MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« John Smoltz To Sign With Red Sox | Main | Orioles Rumors: Roberts, Uehara, Zaun, Pudge »

Jake Peavy Rumors: Wednesday

10:37pm: Kevin Towers said tonight the Braves made a good offer for Peavy a few months ago, but it was unclear whether Peavy would approve a trade there.  He also said a proposal from the Cubs "would fill several holes" on the Padres' roster.  Peavy's agent Barry Axelrod says a framework was in place with the Cubs at the Winter Meetings but they were "trying to fill out that framework" by acquiring some pieces.

Bruce Miles runs through the chances of the Cubs signing various free agent starters mentioned below.

3:32pm: Padres CEO Sandy Alderson doesn't believe there have been new talks with the Cubs, though that is not exactly what Wittenmyer said below.  Alderson said it's likely Peavy will be with the Padres on Opening Day.  He added that the Padres were never that close to a deal with the Braves and did not have an offer from the Cubs on which they could give a yes or no.  Also, he doesn't believe the team's impending sale changes their position on Peavy.

10:03am: According to Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times, "those close to Jim Hendry expect him to restart the Jake Peavy talks" now that the Cubs have unloaded salary with the Jason Marquis trade.  Hendry admitted yesterday he hopes to add another pitcher before Opening Day.

Wittenmyer notes that the Cubs' 2010 payroll was unaffected by the recent moves, so Hendry would need a nod from the new ownership group before taking on Peavy's contract.  The new ownership could be in place with just enough time for the Cubs to swing a Peavy deal, Wittenmyer believes.

As alternatives, Wittenmyer suggests Braden Looper and Tim Redding would fit better financially than Derek LoweDave van Dyck wonders if Andy Pettitte could be a fit.  Bob Klapisch says the Mets have considered Pettitte.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536b0b29f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jake Peavy Rumors: Wednesday:

Comments

I agree with you scrib on not holding a trade up on Marshall, I just didn't think that the cubs were looking to add him. If we have to part with him to get peavy, then that's what we have to do.

Bleacher Buddha

I don't think that soriano will be moved out of the 1 hole either, unless we some how got roberts, which I don't think will happen.

But I didn't write anything about moving him...

how about D.Lee for Peavy? Lee is past his prime and a lot of money is spent on him. Not to mention Hoffpauir up and coming with a big bat! Lee was a Padre at one time anyway. Peavy would complete the best rotation in baseball in years!

Adrian Gonzalez?

lee makes more money than peavy does... that's the whole reason they want to move him

Portz and Scribble. Im glad you agree with me on this one. Theres no bigger trade rumor than this one that is why it is constantly talked about. And since there were already talks about these two teams (cubs and pads) its very easy for them to resurface. And once again Marshall is not CC Sabathia. I like his role but if he needed to be gone to make a trade FINALLY happen. Adios Sean. Maybe we can just send the pads his twin brother and they wont notice...

Yeah Adrian Gonzalez is a lock at first base for the Padres. So that would make no sense to send our NUMBER TWO hitter (hopefully) over there.

Henry

what do you think the lineup will look like?

1 Sori
2 Lee
3 Aram
4 Bradley
5 Soto
6 Fuku
7 Theriot
8 Font

"how about D.Lee for Peavy? Lee is past his prime and a lot of money is spent on him. Not to mention Hoffpauir up and coming with a big bat! Lee was a Padre at one time anyway."

Ha..

Ha..

Eh.. sad..

"Adrian Gonzalez?"

If you're saying the Cubs should try and get him, then I say I wish, but it's not happening.

Why don't we just go after Markakis while we're at it too?

Gonzalez is a great hitter and a plus glove at first, and he's the type of cornerstone player you build around. If the Padres don't get any closer to contention while Gonzalez is closing in on FA, then they'll consider dealing him, but I just think it's too early.

For the hell of it though:

Peavy and Gonzalez for Lee, Vitters, Marshall, Colvin,

I literally can't do it.

There's no plausible Peavy/Gonzalez deal that wouldn't hurt the ML team.

How about:

Lee, Soto, Marshall, Flaherty, Hart, Pie, and Stevens for those two?

Too bad I would NEVER deal Soto. Not yet at least. Not unless the deal is a joke. Like Soto for Hanley.

yes magic...lets enforce the stereotype of badly proposed trades by cubbies fans..why would they take a suddenly aging lee, when they have gonzo at first, for their best player??and add on salary...Lee is not past his prime and is still a great hitter, just not a number 3 anymore, I think that should be A-Ram

Agreed Portz. Sorry.. I read 2 posts and wanted to address them but I didnt put the other persons name in. I agree that unless we get roberts which is possible but doubtful, Sori is the 1 hole.

And saying Lee was a Padre anyway is almost like saying Josh Hamilton was a Cub. He played there for like 6 minutes.

I like the lineup. DLee if you really look at it should have never been a 3 slot hitter. Besides 2005. If he can cut the GDPs down this year from last year he would be a perfect 2 hole. Never hurts to have your two hitter that can generate some pop every once in a while. I said it before people were all over him for having a bad year. He didnt have a bad year last year he just didnt have a great year for a 3 hole hitter. Power numbers were down but that would go unnoticed if he was batting 2 or possibly 5. So we will see what Lou decides to do.

why would the cubs get roberts?
i mean id love it if they did but then theyd be loaded at 2nd base and they would have signed aaron miles for absolutely no reason. itd be a waste of money for a team that doesnt have a lot of money left to spend. and if they got roberts, id rather see fontenot be the backup not miles. or could they just release miles and not pay him??

"I think Soriano suffers from Manny-itis. He plays when we wants to."

CubCrazy, I get what you're saying but I think the distinction between the two is that Manny plays for money and Soriano plays because he likes hitting home runs. I don't really think Soriano takes time off because he doesn't feel like playing that day. iirc Soriano has come back earlier than expected from his injuries. Basically, his style is dictated by flash on the field, Manny's style is dictated by what he earns from being on the field.

Chris, no they can't release Miles without paying him since he was signed as a free agent. He's theirs for at least the next three months as I don't think a player can be traded within three months of signing a contract.

Soriano isnt the showcase type. are you kidding me? he runs everything out 100%. if he hits one off the wall you better bet that hes flying out of the box to get that double no matter what.

"I think Soriano suffers from Manny-itis. He plays when we wants to."

Maybe hes just a tad overrated?

Chris-

Any Roberts deal would almost assuredly include Mike Fontenot, and Miles is more of a utility infielder anyways so he'll be fine.

FONTENOT OVER ROBERTS. 130+ games of fontenot will provide better numbers than 150+ of Roberts. The cubs should use all that trash they got from the DeRosa deal and trade for somebody, doesnt even have to be Peavy. Cubs need to keep Marshall in that long relief role for when Rich Harden's arm falls off after 4 innings.

Sorry but Lee I dont think should be a # 2 hitter. For 2 reasons. He cant bunt. And why waste his stick there. I see him in the 5 hole.

My guess and this is only a guess. With Fukudome in the lineup.

Sori
The-Riot
A-Ram
Bradley
Lee
Soto
Fukudome (Possibly in the 2 hole because he can bunt well and can take a walk)
Fontenot

With Johnson in the line up

Sori
Johnson
A-Ram
Bradley
Lee
Soto
Theriot
Fontenot

Again this is just my guess... I have no Idea...

I agree with Scribbletone, any deal for Roberts will include Fontenot.

Lets hope it dosent happen. Riot/Font woohoo...

Yeah I am psyched to see what Fonts can do in a starter role. love that little bastard.

Yeah I guess im a dummy for not thinking about the bunting aspect. Well done worthy adversary. Great coach I would be..pfffff

LoL, anyone else glad that the Cubs rumors are no longer involving Mark Teahan?

Seriously are we discussing the Cubs getting Adrien Gonzalez? Really? Shameful if it is. Lets just send Cedeno, Pie, and Hill to the Rangers for Hamilton.. he would solidify CF and could bat 3rd... he gets along well with Bradley too..

Jeez...

Or was that just to shoot down Lee to the Padres deal...

Even if Gonzo wasnt there, why would the Pads want Lee? they are trying to dump payroll.

No worries Henry, I actually thought of lee there too but then thought about what would happen if it was late in a game and soriano didnt strike out. (sorry cheap shot at Sori)

I agree. Font/Riot. I am love little gritty players like those two. And no I have no affiliation with LSU baseball. :-)

Please someone talk me down.. I am actually starting to get excited for the season.. Last time I was this excited was 2003.. we all know how that ended.

I guess 5 outs away from the Series is much better than the last 2 years.

Im always anxious for the baseball season to start. Im gonna like what the cubs put out there. Even if it was today. I think Lou will mix the lineup a bit. Id like to see ARam in that 3rd spot. Loving the rotation even though the 5 slot is still up in there air. If Dempster can have a year like last year and Hardens arm doesnt blow up. They should dominate the best division in baseball. Oh wait, the Central is god awful. So it should be easy.....right?

Wow. This thread has really gotten off track of reality.

Adrian Gonzalez is going no where.

Talking about who would bat second, I have heard Lou say a few times that he loves Theriot batting #2. Cuz he hits to the opposite field. Thats why he doesnt want him batting leadoff. He can bunt he hustles and wont hit in to too many double plays.

True that.

Yeah. One person just randomly threw out the Adrian Gonzalez thing out there and pretty much everyone else told him that it was a dumb comment. I dont blame the whole thread and participants

I am excited to see how Fontenot does this year starting at 2nd, but if we had a chance to get Roberts to lead off, then you cant give up that chance. You would have to choose Roberts, but I only make a trade if you can extend him to 3 years maybe?

If we can add Peavy or Roberts then I say this was a great offseason.

Well, so far the net net of all the offseason moves Hendry has made is that the team is worse than when we ended the season
- Starters - worse
- Bullpen - worse
- Offense - even at best (if Bradley is as productive as DeRosa)
- Bench - worse (losing Edmonds, Fontenot now starting)

He was quoted as saying "this will all make sense before the season starts" I hope he is right.

How did the starters get worse? Marquis is gone and they are worse? yikes. Apparently we have Miss Cleo on our hands. Why dont we wait and see how the season starts off or at least spring training before we start saying they are worse. come on now Ernie

oh yeah and at least we will have a consistent 2nd baseman instead of a platoon of 27 different people. Even if what you say is true that the cubs are worse that still makes them the best team in the division. But you gotta watch out for those pesky Pirates :S

Banks you're an idiot

Starters got worse?!? you know nothing about chicago cubs baseball. I am a better pitcher than Jason Marquis and i haven't pitched a game in my life.

Zambrano
Dempster
Lilly
Harden
Marshall? (I sure hope not)

Obviously i agree that the starters did not get worse. but you gotta remember Marshall would be a 5th starter. Your 5th starter does not have to win you 15-20 games. hes got give the other 4 starters rest between starts and not be completely god awful. which marshall has done nothing to prove that he is awful and to me is maturing as a pitcher as the seasons have gone on. Im up for someone else to fill the 5th spot but im also alright with Marshall.

I threw Gozo out there, but the Roberts talk is about the same thing...going no where.

When the new owners take over, then we'll see about a possible 5th starter pick up. Right now, it's in house. As for Edmonds, he gave what he had and was a nice pick up off the scrap heap. I am glad he helped and glad he was not brought back.

The Cubs say they would rather Marshall be the swing man from the pen more than #5

Which isnt a bad idea at all. Just in case. Z gets cramps. Hardens right arms ends up at the backstop. Someones getting rocked. Once again lets hope good ole Jimmy boy isnt done dealing and makes a move that makes Cubs not go hmmmmmm

I think they're going to add a fifth starter before all is said and done.

I really have no idea who they could target if it's not Peavy, Wolf or Pettitte, though.

Does anyone know what kinds of decent pitchers are available at this time? Most teams aren't out dealing pitching at this time.

Personally, I think they should just go after Pettitte. I've said this a million times, but his peripheral stats indicate he's better than his 2008 performance, and a move to the NL and a better defense could really help him.

A rotation of Zambrano, Dempster, Pettitte, Harden and Lilly is very, very good.

I've just gotten to the point where I just can't imagine them getting Peavy.

You know I really wounldnt mind Guzman as that #5 starter. I was at the game that he started to end the regular season against the Brewers when they had their back against the wall. He had like 4 strike outs in 2 innings with one hit and no walks I believe. He did look pretty good.

Guzman our #5 and then we go after Roberts and Sherrill? Maybe we could get that done without Vitters.

Guzman is/was a very solid pitcher. Just needed experience. He got hurt and recovered really well. Hopefully with some innings he turns out to be what the cubs expect of him. But the cubs have had some guys that they expect to do really well that kinda take a dump. Ill say 2 left handed CF. No names though.

I have been reading that Chris Ray might likely be the closer for the O's in '09 which means Baltimore might move Sherrill. He was paid just under $1 million in '08 not sure what it is for 2009. A Roberts and Sherrill deal could work.

What do you think?

"Guzman our #5 and then we go after Roberts and Sherrill? Maybe we could get that done without Vitters."

I like the idea, but that package would cost you Vitters..

Then again, for both of those guys, I'd probably be willing to let go of Vitters if we didn't give up like a ton more.

If we could do something like Vitters, Pie, Marshall, Stevens, Archer, Atkins and Tony Thomas for Roberts and Sherill, I'd be all for it.

Sherrill would give us a very good lefty set up man to match with Kevin Gregg, which would make getting to Marmol much easier. A bullpen of Marmol, Gregg, Sherrill, Samardzija, Guzman, Gaudin and Cotts is quite satisfactory.

I don't feel the need to once again go over what Roberts would do for Chicago's lineup.

Peavy could still happen. You can sit there and knitpick the Cubs package but ultimately if the Padres want to shed payroll and Peavy has a no-trade it can happen. If not Peavy, there is more than enough there to pick up a pretty good starter or very good reliever.

The Cubs are much better than spring training 2008 and, with one more move, better than the end of 2008. Folks, this isn't Roto: you can't have all righthand hitters and defense does matter.

Even without Peavy, name one NL team with a better hitting and/or better pitching. The answer: no one. This lineup and rotation rocks, and my guess is that the trio of Lee, Soriano and Fuk will have significantly better production than in 2008 when we scored the most runs in the NL. Plus most of our guys are signed past 2009.

See you in October and thank you Hendry for not settling for a team that will win the division and lose in the first or second rounds.

I see all these lineups being made but haven’t seen Fontenot thrown in the 2-hole... We all know how much Lou has asked for balance in the lineup and while we have a load of Right handed power, putting a lefty in #2 adds a great L/R combination.

Fontenot can bunt, pull the ball and hit screaming line drives to advance runners. He is also an above average base runner that hits for average and racks up extra base hits, all things that you want to see in you #2 hitter. Also Lou has praised Theriot in the #8 spot for his ability to get on base and turn the lineup over.

Barring a miraculous Roberts trade (I know, its never going to happen), if I were Uncle Lou, I would look at something like this…

Soriano
Fontenot
Ramirez
Bradley
Lee
Soto
Fukudome
Theriot

Let me know what you think…

So do Towers comments sound like he's still trying to trade Peavy? He says the Braves made an offer, but they wouldn't provide Escobar now since they don't have a backup at SS. He says that the Cubs were trying to acquire more players... are 3 fringe pitchers enough? Towers needs to just keep his mouth shut until something happens.

So do Towers comments sound like he's still trying to trade Peavy? He says the Braves made an offer, but they wouldn't provide Escobar now since they don't have a backup at SS. He says that the Cubs were trying to acquire more players... are 3 fringe pitchers enough? Towers needs to just keep his mouth shut until something happens.

the last line is one of the reasons he aint got a 44 jersey hangin up in the clubhouse at Turner Field

You know, this is too much drama to handle. One, the aftermath of losing probably our best player, DeRosa, is it really necessary to give up almost all of the major league talent we have. Vitters, okay, I can see parting with him, I don't want to, but okay. Hill, sure, he doesn't look like he has a chance at getting back to the big leagues in the near future. Pie, he is a big question mark. Yea, he is not ready to hit, but that might be a very short time away from being changed. I know everyone is tired of waiting, but he is on the cusp of being there. Fontenot, I cannot fathom a reason to lose him. To be honest, I miles is more expendable than Fontenot. Cedeno is very much along the same lines. Last year was his best. He is now our best off the bench guy, in fact he is our new DeRosa. Marshall, No. He is our number five starter. Yea, he isn't a Cy Young Winner, but who needs to be as the number five starter. I would love to see Dempster, Harden, Peavy, Zambrano, Lilly for next year, but a year or two down the line, when we have this, and we need to drop one, who is it. Zambrano. Harden. Lilly. All I know, I think that we could keep Marshall, spend money and get a Darrel Ward type player, a back up to Derek Lee, and a good hitting back up catcher to back up Geo. Plus we still have the pieces in place to give everyone a day when they need one. I dunno... I'm not Jim Hendry, but I really don't think the Peavy trade is something the Cubs need right now.

Bleedcubbieblue
I like the lineup. I was thinking I would love to try Fukudome back in the #2 hole. We all know he can play like the guy we paid $12 mm/year to play. He is a great bunter, bats left, still has a good OBP. I would love to give him another shot. How about it?

Soriano
Fukudome
Ramirez
Bradley
Lee
Soto
Fontenot
Theriot


Anyone agree? Disagree?

Maybe Kevin Towers is a toddler or maybe he has the brain capacity of a toddler. Either way, he may be the dumbest person on the planet!

"Starters got worse?!? you know nothing about chicago cubs baseball. I am a better pitcher than Jason Marquis and i haven't pitched a game in my life."

Umm, Cory5713, you're wrong. Marquis had a 99 ERA+ last season. That means he was essentially league average. Who are you going to replace him with? Having your 5th starter be league average is a pretty good deal. You Cubs fans may come to regret trading away Marquis if your 5th starter flops next season.

DodgerBruin
You may be right but we will take our chances if we can get rid of 5 mil in payroll.

We have 4 other great pitchers in the rotation. We might trade for someone or we have at least 4 other very acceptable in-house candidates for the 5th starter spot. So like I said I guess we will take our chances. Hope we dont regret it in the end

bleedcubbieblue and uww1

I have a feeling it would be more something like this:

Soriano
Theriot
Bradley
Ramirez
Lee
Soto
Fontenot
Fukudome

I think you leave Ramirez in the four spot where he has hit well and has been the best clutch hitter on the team for the last 2-3 years. Also you still want someone that can go from first to third in the three hole so a fleeter Bradley fits there best. Also his OBP would give Ramirex even more chances to drive in runs. I could actually even see moving Fontenot up a spot to gain a little more balance but my main point was having Bradley in the three hole.

I think the key to the whole Peavy trade will be what Towers was talking about when he said a proposal from the Cubs would "fill several holes." I think he likes the players he would get from the Cubs and the versatility a rebuilding team needs. Guys that would fit that would be Cedeno (anywhere on the IF) and even Hart (starter or power arm in the BP). When you only have 40 million to spend and half of it is going to 4 guys you need to have guys elsewhere that can fill more than one hole. Also getting Vitters would give him the quality aspect also. I am about 90% sure that Marshall would not be included in any deal for Peavy. The whole point of getting another arm would be to get Marshall back into his swing-man role. Giving him up while getting another arm would be without purpose.

Ya any of those look ok, I guess it will be up to Lou not us. Although sometimes I think I could do better then Big Lou :) LOL We all have good points though. We will just have to see what happens. Maybe Hendry isnt done yet.

I hope Kevin Towers trades Jake Peavy to another dimension. That way we would never have to hear about who he's being traded to, then who he's not being traded to. If a trade was happening, it would have already been done.

uww1,

It's not about you removing $5M from your salary. I understand that Marquis was overpaid. But the issue all you Cubs fans keep talking about is how horrible Marquis pitched. And then you guys talk about replacing him with Pettitte or Garland, 2 pitchers who pitched WORSE than Marquis last season.
I just don't understand the extreme hatred of Marquis. He has provided exactly what he was supposed to when he signed.

Uww and Masciob... I can see both of your points. My main point was wanting to see Fontenot in the #2 spot but then again, if(and it's a big if) Fukudome can swing the bat like he did in the first half of '08 then he would be a good #2 cantidate as well. To completely contradict myself, I do love Ramirez as the cleanup hitter and really don't forsee Lou changing that, however for the sake of balance, I made the Bradley/Ramirez switch. Masciob, you hit it on the head. Ramirez is much btter suited for cleanup and Bradley at 3 or 5. Either way you look at it, these are good problems to have.

I am hoping Hendry isn't done but I am not exactly hoping his other move is Peavy. We do need another arm though. I trust in Jim Hendry.

Well you see that "MOST" of us didnt say he was horrible. I would be satified with him personally. I didnt like his attitude last year in spring training and that is what turns me off. He was overpaid and that is why I was hoping to trade him, and maybe a chance for Peavy. But was was just what we were looking for and the people that understand baseball and have watched him pitch I think realize that. If we dont trade for Peavy then I would be happy staying in-house and using any one of the 4 other guys that are capable of starting.

If we do not add another well above average arm to the rotation, I do not like the Marquis trade. I understand that we need to clear payroll, but it didn't seem to be a necesity to clear payroll for Bradley. Marshall is much to valuable as a swing man to put in the rotation and therefore I believe that there is still something in the works to add another starter. You just don't go trading away an above average 5th starter to gain 5MM in payroll space, just doesn't make sense. Hendry has to have something up his sleeve.

I completely agree about Marquis' attitude early last year. I really hate it when a guy demands that he only do a certain thing or else. You need to earn what you want. And sometimes that doesn't work out, for example, DeRosa originally signed to be the regular 2B but he became the SUPER SUPER SUPER utility starter and even when his play should have earned him what he wanted he knew doing his role would help the team win more games. That is the big reason I was sorry to see DeRo go.

This is kind of off subject but I thought it was kind of funny: I got a Cubs monthly calendar for Christmas and they have a player for each month. By my figuring three of them may not be Cubs this year (Derosa, Pie, Hill).

I know this thread is about Jake Peavy, but did anyone see the espn report about Smoltz going to the Red Sox? What the hell has Wern being doing, you all want to blame Towers.

Besides, you guys need to read the article in question before commenting. It doesn't say that a deal is being discussed it says it was discussed. Meaning it was confirming what we all know, that the Cubs and Padres could not agree on a deal.

Again, please quit sending reporters, text messages, e-mails, letters, telegraphs, or whatever to Kevin Towers. Just trade Peavy or not, but quit talking about it! I hope a black hole sucks KT and Jake Peavy into it, so we don't have to hear about what they may or may not do.

Uwwi, I hope Fukudome is hitting in high in the order. He is such a key this year to turn last year's second half into a fluke...hopefully.

Masciob has it right if Fukudome tanks. Lou won't have much patience with him. If he sputters, he will hit 8th or get less playing time. Let's hope he does well.

"I just don't understand the extreme hatred of Marquis. He has provided exactly what he was supposed to when he signed."

No hatred here. His attitude was more 'me first', but he did his job last year for the most part.

Airman, I did not see about Smoltz and Boston. Interesting.

Peavy and Chris Young to the Braves

Jair, Gorkys, Locke, Melden, and Prado

Hey bravesbacker. do you not like KT or Peavy talks? its hard to tell. beat it and dont read it if you have such a problem. no need in posting the same comment in different words every two seconds

"Peavy and Chris Young to the Braves

Jair, Gorkys, Locke, Melden, and Prado"

No.

I'm not going to talk about how f-ucking dumba.ss that trade is.

Jair could very, very easily outperform both Peavy and CY. Actually, the difference between Jair and Peavy is pretty damn slim, if you think of it.

The only reason I'm up at this hour is because I couldn't sleep last night, so I'm really not in the mood to back this up with numbers. But I can, and I might later if I get flamed enough.

Jay Jackson couldn't be included in a trade until June, because he's a 2007 draft that has to wait for one yr to be traded, he could possibly be included as a (tba)and then traded this June.

DodgersBruin-

Marquis did not pitch better than Pettitte last season.

Pettitte had a higher K rate, lower walk rate, and gave up basically the same OPS+ despite pitching in the AL East behind a poor defense. Marquis just did a better job of keeping the ball in the park. Otherwise, Pettitte is definitely a better pitcher, and I think he bounces back some in 2009.

"

Umm, Cory5713, you're wrong. Marquis had a 99 ERA+ last season. That means he was essentially league average. Who are you going to replace him with? Having your 5th starter be league average is a pretty good deal. You Cubs fans may come to regret trading away Marquis if your 5th starter flops next season."

Great, Marquis had an ERA+ of 99, making him one of the better 5th starters in the game. He also was going to make 10M this year. Sean Marshall, who you all seem to undervalue, has had an ERA+ of 119 and 116 the last two years. He's had a rising K rate, declining BB rate, and a declining WHIP each year he has pitched. Is he a phenominal pitcher? No. Will he continue to post an ERA+ near 120 as a full time starter? Probably not, but he's the fifth starter! You can push him to long relief in the playoffs and never need to use him to start. You are all acting like our fifth starter will open game 1 of the NLDS if we make it, let's all calm down.

Also, Marshall is 26 and makes 10% of Marquis salary. How is that worse??

Scribble, I agree that I think Petitte will bounce back in 2009, but more because of a chip on his shoulder than anything else. If he can be had on a fair deal, I wouldn't mind seeing him for a year.

"Jair could very, very easily outperform both Peavy and CY."

Normally I really value your opinions, you have some great insight. Here, you are clearly overvaluing JJ. He is a phenominal young pitcher, but Peavy, if he stays healthy (no reason to think he wont, contrary to all the self made MDs around these parts), is definitely better.

JJ is too young, unproven to hold back from getting Peavy if that's what it takes. Since he was 23 Peavy has posted ERA+ of 171, 159, 134, 134 and an offyear of 99 as his five years of starting.

JJ posted an ERA + of 116. He had a higher WHIP than Peavy's worst full season pitching, and I could go on, but as I said, not important. JJ could be neck and neck with Peavy eventually, but he isn't at this point, and wont be next year. This is all opinion... we'd have to look back in 5 years to decide, but the evidence is not in JJ's favor at this point.

At this point the Cubs must go out and trade for Jake Peavy! The departure of Mark Derosa has most likely left not only Derosa, but much of the clubhouse at a loss for words. I think that the only thing keeping these Cubbie players satisfied is the thought of adding Jake Peavy to the starting rotation. If Hendry doesn't get Jake Peavy, there might be some resentment for Hendry in the clubhouse.

This being said, I don't think a deal will be done for the start of Spring Training. With the ownership situation on both sides, who knows how much the Cubs want to spend and how much the Padres will end up wanting Peavy. I think that we sit on the Peavy talks until Hendry gives more info.

Batting Lineup:
1. Soriano
2. Theriot
3. Bradley
4. Ramirez
5. Lee
6. Fontenot
7. Soto
8. Fukudome
9. Pitcher

I would like to see Fukudome moved up to the top of the lineup until he fails to produce... Maybe swop Fuku and Theriot for opening day...

I doubt that players will be mad that Hendry has built a team that should win 92+ games on paper.

"Scribble, I agree that I think Petitte will bounce back in 2009, but more because of a chip on his shoulder than anything else. If he can be had on a fair deal, I wouldn't mind seeing him for a year."

See, but the thing is that Pettitte wasn't nearly as bad as everyone thinks.

In 2008, he posted a very solid 6.97 K/9, while also walking only 2.43 (his lowest walk rate since 2005).

His FIP was lower (3.71) than it was in both 2006 and 2007, and his GB rate was the best it's been since 2004.

Andy Pettitte was undervalued in 2008, because the defense behind him was poor and he ran into some bad luck.

He's still a very solid #3 starter, and I really think he'd be a great addition to the Cubs.

Soriano
Fontenot
Lee
Ramirez
Bradley
Soto
Fukudome
Theriot

Soriano
Theriot
Lee
Ramirez
Bradley
Soto
Johnson
Miles

The Cubs need to forget about the Peavy Deal and go for John Garland; he knows how to win...He won in the playoffs and the World Series...Yes he is in the American League which gives him an advantage in the National league...The hitters in the NL are not as familiar with him and he will no longer have to face DHs instead facing pitchers.. This would be a perfect pickup...

The Cubs should now go get Brian Roberts..That would give them a legitimate second baseman. Instead of a utility guy..

The loss of Derosa was huge..He was one of the only playoff performers...If Hendry does not make something happen this season then he needs to be gone next year.

Rob,

I guess you forgot abour Derosa's double play ground out in game 3 of 2007 NLDS against D-backs. One homerun in 6 playoff games harldly counts as a "playoff performer." There was just simply too many RH bats in the lineup. As such, the Dodgers didn't even use a LH pitcher in the entire '08 NLDS, albeit a short series. Also, I guess you forgot about DeRosa's error of a sure-fire double play in the '08 NLDS, game 2 that would of got the Cubs out of the inning before the game was broken wide open. Wake up and smell the coffee. Don't worry you are not alone in your love for DeRosa. Simply put, the roster was not properly balanced to counter good pitching, an, thus, not good enough to win in the playoffs. Something had to be done.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.