![]() |
|
|
| |
« Braves Rumors: Pettitte, Glavine, Smoltz | Main | Nationals Sign Wil Ledezma »
10:20pm: Newsday's Ken Davidoff learned tonight that the Mets "do not intend to raise their three-year, $36MM offer to [Lowe] at this time." The Mets don't feel that they have serious competition for Lowe, for some reason. Oliver Perez and Randy Wolf remain the alternatives.
8:28am: According to Kat O'Brien of Newsday, "negotiations are expected to heat up for righthander Derek Lowe" this week for the Mets, who reportedly offered three years and $36MM (though Scott Boras indicated yesterday the proposal was never made). Jon Heyman said recently that Lowe didn't take this offer seriously; he's aiming for a $16MM salary. Heyman named the Phillies, Braves, Red Sox, Brewers, and Angels as possible suitors, with the last three more on the speculative side.
Mark Bowman doesn't believe the Braves are willing to top the Mets' reported offer, though. In another article, Bowman suggested Jon Garland and Andy Pettitte are more likely options.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536aab90e970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Derek Lowe Rumors: Monday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Here's how this will play out.
The Braves aren't willing to pony up the dough. The price is going up, not down.
The Phillies and Red Sox only has a passing interest. The Angels have even less interest than that.
That leaves the Mets as the only serious contender, and would cave if they need to. Unfortunately, without a bidding partner, Lowe won't get his $16M per year, and the Mets won't get him for $12M.
Somewhere in the middle. And he'll be a great fit for the Mets.
Posted by: Boh | January 05, 2009 at 08:32 AM
Brewers are likely at about the Angels level, but they sound like they could become serious in this on second thought. (Okay, first thought.)
Posted by: Boh | January 05, 2009 at 08:33 AM
At the end of the day, I still think the Mets will get him for somewhere around 4yrs $14mil per yr.
Posted by: kerelcooper | January 05, 2009 at 08:36 AM
if the phillys take him they have to really juggle and keep a few guys in AAA..is it worth the money ???? i saw let him be another teams adam eaton....hes goood but im fine with our starting lineup...4 years to a 36year old guy is alot...but we just gave 2 years to a 46 year old so i cant really say anything lol
Posted by: Fenton from Philly | January 05, 2009 at 08:43 AM
Why would the Braves willing to through $$ to Burnett but not to Lowe? Lowe will give you the 200+ innings and have shot every 5th day to be in the ball game to win. What else you want for a guy who is the top FA SP on the market. Something stinks unless FW has a Trade lined up for a Grienke Type. I would more worried about Burnetts getting injuried than Lowe age. He has been a work horse which on the current market is the best option Atl can and should lock down now.
Posted by: BravoFan3736 | January 05, 2009 at 08:49 AM
Oh I see possible suitors, wow I can do this job.
Manny to NY Yankees, Mets, Angels, Giants as possible suitors.
Where do I apply?
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 05, 2009 at 08:51 AM
Braves or Mets. Simple.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 05, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Pettite will sign with the Yankees. Who in their right mind would offer him over $10MM? He's lost velocity, he got abused by right handed hitters last year to the tune of a .325 batting average allowing 16 homeruns to rightys. I wouldn't even have this guy in my rotation at this point if I had a choice. I'd suggest a move to the pen as a lefty specialist for Pettite as those numbers remained nice as he allowed only a .203 batting avg with 3 homeruns.
1 year: $5MM would be the top offer I could see him getting.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 05, 2009 at 08:55 AM
There's a HUGE difference between Lowe and Adam Eaton. To begin with, one has actually been good while the other has never actually been good.
And, I agree. Lowe is much less of a risk than Burnett. Braves should definitely target Lowe, and bid well on him. It's a win-win situation for ATL. Either they get Lowe or they raise the price for the Mets.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 05, 2009 at 08:56 AM
"Oh I see possible suitors, wow I can do this job.
Manny to NY Yankees, Mets, Angels, Giants as possible suitors.
Where do I apply?"
Mets ownership said no Manny, and Angels have ruled it out.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 05, 2009 at 08:56 AM
I don't get the decision by Atlanta to offer so much to Burnett but not nearly as much to Lowe.
I get that the Braves want an ace, because they really don't have anything but potential 2/3's (Jurrjens, Vazquez). Burnett definitely could have been that ace, but he was also a huge risk. Lowe probably won't be more than a good 2/3 either, but he's more likely to maintain that level for the duration of a long term deal.
How could you offer Burnett a 5/80 deal, then offer Lowe 3/36?
If Atlanta can afford to spend $80M on a pitcher like A.J., then why not at least fork up 3/48 or 4/56 for Lowe.
A rotation of Lowe, Jurrjens, Vazquez, Campillo and Morton/Smolts/Glavine/Reyes is still pretty good, even if there is no lockdown ace to hold it all together.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 08:58 AM
Why does Mark Bowman think that the Braves won't go over the 3/36 the Met's offered? Just don't understand when $$ has been thrown around unless this postering by the Braves. Just there is such a GREAT need for a #1/2 Type for the Braves that you would think they wouldn't mess around and just sign the guy to a 3/45.
Posted by: BravoFan3736 | January 05, 2009 at 09:03 AM
scribbletone: its the Yankees. Many deals they make don't make sense. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 05, 2009 at 09:03 AM
I think that maybe we should start gettin serious on Lowe.Jon Garland?!!? Pay Lowe 3yr/45 million with a vestin option for 4th.
Posted by: Bravesfan10 | January 05, 2009 at 09:04 AM
I love Lowe. I want him back in Boston. But 3/45 is ridiculous for a sinker ball pitcher, especially one at Lowe's age. 3/36 is more than fair. You can't base other players contracts of contracts that are created by the Yankees. If we did that then Youkilis should get signed to a 8/$181MM too just because he put up similar number to Teixeira last season... Nope. Not gonna happen.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 05, 2009 at 09:11 AM
this is ridiculous!
the Mets made an offer, 3 years $36 MIL. as weve seen Lowe rejected that offer.
Question- who else is bidding for Lowe?
Answer- nobody!
so why are the Mets going to now increase their offer with serious negotiating?
the Mets have said they have other options. why should they bid against themselves?
if Lowe wants to wait for a higher bid, thats fine.. but the Mets should just sit back and wait for another team to bid against them. if another team is willing to go more than $12 MIL, THEN the Mets can increase their offer.
is Lowe really going to have his feeling shurt of no other team offers more than the $12 MIL the Mets offered? poor guy, maybe he can just sit on his ass next season and get nothing.
are the Mets that desperate to get Lowe they increase their own offer when nobody else is interested for $12+ MIL??
Posted by: SpecialFNK | January 05, 2009 at 09:18 AM
couldn't agree with you more special. but i think omar's concern is that his ego WILL be hurt and if he receives an offer that he likes, he may not come back to the mets and ask them to up their offer. The Mets can't afford to lose out on Lowe. Wolf is nowhere near as good.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 05, 2009 at 09:26 AM
I really think andy needs to move on. he is merely a 1st half pitcher.
Posted by: Voip Affiliate | January 05, 2009 at 09:35 AM
Buster Olney's offseason pieces have been much about nothing except for the Lowe point which he was dead on about...Had he lowered his asking price when the Yanks were still interested, he would have gotten the 45 or whatever he wanted. Hes a selfish bum I dont mind players going for the money when its there, but its not there Derek, if I was the Mets I wouldnt go any higher until there was sign they had to and I dont see that happening.
Posted by: Joba | January 05, 2009 at 09:46 AM
i love holecamels
Posted by: HoleCamels | January 05, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Im going to go out on limb on this, I say Braves make a move this week, on Lowe. I say they get this done.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 05, 2009 at 10:11 AM
I think Pettitte isn't getting enough credit here.
The guy posted reasonable 14-14, 4.54 ERA numbers last season, while pitching in front of a poor defense in the AL East.
Considering his peripheral stats were still pretty good, I think Pettitte on 1/8 or 1/10 is reasonable.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Boy, if Wren can't sign Lowe and thinks Garland is the alternative, then this team will truly suck in 2009.
I see no justification spending the money that Garland will command when there's a Braden Looper or a Randy Wolf out there who will give you better production for fewer years and less money.
Makes as much sense to send Morton and JoJo out there to take their lumps and mature.
At least the kids have upside. Signing Garland is hoisting the white flag.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 05, 2009 at 10:29 AM
I may be way off here, but I think the Braves are avoiding Lowe because of his agent. The Braves have never gone really gone after Boras clients. Maddux worked his own deal when he was with the Braves and so did A Jones. I dont recall why the Braves avoid Boras clients, but it started when Schuerholtz was the GM.
Posted by: David | January 05, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Fenton, you should be banned from this site. You just compared Derek Lowe to Adam Eaton. He has a career ERA of 3.75 and WHIP of 1.268. Yes he's getting older, but he hasn't pitched fewer than 182 innings in a season in 7 consecutive seasons. I REALLY wish the Phils would pay up on this one. Yes, their payroll is going to be incredibly high, but they're in the 4th biggest payroll, just won the world series, and will most likely sell out 90% of their games this season. Hamels, Lowe, Myers, Moyer, Blanton? That's one hell of a rotation.
Posted by: scottgrahamcm | January 05, 2009 at 11:04 AM
4th biggest market*
Posted by: scottgrahamcm | January 05, 2009 at 11:05 AM
"Hamels, Lowe, Myers, Moyer, Blanton? That's one hell of a rotation."
Obviously I don't KNOW this information, but I would expect that the Phillies resigning Moyer will seriously impact their ability to make a quality bid for Lowe.
Giving Moyer 2/14 was really a dumb move in my opinion.
The guy is a fine pitcher, and that contract isn't really awful, but now it's not clear that the Phillies will have the cash to add Lowe.
Had they not resigned Moyer, they likely could've easily have signed Lowe at what his prospective price appears to be.
A rotation of Hamels, Lowe, Myers, Blanton and Happ is very, very good.
My other big issue with the Moyer signing is that this rotation may be in trouble after 2009.
Myers hits free agency, Moyer will be 47, and Blanton will be closing in on FA as well.
Adding Lowe would've given them another mainstay for the rotation with Hamels, and would've made it much easier to land pitching, rather than try to replace Myers next winter when the free agent market is far worse than this season.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 11:14 AM
The Phillies REALLY resigned the wrong key player.
They SHOULD have resigned Burrell (adding the draft pick) and then signed Lowe.
Instead they let Burrell walk, lose a draft pick by signing Ibanez, and don't make the upgrade to the rotation by adding Lowe.
Obviously the market this year has been a little tough to predict, but still, if I was a Phillies fan I'd be disappointed with this offseason.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Sure I'd like to see the Braves add another pitcher, but, again, $16 mil per season for 4 years is too much for Lowe. How bout 2/$30 mil? If not, see ya.
Like someone else mentioned, Looper's still an option as well as trades with S.F. & others. Wren's gonna have to get creative though.
Posted by: drphonic7 | January 05, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Holy crap... the Phils gave Moyer 2 /$14 million? They lost there mind after winning the WS? Guy is 47 years old- who else is going to want him? He shoulda been signed for 1/ $2 million if that.
Posted by: optionn | January 05, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Moyer won 15 games with a sub-4 ERA last year at 46. What makes everyone assume he's going to "break down" The guy only throws 80mph and still deals. 7 million is a bargain for a guy with those numbers, the Phils won't go after Lowe because of all of the Arb cases they're facing.
Posted by: heis27 | January 05, 2009 at 12:35 PM
"Moyer won 15 games with a sub-4 ERA last year at 46. What makes everyone assume he's going to "break down" The guy only throws 80mph and still deals. 7 million is a bargain for a guy with those numbers, the Phils won't go after Lowe because of all of the Arb cases they're facing."
My problem with the signing isn't necessarily Moyer. As I previously said, Moyer is a fine pitcher and that deal isn't awful.
My problem is that signing Moyer likely will prevent the Phillies from signing Lowe, a better, younger pitcher that would've been a clear upgrade over Moyer.
They could've probably gotten Lowe for 4/52, but instead they'll pay Moyer 2/14 and then hope they can fill that hole later.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 12:51 PM
i only compare to singing a player and not want to get burned like we did with eaton....we still have to pay this clown 9 mill this year...trust me i hated adam eaton from day 1 and never understood the singinig...i would love to have lowe, this phils can at least bid to just raise the price for the mets, we may need to sign lowe this year and then use myers are trade bait at some point
Posted by: Fenton from Philly | January 05, 2009 at 01:11 PM
What the hell are you talking about?
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 05, 2009 at 01:24 PM
before the braves sign someone like garland or trade for someone like Vicente Padilla i hope they inquire with the mariners about some of their young pitching.
Ryan Rowland Smith and Brandon Morrow specifically
Posted by: drumzalicious | January 05, 2009 at 01:29 PM
Brandon Morrow isn't going anywhere.
His arm is straight up electric, and he appeared to show some big improvement while starting in Seattle at the end of 2008.
King Felix and Morrow are basically all Seattle has..
Posted by: scribbletone | January 05, 2009 at 02:18 PM
what about ryan rowland smith?
Posted by: drumzalicious | January 05, 2009 at 03:36 PM
Pettite, Lowe, Smoltz, and Bobby Abreu for the Braves. Thatd be a dream scenario
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | January 05, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Lowe is going to the Mets. This is almost as inevitable as K-Rod going to the Mets. The Phillies have already signed several players, so they're pretty much out. The Braves could be in it (although many reports do say that they don't like the price), but if it's a bidding war over a 35 year old pitcher, the Mets will win (I do hate signing these old players, but there are no good young durable pitchers for us to sign). I hope to god though, that Lowe stays healthy for us. It feels like every old player the Mets sign fall into their decline very fast (Pedro, Delgado (pray for a resurgence), Lo Duca, Alomar, and there's probably more but I'm too young to remember).
Omar Minaya is doing the right thing by starting the negotiations low - he wants Lowe to settle for 14-15 million a year.
Posted by: qqqqqqqq | January 05, 2009 at 05:01 PM
*According to Kat O'Brien of Newsday, "negotiations are expected to heat up for righthander Derek Lowe" this week for the Mets, who reportedly offered three years and $36MM (though Scott Boras indicated yesterday the proposal was never made).*
Looks like Scotty is trying his hardest to save face with the Mets knowuing thats the avenue he needs to get the best contract for his client. I think that Lowe to the Mets is inevitable. Especially considering the payroll increases the Phillies have next season. Atlanta is on the ropes with this one. I think they might just be too nervous to offer a big contract to Lowe with garunteed money and years because the Mets might back out and they are footing the bill on a plan to make the Mets over pay. Then they are stuck with locked up money for years to come. Other teams could be sleepers, but I do think the Mets are the favorite to lock this one up.
Posted by: Butch | January 05, 2009 at 05:22 PM
I just wish the Mets would stop being soo cheap already.Letting Burrell sign w/ Rays 4 8 mil a yr.Now what the Mets need is a pitcher and a power hitting OF there are both of them in fa's LOWE AND MANNY. Sign them both cheapoooooooo.Then trade Church and Parnell to the Twins 4 D.YOUNG;
The Mets lineup would be;
Reyes
Beltran
Wright
Manny
Delgado
Young
Murphy
Catcher
Posted by: jvent | January 05, 2009 at 06:01 PM
"Ryan Rowland Smith and Brandon Morrow specifically"
Have you watched Morrow pitch? He has filthy stuff, If you wanted him it would most likely require Hanson/Schaffer(SP)
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 05, 2009 at 06:56 PM
Whoops Scribble Already let you in on that little secret
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 05, 2009 at 06:57 PM
Plain and simple Lowe wants to play For the Red Sox.
Posted by: Anthony | January 05, 2009 at 09:22 PM
no plain and simple he wants 60 million for 4 yrs not the red sox you guys think everyone wants to play for you then why couldnt you sign Text ?
Posted by: Mr. T The MeTro MaN | January 05, 2009 at 10:26 PM
everyone is knocking ibanez..what happens when he knocks in 140 this year..and whoever said moyer w 15 wins deserves 2 mil a year is smoking crack..he throws 80 idiot
Posted by: huey | January 06, 2009 at 01:57 AM
"everyone is knocking ibanez..what happens when he knocks in 140 this year.."
The same thing that is going to happen when Jose Reyes hits 38 HR's, steals 129 bases, bats .412, and throws 2 no hitters. Pigs will be flying, white guys will be stuffing on black dudes in the NBA, Danica Patrick will magically turn into a good race car driver, and the "nappy headed hoes" of the Rutgers womens basketball team will be featured on the cover of Victoria's Secret.
And by the way... the fact that Moyer throws 80 is relevant how in your statement that people who believe Moyer is only worth 2MM (which is indeed absurd) are "crack heads"?
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 06, 2009 at 07:45 AM
The plain and simple part is that Lowe has said that he would like to return to Boston to prove to all of the fans/ owners and team mates that he is a better person and pitcher than he was when he left before.
Posted by: Anthony | January 06, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Lowe said that to drag a big market team in, he just cares about money not where he pitches, if u don't see that already u never will
Posted by: Joba | January 06, 2009 at 08:51 AM
Yup. If he was so worried about playing in Boston, he would already be there. Obviously cash is the number 1 priority, you make that statement when you hire Scott Boras.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 06, 2009 at 09:07 AM