![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jonathan Sanchez's Trade Value Dropping | Main | Morosi On Penny, Hermida, Padres »
A few bits and pieces from around the web:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Clay, I love you bro but don't be saying things like that. The Red Sox not trading you away even though you didn't do all that well in the bigs and even though they needed a catcher and SS obviously means they like you.
Posted by: Umair | June 16, 2009 at 10:13 PM
Boston fans, Yunel Escobar and Kenshin Kawakami for Clay Bucholz and Jed Lowrie. Would ya'll be interested?
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 16, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Nationals need to just fire Acta already. Look at how the Mets lingered and then fired Willie at the worst possible time. No one even was talking about how he deserved to be fired then.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 16, 2009 at 10:19 PM
"Yunel Escobar and Kenshin Kawakami for Clay Bucholz and Jed Lowrie."
i think the sox can do alittle bit better then this personally, but you certainly have something to build on here.
Posted by: 04Forever | June 16, 2009 at 10:32 PM
"Boston fans, Yunel Escobar and Kenshin Kawakami for Clay Bucholz and Jed Lowrie. Would ya'll be interested?"
Like 04Forever said, I think we can get more for a potential Ace. Buchholz has been dominant for 8 months now. He needs to be in the majors.
Posted by: soxfan93 | June 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM
" Yunel Escobar and Kenshin Kawakami for Clay Bucholz and Jed Lowrie. Would ya'll be interested?"
No Thanks. Bucholz will get to Fenway, just a bit of a pitching glut at the moment and where would Kawakami fit anyway? He certainly wouldn't start and Boston has the best BP in baseball and Kawakami's salary at 6.7M until 2011 is atrocious.
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 10:37 PM
Buchholz and Bard for Escobar and Flowers, id do that. thats better value for the sox atleast
Posted by: 04Forever | June 16, 2009 at 10:39 PM
"Buchholz and Bard for Escobar and Flowers, id do that. thats better value for the sox atleast"
Tyler Flowers was traded to Chicago for Javier Vasquez.
Posted by: soxfan93 | June 16, 2009 at 10:40 PM
"Tyler Flowers was traded to Chicago for Javier Vasquez."
wow really, cant believed i missed that. scratch flowers for Freddy Freeman
Posted by: 04Forever | June 16, 2009 at 10:45 PM
Would you like that trade if Flowers was swapped with Gonzalez and Brandon Jones? Ya'lls pen is the best in baseball i know but Okajima is the only lefty you have.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 16, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Freeman is almost an untouchable. He's only 19 and has already really impressed bobby and the rest of the front office at spring training. Middle of next year or Opening Day 2011 at the latest Kotchman will be gone and he'll begin his tenure.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM
im wondering if the braves would even part with escobar to begin with, hes pretty solid. i think desperation would draw that trade more then rebuilding. starting isnt really even the braves issue anyway
Posted by: 04Forever | June 16, 2009 at 11:00 PM
"Freeman is almost an untouchable"
You actually think that Boston would trade Bucholz to Atlanta for any prospect that they have anyway??
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 11:01 PM
I know starting pitching isn't really our issue but i'm thinking long term with all this. If the Braves fall out of this I'd like them to be able to trade someone like vasquez and kawakami(if there's anyone who'd take his contract) or maybe even both and have a real good rotation next year and free up money so they could pursue a holliday and valverde this off season. I think the Braves may be willing to part with Escobar just because his personality doesn't fit the team and the players don't like him either for various reasons.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 16, 2009 at 11:09 PM
Mets bullpen is the best in baseball
Red sox are a close second
Posted by: beastOftheEast | June 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM
Sox bullpen is better than the Mets by a decent amount..
Posted by: fitz | June 16, 2009 at 11:17 PM
"Mets bullpen is the best in baseball
Red sox are a close second"
Are you high?
Posted by: soxfan93 | June 16, 2009 at 11:17 PM
"Mets bullpen is the best in baseballRed sox are a close second"
Hahaha! I have been awake since 4:00 this morning, and could blow an 0.12 right now and even I don't believe that.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | June 16, 2009 at 11:28 PM
could probably consider yunel escobar and maybe mike gonzalez for penny argenis diaz and delcarmen
Posted by: Tripper | June 16, 2009 at 11:46 PM
Every single one of the Red Sox current relief pitchers is good enough to be a setup man for a championship caliber team (with the possible exception of Bard who has as high of an upside as anyone in the pen).
If you only consider the pitchers in the bullpen as it's currently constructed (as hunter jones, javier lopez and michael bowden won't be back up barring injury or trade), the pitchers have a combined ERA of 2.36 over 168 innings. The Mets do have a good bullpen, but realistically it doesn't hold a candle to Bostons.
Posted by: gfulla | June 16, 2009 at 11:47 PM
could probably consider yunel escobar and maybe mike gonzalez for penny argenis diaz and delcarmen
Posted by: Tripper | June 16, 2009 at 11:46 PM
You're high, too. Yunel is decent, IMO, but would command more than MDC and Penny. Diaz has not proven himself to be a solid Major Leaguer for the future. For some reason, I'm still not impressed with Escobar, though.
Posted by: soxfan93 | June 16, 2009 at 11:50 PM
The Mets have a good bullpen. The thing is Jerry just uses the same 3-4 guys (K-Rod, Feliciano, Parnell, and Green). Stokes is underused and haven't had much luck with a 2nd LOOGY (Takahashi was more of a longman and didnt have good numbers against lefties. Switzer hasn't been great but very small sample size).
Red Sox pen is better because of its depth but the Mets' pen is right behind them.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 16, 2009 at 11:53 PM
The Rays have signed Bellatti who is out of HS and Nommensen (8th round selection) ... just a little note to your entry!
There is also a word spinning around they have signed prep pitcher Jacob Partridge (18th round)!
Posted by: Burgi_14 | June 17, 2009 at 01:13 AM
Note to Stan Kasten: Jim Riggleman is NOT the answer.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | June 17, 2009 at 01:51 AM
Several teams have signed a dozen or more players early on, which is really surprising.Boston has officially signed 14 draft picks, including #2 pick Alex Wilson and that is not including #10 Brandon Jacobs that said he had signed, then retracted after he reported he got 2nd round money, probably because he is a FB player for Auburn and Boston wanted it hushed up until later on and he really is signed for high $$$.
Posted by: johns | June 17, 2009 at 02:07 AM
Tomahawk368 agreed that the Sox have the best BP over the Mets midtown, I get confused sometimes on posts also and yeah, the Sox BP is really nice with 7 guys (counting Masterson) that Francona has -0- problems bringing in in the 8th, or 9th inning to shut down any rally by the opposition.
It's also worth pointing out that other than Oki-J, every one of those guys can "bring it" with FB's in the mid to upper 90's and not limited to just 1 off speed pitch as well, but multiple pitches that they can throw for strikes at any given time.
Posted by: johns | June 17, 2009 at 04:01 AM
"You actually think that Boston would trade Bucholz to Atlanta for any prospect that they have anyway??"
Umm, I am sure Theo would give him up for Jason Heyward, and I am sure braves fans would kill Wren if he traded him.
Posted by: berigan | June 17, 2009 at 05:17 AM
Jays have the best pen in baseball when everyone is healthy. Things have been off a bit lately because Tallet basically one of the jays better long relievers is currently our #2 starter -_-, or well #1 while Docs hurt.
Posted by: Devmac | June 17, 2009 at 07:13 AM
A mature interview for the laptop thief? And the 3 stooges were model citizens.
Posted by: Russell | June 17, 2009 at 07:37 AM
"Umm, I am sure Theo would give him up for Jason Heyward, and I am sure braves fans would kill Wren if he traded him."
Not hardly. Not even the Braves Poster prospect Hansen has put up numbers even this year at AAA like Bucholz, much yet thrown a No No in the bigs..
Posted by: johns | June 17, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Just think how good the Mets bullpen would be if yall still had O'Day...thanks by the way!!!
Posted by: JH32 | June 17, 2009 at 09:07 AM
"Not hardly. Not even the Braves Poster prospect Hansen has put up numbers even this year at AAA like Bucholz, much yet thrown a No No in the bigs.."
He's been in the majors for 2 starts for far so i'm not complaining about the lack of a no-hitter, albeit he did have a perfect game through 3 2/3 in his debut. As for there stats at AAA Hanson's were
1.49era, 0.86whip and 12.27Kp9
Bucholz
1.75era, 0.82whip and 7.93Kp9
also Hanson is 22 and Bucholz is 25 in a month
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 17, 2009 at 09:37 AM
And yeah Heyward goes anywhere Wren will be......... IDK he's already pretty hated by most.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 17, 2009 at 09:39 AM
So now you understand why the Sox have pretty much -0- intention of trading him away. Boston, before the season when they didn't even have a catcher refused to trade Bucholz for Saltamach, Teagarden, or Montera and they desperately needed a catcher and Bucholz was coming off of a very shaky season in 2008. Now Bucholz has rebounded strongly, so why would they give him away for something they don't even need as an upgrade?
On the Hansen vs Bucholz. Gotcha.. I saw some graphs a couple weeks ago and it was pretty close, didn't realize that Hansen's K rate was that high. He's doing pretty nifty :-)
Posted by: johns | June 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM
no problem johns, i didn't think boston would consider dealing bucholz i was just trying to get a conversation started and see what people thought the braves could net for escobar
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 17, 2009 at 11:05 AM
How about Jason Donald and Lou Marson for Buchholz?
Posted by: baxter | June 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM
baxter,
no, Buchholz is a top, front of the rotation, young, cost controlled arm. He will only be traded (extremely unlikely) for top tier talent like A. Gonzales, not for 2 prospects. You would have to blow Theo away for the Red Sox to trade Buchholz at this point.
Okie was not a closer in Japan, he was a lefty specialist and actually got hammered pretty regularly in NPB. It was not until the Red Sox pitching staff got him to throw the forkball that he had so much success.
Posted by: CircusFresh | June 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM
icedrake523:
Did you just compare the Mets team with the Nats? Mets were suppose to be winning.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | June 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Donald and Marson were both top 50 prospects going into this season and both are MLB ready. If I'm not mistaken, the Red Sox offered Bard for Marson a few months ago, and Amaro countered by asking for Buchholz. Theo recently offered Penny for Donald, so you know there's some interest. I think its at least a reasonable starting point.
Posted by: baxter | June 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM
"If I'm not mistaken, the Red Sox offered Bard for Marson a few months ago, and Amaro countered by asking for Buchholz.
Posted by: baxter | June 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM"
It was actually the other way around. The Red Sox not surprisingly quickly turned that down.
"Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe reports the Phillies and Red Sox are discussing trade options concerning catcher Lou Marson.
According to Cafardo, the Phils want either Clay Buchholz or Daniel Bard, but the Sox “aren’t going there. 3/23/09”
Posted by: TradeYouk | June 17, 2009 at 01:02 PM
"How about Jason Donald and Lou Marson for Buchholz? "
why thank you for that bag of crap, how generous of you. why would we take two prospects who are tanking in value while buchholz has been absolutely stunning this year and pretty much every year?
screw donald, if anything it starts with dominic brown
Posted by: 04Forever | June 17, 2009 at 02:05 PM
The problem with Buchholz is that he is too good for the minors but not ready for the majors yet. He has shown flashes of greatness while being up with the Sox, but has also stunk up the place as well. The perfect scenario for him would be to go to a club who is rebuilding and let him take the ball every 5th day in a major league rotation where there is not this pressure to perform or be demoted. He is going to have is ups and downs like 99% of pitchers do but there is still an ace there. I just don't know if we will ever see what he can become with the way the Sox are handling him though. I understand the Sox thinking though, they are the best team in baseball and are in the toughest division in baseball and really can't afford to let him work out his kinks while they are trying to win a world series.
Posted by: yanks09 | June 17, 2009 at 04:22 PM
Any yanks fan drinking truth serum would tell you that "the problem with Buchholz" is that he's in the Red Sox organization.
95mph fastball with good movement. Outstanding change. Outstanding curve.
He's excellent when two of his pitches work; dominant when he has three of them going.
He lost focus last year. Could that be because he's young and was dating the PH playmate of the year? Who knows... Hopefully when he gets to the bigs this time his head and his command/control and right.
The stuff is there.
Posted by: DirtyWaterBeatdown | June 17, 2009 at 06:03 PM