![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Lose Lowe; What's Next? | Main | Angels Do Not Have Interest In Dye »
10:59pm: O'Brien adds that Lowe did not receive a no-trade clause.
9:43am: According to David O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Braves agreed to terms with Derek Lowe on a four-year, $60MM deal. For all the talk of the Braves' failed offseason, they've added three quality starting pitchers. Even if Lowe wasn't their first choice, he probably should've been. Ken Rosenthal says the Braves made their four-year offer to Lowe "on the condition that he accept the deal quickly."
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536cca92d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Braves Sign Derek Lowe:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
This is why so many Braves fans hate the Mets-the obnoxious fanbase. The Braves have a solid rotation and plenty of depth. Moylan and Sori were lights out before injury and Gonzo is no slouch. We are loaded in our farm system and the Mets are not. Injuries killed any chance the Braves had last year. Now they have a pitching staff that is durable. Making 09 predictions now is stupid. Bring on 09!!
Posted by: desertbrave | January 13, 2009 at 10:35 AM
Btw I wanted to say Campillo did a decent job this year but he clearly wore down as a starter this year. Not sure you can depend on him for a full year.
If Hanson gets the nod over Campillo I think about changing it to 3-2 Braves.
Plus with the Prospects they saved by not going after Peavy I think the Braves only get more dangerous at this point.
I'm looking forward to seeing how Hewyard and Schafer progress.
Posted by: Gleb | January 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM
I'm really loving these moves from Frank Wren so far. He's been patient, stuck to his guns, and has ended up essentially reaching his goals without having to overpay for anyone. Personally, unlike many of you guys, I don't necessarily want us to go after Dunn, but I think its pretty much a moot point anyway as I doubt we have enough money to sign him at this point. I think he was more of the backup plan if we missed out on Lowe than anything else. I'd personally be content with a trade for Ankiel or Nady (assuming the price is reasonable) and a signing of Andruw.
Posted by: nixa37 | January 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Lowe
Jurrjens
Vasquez
Kawakami
Campillo/Glavine
Seriously, that's a nice looking rotation. That's about as good as Mutts and Phillies.
If/when the Braves get a quality outfielder....you better watch out.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | January 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM
once again omar falls short....with a new stadium and a new channel...u'd think they might be able to pull of some yankees-lite signings....lowe was a guy they needed and if they think they will get perez for 3 and 30 they are sadly mistaken
Posted by: JobaNation | January 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Good point about durable starters, that really helps out whole staff.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM
"Putz is a year removed from a 1.38 ERA season with SEA. Name one Braves reliever who is even in their ballpark??"
Moylan is a year removed from a 1.80 ERA. Before TJ last year it was 1.59.
Gonzalez' ERAs the four years before last year, when he was returning from TJ surgery: 1.59, 2.17, 2.70, 1.47.
Soriano since 2003 (excluding 2004, when he was in just 6 games): 1.53, 2.45, 2.25, 3.00, 2.57.
Knock off your nonsense. The Mets are good, the Braves are (on paper) way better than last year.
Posted by: daslied | January 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM
That's now a decent rotation. Not great enough to really wow you but solid enough that a St. Louis 2006 type of year is very possible. Lowe should be a good bet for the first 3 years and hopefully still decent by year 4. I like him better than AJ Burnett.
I would still feel that much better to have Smoltz around.
Posted by: ABravesFan | January 13, 2009 at 10:38 AM
The NL East is shaping up to be as much fun as the AL East this year. Good for baseball. I look forward to some good races.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 13, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Neutral voice here -
On paper, Braves rotation is now roughly on par with the Mets and Phillies, but certainly not above and beyond. Glavine, Kawakami and JJ are not locks to be good pitchers next year, braves fans should control their rabid emo selves. That being said, Braves rotation has a lot of upside, definitely exciting.
Braves Bullpen is solidly worse than the Mets and Phils. How does one even begin to argue otherwise? Braves best two relievers are about as injury-prone as they come.
Likewise, braves lineup is weak. Dunn would not be a bad idea.
Posted by: ChadGod | January 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM
strikethree...I would be curious to hear you explain what you believe the holes in our rotation are. I eagerly await your reply.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Well for starters: Kawakami.
Any foreign pitcher is a question mark especially since he missed much of last season with a back problem.
Vasquez is coming off a sub par year and gives up too many HRs. (Which I guess a move to the NL should change)
The rookies look good but Campillo hasn't pitched a full season yet. I guess he wouldn't need to being the 5th starter. However, let's see these guys put up the same numbers twice before labeling them as "solid".
Posted by: strikethree | January 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I am thinking Nady would be a good fit too, maybe one year rental but maybe you can work something out with him, without giving too many prospects up. Yankees will be asking a lot I think for Swisher.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Gee, the Braves fans are just beside themselves about this signing.
Look Lowe is a fine pitcher - a solid #2 IMO. I wanted him on the Mets but not at the price you guys paid. Paying 36, 37, 38 year old guys big money has been part of the Mets problems over the years. This is not a typical Braves move. Usually you are jettisoning guys like him.
And FWIW your 3/5ths of your rotation is old. Lowe (35), Vazquez (33) and Glavine (43)? I wouldn't feel overly confident in them.
Posted by: JimmyPage | January 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Guess iamnobody had no argument as to why Dunn is better than Abreu. Figures.
Oh and ChadGod, you obviously know nothing about baseball if you think Dunn wouldnt be a bad idea.
Posted by: JonB. | January 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Why the heck does everyone keep including Glavine in our rotation when he isnt even a part of it?
Posted by: JonB. | January 13, 2009 at 10:43 AM
metzfan
k rod is not as great as u make him out to be. he blew a ton of saves last yr. also u have one solid pitcher in santana. the others could be toss ups of whether they perform well or not.
desertbrave
that is y im afraid of where baseballs fanbase is going. everyone becomes arrogant and cocky after 1 ws or a few good season projections. the mets have proved they were not championship caliber teams in recent years, yet met fans refuse to accept it. the class in baseballs fanbase is dwindling fast and im saddened to see that. since the marlins and nats dont have fanbases the braves are alone as the class acts of the nl east
Posted by: clemsontribe24 | January 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM
"This is why so many Braves fans hate the Mets-the obnoxious fanbase. The Braves have a solid rotation and plenty of depth. Moylan and Sori were lights out before injury and Gonzo is no slouch. We are loaded in our farm system and the Mets are not. Injuries killed any chance the Braves had last year. Now they have a pitching staff that is durable. Making 09 predictions now is stupid. Bring on 09!!"
Yeah, don't let the clown Mets fans bring you down. As a Phils fan, I heard all last offseason about how adding Santana's numbers would put the Mets over the top. Same thing this year with Putz and K-Rod. They're quick to point out other teams flaws but never address their own. That is, until, the last month of the season!
Posted by: UtleyFan | January 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM
YES! This is a great signing for the Braves. The Braves rotation is now better than it was for most of last year and better than it was in 2007 when they finished only 5 games out of first.
If they get Adam Dunn for LF it will add much needed power to the lineup. I'm expecting a rebound year for Jeff Francoeur. He really hit into some awful luck last year.
Give Andruw Jones a look see in Spring Training and see if he can rebound. It wouldn't hurt none.
Rafael Soriano was outstanding in 2007 and will be healthy this year. Mike Gonzalez is lights out as a closer. Peter Moylan will be back in May sometime and he is solid. Blaine Boyer and Manny Acosta are good middle of the game. They just got over worked last year especially Boyer. He had an ERA under 4 during the first half of the season. If they re-sign Will Ohman who was great until the final month of the season when he got tired that would be great.
All of that would make the Braves have the best bullpen in the NL East. Let's not forget about J. C. Romero's 50 game suspension. They are going to miss him big time. Also don't expect Brad Lidge to have another year like he had last year. That was one of those once in a career type seasons. Then you have Madson. The Phils don't have anyone else in the Bullpen and the Mets only have Frankie Rodriguez and J. J. Putz. Mets' fans better hope those 2 guys can pitch every day because they don't have anyone else down there. Heilman doesn't scare anyone. Also hope that Putz doesn't have any more arm troubles like he did last year. Yeah you can say the same about Gonzalez and Soriano but Gonzalez had no problems coming back from Tommy John surgery and Soriano has shown no ill effects of his minor elbow surgery he had.
Braves have a real chance to contend for the division this year. The Mets and Phillies better watch out. Also the Marlins will be good too with their young starters having another year under their belts. Should be a great summer race in the NL East. GO BRAVOS!
Posted by: Tim | January 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM
OK, we will see. When you guys finish 3rd again, don't b*tch when I savor the opportunity to say, like in 2007 and 2008, "I told you so."
Posted by: metzfan22 | January 13, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Why are people still clamoring for Dunn? The whole point of not trading the farm for Peavy was to keep Schafer & Heyward.
Posted by: Gleb | January 13, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Hey this is Hot Stove all teams are excited about signings.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM
"JonB, Duaner Sanchez is now a year further away from surgery, so he will perform better this year. Sean Green is a more experienced Joe Smith, according to Keith Law. Feliciano is death to lefties, and Stokes throws 96 MPH with movement. Forget all that, look at past winners. They've all had dominant 1-2 punches at the end of a game. Lidge-Madson, Papelbon-Okajima (in '07), Wetteland-Rivera, etc. K-rod is a 26 year old, 3 time all star (i think its 3, thats off the top of my head). Putz is a year removed from a 1.38 ERA season with SEA. Name one Braves reliever who is even in their ballpark??"
Well despite having surgery, Mike Gonzalez blew only 2 saves last year. And he hadent blown a save in three whole years before that. The Braves cant really buy relievers. Its just not the top thing on an agenda for a team with their payroll. Heck, theyre having a hard time deciding whether or not to kepp Will Ohman for 2-3M. O and Moylan is pretty good as well.
Posted by: zephyr8 | January 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Oh and I forgot to add that Tim Hudson could be back in September and that would be huge.
Posted by: Tim | January 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM
The Braves have definitely improved a good deal, but there is no way they're the favorites in that division.
The Meta still have a very good rotation if they can bring back Ollie, which is likely.
The Mets now have a great bullpen, and the lineup is quite good
Right now, I think any team but Washington could win that division.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM
metzfan i hope ull still be coming to these threads even if ur team struggles out of the gates, or in mid season or chokes again. u really have no room to talk. the only team that can brag right now are the phils because they did what they were supposed to do: win the division, pennant and ws.
Posted by: clemsontribe24 | January 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM
I think metzfan22 is the one you hear at all the New York games - you know, the one behind the press box that loves to yell "Lar-ry!" every time Chipper comes to bat.
Funny how nobody in NY has realized that it does NOT phase him!
Posted by: Beowulf | January 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Did the Braves go into the off-season with a goal to overpay for a pitcher? They wanted Burnett for 5 years and $80M? They give Lowe 4 years and $60M when the best offer was 3 years and $36M?
Posted by: icedrake523 | January 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Why does everyone just keep throwing Glavine into the rotation as if he is a given? I'm sure the Braves will probably give him a shot if he proves his health, but I'm not even sure he's good enough to crack the rotation at this point. I like Campillo more than Glavine (BTW who said he was a reliever in the minors? He had 3 appearances out of the BP in his entire minor league career) at this point, and I think I'd prefer giving Morton and Reyes an early shot over Glavine as well.
Anyway, barring some unforeseen troubles, I think its safe to assume that Hanson will be in the rotation come early summer. I don't think I've ever been this excited about a Braves pitching prospect before. If you take a close look at his splits and consider that he didn't start throwing his slider until late June last year, the progress he made after adding it is just staggering. His strikeout rate went from the mid 8's in May and June to over 11 in July, over 13 in August, and then over 15 in the AFL. He also went from a flyball pitcher, to a much more neutral pitcher, and HRs became much, much less of a problem for him.
Posted by: nixa37 | January 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM
"OK, we will see. When you guys finish 3rd again, don't b*tch when I savor the opportunity to say, like in 2007 and 2008, "I told you so."
'Hubris' - exaggerated pride or self-confidence, often resulting in shame.
If the Mets had actually been to the playoffs in either of those years you could talk. At least we knew early on that our team would suck :)
Posted by: daslied | January 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM
"BravoFan, Gonzalez had one year as a "closer", and it was with Pittsburgh, so he didn't face pressure once. Add in that he just missed a lot of time with injury, and you are not looking so comfortable at closer. Soriano is homer-prone, and has never seen a pressure situation either. Face it, your team is really just not that good. The Mets have a thin rotation at this point, but their bullpen is strong and their offense scored the 2nd most runs in the NL last year. The Braves are not in a class with NYM and PHI at this point."
Look, Im sorry, I have to say that you are beginning to sound ridicules. You have every right to defend your team, but now all you are doing is bashing the braves. Not every player on their team sucks. They just dont get the publicity that the bigger teams get and that doesnt make them any les dangerous.
O and im just wondering, With the Mets much higher payroll, you shouldn't have to try to argue that your teams better, right?
Posted by: zephyr8 | January 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM
metzfan22,
Here we are in JANUARY and you can already predict where the BRAVES will finish! Wow that is really amazing!!!!! The fact of the matter is we made a great signing in Lowe. With him, we can compete in this divison. Chipper is a METS killer and B Mac is starting to follow suit. The best part about it is we are still in the market for a LF and I think now that Wren has showed some common sense, we will have a productive hitter and defensive player there. So don't make predicitions b/c we all know what happenend the last two seasons when the METS were predected to win the East in September
Posted by: SouthPaw Reliever | January 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Clemson, I was here the whole time, during each September. I took it like a man. Just last winter, the Braves fans were bragging that they were gunna win the World Series in '08. That clearly didn't happen. I'm trying to lower their hopes a little bit. Their team is not in the same boat as the Mets or Phillies at this point. Nothing bad, not talking trash, just stating a point. They are, at best, the third best team in the division.
Posted by: metzfan22 | January 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM
let me say a couple of things as a person who's liked the braves since the Mad dog, Glavine, Smoltz Years. Btw I also live in NY so I'm a pretty big Mets fan as well. No hating either one for me.
*Why are people still clamoring for Dunn? The whole point of not trading the farm for Peavy was to keep Schafer & Heyward. Dunn & Franc at the corners would block Heyward IMO.
*Who has the better rotation depends on
1)John Maine's health.
2)How good can Vasquez be coming over to the NL
3)Is Hanson in the rotation? I think you give the kid one more year in the minors.
4)Can Kawakami solidify the back of the Braves rotation? Really anyone's guess.
5)Will Pelfrey get even better this year? Took tremendous steps last year.
Posted by: Gleb | January 13, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Metzfan22,
Like I said before, if the Braves don't make it to the postseason, we Braves and Phillie fans will be enjoying another Mets collaspe. You act like you guys have won 26 WS championships. Oh wait...that's the OTHER NY team!!
Posted by: desertbrave | January 13, 2009 at 10:58 AM
I'm not sure why everyone thinks the Braves are going to be relying on Glavine in any sense. Pretty sure he is not the plans...at least I hope so.
strikethree...I agree with you on Kawakami. He is a wild card.
However, saying that Vazquez had a down year is far from the truth. He had a FIP of 3.74 to go along with an 8.64 K/9, 2.64 BB/9, and 3.28 K/BB...all extremely solid numbers. And those numbers are pretty much in line with the two seasons prior to that in the AL. He'll be fine.
Campillo pitched very well in the time we used him last season. Yes, he did tire towards the end but as you said being the #5 starter allows him the opportunity to have someone spot start for him in the need should arise. He pitched very well for the Mariners in AAA during the prior season so it's not exactly like he came out of nowhere. He's not a guarantee by any means, but I don't see how you can automatically discount him.
I can point the finger at your rotation as well if you would like. Pelfrey is coming off of a good season, but it's his first good season and he didn't pitch very well in Sept (as I'm sure you remember). Is the question mark of putting together back to back good years erased simply because he is younger than Campillo? Who else do you guys have other than Santana? John Maine certainly isn't a lock. Tim Redding isn't even league average.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM
metzfan22,
you are really a sour grape dude. Since when did you become Ms. Cleo and predict the future? Ok Braves finish 3rd in 07 and 08, well im going to make a prediction of my own, Collapse 09, hate to say i told u but....
Posted by: mRyAnkEe1231 | January 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM
OK, we will see. When you guys finish 3rd again, don't b*tch when I savor the opportunity to say, like in 2007 and 2008, "I told you so."
Yeah..it was great seeing the Mutts in the playoffs in 07..wait no, the chokers didn't make the playoffs. But things were different in 08 though, you got the ace of all aces Blohan Santana! You obviously won the world series...wait you say they didn't even make the playoffs?!?! D@mn, they must really suck.
Yeah, Mutts fans lost the right to make predictions.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | January 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM
It appears DOB jumped the gun. Someone close to the Braves is reporting the deal is close but nothing has been signed yet.
Posted by: TomahawkChop | January 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM
"And FWIW your 3/5ths of your rotation is old. Lowe (35), Vazquez (33) and Glavine (43)? I wouldn't feel overly confident in them."
Posted by: JimmyPage | January 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM
First of all, Glavine will most likely not even be on the team next year. The age of the Braves top six starting pitchers: 35, 33, 33, 23, 25 (Morton), 29 (Campillo). That is not exactly an ancient rotation.
And if we are talking about ages, the Mets position players are getting old: Delgado - 37, Beltran - 32, Tatis - 34, Schneider - 32, Ryan Church - 30, Castillo - 33.
I don't have the stats with me but the average age of the Braves is MUCH younger than the Mets.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | January 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM
"Clemson, I was here the whole time, during each September. I took it like a man. Just last winter, the Braves fans were bragging that they were gunna win the World Series in '08. That clearly didn't happen. I'm trying to lower their hopes a little bit. Their team is not in the same boat as the Mets or Phillies at this point. Nothing bad, not talking trash, just stating a point. They are, at best, the third best team in the division."
Thats in your opinion, right? And your name just happens to be metzfan22? I think we should all just wait and see. In baseball its a long year and thing are not always as they seem. Some teams will have more injuries than others. Its anyones guess what will happen. The Tigers were supposed to win thwe World Series last year, right?
Posted by: zephyr8 | January 13, 2009 at 11:01 AM
*Who has the better rotation depends on
1)John Maine's health.
2)How good can Vasquez be coming over to the NL
3)Is Hanson in the rotation? I think you give the kid one more year in the minors.
4)Can Kawakami solidify the back of the Braves rotation? Really anyone's guess.
5)Will Pelfrey get even better this year? Took tremendous steps last year.
Posted by: Gleb | January 13, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Why would Vazquez get worse coming over the to NL?
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 11:04 AM
"I'm really loving these moves from Frank Wren so far. He's been patient, stuck to his guns, and has ended up essentially reaching his goals without having to overpay for anyone. Personally, unlike many of you guys, I don't necessarily want us to go after Dunn, but I think its pretty much a moot point anyway as I doubt we have enough money to sign him at this point. I think he was more of the backup plan if we missed out on Lowe than anything else. I'd personally be content with a trade for Ankiel or Nady (assuming the price is reasonable) and a signing of Andruw."
Agree with all of this, you're a smart guy.
I think Wren has been great so far, and anyone who disagrees simply isn't looking at the whole picture.
Wren has avoided overpaying for free agents such as Burnett, Lowe and outfielders, and now he's managed to get Lowe for 4/60, while also adding Kenshin Kawakami and Javier Vazquez.
The Vazquez move will prove to be quite prudent, when he turns in a very good season. The guy was a victim of poor luck last year, and has always consistently posted 200 innings and good peripherals.
Wren has taken his time, waiting for opportunities to take shots while not overbidding for guys.
Going over 5/80 for A.J. would've been a huge mistake, and 5/80 may be a mistake in itself.
Giving up Esco, Gorkys, Morton and Locke for Peavy would have been overpaying.
Wren has avoided mistakes, and honestly that's one of the key parts of being a good GM.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Originally posted by metzfan:
OK, we will see. When you guys finish 3rd again, don't b*tch when I savor the opportunity to say, like in 2007 and 2008, "I told you so."
I LOL'd. And when the Mets once again fail miserably in September, I will savor the opportunity to call you a tard.
Posted by: Longlorious | January 13, 2009 at 11:06 AM
The Braves were desperate for pitching and Lowe was desperate for a mercenary big money contract although he is not worth it. 2009 - Lowe will be 12 - 11 with a 4.03 ERA
You read it here first. And boy will he be boo'd out of Shea Stadium. Braves arent going anywhere this season
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM
braves couldnt score runs last year wit tex. chippr havin a career yr which u cant expect again. i dont see how they score more runs wit lowe pitching. this team wont score enuff to win.us even wit dunn. hr or dunn. no pun intended
Posted by: williebeamen | January 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM
tomahawk,
where is the link for that?
Posted by: desertbrave | January 13, 2009 at 11:10 AM
As a Braves fan, I am fine with this signing. I don't think Lowe will be worth $15 million at the end of the contract, but he should age relatively well as a sinkerballer. It's a solid move.
The Braves-Mets debate is moot, the Phillies are the best team in the division right now. Whoever said anyone but the Nationals is in contention is right. Can't overlook anybody (except the Nationals for now). The Marlins look plenty strong, plenty young, and plenty talented. Braves are an improvement from '08 in that they shouldn't completely fall apart due to injury like they did last year, thus should be contenders. Mets always spend enough to be in contention. Phillies are basically the same team they were last year.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | January 13, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Wow...you Braves fans are really hitting that kool-aid hard. Signing Derek Lowe and a rookie Japanese pitcher is enough to make up 20 games on the Phils and 17 games on the Mets? Seriously?
Posted by: AstoriaGuy72 | January 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM
I like Lowe alot, but I wouldn't have paid him 4/60 in this market. I said all along it would be a question of who would give him the 4th year and it wasn't us, and I'm fine with that.
Now just go get Perez, and our rotation is at worst as good as last year (Which was pretty damn good in itself). And sorry, but no, this doesn't make us desperate, we've said all along Wolf would be the next fallback, I know that's not the PR-friendly choice, but he put up an ERA as good as Perez did last year.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | January 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Why did we sign Lowe? We already have a true ace in Buddy Carlisle. He is going to break out this year. I predict Cy Young.
There is way too much arguing going on here about mets and braves while all of us should be worried about the Marlins, they have the best pitching staff and are improving.
Posted by: uwalfos | January 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM
strikethree
Well for starters: Kawakami.
Any foreign pitcher is a question mark especially since he missed much of last season with a back problem.
"Any foreign pitcher is a question mark" I agree.
Overwork in Olympic games by foolish manager aggravated his illness.
back ploblem was mild, but mental anguish was serious. So he aligned in minors two month.
Posted by: giles24 | January 13, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Originally posted by TripleHHH: "The Braves were desperate for pitching and Lowe was desperate for a mercenary big money contract although he is not worth it. 2009 - Lowe will be 12 - 11 with a 4.03 ERA
You read it here first. And boy will he be boo'd out of Shea Stadium. Braves arent going anywhere this season"
I so hope that you are a Mets fan. So then I will laugh joyously at your "intelligence." It will be hard for Lowe to be booed out of Shea Stadium since they won't be playing there this year.
Posted by: Longlorious | January 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM
"I'm really loving these moves from Frank Wren so far. He's been patient, stuck to his guns, and has ended up essentially reaching his goals without having to overpay for anyone. Personally, unlike many of you guys, I don't necessarily want us to go after Dunn, but I think its pretty much a moot point anyway as I doubt we have enough money to sign him at this point. I think he was more of the backup plan if we missed out on Lowe than anything else. I'd personally be content with a trade for Ankiel or Nady (assuming the price is reasonable) and a signing of Andruw."
I disagree with you about Dunn. Pat Burrell got 2 years 16 million. Dunn won't get more than that and most likely will get less.
Ankiel and Nady are both free agents after the season and I don't want the Braves giving up more prospects for 1 year rentals. That has killed is with Drew and Teixeira.
I think Frank Wren has seen how that can kill a farm system in a hurry.
Posted by: Tim | January 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM
"The Braves were desperate for pitching and Lowe was desperate for a mercenary big money contract although he is not worth it. 2009 - Lowe will be 12 - 11 with a 4.03 ERA
You read it here first. And boy will he be boo'd out of Shea Stadium. Braves arent going anywhere this season"
Uh..
May I ask who you are, and if you have any magical powers to tell the future?
"Wow...you Braves fans are really hitting that kool-aid hard. Signing Derek Lowe and a rookie Japanese pitcher is enough to make up 20 games on the Phils and 17 games on the Mets? Seriously?"
If this was the case, then why would teams even try?
The Braves have many young players who stand to improve, and have added good players to fill holes on the team.
And either way, I still think they're building towards 2010 and beyond far more than 2009.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM
This is a huge blow to the Mets. The Mets off-season is starting to look like a failure, we needed a durable #2 more than we needed both a set-up AND closer, and we're still looking. I need to change my handle to "FireOmarMinaya" or OmarMinayaClueless"
Posted by: Art | January 13, 2009 at 11:17 AM
"k-rod isn't that good"
You still need to pitch well to get 62 saves you know.
"K-rod pitches and inning. tons of pitchers can pitch an inning w/o any runs. A real pitcher gets ground balls and gets out of bases loaded and nobody out with out runs scoring"
Yeah tons of pitchers can pitch a scoreless inning, but just not the 9th. There are many pitchers that are really good pitching the 8th inning, but can't be near the 9th to close a game.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | January 13, 2009 at 11:19 AM
"Guess iamnobody had no argument as to why Dunn is better than Abreu. Figures."
lol, sorry i can't be at my computer constantly. It's a simple matter of looking at their WAR, wOBA, etc. for the past few years:
Abreu:
2006 - 3.3 WAR, .393 wOBA
2007 - 2.2 WAR, .360 wOBA
2008 - 1.1 WAR, .368 wOBA
Dunn:
2006 - 2.0 WAR, .365 wOBA
2007 - 3.1 WAR, .399 wOBA
2008 - 1.9 WAR, .383 wOBA
That pretty much tells the story. Abreu is old and falling off hard, Dunn is not.
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Why did we sign Lowe? We already have a true ace in Buddy Carlisle. He is going to break out this year. I predict Cy Young.
Posted by: uwalfos | January 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Good point. Not sure how I forgot about that guy. His facial hair alone should be worth a few wins.
~~~
chippr havin a career yr which u cant expect again.
Posted by: williebeamen | January 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Yup, because it's not like Chipper has posted 4 straight seasons with an OPS+ over 150. Even if his season isn't as good as last years, which it won't be, he's still arguably the best hitter in the game behind Pujols.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 11:21 AM
I like this for the Braves. This will definitely help them push for a playoff spot. Lowe is qualtiy pitcher, maybe not as flashy as Santana or whatever but he will still win you ball games and that's what it comes down to.
Posted by: Ben | January 13, 2009 at 11:21 AM
what about signing dunn to play first base and then trade kotchman in a package for a legit lead off hitting outfielder? thoughts?
Posted by: robcol88 | January 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Met fans just can't help themselves, they have to be azzholes. If the Mets had signed Lowe all we would hear is how great they are going to be and how durable and consistent Lowe is. But as soon as someone else gets him, he's overrated and no big deal. Keep mentioning how bad Atl was last season, but never mention that they lost Smoltz, Glavine, Hudson, Moylan, and Soriano. I'd like to see any other team lose all those pitchers and still compete. It's not possible.
Posted by: njbraves | January 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Does this signing keep us from getting a Dunn or a Hudson type hitter?
Posted by: baseball101 | January 13, 2009 at 11:23 AM
""k-rod isn't that good"
You still need to pitch well to get 62 saves you know."
You do need to be good to get 62 saves, but you also need to be extremely lucky. More so the latter than the former.
"There are many pitchers that are really good pitching the 8th inning, but can't be near the 9th to close a game."
And here is the sentiment that created the almighty "Closer" label.
Supposedly, certain guys can be great pitchers in the 8th, but give them save opportunities and they blow up.
This is true, sometimes, in unique cases. But for the most part, a great reliever is a great reliever, and if he can strike guys out from both sides of the plate then he can be a closer.
K-Rod is still a very good closer, but he's not record-setting good by any means.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 11:23 AM
"Look Lowe is a fine pitcher - a solid #2 IMO. I wanted him on the Mets but not at the price you guys paid. Paying 36, 37, 38 year old guys big money has been part of the Mets problems over the years. This is not a typical Braves move. Usually you are jettisoning guys like him."
...One of the few good posts in this entire thread.
Oh, and "Metzfan" ... what are you, 13? Stop acting like an idiot. Worry about your own team before you start trashing others. We all know the Mets have enough problems to make Taxpayer Field a big disaster.
Posted by: Omar's Wallet | January 13, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Who cares if Lowe is not an ace, he only has to be the number one guy for a year until Hudson comes back then he will be a number 2, not every team has CC, Beckett or Johan. He is a better opening day starter than over half of the teams in mlb and if Hudson can come back for August and September and we are still in it, than watch out Hudson, Lowe, and JJ in a 5 game set. Pretty good odds. Still need that bat but even w/o a major addition we will still be very competitive. Yunel, KJ, Kotchman take the next step and Frenchy bounces back could be a very good team.
Posted by: siskel_god | January 13, 2009 at 11:26 AM
I like this signing, I really do. The Braves have a great set up for Lowe with at least average infield defense across the board and a very strong SS and 3B. He should have some strong numbers and look like a solid signing.
However, and I do understand Braves fans getting excited (I'm a Cubs fan, I swear I turn into a slobbering fool at the beginning of every year, personally...) with offseason moves, but I'm honestly interested why you are all so excited about Vasquez. You say he had a down 2008, ok... well his ERA+ over the last 5 years is:
2004: 92
2005: 100
2006: 98
2007: 127
2008: 98
So you can say he had an unlucky 2008, and I can say he had a lucky 2007. All signs indicate that he's a league average pitcher at best. He'll offer you a low to mid 4 ERA and, eat a ton of innings and keep the walks down. But he also averages 9 hits/9 innings. He's very underwhelming, and I think he's a good #4 on most competing teams. I would not want him in my playoff rotation.
Not ripping on him, just want honest opinions. I don't dislike him, but seeing him listed as your #2 scares me.
Posted by: Bdlugz | January 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM
question - does this mean sheets will finally sign with someone? or is it going to be perez than sheets? as a ranger fan, i get more and more worried the longer the talks with sheets drag on, mostly because it wouldn't surprise me for a random team to swoop in and give him better money and the rangers to lose out once again.
as far as lowe as concerned, good signing, will be good in atlanta. i do think he could have been had for slightly less money, around 4/54. still solid though.
Posted by: tmoney352 | January 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM
"I'm honestly interested why you are all so excited about Vasquez."
Probably has something to do with his career 3.93 FIP in the AL.
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Just watched some tape on Kawakami. Throws a fastball from 87- 90. He throws the cutter and his fastball can have a 2 seam motion to it. His slow curve comes in around 65 and has good drop. Also there is footage of him throwing a forkball. Very devastating. I have to say even though it was a highlight reel, his control looked pretty good. His fastball had very good positioning.
So in review
2 Seam fastball 87-89
Cutter 87-90
Forkball 85-88
Curveball 65-70
Also saw him throw a slider, unless it was just a really good cutter.
Posted by: zephyr8 | January 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM
njbraves - "If the Mets had signed Lowe all we would hear is how great they are going to be and how durable and consistent Lowe is. But as soon as someone else gets him, he's overrated and no big deal."
That's untrue to a large extent. It seems like the Mets fanbase was split on wanting Lowe over Perez. I've heard many people argue for Perez, and many people argue for Lowe. Sure, you'd get some idiot fans doing that, but a large portion of the mets base wants Perez over Lowe.
Posted by: Omar's Wallet | January 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM
The Braves current rotation is now entirely right handed. Nevermind the Mets lineup, it's going to look much worse when matched up against the Phillies lineup.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | January 13, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Lowe is a nice signing, but I think kawakami is a complete question mark. You never know how japanese pitchers will translate...position players either. I really don't think kawakami is anything to be counted on at this point, although he has the chance to be good.
Posted by: SkiBolton | January 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM
"The Braves were desperate for pitching and Lowe was desperate for a mercenary big money contract although he is not worth it. 2009 - Lowe will be 12 - 11 with a 4.03 ERA
You read it here first."
And K-Rodless will get lit up all next year. You heard it here first.
"Wow...you Braves fans are really hitting that kool-aid hard. Signing Derek Lowe and a rookie Japanese pitcher is enough to make up 20 games on the Phils and 17 games on the Mets? Seriously?"
I love how people talk about the Braves like they were just indescribably horrible last year. Dude, they pretty much lost there whole effing rotation to injuries (Tim Hudson, John Smoltz Tom Glavine)and lost there two top relief pitchers (Moylan and Soriano). Also had to rely heavily on the likes of JoJo Reyes (3-11 5.81) and Charlie Morton (4-8 6.15). It's a wonder they didn't lose more than 90 games with the things that happened to that team.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | January 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM
I disagree with you about Dunn. Pat Burrell got 2 years 16 million. Dunn won't get more than that and most likely will get less.
Ankiel and Nady are both free agents after the season and I don't want the Braves giving up more prospects for 1 year rentals. That has killed is with Drew and Teixeira.
I think Frank Wren has seen how that can kill a farm system in a hurry.
Posted by: Tim | January 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM
-----------------------------------------
Dunn is almost certainly destined to get more than Burrell. He's better, he's younger, and Burrell took a discount because he wanted to play for the Rays. Its also extremely unlikely the Braves still have ~10 million (minimum for Dunn) to spend as they went into the offseason with around $40 million ($45 million was always incredibly optimistic) and they've already spent at least 35 million.
I realize both Nady and Ankiel are free agents at the end of the season. That's one of the reasons they make sense for the Braves because they wouldn't be blocking any young players. They also will clearly come with a much, much smaller price tag then guys like Drew and Tex did. Sure, I don't want to make a deal for either one if the cost is significantly valuable prospects, but I think its far more likely that neither one would take a single prospect out of our top 15.
By the way, I don't see how you can complain about the Drew deal considering he was the reason we made the playoffs that year and we moved Wainwright right before he dealt with an injury riddled 2004 season and extremely disappointing 2005 season. The Braves saw there was something wrong with him and moved him for a lot of value. The fact that he has turned things around years later (and some injury questions still linger) is rather irrelevant as that couldn't have been predicted with any certainty.
Posted by: nixa37 | January 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM
In Japan, kawakami need six days rest.
Posted by: giles24 | January 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Thankfully, I have NOT been one of the ones criticizing Frank Wren. I think he did a great job last year and this season as well.
My biggest fear was of trading multiple talented young prospects for some other team's over-the-hill veterans. So far, the only trade that involved multiple prospects has been for Vazquez. And the Braves needed a middle of the rotation pitcher who could eat a lot of innings - and that is Vazquez.
I think Wren has positioned the Braves to be competitive next year without giving up the farm system. Excellent!!!
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | January 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Lowe is a good sign. The money and time of the contract are about as close to right as you are going to get when buying free agents, in my opinion.
Two arms are going to explode next year K-Rod and Peavy. Explode meaning surgery not amazing year.
Also, metzfan clearly finds humor in you guys arguing with him. Just ignore him and talk about how excited we all are about the signing amongst ourselves.
Posted by: Phillip_Cannon | January 13, 2009 at 11:39 AM
To everyone who keeps bashing our aceless staff I bring up once again 2004
1. Russ Ortiz
2. Mike Hampton
3. John Thomson
4. Horacio Ramirez
5. Jaret Wright
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | January 13, 2009 at 11:39 AM
He's very underwhelming, and I think he's a good #4 on most competing teams. I would not want him in my playoff rotation.
Not ripping on him, just want honest opinions. I don't dislike him, but seeing him listed as your #2 scares me.
Posted by: Bdlugz | January 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM
#4!? Damn man, not trying to be insulting but I find that an incredibly low ceiling for the guy. Yes, he does give up more hits than a typical front end starter would, but he keeps the walks down (as you stated) and also has a 7.99 K/9 for his career. Supporting a 3.34 K/BB for his career also is very encouraging. I think he's easily a #3...without question...and most likely at least a #2. As stated earlier, I'm looking forward to getting a chance to watch him on a consistent basis so I can try to figure out what has been keeping him from reaching his potential.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 11:39 AM
The Braves are a better team with the signing of Lowe and Kawakami. Thats not a bad rotation. I look forward to some good baseball in the NL East this year.
Posted by: phillyjoe | January 13, 2009 at 11:41 AM
I think Vasquez is going to surprise nothing else he will get deep into ballgames and hand it over to the bullpen. Thats better than JOJO or Charlie.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | January 13, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Why are we (the Braves) being compared mostly to just the Mets, and not to the World Champion Phils?
Posted by: SpensBross | January 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Good fit for both Lowe and the Braves...
Posted by: EnTheos | January 13, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Congrats to Braves. A mid-30's Lowe is better than a 41 year old with bad shoulder Smoltz at this point.
Beat the Mets, beat the Mets, step right up and sweep the Mets!
Posted by: Russell | January 13, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Kawakami in the video I watched looked like he was really good on the corners of the plate. Def a good sign. Greg Maddux proved if you could hit the corners you didnt have to have overpowering stuff.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | January 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM
The Braves current rotation is now entirely right handed. Nevermind the Mets lineup, it's going to look much worse when matched up against the Phillies lineup.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | January 13, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Did you even bother to look at their splits? Just curious.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | January 13, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Im happy about the signing. I hope that we are once again competing for the division. The Mets and Phillies both have a lot of talent. I honestly think we are one more piece away from competing but i am always optimistic.
Posted by: Atlanta32 | January 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM
i think atl has the best rotation right now and ollie wont change that. mets 2nd and phillies distant 3rd. remember cole is the only reliable one in that rotation. moyer gets knocked around alot, blanton is awful and myers is wild when streaky. but the bullpen without a doubt goes to the mets. it doesnt matter how tight the game is at the end of the 7th, if u dont have a 1-2 punch to finish the game consistently then a good rotation can go to waste. ie the indians for the first half of last year.
Posted by: clemsontribe24 | January 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM
The Braves do not have the best rotation right now. I think even Met fans can agree that their rotation isn't set and as good as The Phillies right now (come on Met fans, put away the hatred and be realistic for a moment and you know it is true).
Can't knock Phils bullpen last year, especially a closer that went perfect for a whole entire year.
If you want to talk about the Phillies rotation than dont go buy what you saw only in the playoffs. Cole Hamels didn't have that good of a regular season. He struck a lot of guys out but his record wasn't what you would like to see out of your #1. Myers had an outstanding second half. Moyer and Blanton get hit of off but somehow they still manage to win games. With the Phillies, Blanton was 12-4 and I believe and Moyer managed to win 16 games last year or something like that.
I know people like to show a lot of confidence in there favorite team but try to be realistic at the same time.
Posted by: Aaron | January 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM
"To everyone who keeps bashing our aceless staff I bring up once again 2004
1. Russ Ortiz
2. Mike Hampton
3. John Thomson
4. Horacio Ramirez
5. Jaret Wright"
*plucks eyes out* Wow...and to think we actually won close to a 100 games with that. LOL!
I like our 09 rotation even better now. Thanks.
"Why are we (the Braves) being compared mostly to just the Mets, and not to the World Champion Phils?"
I was wondering that same thing. I guess it's because the Mutts are more hated than the Phillies.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | January 13, 2009 at 11:54 AM
"The Braves do not have the best rotation right now."
Haha, no, really, they do.
Lowe Blanton
Jurrjens = Myers
Kawakami > Moyer/whoever
Campillo > whoever (Happ?)
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:57 AM
"I was wondering that same thing. I guess it's because the Mutts are more hated than the Phillies."
It's probably because the Mets are the best team in the NL East right now.
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
weird that didn't show up...
i'll try again:
Lowe Blanton
Jurrjens = Myers
Kawakami > Moyer/whoever
Campillo > whoever (Happ?)
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM
wtf why is it doing that
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM
oh i get it
weird that didn't show up...
i'll try again:
Lowe less than Hamels
Vazquez > Blanton
Jurrjens = Myers
Kawakami > Moyer/whoever
Campillo > whoever (Happ?)
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
"It's probably because the Mets are the best team in the NL East right now."
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | January 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM
"Not ripping on him, just want honest opinions. I don't dislike him, but seeing him listed as your #2 scares me."
Vazquez is not the Braves #2 starter. Jair Jurrjens is. The kid was great last year and will only get better.
Posted by: Tim | January 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM
No, really, they are.
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM
"In Japan, kawakami need six days rest."
There have been very few Japanese starters who came to the U.S. at that age and succeeded. In fact, I can't think of one. Maybe it's because of that 6-day schedule. It's just too hard for older pitchers to adjust.
Posted by: caseyB | January 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Smoltz's Beard, I do agree with a lot of what you said, obviously you brought up point I already made. It just concerns me that someone with a career ERA+ of only 105, and an ERA+ below 100 over the last 5 years is considered a #2. You speak of potential, but he's going to be 33, his prime is past him. I watched him a lot in Chicago, and was never impressed with him passed a bad #3 or as I said, a very good #4.
Posted by: Bdlugz | January 13, 2009 at 12:03 PM
"Vazquez is not the Braves #2 starter. Jair Jurrjens is. The kid was great last year and will only get better."
Do you really think they'll make Jurrjens #2?
Posted by: iamnobody | January 13, 2009 at 12:03 PM