« Odds & Ends: Gregerson, Hanley, Strasburg |
Main
| Padres Sign Shawn Hill »
By Tim Dierkes [March 23, 2009 at 12:07pm CST]
12:07pm: John Fay of the Cincinnati Enquirer asked Reds GM Walt Jocketty about Gammons' Harang note. Jocketty said, "I'm not going to comment on something when he doesn't know what he's talking about."
9:19am: ESPN's Peter Gammons had a new blog post yesterday discussing available players.
- Gammons names Geoff Jenkins ($8MM remaining, limited no-trade), Brian Giles ($9MM remaining, full no-trade), Gary Matthews Jr. ($33.5MM remaining, full no-trade), Marcus Thames ($2.275MM salary), Nick Johnson ($5.5MM salary), Jason Repko, and Jeff Baker as players being dangled. Gammons links Matthews to the Yankees but admits his contract will be an issue.
- Mark Teahen has drawn interest from the Astros, Red Sox, and Yankees.
- Gammons says the Reds "have let teams know that they will wait and see whether they need to move Aaron Harang during the season." It'd be a shame to see the Reds break up that rotation. Harang has about $36MM coming to him over the next three seasons if his 2011 option is exercised.
- Brewers third baseman Bill Hall expects his team to pursue Padres ace Jake Peavy if available this summer. Unlike C.C. Sabathia, Peavy is more than a rental.
Yes ace level pitcher signed for mid level dollars. If the Reds decide they have to move him I don't ever want to hear them complain about not being able to field a winner again.
Posted by: schellis | March 23, 2009 at 09:38 AM
You know it could be more than just money regarding Harang. Maybe the Reds recognize that he is on the down swing and the best time to get the most in return for him would be now/this season before everyone else realizes.
Posted by: basicslop | March 23, 2009 at 09:53 AM
I'm a lifelong Reds fan and, outside of Jim Bowden (who never really spoke--or cared to speak--for anyone other than Jim Bowden) I have literally never heard the organization complain about being able to field a winner. Like any small market team, I think they recognize that the margin for error is way smaller than with a New York team. But they also know you can build from within, make smart trades and still compete. (aka not follow the Jim Bowden model of assembling a team of 25 "toolsy" outfielders who can't actually play baseball)
Posted by: garjr17 | March 23, 2009 at 09:58 AM
Brewers in on Peavy? Sorry Bill, but I think they traded all their young talent last year to get CC.
Posted by: RoyHobbs | March 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM
If the Reds move Harang b/c there not winning this year I'm done with em. If you need to trade a veteran pitcher with a big contract move Arroyo, or even Cordero. Guys that can be replaced, not a guy signed to a cheap deal. This would be especially pathetic if it was a move to get prospects, and not MLB level talent. All I hear from this teams fans and management is all the talent that will make it to the bigs in the next two years to join the young talent that is already there. Trading Harang now for prospects would seem to indicate the exact opposite.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | March 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM
"Brewers in on Peavy? Sorry Bill, but I think they traded all their young talent last year to get CC"
Was going to ask here if the Brew-crew has any top OF/Pitching in AAA they could swap. Peavy would be nearly as good as CC anyway.
PLEASE Boston.. Stay away from Teahan, he looked in the WBC as lost at the plate as I remembered him in the games saw him in last season.
Posted by: johns | March 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
I don't think Milwaukee traded all their young talent, but they may not necessarily have what San Diego would want in return, which is big league-ready starting pitching prospects (that and, I don't really think Milwaukee is on the list of teams Peavy would waive his NTC for). But that wouldn't be the first instance of Hall being delusional; he's already got delusions of being an everyday major league third baseman.
Posted by: Pinky29 | March 23, 2009 at 10:42 AM
I don't think Milwaukee traded all their young talent, but they may not necessarily have what San Diego would want in return, which is big league-ready starting pitching prospects (that and, I don't really think Milwaukee is on the list of teams Peavy would waive his NTC for). But that wouldn't be the first instance of Hall being delusional; he's already got delusions of being an everyday major league third baseman.
Posted by: Pinky29 | March 23, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Brewers in on Peavy? Sorry Bill, but I think they traded all their young talent last year to get CC.
Posted by: RoyHobbs | March 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Roy,
I'm actually going to totally disagree with what you said. While I don't think the Brewers will trade for Peavy simply because they probably can't afford him and should be somewhere around 10 games behind the Cubs by trading deadline, but I believe they still have more then enough prospects to trade for him.
I'm sure I'm going to have a certain fan base that is going to disagree with me, and thats cool. But I'll present the facts...
Assuming the padres and cubs were somewhat close to the trade, or at the very least talked about it, (which I think is pretty hard to argue against) and what the cubs supposed package was going to be Vitters, possibly Cedeno at the time, Marshall,another mid level prospect, Pie or Garret Olson (can't be both cause they were traded for each other) I would say based on what the Brewers still have in their farm system they easily have the prospects in their system and could put together a deal that would be twice as good as anything the cubs could offer.
Per baseball america, The cubs have two prospects in the top 100. Josh Vitters at 51 and Jeff Samardzjia at 79.
The Brewers have 4. Alcides Escobar at 19, who's arguably the top ss prospect in baseball and would be a perfect fit since they lost Greene. They also have Mat Gamel at 34. A 3B which is the same position Josh Vitters plays and Gamel is ranked higher. 81 a cather named Brett Lawrie, and number 100 a pitcher named Jeffrey Jeffress. Don't know alot about those 2 guys, but I do know that there aren't a whole lot of catchers ranked in the top 100.
The cubs were also supposedly offering Sean Marshall in the deal...nice pitcher, probably will do a nice job this year, but he's probably a 4 or 5 starter. The Brewers could offer either Manny Parra or Carlos Villanueva, who are around the same age, and Parra especially has a ton more upside then Sean Marshall.
My point isn't that the Brewers will try to trade for Peavy cause I don't think they will. My point was assuming the rumors were true and the names we heard being exchanged by the cubs were true,and the padres were at least thinknig of making the deal..not only do the brewers have enough to trade for Peavy, they could put together an offer that would be heads and tails better then anything the cubs could put together. This argument is strictly based on talent and nothing to do with money because I also know the one thing the cubs will do is pick up the rest of Peavy's contract and the Brewers won't which is another reason Peavy won't be in Milwaukee.
Posted by: xxgochisox09 | March 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM
I want to clarify one thing I said above... there actually are 11 catchers ranked in the top 100, but according to baseball america, some are expected to be moved to a different position
Posted by: xxgochisox09 | March 23, 2009 at 11:10 AM
It's official: Gammons is ready for the home!
Why on earth would the Yankees be considering Matthews Jr?? He's 35 coming off knee surgery...with an obscene contract...and has now been demoted to a 5th oufielder spot despite making 10 mill per, because he couldn't hit a beach ball last year. At this point is his career, I'd take Melky over him, let alone Gardner. PASS!!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | March 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM
I don't understand the logic in thinking about trading away Harang. As Grizzly said, the two pitchers I'd see on the chopping block ahead of Harang if it's money problems would be Cordero or Arroyo.
Posted by: BankStreetGrounds | March 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM
"Brewers third baseman Bill Hall expects his team to pursue Padres ace Jake Peavy if available this summer. Unlike C.C. Sabathia, Peavy is more than a rental."
Really Bill? Did you forget that Peavy has a no trade claus and has to approve the team? You know what Bill - I want a toliet made of gold but its just not in the cards now is it.
Posted by: Fuka-don't-me | March 23, 2009 at 12:30 PM
BankStreetGrounds, I imagine the thinking is that Harang has some value right now, so there would be a market for him. The guys you mention won't / don't have a market. Arroyo doesn't have positive value, and there's no market for a pricey closer who would only have a handful of potential teams as destination spots because of his salary.
xxgochisox09, Lowrie is now a 2B, and it's unclear whether he'll stick there defensively. Your point is right -- the Brewers have assets they could move for peavy if they really wanted him -- but that's true of probably 70% of the teams in baseball. It's doubtful the Brewers will trade Escobar, they don't have much in the way of pitching prospects outside of one high-beta guy in Jeffress, and it's a silly debate in the first place, because we're treating Bill Hall's off-the-cuff B.S.ing with Gammons like it means something in terms of when the Brewers are thinking, when it doesn't.
Posted by: robdeer | March 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Haha, gettem Walt. He's right, Gammons is just speculating and has no idea what he's talking about. That's funny though.
Posted by: PWHjort | March 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Repko still has minor league options. The more likely Dodgers trade piece would be Delwynn Young.
Posted by: GScott | March 23, 2009 at 01:32 PM
Gamel+Escobar+Odorizzi for Peavy is the best offer any team has put forward so far, and would completely blow ANY deal the Cubs could make out of the water.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | March 23, 2009 at 01:38 PM
Hey Fuka-don't me,
Ed McMahon has a gold toilet for sale...
http://www.hulu.com/superbowl/55610/super-bowl-xliii-ads-cash4goldcom-heeeres-money
Posted by: DemSoxRoch | March 23, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Huh? The Brewers have tons of young talent. The only "top" prospects that they lost in the CC deal were LaPorta and Brantley. The others weren't top prospects. The Tribe got more for Santana then they did Sabathia.
Some combination of Gamel, Escobar, Jeffries, Lawrie, and Salome should easily get Peavy. Not all of those guys, obviously, but 3 of them. I think Jeffries has to be in any deal, as the Padres NEED pitching more than anything.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 23, 2009 at 02:13 PM
I agree with gochisox09...however no way the brewers get rid of escobar. JJ will go before Escobar. I don't see the brewers getting rid of one of their best pitchers(parra) for a huge Peavy contrat. Brewers front office knows what their doing....bill hall should worry about Gamel...not Peavy.
Posted by: cubbieblue | March 23, 2009 at 02:16 PM
"...bill hall should worry about Gamel...not Peavy. "
Gamel isn't/won't be a third baseman.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 23, 2009 at 02:26 PM
xxgochisox09, Lowrie is now a 2B, and it's unclear whether he'll stick there defensively. Your point is right -- the Brewers have assets they could move for peavy if they really wanted him -- but that's true of probably 70% of the teams in baseball. It's doubtful the Brewers will trade Escobar, they don't have much in the way of pitching prospects outside of one high-beta guy in Jeffress, and it's a silly debate in the first place, because we're treating Bill Hall's off-the-cuff B.S.ing with Gammons like it means something in terms of when the Brewers are thinking, when it doesn't.
Posted by: robdeer | March 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Robdeer,
Oh I know it doesn't mean anything, and the Brewers aren't getting Peavy. I said that a couple times in my post. My post was in response to the guy that posted in here about the Brewers not having any talent to trade for Peavy. it wasn't considering the money side, or the point that I left out that Fuk-A-Dome brought up his no trade clause. I never was suggesting or meant to, if I did that I thought the Brewers were going to even try to trade for Peavy. It was basically an if the only factor was talent argument the Brewers have more then enough to get him based on how extensive the cubs-padres talks were and the package the cubs were supposedly offering.
Posted by: xxgochisox09 | March 23, 2009 at 02:27 PM
I agree he shouldnt be but who will be? Hall everyday? maybe the kid the brewers got from the cubs? he almost has to be in the mix.
Posted by: cubbieblue | March 23, 2009 at 02:28 PM
gochisox.... nice posts. I have seen some of your posts recently and enjoy reading your point of view. You seem like a knowledgeable baseball fan, you have educated opinions, and back them up with evidence.
Like Chisox and Melonis Rex said, the Brewers still have a lot of young talent, and could still rather easily put together a package for Peavy. Whether or not he wants to pitch there is another story, but Hall only said he expected them to pursue him, he never said Peavy would waive his ntc. So calm down there Fuka-don't-me, you sound like a little kid, who happens to be a jealous cubs fan. The Brewers putting together a package for Jake Peavy isn't nearly as ridiculous as you seem to be implying it is. By the way, you handle is stupid. Sorry.
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 23, 2009 at 02:37 PM
I am a Brewer fan and of course I would love to see Peavy in a Crew uniform, but I agree with several on here. The move just doesn't make sense for the Brewers. The Brewers got to the point they are at by building from within their farm system, not by making wreckless trades. Lawrie is young...probably a few years away. In fact he hasn't even played in the Brewers system yet. He was the Crew's first round pick last year, but he's been playing with Team Canada in both the Olympics and WBC. He just switched to 2B, which opens up the catching job for Angel Salome. The Brewers won't trade Escobar, nor should they. This guy is going to be good...and they'll hang on to Gamel, although I don't know if he'll end up at 3B.
Either way, Peavy just doesn't fit in the Brewers plans. They don't need to get rid of ALL of their homegrown, cheap talent, create holes elsewhere, and pick up a mega contract and then lose Peavy to free agency anyway. The prospects that people have been throwing around as possibilities are the future of the team...and its easy to see that they will slot in soon. This is the final year on Kendall's contract...if Weeks doesn't pan out this year I don't think he'll be a brewer too much longer, and Hall likely has a short leash on him this year.
They definitely have the talent to pull of a deal...but the brewer front office isn't dumb enough to do that.
Posted by: JoeyT107 | March 23, 2009 at 04:58 PM
Here's a quote from Walt Jocketty after hearing what Gammons reported about the Harang trade rumor:
"BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..."I'm not going to comment on something when he doesn't know what he's talking about,"
and that's a quote. Sounds like more garbage reporting from the infamous Peter Gammons. Remember, gammons reported earlier this offseason that the Reds were trading Joey Votto. Looks like that stroke has really affected the G man.
Posted by: BigRedOne | March 23, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Gammons really reported the Reds are trading Votto? Lunacy.
Posted by: PWHjort | March 23, 2009 at 05:45 PM
I think Gammons was specualting on Votto, just like he was speculating with Harang.
Posted by: BigRedOne | March 23, 2009 at 05:53 PM
It is no secret Peter Gammons is a Red Sox season ticket holder, so I think he floats these things out there to see if they stick.
Posted by: BigRedOne | March 23, 2009 at 05:57 PM
Gammons objectivity has been called into question before when he was releasing those awful CD's with the Red Sox on them.
It's sad that he had a stroke, but thats no reason to keep him around so that we all feel good about him. He has quickly fallen off as a go to source for baseball info, being replaced by guys like Heyman and Rosenthal.
It just seems that time has passed him by and baseball journalism is an intesne job now and not one for the weak and weary. Pack it up Gammons.
Posted by: Chris | March 23, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Why does Gammons act as if NY was where overaged and overpayed players in decline go to die? What are...the the "Del Boca Vista Phase II" of baseball? I mean sure we went after Damon and etc but at least they were productive players.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | March 23, 2009 at 07:21 PM
"Repko still has minor league options. The more likely Dodgers trade piece would be Delwynn Young."
Young is also a much, much better player. At least at the plate.
Posted by: AA | March 23, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Yeah, Don't believe the Harrang thing for one sec. The Reds actually have a pretty good starting staff. Harrang looked good in 2 of his last 3 starts so I don't wanna hear any trade offers on Harrang cause he is not going anywhere at his price tag. If the team is a flop, like someone above mentioned Arroyo or Cordero will go before Harrang ever does.
Posted by: JayTheRed | March 23, 2009 at 11:29 PM