![]() |
|
|
| |
« Yu Darvish Reactions | Main | Mets Claim Fernando Nieve »
A few links for Saturday...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I'd really like to see these GM's passing on Bonds give SPECIFIC reasons why they arent interested in him. All we are going to hear is "we are going to pass" which unless they have no room for him (some teams legitimately dont), then Barry is really going to clean up on a collusion lawsuit.
I'm now going to "call out" specific teams and maybe some posters could give me reasoning why Bonds doesnt have a place on their squads, because I cant see why not:
1. Colorado Rockies: the Rox currently have a bunch of no-name, low ceiling prospects listed, Seth Smith is their LF? Cmon now the Rockies arent even rebuilding, Bonds could absolutely help them win and would outproduce Seth Smith easily. Bonds in LF for 120 games in Denver adds at least 5 wins to that team.
2. Seattle Mariners: Currently could roll with an OF of Griffey-Guitierrez/Chavez-Ichiro OF and Bonds at DH. Bonds would only play a max of 120 G, so Griffey would take the other games at DH. Explain to me why Bonds doesnt fit here? It seems reprehensible that their GM is content on giving 4th OF and AAAA types playing time over Bonds.
3. Florida Marlins: currently have no depth whatsoever and are going extremely young in the OF. Im not saying Bonds deserves time over Hermida-Maybin-Ross, but could surely help the team as a 4thOF/PH type. Considering how Bonds only costs the league minimum, but he's surely an extremely better option than Brett Carroll isnt he?
4. Toronto Blue Jays: similar to the Rox, this team isnt rebuilding but have no power whatsoever and are going with Adam Lind and Travis Snider at LF/DH, there's no real reason at all why there isnt 350 PA's for Barry Bonds here.
Other teams that are giving lesser players PA's that Bonds could almost double the OPS of that player of, but arent because Bud Selig has told every team to not sign him are: The Reds, The Padres, The Twins, The Rangers & The Mets.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | March 14, 2009 at 10:57 AM
I doubt the Padres would sign Bonds, mainly cause of the fact that we only have one roster spot open and we need arms. Headley/Greut/Giles is our starting outfield, so we have no need for Bonds, plus the Bonds isn't liked in SD, considering the amount of home runs he hit against us is more then any other team. Fan reaction would be crazy.
By the way, I saw Strassburg pitch last night, 7 innings, 14k, 1bb, 6 hits, 2er, 1hr allowed. He balked once but other than that he was as dominate as I have seen. I am no scout but I was impressed.
Posted by: AirmanSD | March 14, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Athletic Domination- THANK YOU.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 14, 2009 at 12:41 PM
why dont the pirates have a reunion with bonds? he would be an upgrade in left and pittsburgh cuz use some media attention
Posted by: metsfan23 | March 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Others that REALLY are being dumbf-cks.
1. Los Angeles Angels- I'm obviously not a fan of guys who can absolutely mash going to the home of the rally monkeys. Bonds in LA, sadly, means they're the team to beat. But do you really think there aren't plenty of ABs to have in LA. Juan Rivera will get hurt. GMJ blows. Vlad will get hurt. Hunter's defense is declining.
2. Atlanta Braves- They're contending. Garret Anderson is a decent bat, but he's not really much of a bat. And his defense is mediocre so it isn't like he's some glove wizard. And this is the same team that's going with Francoeur in RF. Hahahahahah LMAO. Faill. Yes, Frenchy has upside, but that's like saying an OF of 3 Scott Podsenicks is going to be productive. Nope. Not happening.
3. Arizona Diamondbacks- Again, this team is NOT rebuilding. That rotation is powerful and that bullpen is decent. However, do you really think Eric Byrnes is going to 1) be good this year, and 2) not get hurt. And that offense blows without Dunn.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM
"All we are going to hear is "we are going to pass" which unless they have no room for him (some teams legitimately dont), then Barry is really going to clean up on a collusion lawsuit."
This might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The teams don't have to give a reason if they don't want to. They don't owe it to anyone. Good luck trying to prove collusion.
Posted by: stellar | March 14, 2009 at 01:10 PM
@ stellar
You must have only started reading 5 minutes ago if thats the dumbest thing you have ever read. Your silly hyperbole aside, the teams arent going to give a reason, because Bud Selig has instructed them not to. This is collusion. Once 1 person comes out and tells the truth about Selig's agenda, the rest will fall like dominoes.
Im sorry but we are talking about a guy who had a 170 OPS+ with 10.2 RC/G in his last season here. Even counting in the drop in numbers due to age, health and whatnot, he's going to outproduce at least 75% of people who are playing LF and DH in MLB in 2009.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | March 14, 2009 at 03:22 PM
No team has to give a reason why they don't want an aging ego-maniac who hasn't played in over a year.
Bonds is a terrible teammate and person and even the classiest manager he ever played for (Jim Leyland) has said negative things about him.
It doesn't matter if he's ever proven to be a steroid abuser, anyone with common sense knows that what he did from 2000 on is tainted.
Melonis -- I thought you were one of the smarter posters on this site. I can't believe you agree with this tripe.
The Atlanta Braves play TEAM baseball. There's no room for a cancer who needs his own personal leather recliner in the clubhouse. I'd rather see the Braves lose 90 games again than compete with Bonds on their team.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 03:39 PM
Oh, and I forgot to mention how Bonds is now a ONE tool player - and that's if he can still even hit the ball.
He was a below average fielder with a below average arm and had no speed when he last played.
He was one of the greatest players ever when he was clean and with the Pirates and Giants in the 1990's. Due to his overblown ego he tainted his reputation and is now one of the most hated men in baseball.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Clint C, you dont think all this mess of things that have happened to him since the end of the 07 season have diminished his ego? At every turn since 2007 he said he just wants to play baseball, get to 3000 hits, make the playoffs one last time, talk to young hitters and use his minimum wage salary to spend on tickets for poor families. He seems genuine, and if he starts doing all the things he was doing in 2001, like you asume he will, uhhh he's making minimum wage the team can just cut him. Its a literal no-lose situation with Bonds.
Bottom line, people like you are holding a grudge and its pointed at the RESULT not the overall reason for the problem. All of the steroid problems in MLB sit squarely on Bud Selig, not any player.
Everyone in America deserves a 2nd chance, its sickening to read what clint c wrote, a narrow minded, ESPN propaganda-swallowing, anti-american view on a guy who just wants to play 1 last year. Anyone who says they would rather their team not win games than to have Bonds is mentally challenged. What about A-Rod? Do you think the same thing?
Show some respect and get your head out of your @ss. Bonds did roids because he was allowed to do so by Selig, if Selig had manned up and instigated a better policy in the mid-90s, everything would be different.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | March 14, 2009 at 04:38 PM
I do fault Bud Selig, to a point. If he had taken a firmer stand with the player's union earlier, the game might not have suffered. That being said, it's not like Selig told Bonds, "Hey, start taking steroids and become some monster of a man". Bonds chose his path and should suffer (these limited) consequences.
I do not believe I am narrow minded and I'm certainly not brainwashed by ESPN. I know I'm not anti-american (if anything, I'm pro American because I want America's pastime to be a clean sport).
I do not like A-Rod, or Maguire, or Sosa, or Clemens or any of the other stars who had plenty of a career and then decided to cheat.
I support the Braves because I like the way they do business and the kind of teams they put on the field. If they got Bonds (or any of the other people I mentioned) I would lose respect for them.
I think your sticking up for a cheater by attacking Selig is out of touch with reality. If murder wasn't illegal, would you start killing people? I would hope not.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 04:51 PM
And, furthermore, I think it's the American way to be able to believe whatever you want. If you believe Bonds deserves this chance, that's fine. I can believe what I want to believe. The owners of baseball teams can believe what they want to believe.
Also, I noticed that you didn't address my points about him being a below average player nowadays. You feel so strongly about him getting another chance, but don't seem to disagree that he's not MLB caliber anymore. Interesting.
If he's truly changed his ways, then let him set up a baseball academy and help children learn how to the play them game. He doesn't need the salary he'd make playing this year, he's got millions of dollars already. If he wants to buy tickets for poor families, he can do that, too. More power to him.
In fact, I suggest he make a sizable donation to Dale Murphy's "I Won't Cheat" program. That would impress me.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 05:17 PM
"If murder wasn't illegal, would you start killing people? I would hope not."
I would start with Mitchell and Selig.
Look, the reality is, they didn't cheat at the time they used them. We live in a capitalistic society and when you do things the right way, you tend to end up on the back end of things. If I was a GM in the 1990's, I would have signed every steroid user in the books. Because we would have won.
"You feel so strongly about him getting another chance, but don't seem to disagree that he's not MLB caliber anymore."
That's because he is MLB caliber and like AthleticDomination said, he could easily out produce 75% of the LF and Dh's in the game. Hall of Famer's don't forget how to hit. Bonds can still get one base and mash the ball. Is he the fastest guy ever? Hell no, but he's still a smart baserunner. You don't have to be fast to be a good baserunner. You forget this guy has 514 SB's. He knows how to run the base paths.
As of now, everything is heresay. I would absolutely LOVE for the Braves to sign Bonds. Not only would he provide a lot more production than Franky, Anderson, and the other Anderson, but then we'd have at one point had all of the home run leaders. Babe Ruth(Boston Braves), Hank Aaron, and Barry Bonds. Awesome.
Posted by: bravesrule14 | March 14, 2009 at 05:33 PM
"Also, I noticed that you didn't address my points about him being a below average player nowadays. You feel so strongly about him getting another chance, but don't seem to disagree that he's not MLB caliber anymore. Interesting."
"Im sorry but we are talking about a guy who had a 170 OPS+ with 10.2 RC/G in his last season here. Even counting in the drop in numbers due to age, health and whatnot, he's going to outproduce at least 75% of people who are playing LF and DH in MLB in 2009."
Apparently you cant read. Interesting.
Posted by: PL | March 14, 2009 at 07:13 PM
No, I can read. So the guy hit EXTREMELY well two years ago and that guarantees that he can still hit now?
He won't get the walks that he used to because the umpires won't give him every borderline call.
The fact is, he hasn't hit major league pitching in a year and a half.
Also, you have to take into account he isn't a complete player anymore. If anyone gives him a shot, it'll be an AL team looking for a DH. He cannot play in the National League anymore.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 07:34 PM
"I'm pro American because I want America's pastime to be a clean sport"
The game has never, ever been clean. Dale Murphy and other really religious guys are total outliers. Nearly every player has taken greenies since they were invented. Greenies are an extremely illegal amphetamine that you can go to prison for if you are caught dealing them on the streets, yet they existed in every clubhouse for generations. People really have to get it out of their heads that this game will ever be "clean". It wont, and frankly, Im glad it doesnt. It makes it more of an "everyman's" game, because in the real world, people lie, cheat and steal all the time. Its awesome to see these guys are no better than anyone.
"That being said, it's not like Selig told Bonds, "Hey, start taking steroids and become some monster of a man". Bonds chose his path and should suffer (these limited) consequences."
From 1990 to 1998, Bonds was considered hands down the best player in the game, boosting his ego and turning him to the arrogant-yet-awesome player he was. Then, in 98, the game/world focussed on 2 others, 2 men who were absolutely using PEDs of various kinds and everyone within the game knew it. The game started to not focus on Barry, he of the large ego. In 1999 Bonds gets hurt and is angry the world isnt focussing on him as much, so he starts using. Seeing as he actually was one of the all time great players, and McGwire and Sosa werent, he puts up video game numbers over the next 7 seasons.
Now, if Selig had put a steroid policy in place by the mid 90s, or, if one had been put in place even earlier in result of the fallout from Ben Johnson's gold medal win in the 88 Olympics like they should have done, the Mac+Sammy HR drive doesnt happen, Bonds remains clean and still the best player in the game, and none of this ever happens.
So yeah, taking into account his ego/personality, and the huge media blitz of "McGwire+Sosa saved baseball" while clearly using PED's, Selig in a way, did force Bonds to juice. He needed to be the center of attention again, and the only way to do that would be to get on Mark+Sammy's level.
Posted by: PL | March 14, 2009 at 07:34 PM
"So the guy hit EXTREMELY well two years ago and that guarantees that he can still hit now?"
Yes. When you are arguably the greatest player of all time, he will still be able to hit home runs at age 50, no problem.
Is Manny a "complete" player like you mention? When you OPS 1200 does your defense even matter? An extra base every other day or an OBP of .450? Big deal he's slow on the basepaths, so are a lot of guys. Why are you obsessing over him being a 5 tool player? No one is arguing that he is slow and his D will suck. The argument is that considering all the players who have jobs right now who play LF and DH, Bonds overall value will be better than 75% of them and the only reason why he doesnt have a team is collusion. I support that argument.
Posted by: PL | March 14, 2009 at 07:40 PM
PL -- You are clearly delusional. I agree, and said earlier, that Bonds was one of the greats. He didn't need to cheat. Even after 1998 no one would have argued that Maguire or Sosa were better players than Bonds -- he was a complete player. He could field, he could throw, he could steal bases, and he could hit.
To claim that he HAD to cheat to satisfy his ego is where you lose me. He didn't HAVE to cheat, he CHOSE to cheat. There's no way around that fact.
And I know the game will never be, and has never been, TRULY CLEAN. Amphetamines have been around since the 1950's and a lot of players take them. I guess I'd prefer it if that wasn't true, but I do know better. I still don't think you should condone the fact that he cheated just because "everybody's doing it". That's not right.
And I thought the argument was the there was some sort of collusion going on on the part of MLB (Selig) and the owners to keep Bonds out of baseball? I don't think Selig has to say anything to the owners, most of them have the common sense to avoid Bonds.
And, no, I don't think Manny is a complete player and I think the Dodgers did a good thing going to a year by year contract with him.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 08:03 PM
"And, no, I don't think Manny is a complete player and I think the Dodgers did a good thing going to a year by year contract with him."
Wrong. The Dodgers gave Manny a PLAYER option for 2010. So if Manny sucks/is a cancer to the team, HE controls the option, not the Dodgers.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 14, 2009 at 08:34 PM
Just a quick question: why are you so obsessed with "complete" players? Can you please make a comprehensive list of all the "complete" players currently taking up roster spots at LF and DH? These players you are talking about are limited to like Grady Sizemore and Grady Sizemore and you act like they are a dime a dozen.
"The argument is that considering all the players who have jobs right now who play LF and DH, Bonds overall value will be better than 75% of them and the only reason why he doesnt have a team is collusion."
Thats the argument, you have done nothing to prove against it otherwise, thanks for playing though.
Posted by: PL | March 14, 2009 at 08:43 PM
You also used "delusional" in an incorrect way, you are hard-headed and close minded, I get it, just insult me like a typical internet clown would. I just put forward a stream of logic that explained why Bonds MIGHT have juiced. Dont bite my head off for no reason, and dont go use a far-reaching term that doesnt apply here.
Posted by: PL | March 14, 2009 at 08:46 PM
"Oh, and I forgot to mention how Bonds is now a ONE tool player - and that's if he can still even hit the ball.
He was a below average fielder with a below average arm and had no speed when he last played."
That second paragraph describes Ryan Howard. And Prince Fielder. And Raul Ibanez. Do you know what all those guys got this offseason. That's right, multi year deals. And all of these guys were WORSE fielders than Bonds was in 2007. And none of them really light up basepaths.
"So the guy hit EXTREMELY well two years ago and that guarantees that he can still hit now?"
And players aren't signed on purely "upside" signings, even if they weren't effective last year? Griffey, Garret Anderson, Juan Rivera (got 3 years, even though he got hurt), Freddy Garcia, Tim Redding, Carl Pavano, etc. All of these guys either didn't play much or blew last year. They all got guaranteed money. None of them were good players anytime recently (although some were good years ago).
The guaranteed money would be VERY low, thus signaling a VERY low risk, and the upside is MASSIVE. Bonds wasn't not productive in '08 because of injuries/suckiness, but because of collusion.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 14, 2009 at 09:01 PM
Steroids are illegal. They were illegal before Bonds took them, and they were illegal regardless of what Selig didn't do. You can't say Bonds didn't know that. There is no justification for being a drug abuser. I don't take greenies or any steroid to wake up every morning to do my monotonous job, and I don't think there is any justification for baseball players to do it either. That doesn't make them more like average joe's like me. It makes them ignorant, self-absorbed, money hungry pricks.
Everyone knows what Bonds & Clemens did. You know the difference between them & people like A-Rod & Giambi? They never admitted to doing it. I can relate to someone who makes a mistake and admits to it easier than someone who screws up and acts like we should just accept their cheating and lies thereafter despite the facts. How'd that work for Pete Rose? Bonds has never shown contrition for something he knew was wrong. Maybe he'll admit in 15 years in a book, but if 4,256 hits couldn't overcome gambling, then I doubt 762 HR's will overcome the illegal activities and general prickness that is Barry Bonds. I'd rather my heroes gamble than become drug abusers.
Posted by: pinetarhand | March 14, 2009 at 09:31 PM
Delusional - a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary.
I believe that just about sums up your belief, PL, that Bonds ABSOLUTELY HAD TO CHEAT. Every single person in this world makes their own decisions based on what they feel/believe is right. Bonds chose to cheat.
I don't think I insulted you like a typical internet clown would have. I didn't resort to any childish name calling. If you truly felt insulted, I apologize.
Melonis -- One difference between all the players you mentioned getting multi year deals and Bonds is that they don't come with all the baggage that Bonds comes with. The typical baseball fan believes he cheated to overtake one of the game's most sacred records, and they don't want to watch him play anymore.
Any owner that signed him would hear about it from thousands of disappointed fans.
He does have quite a bit of upside as a DH in the American League, I'll give you that, but to think he'll come back and put up the same kind of numbers as he did in 2007 is kind of silly, at least in my opinion.
It's not "collusion" when the owners make up their minds individually. It's called common sense.
Posted by: Clint C | March 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM