![]() |
|
|
| |
« Carl Pavano's Comments | Main | Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Red Sox, Yankees, Braves, M's, Cards, Mets, Manny »
Peter Gammons did a chat today with Boston Globe readers, and he discussed Boston's pursuit for a catcher.
The Red Sox "seem focused" on Arizona catcher Miguel Montero, with Jarrod Saltalamacchia remaining a possibility. The Red Sox so far will not give up Michael Bowden for Montero. Gammons notes the Sox made failed runs at Russell Martin and Mike Napoli.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536b7b2d1970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gammons: Red Sox Focused On Montero:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I've never seen Montero play. Any thoughts from those who have?
Posted by: Cinco Ocho | January 09, 2009 at 03:01 PM
I thought Martin was never even unofficially on the market? As for Montero... as long as he costs us only Daniel Bard I'd be fine with it.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 09, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Where would Montero rate in a group that includes the Texas duo - Salty and Teagarden?
Posted by: cmac1973 | January 09, 2009 at 03:05 PM
Montero's AAA numbers were great, albeit in the PCL. Otherwise, I have not seen him play.
I'll tell you what. . .a good a job as Boras did for CC and Tex, he screwed Varitek royally when he declined arbitration. With a divorce looming, I imagine that the $5-7 million he lost will matter.
Posted by: elguapo | January 09, 2009 at 03:08 PM
"I've never seen Montero play. Any thoughts from those who have?"
He's a big question mark and honestly, about equivalent to Salty. He's an offensive catcher with a high power ceiling, but he apparently makes a lot of mistakes behind the plate. He exhibited a solid bat in the minors, but it hasn't translated well to the majors yet, though he's yet to get a chance to really start, having played three backup seasons, primarily.
I don't know how his future as a catcher projects, but he's also almost three years older than Salty. Still wouldn't part with anything I wouldn't part with for Salty for him. I wouldn't give up Buchholz or Bowden for either.
Posted by: 0bsessions | January 09, 2009 at 03:10 PM
I doubt Arizona would even accept Bowden for Montero. But that's a nice spin from an ever-more transparent Gammons.
Posted by: AndrewYF | January 09, 2009 at 03:10 PM
I said it earlier and I'll say it again......Salty WANTS to go to Boston, epsecially if Vtek resings. He has spoken words of wanting to learn from him and work his butt off to be a good catcher. I think that is good for him to have the drive..give him a chance Theo. The Sox obviously can not fill the void with the minor league talent or Josh Bard so get 'er done!
Posted by: turnthe2 | January 09, 2009 at 03:10 PM
"Where would Montero rate in a group that includes the Texas duo - Salty and Teagarden?"
I'd put him flat in the middle. Not as much offensive potential as Saltalamacchia, but not nearly as good as Teagarden defensively.
Posted by: 0bsessions | January 09, 2009 at 03:11 PM
hes 25 years old which isnt too bad but from his recent call up he doesnt seem like he can hit too well?
Posted by: gmac | January 09, 2009 at 03:11 PM
"I thought Martin was never even unofficially on the market? As for Montero... as long as he costs us only Daniel Bard I'd be fine with it."
Heck, I'd throw in both Bards.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 03:12 PM
I do not believe Hanley Ramriez was on the market either and they asked about him.
Red Sox have enough depth to bring in a young star player.
Posted by: MikeClarke | January 09, 2009 at 03:15 PM
LANDON POWELL
Posted by: arly2380 | January 09, 2009 at 03:15 PM
"I said it earlier and I'll say it again......Salty WANTS to go to Boston, epsecially if Vtek resings"
There's the issue of the price tag though.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 09, 2009 at 03:16 PM
AndrewYF: "I doubt Arizona would even accept Bowden for Montero."
Hah! It wouldn't be a Sox catcher thread without Andrew around to tell us how worthless Sox prospects are.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 03:18 PM
Why doesn't Boston go after Shoppach? I don't get it.
I believe CLE would take a young SP for him.
Posted by: woyme | January 09, 2009 at 03:21 PM
If I was Theo and actually wanted Salty, I'd be planting rumors about somebody better than Montero. Maybe Ryan Doumit?
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Theo is a great General Manager, he must have played chest.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:22 PM
chess
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:22 PM
No chance on trading Bowden or Buch for a unproven cachting prospect. Top tier (and unproven, yes) starting pitchers are more valuable than likewise catchers and Theo & Co. is correct to nix any thoughts of this. Either of those prospects Bowden/Buch may be aces being held towards later in the season for some all of a suddenly available young hitter the Sox want and Bard + a Kottarras/Brown combo can handle it for 1 year, that or wait for Tek and Boras to crawl back for less than 2 million on a 1 year deal and THAT I am against also.. Picks are worth more than Tek.
Posted by: johns | January 09, 2009 at 03:22 PM
"Gammons notes the Sox made failed runs at Russell Martin and Mike Napoli."
I wonder how "making a run" is defined in the Gammons household. If this involved anything more than a polite "no" or lots of laughter when/if Theo called Colletti, then I'd be shocked.
Posted by: vtadave | January 09, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Stupid Sox gave him up, why doesnt anybody think Sox might have some good catchers. Varitek, who cares time to MOVE on.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:25 PM
woyme: "Why doesn't Boston go after Shoppach? I don't get it."
They know more about Shoppach than any catcher out there. Maybe they think he just had his career year. Also he strikes out a LOT. More than 1/3 of all at bats.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 03:26 PM
My 3 B's Bard, Bucholz and Bowden.
You Sox fans are going to be kissing Theo's feet in 2 years. They are good.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Littel Bear. He strikes out, but 21 HRs in 350 at bats is huge.
I know they know about Shopp. I know he was in their system. Just seems the price would be right and he's so much better than Montero.
Guess I'm just surprised I have his name where Boston's seasrch for a C is concerned.
Posted by: woyme | January 09, 2009 at 03:29 PM
"I'll tell you what. . .a good a job as Boras did for CC and Tex, he screwed Varitek royally when he declined arbitration. With a divorce looming, I imagine that the $5-7 million he lost will matter."
What if the divorce is the reason he declined arb? If this divorce is close to being finalized I'm sure that Tek would rather not sign until its final. She can't have what he doesnt have.
Posted by: Callahands | January 09, 2009 at 03:35 PM
woyme: "He strikes out, but 21 HRs in 350 at bats is huge."
Yeah, but every team with a catcher is going to be asking for the farm. I have to believe that Theo will stick with Varitek for another year before he'll trade the farm for a catcher who isn't THE catcher of the future. And I don't believe that Shoppach is that.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 03:35 PM
My 3 B's Bard, Bucholz and Bowden.
You Sox fans are going to be kissing Theo's feet in 2 years. They are good.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:29 PM
I still like Bowden better than Buchholz from what I've seen of Bowden. He just looks more intimidating on the mound. I haven't seen Bard pitch yet so I don't have any opinion on him, but I hear he can throw upper 90s with ease.
Posted by: Cinco Ocho | January 09, 2009 at 03:36 PM
Red Sox tried to get Ruseel Martin??
I'm a Sox fan and I love the way the FO manages things but really guys, you have to give up more than just Bard if you want players like that. Nothing like that will get done if you don't fork up Buccholz or Bowden. Not that I want them to go but just saying, Red Sox can't expect big deals to get done without giving up anything good.
Posted by: Umair | January 09, 2009 at 03:37 PM
Shappach's name has been mentioned in various reports this winter as one of the targets. My guess is Cleveland wants to hang on to him, since I can't see V-Mart as a full-timer behind the plate anymore, especially with room at first base.
Posted by: cmac1973 | January 09, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Ive see all pitch in AA, I love then all.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 03:41 PM
And my god, did you read that chat? There is without a doubt no one worse than Gammons when it comes to hiding your bias. He is HORRIBLE.
I also love the "Sox made a run at" comment. By what we've seen with the Hanley Ramirez rumor, this most likely translates into "Sox drew other teams to tears of laughter when they asked for".
Posted by: AndrewYF | January 09, 2009 at 03:42 PM
There is without a doubt no one worse than Gammons when it comes to hiding your bias. He is HORRIBLE.
Posted by: AndrewYF | January 09, 2009 at 03:42 PM
What's with these people who bash Gammons? The guy is literally a Hall of Famer sportswriter. There's been widespread speculation that he might be the next commissioner of baseball. He's a musician and a stroke survivor. Are the people who bash Gammons the same ones who adore Jim Rome?
Posted by: midtown | January 09, 2009 at 04:01 PM
"I also love the "Sox made a run at" comment. By what we've seen with the Hanley Ramirez rumor, this most likely translates into "Sox drew other teams to tears of laughter when they asked for"."
You never know what another team is going to say until you ask. I'm sure Theo didn't expect the Marlins to hand over Hanley or for the Angels or Dodgers to give up their catchers, but why not throw it out there? He's got a lot of young pitching prospects to offer in the right deal.
Posted by: cmac1973 | January 09, 2009 at 04:03 PM
You people cannot believe, how good Clay Bucholz is. The best in minors since, Clemens and I have seen him too, AA. Let me put it this way Clemens didn't throw as hard.
In person I saw them. AA Out of Texas U. went to NB Satdium won AA, championship. Check out his next 2 years. OK, but no problem. I am praying Bucholz shows how good he is, to my Sox Brothers and Sisters.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:04 PM
Murray Chass and Tracy Ringolsby are also "Hall of Fame" sportswriters.
Gammons was once a great sportswriter, no doubt, but it's embarrassing what he's now become.
Posted by: AndrewYF | January 09, 2009 at 04:09 PM
I respect Gammons. But according him there is only baseball on the East Coast. Thats all i ever hear him talk about. And the musician and stroke thing are irrelevant to baseball. My uncle has had two heart attacks and a stroke and is still alive. once again irrelevant to baseball. Dont get me wrong I like him a lot more than some other satchmos in baseball. But to me he is one sided when it comes to certain teams...cough AL east cough cough
Posted by: HenryRowengartner | January 09, 2009 at 04:13 PM
Cleveland is not shopping Shoppach, and Landon Powell would cost way more than Teagarden or Montero given the organization he is in. Accordingly, I say they give Tek $5mil for one (or two years) with some offensive incentives as a nice gesture, and wait on Kottaras etc. Catchers as prospects are usually highly touted, but it often takes awhile for them to find their true status (see, C. Snyder, Shoppach, Napoli, etc) and it's really hit or miss.
Posted by: Mattyc44 | January 09, 2009 at 04:13 PM
There's been widespread speculation that he might be the next commissioner of baseball.
Posted by: midtown
By who?
Posted by: Bernie Brewer | January 09, 2009 at 04:17 PM
To me, I think Boston needs a good defensive catcher and is average at the plate. The team is loaded with talent. Their catcher doesnt have to be the best one in the league. As long as hes calling a good game behind the plate for the pitching that Boston has they will be fine. I know it would be nice to have a great defensive and offensive catcher but there is just not too many flying around the league and never has been. But Im sure they want the best to contend with the 100,000,000 space bucks the Yankees spent
Posted by: HenryRowengartner | January 09, 2009 at 04:19 PM
Well eveyone knows here I am a Clay Bucholz fan, but Micheal Bowden is great too, hard thrower with thought, Daniel Bard, is smooth, he can be dominate, but needs one more pitch. The best easiest motion you ever seen. Why would Theo get rid of any of these great arms.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:24 PM
here's my crazy trade idea of the day
kurt suzuki
cliff pennington
for
jed lowrie
what do you think?
Posted by: arly2380 | January 09, 2009 at 04:29 PM
My boy John Smoltz is going to teach them to be professional, now that is a tutor.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Cy - are you Buchholz's (two "h's" there) agent?
Posted by: vtadave | January 09, 2009 at 04:30 PM
You dont like Jed Lowrie?
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:31 PM
Please ignore arly. He's an A's homer who posts this nonsense on other Internet boards.
Posted by: vtadave | January 09, 2009 at 04:32 PM
hahahaha yes I guess.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:32 PM
Sorry I just hope he gets it.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:33 PM
I really mean it, like Haley's Comet, Bucholz, Bowden, Bard are something special. I am hoping Theo doesnt't trade them
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Id rather have Ty Pennington. Bus driver...move that bus...off of carl pavano
Posted by: HenryRowengartner | January 09, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Please ignore arly. He's an A's homer who posts this nonsense on other Internet boards.
LOL i'm asking people's opinions...take a chill pill mcgrumpy...arent you a dodgers fan??
suzuki can be an above avg catcher,lowrie an above avg SS...now let me know why its a horrible idea or not?
Posted by: arly2380 | January 09, 2009 at 04:39 PM
I am a happy Sox fan at this point, Rocco, Mr. John Smoltz, a fantasitc hard working, Mark Kotsay, Brad Penny, we did good. Not one kid is gone, oh Josh Bard, no slouch. We fight to the finish cause we eat our spinach. I like it. OK lets go to war!!!
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 04:43 PM
no dont beieve it this guy is not worth anything. If and I say if you get rid of Bowden you better get Salty, This guy SUCKS.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 05:06 PM
Montero Sucks.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 09, 2009 at 05:09 PM
"To me, I think Boston needs a good defensive catcher and is average at the plate. The team is loaded with talent. Their catcher doesnt have to be the best one in the league. As long as hes calling a good game behind the plate for the pitching that Boston has they will be fine. I know it would be nice to have a great defensive and offensive catcher but there is just not too many flying around the league and never has been. But Im sure they want the best to contend with the 100,000,000 space bucks the Yankees spent"
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!
A lot of Red Sox fans need to step back and take stock. As our starting nine is currently composed, going into opening day, Jason Bay is batting seventh. If your lineup is stacked to the point you are batting a guy with a career line of .282/.375/.527 seventh, you can afford to throw an automatic out in the catcher's spot for the sake of your defense.
I say screw it, go grab another reliever and go into the season with Bard and Dusty Brown as the catching platoon.
Seriously, who would cry over the following lineup?
Ellsbury
Pedroia
Ortiz
Youkilis
Drew
Lowell
Bay
Bard
Lowrie
Posted by: 0bsessions | January 09, 2009 at 05:09 PM
"I say screw it, go grab another reliever and go into the season with Bard and Dusty Brown as the catching platoon."
My thoughts exactly. Have been a Sox fan for 40+ years and they have had VERY FEW good catchers over that time, Fisk, Pena, Gedman and Tek are it and they can make it a year or 2 without a premium one again, just like in late 80's after he had quit starting and yet the Sox still had a decent pitching staff, it isn't THAT important to have an all star caliber catcher at the position, wait on the price to go down for the one they want, or go with what they already have, it's an upgrade over Tek the last 1 1/2 years anyway.
Posted by: johns | January 09, 2009 at 05:39 PM
Why would you bat Lowell ahead of Bay?
Posted by: midtown | January 09, 2009 at 05:40 PM
"Why would you bat Lowell ahead of Bay?"
Bay is a cleanup hitter on a team like the Pirates inwhich he came from perhaps, but the fact that he is a dead FB hitter and looks downright awful swinging at any kind of off speed pitch pretty much necessitates that in a deeper lineup he has to hit lower and Lowell can hit both FB's and off speed pitches, same with Drew when healthy. I have some fears regarding Bay in 2009 even and how well he will do with this off speed weaknesses being exposed even further.
Posted by: johns | January 09, 2009 at 05:57 PM
Umair: "Red Sox tried to get Ruseel Martin??
I'm a Sox fan and I love the way the FO manages things but really guys, you have to give up more than just Bard if you want players like that. Nothing like that will get done if you don't fork up Buccholz or Bowden. Not that I want them to go but just saying, Red Sox can't expect big deals to get done without giving up anything good."
Just because they won't trade Buchholz for any catcher that Texas has doesn't mean they wouldn't part with real value for a GOOD catcher.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 06:13 PM
HenryRowengartner: "I respect Gammons. But according him there is only baseball on the East Coast."
Is that what Gammons said? Or does he just write about what he know, unlike most ESPN writer who just make stuff up when they don't really know.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 06:16 PM
Right. He talks about what he knows. And he knows the AL East. Does it make him that good of a reporter of baseball when he only writes about East Coast baseball. He fits in perfect with ESPN because it itself is a East Coast Network. Hence the pointless reports we get about any steinbrenner or tom brady. The only thing that throws off that network is the constant talk about the Dallas Cowboys.
Posted by: HenryRowengartner | January 09, 2009 at 06:59 PM
The fact that Bay is a FB would put him higher in the lineup. I know they won't do it but putting Bay 3rd in front of Ortiz would give him tons of FBs.
Posted by: gnick55 | January 09, 2009 at 07:03 PM
Please ignore arly. He's an A's homer who posts this nonsense on other Internet boards.
LOL i'm asking people's opinions...take a chill pill mcgrumpy...arent you a dodgers fan??
suzuki can be an above avg catcher,lowrie an above avg SS...now let me know why its a horrible idea or not?
Posted by: arly2380 | January 09, 2009 at 04:39 PM
_______________________________________________________________________________________
HAHAHAHA did u seriously just say Jew lowrie is an above adverage SS!!!! The kid hasnt proved anything yet! He will probably be replaced at the deadline when he is doing terrible.
As for cathers... I think the red sox should wait a couple of years and get Mauer...the kid is amazing..and a free agent in 2011. Hes not going to stay with the twins if he wants to win anything in his life and the only way to win is to go to a team like the red sox, yankees, mets, angels, ect. The Red Sox should go into the season with Bard as their starter and MAYBE pick up another at the deadline or something if that doesnt work out. They could also add someone like salty...Send Bowden for salty and you probably would have a deal. Then they could use Salty as their everyday catcher next year before they sign Mauer. If he is good enough in 09 and 2010 with the red sox, they probably could trade him for some good relief in the 2011 offseason.
Posted by: Kulaid | January 09, 2009 at 08:04 PM
I am pretty sure that both "runs" Gammons is talking about pretty much involved Theo calling up the Dodgers and Angels and getting turned down immediately.
Posted by: AA | January 09, 2009 at 08:29 PM
HAHAHAHA did u seriously just say Jew lowrie is an above adverage SS!!!! The kid hasnt proved anything yet! He will probably be replaced at the deadline when he is doing terrible.
Calm down Kulaid. You're acting like Dr. Mengele in a Jeter jersey. God only knows what you mean by "replaced."
Posted by: midtown | January 09, 2009 at 08:55 PM
A lot of Red Sox fans need to step back and take stock. As our starting nine is currently composed, going into opening day, Jason Bay is batting seventh. If your lineup is stacked to the point you are batting a guy with a career line of .282/.375/.527 seventh, you can afford to throw an automatic out in the catcher's spot for the sake of your defense.
__________ ______ __________
I agree with this, but if you go with this school of thought, you might as well sign Tek for a year then take a run at Mauer.
We're gonna have to get in line for that one, but if we use that school of thought, we get a good defensive catcher, who has the potential to hit 15 HR's, without selling off the farm.
Just a thought.
Posted by: Gosser128 | January 09, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Seriously, who would cry over the following lineup?
Ellsbury
Pedroia
Ortiz
Youkilis
Drew
Lowell
Bay
Bard
Lowrie
---- ---- ---- ----
When it's 100% healthy, it's one of the best lineups in baseball...health is key for the Red Sox.
Posted by: Ryan | January 09, 2009 at 09:07 PM
does anyone know if doumit is worth considering, and if so, is it possible...what would it take?
i expected to hear his name and i am not sure(educated) on why he's not in more of the discussion...thanks
Posted by: UpstateNYSOXfan | January 09, 2009 at 09:25 PM
HAHAHAHA did u seriously just say Jew lowrie is an above adverage SS!!!! The kid hasnt proved anything yet! He will probably be replaced at the deadline when he is doing terrible.
Calm down Kulaid. You're acting like Dr. Mengele in a Jeter jersey. God only knows what you mean by "replaced."
Posted by: midtown | January 09, 2009 at 08:55 PM
___________________________________________________________
As in...the red sox will probably go out and get a shortshop at the deadline because Lowrie is NOT the answer for that position. He really isnt all that good at all. Completely overated and thats saying something because hes NOT rated high! Hes not better then average at his position, but if your going to base that off of 4 months of baseball then your smoking something and i want some of it!
Posted by: Kulaid | January 09, 2009 at 09:44 PM
Trade martin and loney for youk and buc!
Posted by: KingMayan! | January 10, 2009 at 01:57 AM
Why not sign the vet in Varitek to help out the youngsters and the players coming back from injury in the rotation? Nobody in the league can call a better game than Jason Varitek.
Montero, Bard and other names don't have anything over Tek but age. Tek has the experience and the defensive skill set. It's worth one year and then see where they sit.
The only reason to look in a different direction than Tek at this time is to upgrade on offense, so far I haven't seen a plausible upgrade. Sign Tek and wait till next year for the long term replacement because there isn't any this year.
Posted by: SoxFan2009 | January 10, 2009 at 09:11 AM
I have watched Montero play in AZ for a few years. He's an OK backup, but not an everyday catcher. He can hit OK (not great), but he has absolutly no throwing arm. If a runner gets to 1st, count on him at 2nd within 2 pitches if Montero's catching. The consensus out here is...Trade him!
Posted by: Desert Rat | January 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM
In Montero the Red Sox may be underachieving for their catcher of the future...or maybe they are just posturing and actually planning something more far-reaching after doing the Bard signing. Colorado had been interested in Bard last December but 'didn't have room for him', per Timmy D. They also need pitching. And they also just happened to have a good young catcher named Iannzatta that would meet Boston's need perfectly. Wonder if something like J. Bard plus Bowden plus a mid-level prospect might pry Iannzatta from the Rockies. Based on his OPS and recent experience / improvement he's a MUCH better bet than Montero.
Posted by: Lock | January 11, 2009 at 03:36 PM
And if they then added Varitek/2yrs./low money to an Iannzatta signing they'd be in the home stretch. Interesting to think about.
Posted by: Lock | January 11, 2009 at 03:46 PM