![]() |
|
|
| |
« Takahashi Down To Four Teams | Main | Should Top Free Agents Hold Out? »
FRIDAY: Slusser says Springer will earn $3.3MM plus another possible $300K for games pitched.
THURSDAY: Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle says the Springer deal is official and is worth more than $3MM plus incentives.
WEDNESDAY: Springer apparently took his physical today, though his deal with the A's is not yet official. The A's told reliever Andrew Brown they're releasing him to make room for Springer, according to Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle.
MONDAY: The AP says the A's are "close to finalizing" the Springer deal, with the physical the final step remaining. Not sure why they didn't say an agreement has been reached, then.
SATURDAY: According to Ken Rosenthal, the A's are "closing in on" a deal with Russ Springer. Rosenthal's source says the A's and Springer are "making progress, but not done." They're working towards a contract worth about $3MM plus incentives.
Rosenthal adds that the A's are ready to make a strong attempt to sign Orlando Cabrera if his asing price isn't too high.
Unlike Cabrera, Springer wasn't offered arbitration, so the A's won't have to surrender a draft pick to the Cardinals if the deal becomes official, despite Springer's status as a Type A free agent.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536f30de6970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A's Sign Russ Springer:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Perfect Beane signing. Why after all, would you want a reliever with some of the best numbers in the majors over the past three years?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | January 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM
The As are going to be a tough team this year with Giambi and Matt Holiday(sp)and Eric Chavez and Jack Cust, then add Cabrera who can hit. Russ Springer would be a good sign for the As as well..someone needs to compete with the Anaheim Bell Peppers
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Great, so A's are locking up Spring, Tigers are locking up Lyon. Hot damn the Twins better wrap up Gagne befroe someone comes in and scoops him up too.
Posted by: migoli | January 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM
If it is really true that Sheets can be locked down for two years and for less than 20 million, then the A's should go after him next. Oakland needs to lock down the rotation with a "real" ace.
If Duke gets pushed back to #2, Gallagher to #3 would make the rotation look a lot better. I know that Oakland has solid, solid, young pitching coming up but, they need more veteran presence.
Does anybody know if Sheets is the mentoring type? It'd be nice to have all the young guys feel free to ask him questions.
Posted by: green_and_gold | January 24, 2009 at 12:01 PM
I was hoping the Mets would go after Springer for some more bullpen help. The A's are starting to assemble a pretty good team, mixing up and coming young studs with some solid/great vet's.
Posted by: Blaise Junior | January 24, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I somehow doubt the A's have the flexibility to add the 8 - 10 MM that Sheets would command.
Posted by: Chris W. | January 24, 2009 at 12:55 PM
If the A's have money to go after Cabrera, they have money to go after Sheets.
Besides, they have all that Furcal money that never got used.
I'm not sure what the payroll is right now, but I believe its still less than last year.
Posted by: green_and_gold | January 24, 2009 at 01:27 PM
After Duke and Cust's arbi raises the A's will be sitting as is in the mid 50's I believe. Figures of $80 million were being thrown around earlier in the offseason as a possibility, but obviously that has changed some. I see no reason that the A's won't be able to go at least into the mid 60's with their payroll so another $10 million is likely available. That said, the A's won't sign Sheets. They have other priorities at this point, he's probably going to be too expensive, and throwing down 8 figures on an injury prone starting pitcher really isn't the best decision at this point. I expect the A's to sign Springer, Cabrera and probably Mark Mulder. All of those guys should fit in at under $10 million total and would go a long way towards rounding out a very solid offseason for the A's. If Mulder is healthy and can pitch he will fit nicely into the middle of the rotation to go along with a solid bullpen and offense.
Posted by: jpshark | January 24, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Springer should be signed because he'll be a good veteran presence in the bullpen with playoff experience.
I think that Sheets should be signed first over Cabrera. Sheets is a real bargain right now and the Rangers have already met with him twice. Sheets did make 31 starts last year and would really anchor the rotation.
Besides, Mulder's health at this point is much more questionable than Sheets. Sheets is also right handed. Gio/Braden/Outman/Eveland/Mulder are all lefties.
The offense is all in place with a good mixture of young and old, while the rotation is not. The pitching staff needs to have a veteran to look up to and take off some of the burden of inexperience.
Sheets signed at less than 10/year is a deal that should not be passed up. You probably won't find a deal like that in the near future.
Posted by: green_and_gold | January 24, 2009 at 02:30 PM
springer, cabrera and a vet RH started and i'll be ecstatic. Just hope we don't give up barton for glass legs johnson
Posted by: Trust in Beane | January 24, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Id rather let the kids play and hope they do well, then trade midyear or at the deadline if they arent playing well.
Duke-Eveland-Gallagher are set in stone. For the other 2 spots, why not let Braden, Gio, Outman, Anderson and Cahill battle it out? Those first 3 are ready-now, and If 1 or 2 of those guys cant hold it down thennnnn go and make a trade.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | January 24, 2009 at 04:14 PM
If we get Caberea and Springer that will be set.
But i wouldnt mind a pick up of Abreu or even Dunn?
and we do need a veteran starting pitcher
Posted by: Frank V | January 24, 2009 at 05:21 PM
I know I'm waaay late to this party but YAY!!!!
I. Love. This. Signing. Cheap, provides insurance for any regression that happens to Ziegler and Devine. With young unproven pitchers in the rotation a certainty, a strong bullpen is very, very valuable.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 25, 2009 at 02:22 PM
jpshark-
Between Sheets and Cabrera, Sheets is the larger improvement for '09, although Cabrera would probably be the bigger improvement for 2010, especially if Eveland, Braden, and Outman are all forced out of the rotation in 2010 like they should be.
After the 2009 season, Duke is a free agent, so he will probably walk, as will Holliday. That will net the A's 3-4 draft picks (depending on Duke's health). So hopefully we get at least one in the first round (Giants, if you sign Holliday, make sure your pick actually is unprotected, same for other teams). Hopefully BB can rack up a blue chip SS spect with these guys.
Let's assume both come on 2 year deals of about 20MM or less (or 1 year with an option), so payroll isn't the big issue.
Face it, BB has NOTHING in the SS department laying in the wings. Coleman/Christian/Leyja are slated for 2011, but even they are fringe prospects until they show some establishment in the minors. Cardenas is a 3B/2B, not a SS, although I could see him at SS for a year --- 2010---(he'd probably butcher the position defensively) as a stopgap and then moved somewhere else. So, you can assume that SS will be at replacement level for the 2010 season unless someone else is signed and/or a trade is consummated.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 25, 2009 at 02:39 PM
4. The most difficult pitcher in the majors against whom to square the baseball, of anybody who threw 40 or more innings, was Oakland's Joey Devine. Opponents mustered a .170 slugging percentage against him, with only three doubles, no triples and no homers in 45.2 innings.
http://insider.espn.go.com/esp...e%3dolney_buster
Posted by: arly2380 | January 26, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Where's the love for Eveland Rex?
He was good after he came back from the minors. All he had to do was not put the ball over his head in his delivery. After that he was pretty solid. I expect a big year from him.
I really like the Springer signing. Good veteran leadership in the bullpen for the young guys.
Posted by: green_and_gold | January 26, 2009 at 03:35 PM
How odd that the Cardinals let him go. In Springer's words: "I did everything I can to come back. I told them I'd take a pay cut, play for incentives. And it just never went anywhere ..."
Posted by: Monroe Says | January 26, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Good signing. I do think that the A's could use O. Cabrera, but it also seems like they could use a veteran presence in the rotation. If they're really tight on $, I would almost think a pitcher would be more important. Couldn't Patterson cover at SS if Crosby continues to flounder?
Posted by: drphonic7 | January 26, 2009 at 05:08 PM
"Couldn't Patterson cover at SS if Crosby continues to flounder?"
No. It would be Pennington or Petit at SS if not Crosby or an outside signing of OCab. Patterson is horrible defensively at 2B; he'll easily be worse than Crosby at SS. And Pennington is just as bad as Crosby at SS defensively; he's more of a 2B/3B type. He'd have to be an improvement with the bat to be an improvement over BoCro.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 26, 2009 at 07:02 PM
"Where's the love for Eveland Rex?
He was good after he came back from the minors. All he had to do was not put the ball over his head in his delivery. After that he was pretty solid. I expect a big year from him."
I agree that the delivery change really helped. He'll be a huge asset in 2009, and maybe 2010 (either as a pitcher or a trade chip).
I'm not saying Eveland is bad. He doesn't have the ceiling of a frontline starter though. The Coliseum will really, really help him and continue to. BOR starters are valuable, and IMO, Dana's ceiling is that of a solid #4 starter who will give you innings at league average. And in this game, that is very valuable.
I'm saying that if enough of Anderson, Cahill, Mazarro, Simmons, Gallagher, and Gio outpitch Eveland, which is a very strong possibility, he could lose his rotation spot simply because the A's have better options for the rotation and be traded. All six of those guys have higher ceilings than Eveland.
I'm more psyched about Gallagher than Eveland though. All of Gallagher's Oakland tenure was plagued by that injury which he tried to pitch through (hello Oakland medical staff, lolz); his numbers with the Cubs show a TON of potential and a very solid season to boot.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 26, 2009 at 07:09 PM
Ok. I get what you're saying. Yeah, I agree with you.
All of those guys have a higher ceiling than Eveland and you didn't even include Inoa. I do think that he'll be better than most people project, but he needs some run support.
All of our starters will have some breathing room with a greatly improved offense. Hopefully, this will lead to better pitching from everyone.
Posted by: green_and_gold | January 26, 2009 at 08:12 PM
"All of those guys have a higher ceiling than Eveland and you didn't even include Inoa. I do think that he'll be better than most people project, but he needs some run support. "
I didn't include Inoa because his ETA is so variable at this time.
And agreed on the run support. It should build confidence when you don't have to pitch a shutout to give the team a chance to win. Giambi and Holliday will have a few swings of encouragement for those pitchers though. And hopefully a few others chime in.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 26, 2009 at 09:09 PM
"No. It would be Pennington or Petit at SS if not Crosby or an outside signing of OCab. Patterson is horrible defensively at 2B; he'll easily be worse than Crosby at SS. And Pennington is just as bad as Crosby at SS defensively; he's more of a 2B/3B type. He'd have to be an improvement with the bat to be an improvement over BoCro. "
Crosby's defense was actually rated by various metrics in 2008 ranging from average to good. He was rated poorly before that though so it could just be an anomaly.
Also BA rated Pennington as the best defensive middle infielder in the A's system in 2008. He may have looked a bit shaky in his brief time in Oakland but I think you are putting way too much stock in 56 innings when you call Pennington a bad defensive SS and more of a 2B/3B type.
Posted by: DeJay | January 27, 2009 at 05:37 AM
Andrew Brown released?
Are his shoulder issues really THAT bad and irreparable?
I assume he takes a minor league deal with the A's though.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 29, 2009 at 09:11 AM
I really liked Brown coming out of the pen. He has the potential to be a very intimidating reliever. Hope he heals up and gets another whot with Oakland next year.
Susan Slusser is reporting the Springer signing is official.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=21&entry_id=35190
Posted by: 1quik6 | January 29, 2009 at 02:18 PM
A's fans everywhere would like to thank John Mozeliak and the St. Louis Cardinals for the keeping of the second round draft pick.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM
That's one thing that never made sense to me. Why didn't the Cards offer arb to Springer or Looper.
Situation A:
One/Both accept.
If that happened they would either have a veteran reliever that actually pitched well last year or another starter. I'll take Looper back to fill that rotation.
Situation B:
One or both decline.
DRAFT PICKS!
Damn it Mo, what the hell were you thinking? At the very least you'd have a possibilty of draft picks if not a solid pitcher back.
Overall I like Mo but this was inexcusable. It didn't make any sense whatsoever.
Posted by: Cardinals Fan Forever | January 30, 2009 at 02:37 PM