![]() |
|
|
| |
« Olney's Latest: Peavy, Braves, Lowe, Sheets | Main | Gregg Zaun Interested In Boston »
Every Sunday we read John Perrotto's Every Given Sunday:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536a84db0970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Perrotto's Latest: Ramirez, Lowe:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
"Collision" charges? Um... collusion perhaps? :)
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 04, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Oh god.
1. Perez and Motte. Perez and Motte. Perez and Motte. Keep Carp in the rotation and sign another SP.
2. I would love to see the proceedings of a Barry Bonds v. MLB collusion charge.
3. If the Giants offer 3/63 to Manny, he would be smart to take that offer NOW. Although that could get ugly in 2010/2011 with arb cases and other fun.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 04, 2009 at 12:30 PM
when are the dodgers gonna start talks with manny?
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 04, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Barry must've been involved in a hit and run or something...
Posted by: Jason F | January 04, 2009 at 12:35 PM
lol, the giants offer 4 years 100 mill for Manny? please.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | January 04, 2009 at 12:36 PM
"Barry must've been involved in a hit and run or something..."
Thus the hip surgery??? ;)
Posted by: el clash combo | January 04, 2009 at 12:37 PM
I was recently rear-ended. Freudian slip perhaps? Thanks guys.
Posted by: Nat Boyle | January 04, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Wow, let's see. Barry hasn't played in more than a year and he's coming off hip surgery and won't be ready for spring training. And he's going to be 45. And he won't be able to "enhance" as easily as he once did, if you catch my drift.
Sounds like a hot commodity to me.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 04, 2009 at 12:39 PM
are the dodgers gonna start talks with manny or what can anyone tell me
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 04, 2009 at 12:40 PM
dodgers1994. No, they are not.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | January 04, 2009 at 12:42 PM
"Barry must've been involved in a hit and run or something..."
"Thus the hip surgery??? ;)"
You should see the Mac truck!!!
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 04, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Oh yeah, and I forgot another thing about Barry. If no one signs him, he's pursuing collusion charges.
Delusion charges, I can believe. Collusion, not so much.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 04, 2009 at 12:45 PM
nedcollettieclueless,,
why wont they start talks they said that they would and they wanted manny back what ever happened
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 04, 2009 at 12:47 PM
did they give up on him completly or something they dont want him
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 04, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Wow, let's see. Barry hasn't played in more than a year and he's coming off hip surgery and won't be ready for spring training. And he's going to be 45. And he won't be able to "enhance" as easily as he once did, if you catch my drift.
Sounds like a hot commodity to me.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 04, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Barry not playing has nothing at all to do with his ability, or lack thereof as you allege, to hit a baseball. Take away all of the hoopla that surrounds him and what better fit for a dh role in the al has there ever been? Add to the hoopla the absurd amount of money I'm sure he'd ask for, no al team will take the chance on him. But let's not doubt the man's ability to hit. No doubt in my mind that he would hit 25+ HR's with a ridiculous OBP if slotted into any dh spot in the al. It just won't happen, though. Now that I think about it, if he was given a shot and ended up mashing al pitching, that might strengthen his case with respect to his "collision" charges (sorry, nat, couldn't resist)...maybe there's the real reason mlb as a whole is discouraging his return. Just a thought...
Posted by: Jason F | January 04, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Dodgers can't afford Manny
Posted by: Corey Kelch | January 04, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Enough already! The Giants are NOT going to offer Ramirez more than 2 years and the Dodgers are freeing up money as we speak to sign him. We're talking about one franchise that has a 2 year plan to contend and put people in the seats now (short term contracts to Renteria, Johnson, Affeldt) until their kids mature (Posey, Gillespie, Bumgardener,etc.) and another franchise with no plan, that has a history of oversigning players to win now (Dreifort, Kevin Brown, Schmidt, Jones, etc). I also point to the fact that the Dodgers have a history of being one of the top 5 in payroll every year with nothing to show for it, unless you want to count last year when they won the worst division in baseball. One year! What about all the other years? Bottom line, L.A. will sign Ramirez and "Mr. Head Case" will quit on them just like he quit on Boston while the Giants drive up the price, bow out, and continue to rebuild and take over the division in 2-3 years with lower payroll while building from within.
Posted by: Gary D | January 04, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Looks to me like the Giants are going to get their replacement for Barry Bonds in another ball mashing washed up fielder... A guy who will probably put a few over the wall but also drop a few in left field, and bring a ton of attention along with him!
MANNY RAMIREZ!!!
Posted by: Corey Kelch | January 04, 2009 at 01:01 PM
no there not signing manny. until you here the ownerof the giants go out and say we are formily offering manny a 3 year deal dont even say ur gonna do it
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 04, 2009 at 01:05 PM
I wonder where these writers outside of the city get their info??
The San Francisco beat writers continue to state NO OFFER HAS BEEN MADE!
Boras must be hard at work dropping little hints to Denver and Perrotto. He certainly isn't doing much to deny them.
Posted by: 55saveslives | January 04, 2009 at 01:12 PM
"The San Francisco beat writers continue to state NO OFFER HAS BEEN MADE!"
Reread the post. No offer has been made; the Giants are considering making one of two offers. So the story collaborates with the SF reporters.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 04, 2009 at 01:15 PM
The Dodgers a Dunn talking (to Manny). :)
Posted by: A | January 04, 2009 at 01:19 PM
Lowe wants 16 million a year...and seeks a 5 yr 80 million deal..good luck with that ...
The Giants are used to baggage with Barry and Manny I am sure can handle SF as well as SF handling Manny - after all he hasnt been part of the steroid era,collusion or collision or any charges, just that Manny being Manny isnt so wonderful all the time
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 04, 2009 at 01:29 PM
5 yr 80 million, Yeah right.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 04, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Oh yeah riiiight, the Giants offered 4 years at $100 mil. Let's see if Colletti will top that phantom offer.
You gotta admit, nobody does the two-step of bs and spin like Boras.
Posted by: paxterj | January 04, 2009 at 01:49 PM
Which contract if it ever occurred would be the most idiotic? Ramirez @ 4 yrs and 100 million, or Lowe 5 years and 80 million?
Posted by: johns | January 04, 2009 at 02:03 PM
"Which contract if it ever occurred would be the most idiotic? Ramirez @ 4 yrs and 100 million, or Lowe 5 years and 80 million?"
Ramirez.
I have much, much more confidence in Lowe being able to produce well through at least year 4. Manny, especially for an NL team, will be a massive disaster by Year 2.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 04, 2009 at 02:06 PM
OK. Not year 2, but year 3.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 04, 2009 at 02:06 PM
the manny discussion is just a rehash of older, and since discredited, stories. If the Giants were to sign manny, they'd have more outfielders than starting pitchers. With the glut of outfielders, especially corner outfielders, on the free agent market, there's no way the giants would get value in a trade for any of their current players. I think it's just more smoke from boras and company to get the dodgers to up their offer.
Posted by: Bob Raines | January 04, 2009 at 02:18 PM
We're talking about one franchise that has a 2 year plan to contend and put people in the seats now (short term contracts to Renteria, Johnson, Affeldt) until their kids mature (Posey, Gillespie, Bumgardener,etc.) and another franchise with no plan, that has a history of oversigning players to win now (Dreifort, Kevin Brown, Schmidt, Jones, etc).
------------------------------
The Dodgers have no plan? Going to the playoffs in 2004, 2006, 2008 while turning over half their starting positions to their farm system is no plan?
The reason the Dodgers "oversign" at least on Schmidt and Jones is because they have kids making league minimum at the other positions. In fact, that seems like a real plan too. Sign a higher value/ less years to fill the open positions the farm system can't provide at minimum cost.
Think before you type Gary D. You're incorrect AND a biased Giant homer.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 04, 2009 at 02:20 PM
"they'd have more outfielders than starting pitchers. With the glut of outfielders, especially corner outfielders, on the free agent market, there's no way the giants would get value in a trade for any of their current players."
Can't the same thing be said about the Dodgers?
Posted by: A | January 04, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Oooh! How scary! Chris Carpenter is gonna be a closer!
Cards SUCK.
Posted by: Ed The Cubbie Genius | January 04, 2009 at 03:01 PM
melonis rex,
I usually enjoy reading your posts, but I must say that you are wrong here. Manny is far more valuable than Derek Lowe. There is simply no comparison. Manny is possibly one of the ten best hitters who ever lived, and he would be money well spent in San Francisco for a three or even a four-year deal. The guy will be raking into his early forties--he has THAT kind of talent.
I'm assuming you say he'll be a bust after two years because of the whole Boston fiasco; however, San Francisco is a completely different city with a completely different scenario. San Francisco is a diverse city with a need for a prodigious star. In other words, Manny would get all the attention he needs there, rather than being one of many big name players like his experience in Boston.
His production in Los Angeles provides a perfect case study for these aforementioned circumstances.
Posted by: peezy | January 04, 2009 at 09:26 PM
"Enough already! The Giants are NOT going to offer Ramirez more than 2 years and the Dodgers are freeing up money as we speak to sign him. We're talking about one franchise that has a 2 year plan to contend and put people in the seats now (short term contracts to Renteria, Johnson, Affeldt) until their kids mature (Posey, Gillespie, Bumgardener,etc.) and another franchise with no plan, that has a history of oversigning players to win now (Dreifort, Kevin Brown, Schmidt, Jones, etc). I also point to the fact that the Dodgers have a history of being one of the top 5 in payroll every year with nothing to show for it, unless you want to count last year when they won the worst division in baseball. One year! What about all the other years? Bottom line, L.A. will sign Ramirez and "Mr. Head Case" will quit on them just like he quit on Boston while the Giants drive up the price, bow out, and continue to rebuild and take over the division in 2-3 years with lower payroll while building from within.
Posted by: Gary D | January 04, 2009 at 12:59 PM"
That is classic dude. Especially coming from a San Fran fan. The town with not one championship.. I don't like saying that cause I was young when the Dodgers last did something(1 year old)
But still dude, come on. the Giants should of renamed themselves San Fran Bonds..
I really liked this
"(short term contracts to Renteria, Johnson, Affeldt) until their kids mature (Posey, Gillespie, Bumgardener,etc.)"
Your plan is almost identical to what the Dodgers are doing.. But we are doing it better.
So Rowand and Zito do not play for the Giants? And they aren't going to make almost 200 million between them? Over payed a little? How much did you sign Dave Roberts for?
Kemp, Martin, Loney, Dewitt, Kershaw, Bills, McDonald, Troncoso, Kuo, Broxton, Wade, Hu, and Elbert are homegrown and producing..
just stop
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 05, 2009 at 01:07 AM
Giants payroll
2004 - $82,019,166 DNQ
2005 - $90,199,500 DNQ
2006 - $90,056,419 DNQ
2007 - $90,219,056 DNQ
2008 - $76,594,500 DNQ
Dodgers Payroll
2004 - $92,902,001 Division
2005 - $83,039,000 DNQ
2006 - $98,447,187 WildCard
2007 - $108,454,524 DNQ
2008 - $118,588,536 Division
Okay so we spend more? And we win more so whats you point?
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 05, 2009 at 01:25 AM
Jake you are throwing fuel on the fire, nothing you said makes sense.. Calling us morons while bringing nothing to the table.
"The Giants minor league system is also way more full. Burgmarger, Alderson, Villanova, and Posey. Who do the Dodgers have? Ya they have some younger players in the MLB now, Kemp, Billingsley Kershaw, Loney, and Martin. After that then who? No one thats who."
Okay, the whole point of a farm system.. too develop young talent, and then promote that talent to the major league level.. and almost half the team is home grown. I name 13 players, and you name 4 and then say we have nothing.. alright.
Alderson, Baumgaudner, Posey have not even played above Class A..
"Dont tell me that the Dodgers dont have any bad contracts... and i know the Giants do too but they only a couple. The Dodgers have many many bad contracts.. Pierre 11 mil, schmidt 17 mil, Jones 18 mil, this is like a joke. 36 million commited to 3 players, none of which are going to start or do anything
The Giants have zito, 18 mil, roberts 6 mil, and Rowand 12 mil. Rowand is bad but not Jones bad, Roberts sucks.. and at least zito is somewhat productive as a number 5 starter."
Once again, CLASSIC..
Zito 126 million dollars
I love it when 5 starters make 18 million for the next 5 years..
Rowand 60 million dollars
Roberts 18 million dollars
209 million for 4 players..
Jones 38 million
Pierre 44 million
Schmidt 47 million
Okay 129 million dollars
and after 09?
Pierre's contract plus the remainder of Jones' so maybe about 15 million a year..
The one thing Coletti has done and worked(not for the sake of good baseball) is these contracts, what if he signs them for more than 2-3 years and they stink? Oh wait he signed them for 2-3 years and 2 of those contracts are done this year..
"All while the Giants are the favorites in the division right now"
Renteria, Johnson, and Affeldt might put you above .500
There is no way the Giants are better than Arizona and LA.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 05, 2009 at 03:06 AM
But the dodgers were barely over .500 and made the playoffs...
After the Giants fielded the youth, they went 6 and 3 against the dodgers, and the team has improved since. I'm just saying it will be more competitive this year so don't get too arrogant just yet and go on thinking it's between just you and the diamondbacks.
Hu and Elbert... really? my dodger friends dont even like Hu, and Elbert is already breaking down. McDonald seems legitimate though.
Posted by: standtallurgiants | January 05, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Very convenient that you left out the 2000-2003 seasons. LOL!
Giants
2000 – 53,541,000 DIV 97-65 (.599)
2001 – 63,280,167 DNQ 90-72 (.556)
2002 – 78,299,835 NL 95-66 (.590)
2003 – 82,852,167 DIV 100-61 (.621)
Dodgers
2000 – 90,700,000 DNQ 86-76 (.531)
2001 – 109,105,952 DNQ 86-76 (.531)
2002 – 94,850,953 DNQ 92-70 (.568)
2003 – 105,872,260 DNQ 85-77 (.525)
Posted by: kdub | January 05, 2009 at 07:23 PM