![]() |
|
|
| |
« Nick Johnson Trade Talks With Oakland Resume | Main | Padres Considering Eckstein, Vizquel »
THURSDAY: According to the AP, Colon gets $1MM plus another possible $2MM based on innings pitched.
WEDNESDAY: FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal reports that the White Sox have added veteran pitcher Bartolo Colon on a one-year deal.
Rosenthal believes Colon will compete for the fifth spot in the starting rotation, along with Aaron Poreda. The 35-year-old Colon started seven games for the Red Sox last season, posting a 3.92 ERA and record of 4-2. Colon was a workhorse for the 2003 White Sox, tossing 242 innings.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536c89e5a970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference White Sox Agree To Terms With Bartolo Colon:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Deja Vu is happening again.
Posted by: CubsLuck | January 14, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Sweet, low risik high reward.
Posted by: kcatlantis | January 14, 2009 at 06:31 PM
Good signing
Posted by: mynameborat | January 14, 2009 at 06:33 PM
What? Was David Wells busy?
Posted by: WhiteSoxFan | January 14, 2009 at 06:35 PM
I don't know about this. Hopefully he pans out but Colon is old and I do not see him helping the team all that much. If they got him for cheap it won't be to bad. We will see
Posted by: Tough | January 14, 2009 at 06:35 PM
As a perk, half his salary will be paid to him as large pizzas
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 14, 2009 at 06:36 PM
watch out pizzarias
Posted by: avg.yankeefaniq=37 | January 14, 2009 at 06:36 PM
As a perk, half his salary will be paid to him as large pizzas
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 14, 2009 at 06:36 PM
my thoughts exactly
Posted by: avg.yankeefaniq=37 | January 14, 2009 at 06:37 PM
He was solid for the Red Sox last year, until he threw out his back hitting. Good signing, IMO.
Posted by: soxfan93 | January 14, 2009 at 06:38 PM
Look out, here come my White Sox!!!!
...goddamnit...
Posted by: part-time pariah | January 14, 2009 at 06:41 PM
Good pickup, he really helped the Sox last year when Dice-K was out.
Posted by: MVPedroia | January 14, 2009 at 06:41 PM
More like low risk, low reward. There's not much of a high ceiling with Bartolo anymore. But, he could end up being a serviceable fifth starter.
Posted by: Joe | January 14, 2009 at 06:41 PM
He was solid for the Red Sox, until he injured himself and refused to come back and help out the team since he wouldn't be a starting pitcher, and was eventually dropped.
That speaks to the guy more than his weight, oh and the weight problem.
I wouldn't want him on my team in any shape or form.
Posted by: quintjs | January 14, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Great, now we can sign Freddy Garcia and we will have a solid #5. Why can't we sign a decent pitcher? Ben Sheets anyone? Is this our big splash? Oh yeah, I forgot we signed Nix, I almost jizzed in my pants on that signing. Give me a break Kenny, this is not gonna bring people to the park. Go get me Abreu and Roberts.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 06:42 PM
if colon showed half as much desire to pitch as he does to eat, this could be a good signing.
Posted by: glen_quagmire | January 14, 2009 at 06:42 PM
He signed with the White Sox because Chicago does have the BEST!! Pizza in the world. That's another reason he didn't sign with any NY team
Posted by: platinum1 | January 14, 2009 at 06:44 PM
"Great, now we can sign Freddy Garcia and we will have a solid #5. Why can't we sign a decent pitcher? Ben Sheets anyone? Is this our big splash? Oh yeah, I forgot we signed Nix, I almost jizzed in my pants on that signing. Give me a break Kenny, this is not gonna bring people to the park. Go get me Abreu and Roberts."
lol. no. just no.
Posted by: part-time pariah | January 14, 2009 at 06:44 PM
White Sox roster: +300 lbs.
This is a good, not great signing. Get a pitcher with a proven history that can keep the 5th spot warm until Poreda is ready while instilling a veteran presence.
So now, it's Mark Buerhle, Danks, Floyd, Richard, Colon? Depending on his arm, it should help the bullpen out. Now sign Freddy to a one year guaranteed, club option deal and the rotation is somewhat set. I'm also hoping KW pulls off a Sheets signing as well. Maybe the three of em can contribute a whole season, combined.
Posted by: NoamOnMyChomsky | January 14, 2009 at 06:45 PM
I hope none of you actually think he'll last a whole season...
Posted by: part-time pariah | January 14, 2009 at 06:47 PM
I would rather see Colon as the fifth starter than some of the other options they have..
Posted by: Nick | January 14, 2009 at 06:49 PM
"Give me a break Kenny, this is not gonna bring people to the park. Go get me Abreu and Roberts."
KW has always had a competitive team without big marquee signings. How have those big name signings helped the yankees in the past 7 years?
Posted by: tschram | January 14, 2009 at 06:49 PM
Has the big name signings helped the 2008 Detroit Tigers?
Posted by: Nick | January 14, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Oh yeah thanks for Lillibridge, he should be good too. I can't wait to see this hitless wonder play in pinstripes in 09. I just creamed my pants again. Kenny get a clue. Go get us some speed. We want Roberts and an OBP guy like Abreu. That is what those 2 big name marquee guys will bring tschram!! We haven't upgraded anywhere.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 06:54 PM
He's no more of a risk day to day than Poreda will be in the near future.
Posted by: Jonny Spinns | January 14, 2009 at 06:55 PM
Roberts and Abreu, in my opinion, are all wrong for us. Getting younger and shredding payroll are the owner's objective here. Signing two aged guys like that are completely contradictory to what they White Sox are preaching.
Posted by: part-time pariah | January 14, 2009 at 06:57 PM
BREAKING NEWS ALERT:
The Chicago White Sox have just signed Rosati's Pizza to a one-year deal. The deal seems to still be in discussions, but it seems that for every pizza Bartolo Colon eats, RP gets $1,000.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | January 14, 2009 at 07:04 PM
I guess it's better than signing Sweaty Freddy. I guess.....
Posted by: MPM | January 14, 2009 at 07:07 PM
"I wouldn't want him on my team in any shape or form."
And unfortunately Bartolo only comes in one LARGE shape.
Posted by: el clash combo | January 14, 2009 at 07:15 PM
"Colon will compete for a spot in the White Sox rotation, which lost Javier Vazquez to free agency"
Wow! Here's a tip Rosenthal, baseball is played in areas outside of the northeast - you can't just make stuff up - Vazquez was traded.
Posted by: southsider | January 14, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Post #65
Draft Pick
Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: March 10, 2008
Member No.: 7,063
-I am sitting here chuckling just at the possibility of Herb's fatass helping a hobbled Fatolo off the field.
- Anyone with good seats between the bases better learn to keep an eye on their churros.
- Special Announcement: Bartolo's Soxfest signing will be held at the end of of the Palmer House buffet. For an additional $5 Colon will sign your memorabilia with a barbecue rib.
- Maybe Kenny was thinking he could fill both holes in the rotation by signing just Bartolo's fatass?
- Whitesox.com press release: With the prospect of newly aquired Bartolo Colon seeing some action as a long reliever, renovations to widen the gate to the bullpen will begin immediately. Also, Bartolo will be forced to sit Indian style on the bullpen mound as the bench will not support both him and Jenks.
- Nancy Foust is furiously working on an organ rendition of Sir Mixalot's classic: Bartolo Got Back.
- When the city of Chicago asked the White Sox to "Beef Up Security" around the ballpark due to terrorist threats, this signing wasn't what they had in mind.
- During contract negotiations Bartolo was able to gain a great deal of leverage against KW by threatening to forgo the '09 season to appear on "The Biggest Loser". This strategy worked because Rick Hahn was convinced Colon meant he had an offer from the Cubs.
- Brooks Boyer is already planning: Bartolo Colon BobbleBelly Day!
- Bartolo likes the idea of wearing all black to support the Sox fan's "Blackout", as he thinks black gives his hips a "slimming effect".
Posted by: Officer Karkovice > Chuck Norris | January 14, 2009 at 07:24 PM
"He was solid for the Red Sox last year, until he threw out his back hitting. Good signing, IMO."
Yeah, just make sure he understands that it is OKAY for an AL pitcher to strike out looking in interleague play. He was doing well as a back-of-the-rotation guy before that incident.
Posted by: kevinb | January 14, 2009 at 07:30 PM
Hahahaha the White Sox are in for a long year...
Posted by: 123456789 | January 14, 2009 at 07:30 PM
"Wow! Here's a tip Rosenthal, baseball is played in areas outside of the northeast - you can't just make stuff up - Vazquez was traded."
Isn't that the truth Rosenthal.
I don't agree with all the Brian Roberts nay-sayers. He is the missing piece. Someone tell me how the youth movement of Owens, Anderson, Getz, Lillibridge, Nix are going to help us in 2009? Who is added here that will bring us speed? yes, Owens is fast, but you can't steal first base. Roberts is proven who can hold it down until Beckham is ready. I also like Hudson, but he doesn't steal bases.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 07:30 PM
Missing piece to what? Roberts is a free agent after this year and you have plenty of cheap infield options right now. Gimme a break.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 07:32 PM
"Hahahaha the White Sox are in for a long year..."
Yeah signing a low risk back end of the rotation pitcher like Colon is terrible.
Get a clue.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 07:36 PM
Missing piece to higher OBP and more RUNS. Believe it or not tdogg that wins games, which means you don't have to claw your way into the playoffs moron.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 07:36 PM
Rosenthal should join Soxtalk, he would fit into that fountain of misinformation and know-it-alls well.
Posted by: OmegaMan | January 14, 2009 at 07:37 PM
duh. And what do you propose the team gives up for the honor of Roberts for 1 year, with Beckham in the minors and Getz capable of .700-.750 ops this year. Anybody can trade on their playstation moron.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 07:40 PM
I'd like to respond to the poster who keeps saying how we need Roberts and Abreu. Where are we going to put Abreu? He's not DH'ing or 1B, those are taken. His position RF is taken by Dye. LF is taken by CQ. CF is a maybe, but can Abreu even play CF? Negative. The sox need speed. Which means Jerry Owens or Anderson in center. Roberts could maybe be feasible, but the problem is this. Alexi at short, Dayan Viciedo at 3B, you have Getz and Betemit. Roberts would be nice, but we'd have to trade a top tier starter, namely Gavin Floyd, an up and coming star who won 17 games last year, for Roberts, who is in his contract year. This makes no sense at all.
Posted by: go white sox | January 14, 2009 at 07:42 PM
tdogg, the White Sox don't stand a chance with the Twins getting a year of experience. The Sox have 2 HUGE question marks in the pitching rotation and they are trying to fill one with Bartolo Colon? In that park. Hah! Their bullpen is average, and their offense relies on the long ball too much. Oh yea, not to mention the holes at 3B, 2B, and CF.
Posted by: 123456789 | January 14, 2009 at 07:46 PM
I don't see why people continue to bag on Owens. He shows real potential to be solid. I think he wins the center job and with the opportunity to play in the majors every day, he could turn out to be a solid leadoff man. He needs to work on taking walks, but he certainly has the potential to hit .280 - .300.
Lillibridge shows serious promise and could end up stealing the second base job. Living here in NC I know a lot of braves fans who were upset about losing him in the Vazquez trade.
Getz has proven that he is capable of getting on base when it counts, and has enough speed that he could fill in leading off in a pinch.
Anderson has had some issues with the bat, but if the rest of the lineup is hitting well, its worth having him on the team just for his defense.
I don't disagree that it would be nice to have Brian Roberts, but it doesn't make sense to give up what it would cost (Floyd) to get him.
At this time last year, nobody (including KW) could have predicted the silliness that became Carlos Quentin. There were those who thought he would do well, but keep in mind, he wasn't even expected to break camp with the major league squad, much less be an all star and a serious MVP candidate. There's no telling what this group of young players will become. That's the risk you take with young players. Maybe Owens or Getz will become a Brian Roberts type leadoff man. They both have speed similar to or greater than Roberts. Who knows. That's the beautiful thing about baseball. Nothing is a sure thing. Just ask the Detroit Tigers who at this time last year had already won the 2008 World Series.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 07:48 PM
For all those nay-sayers, see KW can make a big deal!
Posted by: CentralIllinoisSkippy | January 14, 2009 at 07:51 PM
123456789. Now where have I heard that before. Hmmmm. Oh yeah last year. The bullpen is avg? Huh? Last time I checked home runs score runs also. I am not saying they are a favorite but the Sox have plenty of good pieces.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 07:51 PM
People bag on Owens because he sucks. I agree with most of what you said though.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 07:55 PM
So we just settle for mediocrity this year go white sox? tdogg, have you ever heard of sign a player and offer an extension? I also believe Roberts could be a very nice DH once Beckham arrives. I am proposing Abreu only if Dye leaves to get us a marquee player. Sorry I didn't make that clearer. And yes, I think Abreu would be nice even if we have Dye, Thome, and Konerko. This means we can have Abreu or Dye play some 1st when Konerko has another brain fart this year. OR if we get tired of seeing Thome strike out in clutch situations, Abreu can spell him. I am tired of just getting by....I want some stability. I want a MLB ready pitcher. As a ticket holder, I think this is the least Kenny can do for me.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 07:55 PM
That's informative. Why does he suck. Keep in mind he has yet to play a full season in the majors, but still has a career .268 average and .321 OPB. Given those are not ideal numbers for a leadoff hitter, but with consistent playing time, I think those numbers go up. Also, he has a career ML fielding percentage of .991. That doesn't suck either.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:01 PM
I am a season ticket holder also and what you say makes no sense. WTF Roberts as a DH? You don't need to sign Roberts (he wouldnt anyway) to a extension. You have help on the way. Scouts think Beckham might be ready by July.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Aaron - Kenny had been salivating over Quentin for years, once he was deemed healthy there was no doubt that he would be on the field. In fact it was Rosenthal who drew Williams' ire recently when he said, "Williams was surprised to get the production out of Ramirez and Quentin." Williams responded, "No, Rosenthal was surprised, we knew what we had."
Posted by: southsider | January 14, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Would of rather signed Pedro Martinez or Freddy but wtf.. better than nothing. Sox need to trade Konerko for anything, sign either hudson/garland/sheets. theres many ways to make this team a favorite in the division but just need one trade and good fa signing.
2b-orlando hudson
ss-alexai ramirez
lf-carlos quentin
dh-jim thome
rf-jermaine dye
1b-josh fields
c-aj pierzynski
3b-lillibridge/betemit (not good)
cf-owens/anderson/wise
sp-buehrle/danks/floyd/garland/colon/richard
bp-jenks/linebrink/dotel/thorton/carrasco/
Posted by: B-Rye | January 14, 2009 at 08:05 PM
Not saying it is false, but I never read a scout saying Beckham could be ready by July.
Posted by: OmegaMan | January 14, 2009 at 08:09 PM
Aaron ummm okay, you want info?
Owens career OPS+ 66. In 07 his most ABs he had a ops under .650. Good God man that's horrible. In the outfield he has no great range and a popcorn arm. Is that enough info?
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:09 PM
I would be willing to bet that If you had asked KW about Quentin this time last year he would have said that he would be a valuable player, but he would not have mentioned an all star appearance or 30+ HR or 100 RBIs. He obviously thought he would be successful and eventually would figure to be a major player (hence the "not a player like Quentin.. Quentin" remark). My point is, that halfway through training camp Quentin was not slated to make the major league roster. Owens got hurt and it opened the door.
The thing is that with young players, you don't know when they will turn the corner if ever. Its a risk you take, but the reward can be a lot higher.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:09 PM
Several stories reference it in the rumors involving Roberts. You can google it.
Sickels rates him a B+ an advanced prospect who would be a A next year. Its not a stretch to think he arrives this year.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:17 PM
BS Aaron. Quentin was a stud in the minors, sidetracked by injuries. A healthy Quentin would have moved Owens sooner than later.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:20 PM
OPS is not nearly as significant a statistic for a leadoff hitter as OBP alone. He's not trying to hit doubles and triples. Now, given, that's still low, but to measure him by that stat alone is foolish. Jacoby Ellsbury had an OPS of .729 last year and he was a rookie of the year candidate leading of in the exact same role as Owens would fill.
As for his "lack of range" and popcorn arm, he has tons of speed, which can be trained into range, and his arm can be strengthened.
I'm not saying the kid is going to be an all star next year, I'm just saying that to write him off saying he "sucks" is inaccurate.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:20 PM
I think Sox should sign Sandy Alomar to be Colon's personal catcher.
Posted by: CentralIllinoisSkippy | January 14, 2009 at 08:28 PM
enough cracking jokes, i dont exactly love this signing but whatever i trust KW.
Posted by: Da Man | January 14, 2009 at 08:30 PM
"I'm just saying that to write him off saying he "sucks" is inaccurate."
.729 is a whole lot better than .650.
Ellsbury rates a +8 for corner and +1 for CF in Defense from Chone.
Owens +4 for corner -4 for CF.
And last year in the minors he coudn't even steal at a acceptable rate. And Ellsbury is 24.
Just stop it. Please.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Not necessarily tdogg. What we needed from the outfield was a leadoff hitter at spring training last year. We were hoping to get that from Owens. Everything I read up until the day Owens got hurt was that the outfield was going to be Owens in left, Swisher in center, and Dye in right, with Anderson on the bench. Whether that would have changed once the season had started has nothing to do with what I was talking about. The bottom line is that even people who really were behind Quentin last year could not have predicted he would have the season he had last year. It's not BS, its the truth. It's easy to disagree in hindsight, but go back and read the archived articles.
"Alexei Ramirez is available to start in center field, as are Carlos Quentin and Brian Anderson, both of whom will make the team due to Owens' injury. " (from the press release about Owens' injury).
http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080325&content_id=2457534&vkey=spt2008news&fext=.jsp&c_id=cws
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:31 PM
"Anderson has had some issues with the bat, but if the rest of the lineup is hitting well, its worth having him on the team just for his defense.Anderson has had some issues with the bat, but if the rest of the lineup is hitting well, its worth having him on the team just for his defense."
Exactly. Actually, even if your team isn't strong offensively, its fine to try to mitigate that offensive cost with good defense. As long as Anderson brings that plus glove, he's fine in CF. You don't need to have a plus offensive player at every position.
"The thing is that with young players, you don't know when they will turn the corner if ever. Its a risk you take, but the reward can be a lot higher."
I'm pretty sure Billy Beane is kicking himself right now for not accepting Quentin in the Haren deal (Quentin for Carter only happened b/c BB didn't want Quentin).
"Owens career OPS+ 66. In 07 his most ABs he had a ops under .650. Good God man that's horrible. In the outfield he has no great range and a popcorn arm. Is that enough info?"
Small. Sample. Size.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:34 PM
So his numbers aren't as good as a rookie of the year candidate and an established veteran in the field. That means he sucks? Wow, if that's the comparison then half the major leagues suck. The bottom line is his numbers aren't that far from the numbers that Pods put up in 2005 when we won the world series, and nobody was saying that Pods sucked then. If Owens is healthy, then I think he turns the corner this year. Before he got hurt last spring he was hitting somewhere around .360. He is capable of leadoff type hitting. His defense needs work, but that's what coaches are for.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:35 PM
Thanks rex for a little back up.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:36 PM
We went round and round about Owens last year on South Side. My point is, yes he was slated to start but...
A) He never stays healthy.
B) Quentin was always more talented and if his shoulder was healthy would make his way out of the minors or off the bench and into the lineup.
Owens is just not a good player. Im sorry that hurts your feelings, but facts are facts.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:39 PM
"Sickels rates him a B+ an advanced prospect who would be a A next year. Its not a stretch to think he arrives this year."
Just because a guy is rated as an "A" or a "B+" by Sickels doesn't mean he's MLB ready. Advanced means advanced for his age/pro ball experience. He's not MLB ready, or even close to it.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:39 PM
"Small. Sample. Size."
People his career minor league OPS is .718. He's 27. This is not a discussion.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:43 PM
"I think Sox should sign Sandy Alomar to be Colon's personal catcher." God what a mistake that was.
Posted by: quentin2 | January 14, 2009 at 08:44 PM
Now to the original article.
1. Great signing by the Sox. Low risk, high reward.
2. Can a Sox fan explain to me the reason why people aren't so high on Poreda sticking as a SP and possibly becoming a closer? Does he lack the plus pitches?
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:45 PM
You're not hurting my feelings, you're just wrong.
He has been injured once, as a matter of fact, he has a cleaner injury history than Quentin.
I'm not saying Quentin is not more talented than Owens, although he is not the same type of hitter. My point is that to say that Owens sucks is premature. He is unproven, but has the potential to be a productive starter in the majors. Maybe he'll never be a Carl Crawford or Jacoby Ellsbury, but neither was Podsednik and he was certainly a good enough leadoff man to help us win a world series.
Its about what the team needs, not having an all star at every position.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Rex. I don't disagree about the Sickels. I just said what I read.
"He's not MLB ready, or even close to it."
I don't know if I buy that. The Sox were pretty impressed with Gordon in the AFL. He might get an opportunity this year and will definitely arrive in 2010.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:48 PM
And offense isn't everything. Owens is +13 runs in CF. I'm not saying that Owens should be the primary starting CF. I'm just saying that the internal options in Anderson, Wise, and Owens can compete for the CF spot. Acquiring a CF is not a "must". Since SS is a more defensively demanding position than CF and Lillibridge is a plus defensive SS, I could see him shifting to CF as well if needed. If the Sox acquire Roberts or Orlando Hudson, I could see Lillibridge shifted to CF.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:48 PM
Rex,
The concern with Poreda is that he only has a couple of pitches beside his very good fastball. He would probably need to develop another offspeed pitch in order to fit into a starting role. I think he will make the pen this year, and work on developing a pitch or two during his side sessions.
He certainly has the fastball to be a strong setup man or closer.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:50 PM
"I don't know if I buy that. The Sox were pretty impressed with Gordon in the AFL. He might get an opportunity this year and will definitely arrive in 2010."
It's the AFL. You just don't rush a prospect up from A ball. That could get him up in AA early next season or maybe an AAA promotion late-season, but there is NO way an impressive AFL performance gets him into the bigs in '09. Very, VERY few prospects are in the bigs that soon.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:50 PM
I don't have a problem with Anderson in CF. I just want production offensive or defensive. Where are you seeing Owens +13?
The team will know more about Poreda this spring, but the Sox are still very much looking at him as a starter. Outside opinion keeps mentioning reliever long term. His secondary pitches do need work however.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Just found it, Poreda has a fastball (near the 100 mph mark) a slider and a changeup. He's working on a curve.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Aaron-
Thanks for info. Obviously, Poreda is much more valuable in the rotation than in the pen. If Sox brass thinks that he could cut it as a starter, he needs to be starting in AAA.
It will be much easier for him to develop, refine, and incorporate that pitch into his repetoire if he's doing it in Charlotte as opposed to developing the pitch in side sessions in the Sox bullpen.
Again, I don't see how keeping a prospect in the minors longer so he can refine his skills is a bad idea. The upside of Poreda as a starter is worth it IMO. And, starter to reliever conversions almost always work out better than reliever to starter conversions.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Owens is +13 defensively. Granted that he loses some of that value with his bat.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Regarding Beckham. I guess we'll see huh.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 09:01 PM
And finally before I turn in Aaron. I let it go several times but Pods is not why the White Sox won in 05. Not even close.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Tdogg, you are very defensive. Aaron you make very good comments, keep it up, you too rex! However, Owens is not good. He basically played a full year a couple years back and we saw a terrible OBP and lack of plate discipline.
Back to Roberts...tdogg you are being too one dimensional to respond to my comments. I agree fully that Floyd for Roberts is a mistake. However, we must have some prospects to make the O's happy. I say sign him to an extension and have him DH in the future when Jim "I clog bases" Thome is gone. That way you now have a basestealer, OBP guy as your DH for once. DH doesn't have to be a power guy.
Also, Beckham has NEVER been slated as ready by July. This will not happen, mark it down, you heard it here.
Since you are so smart tdogg, tell me how the White Sox have resolved their need for speed? Exactly, they haven't. Yes, they may have gotten a bit younger....with players that wont be here in 2 years (Lillibridge, Owens, Getz, Nix, etc.) But, if you want my Stadium Club 300 Level VIP passes let me know, because I think I will be selling them.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 09:11 PM
I didn't say podsednik was the reason we won, but he was clearly good enough to be the leadoff man. There were a lot of reasons why we won, four of which were in the rotation. That team was a small ball team however, and without a leadoff man, a small ball team doesn't work.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 09:16 PM
Amen Aaron....finally some sense on this board. I saw Pods signed a minor league deal today....I think I would have at least invited him to spring training for a crack at the team. Perhaps an upgrade to Owens.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 09:19 PM
I still think what we saw from Owens in Spring Training last year before he got hurt was encouraging. I think he has a pretty good year this year leading off in either center or left (depending on whether Dye gets traded or not).
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Im not defensive, just realistic. You dont extend Roberts to be a DH, regardless if Beckham is close to ready or not. And have you paid attention to rumors surrounding Roberts for the past 2+ years? Crackhead nation for what they want for Roberts.
Speed only matters if its somewhat talented. The Cell is not turning into Petco Park. I want people that can get on base. Period. I think you will be pleasantly surprised with Getz this year.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Oh yeah, I have extremely high hopes for Getz. I would be seriously surprised to see Beckham in the majors in 09. I think he could be seen as early as '10, but not this year. However, we're just going to have to disagree on Owens. I think the guy has promise, and if he's healthy he has a productive year.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 09:27 PM
So we haven't resolved the speed issue that was clearly a problem last year. Ok, I gotcha. I can give Getz some time, but I don't like Owens. Roberts isn't the be-all end all. Let's get creative and get some scrappy guys in here that can run the bases though. So far I haven't seen that. Bottom line....not much has been done to get excited on the South Side.
Posted by: ChiSox6 | January 14, 2009 at 09:27 PM
The White Sox were not a small ball team in 05. That is one of the biggest falsehoods in the Chicago media. They were and have always been a long ball team in the Cell's revamped park. Pods was decent in the 1st half of 05, but was non existent after that.
Get over this notion of lead off batter. It happens only once.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 09:28 PM
Since Roberts is a hot topic, how about Roberts for Poreda + Lillibridge?
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 09:38 PM
uhhh no.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 09:42 PM
Actually the guys who hit before the middle of your order (you're RBI guys) usually come up to bat four or five times a game. That's significantly more than once.
Any team that hits the ball in the Cell is going to hit a lot of home runs. What made the Sox a small ball team that year in comparison with other years was that they played strong defense, hit when they needed to hit, bunted well, and pitched well. If that team had played anywhere else, they would have been considered a small ball team.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 09:46 PM
It's actually better than Roberts for Floyd. Floyd will stick in the bigs, even if its as a #4-5 type guy.
Right now, Floyd has more value than Poreda.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 14, 2009 at 09:48 PM
Right now, yes Floyd has more value. However, looking to the future of the rotation, Floyd projects as at best a #3 rotation guy. Give Poreda a couple of years and he could be an ace. I'm not saying he will be, but the possibility is there. He is hands down our number one pitching prospect, and likely a future 1-3 rotation pitcher. We don't have another guy like that in the farm. We have tons of 3-5 guys.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 09:53 PM
really how do people say dye is inconsistent look at the stats over the last 5 years dye has the most home runs and most rbis of any al outfielder
Posted by: 05CHISOX | January 14, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Sigh.
There are plenty of lineup studies available. Again your fixation on lead off is overstated in regards to speed.
Strong defense has nothing to do with small ball offense. They did not bunt well and their RISP OPS was a grand total of .02 than the season total.
The 05 team was built on pitching and defense with an occasional (actually probable) long ball.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 10:03 PM
In fact Ozzie tends to waste too many abs bunting with guys who don't do it well.
Yeah Floyd has more value now but no way we give up Poreda for 1 year of Roberts.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Decent signing. People please stop overrating Aaron Poreda.
And I'm glad I'm not the only one hoping for Sheets.
Posted by: astralpanda | January 14, 2009 at 10:14 PM
I'm not a big fan of Owens. He hasn't developed into a constistent,lead off guy yet. The thing that turns me off from Owens is his age. Off the top of my head, I believe he is 29 which makes you wonder if he ever develops, how old will he be and will his speed stick with him. So I hope Owens pulls through this year, but he is by no means the future at CF.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | January 14, 2009 at 10:17 PM
Leadoff hitters don't have to be fast. It's a bonus, but not a necessity. There are two important things to a leadoff hitter. OBP and smart base running. If your leadoff man has good speed, then going from first to third on a single becomes a possibility for example.
Small ball is all about aggression and getting runs however possible, so as not to have to rely on the long ball. Bunting is part of that, as is aggressive baserunning, and timely hitting, all of which the Sox focused on in 2005. In comparison to any other year, the 2005 Sox were a small ball team. In a pitcher's park, they would have been a small ball team.
You're example of RISP OPS actually supports my point. Look at their RISP batting average. They weren't after the extra base hit. You put too much emphasis on OPS.
Pitching and defense are obviously not part of small ball offense, but they make it much easier to succeed as a small ball team (or any kind of team for that matter). Ozzie and Williams have always believed that, and that particular year it showed.
Show me a lineup study that says the number 1 hitter is not important. With the way modern lineups are setup, the numbers 3-5 spots tend to be the guys relied upon to drive in runs. If there is nobody on base for them to drive in, then they can't do their job.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 14, 2009 at 10:21 PM
I see Poreda getting moved up and given a shot this year as soon as Richard struggles. Richard has potential but I am skeptical if he will ever pan out. Poreda on the other hand seems as if he will be a good 3 maybe even 2 for the Sox in the future.
Posted by: Tough | January 14, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Aaron what are you talking about? Their BA difference was .03
I never said leadoff is unimportant. I said you overstate speed in regards to it. Of course OBP is what matters.
The teams that understand OBP don't get caught up in this small ball garbage.
I give up goodnight.
Posted by: tdogg | January 14, 2009 at 10:50 PM
Nick........who did the Tigers sign that were so "marquee"
if you're thinking Miggy Cab. and Willis, they TRADED for them
Posted by: I Like Baseball | January 14, 2009 at 11:12 PM