat of a pennant race. They're in for around $167 mil for the park, cleared AT THE VERY LEAST $30-40 mil in '08, and there is no reason to expect more of the same this year.
Posted by: jhawk90 | December 06, 2008 at 09:27 PM
Im sorry guys i mean i want to think like you do but this team has never done anything to convince me a Furcal signing is even on their radar.
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 09:28 PM
LEN III said in his newest article that the Twins aren't very interested in Furcal because of cost and recent injury history.
Just saying, but I think the Twins are still willing to make a move.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 06, 2008 at 09:52 PM
Yeah i read that too but at the same time, at SOME point id like to see them take a risk. Furcals upside is so great that the injury risk shouldnt be a problem. I mean hell look at the A's, small market all that got Holiday, Brewers get CC and to a lesser extent the royals with Gil Meche and Jose Gillen.
Lets just go since 2000, who have the Twins signed that was even half as good as even Jose Guillen? I honestly cant name one player. THATS a problem.
They need to go out and risk sometimes, Furcal seems like a pretty decent risk.....at least to me.
Posted by: migoli | December 06, 2008 at 10:30 PM
The fact that this opportunity presents itself and the Twins brain trust doesn't see this as an opportunity because of Furcal's injury risk is infuriating. Have they ever noticed that teams that win the World Series tend to have multiple very good players on them? And that sitting pat has risks of its own? Their almost conservatism in this situation where they are presented with a golden opportunity to pick up an impact player at a position where they don't have anyone at a deep discount and they don't appear likely to act on that at all is almost unfathomable. Who is going to play SS now that Punto is gone anyways? They've got to acquire someone; it becomes known that if they chose to do so, they could be the only suitor of one of the best short-stops in baseball over the last 5 years; they have no in house options; their reaction: do nothing.
Posted by: BillSmithsBrain | December 07, 2008 at 12:34 AM