MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Red Sox Agree To Terms With Baldelli, Smoltz | Main | Pirates Talk Nady, Swisher With Yankees »

Padres Re-Sign Scott Hairston

According to the Associated Press, the San Diego Padres have avoided arbitration with Scott Hairston, signing him for $1.25MM for '09.

Hairston, 28, hit .248/.312/.479 last season with 17 home runs and 31 RBI in 326-at bats.  He'll provide depth in San Diego's outfield this season.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536bef91f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Padres Re-Sign Scott Hairston:

Comments

Pretty sure he was just arb eligible.

I'm guessing he's gonna be a backup?

A backup at 1.25 mil is pretty high for a team that wouldn't even spend 4 mil on their lifetime closer.

Not a by the definition back-up. It looks like he'll form a platoon with Jody Gerut in CF, and see a good amount of time in LF too to spell Chase Headley. For a team with little chance of competing, spending more than a million or two on a closer is a luxury they didn't have, no matter how much the player meant to the city. Not to mention they had Heath Bell ready to close games. 2009'll be his time to sink or swim. Showing he can be a closer is literally the difference between millions of dollars come free agent time for Heath.

I don't know... it's the NL West, I think every team has a chance there. Unless, of course, the Dodgers resign Manny.

It's a shame the Padres are in this financial mess since I like their core players in Peavy, Young, Headley, Bell, Giles and Gonzalez.

Yeah he'll be a backup but a backup that will most likely platoon with all 3 guys in the OF like the poster above said. Pretty cheap for a guy who hit almost 20 HR's, good signing by the Pads as expected.

As a longtime SD fan, I'm not saying Hairston has no place on a MLB roster, but I can honestly say that if the guy was going to break out, he would have already. He's had the opportunity in the past. I don't think I'll face too much opposition with that claim.

His 20 HR's don't mean much, as none of them ever seem to influence the game. He'll hit one when we're 6 down or 6 up. So, if we accept that this guy is going to have little impact on the season, why even sign him? His overall impact (maybe not his stats, but his influence on a game) can easily be replaced by a cheaper guy. Better yet, give a guy like Venable a shot.

I don't know. In the grand scheme of things, I just have a hard time accepting that we're not bringing back Trevor when his salary is basically equal to Hairston's and a couple other guys.

And this isn't to say that I don't believe in Heath Bell. The guy will get his turn. But it just seems that after everything Trevor has done, he at least would be given the opportunity to finish his career in SD.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.