MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Stark On Andruw, Swisher, Hudson, Pedro | Main | Odds and Ends: Hudson, Twins, Sisco, Dunn »

Rangers Rumors: Red Sox Pitching, Andruw

A few Rangers notes from MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan...

  • The Rangers weren't able to pry Clay Buchholz loose from the Red Sox back when they were actively looking for a catcher.  But, Sullivan says the Rangers "still like many pitchers in the Red Sox organization."  Michael Bowden, Nick Hagadone, and Daniel Bard are Boston's other top pitching prospects.
  • The Rangers worked out Andruw Jones but with their crowded outfield they "just don't see a fit right now."
  • Sullivan looks at various pitchers who've had flexor tendon surgery - Andy Pettitte, Victor Zambrano, and Jason SchmidtJason Jennings hopes to return strong this year after two such surgeries in recent years.


Comments

I still have a feeling the Sox are going to make a move for one of the Rangers catchers.

yeah maybe now they apply reasonable pricetags to their catchers.

I don't blame the Rangers at all for trying to get Buccholz. If Varitek didn't re-sign, they might have had a chance. They now have much less leverage now that 'Tek is back and Sheets needs surgery. Boston will get a good deal if they do trade which is why I think both sides will go into the season as is. This has the makings of a mid-season trade to me.

I hope there is no trade with the Red Sox unless Buchholz is part of it and Salty is the other. If the Rangers were to give in and send Teagarden to the Red Sox for some other pitcher, it'd be a lopsided trade in favor of the Red Sox and the Rangers would be giving away their best option at catcher. All this because the Red Sox still are sore from the Gagne trade. Let the Red Sox look elsewhere for a catcher or they need to be the ones to give in. Period.

Bowden + Carter for Teagarden is more like it

my error, i ment bowden + hagadone. carter was for another scenario that i ended up not liking.

if we are giving up two top 10 team prospects, you bet your butt we want the guy you dont want to give up

I don't think the Rangers have lost leverage. They have consistently said that if the deal was right they would take it. Otherwise, they wouldn't move anyone.

Also, I have to think that the Sheets signing was independent of any trade speculation with the Red Sox. It wasn't another option if something didn't pan out. I'm sure the Rangers FO best possible outcome for this offseason would have been to sign Sheets AND trade for Buchholz.

Honestly,

Bowden and Hagadone is way too much for any of their catchers.

They all have limited upside, while the potential of that Boston duo is huge. Bowden is a potential 2/3 with a fairly high probability, and Hagadone has ace potential, but is furthur away and coming off surgery.

I think Bowden for Salty straight up would be a reasonable deal.

I've heard Bowden's numbers aren't that of a more flyball pitcher. I don't think that the Rangers will go after that.

I've also heard Bowden's ceiling is more of a solid 3. I think the Rangers have more than a glut of those types. Pass.

The end of MadmanTX's comment is pretty much what I think is wrong with most trade discussions. Ideally, it should be about both teams feeling they get fair value and addressing needs. Sure, part of that value has to do with need, but to state that one side has to "give in" is just silly.

How far off are Exposito/Brown? Dusty spent some time in AAA last year, if I recall. I know he projects more as a backup, but the potential to platoon is there, maybe.

I'd say at this point, with Varitek back on the roster and a couple of prospects on the way, Boston's catching needs are less dire than Texas's pitching needs. Theo Epstein's a shrewd enough negotiator to know his team's strengths and weaknesses and not overpay. I think if there's a deal here, it will not be terrifically lopsided either way.

yeah right

why is buchholz so untouchable? I watch a lot of baseball and had that guy on my fantasy team for a while last year and the year before, not that great so far. Lots of hype though, thats the only thing you can count on. Not even close to being on the same planet as Lester. Also, Varitek is a spare and thoroughly washed up.

I don't see how Boston's catching needs are less dire than Texas' pitching needs. The Rangers have the #1 farm system according to every scout and expert I've heard from and are stacked with young pitchers. They do not need another SP#3 ceiling.

Boston has pretty much zero in the way of major catching prospects and they know 'Tek is pretty much done as an offensive player.

Also the Rangers have recently regretted moving guys just because they had a glut of that position (Adrian Gonzalez and Carlos Pena sent packing on the cheap because they had Teixiera). I seriously doubt they intend to make that mistake again. Plus its the AL so even if they keep all three and 2 of them pan out they can rotate between DH and C and save the wear and tear.

I am not saying it will not happen without Buchholz, but it will have to be a very sweet deal if he is not included.

"Sullivan says the Rangers "still like many pitchers in the Red Sox organization.""

Translation: Hey, hey, don't go away mad. We were just kidding about Buchholz. Don't leave us here with three catchers and no pitching.

"Let the Red Sox look elsewhere for a catcher or they need to be the ones to give in. Period."

Yeah, yeah. Enjoy another sub-.500 season with that pitching staff.

This thing is over Texas keep your catchers, Boston will keep its pitchers. If Theo thought for one second that Texas catchers were the right match, he would have moved Bucholz.
Hagadone and Bowden will never get done. This trade if done will during season or trade deadline.

Will the never-ending soap opera surrounding Boston and the Rangers' catchers ever end? If the Sox decide Bucholtz is tradable they can do better than what Texas is offering. Would like to see them look into Iannetta of the Rockies. He's a big step up from the Texas Trio (Salty/Teagarden/Ramirez) and since the Rocks already have Yorvit T. and need starting pitching then Buchholtz and a decent prospect (maybe even a catcher) might get it done. Why settle for hamburg when you can have steak?

I hope the yankees keep signing players out from under boston. I hate both teams but the boston bandwagon party makes me sick. Manny to the yanks

Teagarden and salty are way better than Ianetta. He's more of a spam than a steak

If Nick Hagadone comes back healthy I expect big things from him. Before his surgery, he looked nearly major-league ready although he was at a low level. He has much potential as anyone in the organization.

Quality for quality, RedSox fans. You cannot get something for free.

I'll confess I don't know much about C. Buccholz. Can someone from Boston comment on what were his issues last season? Obviously his AAA #s were real strong, outside of not averaging 5 innings per start, but the major league sampling seemed rather large for the results to be so poor.

Anyway, I don't expect a trade prior to the season starting. I think they would like to evaluate both Salty and Teagarden longer themselves. Bigger issue is 2009 is pretty much a write off for the Rangers while our best prospects probably won't arrive until the 2nd half of the season. They don't have serious expectations of contending so there's no real pressure to get a deal done right away.

I'd say at this point, with Varitek back on the roster and a couple of prospects on the way, Boston's catching needs are less dire than Texas's pitching needs. Theo Epstein's a shrewd enough negotiator to know his team's strengths and weaknesses and not overpay. I think if there's a deal here, it will not be terrifically lopsided either way.


WHAT?? Just like the Gagne trade....

#3 in Harrison
Starting OF in Murphy
and TWO top ten prospects in the Rangers farm system (which is #1 by far in baseball) in Feliz and Beltre

Yup, that Theo is one shrewd negotiator.

Buchholz walks a lot of people in the process of striking them out. His WHIP is nearly 2 and he hasnt had a lot of luck pitching deep or even into the 6 inning of games. I dont see where he's that much, if any, better than bard, bowden, and hagadone. He's not Lester and we can all agree on that.

Feliz is off the Braves deal but still a great trade for a bum like gagne

I'm tired of Boston thinking that it has all the chips in this poker game of a trade. It's not always about player value, but player value to that team. Boston is looking to win now so they will move pieces to help them win NOW (hence taking a slightly bad deal to win the title). The Rangers are looking for their future so why would they give up a piece of the future for a possible bust? The deal must be sweet for the Rangers. They know if they hold on to things then they will be a perennial threat down the road.

RSD, did you really bring that up. Come on, Daniels was on his 2nd month on the job at 28 years old, and traded with Kevin Towers a 10 year man at the time. Come on, thats like taking candy from a baby man. That deal was a learning exprinece for Daniels, he wont make the same mistake twice (at least and still have a job), he learned from it. He traded from a position of strength, a got a pitcher that was who went a 11-5 and more importantly to the Rangers, only allowed 14 home runs. Chris Young could not pitch at Texas Ballpark, since he is a flyball pitcher. In hindsight that deal looks bad for the Rangers, but at the time it made prefect sense (thought admittedly in SD people where thinking thank god).

As for the Rangers and their catchers, its fair to ask a steep price if you have no intention of moving them at the moment. The market sucks, and they have pieces under their control why would they move them unless they have to, even for prospects. As for this season, I think they realize they can not compete with the Angels and A's, so why not wait a year and see what turns out.

I believe the Rangers will surprise people this year. I'm not saying they will make the playoffs but they will give the AL West a run for its money.

"Teagarden and salty are way better than Ianetta."

Ummm yeah, and pigs fly on Christmas Eve.

"Buchholz walks a lot of people in the process of striking them out. His WHIP is nearly 2 and he hasnt had a lot of luck pitching deep or even into the 6 inning of games. I dont see where he's that much, if any, better than bard, bowden, and hagadone."

Of course. In fact thats exactly why the Sox management has made him untouchable so far...he stinks. I hear they're thinking of releasing him next week to sign Sidney Ponson. Read the scouting reports, dude, except for his peabrain immaturity the guy's a studmeister with a baseball. Now if only he'll grow up and they don't mess his head with more with delivery mechanics tinkering and armslot adjustments he'll be fine, an ace according to the experts' concensus. Is that worth a topnotch catcher in trade? Bet your salty teagarden it is...and then some.

Like the man says, you need to trade something to get something. Bucholtz should get the Sox ALOT on the trade block.

"As for the Rangers and their catchers, its fair to ask a steep price if you have no intention of moving them at the moment."

The problem with that is that there's only a limited time they have the advantage. Next year, mauer and others will be available next year, and who do you think the bosox will take, mauer or salty? The bosox are saving up lots of cash this year so they can throw it at mauer next year, and they can outbid everybody (except the yanks, but they're stuck with posada for a few more years, at really big bucks).

goomba, Mauer is not going to be a FA until after 2010, thats two years. Next year they can have a pick of two of the Molina brothers, and a couple of others, like Castro/Blanco/Schneider and maybe Ramon Hernandez/Yorvit Torrealba/Victor Martinez if their options are declined.

So the only way that Mauer is a Red Sox in 2010 is if they trade for him. And that would cost a pretty penny to say the least, and thats if the Twins don't come to terms with him.

So no, I dont think its a bad time to wait for a year. Its a risk true, but the pay off is worth it. They know the the catching on the market is not going to be the same value a their young catchers, when next years market will have an average age over 30.

"I'll confess I don't know much about C. Buccholz. Can someone from Boston comment on what were his issues last season?"

He threw a no hitter in 2007, but last year he just had a meltdown and got shelled almost every game he pitched. In interviews on NESN TV he said he felt OK and couldn't explain what went wrong. He just seemed emotionally spent, you know, like watching his dreams of millions going down the toilet, just dazed and confused.

The sox sent him back to the minors and he rebounded and pitched much better. Bottom line: I think the pressure of his no-hitter was weighing on his mind, thinking he had to live up to that standard all the time, and he just freaked. He is a really good pitcher, but if he can't get his head straight, he'll just implode. And that's the million dollar question, "can he develop the mental toughness to pitch in the majors?"

Nobody knows for sure. But we won't have to wait long to find out: he'll get some big league starts this year for certain and all questions will be answered. I can't wait to see what happens, but I'm pretty sure it will be either champ or chump and nothing in between. Stay tuned, boys and girls, this will be exciting, he has all the physical skills required to be an ace.

Lock

Buchholz is an future ace if hype and redsox propaganda are all that matter. He could be a strong major league pitcher and I'd love to have him on the Rangers but trading a Teagarden/Salty for him isn't outrageous, which is my point here. That and I dont think he's that much better than Bard, Hagadone, or Bowden. The type of player you are describing is David Price, Kershaw, or someone like that who dominates in the minors then carries that over to the bigs. He's no better than Phil Hughes on a good day.

"Mauer is not going to be a FA until after 2010, thats two years."

Ok, 2 years, but he's worth waiting for, so I don't expect the sox to settle for less. They'll sign someone as a temporary fix, if need be (like Tek hitting .200 LOL).

And no way is mauer signing with the twins, all the interviews I've seen with him almost screamed he's going to test the free agent market.

if i hear anymore of you redsox people that think there is a chance you get mauer i am going to go crazy. like the other guys are saying he isnt a fa till 2010 and by the way he is from minnesota and the twins arent going to let him get away. so keep dreaming. i know a bucholtz trade is not going to happen. but the worst thing for that kid was to throw that no-hitter. he will prob end up liek ankiel. he needs a change of location to a smaller market.

i say trade maxram for ryan tucker and split time with tea and salty then if you can get a haul for one at the trade deadline do it.

"Buchholz is an future ace if hype and redsox propaganda are all that matter. ....... He's no better than Phil Hughes on a good day."

I watch both the sox and the yanks, and I've seen every game both these guys have played. But you seem to know best, that no hitter was a pretty good day for Clay, so do tell us when Phil has pitched a no hitter.

As a CT resident, I like both teams pretty equally, and I'm not biased against one or the other. However, after the sox and yanks, they're all insignificant. So, I'm telling you from all I've seen, Clay is the better pitcher. But at the same time, this will be the year for the yanks - if the new hires perform to expectations, and I think they will... so that means Rays to 3rd place, or worse... exactly where they belong.

Goomba, I still think the Twins are going to hammer out a deal with Mauer, but time will tell on that front. As for the Red Sox getting him and outbidding everyone else, I might note the Jorge will have 1 year and 13 million on his contract at that time. Now that should be an entertaining battle to watch.

As for my point before, the Rangers don't have to rush this trade, they have time to wait at the moment. And say some other teams want a young catcher, well they know where to look. Its not a question of the Red Sox and Rangers, it question of the Rangers and the teams in need of catching. Cause I think the Rangers are aware they are waiting for the talent in the minors to be ready before trying to compete.

"but the worst thing for that kid was to throw that no-hitter. he will prob end up liek ankiel. he needs a change of location to a smaller market."

That could be very very true. We'll know by the all star break.

"Goomba, I still think the Twins are going to hammer out a deal with Mauer, but time will tell on that front. As for the Red Sox getting him and outbidding everyone else, I might note the Jorge will have 1 year and 13 million on his contract at that time. Now that should be an entertaining battle to watch."

Every time the twins played in boston last year, guess who the media bimbos interviewed after the game? Yup, mauer, every single game. And every time they brought up his free agency, and he wasn't even coy about it, he said it's something he "intends on exploring."

I guess it's possible the yanks would bid on mauer, and if the yanks do outbid the sox for mauer, I'd be cool with that too. But as far as staying with the twins: no way.

Goomba,

I knew the Phil Hughes comment would create a stir. But minus his no hitter, he's been average at very best, which is about where phil hughes is as well. Buchholz having issues w/ his mechanics, control, and composure could really hinder his career, that has kept many before him from reaching their potential. He's not some 20 year old lefty w/ a golden arm about to pop on the scene. He's a 24-25 righty who has pitched in the majors on and off the last 2 years w/ limited success (minus the outlier no no that apparently makes him Jon Lester). I stay to my point that he's not more desirable than some of the other guys who the Rangers have talked about w/ the redsox. It's shi* or get off the pot time for Clay Buchholz.

"but the worst thing for that kid was to throw that no-hitter. he will prob end up liek ankiel. he needs a change of location to a smaller market."

That could be very very true. We'll know by the all star break.


Alright, we agree on something

i am guessing something will get doen between these 2 before the deadline. it will be either salty or tea and something else for one or two of buch, bowden, bard, hagadone.

"But minus his no hitter, he's been average at very best, which is about where phil hughes is as well."

Not true. In 2007, Clay was awesome, just freaking awesome. The only reason the sox took him out is because he'd pitched too many total innings and they were afraid of fatiguing his arm. It was actually Lester who seemed like he would fall apart. Of course, things reversed in 2008, Clay went in the toilet and Lester looked like an ace.

Same thing on the yanks with Joba and Phil. In the first game Joba started, he got blown out, just crushed, lasted only about 3 innings, but he did pretty well after that... Phil not so much, he looked good in only a couple games, and never dominated in the majors.

Joba, Lester and Clay are top tier... Phil is below them. He needs at least another year in the minors before we see for sure what he's made of, but he won't get it because the yanks will start him to give someone else in the rotation a rest (or for an injunry). I'm not holding my breath for anything amazing, while for Clay, I wouldn't be surprized if regained his 2007 form.

I like Hagadone, but the others have holes in their game. The Ranger are probably better off getting a couple of pitchers like Hagadone and Hand. Maybe a couple of position players like Westmoreland and Casey Kelly hoping that one turns out to be an above average player.

I like Hagadone, but the others have holes in their game. The Ranger are probably better off getting a couple of pitchers like Hagadone and Hand. Maybe a couple of position players like Westmoreland and Casey Kelly hoping that one turns out to be an above average player.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.