![]() |
|
|
| |
« Royce Ring Placed On Waivers | Main | Offseason In Review: St. Louis Cardinals »
THURSDAY, 8:46am: Jeff Wilson of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram has a bit more. He says the Rangers are aiming to buy out at least one year of free agency, and will probably use the contracts given to Ian Kinsler and Hank Blalock as guidelines.
WEDNESDAY, 4:36pm: According to T.R. Sullivan of MLB.com, the Rangers presented a contract offer to Josh Hamilton and his agent. Hamilton was "disappointed" with the proposal.
Sullivan notes that Hamilton is already under team control through 2012, and is believed to be seeking "a deal in the 4-6 year range with possible options." Hamilton will be arbitration-eligible for the first time after this season.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Texas will find a way to lock him up.
Posted by: Calriver | March 25, 2009 at 04:52 PM
I know it will never happen, but man would i love to see hamilton in pinstripes. I think you could say that he's shown that his swing would be perfect in yankee stadium.
Posted by: jpg1200 | March 25, 2009 at 05:18 PM
not good
Posted by: JH32 | March 25, 2009 at 05:35 PM
"I know it will never happen, but man would i love to see hamilton in pinstripes."
Boy, I wish the Indians could sign the top three free agents and then still wish to sign a guy like Hamilton.
I mean, seriously, you have Swisher on your bench, yet it's never good enough for you is it? Quit hording players.
SALARY CAP!
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | March 25, 2009 at 05:52 PM
"Boy, I wish the Indians could sign the top three free agents and then still wish to sign a guy like Hamilton.
I mean, seriously, you have Swisher on your bench, yet it's never good enough for you is it? Quit hording players.
SALARY CAP!"
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | March 25, 2009 at 05:52 PM
Lol
Posted by: Alex Trebek | March 25, 2009 at 06:27 PM
i am sick of yankee fans wanting everyone elses players. lets sign the 3 top free agents then complain that you need more.
Posted by: baseballfan0001 | March 25, 2009 at 06:28 PM
Any long term contract should have a "relapse" condition for the Rangers.
Hey, I'm a fan of Hamilton and his story but baseball is a business. Gotta cover your butt.
Posted by: B Dubz | March 25, 2009 at 07:25 PM
They most likely offere Pedroia money but he was expecting Markakis money.
Posted by: XD23 | March 25, 2009 at 08:13 PM
"I know it will never happen, but man would i love to see hamilton in pinstripes."
The spoiled little rich boys - daddy's bought them all he could this winter and they still want more.
Posted by: Iron Nat | March 25, 2009 at 08:19 PM
So just because we signed the top free agents this year means that Yankee fans can't dream of having other good players on their team?
I guess going by those standards, the only teams that can consistantly not wish that other teams' good players were on their team would be Pirates and Marlins fans as they are the only teams that don't seem to make any big splashes ever via free agency.
Posted by: defense | March 25, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Everyone bashing jpg1200 for wishing Hamilton was on the Yankees needs to calm the f**k down, he said he knows it'll never happen and he never complained about not having a good enough team or about Swisher not being enough off the bench, but god forbid a yankee fan makes a comment about wanting a player, it's not like you guys don't wish your team could sign him.
Posted by: Yanksallday | March 25, 2009 at 08:36 PM
"god forbid a yankee fan makes a comment about wanting a player,"
This is a new America buddy - and change will come to baseball. The people want change and change will come. There will be hope for the have nots and the rich, greedy teams will see that the wealth will be spread around. People hope for change and change will bring them hope. I think that's what New Yorkers voted for?
Posted by: Iron Nat | March 25, 2009 at 08:51 PM
Iron Nat. if your expecting a Salary Cap. i dont think that will happen buddy. Not in baseball thats for sure. Correct me if im wrong but wouldnt like half or majority need to vote YES on that. So like Teams like:NYY,BOS,NYM,DET. <== those teams were the only ones i could really think had a big payroll. But you guys get my point.
And i think "Lower Case zack is better" or whatever he calls him self was just trying to say that it just gets old that NYY say that. But i just found it ammusing because i think it does get old but i jsut let the Yankee fans say whatever they want and just dont say anythin because isnt worth it anymore lol
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 25, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Iron Nat. if your expecting a Salary Cap. i dont think that will happen buddy. Not in baseball thats for sure. Correct me if im wrong but wouldnt like half or majority need to vote YES on that. So like Teams like:NYY,BOS,NYM,DET. <== those teams were the only ones i could really think had a big payroll. But you guys get my point.
And i think "Lower Case zack is better" or whatever he calls him self was just trying to say that it just gets old that NYY say that. But i just found it ammusing because i think it does get old but i jsut let the Yankee fans say whatever they want and just dont say anythin because isnt worth it anymore lol
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 25, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Salary cap part i ment GM's and Owners
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 25, 2009 at 09:11 PM
Salary cap part i ment GM's and Owners
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 25, 2009 at 09:11 PM
Iron Nat,
what are you blabbering on about change for? I was defending a comment made by jpg1200 because it pisses me off how much everyone likes to bash yankee fans. Case in point is this thread, all the guy did was say he wished Hamiltion could one day be in pinstripes, is that really a crime? Wanting a dominante power hitting OF? Last I checked all teams want that and would love to have Hamilton in their OF, the thing that really makes me mad is if it had been a fan of almost any other team, no one would have thought twice about it. And it is ignorant of you to assume that I live in New York just because I'm a Yankee fan.
O and just so I comment somewhat on the article written I think it would be great to see Hamilton be a Ranger long term, it is a great story, to come back from where he was (even though it was self-inflicted) and still be able to play baseball at the highest level speaks volumes about him.
Posted by: Yanksallday | March 25, 2009 at 09:32 PM
1) yes the yankees did spend a lot of money this year(even though they actually did lower payroll), but the outfield is still bad. Plus damon, nady, and matsui are all gone at the end of the year.
2) who wouldnt want to have a 27 year old, power hitting outfielder and, former number 1 overall pick on their team.
3) I did say I know that it won't happen.
Posted by: jpg1200 | March 25, 2009 at 09:33 PM
I'm a Yankee fan. I wouldn't mind having him play for my team. Where is the sin in that? Why is it always a problem if the Yankees do it. Those of you who can't stop groaning, moaning and complaining about the Yankees have got to get over it. The Yankees are good not bad for baseball... the fact that we spend most of the time either talking about or hating on them says so...
Posted by: cary | March 25, 2009 at 09:45 PM
The Yankees are good for baseball and AIG is good for America - get over it.
Posted by: Iron Nat | March 25, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Every team can only have 1 elite player and the rest have to be mediocre. Fans cannot wish for their teams to acquire elite players to win a WS or two, ever! Period.
Wonder what is the opinion of those who bashed jpg1220 for his comment about Fantasy Baseball...
Posted by: Wek | March 25, 2009 at 11:15 PM
I don't know if you guys understand (or care) but salary caps take money away from the PLAYERS not the owners. A salary cap would drive down the prices of players. For instance, if there wasn't a salary cap in football, players like Manning and Brady could be making $20, $30, $40 million or who knows how much.
Posted by: Umair | March 26, 2009 at 01:27 AM
I think it's telling how many posters are Yankee fans and admit it. The fact is, you don't have a Cincinatti Reds fan on here saying they wish he was a Red and you don't have a Padres fan wishing he played in San Diego and you don't have a Braves fan wishing he was a Brave- you have yankee fans wishing he was a Yankee, due in large part to the question mark that is our outfield.
Matsui is a DH at best and hasn't been healthy for 2 seasons going on 3, Nady is a massive question mark as to how is production will be this year, if we'll use him as a trade chip, etc. and Damon was 52 million down the drain unless we come up with something this year and unless he does some obvious heroics, it won't be thanks to him.
Bottom line: We need to fix our outfield. It hasn't been solid in many years, not since we started signing guys like Sheffield. We need young and multi-tooled players, not the injured and aging mashers we have right now.
Posted by: BomberMan26 | March 26, 2009 at 05:45 AM
You know, I thought I have seen that name before, hmmm Iron Nat. You were from MLB.com, right? Ohh wait you come here to do more Yankee hating. He never even told anybody who is favorite team was. The sad thing is, if I remember, his favorite team used to be the Yankees. How ironic. Oh wait that should be your name. Ironic Nat. Brilliant!
Posted by: Yankee for l1fe | March 26, 2009 at 06:33 AM
If the Yankees had really wanted Hamilton, then they'd have traded for him before the Rangers did. The Yankees are like little kids who only want something that belongs to somebody else and is better than what they have. That is really why the Red Sox are better than the Yankees because the Red Sox make moves that are planned, while the Yankees just walk in and whip out their checkbook. How's that working out for the Yankees these days? The Yankees still wouldn't know who Josh Hamilton even was if he didn't bash all those homers at the All-Star game. Keep lusting for what you can't have there, Yankee fans.
Posted by: MadmanTX | March 26, 2009 at 07:29 AM
Look, I'm a small market team that hates the fact that baseball has completely unfair practices when it comes to the signing of free agents. Yes a salary cap takes money out of the pockets of players, but let's be honest, how many of these professional atheletes really need the extra $10 mil? It would, in my opinion, level the playing field and allow smaller market teams to hold on to their franchise players. I still wish the Twins could have kept Torii Hunter.
Posted by: KPuckett34 | March 26, 2009 at 07:52 AM
MadmanTX, yes the yankees would have known who he was, orginizations don't forget number 1 overall picks. And I knew who he was before last year too, I drafted him in my fantasy draft last year and reaped the rewards.
BomberMan26, you are absolutely right, the yanks outfield is prob the worst defensive outfield in the majors, and their bats really dont make up for it. Damon has the arm of a second baseman right now, and our second baseman's arm is actually ten times better. Also, Nady doesn't have the arm for right, but at least he's not afraid of the wall like the former right fielder.
Posted by: jpg1200 | March 26, 2009 at 08:22 AM
"The spoiled little rich boys - daddy's bought them all he could this winter and they still want more."
Wow calm down, drink a cup of decaf. So a Yankee fan said he would like to see Hamilton on his team, big deal. Who wouldn't want to see a great player like Hamilton on their team. Same as everyone wanting to see a player like Pujols on their team.
The poster wasn't demanding the Yankees acquire Hamilton. Yankee fans know they are lucky to see such great players year in and year out. Doesn't mean they (well not all of them) feel they are entitled to everyone either.
Posted by: jvg019 | March 26, 2009 at 08:58 AM
"but let's be honest, how many of these professional atheletes really need the extra $10 mil?"
How many of those billionaire owners really need that extra $10 mil?
Posted by: jvg019 | March 26, 2009 at 09:07 AM
I'm a Yankee fan. I wish we had Tim Lincecum and Roy Halladay and we should have had Johan Santana and then get Josh Hamilton and....Shut up already. You Yankee fans are so bad it is funny anymore. Why don't you spend your time criticizing your GM for not developing Phil Hughes and Joba Chamberlain properly? Most of you Yankee fans have gotten so used to picking up free agents that you forgot what it's like to develop a star like Jeter or Rivera from within. Pathetic, but expected.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | March 26, 2009 at 09:41 AM
I just wish the Cubs held on to Hamilton when they selected him in the Rule 5 draft and traded him to the Reds. Talk about a solution to the left handed power hitter problem we had. Now we've got Mr. Fragile to play RF instead. Fantastic!
Posted by: Dan | March 26, 2009 at 10:04 AM
Seriously, stop with all this hypocrisy.
Grover'sRoyals, you are telling me you do not want to have Lincecum, Halladay, Satana, etc., in your team? Just shut up, you are the pathetic one here. Based on your name, I'll assume you are a Royals' fan, am I right? If so, how have the Royals been doing trying to develop their players? How many times have they been to the playoffs?
A team can only help develop players so much. Not everyone has the potential to develop into elite players. When have the Yankees gotten an elite top prospect to develop? Never, they go with FA for that reason.
Posted by: Wek | March 26, 2009 at 10:55 AM
I will give you the fact that absolutely no major league owners are in dire need of the $10 million. But here's my case, the Twins have had a steady team for the past 7 or so seasons, always on the threshold of making the playoffs if they don't. They DO develop their players. Torii Hunter, David Ortiz, and Johan Santana (via trade)have been a few examples of what they have developed and lost due to the wide open market of free agency. If a salary cap were imposed it would keep teams like the Yanks, Mets, BoSox, Angels, Dodgers from investing these ridiculous amounts of money to players from smaller market teams. The business of baseball has taken away from the passion and loyalty (ON BOTH SIDES). Kirby Puckett is by far my favorite player of all time because through thick and thin, he stayed with the Twins, even through all the bad years, because they drafted him and made him the face of the franchise. The only player I can remember doing that in New York is Jeter. It's just not the same game anymore. I wish that rosters wouldn't change so drastically from season to season.
Posted by: KPuckett34 | March 26, 2009 at 11:16 AM
KPuckett, actually the Twins didn't develop David Ortiz. They tried to train him as an opposite field hitter. Boston told him to swing away. And as I recall the Twins released him to FA. So one could say the reason the Twins haven't had a WS winner since 91 is a failure in phillosophy, not money.
One thing people forget. Baseball is a business.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 26, 2009 at 11:30 AM
""but let's be honest, how many of these professional atheletes really need the extra $10 mil?"
Even if you've made $50 million, $10 million is a TON of money. Do you realize how many professional athletes go broke? Many of these guys have no idea about how to invest and save their money. Not saying Hamilton is like that, but $10 million in this economy is a massive sum of cash.
And can people please stop with the big market team/little market team crap.
Even with the unlimited assets, the Yankees aren't the definitive best team in the game, and honestly I think it's nice to watch a team of young guys grow up and develop together. I never get to see that because I live in Chicago, but teams like the Twins are ran far better than the Yankees and manage to contend every year in spite of their payroll. Young, cheap players are the way to maintain long term competitiveness, and honestly I'd expect the Yankees to be saddled with multiple, simply brutal contracts within 3-4 years (think about paying A-Rod $30M when he's 38, while they're also shoveling money to Tex, CC and Burnett as well).
Sadly, the big market teams are figuring out how to run a farm system and develop young players, at which point they may become unstoppable. That's why they need to figure out this draft slot bonus stuff, so that the worst teams ALWAYS land the prospects that they deem are best, not the ones that they deem affordable.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 26, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Forget about the Yankees. They're both good and bad for baseball and as much as I'd love to see them stacked from lead off to whoever is batting 9th in their line up, it's okay for other guys on other teams to get big fat contracts as well. As for Josh Hamilton....
No way the guy is worth only 5 million annually. He and his agent know a guy with his talent would command 10 mil per year just as a base number, if he was a free agent on the open market. Given that, I think they will come to a medium ground eventually. Buy out his arbitration years for extra cheap, but sign him to a loooong a backloaded contract to eat up his free agent years.
If they go cheap...
Prediction: 6 years/$42 million
If Hamilton gets the bigger chunk of the wishbone...
Prediction: 6 years/$75 million
If they meet in the middle...
Prediction: 6 years/$58.5 million
Posted by: BomberMan26 | March 26, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Forget about the Yankees. They're both good and bad for baseball and as much as I'd love to see them stacked from lead off to whoever is batting 9th in their line up, it's okay for other guys on other teams to get big fat contracts as well. As for Josh Hamilton....
No way the guy is worth only 5 million annually. He and his agent know a guy with his talent would command 10 mil per year just as a base number, if he was a free agent on the open market. Given that, I think they will come to a medium ground eventually. Buy out his arbitration years for extra cheap, but sign him to a loooong a backloaded contract to eat up his free agent years.
If they go cheap...
Prediction: 6 years/$42 million
If Hamilton gets the bigger chunk of the wishbone...
Prediction: 6 years/$75 million
If they meet in the middle...
Prediction: 6 years/$58.5 million
Posted by: BomberMan26 | March 26, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Forget about the Yankees. They're both good and bad for baseball and as much as I'd love to see them stacked from lead off to whoever is batting 9th in their line up, it's okay for other guys on other teams to get big fat contracts as well. As for Josh Hamilton....
No way the guy is worth only 5 million annually. He and his agent know a guy with his talent would command 10 mil per year just as a base number, if he was a free agent on the open market. Given that, I think they will come to a medium ground eventually. Buy out his arbitration years for extra cheap, but sign him to a loooong a backloaded contract to eat up his free agent years.
If they go cheap...
Prediction: 6 years/$42 million
If Hamilton gets the bigger chunk of the wishbone...
Prediction: 6 years/$75 million
If they meet in the middle...
Prediction: 6 years/$58.5 million
Posted by: BomberMan26 | March 26, 2009 at 02:15 PM
"I know it will never happen, but man would i love to see hamilton in pinstripes."
I too would love to see him in pinstrips but this guy is a risk. There is always a chance of him suffering a relapse and he's never played in a pressure situation.
He's better off in Texas
Posted by: Since_77 | March 26, 2009 at 04:02 PM
Wek,
I'm not being a hipocrite, I don't sit and daydream about having Hamilton on the Royals because it won't happen. That is my point about you spoiled Yankee fans. Also, developing an elite player doesn't always occur with an elite prospect. Which is exactly why the Yankees don't develop studs internally, they are too used to going out and buying whoever they want. Oh yeah, I'll be sure to worry about a Yankees fan making cracks about the Royals in the playoffs. You guys are the model all franchises should follow. Pay more than anybody and don't worry about anything else. That's worked great for you guys. At least you finally spent some money on pitching. Only took like 4 or 5 major mistakes before that one got figured out. Then you bid against yourself to get the pitching you did this off season. Brilliant.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | March 26, 2009 at 04:57 PM
sorry, i didn't bother reading many comments past 20, but the people who get pissed about yank fans lookin forward to next year are kinda being unfair. everyone dreams about future free agents and how they would fit on their squad. I have little experience in such hope, being a pirates fan, but i regress.
yes, the Yankess got the top three free agents this year, but that doesnt mean fans cant still look forward to the future.
a lot of Yankee fans get overboard (see: Kenny) with their aspirations, but its really unfair to categorize all yanks fans as dumbba$$ fairthy-weather baseball fans.
and for anyone who hates on the Steinbrunners for spending so much money, flat out, you are jealous the owner of your team doesnt want to win as much as he does. id love for a Stein-type to worry less about his ski resorts and more about the product he puts on the field for the Bucs.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | March 27, 2009 at 02:59 AM
Not jealous, just like to call it as I see it, and lots and lots of Yankee fans are conceited and arrogant yet they have a horrible farm system and outbid themselves on free agency. Oh yeah, and let go a manager that took them to the playoffs how many years in a row? That was genius. Having witnessed what the Yankees have become, I can honestly say that a payroll of $300 million leaves no room for failure and opens a door for harsh criticism. Not sure I would want that. I think I would prefer to have young guys we drafted, fill some holes, and go out and compete with a payroll that isn't absolutely disgusting.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | March 27, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Definitely not jealous of a team that spends close to $300 Million and doesn't make the playoffs.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | March 27, 2009 at 11:48 AM