![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cardinals Shopping Greene | Main | Marlins, Loria Want "Substantive Changes" »
Brian Sabean has gone to market. The Giants G.M. is seeking a bat with Nick Johnson atop his list, according to Andrew Baggarly of the San Jose Mercury News.
In a piece posted last night, Baggarly says Sabean is dangling Matt Cain to get a feel for his value on the open-market. "Because Cain is young, controllable and relatively cheap for two more seasons, it would require productive offensive players with similar service-time attributes to strike a deal," says Baggarly.
Cain will make only $2.65MM this year and $4.25MM next, with a $6.25MM club option for 2011. Coming off a complete game victory yesterday, Cain is 5-1 with a 2.40 ERA despite an increased walk rate and decreased strikeout rate in 2009.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
This doesnt make sense. Theyre a building team and Cain is part of the future.
Bringing in Nick Johnson is a dumb idea because he doesnt fit the rebuilding plan. Why does Sabean just concede the division for this season, have a fire sale and then get everything moving in the right direction.
With a lot of young talent already in SF and developing in the minors now, trading Cain would only make sense if they got a package of good young offensively talented position players.
Theyre deep with young pitching but I dont like the idea of trading Cain.
Posted by: xethicx | May 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Phillies trade John Mayberry Jr, Jason Donald, Lou Marson
Giant trade Matt Cain
As a Phillies fan I pray that's enough and the Giants say yes but I doubt it
Posted by: pb | May 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Great, just what we needed...yet another reason for crazy one sided trade proposals. I can see it now: Murphy and Castillo for Cain or better yet...Fontenot, Hill, and Marshal for him.
I could see something like Ludwick for Cain happening, but it would take an established slugger to get the deal done.
Posted by: mtzxc | May 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Agreed x. I only wish SF would take Derrek Lee straight up for Cain. But that is a pipe dream...
Posted by: Cubman12 | May 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM
I wouldnt do it ! Hey Brian think before you trade one of your best young pitchers for an often injured first baseman..
You need a slugger !
Dont do it Brian !
Posted by: TripleHHH | May 24, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Matt Cain for Aubrey Huff straight up! Maybe the O's could throw in Lou Montanez if Huff isnt enough. I pray MacPhail at least looks into doing a deal for Cain.
Posted by: lftyg33 | May 24, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Wow, I thought they'd offer pitching - maybe Sanchez, but not Cain. He's worth WAY more than just Nick Johnson. And the Phillies would have to offer one of their more productive sluggers to make any trade happen.
Posted by: drphonic7 | May 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Huff for Cain? Ok come on, seriously.
The only way Cain is traded is for a return of 4-5 near major league ready players, 3 of which have to be solid position prospects with good offensive upsides and potential.
The Giants dont need Marson or pitching prospects right now, they need more offense in their future.
Cain COULD potentially be bundled with Molina as well to a team in need of both pitching and a catcher. Or at least I think they could.
Posted by: xethicx | May 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Cain for Longoria...
Posted by: seanyt1 | May 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Find a way to get it done, Indians!
Posted by: Krambo42 | May 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM
What would it take from the Rangers to get Cain?
What if we start the deal with Chris Davis? How much more do we have to add?
Posted by: coolbean04 | May 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Derrek Lee (and cash considerations), Jake Fox, and wellington Castillo.
FOR
Matt Cain.
then micah hoffPOWER is r first baseman.
Posted by: ChiTownCubbies | May 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM
I'm going to throw out some ideas:
Cleveland for a package based around Matt LaPorta. The Indians could really use a young established starter long term.
St. Louis for Ludwick and a pitcher.
Texas for a package based around Chris Davis and/or Nelson Cruz.
Milwaukee for a package based around Corey Hart or Prince Fielder.
Giants for a package based around Edwin Encarnacion.
Thoughts?
" Cain for Longoria..."
Longoria is a far more valuable asset than Cain. Longoria is under contract reasonably long term, is one of the best defensive players in the game, and is a monster bat as well. And he's just entering his prime, so I'm not sure that the Rays would move him for a single player in the game right now.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM
The phillies make the most sense. They are looking for a #2.
Mayberry is a solid looking player. With Howard,Utley and Rollins they could trade any of their 1B,2B,SS prospects with Mayberry for Cain.
The giants could instantly move Bumgarner or Alderson into the rotation and not miss a beat.
Posted by: msclmn1722 | May 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM
all right, i suppose just huff isnt enough. how about huff+luke scott+change? that is two 20+ home run bats that the giants could really use...
Posted by: lftyg33 | May 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM
"Giants for a package based around Edwin Encarnacion."
Spaced out.
Cincinnati for a package based around Edwin Encarnacion.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM
scribbletone, i think seanyt1 was kidding about longoria.
Posted by: lftyg33 | May 24, 2009 at 10:44 AM
"Derrek Lee (and cash considerations), Jake Fox, and wellington Castillo.
FOR
Matt Cain."
You're dreaming.
Lee's playing better of late but his value is near nothing, Jake Fox is a hack defensively and probably doesn't belong in the NL, and Castillo is a mediocre prospect and SF has Posey already.
The Cubs would have to give up Vitters, Hoffpauir, Jay Jackson, and a couple more prospects, probably.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM
The Rangers is a pretty viable option, I could see them moving Davis and Cruz for Cain and then just extend Andruw Jones and wait for Smoak to develop.
Thats about the best idea Ive heard yet.
Posted by: xethicx | May 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Raburn, Gallaraga, Larish to SF Cain to Det???
Posted by: highVoltage | May 24, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Rangers:
Matt Cain, SP
Giants:
Greg Golson, CF
Tommy Hunter, SP
Joaquin Arias, SS
Max Ramirez, C
PTBNL
I assume that would get it done and the Rangers could finally get the Ace they need so badly
Posted by: FreeSide | May 24, 2009 at 10:47 AM
"all right, i suppose just huff isnt enough. how about huff+luke scott+change? that is two 20+ home run bats that the giants could really use..."
I registered with Typepad for the sole purpose to ask what you're smoking. Huff and Scott aren't worth half of Cain's value.
Posted by: username | May 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Actually lftyg33 I wasn't. I know it sounds a little crazy, but if you think about Matt Cains lack of run support nearly his WHOLE career and adjust the #'s you will find it would be like trading a consistent 20 game winner for an up and coming stud!!! And looking at the Rays Sched. they're loosing games scoring 5-7 runs. Lets face it Cain only needs 3-4!!!
Posted by: seanyt1 | May 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Some possibilities:
Orioles: Adam Jones or Brian Roberts and a prospect or two
Nationals: Johnson, Milledge, and a prospect or two
Phillies: Donald, Savery(maybe convert him to first base), Marson, plus
Toronto: Snider and prospects
Mets: Wilmer Flores, Ryan Church, a couple of middle infield prospects (coronda and Malo), plus another prospect or two
Rays: Niemann, Joyce, Zobrist, plus
Brewers: Gamel/Escobar, Hall, and a prospect or two
Indians: LaPorta, and a few prospects
If I'm Brian Sabean, I'm either trying to pry LaPorta or Alcides Escobar. If he can get a decent packege around one of those two, he should pull the trigger.
Posted by: nextdaytonmoore | May 24, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Some possibilities:
Orioles: Adam Jones or Brian Roberts and a prospect or two
Nationals: Johnson, Milledge, and a prospect or two
Phillies: Donald, Savery(maybe convert him to first base), Marson, plus
Toronto: Snider and prospects
Mets: Wilmer Flores, Ryan Church, a couple of middle infield prospects (coronda and Malo), plus another prospect or two
Rays: Niemann, Joyce, Zobrist, plus
Brewers: Gamel/Escobar, Hall, and a prospect or two
Indians: LaPorta, and a few prospects
If I'm Brian Sabean, I'm either trying to pry LaPorta or Alcides Escobar. If he can get a decent packege around one of those two, he should pull the trigger.
Posted by: nextdaytonmoore | May 24, 2009 at 10:53 AM
"Rangers:
Matt Cain, SP
Giants:
Greg Golson, CF
Tommy Hunter, SP
Joaquin Arias, SS
Max Ramirez, C
PTBNL"
Actually, I seriously doubt that this would get it done.
The Giants want an impact hitter that can contribute now, not a bunch of decent prospects with limited upside that clearly don't match the value of Cain.
A Rangers deal starts with Davis and/or Cruz.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Throw in Hank Blalock too.
Cain should not be traded.
Im sure Sanchez, & the whole giants outfield minus Winn for a slugger would be fine
I hope Sabean doesnt rush and do anything stupid like hes done before. Remember who he traded to get AJ from the Twins..someone named Joe Nathan and a few others ..
Cain for Nick Johnson sounds so lop sided for the Nats its really not funny.
Cain for Zimmerman and Johnson .. heck throw in Lewis as well..
what a bargain :P
Posted by: TripleHHH | May 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM
"Raburn, Gallaraga, Larish to SF Cain to Det???"
No way that's enough.
Galarraga was awfully lucky last season, as his FIP was 4.88, more than a run over his 3.73 ERA. He had a crazy low .247 BABIP allowed, which made a monster difference. And this season, it's showing. He doesn't miss a lot of bats, walks guys, and gives up a bunch of home runs. He's a decent fifth starter, probably.
And Larish and Raburn just aren't too good.
Not even close.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Golson would fit in perfectly in the outfield. A top notch prospect, who was considered as one of the best at one time in the Phillies system.
Hunter can start but many project him as an excellent bullpen arm. Some say he even may be the closer for the Rangers in the future
Arias is very versatile can play 2b, 3b, and SS. Been hearing his name a lot and i think all he needs is a solid chance in the bigs
Ramirez is a solid talent many teams are after him, he can split time with Posey next season at Catcher and possibly with Ishikawa at 1B vs lefties.
Plus the player to be named later could be any one or a player recently drafted that the Giants like.
** Not saying that is going to be the EXACT or FINAL deal but for a pitcher like Cain i expect thats what it should take.
Posted by: FreeSide | May 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM
As a Giants fan i'm getting really tired of hearing " let's not tradeany of our pitching". That's how we got to this point in the first place!! We have no Evan Longoria in our farm system. We have Posey which will replace Bengie. After that, what are our fans waiting for? Connor Gillespie? No. Angel Villalona? Hes still like 7 years old is making out to be a another sandoval. That's fine but you can't have a team of free swingers. We need more diversity in our lineup. We have a ton of pitching prospects on the way. If history shows us anything were great at making picthers. Terrible at making hitters. Not since Will Clark have we bred a legitimate star.
This is why it's a trade! Both teams need something. We developed a pitcher, let them develop a hitter for us! Im not saying to trade for Nick Johnson but a matt Laporta or Matt Gamel? I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 11:15 AM
"** Not saying that is going to be the EXACT or FINAL deal but for a pitcher like Cain i expect thats what it should take."
Why would the Giants make that deal?
Cain is a solid young #2 starter that's durable and under control for two more seasons.
That has monster value, and you're really not offering a single elite prospect or impact MLB-ready hitter, which is what the Giants would be looking for.
They're not looking to land a bunch of mediocre to decent prospects that aren't even good enough to get a spot in Texas.
A deal would start with a big hitter (Davis, Smoak, Cruz) and you can add pieces from there.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Giants would be idiots to entertain trading Cain. The #1 things the Giants have had for the last few years has been a strong pitching staff anchored by Lince and Cain at the front. Their #3, 4 and 5 guys were decent/borderline pitchers who made good mid/back of the end guys. Clearly Zito is the biggest mistake they've made. He's payed like a #1 but pitches like a 4/5. You take Cain out of the rotation then you expose Unit, Sanchez and Zito for what they are....old, underachieving and a natural disaster. W/o Cain there staff is not only too weak to contend this year but would be further exposed once Unit retires this year. Anderson and Bumgarner are probably at least a year away, so how do they replace their #2 and #3 starters?
It's much easier for them to use some of their young prospects or possibly even Sanchez to acquire a good bat or two. Why not package Winn or Rowand along with either Anderson or Bumgarner for a good hr/rbi guy under contract for another year or so?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Snider + prospects for Cain
NO.
JP wouldnt trade Snider for Bay, he's not trading him for Cain. I dont think SF would do it either since Snider isnt mobile enough to play the outfield in that park and he's too short for 1B.
Posted by: xethicx | May 24, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Scribble:
Would Justin Smoak be eligible to be added as the PTBNL like i said
Posted by: FreeSide | May 24, 2009 at 11:24 AM
I could see the Cardinals trying to get involved in this one...
Posted by: Cardinals Fan Forever | May 24, 2009 at 11:35 AM
One other thing to consider is Giant’s might have found their solution for Third base. If Sandoval keeps doing what he has been doing with a glove the hemorrhaging at third will be over. It doesn’t mean the team has an elite third baseman but the days of Giants’ fans looking at the likes of Encarnacion with envy are, for now, over.
Giantsfan24: Once those young arms get to the Show then you talk about trading surplus. Less than 30 IP in AA is a bit too soon to count on the next wave making to the MLB, let alone staying in the MLB, let alone not being the next Kelly Downs or Jerome Williams. Jeez are you willing to say Crawford is a lock at SS already as well?
Posted by: daveinexile | May 24, 2009 at 11:40 AM
"Snider + prospects for Cain
NO.
JP wouldnt trade Snider for Bay, he's not trading him for Cain. I dont think SF would do it either since Snider isnt mobile enough to play the outfield in that park and he's too short for 1B."
Good points. Plus there's the fact that JPR wouldn't trade Rios for Lincecum so we know how good he is at overvaluing his own players.
Posted by: nextdaytonmoore | May 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM
I think it's a dumb move to trade Cain for a bat. It's too hard to find front rotations starters and way too easy to find power bats.
However, if SF is that stupid then I think the player they trade for would have to be someone who's had mlb success rather than just elite hitting PROSPECTS such as LaPorta and Snider. No way you give up proven, cheap and under control quality pitching for an unproven bat.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 11:47 AM
hahaha these trade scenarios are hilarious, i'm not sure which are my favourites, it's close between the big pile of mediocrity the rangers fan is offering which tippy toes around their top prospects or the cubbies offer with lee's negative value.
AMAZING.
Posted by: The_Bunk | May 24, 2009 at 11:47 AM
@ YanksFan: I am not sure Rowand has much, if any trade value at this point (he is due $12MM a year through 2012). But I agree that is the method the Giants’ should be looking at.
Posted by: daveinexile | May 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM
If you dangle Matt Cain out there....you better start with Prince Fielder, Chris Davis, Evan Longoria, Adrian Gonzalez, Joey Votto or someone like Ryan Howard. All these Phillies fans who are suggesting Lou Marsen, John Mayberry and Jason Donald ....not enough!!!! We don't need a C prospect..we have the best one in the minors with Posey...we don't need an INF in his late 20's in Donald...we already have that with MacPherson....and Mayberry hasn't proven anything yet. I wouldn't mind Fielder and say Hardy for Cain and Ishikawa or Lewis....How bout Holliday/Ziegler for Cain/Lewis straight up....as long as you sign Holliday too an extension...if not, I don't want any part of it. You have too get a bat and build around it. If not, wait till the off season and see what we can get for Cain. Do not trade him for something like Alex Rios or Carl Crawford....not worth it.....The posts that wants us too trade for Aubrey Huff is just ridiculous....We could get Huff from the O's for someone like Ishikawa straight up....He's leaving at the end of the season....the O's would do that trade in a heartbeat. I'm okay with that....If the O's want Cain..they have too start with either Adam Jones or Nick Markakis too start out with.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 11:52 AM
The White Sox could definitely put together a viable package and be willing to use top prospects(other than Beckham).
Posted by: gogopalehose | May 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM
White Sox Get it done Kenny.
Posted by: kcatlantis | May 24, 2009 at 11:56 AM
How bout Cabrera and Inge from the Tigers for Cain/Molina....Would anyone do that trade????
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Heres an easy solution:
Brewers get Matt Cain and a prospect of 2
Giants get Prince Fielder and Manny Parra
This way, Brewers can give Mat Gamel the 1st base job, which would be his anyway in 2011 at the latest.
Posted by: The Year? | May 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Daveinexile: Totally agree that these arms are too young to bring up right now. Sabean has a history of being about a season late on trades and always be behind on the eight ball. I want us to get ahead for once. And right now, i have no faith in any of our fielding prospects. That's just from watching 15 years of giants baseball. Probably a little biased but....
We've played it safe for ever. I'm willing to take the risk. Sandoval has worked out but what do you think his ceiling is? I'd say a higher than average third baseman and possibly 1 all-star year. Until he shows the ability to lay off the high fastball and work a count he will never be great. He's batting .224 with runners in scoring position and .200 with 2 outs. I know he's young but high-fastball hitters have a tendency not break out.
If your a Giants fan what position player are you really excited about not named posey?
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Enough already. There's only 1 deal worth making at this time.
CAIN for FIELDER and WEEKS (the latter offsets the money owed to Fielder).
Pucetas holds done the 5th spot until Bumgarner or Alderson are ready in August.
Gamel or Hall moves to 1st.
Posted by: emelbe | May 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Rangers: Matt Cain
Giants: Justin Smoak, Nelson Cruz, Max Ramirez, Joakim Arias, Tommy Hunter
Posted by: FreeSide | May 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM
"Rangers: Matt Cain
Giants: Justin Smoak, Nelson Cruz, Max Ramirez, Joakim Arias, Tommy Hunter"
Okay, yeah, I would be surprised if they turned down that deal.
Honestly, that might even be a little much including Smoak, Cruz and Ramirez.
If the Rangers were willing to include either Davis or Smoak, along with Cruz and an additional prospect, then I think that the Giants would be hardpressed to not make the deal.
"CAIN for FIELDER and WEEKS (the latter offsets the money owed to Fielder)."
Weeks is out for the year. So actually it's one of the only deals that's actually impossible at this time..
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM
"Rangers: Matt Cain
Giants: Justin Smoak, Nelson Cruz, Max Ramirez, Joakim Arias, Tommy Hunter"
Okay, yeah, I would be surprised if they turned down that deal.
Honestly, that might even be a little much including Smoak, Cruz and Ramirez.
If the Rangers were willing to include either Davis or Smoak, along with Cruz and an additional prospect, then I think that the Giants would be hardpressed to not make the deal.
"CAIN for FIELDER and WEEKS (the latter offsets the money owed to Fielder)."
Weeks is out for the year. So actually it's one of the only deals that's actually impossible at this time..
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM
I may be incorrect but werent the Giants and Blue Jays talking about a Matt Cain for Alexis Rios swap last offseason? If so how about that being revisited?
Posted by: Jdececchi | May 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM
....If the O's want Cain..they have too start with either Adam Jones or Nick Markakis too start out with.
----------
To start with? I would suggest that would be the end of the conversation as well. You can debate whether Adam Jones or Markakis STRAIGHT UP for Cain would work, but not either of those PLUS others coming back to SF.
-------------
How bout Cabrera and Inge from the Tigers for Cain/Molina....Would anyone do that trade????
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM
---------------
I wouldn't...Cabrera is easily the best hitter for Detroit and the center piece for their future. Plus he's had 5 all-star caliber years and yet he's only 26 yrs old. He should be an MVP candidate every single year.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM
It wasn't Cain for Rios.....it was Lincecum for Rios.....and its Alex Rios, not Alexis Rios......
It wouldn't be enough anyway....they would have too throw in another player....
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 12:20 PM
The trade with the Tigers sounds good
Cain & Lewis & Shuerholz for Cabrera and Dontrelle
(that way the Giants get a pitcher)
I really dont like the idea of trading Cain who has great stuff, just lack of run support.
Id figure a way to keep the starters intact, but only Sanchez would be expendable if I had to move someone.
Sanchez Lewis & 2 pitching prospects for Cabrera ?
If I know Sabean he will trade Cain and 3 pitching prospects for a 9th place hitter...
Posted by: TripleHHH | May 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM
YanksFanSince78....just too let you know, the Tigers are shopping Cabrera as well as Ordonez.....they would love too get out of that contract...so no, they are not building around him.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Has anybody realized the fact that this isn't fantasy baseball? These are real GM's. I don't like trading Cain because he has good stuff, but you have to trade something to get something. We could trade Jesse Foppert but i'm pretty sure we won't get prince fielder for him. It takes talent to get talent.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Rangers: Matt Cain
Giants: Justin Smoak, Nelson Cruz, Max Ramirez, Joakim Arias, Tommy Hunter
Posted by: FreeSide | May 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM
---------------
Wow...that's it? No Josh Hamilton? No 1st born child while you're at it?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM
"I wouldn't...Cabrera is easily the best hitter for Detroit and the center piece for their future. Plus he's had 5 all-star caliber years and yet he's only 26 yrs old. He should be an MVP candidate every single year."
I'm not so sure that I trade Cain for Cabrera.
I know that he's a monster hitter, but the guy is also signed to a monster contract and he has practically zero value defensively or on the bases.
I just think that there's a decent chance that he'll be pretty overpaid in a few years.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Scribble, you're wrong.
Cain for Fielder and Weeks can be made with Selig's blessings.
"Injured players may not be traded without permission of the Commissioner nor may they be optioned to the minors, though they may be assigned to a minor league club for rehabilitation for a limited amount of time (30 days for pitchers, 20 for non-pitchers)."
Posted by: emelbe | May 24, 2009 at 12:27 PM
So giantsfan24, you didn't like my trade options...I actually thought it worked for both teams with the trade too the Tigers.....you tell me.....and whats wrong with my Cain for Fielder?? or Ishikawa for Huff??? I don't think these are ridiculous offers
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM
emelbe: I don't think he meant immposible in that it can't be done as much as he meant "why"? Why would anone want to pay Weeks salary for him to sit out the entire season? It's not like the guy was an all-star player year in and year out.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 12:30 PM
No, i would take on Fielder. He's young he's proven. His defense isn't terrible.....I don't think i would have a problem with that. I also don't like the "his contract is too high" thing. there's no salary cap and this isn't my money! I just want to win.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM
GiantsFan 24: Right now in the upper half of the farm? I like Bowker. People forget he went from AA to the Big Club and then had to play out of position at the same time yet still had 10 hr’s a good line drive rate. This year in AAA his BB rate has improved. I like Guzman as well but I think it might be too soon to expect him to stick on the club.
-
If one doesn’t enjoy Sandoval I am not sure they should be allowed to be a Giants’ fan, he is just that fun to watch. He will always be a hacker thought, think of him as the anti J.T. Snow, but it does not mean he can’t get better.If you want to talk stats on Panda than keep 3 things in mind:
1. He is only age 22.
2. Small Sample Size. We are talking at 55 P.A.’s 20 of which happen with 2 already out.
3. To increase sample size you need base runners. Right now Lewis is about the only Giant that gets on base at a high rate so the sample size will stay small.
-
As for “playing it safe”, well the ultimate playing it safe is signing veterans. They are not supposed to have massive suck issues. And I think you seen were playing it safe has gotten us. It is taking 2+ years of climbing just start seeing sun light at the top of the hole “playing it safe” dug.
Posted by: daveinexile | May 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Cain for Fielder … again? I have a bridge to sell you.
-
@ Freeside: I think that a bit too heavy of Rangers side. But it is nice to see compared to the other extreame.
Posted by: daveinexile | May 24, 2009 at 12:44 PM
As for Cabrera, I could care less how much he makes, he is:
-The only position player, other than Granderson, that's under 30.
-He's 26 yrs old and has avg'd 30+ hrs, 115 rbi, and posted a .300+/.380+ line in his first 5 years.
-He is owed a lot of money @ $21 mil per but that covers what should be his prime years 26-32.
-The payroll is at $115 mil but I would suggest it's the horrible contracts for players not performing such as Dontrelle, Ordonez, Bonderman, Robertson and Guillen that are the problems. Damn..that's $30 mil for 3 SP that have started only 2 gms this year and $28 mil for 2 hitters who have combined for 2 HR's and 23 rbi. Cabrera's salary isn't the problem and $20 mil is in line for a guy who hits .300/.380 w/ 35+ power.
-He plays in the AL so he can be DH'd.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Bowker? Really? That's what's getting you excited? I thought at least you were going to say whiteside, downs or crawford. I love the panda, dont get me wrong. We're last in pitches seen. If we have a team of Sandoval's it will only get worse.
I think you answer your question when you say no runners get on. That's the point. And as far as lewis goes he strikes out way to much, he's not clutch, he has a huge loopy hole in his swing and he plays worse defense then my nephew whose in t-ball. I think that our 4 man rotation and adding pucetas is still better than half the majors. Were only 5.5 games out of the wild card.
Mets, phils, and braves will beat themselves up and 85-88 games will win that division. The Brewers, Cubs, Cards and Now even the reds will do the same central. We can feed off our division (minus the Bums) and make a run at this thing. If we get a young hitter and this season doesn't work out, look where we will be next year then. With Posey, alderson, Bumgarner just about ready.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM
"Plus there's the fact that JPR wouldn't trade Rios for Lincecum so we know how good he is at overvaluing his own players."
JP was the one who started the Rios for Lincecum thing. He wanted to do it so I don't know how you can hold that against him because clearly it would have been a genius move.
I know the Jays are loaded with pitching, but Lind for Cain would be a sweet deal for the Jays and I doubt it's enough for Sabean. Maybe a Purcey-type at the least would need to be added. You can always trade pitching. The Jays can trade Janssen/Litsch etc in the offseason and get a Lind-type prospect (still not a big enough sample size on Lind to consider him an allstar bat).
If the Jays could move Lind for Cain they can acquire Huff/Johnson with a lesser pitcher and the Jays rotation would be dominant. Probably the best in baseball again very soon. It is much easier to upgrade hitting with reasonable contracts through trade/free agency than pitching. And Sabean has Bumgarner/Alderson who will make some noise in 2010 so who knows...
Posted by: Jays2010 | May 24, 2009 at 01:07 PM
From an Orioles fan's point of view, I don't want Cain bad enough to trade either Jones or Markakis straight up, let alone throw in other stuff. Markakis is a top 20 MLBer right now, and Jones is on his way to being one by the end of the year. Huff isn't a big enough bat to get Cain by himself, and our organizational depth among position players is kinda weak. I mentioned in another post about the possibility of Huff for Adrianza and Espineli. The Giants can get their bat without sacrificing Cain.
Trading Cain for Fielder presents problems for SF in that you KNOW that Fielder will walk when his contract is up, which means that they will have basically used Cain to rent Fielder for a year and a half in which they are still more pieces away from getting to the playoffs.
Posted by: mstrchef13 | May 24, 2009 at 01:11 PM
I agree that the Rangers seem to be the best trade partners here. 2 of Blalock, C. Davis, Nelson would be a good start. Maybe + prospect (?)
Posted by: drphonic7 | May 24, 2009 at 01:19 PM
@ Giatnsfan 24: Crawford has what 60 PA’s in AA right now? I like is upside but between playing in pitcher’s league, home games in a pitchers park and his high “k” rate there is a lot that can go wrong. Don’t get me wrong I like him but if looking at guys that will help the big club he has a lot farther to go. Bowker we already know can hit for power in the MLB and that is something the Giants’ could use if he gets the rest of his game up to snuff.
-
Lewis ( aka “Skates” or “the Son of Lonnie Smith”). K’s a lot. So what. He gets on base and on a real offensive team he is table setter. I’ll take K over GiDP any day. As for his swing being messed up, it’s called a slump. Most players have them. Most players can’t keep their OBP above 380 while they are having them though. Lewis’s ‘D” will always be based on athleticism not fundamentals so it will always be ugly but it isn’t terrible if you judge by bottom line instead of style points. I would just suggest you got a bit spoiled watching a younger Bonds in LF.
-
I am not sure what the “ make a run” paragraph is about but if you think this team stumbles into the post season and does anything without a healthy Tim AND Cain your fooling yourself. Even if you get hitter of Cabrera’s abilities for Cain this team would do nothing in the post season.
Posted by: daveinexile | May 24, 2009 at 01:19 PM
1. The Cain for Adam Jones or Nick Markakis suggestion is ridiculous. Cain is really good, but Jones and Markakis are stars. Not happening.
"As for “playing it safe”, well the ultimate playing it safe is signing veterans. They are not supposed to have massive suck issues. And I think you seen were playing it safe has gotten us. It is taking 2+ years of climbing just start seeing sun light at the top of the hole “playing it safe” dug."
Huh? I wouldn't call the Giants playing it safe. They have taken some HUGE (and misinformed) risks over the 2006-2008 offseasons. Just because those risks weren't trades doesn't mean they didn't take trades.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 24, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Trading Cain for Fielder presents problems for SF in that you KNOW that Fielder will walk when his contract is up, which means that they will have basically used Cain to rent Fielder for a year and a half in which they are still more pieces away from getting to the playoffs.
Posted by: mstrchef13
The Giants wouldn't trade for Fielder unless they get him a new contract....plain and simple....Whatever bat you trade for, you build around....Holliday, Longoria, Howard, Fielder....
the player you rent is someone like Huff or Derrick Lee.
Huff is worth no more than Ishikawa...you'll be lucky too get that since he's walking at the end of the year!!
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 01:24 PM
AS far as Lewis goes, I will say the biggest problem is that he isnt a leadoff hitter. Bochy has been playing him wrong the whole time, but that isn't that weird for him to do that.
Let me flip the question then and ask you what is the giants 3 year plan if your not trading?
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 01:25 PM
P.S.- This is what your 2010 Giants are going to be minus Sandoval. ( this is todays lineup)
CF Rowand
SS Renteria
RF Winn
DH Molina
LF Lewis
1B Ishikawa
3B Uribe
2B Burriss
C Whiteside
P Zito
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Giantsfan24.....Winn/Molina will not be with the Giants next year unless Molina signs a 2 yr deal this summer....both will be traded this summer....Whiteside??? what are you high???...Ishikawa is done with the Giants.....just like the idiot who thinks Bowker has a future with the Giants.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 01:31 PM
melonis rex: The Cain for Adam Jones or Nick Markakis suggestion is ridiculous. Cain is really good, but Jones and Markakis are stars. Not happening.
Why is that??? You have a potential ace for a Young OF.....this is what the O's would have too give up or a Brian Roberts.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 01:33 PM
"We're last in pitches seen. If we have a team of Sandoval's it will only get worse. "
Your logic is odd. So, if you had 9 clones of your second best hitter in the lineup (let's assume the team defense stays the same as it is now), the team will get worse offensively?
Sandoval isn't great, but he can be an above average 3B.
The lack of walks are concerning with him, yes, but the only big problem with him I have is his LD% significantly dropping from '08 to '09; he's hitting weaker balls as opposed to spraying line drives everywhere.
Other teams do MUCH worse at 3B.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 24, 2009 at 01:35 PM
melonis: Don't give confuse Risks for terrible moves. That's a big difference.
Winn will be gone. So who do want there?
If molina goes, Who do want there? Will posey be ready to start next season? If not, who, Steve Holm? This is our team next year if we don't start being aggressive.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 01:38 PM
Thats why I hope Molina signs a 2 yr deal....its up too Sabean if he'll do it...Molina already cameout and stated he wanted too be here....bring up Posey as backup next year and in year 2 Molina will be the backup to Posey. Trade Winn and start Schierholtz in RF. He definately deserves a shot.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 01:41 PM
I'm fine with that other than bringing up posey to ride pine. Maybe a september call up but you never bring a prospect up to be a back up. Leave him in Fresno and let him get experience.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Nate McLouth for Matt Cain, or throw in Adam LaRoche if Pittsburgh can get someone else. Maybe an Emannuel Burriss? Not sure if the Giants can take on all that salary though.
I love McLouth but I'd make that deal as a Pirates fan, and I think that would be solid value for Cain as he is also a young star and fairly cheap.
He'd step in to the #3 hole and they can trade Winn or Lewis, because no one will take Rowand off their hands.
The Pirates would still be well off, but will be seriously lacking power. However, with a future outfield of Morgan, Moss, McCutcheon, Tabata, Young, Grossman, and Pearce, at least 3 will pan out. Cain will be the frontline starter the Pirates need, taking pressure of Maholm and Duke.
Posted by: bigpat | May 24, 2009 at 01:54 PM
You definetly don't want Posey up in the majors as a back up next year. He hasn't played above single A and could benefit from another full year. IF you do bring him up then you want him to play everyday and get as many at bats as possible. As a back up to Molina he wouldn't see 300 at bats probably.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 01:56 PM
bigpat: Nate McLouth for Matt Cain, or throw in Adam LaRoche if Pittsburgh can get someone else. Maybe an Emannuel Burriss? Not sure if the Giants can take on all that salary though.
Hey BigPat...do you know that the Giants are considered a big market team now since they have there own TV contract like the Mets/Cubs/Yanks/WhiteSox and Braves??? The Giants can bid on any FA they want and takeon any contract...they have the $$$. Second, Adam LaRouche stinks!!!! I wouldn't take him....he can't hit and isn't a better 1b defensively than Ishikawa. Veto that trade!!!!
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:00 PM
LaRoche will start hitting in the second half of the season, and he's better than Ishikawa. They'd just have him for one year, if he was a throw in to make the deal, I'd do it.
I'd also think about involving Andrew McCutcheon if he can bring in someone like Cain. I know he is a top prospect, but if he can get us starting pitching, I'd rather him go than McLouth because Nate is proven.
Posted by: bigpat | May 24, 2009 at 02:07 PM
hahahaha WOW these giants' fans are stupid..cain may be good but the o's would hang up on them if they said they wanted markakis/jones + some...haha you think way too highly of your players..they also wouldnt take ishikawa straight up for huff..haha
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | May 24, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Cain to a team like Texas or Toronto makes sense. Texas has a surplus of young talent and could contend as soon as next year. Toronto could even contend this year with one more pitcher. For Texas, they'd need to include a slugger or two, which they have and for Toronto they need to include Snider and someone else.
Posted by: d32123 | May 24, 2009 at 02:17 PM
thebigfish99: hahahaha WOW these giants' fans are stupid..cain may be good but the o's would hang up on them if they said they wanted markakis/jones + some...haha you think way too highly of your players..they also wouldnt take ishikawa straight up for huff..haha
No one said Cain for Jones and Markakis you dork!! Cain for one or the other!! And as far as Huff...they could easily get him for Ishikawa since he is a FA and walking at the end of the year anyway and Ishikawa isn't even Salary Arbitration eligible. He could be a good 1B for them for several years.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Thats why I hope Molina signs a 2 yr deal....its up too Sabean if he'll do it...Molina already cameout and stated he wanted too be here....bring up Posey as backup next year and in year 2 Molina will be the backup to Posey. Trade Winn and start Schierholtz in RF. He definately deserves a shot.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 01:41 PM
Why?!
Posey will be ready soon.
He will get called up to AA.
Next year he will be with the club out of ST or midyear.
Why does Ishikawa currently waste a spot on the 40 man roster? A sub 600 OPS from your starting 1st baseman? I know Loney does not destroy the ball but good god.
Cain should require one high ceiling pitching prospect and two decent hitters.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | May 24, 2009 at 02:24 PM
THELITTLEFISH99: Your like a child that wanders in a movie and wants to know whats going on.
The O's were first brought up by a Yankees fan.
Posted by: Giantsfan24 | May 24, 2009 at 02:26 PM
i said markakis/jones not markakis and jones you DORK...no way theyd do that...and they could do better for huff
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | May 24, 2009 at 02:28 PM
"No one said Cain for Jones and Markakis you dork!! Cain for one or the other!! And as far as Huff...they could easily get him for Ishikawa since he is a FA and walking at the end of the year anyway and Ishikawa isn't even Salary Arbitration eligible. He could be a good 1B for them for several years.
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:20 PM"
Why the hell would the O's take Ishikawa?.....
They need a double A first baseman?
Markakis is a monster, and Jones has all the tools to make him a monster.
Markakis would take Cain plus Sandoval. Maybe Cain plus Lewis and Scott Barnes.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | May 24, 2009 at 02:30 PM
Here we go .... a damn Dodger fan in here...dude...go away.....karma is biting you guys in the ass for all the years you guys talked crap about Bonds and steroids...at least he never said he was taking female pregnancy pills...thats just too damn funny!!!!
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:31 PM
at least the dodgers have a 9 game lead on you guys
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | May 24, 2009 at 02:33 PM
"Here we go .... a damn Dodger fan in here...dude...go away.....karma is biting you guys in the ass for all the years you guys talked crap about Bonds and steroids...at least he never said he was taking female pregnancy pills...thats just too damn funny!!!!
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:31 PM"
You are awesome.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | May 24, 2009 at 02:37 PM
I don't think it was a Yankee fan that suggested any of the guys for Cain BUT what was mentioned by a couple of different people was a package centerd around 1 of either Jones, Markakis and Roberts plus prospects for Cain. What I said was people can debate whether Jones OR Markakis is a fair deal straight up for Cain, but definetly not one or the other PLUS additional pieces going to SF. That would be overpaying for Cain.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 02:42 PM
Wow...9 game lead....who the F cares bigfish...they are suppose too have the lead...they were favorites..them and the D'backs in the division. But if i'm not mistaken the Giants have beaten the Dodgers 4 of the last 6 times.....The dodgers will choke in the playoffs just like last year....when they win something they can come talk crap!!!
Posted by: sfgiantsfan | May 24, 2009 at 02:49 PM
Matt Cain is overrated.
His velocity has been dropping on his fastball for the past four years.
His walks are still high.
His K/9 is at an all time low.
He has been very lucky this year. A Ba/BiP of .272 and an LOB% of 89%!!!! <-- Luck.
That shiny ERA is about to shoot up pretty soon when his peripherals normalize.
Sabean should sell high while he can.
Posted by: Google Boy | May 24, 2009 at 02:57 PM
once the giants finish over .500 then you can talk crap
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | May 24, 2009 at 03:00 PM
I am not big on these little sessions of hate..
But a SFG fan has nothing to say to a LAD fan about winning in the playoffs. NONE
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | May 24, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Matt Cain's this year thru 10 games:
6 hrs allowed in 60 IP.
54 hits in those 60 IP
7 quality starts of 6 IP and 3 or less runs allowed.
His 1 weakness? Walks allowed w/ 25 BB allowed in 60 IP.
What's so great about him? He's FREEKIN' 24 yrs old and in his 100+ starts has a career ERA of 3.63!! Please tell me how many young, effective and cost controled SP are available on the open market right now? If you're not growing them then you're paying big bucks for them as a FA.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | May 24, 2009 at 03:08 PM