![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rangers, Dodgers Eyeing Yusei Kikuchi | Main | Odds & Ends: Draft, Iwamura, Mets »
Juan C. Rodriguez at the Sun-Sentinel says the Giants have had preliminary discussions with the Marlins about second baseman Dan Uggla, "though they are not believed to have reached general manager level."
This jives with reports that Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria wants "substantive changes" for his team. Rodriguez says the Giants would almost certainly have to part with Matt Cain or Jonathan Sanchez if such a deal were to go through.
Rodriguez also speculates that the Giants might be kicking the tires on Nick Johnson and Mark DeRosa in their quest for a bat.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Mark De Rosa is in perfect condition, Brian. Really. I've got a note from the previous owner. No need to check CarFax. Please. Please. Please. De Rosa and a few nice prospects for cain. Please.
Posted by: MickS | May 24, 2009 at 07:29 PM
Hasn't a Sanchez-Uggla deal been rumored for a year now? Just pull the trigger already.
Posted by: soxfan93 | May 24, 2009 at 07:33 PM
Cain for Derosa---plus prospects--- what a joke
If the marlins want substantive changes why not trade Uggla for 2B manny burris and Sanchez?
Posted by: YaSquare | May 24, 2009 at 07:34 PM
YaSquare writes: "Cain for Derosa---plus prospects--- what a joke"
Yup
Posted by: sfgiantsworld.net | May 24, 2009 at 07:37 PM
It was meant to be a joke.
Posted by: MickS | May 24, 2009 at 07:38 PM
The Best thing, as a Marlins fan, would be Uggla for Cain and Lewis. Move Coghlan back to 2B and put Lewis in 2B. Of course, Cain + Lewis > Uggla...so we would have to give a little more...Burke Badenhop + Brett Carroll anyone? Maybe we can throw in Fredi Gonzalez in for free!
Posted by: FishRock | May 24, 2009 at 07:41 PM
Sorry, I meant put Lewis in LF
Posted by: FishRock | May 24, 2009 at 07:42 PM
FishRock writes: The Best thing, as a Marlins fan, would be Uggla for Cain and Lewis. Move Coghlan back to 2B and put Lewis in 2B. Of course, Cain + Lewis > Uggla...so we would have to give a little more...Burke Badenhop + Brett Carroll anyone? Maybe we can throw in Fredi Gonzalez in for free!
LOL, another joke right? Good one.
Posted by: sfgiantsworld.net | May 24, 2009 at 07:48 PM
@sfgiantsworld.net
How about instead of Cain, Sanchez?
Posted by: FishRock | May 24, 2009 at 07:50 PM
Wait, Cain + for Uggla? As a Giants fan I wouldn't even trade Cain straight up, let alone throw in Lewis for Uggla. Sabean is a moron though, so you never know.
Posted by: joefx21 | May 24, 2009 at 07:52 PM
The Giants will not be able to aqquire Uggla unless they give up Cain which I don't think would be a good trade for the Giants. Despite Uggla having good power, he is not consistent enough. He has had great first halves over the last couple years, but has had bad 2nd halves. He will probably get better as he gets older, but he is starting to get expensive. I don't think that Jonathan Sanchez will be enough to fullfil this deal.
Posted by: It's Giant's Time! | May 24, 2009 at 07:57 PM
Dan Uggla for Johnathan Sanchez seems a lot more reasonable that Uggla for Cain.
If the Giants made this move I would like to see them go for a 1st baseman next. Fred Lewis and Travis Ishikawa for Nick Johnson seems reasonable. This will also allow Nate Schierholtz to finally show off his talent.
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 07:59 PM
The Marlins could possibly get Cain if they through in the Still-Waiting-To-Bloom Jeremy "Maybe I Can Hit The Ball Out of The Infield" Hermida. Since he was a prized prospect, and now he is .271/.383/.387 so someone might take on him
Posted by: FishRock | May 24, 2009 at 08:05 PM
I would rather not get Uggla than give up Cain to do so.
Posted by: joefx21 | May 24, 2009 at 08:06 PM
just do this already. sanchez's trade value is going down every start. sabean act fast. now.
Posted by: BBGiants25 | May 24, 2009 at 08:06 PM
After the Nationals land Lewis and Ishikawa they could try to trade Kearns to a team who needs an outfielder in exchange for some young pitching. How about Kearns to the Braves for Stephen Marek or James Parr?
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 08:06 PM
agree with joe uggla isnt worth giving up cain
Posted by: theguy9 | May 24, 2009 at 08:11 PM
Jonathan Sanchez and Fred Lewis for Dan Uggla and a B- low level pitching prospect. This trade will benefit both teams.
Posted by: Leland11 | May 24, 2009 at 08:11 PM
Uggla will cost. 30+ HR second baseman guys that also knock in 85+ runs are rare. The knock on his poor glove is another fallacy also, sure his range is not the best, but he catches what is hit to him and has good hands, much better than Ramirez who plays SS next to him on the Fish and Uggs turns the DP very well. A VERY good clutch hitter, best on the marlins and I'd hate to see the marlins trade him, but also realize they also probably are not going to want to pay either him, or Cantu what they are worth next year and Uggla has more trade value.
They will get a top starter back for him, whether or not it comes from the Giants is the only question.
Posted by: johns | May 24, 2009 at 08:20 PM
FishRock writes @sfgiantsworld.net How about instead of Cain, Sanchez?"
Sanchez for Uggla? humm I'm not sure I would make that deal, but I could see both teams making that deal.
Odds are the Giants will make a trade with the Nats.
Posted by: sfgiantsworld.net | May 24, 2009 at 08:34 PM
I think the multi team deal I described would be the best. All four teams (Giants, Marlins, Nationals, and Braves) receive something they need and give up something they have an excess of.
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 08:37 PM
@Johns
Right now Uggla is expendable. He is on the verge of a pretty significant payday and their is a player who can easily take his spot (Chris Coghlan). If Uggla got off to a hot start than perhaps the Giants would have to give up more, but because of his slow start his value is slightly diminished. I think the Sanchez for Uggla deal is one of the most balanced trade in recent memory.
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 08:40 PM
Why would the Braves want Kearns. He isn't an upgrade over matt diaz. All he is is another "what-if player" tons of potential and talent he could never live up to
Posted by: bravoboy10 | May 24, 2009 at 08:51 PM
recca is pretty close...Sanchez and Burris for Uggla. Then the Giants turn to the Nats for Nick Johnson and give them Pucuetas and another prospect.
Posted by: mib | May 24, 2009 at 09:01 PM
The Marlins already have their inconsistent, but could be dominant lefty in Andrew Miller. Cain and Fred Lewis for Uggla and Jorge Cantu. Lewis plays LF, Coaghlin at 2B, then call up Sanchez and have him and Helms alternate at 1B. Then next year win the World Series with Cain, Nolasco, Volstad, Sanchez, and Miller.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | May 24, 2009 at 09:04 PM
Actually scratch Sanchez, we got Josh Johnson who is better. Lets trade Sanchez to somebody who wants some pitching......... Now who wants some
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | May 24, 2009 at 09:05 PM
@ Brvaoboy10
In my mind Kearns will be worth about 3 WAR once he leaves Washington. While Diaz does hit pretty well he is limited to facing lefties. Also his defense is extremely poor, hurting his contribution to the team. At best Diaz is worth 2 WAR.
Right now the Braves could use some depth, who knows maybe Kearns comes in and finds his hitting. All the Braves have to give up are two low end pitchers.
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 09:12 PM
@mib
I actually changed the trade around a bit. However the Uggla for Sanchez part remains. During the Nationals/ Giants swap the Nationals will actually get OF Lewis, 1B Travis Ishikawa, and LHP Clayton Tanner for 1B Johnson and 2b Hernandez. This way the Nationals get a defensive replacement for Dunn and a middle tier pitching prospect. They only lose their Belliard's backup. The only reason I included Hernandez is I believe the Giants will use him as a defensive replacement for Uggla, this also allows the Giants to send Burriss to AAA for some much needed seasoning.
Posted by: recca | May 24, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Giants trade Sanchez for Uggla.
Giants trade Valdez or another reliver for Nick Johnson.
That gives two nice bats.
Rowand CF
Renteria SS
Winn RF
Uggla 2B
Johnson 1B
Sandoval 3B
Lewis LF
Molina C
Starts to look like a decent lineup.
Posted by: 55saveslives | May 24, 2009 at 09:29 PM
aubrey huff for jonathan sanchez. orioles swallow some of huffs contract as well. does that sound reasonable giants fans? or am i kidding myself?
Posted by: lftyg33 | May 24, 2009 at 09:53 PM
recca-I don't think the Nats want to take on another outfielder.
Posted by: GD31892 | May 24, 2009 at 09:59 PM
i remember in the offseason i told giants fans that sanchez was over-valued and they should do a cantu for Sanchez deal and they all laughed in my face. Guesss its not so funny now. Even though Cantu cooled off he'd still be one of, if not the best hitter in their lineup. They need to do something if they want to try and catch the Dodgers.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | May 24, 2009 at 10:02 PM
I think the word you were looking for is "jibe" -- "jive" is a dance, or in slang, something deceptive.
Posted by: BlueSky | May 24, 2009 at 11:34 PM
@GD31892
That's why I included the Austin Kearns trade, they aren't gaining a corner outfielder they are just replacing one.
Posted by: recca | May 25, 2009 at 12:03 AM
If the Marlins think that SF should send them Cain for Uggla they will have to send along one of their young arms for the deal to be solid. A young studd ace pitcher with amazing stuff is a lot more valuable than a power hitter with awful defensive abilities.
I would say that Cain to the Marlins for Uggla and one of the Marlins young arms like Tucker, Vandenhurk etc would work.
If were talking straight up deal, then it would be Sanchez for Uggla.
Posted by: xethicx | May 25, 2009 at 12:10 AM
First, trading Cain in any package for anyone on the Marlins not named Hanley Ramirez is a total joke. It should not happen. If the Giants trade Cain, they need to get full value for him, which means a Haren/Bedard-lite type deal. The Marlins can't offer a deal with several major league ready or near-ready prospects.
Second, Sanchez's value isn't that high right now, so why sell low? Hold on to him and watch him improve. If he can't move him to the pen where he may be more effect. Just don't sell low.
Uggla and Cantu would make the Giants offense a bit better, but they're hardly world-beaters. Uggla's defense is horrible and Cantu is an average defensive 1b at best.
If the Marlins want to give those guys away then fine, but the Giants should allow themselves to be ripped off.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | May 25, 2009 at 03:02 AM
Marlins have an entire rotation full of young and under performing/full of talent pitchers already and can't see them trading a proven performer like Uggla, one of the top second baseman in the game for Sanchez for something that they are already loaded in.. It makes no sense, if that is what the Giants are centering their offer on, the Fish are better off moving to the next team and waiting. Nolasco, Johnson, Volstad, Miller, Sanchez are just like Sanchez and they don't need another.
Posted by: johns | May 25, 2009 at 07:14 AM
What about this for a fantasy suggestion.
Dan Uggla
Jorge Cantu
for
Emanuel Burris
Johnathan Sanchez
Ishikawa
Valdez
Posted by: xethicx | May 25, 2009 at 08:35 AM
"First, trading Cain in any package for anyone on the Marlins not named Hanley Ramirez is a total joke."
"Uggla and Cantu would make the Giants offense a bit better, but they're hardly world-beaters. Uggla's defense is horrible and Cantu is an average defensive 1b at best."
WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING? First off, last time I checked the last time the giants were relevant was when Baroid was hitting to break the all time HR record...oh yea the Giant's were like 10-20 games under 500. So lets be honest, the Giant's would kiss the marlins feet if they were to offer uggla and cantu in the same trade.
DO YOU REALIZE how hard it is to find a second baseman who can hit for power. Does 29+ hr's the past 3 seasons mean anything to you? Does 85+ rbi's ring a bell? Uggla is having his worst season since being called up and hes still on pace for 100+ rbi's and 25 hr's. As far as his defense, get last year's all star game out of your head....prob because there was a lack of Giant's in the game, so you had to concentrate on Uggla's errors. But...allstar stats do not matter in real games. Uggla's defense will not be the reason your team defense stinks, he is serviceable as a defense second baseman at the very least.
With that said, now you want to also put in Cantu? Again, what are smoking? Including last year and this year look at how many errors Cantu has at first, then look at the amazing defense plays he has made. Then once you take your foot out of your mouth, take a look at his offensive numbers. 29 hr's and 100+ rbi's.....he hit 127 RBI's and 32 hr's with Tampa. This year he may break all of those numbers b/c hes on pace to hit 130+ rbi's and 35+ hrs.
Again, think before you type.
Posted by: Marlins Dynasty | May 25, 2009 at 09:35 AM
Go ahead and keep Sanchez. Just keep waiting and hoping his trade value will sky rocket up and then you can lose him to FA because his value won't go up. See the thing Giant fans don't get is that the Marlins don't need that inconsistent pitcher or those hitters that suck. The Marlins already have those. Either pay up or shut up.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | May 25, 2009 at 09:41 AM
@MarlinsDynasty
If you take a lake at Uggla's UZR/150 you would notice that over his 3 major league seasons Uggla is a slightly below average fielding second baseman with an UZR/150 of about -2.2. It may have been more beneficial if he got off to a better start in the field defensively this year as right now he is at -25 (small sample alert).
I will admit that Uggla hits for above average power for a second baseman, but what you did was use numbers rather rates to show how good of a power hitter he is. Sure, maybe Uggla hits 25 homers and drives in 100 RBI's but right now his OPS .752, I would hardly consider that a good season.
One more thing, before the 2008 season Uggla wasn't all that amazing. I mean yeah if it's fantasy baseball you love seeing a line of .263/109 /29/89/4, but in baseball sense you have a player with a .346 wOBA, that's worth 11 batting runs. To put that in perspective that's similar to Orlando Hudson's 2007 season where he had a fantasy line of .294/69/10/63/10.
Posted by: recca | May 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Let's just reiterate that Cain most likely isn't going anywhere so let's just get him out of this conversation can we. Sanchez alone isn't going to get it done for Uggla. It'd have to be Sanchez + utility IF + decent rated prospect....or something like that. The point is that both sides could definitely benefit.
Posted by: drphonic7 | May 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM
I'm REALLY surprised that no one has mentioned the Giants trading their closer Brian Wilson. I do not like Wilson & his cocky attitude!!!
Even last year when he had like 40 saves or so, I did not like him!! To me, Wilson is NOT a closer!! A closer DOES NOT have an ERA over 4.00!!! IF the Giants were
smart, they would trade Wilson & make Jeremy Affeldt their closer. Affeldt has been lights out this year, except for 1 bad outing in April.
What about a deal like this, the Giants trade Sanchez, Wilson & Ishikawa to Texas for Chris Davis & Hank Blaylock? I think that this would be a fair deal for BOTH teams!!!
Posted by: Pisano | May 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM
What about something like this. The Giants trade Wilson, Winn & Scherholtz to Washington for Ryan Zimmerman? The Nationals have been using a closer by committee this year & have been BEGGING for someone to come in & do a halfway decent job. I feel that Wilson can do a halfway decent job for them. Also, they would be getting a young OF, in Scherholtz & a good team player in Winn!!!
Posted by: Pisano | May 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM
pisano those are not gonna work... the rangers have no need for winn (already have a surplus of outfielders), ishikawa (smoak will make him useless), wilson (fransisco has been lights out). There is no way that the nats trade their franchise player for that trash either
Posted by: Boomer | May 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM
It is well known that Uggla does NOT have an awful lot of range at 2B recca, what he DOES have is steady hands and is very good at turning the DP, he is far more dependable in the Fish infield that his IF partner Hanley Ramirez, who throws balls away, can't get the ball out of his gloves and just makes bone headed mistakes on a continuing basis at SS, no, Uggla is as steady as they come a 2b, just little range and that is what the stat freaks will always use to attempt to "kill" his defense and label it as poor, when it is not.
His bat is as good as it can get at 2b, just as his hits this season have been at opportune times this season and in many cases, clutch and big ones. Paint him as some have been trying, he WILL draw more than Sanchez type struggling pitchers, as I posted earlier, the Fish already have a staff full of them and a carbon copy (namesake also) in Anabel Sanchez that is coming off of the DL list that cannot get it together.
Posted by: johns | May 25, 2009 at 12:57 PM
@johns
I don't think you understand what UZR is. UZR does not measure only range but double plays and errors as well. So the formula is DPR(double play runs)+ RngR (range runs)+ ErrR (error runs)=UZR. You were correct that his range is below average and he does turn double plays well. You were wrong about his hands as his ErrR has been below average his entire career.I never said he is a horrible defensive second baseman but he is in no where near being a good one. He is what he is below average.
He is not as good as it gets in terms of offense at second base. Kinsler, Utley, Pedroia, and DeRosa all had better offensive seasons than Uggla did last year, which as I mentioned before was by far his best ever.
Please never use the word clutch again, clutch is poor perception. Nobody has ever proven that there are "clutch" players, until someone does I have to reject your statement.
Johnathan and Anibal Sanchez don't have much in common besides there last names. Anibal is injured and a righty, throws his fastball less and includes a curveball in his repertoire. Anibal also has never had a 2 WAR season, J. Sanchez nearly had a 3 WAR last season.
The marlins are receiving a possible top of line the starter for a second baseman whom they could replace in a second (Coghlan). This would give the Marlins some much needed pitching depth now that Nolasco and A. Sanchez are gone. Even if J. Sanchez only matches his season totals from last year it would be a major upgrade over almost all of the Marlins starters except for Josh Johnson.
Posted by: recca | May 25, 2009 at 10:57 PM
drphonic7 "Sanchez alone isn't going to get it done for Uggla. It'd have to be Sanchez + utility IF + decent rated prospect....or something like that."
So you want Sanchez and someolike Frandsen, or Burris plus a decent prospect for Uggla? You are out of your flipping mind! You will be lucky if the marlins don't have to throw something else in. Sanchez would bolster your rotation so much a legit #4... He is young and cheap.
If you want Cain you would have to give up Cantu, Uggla, and a top-tier prospect also, Remember what Florida got for Beckett? I would say that the ransom would be something similar to that for Cain... Maybe not quite as much, but 2 major league ready players and a prospect.
Posted by: riverwild | May 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Cain and Ishikawa
for
Joey Votto
Sanchez and Lewis
for
Dan Uggla
World Series
for
San Francisco
Happiness
for
me
Posted by: NinersGiantsWarriorsSharks | May 26, 2009 at 09:19 PM
cain and ishikawa for votto hell no dunn is more of a power hitter is hitting 280.they can give up hinshaw sanchez and ishikawa for dunn and hes more of a scary name then votto in a line up...
Posted by: giants09champscl | June 01, 2009 at 02:09 AM
I'd love to see them get Uggla, but not for Cain. Sanchez, OK. Off the subject, but has anybody noticed- Throw out Zito's first two starts of the year and his ERA is 2.78
Posted by: koa2341 | June 14, 2009 at 01:38 AM