« Rosenthal On Mets & Phillies |
Main
| Looking Back At May 2008 »
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [May 1, 2009 at 2:23pm CST]
SI.com's Jon Heyman has a new column up; here are some highlights:
- Heyman spoke with a Nats person who described college pitcher Stephen Strasburg's curve as a "legit hammer." The Nats will have the chance to draft him with their first overall pick this June.
- The Nats could have a solid young rotation soon if they add Strasburg to go along with Shairon Martis and Jordan Zimmermann, both 22. John Lannan and Scott Olsen are only 24 and 25, respectively.
- There has been contact between the Nats and Pedro Martinez, though Heyman writes that Pedro makes more sense for a team trying to win now.
- Speculation that Cliff Lee could be dealt is "not crazy at all," especially considering that last year's C.C. Sabathia deal worked well for both the Indians and Brewers.
- Heyman also weighs in on the latest Alex Rodriguez controversy.
I don't think the Indians would trade Cliff Lee, especially in this weak division, unless they got a blue chip starting pitching prospect in return. The Indians have a loaded farm system (LaPorta, Santana, Weglarz, Rondon, de la Cruz, Brantley etc.), but they lack a future number 1 starter.
Posted by: Alex Trebek | May 01, 2009 at 02:29 PM
The Nationals also have Balester and Cabrera. They could be very dangerous in 2010 and beyond.
Posted by: PWHjort | May 01, 2009 at 02:32 PM
i'd go with beyond. They have NO bullpen, their bench is non-existent and other than Dunn and Zimmerman their offense isn't a ton to write home about. Unless you think Dukes will put it together. Even if he does, its not enough. With Strasburg next year, they're a 75 win team at best without other major additions.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | May 01, 2009 at 02:52 PM
"The Nationals also have Balester and Cabrera. They could be very dangerous in 2010 and beyond."
Cabrera was signed to a one year deal, and he's garbage, so I wouldn't expect him back for "2010 and beyond." Zimmerman, Strasburg, and Lannan could be a nice 1-2-3 but uhhhhhhh the first has made like 3 major league starts and the other hasn't even pitched in the minors!? I think it's possible the Nats will be decent in a few years but definitely in the "beyond" area of time.
Posted by: mford | May 01, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Um....Heyman does realize that Lee isn't a free agent after this season like CC was last year right?
Lee isn't going anywhere. Even if the Indians fall out of the race (they are still only 4 out right now), they'll keep him for 2010.
They don't lose any real players to free agency other than DeRosa.
Westbrook will be 100% then, and the Tribe will have one of the best rotations in the AL if stud Hector Rondon is ready by then. Even if he's not, they'll have a solid rotation.
2010 is the year they'll have a legit shot at winning it all!
Posted by: Hermie13 | May 01, 2009 at 04:51 PM
The only concern about Strasburg is whether his questionable mechanics lead to injury. The guy's breaking ball has curve break with hard slider speed. If he gets it over for strikes, and I haven't heard anything to the contrary, it will be the most hittable pitch in baseball. Combining that with a 100+ fastball will be absolutely sick. Basically a young, right-handed Randy Johnson.
Posted by: AA | May 01, 2009 at 05:05 PM
"If he gets it over for strikes, and I haven't heard anything to the contrary, it will be the most hittable pitch in baseball. "
Livan Hernandez has a fastball he'd like to show you.
I'm assuming you meant unhittable, I just had to do it.
Posted by: bigpat | May 02, 2009 at 07:39 PM
So I haven't posted in awhile, due to a lack of important things that have gone on in the trade market. So here is my question for Tim, Cork, Ben, or whomever chooses to respond.
Does no one feel sympathy for Barry Bonds? I mean, A-Rod will be allowed to come back even though there is strong evidence he has been doing steroids for more of his career than Bonds allegedly had. Bonds would easily break 800 homers if he had been allowed to play last year and this year (and possibly next year). Why is it ok for A-Rod to come back, and meanwhile Clemens and Bonds caught the cold shoulder.
Of course A-Rod has a contract, but this is definitely one of those situations where you turn to your insurance, as I'm sure they must have some insurance on the contract. It to me just seems unfair. Even if A-Rod does break Bond's record, he never will truly break it because Barry could have hit more had MLB not given him the cold shoulder.
Does no one else feel that this is complete and utter BS? I'm saying this as a Bonds fan, not as a Red Sox fan. I fully feel that the Yankees should not have to cough up 150 million dollars and eat A-Rod's contract (even though if he did it in pinstripes this would be the "right" thing to do). It just bothers the crap outta me and takes even more legitimacy out of the home run record due to the fact that Bonds isn't done yet. He still wants to come back and will play for the league minimum. He's got something to prove and I think would but up 30 homers a season easy and probably hit right around the .300 mark as a DH for an AL team. I want to kick the crap out of teams like Toronto, Kansas City and the Mariners just to name a few that could highly benefit by coughing up 500k. If he gets injured, sucks, or goes to jail, its 500 grand which in the long run means nothing. Meanwhile if say Toroto added Bonds, it might make them a true playoff contender. They have a solid rotation, good hitting, good fielding, ect. What they lack is the powerhouse that Vernon Wells was supposed to provide. With Bonds in that lineup, everyone will see better pitches.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | May 03, 2009 at 11:06 AM
As far as the pitch tipping stuff, I don't think even A-Rod is that stupid. I give this a 3% chance of being credible. I'll have to read her book though. She definitely is a very thorough reporter before she releases information, which I can appreciate.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | May 03, 2009 at 11:11 AM