![]() |
|
|
| |
« Discussion: When Is "Now" For The Blue Jays? | Main | D'Backs To Have Stable Payroll »
A few links for your pre-second half entertainment:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Rieber brings up some interesting points, but if he think Vernon Wells is one of the top 5 centerfielders in baseball he's delusional. He's barely in the top 5 in his own division.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 15, 2009 at 10:07 PM
This Rieber guy seems like an absolute moron. Even if the Yankees took on Wells' terrible contract, the Jays wouldn't take a package of "Gardner or Cabrera, Ramiro Pena and a couple low-level pitching prospects." Sure, they'd be shedding some major salary, but that is absolutely zero return. If that were all it would take, I'm sure the Sox could get involved by offering up salary relief and some baked beans.
Posted by: 0bsessions | July 15, 2009 at 10:09 PM
Amazing, a baseball writer that thinks Vernon Wells is a top 5 centerfielder. I don't even know how anyone can reach that conclusion, I stopped reading as soon as I saw that.
Posted by: zs190 | July 15, 2009 at 10:10 PM
# Anthony Rieber of Newsday.com argues that the Yankess are in a unique position to land Roy Halladay - if they are willing to eat the contract of Vernon Wells.
-----------------------
Where do these guys pull this from? While the Yankees have assets like Jackson and Joba etc, theyre missing the point that the Jays arent trading inside the division.
Posted by: xethicx | July 15, 2009 at 10:17 PM
Amazing, a baseball writer that thinks Vernon Wells is a top 5 centerfielder. I don't even know how anyone can reach that conclusion, I stopped reading as soon as I saw that.
--------------------------
Yah all those gold gloves mean nothing...
Posted by: xethicx | July 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Yah all those gold gloves mean nothing...
Posted by: xethicx | July 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Pretty much...
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 15, 2009 at 10:21 PM
"Yah all those gold gloves mean nothing... "
According to fangraphs.com, over the last 3 years Wells has the worst UZR of all MLB center fielders. C'mon, everyone knows gold gloves are a joke.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 15, 2009 at 10:25 PM
The Jays will not be able to get rid of Wells. I keep seeing this Halladay / Wells to the Yanks idea trotted out but I don't think there is a conceivable way that can happen. Sure the Jays would love to be rid of Wells contract but not at the expense of giving Roy Halladay away...to the Yankees no less(!).
If Halladay is traded, the Jays will NEED to maximize that return - not accept a bag of balls by tying Wells to it.
Posted by: deeselig | July 15, 2009 at 10:28 PM
LOL
Trade Zito. Who the hell would be dump enough to take on his salary and his crappy arm?
I guess if they gave up talent to get rid of his salary then maybe someone would bite.
Posted by: I like BJays | July 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM
That guy shouldn't be allowed to write anymore.
Vernon Wells is good? Yeah, right.
And there's still no way that they take that joke of a package. They would still expect to get at least some decent talent in return, and my guess is that Rios would move to center with Snider taking over in right.
But, damn, that's some stupid crap. Read the piece from Cameron on FanGraphs, instead, there's some good baseball analysis.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I have alot of trouble listening to anything that Dave Cameron is saying in that countdown after taking a look at number 40, Tommy Hanson.
"Despite a mediocre start to his major league career, Hanson is one of the most talented young pitchers in baseball. He put up video game like numbers in the minors and was the most impressive pitcher in the history of the Arizona Fall League last year. His four pitch mix contains two knockout breaking balls and an above average fastball. His lower present value and high risks push him down here, but he could easily be top 20 a year from now, especially considering he’s basically free for the next 3 years. "
While he has the right idea in noting that Hanson could be one of the games top pitchers in a few years, the first sentence is that Hanson had a mediocre start to his career. Hello, how does a 24 (or was it 27?) inning scoreless streak and a 4-0 record in 6 starts mean mediocre? How many K's does he have and isn't his ERA around 3.00? Thats almost ace-like already. I'm not sure who he was trying to fool with that one.
Posted by: GoldenGlove002 | July 15, 2009 at 10:33 PM
"ello, how does a 24 (or was it 27?) inning scoreless streak and a 4-0 record in 6 starts mean mediocre? "
Odds are he was referring to the first 11.2 innings of 8 earned runs, 15 hits, and 6 walks.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 15, 2009 at 10:39 PM
GoldenGlove, while I agree with your position, I think the list itself is pretty poorly constructed. He has Hanson, Heyward, and Kershaw all more valuable than A.Gon, but less valuable than James Shields.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 15, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Hanson hasn't been giving up a lot of runs, but he's also been terribly inefficient, walking a lot of guys and never really going deep (He's only made it past the sixth once). While I wouldn't say he's quite mediocre, he hasn't exactly been a phenom yet. Once he gets his walks down (Which he seems to be doing his last three starts), Hanson'll have rookie of the year potential written all over him.
Posted by: 0bsessions | July 15, 2009 at 10:41 PM
The Giants and Blue Jays should trade Zito for Wells. Think about it for a second. The contracts are equally bad, they perform at equal levels and as bad as people say Vernon is, he is a solid ML OF, he just makes 4 times what he deserves. Zito also isn't horrible, just a joke for his contract. Maybe teh change of scenery would turn them around and honestly Wells would be a good addition for the Giants line-up.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 15, 2009 at 10:42 PM
bravoboy10
thats not a bad idea at all
both contracts are exactly the same (7 years/$126MM)
both guys have shown they can be really good at times but will obviously never live up to their contracts
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | July 15, 2009 at 10:51 PM
If I'm the Blue Jays, I want nothing to do with Barry Zito.
Wells, may be a terrible contract, but Zito would get eaten alive in the AL East. As it is, he's done terrible the last few years in the weakest hitting division in the MLB. Moving a junkballer like him would probably inflate his ERA a full run.
Posted by: 0bsessions | July 15, 2009 at 10:54 PM
Damn! At first glance, I thought that Zito article read "Kawakami traded to Giants". I wish that would happen.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | July 15, 2009 at 10:57 PM
I'm not going to even read the Mercury piece on Zito; who would be dumb enough to take on that contract; frankly, it's the worst in the game. Releasing Zito is dumb, too- you still have to play him. Wow...
Then, we have a article saying Wells is a top player in the game today. Nooo, look at the UZR, folks! Ugh, these are worse than Jeter and Hunter, which I didn't think possible- -24.0 UZR/150 last year, -31.9 UZR/150 this year. He's worth very little, in case you didn't read my above ramblings.
Well, maybe this would work, hmm? Zito for Wells, straight up, Jays pay all Zito salary, Giants pay all of Wells'. It's sounds odd, but, neat, no?
Yeah, thanks for the Fangraphs article. I'm about to read that article, they always have top notch stuff there; it's an awesome sabermetric site, personally. I just wish they had ERA+ and OPS+, though, but, I can get that from baseball-reference.com (not my site, just saying).
GoldenGlove002- Sure, Hanson has terrific traditional, non-sabermetric, stats. His stats using sabermetrics are ugly. He has very small 0.1 WAR, BABIP of .236 (which will soon spike) 85.4 LOB%, and a 5.04 FIP. Yech! He's getting very lucky, and why Dave is saying he has a VERY medicore start to his career. Nothing against you, this is more of a message to everyone, but, if you go on a site like Fangraphs, you need to understand sabermetrics, what they are, how they work, and why conventional stats like ERA and wins can be very misleading. Hanson is the poster child for sabermetrics this year. I'm a full-time sabermetrician, so, I know, hehe. What team do I work for, or do I work for a club? That's for me to know, and for you not to find out.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Why would the Blue Jays do that?
1. The jays have tonnes of pitching for next season, where would Zito fit?
2. The Jays are not deep with capable defensive outfielders. Sure Wells' bat is flat but if traded Rios might take CF but who takes RF? Snider? Yah right, he couldnt field a fly ball if there was a meatball sub in it for him.
Posted by: xethicx | July 15, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Agh, should have been 'pay' Zito, not 'play' him, hah. That would be kind of funny if you played him after you released him.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 11:03 PM
For xethicX- fair enough. I was speculating the only way I could truly see those contracts being moved... the Jays are loaded with pitching, it somehow slipped my mind.
By the way, as you likely know, Marcum is starting in AA soon, against the Defenders, so he's on the track back soon, seemingly, so I hear.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM
GoldenGlove002- Sure, Hanson has terrific traditional, non-sabermetric, stats. His stats using sabermetrics are ugly. He has very small 0.1 WAR, BABIP of .236 (which will soon spike) 85.4 LOB%, and a 5.04 FIP. Yech! He's getting very lucky, and why Dave is saying he has a VERY medicore start to his career. Nothing against you, this is more of a message to everyone, but, if you go on a site like Fangraphs, you need to understand sabermetrics, what they are, how they work, and why conventional stats like ERA and wins can be very misleading. Hanson is the poster child for sabermetrics this year. I'm a full-time sabermetrician, so, I know, hehe. What team do I work for, or do I work for a club? That's for me to know, and for you not to find out.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 10:58 PM
As a sabermetrician, you should realize that sample size is one of if not the most important component. Tommy Hanson has pitched 41 innings in the majors, any sabermetrician will tell you that he has FAR too small a sample size to reach any sort of accurate assesment about his tendencies.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 15, 2009 at 11:08 PM
Tim Kawakami is a complete moron. He is the second coming of skip bayless and the only reason why he wrote this article is because it will get people riled up.
Barry Zito is a competent back end of the rotation starter and may be the best 5th starter in all of baseball. It is quite sad that you are paying 18M to a 5th starter, but it is sunk cost.
Releasing him makes zero sense.
Posted by: jct | July 15, 2009 at 11:13 PM
"As a sabermetrician, you should realize that sample size is one of if not the most important component. Tommy Hanson has pitched 41 innings in the majors, any sabermetrician will tell you that he has FAR too small a sample size to reach any sort of accurate assesment about his tendencies."
Yeah, I was about to say this. I want to see about 60-70 IP or so before making any judgment on Hanson and whether he is "ready" or not. Give him a bit more of a chance.
If his numbers look like Porcello's or Brett Anderson's, he belongs in MLB. If they look like Trevor Cahill's , he needs to be demoted ASAP.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 15, 2009 at 11:19 PM
i think zito fits with the mets, another player that has a good carreer then someone overpays that player so he sucks for example carlos beltran, pedro martinez,carlos delgado,and cliff floyd wen he played for the mets and sucked wit them, johan santana so so kinda. or tha dodgers with jason schimdt jeff kent manny derek lowe brad penny see the theme cant come up with there own young talent......
Posted by: dodgersuck95 | July 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM
Vernon Wells is a top 5 CF? He's hitting .263 with 9 homers, decent runs scored. Speaking conservatively, he's in the bottom half of ML CF defensively.
So there are only 4 CF that are better? Let me try:
Upton, Ellsbury, AJones, Beltran, Granderson, Sizemore, Kemp, Hunter, McLouth, and Victorino? There are ten, and they're just the locks. Many people would rather have McCutchen, Rasmus, Rowand, Cameron, Gutierrez, etc. as well.
Yankeee fans, and some of their writers, are completely oblivious. Gardner and Melky aren't prospects, folks.
Posted by: Chief | July 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM
Okay... I do sabermetrics in my spare time... I'd like to be a professional. But, I think I have a good start, I've thought of some of my own (RBI+, for example). Maybe I'm the next Voros McCracken? I wish.
You're dead on for sample size, though. While not the best compairison, I use minor league number for sample sizes, since it's what there is...
Using minor league stats, though, his BABIP is around the .260's-.270's. Thirty or forty points is fairly substantial, no? His LOB% is interesting, though; it's usually been this high, which highly favors him. His minor league average FIP from '06 is 2.8475. Given that would go up a little in the majors, he will get better over time.
Nonetheless, the major league experience for Tommy Hanson, this year, is not great, at all, to say the least. I think that was the point Dave was making.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 11:26 PM
Yeah... I mean over the next few years. I don't expect Hanson to do well the rest of the year. I like the kid, though. I'm just thinking the Braves might be in for a little unpleasant surprise soon.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 11:29 PM
UnbiaseddYankee-
I do agree with you thinking back on it that it is fangraphs and it's not really traditional stats that are being considered there. But I don't know so much about Hanson getting lucky. I know almost nothing about sabermetrics, so I'm not going to make a fool out of myself arguing with any of that stuff, I'm more of a traditional stats guy and just watching what I see on the TV. And after watching all but one of Hanson's starts along with a few minor league games I think what we are seeing from him is the real thing. What I've noticed (again all I am is an obsessed fan, no professional) is that he works with everything he has. This means going to 3-2 counts and bases loaded often, but in the end getting the job done. It tells me he's not Roy Halladay going the whole game, but with a decent bullpen behhind him he can still get the one most important stats, wins for the braves. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see him make things a little less... interesting, but I feel like he knows what he is doing everytime he goes out there and throws a pitch
Posted by: GoldenGlove002 | July 15, 2009 at 11:31 PM
"i think zito fits with the mets, another player that has a good carreer then someone overpays that player so he sucks for example carlos beltran, pedro martinez,carlos delgado,and cliff floyd wen he played for the mets and sucked wit them, johan santana so so kinda."
Beltran hasn't exactly sucked since joining the Mets...he's probably been the best centerfielder in baseball in that span. Delgado is hurt this season, but he's easily earned his contract. Santana gets paid alot, but he's been one of the best starters in baseball since coming to NY.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 15, 2009 at 11:34 PM
I'm happy to teach you sabermetrics, GG002. If you don't care to learn, fine. Sometimes in life, simple is better. I respect this.
Fangraphs makes it that much easier to learn these stats. Go search a player, say, Chipper Jones. Once you find him, scroll down to where it says, 'Advanced'. Simply click on 'Quick Glossary', and you'll get all kinds of sabermetric definitions, like BABIP, FIP, etc.
Here goes for everyone wants a quick Sabermetric guide: FIP = Fielding Independant Pitching, BABIP = Batting Average (of) Balls in Play, WAR = Wins over Replacement, OPS+ is park-adjusted OPS, UZR = Ultimate Zone Rating (fielding, the higher the better) Any others I should mention?
Well, who knows what will truly happen? Maybe he'll be like Dice-K, with lots of runners left on, though I doubt that, and really hope not. I fully expect him to be a pure #1, someday.
Posted by: UnbiasedYankee | July 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM
UnbiasedYankee- It's unfair to compare minor league numbers. To understand those numbers you need to look FAR beyond a sabermetrics approach. Take Austin Jackson, of our own team. Do you think the coaches at AA were more interested in developing his ability as a hitter, or padding his AA stats? This is 1000x for pitchers. Developing a 2nd or 3rd pitch in game situations isn't good for your numbers. Any player who has 3 + or ++ pitches will not be in the minor leagues for long, and therefore won't have too great of a sample size to compare other players to. That's why Shelley Duncan is an All Star at AAA and you see A-Rod go 1 for 47 in a AAA rehab stint. Some people are just passing through...
Posted by: nyankees | July 16, 2009 at 12:14 AM
NO TO ZITO AND WELLS TRADE!
Wells contract is worse than Zito's at this point. We are stuck with Zito for at least 2 more seasons then MAYBE Giants eat the remaining 2 yrs and cut him.
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 16, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Yankeee fans, and some of their writers, are completely oblivious. Gardner and Melky aren't prospects, folks.
Posted by: Chief | July 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM
-----------
Anthony Rieber is an idiot, but what's your point? Whoever refered to Gardner (a rookie) or Cabrera (3rd or 4th year) as prospects? Yanks are long, long, long shots to acquire Halladay but I also think we have to consider that a package INCLUDING a young mlb player surrounded by high upside prospects might be appealing to the Jays. I think they obviously have a good foundation and can be a decent team in 2 or 3 years. I don't think they plan on ripping these apart and starting brand new.
And PS.....Cabrera IS better than Vernon Wells right now...
Melky- 246 at bats: .285/.347 8 hrs
Wells- 365 at bats: .263/.312 9 hrs
plus Melky is a better defender @ $2 mil a year and only an idiot would assume $100 milion worth of salary just to get 1 1/2 years worth of Halladay.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM
"his BABIP is around the .260's-.270's. Thirty or forty points is fairly substantial, no?"
Pitchers can not control BAbip like that anyway. It is thought that hitters can, but even they gravitate to the norm many, many more times then not. Generally, 280-320 is what you can expect, anything outside of that is probably an abnormality. Also, abnormalities can even last for quite a while, it is not unheard of at all – it just ends up catching up to you at some point, almost without fail. (and I know you know that UBYankee, its mentioned more for the second part)
Which leads to Hanson.
“And after watching all but one of Hanson's starts along with a few minor league games I think what we are seeing from him is the real thing.”
GoldenGlove002,
He currently sits at .242 BAbip. That is somewhere between 7-10 hits missing to correct such a staggeringly low number. Factor his batting lines to account for those missing hits, (just assuming all are somehow singles) and you see something between .265/.358/.424/.782 to .285/.376/.444/.819 (up from .219/.318/.377/.695). Pretty dramatic, huh?
But as I mentioned, it is near impossible to get away from the average. Anyone under .280 (and especially .242) has to be considered extremely lucky. (likewise, anything over .320 is pretty unlucky)
So while his counting stats may look nice at first glance, imagine what they would look like if those extra 7-10 hits took place. That is most of what they were saying when they stated he was so very lucky to this point. And that is really the driving force behind the difference in his 5.04 FIP (basically an expected ERA) and the 2.85 ERA he actually sits with.
I imagine if he had a 5.04 ERA, you would be thinking he isnt pitching very well, wouldnt you?
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 16, 2009 at 01:02 AM
2nd that midtown. Why didn't Kawakami write this article on Wednesday? The day after Zito pitched 8.1 innings shutout ball against the Marlins. He waited until Zito was blown up by the worst hitting team in baseball. Of all the things to write about with the 2009 Giants Zito is the least story.
Zito has 10 starts giving up 3 runs or less. On father's day he had a no-no thru the 6th. His role on this team is to be the 4th or 5th starter. To expect anything else is foolish. The Giants aren't/can't trade or release him. There stuck with the league's most expensive 5th starter.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 16, 2009 at 01:17 AM
So Dave Cameron is telling me keeping Kershaw and Billingsley is a good idea. I tend to agree with him.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 16, 2009 at 01:19 AM
id almost go out on a limb and say Najer Morgan has more upside then Vernon Wells
Posted by: Bern5117 | July 16, 2009 at 01:24 AM
"Melky- 246 at bats: .285/.347 8 hrs
Wells- 365 at bats: .263/.312 9 hrs
plus Melky is a better defender @ $2 mil a year and only an idiot would assume $100 milion worth of salary just to get 1 1/2 years worth of Halladay.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 16, 2009 at 12:37 AM"
You got that right, most teams cannot afford Halladay's up coming contract.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 16, 2009 at 01:29 AM
GoldenGlove002,
Here, I also looked up a rundown of Jeff Francoeurs career if his BAbip is adjusted to his Career normal (which happened to be .300). I found it quite interesting – you may as well.
Normalized .300 BAbip – .272/.310/.521/.832 in 2005
Normalized .300 BAbip - .272/.305/.461/.765 in 2006
Normalized .300 BAbip - .263/.310/.414/.725 in 2007
Normalized .300 BAbip - .259/.313/.379/.692 in 2009
Normalized .300 BAbip - .270/.300/.372/.672 in 2009
Career Total .300 BAbip - .266/.308/.424/.732
When yearly BAbip matches his career total (not too surprisingly, the League Average), we see a guy who has basically held a .260-.275 BA and .300-.315 OBP with steadily declining power his entire career.
Of course, again, that assumes all extra/missing hits are singles since I couldn’t realistically account for extra base hits (only 2Bs and 3Bs are even possibilities) which didn’t take place/should be removed. But the extra/missing hit totals were not that high, so this is probably pretty sound. (and it really is pretty deflating to those holding out hope that Francoeur really was what he showed during his lucky 05 and 07 seasons, isnt it?)
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 16, 2009 at 01:33 AM
It's not even really about Vernon Wells talent, Cashman won't touch that contract, no team will, it will go down as one of the worst contracts in history. I honestly think Cashman gets more crap than he deserves, the guy 9 times out of 10 usually knows what he's doing (the 1 time was Johan. You have to make that trade of hughes, kennedy, and another player).
Posted by: money941 | July 16, 2009 at 08:08 AM
"Anthony Rieber of Newsday.com argues that the Yankess are in a unique position to land Roy Halladay - if they are willing to eat the contract of Vernon Wells."
Isn't this true for any team? And there are teams much better fit to deal with the Vernon Wells problem.
Not only that, but if it were that simple, any team that's close probably would try to jump right on it.
I agree with Ben's posts earlier. Roy will be a Philly before this year is over. They need him most and will be willing to cough up the most. They are one more starting pitcher (after Pedro) from making it a race between the Phillies and Dodgers in the NL and leaving everyone else behind. Right now, I don't see any NL teams that can beat the Dodgers. However (besides the Angels and maybe Rangers) I don't see the Dodgers as really holding up against any of the competitive AL teams (Red Sox, Yankees, Tigers, Twins).
How about the Dodgers for a surprise Halladay contender? They have the young talent and most certainly should be going for the win this year. They already have a solid pitching staff, but there is no one including Kershaw and Billingsly and whoever else is in their rotation currently (haven't been paying much NL attention this year) that can even be mentioned on the same page as Roy Halladay. Not only that, but look what Halladay did with Burnett? Perhaps some of that teaching could rub off on the Dodgers very young pitching staff.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | July 16, 2009 at 08:30 AM
Vernon Wells is owed 110M left on his deal.
Scott Rolen, Lyle Overbay, Alec Rios and Roy Halladay are owed a combined 110M.
If the Jays can trade Roy and Rios...to say...StL for Wallace and Rasmus, then ship Rolen to the Red Sox for salary relief and manage to trade Overbay and Scutaro to SF for the same...the Jays would have a better outcome than just dumping Vernon. The Jays have no shot at competing until they have tonnes of young depth..ala the Rays. Wallace and Rasmus would be a great start, to go along with payroll flexibility.
Posted by: torontolion | July 16, 2009 at 09:26 AM
UZR is a joke stat...please get off it. the idiot that developed it should be shot...
Posted by: Bravesfan13 | July 16, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Zito to Marlins for Dan Uggla and Reynel Pinto... just a thought
Posted by: xquiles21x | July 16, 2009 at 09:59 AM
What would be Yankees payroll, if they did acquire Wells, and Halladay?
Posted by: Cyyoung | July 16, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Figure the Yanks payroll for 2010 would be somewhat of a wash if:
they replaced the salaries of Damon (13 mil), Matsui (13 mil), Molina ($2 mil) and Pettite ($5 mil)= $33 mil
vs
Wells ($20 mil ??) and Halladay ($15 mil) and Cervelli ($400k).
Problem with that is you still need to find replacement for Damon in LF unless you committ to an OF of Cabrera/Wells/Swisher (uggh). Not horrible but would like to see more pop. And you would probably need another bat to replace Matsui's. So going into 2011 the payroll would probably be pushed back above the 208 mil it was for 2008 and closer to around $215-$220 mil (uggh). And $20 mil is sunk into Wells who's probably not giving you much in return. No way to justify paying $20 mil to Wells when you have Cabrera who's posting better offensive numbers and is a better defender making only $2 mil a year. What a joke that would be.
On the flip side if the Yanks DON'T trade for Halladay, then we can save tons of money.
Damon vs Austin Jackson = 12.6 mil saved
Pettie vs Hughes = $4.6 mil saved
Molina vs Cervelli = $1.6 mil saved
Matsui = $13 mil saved.
That's $32 mil that could be cut from the payroll or used to bolster the pen or sign a big bat in LF/DH. I think the configuration that I would most like to see would be:
1b-Tex
2b-Cano
SS/Utility-Pena
3b-Arod
C-Cervelli
LF/SS-Jeter
CF-Jackson
RF-Swisher
DH/C-Posada
4th OF-Cabrera
CC
AJ
Wang
Joba
Hughes
A better, younger, more athletic team at about $25-$30 mil less than where we are now. The challenge would be to carry young and not so exciting bats like Ajax, pena and Cervelli for a whole year. But what's lost in offense is made up on runs saved with improvements in CF, SS and C.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 16, 2009 at 11:18 AM
"Barry Zito is a competent back end of the rotation starter and may be the best 5th starter in all of baseball."
Brad Penny would like a word.
Posted by: 0bsessions | July 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM