![]() |
|
|
| |
« Brewers, Braves Not Discussing Vazquez | Main | Kip Wells: Free Agent »
We've picked up on a few rumblings recently concerning the Braves' Yunel Escobar. From the Red Sox having interest to the Royals "coveting" the shortstop, the rumors have been flying. Well, MLB.com's Mark Bowman would like to set the record straight:
"Look I understand the entertainment value of the rumor market that will
swirl over the next few weeks leading up to the trade deadline," Bowman wrote Monday evening. "But at
the same time, I think it's time to take Yunel Escobar's name out of
the mix.
Teams have certainly called to express interest in
Escobar and with his stubborn personality the talented shortstop has
given the Braves at least reason to ponder the possibility of moving
him.
But from what I've gathered, the Braves have zero desire to move Escobar."
The 26-year-old shortstop is batting .405 with runners in scoring position this season and leads the Braves with 42 RBI. Oh, and he's costing the club just $425K this year.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
WooooooHooooooo....that is the best news I have heard in a long, long time.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 06, 2009 at 05:18 PM
THANK YOU. Yunel Escobar's been the Braves best hitting this year (I'll say even better than Chipper Jones and maybe even Brian McCann) and as bad as the Braves offense has been, it would make zero sense to trade him.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | July 06, 2009 at 05:18 PM
thank god!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: bravesphanatic | July 06, 2009 at 05:21 PM
Perhaps we can also put to bed the rumors about the Braves trying to trade Vazquez too. Dude has been their ace and one of the top 5 pitchers in the NL this year, despite his win/loss record.
Posted by: scottandwtb | July 06, 2009 at 05:23 PM
Mark Bowman-voice of reason. I think McCann since the glasses has been no. 1 offensively but Escobar has been fantastic with the bat and hopefully will improve in the field as he regains his lateral quickness
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 05:23 PM
what do yall think it would take to get dunn and willingham from washington
Posted by: dlsmkt2004 | July 06, 2009 at 05:27 PM
Perhaps we can also put to bed the rumors about the Braves trying to trade Vazquez too. Dude has been their ace and one of the top 5 pitchers in the NL this year, despite his win/loss record.
Posted by: scottandwtb | July 06, 2009 at 05:23 PM
I'd trade him if there's an overwhelming offer and I don't think he's untouchable because of our pitching depth. That's exactly why trading Escobar made no sense though, we have no SS depth behind him throughout the entire organization
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 05:28 PM
escobar was the only thread of hope for driving in runs when mccann was out.
Posted by: kevin1013 | July 06, 2009 at 05:28 PM
how in the world are there no trade rumors about kris medlin?? i love the guy, but in a package starting with him, how much more will it take to get Dunn? throwing dunn in that lineup and taking frenchy would make that a scary lineup.
Posted by: sconia25 | July 06, 2009 at 05:29 PM
God, this guy is so overrated
Posted by: Peavo | July 06, 2009 at 05:30 PM
I still bet he gets traded.
Posted by: revive85 | July 06, 2009 at 05:31 PM
how in the world are there no trade rumors about kris medlin?? i love the guy, but in a package starting with him, how much more will it take to get Dunn? throwing dunn in that lineup and taking frenchy would make that a scary lineup.
Posted by: sconia25 | July 06, 2009 at 05:29 PM
Because Medlen is really, really good and shouldn't be traded unless it is for a YOUNG hitter who isn't a rental. Dunn is only signed through next year and makes a ton of money. He is also grossly overrated. I think the Braves are rebuilding...and Kris Medlen is part of that rebuilding.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 06, 2009 at 05:36 PM
Medlen is viewed by the rest of the majors as at best a #3 hence not a centerpiece of a big trade. That's my thought on why he isn't rumored to be on the move. The Braves would be smart to wait until the off-season and use Kotchman and some pitching prospects to get Dunn to play first for a year or two (if he accepts arb.) and then hand the job to freeman
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 05:40 PM
kris medlin is great, but theres honestly no room for him with the way everyone is pitching. They are right in the middle of a very weak nl east race right now, and with their pitching, can really do some damage in the postseason. its time to expedite the rebuilding process. If not dunn, who else? any other perennial 40 HR guys available? i actually hate dunn, but we need to do something!!!
Posted by: sconia25 | July 06, 2009 at 05:41 PM
That's good to hear.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 06, 2009 at 05:42 PM
I'm glad that escobar is staying but I think we need to move vasquez for a clean up hitter if huddy is back and good
Posted by: Bravesfan101 | July 06, 2009 at 05:45 PM
Because Medlen is really, really good and shouldn't be traded unless it is for a YOUNG hitter who isn't a rental. Dunn is only signed through next year and makes a ton of money. He is also grossly overrated. I think the Braves are rebuilding...and Kris Medlen is part of that rebuilding.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 06, 2009 at 05:36 PM
Medlen is a good prospect. Dunn is nowhere near overrated, much less grossly overrated. It would take Medlen plus pieces to get Dunn. His career power numbers are better than Teixeira's for half as much money.
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 05:48 PM
yunel escobar and cash for tony penja jr....
Posted by: GeorgeBrettShitsHimself | July 06, 2009 at 05:52 PM
why not get alexis rios from toronto would be nice
Posted by: dlsmkt2004 | July 06, 2009 at 05:55 PM
i want give a shout out to mlbtraderumors.com,
i know its their job and all, but they stay on top of everything! they do their job well and keep braves fans very informed! there is no other site on the net that even comes close to the coverage of trade rumblings than mlbtraderumors. god, i love this site!
Posted by: bravesphanatic | July 06, 2009 at 06:01 PM
i want give a shout out to mlbtraderumors.com,
i know its their job and all, but they stay on top of everything! they do their job well and keep braves fans very informed! there is no other site on the net that even comes close to the coverage of trade rumblings than mlbtraderumors. god, i love this site!
Posted by: bravesphanatic | July 06, 2009 at 06:01 PM
x2 Kudos
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 06:03 PM
Dunn, if he plays 1B, is a good idea. His defense isn't otherworldly bad at first but in left field he negates his offensive ability. Just to give you an idea he was worth 1.3 WAR (5.9 Million) last year and is on pace to finish near 1.8 WAR (roughly 8.2 Million) this year. He is the worst fielding starting OF in the majors and should either DH or play 1B. The ideal LF solution is Holliday but we can't take on that contract and I wouldn't trade Schafer, Freeman, or Heyward for him
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 06:06 PM
why not get alexis rios from toronto would be nice
His contract
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 06:14 PM
I'd rather have a horrible defense OF that hits 40 homers than a good than a great defensive OF with 5 homers.
Posted by: nymforlife | July 06, 2009 at 06:22 PM
Dunn, if he plays 1B, is a good idea. His defense isn't otherworldly bad at first but in left field he negates his offensive ability. Just to give you an idea he was worth 1.3 WAR (5.9 Million) last year and is on pace to finish near 1.8 WAR (roughly 8.2 Million) this year. He is the worst fielding starting OF in the majors and should either DH or play 1B. The ideal LF solution is Holliday but we can't take on that contract and I wouldn't trade Schafer, Freeman, or Heyward for him
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 06:06 PM
When your starting left fielder is G. Anderson your point about defense is mute. As bad as our offense is, Dunn will help us win more games than pop flies that he drops.
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 06:28 PM
I'd rather have a horrible defense OF that hits 40 homers than a good than a great defensive OF with 5 homers.
Posted by: nymforlife | July 06, 2009 at 06:22 PM
thank you
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 06:29 PM
The ideal LF solution is Holliday but we can't take on that contract and I wouldn't trade Schafer, Freeman, or Heyward for him
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 06:06 PM
Dunn makes more $$$ than Holliday.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 06, 2009 at 06:48 PM
I don't think you guys understand just how horrifically bad Dunn is as a fielder. He's been the worst defensive player in baseball over the past 5 years. He gives back between 70 and 80 percent of his value at the plate with his awful fielding. I don't even know if I'd want the Braves to take him on if it only meant assuming the rest of his contract, let alone giving up something of value to get him. The people who still think Moneyball was all about OBP and SLG are the people who have made Adam Dunn one of the most overrated players in the game.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 06, 2009 at 07:14 PM
Come on, the Royals still have some Karma that needs to come back to them for the Dye for Neifi Perez trade. Teahen for Escobar would complete that episode of Karma.
Posted by: basicslop | July 06, 2009 at 07:36 PM
Dunn makes more $$$ than Holliday.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 06, 2009 at 06:48 PM
Pretty sure that Holliday is 13.5 million and i know dunn only makes 10 a year.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 07:41 PM
When your starting left fielder is G. Anderson your point about defense is mute. As bad as our offense is, Dunn will help us win more games than pop flies that he drops.
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 06:28 PM
Fair point that Dunn wouldn't be that much of a downgrade defensively from Anderson, but he's starting to hit and I don't think the Braves will look to replace him. Still if the Braves get Dunn it should be as a first baseman but I think that is a move for the off-season when you can juggle payroll and players around. The Braves will actually have the payroll flexibility that with a couple of moves they could afford to have dunn at first and holliday in left
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Nixa did you see the bit about as an outfielder adam dunn and nyger morgan have roughly the same value? That is just how bad Dunn is defensively
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 07:47 PM
The Braves just need to wait until the offseason to acquire any players. I am not for trading anyone but Jeff Franceour and Kelly Johnson. They could possibly get Corey Hart for those two players? I dont know.
There is a ton of options the Braves can do during the offseason. They are right in the middle of buying or selling. They can trade Vazquez and or Derek Lowe to free up some salary space. I would love to see the Braves try to sign Matt Holliday.
If they sign Holliday, release Franceour, dont resign Garrett Anderson, and acquire Corey Hart(i.e. trading KJ and franceour or another package), their lineup in 2010 could be...
1. Mclouth
2. Escobar
3. Jones
4. Holliday
5. McCan
6. Hart
7. Kotchman
8. Prado
9. Pitcher
With that lineup, you could average 5 or 6 runs a game, and with the braves' starting pitchers ERA of 3.75 this year so far, the Braves could easily win 100 games in 2010 and start another Playoff run.
Posted by: BrentWt34 | July 06, 2009 at 08:14 PM
Nixa37,
Well said regarding Dunn, the guy is a perfect fit as a DH 4-5 days a week and part time OF/1B the fewest games possible. Watch him in the field for several games bumble his way on a line drive in the OF to a ball, or try and track a fly ball that he actually has to move several steps on and he is a complete liability in the field, he is some better as a 1st baseman, but he does not even like playing that position.
Ideally if he is traded at all, an AL team where his horrible glove could be put in moth balls like David Ortiz for a few inter league games only would be the perfect place and only use his bat.
Posted by: johns | July 06, 2009 at 08:26 PM
The Braves should trade Vazquez for Nelson Cruz. They get another power pitcher and we get a right-handed power bat. I love Javy and have wanted him for years, but we have enough pitching depth and he is the most tradable pitcher. This would be a win-win for both clubs.
Posted by: Thundersticks | July 06, 2009 at 09:31 PM
I'm glad escobar is staying but we need a cleanup hitter bad and i want the braves to trade javy for one if huddy is good .... and not Holliday
Posted by: Bravesfan101 | July 06, 2009 at 09:35 PM
if the Braves get Dunn it should be as a first baseman but I think that is a move for the off-season when you can juggle payroll and players around. The Braves will actually have the payroll flexibility that with a couple of moves they could afford to have dunn at first and holliday in left
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Completely agree. Braves should have some cash available this winter. one of Hudson/Vazquez will be gone by Christmas.
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 09:43 PM
Corey Hart is probably Frenchy 2.0. He is not the answer to our offensive woes. Why do people insist on offering Harts name on every post. We need a masher at the plate not Frenchys baseball twin.
Posted by: bravesbacker11 | July 06, 2009 at 10:02 PM
I would love to get Nelson Cruz...he'd provide a young power right-handed bat that we desperately need and we match up perfectly with Texas seeing as how they need pitching...
Posted by: Burns when I Peavy | July 06, 2009 at 10:20 PM
There is only one Atlanta-Texas trade that I (and i emphisize I before I get crucified for even suggesting it) but it would be
Atlanta sends- Yunel Escobar and Javy Vasquez
Texas sends- Elvis Andrus and Neftali Feliz.
While it is probably a trade Texas immediatly hangs up the phone on it would give them the best chance to win now. And Javy would have to waive his AL West ntc.
Posted by: my favorite is still #3 | July 06, 2009 at 10:41 PM
When your starting left fielder is G. Anderson your point about defense is mute. As bad as our offense is, Dunn will help us win more games than pop flies that he drops.
_______________________________
Agreed (except it's "moot"). I used to watch Dunn play a lot live when he was with the Reds and I don't think he is much worse than Anderson. Sure he drops a lot of balls and kicks stuff around and basically looks like a bull in the proverbial China shop (in fact, his tactic should be to put his glove on the end of a broomstick and just jam it into the ground... that will catch about as many balls), but he hits 40 HR's. That will cover up a lot of errors unlike Anderson's weak power production with limited defensive range. Having said all that I wouldn't want to trade much for him and the Braves can't afford him, so it's probably all moot after all.
Posted by: Brad426 | July 06, 2009 at 10:45 PM
To tack on to the off-season scenarios being thrown out, here's mine: bring back one of Gonzalez or Soriano, non-tender Kelly and Frenchy, trade Kawakami/Vazquez for prospects (preference Kawakamai), trade Kotchman and prospects for Adam Dunn, sign Holliday (5-6 yrs 75-100 million). Puts the payroll between 95 and 105 million and gives the pitching staff some run support with a strong lineup
Lineup
1. McLouth RF
2. Escobar SS
3. Chipper 3B
4. McCann C
5. Holliday LF
6. Dunn 1B
7. Infante/Prado 2B
8. Schafer CF
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 06, 2009 at 11:13 PM
When your starting left fielder is G. Anderson your point about defense is mute.
Posted by: Tomahawk | July 06, 2009 at 06:28 PM
Hate to be the guy, but could you use your brain basket for just one second and realize that the word it 'moot' not 'mute'?
Posted by: The Decemberist | July 06, 2009 at 11:21 PM
I have no clue what the contracts are like, I just want people to tell me how stupid I am for even thinking about this...
How about Lowe OR Javy (if he'd approve), Medlan, Frenchy, KJ, Gonzo and Schafer for Cruz, Kinsler, Francisco, Andruw and Feldman.
If not, say the Braves asked Texas for a price tag on those players, who do you think Texas would ask for in return?
Posted by: The Decemberist | July 06, 2009 at 11:36 PM
The Braves are not trading Lowe, that's stupid. We payed way too much for him and he's too productive, despite this rough patch as of lately. Also, trading Kotchman is another idiotic idea. He is one of the most underrated first baseman in the league. Yes, he is not a power hitter, but his glove is way above average and he will guarantee you an out and an a good average.
Escobar for Ellsbury(Red Sox)
I want Ellsbury in a Braves uniform. His speed and glove is exactly what we need in right field, despite having a lefty glove. Having Ellsbury, McLouth, and Schaefer(next season) in the outfield should save us some runs that we can't afford. Plus McLouth would best fit as a third bat and Ellsbury speed and hitting ability is what we need as a profound lead off man.
Escobar is great, don't get me wrong. I just don't think he has the power or consistency in the future to stay as our number five hitter. And his errors are giving me ulcers.
Frenchy for Cabrera(A's) or Bloomquist(Royals)
This would just to fill the eighth hole in the line up with speed, as well as the position with one gold-glove and one potential gold-glove shortstop.
1. Ellsbury(RF/LF)
2. Prado(2B)
3. McLouth(CF)
4. Jones(3B)
5. McCann(C)
6. Diaz/Anderson(LF/RF)
7. Kotchman(1B)
8. Cabrera/Bloomquist(SS)
Posted by: MPESH | July 07, 2009 at 05:46 AM
The Braves are not trading Lowe, that's stupid. We payed way too much for him and he's too productive, despite this rough patch as of lately. Also, trading Kotchman is another idiotic idea. He is one of the most underrated first baseman in the league. Yes, he is not a power hitter, but his glove is way above average and he will guarantee you an out and an a good average.
Escobar for Ellsbury(Red Sox)
I want Ellsbury in a Braves uniform. His speed and glove is exactly what we need in right field, despite having a lefty glove. Having Ellsbury, McLouth, and Schaefer(next season) in the outfield should save us some runs that we can't afford. Plus McLouth would best fit as a third bat and Ellsbury speed and hitting ability is what we need as a profound lead off man.
Escobar is great, don't get me wrong. I just don't think he has the power or consistency in the future to stay as our number five hitter. And his errors are giving me ulcers.
Frenchy for Cabrera(A's) or Bloomquist(Royals)
This would just to fill the eighth hole in the line up with speed, as well as the position with one gold-glove and one potential gold-glove shortstop.
1. Ellsbury(RF/LF)
2. Prado(2B)
3. McLouth(CF)
4. Jones(3B)
5. McCann(C)
6. Diaz/Anderson(LF/RF)
7. Kotchman(1B)
8. Cabrera/Bloomquist(SS)
Posted by: MPESH | July 07, 2009 at 05:46 AM
My comment above would be a very little upgrade, but seems to be the best option without giving away our best prospects and Javy, who is our second most productive pitcher as of now behind JJ.
Posted by: MPESH | July 07, 2009 at 05:54 AM
"Also, trading Kotchman is another idiotic idea. He is one of the most underrated first baseman in the league. Yes, he is not a power hitter, but his glove is way above average and he will guarantee you an out and an a good average."
The runs he saves with his glove are off-set by his terrible hitting. He is OPS'ing right around .720 which is mediocre. If we want to upgrade the offense, first and left are where it gets done.
MPESH, why does that trade make sense? It creates a huge hole at short for the braves and in center for the red sox. Neither team has a replacement option either. We need to add power not speed, still think my scenario is a solid idea. Adding Holliday and Dunn for next year would give the braves one of the better lineups in baseball to go with an excellent rotation
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 07, 2009 at 07:04 AM
i agree with bravesfan.
We have too many infielders, too many starters and very little power. Adding an intimidating presence in that lineup would create some serious problems for the rest of the NL.
Posted by: sconia25 | July 07, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Why do people keep throwing out Jeff Failcour as a trade option. He has ZERO trade value. You cannot get a major leaguer for him much less Orlando Cabera. Everyone around baseball knows the braves are going to non-tender Francour so why waste a prospect or player to get him and his 3.3 million dollar contract when you can just sign him at a discount in the off season. Please stop thinking that the Braves can sucker some GM into trading a player of value for Failcour (and you can say the same for Kelly Johnson)
Posted by: my favorite is still #3 | July 07, 2009 at 01:21 PM
Actually, the Red Sox have a lot of outfield options so the gap in center would not exist. As for a huge hole at short, that's what Bloomquist or Cabrera would be for because either team can afford to trade these two players with their "supposed interest" in Frenchy and depth in their infield.
Moving McLouth into the third hole would prove him as the power hitter that he really is. McLouth has the most power on the team, but since he is basically the only one with speed Cox is forced to put him as the lead off man. Having a McLouth, Chipper, McCann and then Anderson/Diaz is more powerful than one may think.
As for getting Holliday and Dunn, if you really want power that makes sense, but I don't want to ruin our outfield with terrible fielding. Dunn is more of a DH, however we are talking National League. Plus both players would suck our salary away for next year, when we need to start looking for a power hitting second baseman or shortstop, i.e. Uggla(FL can't really afford him for too much longer). As you can see, I don't think too much of Escobar's potential. Yes, I cut him slack for his injury, but he is not going to remain this great of a hitter all season.
Posted by: MPESH | July 07, 2009 at 03:01 PM
As for getting Holliday and Dunn, if you really want power that makes sense, but I don't want to ruin our outfield with terrible fielding. Dunn is more of a DH, however we are talking National League. Plus both players would suck our salary away for next year, when we need to start looking for a power hitting second baseman or shortstop, i.e. Uggla(FL can't really afford him for too much longer). As you can see, I don't think too much of Escobar's potential. Yes, I cut him slack for his injury, but he is not going to remain this great of a hitter all season.
Posted by: MPESH | July 07, 2009 at 03:01 PM
I suggested putting Dunn at first where his defense doesn't negate his offensive value, yes he's below average there but not among the worst of the worst. And it's funny that you say Holliday would ruin our fielding because he is a plus defender in LF, his UZR/150 is well above average. We aren't getting an upgrade at SS because the only possible options would be Reyes, Ramirez, and Jeter (though factoring in age and contract id take esco). Yeah our payroll would be maxed but that is a team that can mash and pitch and that's why you spend money: to upgrade
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 07, 2009 at 10:29 PM