![]() |
|
|
| |
« Peavy To Cubs Unlikely | Main | Odds and Ends: Bonds, Boras, Snell »
David Lennon of Newsday talked to Mets GM Omar Minaya, who expects his pursuit of a starting pitcher to be drawn out. Minaya suggested it could be resolved by mid-January.
The Mets have a three-year, $36MM offer out to Derek Lowe and have made other offers as well. It's been suggested the Mets will top out around three years and $40MM. In a report yesterday, Tony Massarotti said the Mets and Lowe discussed two proposals last week: a four-year deal and a three-year contract with a vesting option. Massarotti suggests the Mets entered the bidding with a weak offer because Lowe has no other suitor in the Northeast. If the Mets don't improve the offer much, it'll be a test of how much geography matters to Lowe. Though not in Lowe's preferred geographic region, Gerry Fraley considers the Braves in the mix for him.
Oliver Perez is next in line for Omar Minaya, though Lennon believes his future is linked to Lowe's. If neither Boras client can be signed, Randy Wolf and Jon Garland become the targets. Pedro Martinez remains a possibility as well. The plan is nice and all, but other teams need starting pitching too and may start signing these guys in the next few weeks.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536a934dc970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets' Pitching Pursuit Will Take Time:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The mets need lowe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and mayb I'll take garland to have the 5th spot..
Posted by: letsgomets787 | January 01, 2009 at 09:30 AM
Have to agree with Tim, its a nice plan but they are not in control of the starting pitching market like they were of the closing market.
Their offer to Lowe and their rumored ceiling for offers to him is so low (nice pun), that they can't sit back and let him shop it, because alot of teams will match it and beat it.
Posted by: Chris | January 01, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Not sure who else (with cash) that is out there to beat it Chris. Doubt the Dodgers will be after him since he just left, Yankees have a habit of never getting enough starting pitchers anyway and are gloating over what they already have, Boston just signed Penny as a 5th guy and they have Bowden and Bucholz behind him, Angels maybe, but they just spent 20 million on Fuentes and still need a hitter to protect Vlad, Milwaukee does not seem to have the funds and Lowe wants to be in the NE anyway.
What does this leave? Atlanta maybe? Philly? Sure, Mets can give Boras what he wants, but why? They can always get that guy Mets fans always seemed to loved (sic) Ollie Perez probably cheaper after Lowe signs, or Jon Garland for about the same as Perez in the 8-10 million range, even Paul Byrd at less than that.
Hold off on Pedro and Wolf maybe, unless it is for 6th guy starters, those guys are not going to give much, just cost too much.
Posted by: johns | January 01, 2009 at 09:43 AM
I have been saying all along that the Detroit Tigers are a wild card team to land Derek Lowe. They have the resources to pony up the cash necessary to land him, while they also have a need in their starting rotation that Derek Lowe would address nicely. Lowe would fit nicely in Detroit and would be strongly backed by their potent offense. The Mets sadly aren't in control of the market here like they were with Francisco Rodriguez...
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 09:50 AM
The Detroit Tigers current rotation as according to espn.com:
SP1 Justin Verlander
SP2 Jeremy Bonderman
SP3 Edwin Jackson
SP4 Armando Galarraga
SP5 Zach Miner/Nate Robertson
A signing of Derek Lowe would make this rotation look stellar on paper and it would make one of or both of Zach Miner, Nate Robertson, or Dontrelle Willis expendable...
Rotation with D. Lowe
SP1 Justin Verlander
SP2 Derek Lowe
SP3 Jeremy Bonderman
SP4 Edwin Jackson
SP5 Armando Galaragga
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 09:57 AM
Pedro Martinez = bargain of the off-season?
I wonder if his value has fallen so far that Oakland has a shot at him?
Any info on whether he likes/dislikes the West Coast Timmy?
I don't mean to sound callous, but I can't imagine Pedro was really focused on baseball in '08 and if I was valuing him I'd give him a mulligan for last season.
Posted by: OaklandAussie | January 01, 2009 at 09:59 AM
While its fine to hear about all rumors, I don't understand the obsession with the Mets, Yankees and Red Sox when there are many more teams that should get some attention.
I, for one, want to know what's going on with the Braves.
Posted by: bravo27 | January 01, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Wren is probably going out of his way to keep anything and every thing quite.
Posted by: wisbrave | January 01, 2009 at 10:27 AM
I doubt Detroit has any money to spend. I seem to remember reports earlier this offseason that they needed to lower the payroll they already have for '09. Unless a trade is made, I don't see them landing Lowe.
Posted by: WhiteSoxFan | January 01, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Maybe just Maybe the reason why he post alot on the Mets this week is because Derek Lowe is who they are after and just happens to be the best FA starter left..... NAH has nothing to do with it, Its Definatly a New York Conspiracy lol HATERS !!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mr. T The MeTro MaN | January 01, 2009 at 11:12 AM
This is what i hate about the Mets, they always try to nickel and dime everything!! Just freaking sign Lowe and Wolf and be done with it. This isnt Kansas City or Pittsburgh, they have the money and the fan base. If they keep screwing around, they are gonna lose out on the good pitchers and have to sign Garland or Redding. No wonder they are second fiddle in NY.
Posted by: wrightreyes1 | January 01, 2009 at 11:20 AM
@wrightreyes1:
As a Phillies fan, I normally never agree with a Mets fab, but I agree 100%. What's the difference betweeen 3 years, $36 million and 3 years, $40 million to the NY Mets?
Good luck explaining it to the fan base if Omar continues to try and lowball Lowe and he signs elsewhere (I don't think the idea of Lowe resigning with the Dodgers is that out of the question). Remember - this is Scott Boras we're talking about. The guy's a freaking magician when it comes to getting teams to pony up money for his guys.
Posted by: tolo316 | January 01, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Yeah, it's foolish of the Mets to try and get their man for the least amount of money possible (Rolleyes). How dare they!
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | January 01, 2009 at 11:43 AM
"Remember - this is Scott Boras we're talking about. The guy's a freaking magician when it comes to getting teams to pony up money for his guys."
He is going to have to be better than Harry Houdini ever was to get what he THOUGHT Varitek, Lowe, Perez and Ramirez was worth through his distorted mind.
Posted by: johns | January 01, 2009 at 12:01 PM
"He is going to have to be better than Harry Houdini ever was to get what he THOUGHT Varitek, Lowe, Perez and Ramirez was worth through his distorted mind."
Agreed on Varitek, Perez, and Ramirez (honestly think its Boston or retirement for Tek)
But,honestly, 4/60 is very fair for Lowe. Very, very fair. If Boras is asking for more, he probably won't get it, but 3/36 or 3/40 are pretty low.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:27 PM
I am a little surprised that the mets have resisted the temptation to buy more players this offseason.
"But,honestly, 4/60 is very fair for Lowe. Very, very fair."
Maybe before the economy took a hit. Even last year that seems like a lot for a guy like lowe who is turning 36 this year. Its fair price until you get into the third year and especially the 4th year of the deal. Hard to blame teams for realizing that and trying to either minimize years or pay him less money.
Posted by: walkoffblast | January 01, 2009 at 02:02 PM
If the Mets are serious about signing Lowe they will offer him 4 yrs with an option for a 5th. Stop playing around and get it done and move on, jeez.
Posted by: kerelcooper | January 01, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Maybe before the economy took a hit. Even last year that seems like a lot for a guy like lowe who is turning 36 this year. Its fair price until you get into the third year and especially the 4th year of the deal. Hard to blame teams for realizing that and trying to either minimize years or pay him less money.
Posted by: walkoffblast | January 01, 2009 at 02:02 PM
The Economy??? Yes, thore POOR, POOR Billionaires!!!!
2008 made history again for attendance in MLB.
Plus the Mets get a new stadium to play in, almost guarenting sell outs night in and out.. until they implode again in September.
I will laugh my PHUCKING arse off if Lowe signs somewhere else because the Mets lowballed him.
Posted by: FyreKnight | January 01, 2009 at 02:56 PM
Lowe's original desire was 5/90, so no Boras isn't all that spectacular at getting his desired price. He starts high, just as the team,s the Mets in this case, start Lowe. K-Rod's desire was 5/75 and the Mets got him for half, that was so stupid of them too wasn't it? Just because Omar doesn't get his FA to sign within hours of an offer doesn't mean he's a bad GM, he's actually one of the better ones out there and he knows what he is doing.
Posted by: 86 World Series Baby | January 01, 2009 at 03:50 PM
"Their offer to Lowe and their rumored ceiling for offers to him is so low (nice pun), that they can't sit back and let him shop it, because alot of teams will match it and beat it."
Yes, but this is what drives me crazy. It makes no difference whether another team decided to better an offer, because the Mets will still have a chance to match it after that. Boras is not going to take Lowe into a room and accept an offer of 3/42 from somebody else without coming back to NY and seeing if they want to match/better that offer. Once again, this is not PS2. You don't lose a guy because you lowball him and then somebody else swoops in with an offer. You will almost always get a chance to match. I get the feeling that people think that because the Mets offered 3/36, that this is somehow their final offer and anything a dollar higher will close the deal immediately for whoever makes the offer. Just wrong.
On a sidenote, does anybody else feel bad for FyreKnight? He must live a brutally horrible life. The guy is just so sad. God bless you my friend.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 01, 2009 at 04:54 PM
"Pedro Martinez = bargain of the off-season?
I wonder if his value has fallen so far that Oakland has a shot at him?
Any info on whether he likes/dislikes the West Coast Timmy?
I don't mean to sound callous, but I can't imagine Pedro was really focused on baseball in '08 and if I was valuing him I'd give him a mulligan for last season."
Exactly. He tweaked a hammy in the rain in his first game of the year. He already had his work cut out for him in year 1 of returning from shoulder surgery. He was facing the imminent passing of his father. Common knowledge would make you think that he should bounce back, especially considering he is the number 1 pitcher of this generation, hands down. But in Met land, if you have a career year you are a god (Xavier Nady), and if you have a down year they try to toss you out the door (Heilman, Pedro, etc.). I absolutely agree Pedro will be a steal for whoever picks him up.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 01, 2009 at 04:58 PM
"This is what i hate about the Mets, they always try to nickel and dime everything!! Just freaking sign Lowe and Wolf and be done with it. This isnt Kansas City or Pittsburgh, they have the money and the fan base. If they keep screwing around, they are gonna lose out on the good pitchers and have to sign Garland or Redding. No wonder they are second fiddle in NY."
Agreed, I mean an identical approach obviously didn't work with Carlos Beltran, or that Johan Santana guy, or this closer they just signed.... BB-Rod? I mean, the exact same approach Omar is taking right now has not worked multiple times in the last couple of seasons alone..... oh wait. We understand you want a deal done. But stop acting like there is some grand reason the Mets should just lock it up now. Just admit it is because you are spoiled, bored, and just want your guy now so you can argue with guys like FyReKnight about who the best team is.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 01, 2009 at 05:01 PM
The Braves have the money to sign Lowe. And he would be precisely the top-of-rotation stabilizer the Braves need until Hudson is back in 2010. (If Hudson fully recovers from TJ, they'll exercise the option. Count on it.)
Whether Wren wants to spend the money on Lowe is another matter. He'd be an idiot to let Lowe sign within the division, even if the Braves have to pay a little more than they'd prefer to get him.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 01, 2009 at 05:02 PM
"The Braves have the money to sign Lowe. And he would be precisely the top-of-rotation stabilizer the Braves need until Hudson is back in 2010."
Lowe has never really been a "top of the rotation" guy and if he is forced into that so called "stopper" role, his new team mat be disappointed. He relies almost exclusively on that sinker/slider and can get into serious trouble when it "ain't sinking" unline a guy that can get away throwing harder, it may not be wise to rely on a guy like this as a #1-2 guy, but as your prototype 3-4 guy that he pretty much always has been that is as good as there is and has always been since he stopped being the closer for Boston. He did win 20 games for Boston once granted, he just does not have the potential dominance required to be that stopper IMO, the neither does any other other leftover FA's like Byrd, Wolf, Garland. Perez does, but he is wild 50% of his starts and is best suited for the 3-4 position also.
MelonisRex, when I posted about Lowe and Boras not getting what they wanted it was indeed that outrageous 5/90 that initially came out. The 4/60 can see, but think that is still too much and 3/40 is about it. If Philly could sweep in and get him for that? It would lock up their rotation 1-5 and *maybe* lights out for the NL East.
Posted by: johns | January 01, 2009 at 05:19 PM
"Just admit it is because you are spoiled, bored, and just want your guy now so you can argue with guys like FyReKnight about who the best team is."
spoiled?? yeah, because the Mets have won so many division titles in the last 20 years?? c'mon, get a clue!! The Mets never win year after year because the Wilpons(Coupons) refuse to go that extra mile to acquire pieces to put them over the top. We are second fiddle in NY, that is a fact! Oh, and i dont blame Omar at all, his hands are tied by these cheap a$$ owners we have.
Posted by: wrightreyes1 | January 01, 2009 at 05:44 PM
nrmax88, you sound like the Wilpons' accountant or something. We will never be like the Yankees(26 titles) but the Wilpons could at least pretend that they care about the fanbase. Also, if it was up to Omar, Manny would be a Met and we would have a much more formidable lineup. Delcrapo and the rest of the guys are chokers and Manny would come through when it counts,hitting with RISP!! Lowe,Wolf and Manny will change my tune about the NL East title in '09 but i doubt we even get 2 out of 3.
Posted by: wrightreyes1 | January 01, 2009 at 05:57 PM
"Oh, and i dont blame Omar at all, his hands are tied by these cheap a$$ owners we have."
Half million away from second highest payroll in baseball. Yeah really cheap.
"The Economy??? Yes, thore POOR, POOR Billionaires!!!!
2008 made history again for attendance in MLB."
Its not the billionaires you have to worry about its the fans that could barely afford to go to the games as it was and will not be going as much if at all this year. 2008 did yield great attendance but its pretty obvious teams are operating like they are going to drop significantly this year and hurt revenue streams.
Posted by: walkoffblast | January 01, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Its all about good business. I will say that the met fans deserve a sure thing for once. Manny would be an unbelievable addition and certainly put us as the "team to beat".
That being said... the Wilpons did just lose 300+ Million bucks.
anyway, I think that we will certianly sign lowe, and I really like the wish list of Lowe Wolf and Manny while I think that Lowe Wolf and Burrell might be more realistic. Not that I support it.
Posted by: Fish&Mets | January 02, 2009 at 12:51 AM