« Rangers Rumors: Andruw Jones, Joaquin Arias |
Main
| Tigers, Cardinals Discussing Raburn Trade »
By Tim Dierkes [March 31, 2009 at 10:39pm CST]
10:39pm: Frisaro says the Marlins released McPherson, as they were unable to find a trade.
10:36am: Joe Frisaro of MLB.com has the latest on the Marlins.
- Out of options Marlins shortstop Robert Andino remains on the Pirates' radar; the interest dates back to at least the Winter Meetings. Frisaro wonders if the idea of an Andino-Brian Bixler swap could be reignited. However, with Andino being out of options and Bixler raising his profile during Spring Training, that seems unlikely. My own speculation - the San Diego would be a good destination for Andino.
- Frisaro says the Marlins appear to be shopping third baseman Dallas McPherson, who is also out of options. McPherson, 28, hit .275/.379/.618 with 42 home runs in 448 at-bats last year at Triple A. Projection systems remain unimpressed, but I'd like to see what he could do in Minute Maid Park.
- The Marlins are eyeing lefty relief help, with Frisaro naming Pittsburgh's Sean Burnett and free agent Ron Villone as possibilities.
What about the short RF porch at Yankee stadium for 40 games? That'd be a heck of an opportunity for McPherson.
Posted by: SBS0311 | March 31, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Good call on Andino, because if there's one thing the Padres need, it's crappy DFA-level infielders.
Unless he can start and throw 5-6 innings, this is a non-starter.
Posted by: unbiasedhomer | March 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM
"I'd like to see what he could do in Minute Maid Park."
As an Astros fan, I would too.
Posted by: ARusonis | March 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM
McPherson would definitely be interesting in Houston.
I'd surely take a flier on him over giving Geoff Blum or Chris Johnson the everyday job. Blum simply isn't remotely good, and Johnson doesn't appear to be ready for that yet.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM
towles for mcpherson. how's that sound for both sides?
Posted by: boomshwa12 | March 31, 2009 at 12:08 PM
I don't know if the Astros would need to even give up Towles. As bad as he was last year, he still has been a consistently solid hitter in AAA. McPherson on the other hand, should have little to no trade value at all.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM
I would love to see him in a Reds uniform, I'm sick of Edwin.
Posted by: putpeteintheHOF!!! | March 31, 2009 at 03:34 PM
You do realize that Edwin Encarnacion, despite all of his defensive issues, is pretty damn close to being a big time slugger?
He received some awful luck last season (.267 BABIP), and still posted a .807 OPS and 26 home runs.
An OPS in the high .800's and over 30 home runs isn't a crazy prediction for Encarnacion's offensive production this year.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 31, 2009 at 04:27 PM
Andino for Burnett? That would be great. Make it happen, Huntington.
Posted by: piratefan14 | March 31, 2009 at 06:40 PM
The Giants should inquire on McPherson, all winter long they been looking for a power hitting corner infield, looks like McPherson could be had,They can move Sandoval to first base, a easier postion for a second year player, it should take some pressure off him, If they don't try to obtain him, that tells me the Giants don't care where they finish up this year
Posted by: bobbybonds254 | March 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM
I can't believe they just released the guy. McPherson has real value if uninjured.
"They can move Sandoval to first base, a easier postion for a second year player, it should take some pressure off him,"
I wonder if Sandoval has considered throwing left-handed (he is left-handed and throws right so he can play more positions) when playing 1B?
Posted by: AA | March 31, 2009 at 10:42 PM
McPherson just got released
the Giants better at least make an effort to sign him
WE NEED POWER!!
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | March 31, 2009 at 10:43 PM
Scribbletone, although you are one of the best posters here in MLBTR, I must say that your comment regarding Towles and McPherson pretty much disappointed me.
You mention that Towles has been a consistently solid hitter in AAA. Well, I would say that McPherson has been as well, even considering how injury-prone he has been in his career. McPherson is a career .280 hitter in AAA, and was a very solid .300 hitter early on in his career. He missed all of 2007 recuperating from a back surgery in which two vertebrate had to be fused together in his back. He came back last year and hit .275 with 42 home runs. 42 HOME RUNS! Not to mention that his major league OBP has been steadily rising since he made his major league debut in 2004: .279 in 2004, to .295 in 2005, to .298 in 2006, to .400 in 11 games the past season. Granted, his contact rate wasn't good last year (2 hits in 11 ABs), but that's still a small sample size.
How can you say that McPherson should have little to no trade value at all, considering how high his power potential has always been? Had it not been for injuries that derailed him early in his career, he would've been the Angels starting 3B right now.
I mean, it's not like his Andy Marte or anything. (Although Marte has time on his side, as he is 3 years younger than Dallas).
I just thought I'd point out what I feel is an incorrect analysis.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | March 31, 2009 at 10:55 PM
"I don't know if the Astros would need to even give up Towles. As bad as he was last year, he still has been a consistently solid hitter in AAA. McPherson on the other hand, should have little to no trade value at all."
Neither McPherson nor Towles really has that much value left. At this point, both of them are AAAA players until they prove otherwise. McPherson has the added issue of proving his back isn't going to act up again. The one advantage Towles has is that he plays the most valuable fielding position, while McPherson is a highly suspect fielder at 3B.
Posted by: AA | March 31, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Cody Ransom just shed a tear. I don't see how the Yankees do not pick him up.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | March 31, 2009 at 11:17 PM
At this point, I don't think McPherson is a better fit with the Giants than what they already have. I do agree that I would like to see the Giants attempt to sign him, but assign him to AAA Fresno.
Ishikawa has shown this spring he deserves the chance to start at first base and his defense may counted most of what poor performance Sandoval may provide from third. His hitting has been better than advertised and has shown decent power. I would think that .270-.275 BA with 20-22 home runs is not to far fetched.
Sandoval is only continuing what he showed last season and needs to be in the lineup. His defense, while not what I would consider good, has been better than I expected and not bad this spring. Moving him to first would be a downgrade defensively, especially with another potential defensive liability at third, in McPherson.
I would love to see the Giants get him and stash him in Fresno as a backup plan to the Sandoval/Ishikawa tandem, but I think he'll have other options with a better chance for playing time on a major league roster. Don't forget, he has never done anything above AAA. Don't let his homerun total fool you, Scott McClain is in our own back yard as a minor league power hitter with 287 career dingers. McPherson is not Scott McClain, but he is not David Wright either. I think he will find a way to break in this year, but look for it with a team like the Astros or Padres, with less stability at the corners...
Honesty though, I think the Yankee's bring him in to challenge Cody Ransom until Alex Rodriguez gets back. They can afford to buy him. An incentive laden deal built around AB's would get it done. If he excells, they have a great midseason trade option,if he fails, he doesn't get many AB's and they cut him loose.
Posted by: Nuschler's News | March 31, 2009 at 11:31 PM
" If he excells, they have a great midseason trade option"
Even better. He would be under control for a few (2?) more years. So he hypothetically could stay with the team (as a DH maybe?)
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | March 31, 2009 at 11:36 PM
I don't think the Yankees touch him. He's not great defensively and he would force a 40 man roster move. Not to mention once Arod came back, he's useless.
I don't love Ransom, but at least once Arod returns he can play other IF positions decently.
I'd love to see the Yankees take a shot on him, but I don't see it happening.
Posted by: Dicky LaRue | March 31, 2009 at 11:50 PM
Dan Giese can easily be DFAed - he would be for whatever utility guy they go with anyways (Berroa and Ramiro Pena aren't on the roster.) If he's useless once ARod is back he can be easily released or traded, or they can find some other role for him.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | March 31, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Towles just turned 25, and has been an offensive threat from a defensive minded position in the minors. McPherson will turn 29 soon, is a huge injury risk, and plays at a position where offense is considered the norm. Of course Towles has more value.
Posted by: seanbergmanrules | March 31, 2009 at 11:59 PM
The yankees have to sign this guy.
Posted by: maristmetsfan | April 01, 2009 at 12:04 AM
So even though the Astros signed Keppinger, I would still love to see us make a play for Dallas. Keppinger isn't a third baseman and could be given the spot that was gonna go to Jason Smith or Edwin Maysonet and then give Dallas the other spot at third.
Posted by: kct003 | April 01, 2009 at 12:18 AM
Who'd be more valuable to a team with 3rd base help right now: McPherson or Geoff Jenkins?
Jenkins's 2008 line: .246/.301/.392
Posted by: BlueBlooded | April 01, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Tim I usually agree with you in the terms of how you believe players teams fit, but with regards to Robert Andino, SD isn't going to be an option. The Padres really like the things that Everth Cabrera brings (especially speed, which they lack entirely). And given that they have to keep him on the roster all year they don't have room for another SS on the roster this year. The only thing that Cabrera lacks is power compared Andino.
As for McPherson I agree with those saying the Yankees should sign him. Mainly cause he is a butcher in the field, but they have an offense that can withstand it. The giants need power yes, but they need power that can play defense, they team is built on pitching, so it should be defense first.
Posted by: AirmanSD | April 01, 2009 at 12:24 AM
I suppose it's not hugely important to mention this, but I suppose McPherson was released at this time because, like all the other players with between 3 and 6 years service time who was arbitration-eligible, his contract was non-guaranteed.
And as such, any team in a similar position has until April 1 at 2 p.m. EST to release these players and owe them only 45 days' termination pay(the deadline for 30 day's termination pay was March 18).
So, note to Tim and staff--you may be seeing a lot of these transactions for the rest of the day today with all the players who get released(and they won't be April Fools' jokes)! ;)
Posted by: StarryEyed | April 01, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Since Dallas Mcpherson was released last night, the Astros would never consider signing him and having him and Keppinger in the majors would they? Both can play more then 1 position on the infield, and it would give them a nice power bat off the bench, or a good average hitter against lefties. Both were needed badly.
Posted by: tmengd | April 01, 2009 at 07:45 AM
If he thinks it will improve the team, cashman is on it. can never have too many lefty power bats at Yankee Stadium III. actually, you can. but you get my point
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | April 01, 2009 at 09:26 AM
I think McPherson makes the most sense for Houston still, but I'm guessing that they'll at least try the Blum/Keppinger platoon out before giving McPherson a legitimately serious look.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 01, 2009 at 11:10 AM
McPherson would be a great pickup for the Yankees IMO.
Posted by: gianthinker | April 01, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Look at McPherson's stats. He is not the second coming of Ryan Howard. He is more like Rob Deer or Dave Kingman. He's been in the majors for 4 years now and has had 399 ABs. He only has 18 home runs with a .245 average, a .298 OBP, and a so-so .458 slugging percentage. That's not particularly something to get excited about. He has averaged a strikeout per game throughout his minor league career and in the majors. So to only have a .458 slugging with all those negatives is not something I would invite onto my team. If he hit 40 home runs in those 399 ABs I might be interested.
I'm not sure what potential some of you guys see in him but I see B-E-N-C-H written all over him and I also see R-E-L-E-A-S-E by any team that picks him up. Who wants to put up with a washed up 29 year old who never put it together?
Well, I guess if your team has ZERO prospects, he might be better than nothing but there are plenty of bench guys who can outhit him on most teams.
There's your explanation as to why this guy got released!
Posted by: proeye | April 06, 2009 at 06:26 AM