![]() |
|
|
| |
« Pirates Release Chris Snelling | Main | Dodgers Looking For A Reliever »
6:07pm: Hubbuch clears up some confusion: the Braves are sending the Mets cash in the deal. That makes more sense given the difference in salaries.
5:48pm: Adam Rubin of The NY Daily News reports that Braves also received cash in the deal. Church is making $2.8MM this year, his second arbitration eligible season. Francoeur is making $3.375MM in his first arbitration eligible year.
5:04pm: Hubbuch says the deal was straight up, one for one.
5:01pm: David Lennon tweets that Church was traded to Atlanta for Jeff Francoeur. Francoeur has put up a .250-.282-.352 batting line in 324 plate appearances in 2009.
5:00pm: Bart Hubbuch of The NY Post tweets that the Ryan Church has "apparently been traded." Church is hitting .280-.332-.375 in 255 plate appearances this season, and has been playing centerfield recently while Carlos Beltran is the DL.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Braves fans need to quit freaking out and trying to make a regrettable trade to temporarily fix our OF problem. Josh Willingham if the nats aren't looking for much makes sense or Alex Rios if the Jays want to dump salary for some mid level prospects but quit with the pierre type players who only represent marginal upgrades and make a lot. This off-season will provide lots of opportunities to upgrade RF/LF through either FA or a trade
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 10, 2009 at 08:19 PM
I think this is a good call for the Braves, but I really do hope that the Braves take him and KJ and send them somewhere for a power hitting right-fielder. I could see the much less questionable Church being a better cog than Frenchie. But who knows? I've seen what Church CAN do so maybe he'll rake.
Posted by: insomniac | July 10, 2009 at 08:28 PM
THANK YOU FRANK WREN!!! I have doubted him many times since he became GM but wow to get such a high return for Failcouer is impressive.
Posted by: beastuh26 | July 10, 2009 at 08:39 PM
Imagine how odd it's gonna feel when we see Frenchy step up to the plate in the blue, orange,and black! I like the deal, but I can still remember when I saw Frenchy's first game in Atl. on July 7th, 05'. Jeff smashed a three run shot off Glendon Rusch, I don't think I was more excited to see a prospect in my life. But, all things must come to an end.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | July 10, 2009 at 08:49 PM
As a Braves fan I couldn't be happier with this trade. The player I hate the most is going to the team I hate the most. In other words, I wouldn't wish Jeff Francoeur on anyone -- except for the mets.
Church is a balls to the wall player who is injury prone because of it. Bobby Cox is gonna love having him on the team.
Posted by: Roberty | July 10, 2009 at 08:55 PM
lol my god will you stop trying to package a deal for LaRoche .We dont need a first basemen we need someone who can play outfield as a STARTER not a SUPER-UTILITY we have like 5 of those. Additionally, Ill take Kotchman's defense over LaRoche's "potential" offense. You keep saying "one less error" that one less error could be a game.
WE NEED OUTFIELD OR OR HERES A THOUGHT JUST WAIT FOR THE OFF SEASON. JESUS.
Posted by: Bring Back Andruw | July 10, 2009 at 09:04 PM
The worst aspect of this trade for me is that with it being the Mets, I don't feel like I can really hope for Frenchy to turn it around for his own career's sake.
Posted by: ABravesFan | July 10, 2009 at 09:08 PM
hopefully francouer gets his swing back after getting away from pendleton for a bit.
no way laroche comes back to atl. his defensive stats are misleading. i watched a runner beat him to first on a ground ball hit five feet away from the bag, which was not missed or bobbled, but laroche's attention deficit disorder kicked in & he couldn't get it together and walk five feet to the bag before the runner ran 90 ft! cox has always been displeased w/ his lack of focus, don't expect them to give up anything for him... their problem is a power bat that plays a corner outfield position.
Posted by: kevin1013 | July 10, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Don't know much about Wren but those of you complaining about Wren have nothing on us Met fans with Omar at the helm. ANYONE watching Met baseball knows our #1 problem right now with all these injuries is anemic offense. So JF helps in that area how??????
This is a clear win for the Braves.
And I'm a Met fan. Sigh....
Church is a class act with a great work ethic. Hate to lose him right now, but good luck to you Ryan.
Posted by: Suse | July 10, 2009 at 09:24 PM
Hey jackoffs! This is a thread about the Braves trading Jeff Francoeur for Ryan Church; not Adam LaRoach vs. Kotchman. Get your own thread homos.
Posted by: drphonic7 | July 10, 2009 at 09:33 PM
I'm really surprised that Francouer isn't a Royal because of course Dayton loves him and isn't crazy about DeJesus or Teahan and from Wren's perspective it would have made it a lot easier on the fans to accept. Every Braves fan knows from here on out they will be rooting for Francouer and just hope the Mets loose. Jeff said all the right things today and nearly burst into tears when talking about his teammates and Bobby. Here is the reprocution that I'm shocked no one has mentioned. What does this mean for Brian McCann long term. When he hits free agency in a few years will he be less likely to stay now that his best friend since he was 12 is now gone. It may not, but if he walks you have to wonder. Anyway an end to speculation, Ryan Church will platoon with Diaz in right, Bobby said that was his current plan. Do ya'll realize Church hits .161 against lefties, so maybe that is for the best.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 10, 2009 at 09:38 PM
In the past plenty of people have criticized Omar, and I've always given him the benefit of the doubt. I'm starting to get to the point that I'd just like to see him gone. What an awful move for the Mets.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 10, 2009 at 09:49 PM
Wow, Braves fans might just be the worst, all things considered. Yankee fans and Red Sox fans like to overhype their prospects, but wow, you Braves fans and your trade proposals are borderline hysterical. And citing doubles, errors, and strikeouts as reasons for trading...wake up to the new era of baseball for the love of God.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure I saw one Brave fan post that Matt Diaz reminded him of Pete Rose. Find a new sport, bub.
Sorry to the intelligent Braves fans out there, but they were few and far between in this post.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | July 10, 2009 at 09:54 PM
I like the move alright. Church is a good player and actually more than I thought we would get for him.
Having said that, there has to be another move if the Braves want any chance of making the postseason.
Posted by: Thundersticks | July 10, 2009 at 10:00 PM
drphonic7: why don't you find you're own thread to whine & be cynical little bitch! last i checked this was mlbtraderumors, so why not talk about braves related trade rumors in a braves related trade rumor thread. next time add something constructive instead, jackass!
Posted by: kevin1013 | July 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM
How great will it be for the braves to be on the opposite end of all the Francouer strikeouts? The fact that they got anything is a huge +. Church is a better player and will only play better without the Mets craziness. Minaya is terrible! Outside of the Santana theft( which was really the fault of the twins). Over under on francouer bombs the rest of the year? I pick 4 with a soild .260/ .295/ .370
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | July 10, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Wow, Braves fans might just be the worst, all things considered. Yankee fans and Red Sox fans like to overhype their prospects, but wow, you Braves fans and your trade proposals are borderline hysterical. And citing doubles, errors, and strikeouts as reasons for trading...wake up to the new era of baseball for the love of God.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure I saw one Brave fan post that Matt Diaz reminded him of Pete Rose. Find a new sport, bub.
Sorry to the intelligent Braves fans out there, but they were few and far between in this post.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | July 10, 2009 at 09:54 PM
There really haven't been many trade proposals outside of Kotchman who's defense is overrated imo. Yes he's a plus defender at 1B but he gives all that back with his mediocre hitting. Yeah he has a decent average and hits some doubles but his OPs, namely his SLG is downright pathetic for a first baseman. As for the ridiculous three way trade between the phils, braves, and jays i can't really explain that. Why Philly would deal Jayson Werth for Medlen and garbage is beyond me. Every fan base overvalues their prospects especially mid market teams like atlanta because well we have to, they are really our only means of getting top notch talent because we aren't going to win many free agency bidding wars. I agree it gets out of hand sometimes but it is what it is
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 10, 2009 at 11:03 PM
I don't know why everyone is bashing Minaya. I'm a die hard met fan and will be the first to blame omar, but i like this trade. I mean church is doing slightly better now, and i liked church a lot, but it seems they want to get younger. He said he wants to make similar trades to these, and i hope he does because he has to do something to what he did last year. But on what he said about similar trades, who else do you see omar is talking about?
Posted by: johan is GOD | July 10, 2009 at 11:07 PM
i left out that francoeur has more potential and 25-26 than church at 31. I think frenchy will be a doubles machine and reinvent himself like wright at citi
Posted by: johan is GOD | July 10, 2009 at 11:09 PM
I signed up to this site simply to say that any Mets fan who believes they are getting value from Frenchy is incorrect. Any Braves fan who believes that this is a bad trade is also insane. Watching this man fail for the past 2 years has taken several months off my life. It is almost so inevitable that he will hit into a double play or swing on the first pitch that I can set my watch to it. As someone who has watched him play since he came into the majors, I can effectively say that there is no hope for his resurgence. Johan to hit doubles you have to actually make contact with the ball, this is a major problem with Jeffy. If it happens so be it, but putting a nice ribbon on a pile of poo and calling it David Wright, does not make it David Wright.
Posted by: Goldberg365 | July 10, 2009 at 11:18 PM
lmfao goldberg. that is how i feel sometimes about frenchy. i feel like this is a pretty good trade for us, although i do reflect the thoughts of what someone else posted about the mccann repercussions. i think church is going to do much better out of citi field, and francouer will do much worse in citi field. church is pretty horrific against lefties, so maybe a platoon would be best. but that means GA has to play against lefties...sigh, the braves still need another outfielder.
Posted by: beastuh26 | July 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM
Frenchy was a black hole against both rhp and lhp...Church as least will give you good at bats 3/4 of the time.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM
"i left out that francoeur has more potential and 25-26 than church at 31. I think frenchy will be a doubles machine and reinvent himself like wright at citi"
This is puzzling for a couple reasons.
First, age doesnt matter as much as talent and control time; sometimes people forget that. Francoeur might be younger, but you only have 1-2 years to find out if he will grow before he is gone anyway. And Church at 31 or Church at 32; it isnt a big difference. Church is just better though, normally by a fairly large margin. Even if he regresses slightly, Francoeur will have to progress quite a bit to reach the level. So you are banking on one getting better at the same time as one getting worse to break even - in a very short amount of time. Likelyhood? Extremely unlikely!
Then, “reinvent himself like wright at citi”? How exactly did Wright reinvent himself? Having one of his weakest seasons is reinventing himself? That statement had me scratching my head big time. First, you have to go down to come back up – something Wright never did. But then, this is a guy who’s defense has faltered quite a bit and has seen an offensive production decrease from the last two years.
Really, just an all around horrible post.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 10, 2009 at 11:51 PM
We called him Failcoeur for a reason Mets Nation.
Posted by: Bring Back Andruw | July 11, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Kevin, do you even know what you're talking about? Does that crack taste good? Jeeeeeesus Christ.
Posted by: drphonic7 | July 11, 2009 at 12:23 AM
i know i will get a ton of crap for this and that many will call me bias but who cares...
the entire Mets organization are a bunch of clowns. Are they trying to compete or are they trying to make all of baseball laugh and make them feel better about themselves? Francesca said on the radio the other day that the Mets need an entire change of philosophy, shake up everything from GM, to employees, from manager and coaches to players.....and I totally agree with him at this point.
Since the great Mike Piazza has left this team has progressively become more and more of a joke. I know I get attacked on this site for ripping on the Mets so much but it is SO DAM EASY TO!! I don't like seeing the Mets fail, they are a NY team and I am a proud new yorker, but they are easy to get frustrated out of your mind at if you pull for them, and easy to laugh at if you root against them.
I truly sympathize for Met fans. This is your starting RF for atleast the next 2 years.....truly awful, just awful.
Posted by: yanks09 | July 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM
The Braves just traded their open wound for the Mets' band-aid. Wren, I had some reservations, but looking back on the offseason and the more current McLouth and Church trades, I will never doubt you again.
I wish Francoeur the best, but he needed to go.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | July 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
i guess im indifferent on this trade as a met fan. its like we swapped a coke for a pepsi. church stinks it up against left hand pitching and the mets needed to do something to get a righty bat with some pop- they havent hit a homer in 70 innings.
Posted by: big jay | July 11, 2009 at 01:17 AM
frenchy wont solve any of the Mets power problems. He's slugging like .350 in normal parks, he'll get it under .300 at citi
Posted by: csg | July 11, 2009 at 01:29 AM
I just wish they traded Francouer to an AL team so I can truly wish him good luck, but since he's with the Mets, I hope he continues to stink it up.
IF Frenchy actually does turn it around (after hell freezes over) and help the Mets win something, Wren and every single one of us are going to look like complete jack*sses.
I would definitely hop on the "fire Terry Pendleton" bandwagon then.
Posted by: homeofdabrave | July 11, 2009 at 03:57 AM
Am I the only Mets fan who is happy with this trade?
Potentially Franceur can be the starting RF we need without any sort of price attatched.
Church was always going to platoon in RF.
We get potentially a full time RF with a great arm and high ceiling in exchange for a decent RF who wasn't the same since his concussion and was nothing more than decent.
I have trouble understanding this trade from a Braves perspective, they would have been better off going for Jose Guillen in exchange for Franceur.
Mets win this trade by a country mile.
I think Omar is pretty good with his trades its just his free agent signings or lack of on occasion(*Cough* Adam Dunn)that bring him down.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 11, 2009 at 05:28 AM
Happy might be too strong a word.
I'm happy at getting potential in Francoer but not happy that it took trading something of value to get him.
In hindsight my last comment was too positive...nobody won this trade.
This post is a more sober one I think we couldve got way more for Ryan Church but I still like the acquisition of Francoer.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 11, 2009 at 06:56 AM
I've just been researching on Fan Graphs and reality has hit me...HARD.
Yes the Braves most certainly did win this trade...by quite a bit.
And Ryan Church is a surprisingly good defender...I always thought of him as being around league average in RF.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 11, 2009 at 07:12 AM
I'm a Mets fan and can tell you that the Braves came out ahead in this deal. At least for now. Right now Church is a better hitter and glove in RF (UZR/150 stats at fangraphs).
I've watched him almost every day since he's been a Mets and he's on par with Beltran as a defender (not with the bat, of course).
Only if Francoeur has a renaissance or magically improves from his steady 3-year decline do the Mets get fair value from this deal.
Posted by: caseyB | July 11, 2009 at 09:19 AM
"...the entire Mets organization are a bunch of clowns."
A fan of the team that has spent about $200 plus million a year for the last 5-6 years and hasn't won a thing since they started testing for steroids should be the last to bash the Mets.
Posted by: caseyB | July 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM
I thought Jack Z was on his way to exec of the year for getting live bodies for Betancourt, but for Frank Wren to get a division rival to take one of the worst outfielders in the league off his hand and give him a replacement who is an upgrade in ever way - that's truly impressive.
Posted by: Monroe Says | July 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM
OhPityMe, That was a classic series of posts. I actually laughed.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Am I the only Mets fan who is happy with this trade?
Potentially Franceur can be the starting RF we need without any sort of price attatched.
Church was always going to platoon in RF.
We get potentially a full time RF with a great arm and high ceiling in exchange for a decent RF who wasn't the same since his concussion and was nothing more than decent.
I have trouble understanding this trade from a Braves perspective, they would have been better off going for Jose Guillen in exchange for Franceur.
Mets win this trade by a country mile.
I think Omar is pretty good with his trades its just his free agent signings or lack of on occasion(*Cough* Adam Dunn)that bring him down.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 11, 2009 at 05:28 AM
No im happy with it.Mets arn't scoring any runs with church so why not cwitch things up Frenchy has more of an upside i mean even if he sucks he cant do any more damage when ur gettin shut out 3x in a week and scoring 10 runs in ur last 7 games.
Posted by: nyreyes15 | July 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM
This seemed to be a trade more to benefit the players in hopes that a change of scenery would help there slumping season(s). That seems quite obvious.I feel indifferent about this trade living in New York and being a Braves fan.
"Guess it doesn't matter...Church will only be here the rest of the season. I'll find it hard to believe if the Braves offer him arb. next year."
Posted by: braves4life | July 10, 2009 at 05:56 PM
This is probably untrue. Garret Anderson will probably retire or go back to California. Where the Braves would pick up a contract left fielder i.e. Holliday. Platooning Diaz and Church in right. Don't tell me Diaz isn't surprisingly good this season either.
Posted by: MPESH | July 11, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I can understand tradeing Francouer for Church. Since Frenchie hasn't swung the bat well for a long time the braves needed to get someone while they could.
But why has Jason Heyward not got at least a small chance to play? He is doing great in the braves farm systems and could be a valuable bat in the middle of thier lineup.
Seeing as how the braves are willing to trade within the division. What about Vasquez for one of the Phillies big bats?
Posted by: kirvin | July 11, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Ever since Francoeur came into the league, he's been my favorite player, until this year. I was fed up with the struggles he constantly brought to the plate, which led me to believe that he could not hit major-league pitching. It wouldn't matter who it was, they would always make Jeff look overmatched.
So Frank Wren, Thank You. We subtracted from defense, however, when Church is FA or if we trade him this OS, we'll have an outfield of Johnson in Left, Schafer in Center, and Heyward in right.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM
"So Frank Wren, Thank You. We subtracted from defense, however, when Church is FA or if we trade him this OS, we'll have an outfield of Johnson in Left, Schafer in Center, and Heyward in right."
I assume it's Cody Johnson not Kelly? Either way there won't be a Johnson in left field next year. If anything it will be Mclouth or possibly someone else. Heyward Probably needs a little more time. He just got to AA. I assume September, 2010 Heyward will get his shot. But who knows he could surprise me which I would love :D
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | July 12, 2009 at 12:53 PM
This trade makes no sense to me . They have identical stats .And besides the mets arent going to make the postseason this year . Sorry met fans injuries can kill a team . delgado out till august its just a disaster.
Posted by: frank bob | July 12, 2009 at 04:55 PM
Terrible Terrible Terrible
The Braves are crazy and so are the mets. The braves should not trade Francoeur to a division rival. But Ryan Church is an underated player. Braves win this trade.
Posted by: dodgersrule99 | July 17, 2009 at 09:11 PM
**Bump**
Great trade Wren!!!
Posted by: crzyman2 | August 11, 2009 at 01:48 PM