![]() |
|
|
| |
« D'Backs Keeping Snyder, Montero | Main | Orlando Cabrera Rumors: Tuesday »
9:15pm: Jon Paul Morosi says Beimel still tops the Tigers' list among lefties, but they've also expressed interest in John Parrish.
2:23pm: MLB.com's Jason Beck says the Tigers talked to Joe Beimel's agent at the Meetings. They intend to sort out their closer situation first though. The Reds also like Beimel.
2:28am: For roughly $4MM in '09 salaries, the Tigers filled two needs Monday with defensive-minded pickups Gerald Laird and Adam Everett. Now Dave Dombrowski will set his sights on a closer.
Jon Paul Morosi maintains that the Tigers are most interested in J.J. Putz and Kerry Wood. It may come down to how they'd prefer to pay - in prospects or in dollars. Morosi notes that Marcus Thames, expected to earn $2MM+ in '09, could be shipped out to save additional cash.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364a3a2b970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tigers Bullpen Rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I wonder what that mariners would get back for putz, I don't think they would give up porcello maybe bonderman.
Posted by: Sam | December 09, 2008 at 02:42 AM
I dont think they are going to be giving up Bonderman in a deal for Putz. it might be something like Larish/Clevlen and a minor league pitching prospect. They are said to be interested in Larish because Ibanez is leaving and they will need a lefty to come off the bench. Clevlen would give them another option for outfield and i have no idea who the 3rd player would be. Probably Marte or Figaro. But i hope they hang on to them, they could come in handy
Posted by: hitman79 | December 09, 2008 at 03:18 AM
Here is what we'll probably give up for Putz: Larish, Joyce, and probably Miner.
Posted by: rdccdr801 | December 09, 2008 at 04:14 AM
thames is solid.. mets should get him
Posted by: dapoktan | December 09, 2008 at 04:42 AM
"Here is what we'll probably give up for Putz: Larish, Joyce, and probably Miner" No way I'd give up Joyce in this deal. Three MLB ready players is too much for Putz.
Posted by: Rob M. | December 09, 2008 at 06:12 AM
Thames to the Braves sounds like a good fit for both clubs
Posted by: aj7380 | December 09, 2008 at 08:20 AM
why does almost everyone think that DD will include Porcello in a trade. He is not going anywhere so quit asking
Posted by: allstarlineup | December 09, 2008 at 09:02 AM
What about Thames to the Rays for a reliever? They need a right handed hitting OF, and he is a cheap option.
Posted by: Rob M. | December 09, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Thames for Edwin Jackson or Sonnastine?
Posted by: TigerFan54 | December 09, 2008 at 12:09 PM
"What about Thames to the Rays for a reliever? They need a right handed hitting OF, and he is a cheap option."
You have to add more into that deal from the Tigers' side if they want Sonnanstine. Jackson for Thames sounds reasonable.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 09, 2008 at 02:28 PM
"why does almost everyone think that DD will include Porcello in a trade. He is not going anywhere so quit asking"
Because it doesn't look like the Tigers are hesitant to trade top prospects...
Porcello for Putz straight up would be awesome for the Mariners. Although if I'm DD, I dont' do it.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 09, 2008 at 02:30 PM
John Parrish? JOHN PARRISH? The guy who started the season in the minors before being called up, interests the Tigers???
Well, you gotta think outside the box once in a while, I guess.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | December 09, 2008 at 09:26 PM